<<

Replacing Fish in Diets Using a Mixture of Canola and Oil

Murray Drew, University of Saskatchewan Project Code: CUP.SCDC.ADF.2012-33 Final Report: November 2014

Researchers at the University of Saskatchewan initiated a three-year project in 2012 to develop methods to improve the fatty acid composition of aquaculture fish fed algae- oil blends instead of fish . The objectives of the project were to determine the optimal extrusion parameters required to maximize the digestibility of the algae oil/ product and measure the effect of feeding this product on the fatty acid composition of rainbow and Nile . Overall, the study results showed that the addition of an EPA-rich algae oil to canola oil-based diets can significantly increase the concentration of EPA in rainbow trout and Nile tilapia. For commercial applications, using algae oils high in both EPA and DHA in a mixture with canola oil can replace fish oil in aquafeeds.

The health benefits of consuming highly unsaturated omega-3 fatty acids, in particular EPA and DHA are well established, with the primary source in human diets from cold water fish, such as , trout, , and . The fatty acid composition of farmed fish is a reflection of their diet, which is currently derived from dietary fish oils. However, high costs and sustainability concerns are forcing industry to look for a replacement of fish oil in aquaculture diets. Industry is interested in canola oil due to its high omega-3 fatty acid content (alpha linolenic acid or ALA), excellent storage and handling properties. However, canola oil-based diets alone lower EPA and DHA levels when fed to fish, so the addition of algae oil, which contains approximately 30% EPA + DHA, may produce a product with properties similar to fish oil.

Researchers at the University of Saskatchewan initiated a three-year project in 2012 to develop methods to improve the fatty acid composition of aquaculture fish fed algae- blends instead of fish oils. To increase digestibility, a common extrusion manufacturing process was used. The objectives of the project were to determine the optimal extrusion parameters required to maximize the digestibility of the algae oil/canola oil product and measure the effect of feeding this product on the fatty acid composition of rainbow trout and Nile tilapia. Because the metabolism of rainbow trout in cold water and Nile tilapia in warm water are markedly different, both of these animal models were used to evaluate the use of the algae/canola oil blend as a fish oil replacement.

The project included four experiments using Nile tilapia and rainbow trout fed a mixture of canola oil and algal biomass ~20% EPA as a percentage of total lipid. In the extrusion/digestibility experiments, algae biomass was coextruded in a 50:50 mixture with wheat flour. The extrusion experiment used three extrusion temperatures (110, 130 and 150°C) and three feed moisture contents (16.9, 21.9 and 26.9 %) while maintaining other extrusion parameters constant to generate 9 extrudates containing algae biomass. The digestibility of these extrudates was then measured in Nile tilapia and rainbow trout.

In Nile tilapia, the digestibility of two fatty acids, palmitic and linoleic acid were significantly higher for the extrudates extruded at 130 °C, but showed no significant differences for EPA digestibility. Therefore, all subsequent experiments used a mix of the 3 extrudates produced at 130 °C. In rainbow trout, the digestibility of fatty acids was significantly higher for the extrudates produced at the 130 and 150 °C temperatures and lowest for those produced at 110 °C. The digestibility of EPA was close to 100% at the 2 higher temperatures, which supported the use of the 130 °C temperature chosen for the subsequent growth trials.

In the growth trials, fish were fed diet formulations containing 15+0, 14+1, 13+2, 12+3 and 11+4 percent of canola and algae oil respectively. A diet containing 15% fish oil was included as a positive control. The Nile tilapia were fed these diets for 70 days, while rainbow trout were fed for 78 days. At the end of the experiment, the whole body fatty acid composition of the fish was measured. The results showed that while EPA concentrations of the tilapia fish fed the 15+0 canola oil diet were significantly lower than for the those fed fish oil. The fish fed the 11+4 canola/algae diets had EPA levels that were equal to those fed fish oil. DHA levels in the tilapia did not increase when algae oil was added to diets suggesting that the synthesis of DHA from EPA was not significant. The results of the rainbow trout experiments were similar to the tilapia experiment with fish fed the 15+0 diet having EPA and DHA levels significantly lower than fish fed fish oil. However, fish fed the 12+3, 13+2 and 14+1 diets had EPA concentrations in tissue that were not significantly different that trout fed fish oil. As with the tilapia, DHA levels were not increased by feeding algae oil.

Overall, the study results showed that the digestibility of algal biomass can be increased to nearly 100% using extrusion. Furthermore, addition of an EPA-rich algae oil to canola oil-based diets can significantly increase the concentration of EPA in rainbow trout and Nile tilapia, with the 11+4 % canola/algae diets having EPA levels equal to those fed fish oil. However, to get high concentrations of EPA and DHA in fish tissues, both have to be provided in the diet. Therefore, for commercial applications, algae oils high in both EPA and DHA used in a mixture with canola oil can replace fish oil in aquafeeds. The research results will also be applicable for other omega-3-rich vegetable oils produced in Saskatchewan including and camelina oils.