DOCSLIB.ORG

Forage Fish Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Forage Fish Management Plan Oregon Forage Fish Management Plan November 19, 2016 Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Marine Resources Program 2040 SE Marine Science Drive Newport, OR 97365 (541) 867-4741 http://www.dfw.state.or.us/MRP/ Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Purpose and Need ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Federal action to protect Forage Fish (2016)............................................................................................ 7 The Oregon Marine Fisheries Management Plan Framework .................................................................. 7 Relationship to Other State Policies ......................................................................................................... 7 Public Process Developing this Plan .......................................................................................................... 8 How this Document is Organized .............................................................................................................. 8 A. Resource Analysis ..................................................................................................................................... 9 A.1. Description of the species included in the Plan ................................................................................. 9 A.2. Biological and ecological information on Forage Fish ..................................................................... 10 A.2.a. Mesopelagic fishes .................................................................................................................... 10 A.2.b. Pacific Sand Lance (Ammodytes hexapterus) ........................................................................... 13 A.2.c. Pacific saury (Cololabis saira) .................................................................................................... 13 A.2.d. Silversides (family Atherinopsidae) ........................................................................................... 14 A.2.e. Osmerid smelts ......................................................................................................................... 15 A.2.f. Pelagic Squids ............................................................................................................................ 16 A.3. Predator-prey relationships: Federally-managed FMP species and Forage Fish ............................ 18 A.3.a. Coastal Pelagic Species ............................................................................................................. 18 A.3.b. Groundfish ................................................................................................................................ 19 A.3.c. Highly Migratory Species .......................................................................................................... 21 A.3.d. Salmon ...................................................................................................................................... 23 A.4. Predator-prey relationships: Seabirds and Forage Fish ................................................................... 24 A.5 Predator-prey relationships: Marine Mammals and Forage Fish ..................................................... 24 A.5.a. Odontocetes ............................................................................................................................. 25 A.5.b. Mysticetes ................................................................................................................................. 26 A.5.c. Pinnipeds ................................................................................................................................... 27 A.6 Predator-prey relationships: Listed species and Forage Fish ........................................................... 27 A.7. Fishery-independent and fishery-dependent data .......................................................................... 28 A.7.a Mesopelagic fishes ..................................................................................................................... 28 A.7.b. Pacific sand lance ...................................................................................................................... 28 Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife 2 A.7.c. Pacific saury............................................................................................................................... 29 A.7.d. Silversides ................................................................................................................................. 29 A.7.e. Osmerid smelts ......................................................................................................................... 30 A.7.f. Pelagic squids ............................................................................................................................ 30 A.8. Threats from climate change and oceanographic factors ............................................................... 31 A.9. Threats from non-fishery sources.................................................................................................... 32 A.10. Sustainable harvest levels ............................................................................................................. 34 A.11. Information gaps and research needs ........................................................................................... 34 Table 1. Known data gaps and research needs for Forage Fish described in the Plan. ...................... 35 B. Harvest Management Strategy ............................................................................................................... 36 B.1. Management goals .......................................................................................................................... 36 B.1.a. Biological/Ecological ................................................................................................................. 36 B.1.b. Socioeconomic .......................................................................................................................... 36 B.1.c. Goals related to other fisheries management .......................................................................... 36 B.1.d. Metrics and Monitoring ............................................................................................................ 36 B.2. Current issues related to the resource ............................................................................................ 37 B.3. Analysis of Forage Fish landings ...................................................................................................... 38 Table 2. Oregon marine commercial landings (metric tons) of Forage Fish ....................................... 39 Figure 1. Oregon landings (metric tons; mt) of unspecified smelts and unspecified squids .............. 40 B.4. Social and cultural uses .................................................................................................................... 40 B.5. Biological reference points .............................................................................................................. 41 B.6. Evaluation of management tools ..................................................................................................... 41 B.6.a Federal regulations on Forage Fish ............................................................................................ 41 B.6.b. Osmerid smelts ......................................................................................................................... 41 Figure 2. Final published federal regulations ...................................................................................... 42 B.6.c. Regulatory conformance ........................................................................................................... 43 B.6.d. Monitoring ................................................................................................................................ 43 B.6.e. Allowance for new directed commercial harvest ..................................................................... 43 C. Literature cited and general reference material .................................................................................... 45 Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife 3 Executive Summary The Oregon Forage Fish Management Plan (hereafter ‘Plan’) is intended to provide active protection for a defined suite of forage fish species in Oregon marine waters. This Plan specifically pertains to commercial species that are not currently managed, regulated, or targeted by Oregon marine fisheries (hereafter ‘Forage Fish’). These protections are conveyed by a number of management tools, including prohibition of new directed commercial harvest of these species, and limiting bycatch in other fisheries. Forage Fish provide great benefit to the ecosystem as a whole and to all of Oregon’s marine finfish fisheries as an important source of prey for a wide range of species in Oregon waters. Fisheries supported by Forage Fish prey include both state and federal fisheries for groundfish, highly migratory
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Red Tail Barracuda (Acestrorhynchus Falcatus) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Red Tail Barracuda (Acestrorhynchus falcatus) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, March 2014 Revised, January 2018 and June 2018 Web Version, 6/7/2018 Photo: S. Brosse. Licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC). Available: http://www.fishbase.org/photos/PicturesSummary.php?StartRow=0&ID=23498&what=species& TotRec=2 (January 2018). 1 1 Native Range, and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2017): “South America: Amazon and Orinoco River basins and rivers of Guyana, Suriname and French Guiana.” Status in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the United States. This species is in trade in the United States. For example: From Pet Zone Tropical Fish (2018): “Red Tail Barracuda […] Your Price: $29.99 […] Product Description Red Tail Barracuda (Acestrorhynchus falcatus)” Pet Zone Tropical Fish is based in San Diego, California. From Arizona Aquatic Gardens (2018): “Yellow Tail Barracuda Acestrorhynchus falcatus List: $129.00 - $149.00 $68.00 – $88.00” Arizona Aquatic Gardens is based in Tucson, Arizona. Means of Introductions in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the United States. 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing From ITIS (2018): Kingdom Animalia Subkingdom Bilateria Infrakingdom Deuterostomia Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Infraphylum Gnathostomata Superclass Osteichthyes Class Actinopterygii 2 Subclass Neopterygii Infraclass Teleostei Superorder Ostariophysi
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11 the Biology and Ecology of the Oceanic Whitetip Shark, Carcharhinus Longimanus
    Chapter 11 The Biology and Ecology of the Oceanic Whitetip Shark, Carcharhinus longimanus Ramón Bonfi l, Shelley Clarke and Hideki Nakano Abstract The oceanic whitetip shark (Carcharhinus longimanus) is a common circumtropical preda- tor and is taken as bycatch in many oceanic fi sheries. This summary of its life history, dis- tribution and abundance, and fi shery-related information is supplemented with unpublished data taken during Japanese tuna research operations in the Pacifi c Ocean. Oceanic whitetips are moderately slow-growing sharks that do not appear to have differential growth rates by sex, and individuals in the Atlantic and Pacifi c Oceans seem to grow at similar rates. They reach sexual maturity at approximately 170–200 cm total length (TL), or 4–7 years of age, and have a 9- to 12-month embryonic development period. Pupping and nursery areas are thought to exist in the central Pacifi c, between 0ºN and 15ºN. According to two demographic metrics, the resilience of C. longimanus to fi shery exploitation is similar to that of blue and shortfi n mako sharks. Nevertheless, reported oceanic whitetip shark catches in several major longline fi sheries represent only a small fraction of total shark catches, and studies in the Northwest Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico suggest that this species has suffered signifi cant declines in abundance. Stock assessment has been severely hampered by the lack of species-specifi c catch data in most fi sheries, but recent implementation of species-based reporting by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) and some of its member countries will provide better data for quantitative assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Undesirable Substances in Seafood Products – Results from Monitoring Activities in 2006
    Undesirable substances in seafood products – Results from monitoring activities in 2006 Ásta Margrét Ásmundsdóttir Vordís Baldursdóttir Sasan Rabieh Helga Gunnlaugsdóttir Matvælaöryggi Skýrsla Matís 17-08 Júlí 2008 ISSN 1670-7192 Titill / Title Undesirable substances in seafood products– results from the monitoring activities in 2006 Höfundar / Authors Ásta Margrét Ásmundsdóttir, Vordís Baldursdóttir, Sasan Rabieh, Helga Gunnlaugsdóttir Skýrsla / Report no. 17 - 08 Útgáfudagur / Date: Júlí 2008 Verknr. / project no. 1687 Styrktaraðilar / funding: Ministry of fisheries Ágrip á íslensku: Árið 2003 hófst, að frumkvæði Sjávarútvegsráðuneytisins, vöktun á óæskilegum efnum í sjávarafurðum, bæði afurðum sem ætlaðar eru til manneldis sem og afurðum lýsis- og mjöliðnaðar. Tilgangurinn með vöktuninni er að meta ástand íslenskra sjávarafurða með tilliti til magns aðskotaefna. Gögnin sem safnað er í vöktunarverkefninu verða einnig notuð í áhættumati og til að hafa áhrif á setningu hámarksgilda óæskilegra efna t.d í Evrópu. Umfjöllun um aðskotaefni í sjávarafurðum, bæði í almennum fjölmiðlum og í vísindaritum, hefur margoft krafist viðbragða íslenskra stjórnvalda. Nauðsynlegt er að hafa til taks vísindaniðurstöður sem sýna fram á raunverulegt ástand íslenskra sjávarafurða til þess að koma í veg fyrir tjón sem af slíkri umfjöllun getur hlotist. Ennfremur eru mörk aðskotaefna í sífelldri endurskoðun og er mikilvægt fyrir Íslendinga að taka þátt í slíkri endurskoðun og styðja mál sitt með vísindagögnum. Þetta sýnir mikilvægi þess að regluleg vöktun fari fram og að á Íslandi séu stundaðar sjálfstæðar rannsóknir á eins mikilvægum málaflokki og mengun sjávarafurða er. Þessi skýrsla er samantekt niðurstaðna vöktunarinnar árið 2006. Það er langtímamarkmið að meta ástand íslenskra sjávarafurða m.t.t. magns óæskilegra efna. Þessu markmiði verður einungis náð með sívirkri vöktun í langan tíma.
    [Show full text]
  • Lipids in Common Carp (Cyprinus Carpio) and Effects on Human Health
    Lipids in Common Carp (Cyprinus Carpio) and Effects on Human Health Jan Mráz Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences Department of Food Science Uppsala Doctoral Thesis Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala 2012 Acta Universitatis agriculturae Sueciae 2012:75 Cover: Selection of carps for an experiment (photo: P. Kozák) ISSN 1652-6880 ISBN 978-91-576-7722-8 © 2012 Jan Mráz, Uppsala Print: SLU Service/Repro, Uppsala 2012 2 Lipids in common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and effects on human health Abstract There is evidence that n-3 fatty acids (FA), especially EPA and DHA, are beneficial for human health. This thesis examined factors influencing FA composition in common carp flesh, sought to develop a procedure for long-term sustainable culture of common carp with improved muscle lipid quality (omega 3 carp) and studied the health benefits of eating such carp in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. An approach using the bioactive compound sesamin to increase biosynthesis of EPA and DHA from alpha linolenic acid showed that addition of sesamin did not alter muscle lipid composition in common carp. Investigations of the response of carp to finishing feeding and prediction of FA changes by a dilution model revealed that fillet FA composition reflected the FA composition of the diet and was correlated to the length of the feeding period. The simple dilution model accurately predicted changes in the fillet FA composition. A procedure for long-term sustainable culture of omega 3 carp based on supplementation by pellets containing rapeseed cake and extruded linseed as a lipid source was developed and the carp were compared with fish supplemented by cereals and fish kept on natural feed (plankton and benthos) only.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial and Temporal Distribution of the Demersal Fish Fauna in a Baltic Archipelago As Estimated by SCUBA Census
    MARINE ECOLOGY - PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 23: 3143, 1985 Published April 25 Mar. Ecol. hog. Ser. 1 l Spatial and temporal distribution of the demersal fish fauna in a Baltic archipelago as estimated by SCUBA census B.-0. Jansson, G. Aneer & S. Nellbring Asko Laboratory, Institute of Marine Ecology, University of Stockholm, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden ABSTRACT: A quantitative investigation of the demersal fish fauna of a 160 km2 archipelago area in the northern Baltic proper was carried out by SCUBA census technique. Thirty-four stations covering seaweed areas, shallow soft bottoms with seagrass and pond weeds, and deeper, naked soft bottoms down to a depth of 21 m were visited at all seasons. The results are compared with those obtained by traditional gill-net fishing. The dominating species are the gobiids (particularly Pornatoschistus rninutus) which make up 75 % of the total fish fauna but only 8.4 % of the total biomass. Zoarces viviparus, Cottus gobio and Platichtys flesus are common elements, with P. flesus constituting more than half of the biomass. Low abundance of all species except Z. viviparus is found in March-April, gobies having a maximum in September-October and P. flesus in November. Spatially, P. rninutus shows the widest vertical range being about equally distributed between surface and 20 m depth. C. gobio aggregates in the upper 10 m. The Mytilus bottoms and the deeper soft bottoms are the most populated areas. The former is characterized by Gobius niger, Z. viviparus and Pholis gunnellus which use the shelter offered by the numerous boulders and stones. The latter is totally dominated by P.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area APPENDICES
    FMP for Groundfish of the BSAI Management Area Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area APPENDICES Appendix A History of the Fishery Management Plan ...................................................................... A-1 A.1 Amendments to the FMP ......................................................................................................... A-1 Appendix B Geographical Coordinates of Areas Described in the Fishery Management Plan ..... B-1 B.1 Management Area, Subareas, and Districts ............................................................................. B-1 B.2 Closed Areas ............................................................................................................................ B-2 B.3 PSC Limitation Zones ........................................................................................................... B-18 Appendix C Summary of the American Fisheries Act and Subtitle II ............................................. C-1 C.1 Summary of the American Fisheries Act (AFA) Management Measures ............................... C-1 C.2 Summary of Amendments to AFA in the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2010 ................ C-2 C.3 American Fisheries Act: Subtitle II Bering Sea Pollock Fishery ............................................ C-4 Appendix D Life History Features and Habitat Requirements of Fishery Management Plan SpeciesD-1 D.1 Walleye pollock (Theragra calcogramma) ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report No. 447 1974 •
    FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 447 1974 • ... FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Technical Reports FRB Technical Reports are research documents that are of sufficient importance to be preserved, but which ·for some reason are not appropriate for primary scientific publication. No restriction is placed on subject matter and the series should reflect the broad research interests of FRB. These Reports can be cited in publications, but care should be taken to indicate their manuscript status. Some of the material in these Reports will eventually appear in the primary scientific literature. Inquiries concerning any particular Report should be directed to the issuing FRB establishment which is indicated on the title page. FISHERIES AND MARINE SERVICE TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 44 7 THE SQUID OF BRITISH COLUMBIA AS A POTENTIAL FISHERY RESOURCE - A PRELIMINARY REPORT by S.A. Macfarlane and M. Yamamoto Fisheries and Marine Service Vancouver Laboratory Vancouver, B.C. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. BIOLOGICAL ASPECTS 3 III. COMMERCIAL ASPECTS 8 A. Fishing Methods 8 B. International Squid Fisher,y 15 c. Status of Squid in British Co1uabia 19 IV. NUTRITIONAL ASPECTS 27 v. PROCESSING 28 VI. DISCUSSION 30 VII. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 32 VIII. REFERENCES 33 1. I. INTRODUCTION Available catch statistics from 1965 through 1971 indicate • that world-wide landings of squid totalled roughly 700,000 metric tons annually. An additional 100,000 metric tons of cuttlefish and about 160,000 metric tons of octopus were also landed annually. Apart from the well-established squid fishery in the Monterey area of California and the relatively minor inshore squid fishery off Newfoundland, the North American fishing industry has tended to ignore the possibility of further exploitation and utilization of this resource.
    [Show full text]
  • MAF Underwatermission Synopsis Final
    Conceived by Max Serio Developed by Max Serio, John Hopkins, Martin Kase, Tina Dalton Directed by Max Serio, Tina Dalton Narrated by Rachel King, Juliet Jordan, Marcello Fabrizi Underwater Mission: Cleaner Friends First episode of the series. Our heroes: Sara,Maxi and Emma the sea turtle will explore who are their Cleaner Friends. Their adventure will be supported with the valuable information of "Sea Pad" their "friend-board computer". Cleaner Friends : Cleaner shrimp,moray eel,Blue Streak Cleaner Wrasse,Moorish Idols,Humphead Wrasse,Spadefish, sea star,Mushroom Coral,Bristletooths. Underwater Mission: Predators In this episode Sara and Max will experience an interesting trip with Emma the sea tur- tle. “Sea Pad” is going to show them the most interesting underwater predators and their habbits. Predators : Mooray eel (Ribbon eel, White eyed moray eel), Sand conger eel, Barracudas, Stonefish, Anglerfish, Lionfish, Mantis Shrimp, White tip reef shark, Tiger Shark Underwater Mission: Crazy Colours Maxi and Sara are going to visit the most colourful environment they have ever seen. Emma the sea turtle will take them to an underwater trip where they find the beautiful wolrd of crazy-coloured fish. Crazy-coloured fish : Gold Belly Damsel Fish, Emperor Angelfish, Yellow Ribbon Sweetlip, Peach Fairies, Anemones, Corals, Clown Trigger fish, Butterfly fish, Leopard coral trout, Scribbled Filefish, Lionfish, Cuttlefish, Nudibranch, Parrotfish Underwater Mission: Startling Shapes There are many shapes that the sea creatures and objects have. Emma, Sara and Maxi are going to discover as much of them as they can. Those they can’t spot on the first glance will be uncovered by the trusted clever “Sea pad”.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic "Pelagic" Fish Underwater World
    QL DFO - Library / MPO - Bibliothèque 626 U5313 no.3 12064521 c.2 - 1 Atlantic "Pelagic" Fish Underwater World Fish that range the open sea are Pelagic species are generally very Atlantic known as " pelagic" species, to dif­ streamlined. They are blue or blue­ ferentiate them from "groundfish" gray over their backs and silvery­ "Pelagic" Fish which feed and dwell near the bot­ white underneath - a form of tom . Feeding mainly in surface or camouflage when in the open sea. middle depth waters, pelagic fish They are caught bath in inshore travel mostly in large schools, tu. n­ and offshore waters, principally with ing and manoeuvring in close forma­ mid-water trawls, purse seines, gill tion with split-second timing in their nets, traps and weirs. quest for plankton and other small species. Best known of the pelagic popula­ tions of Canada's Atlantic coast are herring, but others in order of economic importance include sal­ mon, mackerel , swordfish, bluefin tuna, eels, smelt, gaspereau and capelin. Sorne pelagic fish, notably salmon and gaspereau, migrate from freshwater to the sea and back again for spawning. Eels migrate in the opposite direction, spawning in sait water but entering freshwater to feed . Underwater World Herring comprise more than one­ Herring are processed and mar­ Atlantic Herring keted in various forms. About half of (Ctupea harengus) fifth of Atlantic Canada's annual fisheries catch. They are found all the catch is marketed fresh or as along the northwest Atlantic coast frozen whole dressed fish and fillets, from Cape Hatteras to Hudson one-quarter is cured , including Strait.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Identification of Major Demersal Teleost Fish Species Along the Indian Coast
    Chapter Field Identification of Major Demersal Teleost 03 Fish Species along the Indian Coast Livi Wilson, T.M. Najmudeen and P.U. Zacharia Demersal Fisheries Division ICAR -Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi ased on their vertical distribution, fishes are broadly classified as pelagic or demersal. Species those are distributed from the seafloor to a 5 m depth above, are called demersal and those distributed from a depth of 5 m above the seafloor to the sea surface are called pelagic. The term demersal originates from the Latin word demergere, which means to sink. The demersal fish resources include the elasmobranchs, major perches, catfishes, threadfin breams, silverbellies, sciaenids, lizardfishes, pomfrets, bulls eye, flatfishes, goatfish and white fish. This chapter deals with identification of the major demersal teleost fish species. Basic morphological differences between pelagic and demersal fish Pelagic Demersal Training Manual on Advances in Marine Fisheries in India 21 MAJOR DEMERSAL FISH GROUPS Family: Serranidae – Groupers 3 flat spines on the rear edge of opercle single dorsal fin body having patterns of spots, stripes, vertical or oblique bars, or maybe plain Key to the genera 1. Cephalopholis dorsal fin membranes highly incised between the spines IX dorsal fin spines rounded or convex caudal fin 2. Epinephelus X or XI spines on dorsal fin and 13 to 19 soft rays anal-fin rays 7 to 9 3. Plectropomus weak anal fin spines preorbital depth 0.7 to 2 times orbit diameter head length 2.8 to 3.1 times in standard length Training Manual on Advances in Marine Fisheries in India 22 4.
    [Show full text]
  • ICES Marine Science Symposia
    ICES mar. Sei. Symp., 199: 459-467. 1995 Genetic differentiation in Berryteuthis magister from the North Pacific O. N. Katugin Katugin, O. N. 1995. Genetic differentiation in Berryteuthis magister from the North Pacific. - ICES mar. Sei. Symp., 199: 459-467. Berryteuthis magister is a widespread quasibenthic commercial squid from the North Pacific. Intraspecific genetic differentiation was determined by allozyme electrophore­ tic analysis. Eighteen sample lots (2100 individuals) from geographically separated North Pacific regions were subjected to allozyme electrophoretic analysis using a total of 14 enzymes and unidentified ganglion protein spectra with polymorphic zones. Four loci with variant allele frequencies greater than 0.05 were found to be useful for population studies. No significant violations of the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were found at any loci in the samples. There was no evidence of genetic differences between sexes. Analysis of genetic differentiation using Wright’s F-statistics, cluster analysis of genetic distances, and contingency chi-square analysis suggested that there are popu­ lation differences between squids from the three major geographical localities: the Sea of Japan, the Kurile-Komandor region, and the Gulf of Alaska. Genetic divergence between squid from the Kurile-Komandor part of the species range probably reflects subpopulation differentiation of local stocks from successive generations. O. N. Katugin: Pacific Research Institute o f Fisheries and Oceanography (TINRO), Vladivostok, 690 600, Russia [tel: (+7) 4232 25 7790, fax: (+7) 4232 25 7783], been investigated electrophoretically. This family is con­ Introduction sidered to be the most abundant group of cephalopods in During the last two decades biochemical genetic tech­ the subarctic waters of the Pacific Ocean where it pre­ niques based on electrophoretic separation of multiple sumably originated and diverged (Nesis, 1973).
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding Habits of the Common Thresher Shark (Alopias Vulpinus) Sampled from the California-Based Drift Gill Net Fishery, 1998-1 999
    PRETI ET AL.: FEEDING HABITS OF COMMON THRESHER SHARK CalCOFl Rep., Vol. 42, 2001 FEEDING HABITS OF THE COMMON THRESHER SHARK (ALOPIAS VULPINUS) SAMPLED FROM THE CALIFORNIA-BASED DRIFT GILL NET FISHERY, 1998-1 999 ANTONELLA PRETI SUSAN E. SMITH AND DARLENE A. RAMON California Department of Fish and Game National Marine Fisheries Service, NOM 8604 La Jolla Shores Dnve Southwest Fisheries Science Center La Jolla, California 92037 P.O. Box 271 sharksharkshark@hotniail coni La Jolla, California 92038 ABSTRACT (Compagno 1984). It is epipelagic, gregarious, and cos- The diet of common thresher shark (Alopius vulpinus) mopolitan, and in the northeastern Pacific seems to be from US. Pacific Coast waters was investigated by means most abundant within 40 miles of shore (Strasburg 1958). of frequency of occurrence, gravimetric and numerical Its known range extends from Clarion Island, Mexico, methods, and calculating the geometric index of im- north to British Columbia; it is common seasonally from portance (GII) of prey taxa taken from stoniachs col- mid-Baja California, Mexico, to Washington state.' It lected by fishery observers from the California-based is the leading commercial shark taken in California, drift gill net fishery. Sampling was done from 16 August where it is highly valued in the fresh fish trade (Holts et 1998 to 24 January 1999, a time when the California al. 1998). It is also sought by recreational anglers for its Current was undergoing rapid change from El Niiio to fighting ability as well as food value, especially in south- La Niiia conhtions. Of the 165 stomachs examined, 107 ern California.
    [Show full text]