Apples Adam's
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Apples Catalogue 2019
ADAMS PEARMAIN Herefordshire, England 1862 Oct 15 Nov Mar 14 Adams Pearmain is a an old-fashioned late dessert apple, one of the most popular varieties in Victorian England. It has an attractive 'pearmain' shape. This is a fairly dry apple - which is perhaps not regarded as a desirable attribute today. In spite of this it is actually a very enjoyable apple, with a rich aromatic flavour which in apple terms is usually described as Although it had 'shelf appeal' for the Victorian housewife, its autumnal colouring is probably too subdued to compete with the bright young things of the modern supermarket shelves. Perhaps this is part of its appeal; it recalls a bygone era where subtlety of flavour was appreciated - a lovely apple to savour in front of an open fire on a cold winter's day. Tree hardy. Does will in all soils, even clay. AERLIE RED FLESH (Hidden Rose, Mountain Rose) California 1930’s 19 20 20 Cook Oct 20 15 An amazing red fleshed apple, discovered in Aerlie, Oregon, which may be the best of all red fleshed varieties and indeed would be an outstandingly delicious apple no matter what color the flesh is. A choice seedling, Aerlie Red Flesh has a beautiful yellow skin with pale whitish dots, but it is inside that it excels. Deep rose red flesh, juicy, crisp, hard, sugary and richly flavored, ripening late (October) and keeping throughout the winter. The late Conrad Gemmer, an astute observer of apples with 500 varieties in his collection, rated Hidden Rose an outstanding variety of top quality. -
Watergore Trial Orchard
NACM Short Report 5.5 Liz Copas 2005 WATERGORE TRIAL ORCHARD NOTE This trial site no longer exists and unfortunately some of the LA Disease Resistant seedling were grubbed out. Propagating material is still available of most of the other cultivars mentioned. SUMMARY Planted 1990 Main orchard planted to double rows N/S of Major, Ashton Bitter, Ellis Bitter and White Jersey at 18 x 8 on M25. This rootctock has proved rather too vigorous for the good soil on this site. In retrospect more effort was needed to control the early growth of these trees and induce cropping. The pruning trial [NACM 95/5/1] demonstrated some response to belated pruning to centre leader and bending or tying down strong lateral branches. This has served as a useful model for other orchards of these varieties. Planted 1995 Selected early harvesting seedlings from the Long Ashton [LA 1978] breeding program; 2 bittersweet, 4 sharps and 1 sweet, planted E/W on MM 106. Poor tree shape and excessively early flowering has ruled out many of these. The best are LA 13/2 and LA 13/7, Tremletts crosses with a strong resemblance to the parent but with some resistance to scab and mildew. Both need some initial tree training but could be kept annual. Planted 1996 Selected old varieties with some potential for bush orchards were planted on MM 106 . Of these the most promising are Broxwood Foxwhelp and possibly the other Foxwhelps [all bittersharps], also Don's Seedling [bittersweet] and Crimson King [sharp] as early harvesting varieties. Both Severn Banks [sharp] and Black Dabinett [bittersweet] could make useful late harvesting varieties. -
APPLE (Fruit Varieties)
E TG/14/9 ORIGINAL: English DATE: 2005-04-06 INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NEW VARIETIES OF PLANTS GENEVA * APPLE (Fruit Varieties) UPOV Code: MALUS_DOM (Malus domestica Borkh.) GUIDELINES FOR THE CONDUCT OF TESTS FOR DISTINCTNESS, UNIFORMITY AND STABILITY Alternative Names:* Botanical name English French German Spanish Malus domestica Apple Pommier Apfel Manzano Borkh. The purpose of these guidelines (“Test Guidelines”) is to elaborate the principles contained in the General Introduction (document TG/1/3), and its associated TGP documents, into detailed practical guidance for the harmonized examination of distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) and, in particular, to identify appropriate characteristics for the examination of DUS and production of harmonized variety descriptions. ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS These Test Guidelines should be read in conjunction with the General Introduction and its associated TGP documents. Other associated UPOV documents: TG/163/3 Apple Rootstocks TG/192/1 Ornamental Apple * These names were correct at the time of the introduction of these Test Guidelines but may be revised or updated. [Readers are advised to consult the UPOV Code, which can be found on the UPOV Website (www.upov.int), for the latest information.] i:\orgupov\shared\tg\applefru\tg 14 9 e.doc TG/14/9 Apple, 2005-04-06 - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. SUBJECT OF THESE TEST GUIDELINES..................................................................................................3 2. MATERIAL REQUIRED ...............................................................................................................................3 -
Apple Varieties in Maine Frederick Charles Bradford
The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library 6-1911 Apple Varieties in Maine Frederick Charles Bradford Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Agriculture Commons Recommended Citation Bradford, Frederick Charles, "Apple Varieties in Maine" (1911). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2384. http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/2384 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of Maine in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN AGRICULTURE by FREDERICK CHARLES BRADFORD, B. S . Orono, Maine. June, 1911. 8 2 8 5 INTRODUCTION The following pages represent an effort to trace the causes of the changing procession of varieties of apples grown in Maine. To this end the history of fruit growing in Maine has been carefully studied, largely through the Agricultural Reports from 1850 to 1909 and the columns of the Maine Farmer fran 1838 to 1875. The inquiry has been confined as rigidly as possible to this state, out side sources being referred to only for sake of compari son. Rather incidentally, soil influences, modifications due to climate, etc., have been considered. Naturally* since the inquiry was limited to printed record, nothing new has been discovered in this study. Perhaps a somewhat new point of view has been achieved. And, since early Maine pomological literature has been rather neglected by our leading writers, some few forgot ten facts have been exhumed. -
Spring Issue Dog-Friendly Adams County! Tickets on Sale: June 1, 2018 Spring and Fall Are the Seasons with the Most Appropriate Names
MAGAZINE May / June 2018 COMPLIMENTARY Spring Issue Dog-Friendly Adams County! TICKETS ON SALE: JUNE 1, 2018 Spring and fall are the seasons with the most appropriate names. MAGAZINE MAY / JUNE 2018 We spring into brightness. Colorful flowers and delicious fruits and A publication of Gettysburg Times, LLC vegetables spring to life. In PO Box 3669, Gettysburg, PA September, they begin to fall to death. In this issue of Companion, we focus PUBLISHER on the rebirth - spring. Harry Hartman Holly Fletcher and Mary Grace Keller EDITOR help readers focus in on spring goals Alex J. Hayes of planting your own garden and MAGAZINE DESIGN growing your own vegetables. Kristine Celli Jim Hale explains how these BY ALEX J. HAYES wonderful plants are pollinated with CONTRIBUTING our buzzing friends. WRITERS Speaking of friends, two close friends Holly Fletcher of mine - my Golden Retriever Toby Jim Hale and Black Lab Callie - make their Mary Grace Keller Josh Martin Companion debut in a Vanessa A Note Vanessa Pellechio Pellechio feature about dog-friendly From The Gettysburg. PHOTOGRAPHY We round out this issue with John Armstrong another feature by Josh Martin about Holly Fletcher one of Adams County’s Mary Grace Keller all-star athletes. Jim Hale Editor We hope you enjoy this edition Darryl Wheeler and spring breathes new life into ADVERTISING SALES your world. Brooke Asper Tanya Parsons Nancy Pritt What’s Inside: David Kelly The Gettysburg Companion is published bimonthly and distributed throughout CALENDAR ����������������������������������������4 the area. The Gettysburg Companion can be mailed to you for $27 per year (six ����������������������� 7 issues) or $42 for two years (12 issues). -
RHS Award of Garden Merit: Fruit (With Descriptions) 2011
RHS AWARD OF GARDEN MERIT Fruit (with descriptions) 2011 The AGM criteria APPLE (Malus domestica) 98 Alkmene’ (D) (H4) 2 Intended as a practical guide ~ aromatic, Cox-like flavour. Good, for the gardener, the AGM is regular crops; some resistance awarded only to plants that are: to scab and mildew. Season: late Sept.–late Oct. • excellent for ordinary use in ‘American Mother’ appropriate conditions ~ see ‘Mother’ • available 93 ‘Arthur Turner’ (C) (H4) 3 • of good constitution ~ flavoursome cooker. Large, golden • essentially stable in form and exhibition fruit. Good, regular colour crops; prone to mildew; some resistance to scab. Striking, deep • reasonably resistant to pests LIBRARY and diseases pink blossom, for which AM 1945. LEY Season: Sept.–Nov. D 4 LIN Key to codes & ratings 93 ‘Ashmead’s Kernel’ (D) (H4) , ~ intense, fruit-drop flavour. RHS Each award includes a hardiness Cropping erratic; prone to bitter rating, which is an integral part of pit. Season: Dec.–Feb. 93 ‘Claygate Pearmain’ (D) (H4)* 4 the AGM, and should be included 93 ‘Belle de Boskoop’ (C/D) (H4)*‡ 3 ~ rich and nutty flavour. Good, in any citation of the award: ~ needs little or no extra sugar when regular crops, but can be poorly cooked; mellows to brisk eating coloured. Season: Dec.–Feb. H1 requires heated glass apple. Good, regular crops; very 98 DELBARESTIVALE ‘Delcorf’ (D) (H4) 3 H2 requires unheated glass vigorous tree. Season: Oct.–Apr.; ~ bright, attractive fruit; sweet, H3 hardy outside in some regions; keeps well honeyed taste. Heavy, regular needs frost-free protection in 93 ‘Blenheim Orange’ (C/D) (H4)*‡ 3 crops. -
National Apple Orchard Census 2012
National Apple Orchard Census 2012 1 Table of Contents Introduction Page 3 Executive Summary Page 4 Section 1 Orchard Area, Sales, Growers and Markets Page 6 Section 2 Varieties and Orchard Age Page 15 Section 3 Employment, Facilities, Business Development and Producer Page 21 Profile Appendix Tables Table 1: Apple Production Area (hectares) by Year of Planting and Apple Type in Ireland in 2012 Table 2: Number of Apple Trees by Year of Planting and Apple Type in Ireland in 2012 Table 3: Number of Growers of Each Apple Type by County in Ireland in 2012 Table 4: Sales of 2011 Harvest by Market by County Table 5: Production Area, Number of Growers and Sales for Most Commonly Grown Apple Varieties in Ireland in 2011/12 Table 6: Average (median) Prices per Tonne by Market for 2011 harvest Table 7: Apple Production Area (hectares) in Ireland in 1980-2012 2 National Apple Orchard Census 2012 Introduction The National Apple Orchard Census 2012 was compiled from information provided by the 45 commercial apple growers operating in the Republic of Ireland in 2012. The census provides an important overview of apple production, and comparisons are made to previous censuses (2007, 2002 and 1997) where possible. The census surveyed all commercial orchards, defined as follows: - a production area of at least 0.2 hectares of apples, including cider apples - the fruit from the orchard is sold every year - the orchard is sprayed against pests/diseases every year, or maintained to organic standards Within the 45 growers, there are two organic growers. Production areas are based on areas planted up to March 2012. -
Fruit Varieties in Nantwich Community Orchard May 2021 Apples
Fruit varieties in Nantwich Community Orchard May 2021 Text and photographs by Malcolm Reid The orchard was established in 2008 and now consists of forty-five trees, including twenty-six apple varieties, some of which are long-established cultivars, and a few particular to Cheshire. There are also three varieties of pear tree and three different sorts of plum tree. The information on the trees and their fruit was mainly produced using the following sources: A Guide to the Orchard and Kitchen Garden by George Lindley, edited by John Lindley, 1831 The Book of Apples by Joan Morgan and Alison Richards, 1993 The Apple Book by Rosie Sanders, 2010 The National Fruit Collection database http://www.nationalfruitcollection.org.uk/ Details from Elizabeth Falding of the fruit trees propagated by Tony Gentil All the photographs were taken in the community orchard. Apples Arthur W Barnes Culinary (cooking) apple This variety of apple tree was first cultivated in 1902 by NF Barnes and is named after his son, who was killed during the First World War. NF Barnes was the head gardener at the Duke of Westminster’s estate at Eaton Hall, near Chester. The apples are best picked in mid-September when they have turned red. They cook well, making a juicy, lemon coloured purée, with plenty of bite and flavour. Ashmead's Kernel Dessert (eating) apple Although this type of tree was first grown by Dr Ashmead, in Gloucestershire, in about 1700, it was not until the mid-19th century that it became widely planted in England. The fruits are best picked in early October when they have a yellowish-green, brown, and orange-red appearance. -
Survey of Apple Clones in the United States
Historic, archived document Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, policies, or practices. 5 ARS 34-37-1 May 1963 A Survey of Apple Clones in the United States u. S. DFPT. OF AGRffini r U>2 4 L964 Agricultural Research Service U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PREFACE This publication reports on surveys of the deciduous fruit and nut clones being maintained at the Federal and State experiment stations in the United States. It will b- published in three c parts: I. Apples, II. Stone Fruit. , UI, Pears, Nuts, and Other Fruits. This survey was conducted at the request of the National Coor- dinating Committee on New Crops. Its purpose is to obtain an indication of the volume of material that would be involved in establishing clonal germ plasm repositories for the use of fruit breeders throughout the country. ACKNOWLEDGMENT Gratitude is expressed for the assistance of H. F. Winters of the New Crops Research Branch, Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, under whose direction the questionnaire was designed and initial distribution made. The author also acknowledges the work of D. D. Dolan, W. R. Langford, W. H. Skrdla, and L. A. Mullen, coordinators of the New Crops Regional Cooperative Program, through whom the data used in this survey were obtained from the State experiment stations. Finally, it is recognized that much extracurricular work was expended by the various experiment stations in completing the questionnaires. : CONTENTS Introduction 1 Germany 298 Key to reporting stations. „ . 4 Soviet Union . 302 Abbreviations used in descriptions .... 6 Sweden . 303 Sports United States selections 304 Baldwin. -
A Manual Key for the Identification of Apples Based on the Descriptions in Bultitude (1983)
A MANUAL KEY FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF APPLES BASED ON THE DESCRIPTIONS IN BULTITUDE (1983) Simon Clark of Northern Fruit Group and National Orchard Forum, with assistance from Quentin Cleal (NOF). This key is not definitive and is intended to enable the user to “home in” rapidly on likely varieties which should then be confirmed in one or more of the manuals that contain detailed descriptions e.g. Bunyard, Bultitude , Hogg or Sanders . The varieties in this key comprise Bultitude’s list together with some widely grown cultivars developed since Bultitude produced his book. The page numbers of Bultitude’s descriptions are included. The National Fruit Collection at Brogdale are preparing a list of “recent” varieties not included in Bultitude(1983) but which are likely to be encountered. This list should be available by late August. As soon as I receive it I will let you have copy. I will tabulate the characters of the varieties so that you can easily “slot them in to” the key. Feedback welcome, Tel: 0113 266 3235 (with answer phone), E-mail [email protected] Simon Clark, August 2005 References: Bultitude J. (1983) Apples. Macmillan Press, London Bunyard E.A. (1920) A Handbook of Hardy Fruits; Apples and Pears. John Murray, London Hogg R. (1884) The Fruit Manual. Journal of the Horticultural Office, London. Reprinted 2002 Langford Press, Wigtown. Sanders R. (1988) The English Apple. Phaidon, Oxford Each variety is categorised as belonging to one of eight broad groups. These groups are delineated using skin characteristics and usage i.e. whether cookers, (sour) or eaters (sweet). -
Know Your · a S
MAGR Extension Folder 177 GOVS Revised October 1957 MN 2000 EF-no.177 (Rev.1957:0ct.) Know Your · A s by ELEANOR LOOMIS .,~I UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Agricultural Extension Service U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Know Your Minnesota Apples Variety Season of use Characteristics Use Oriole August Large summer apple, orange-yellow, striped with Dessert, pie, sauce, freezing red. Very good eating and cooking quality. Duchess August-September Early, cooking apple. Medium size, striped with Pie, sauce, jelly, freezing red. Too tart for good eating. Beacon August-September Medium size, very attractive red. Mild subacid. Dessert, pie, sauce, freezing Better for eating than Duchess; keeps longer. Wealthy September-November Long a favorite in Minnesota for eating and cook Dessert, baking, pie, sauce, ing. Medium size, striped red. jelly, freezing Lakeland September-December Medium size, solid red color, pleasant flavor. Slices Dessert, pie, baking, sauce, hold shape when cooked. freezing Minjon September-December Below medium size, very attractive red. Flesh Dessert, pie, baking, sauce, somewhat tart, stained with red. freezing McIntosh October-January Medium size, nearly solid bright red. High quality Dessert, pie, sauce, jelly, for eating. Rich flavor, but soft when cooked. freezing Cortland October-January Medium size, attractive red; white flesh similar Dessert, pie, baking, sauce, to McIntosh. Holds fresh color well in salad. jelly, salad, freezing Redwell October-January Large size, attractive red. Pleasant flavor, subacid. Dessert, baking, sauce Jonathan October-February Below medium size, solid bright red. A favorite Dessert, pie, baking, sauce, variety for all uses. jelly, canning, freezing Haralson October-March Medium size, attractive red. -
Brown Snout’ Specialty Cider Apple U.S
most popular alcoholic beverage made Yield, Labor, and Fruit and Juice Quality andconsumedintheUnitedStates; Characteristics of Machine and Hand-harvested however, by the early 1900s, cider had essentially disappeared from ‘Brown Snout’ Specialty Cider Apple U.S. markets (Proulx and Nichols, 1997). The rapid decline of cider 1 was due to a combination of factors, Carol A. Miles and Jaqueline King primarily a high influx of German and eastern European immigrants who ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. fruit storage, hard cider, harvest labor, Malus ·domestica, preferred beer, and many farmers mechanical fruit harvest, over-the-row harvester who were sympathetic to the Tem- perance Movement cut down their SUMMARY. In this 2-year study of ‘Brown Snout’ specialty cider apple apple trees (Watson, 1999). (Malus ·domestica) grafted onto Malling 27 (M.27) and East Malling/Long Ashton Cider is currently seeing a revival 9, we compared weight of total harvested fruit, labor hours for harvest, tree and fruit damage, and fruit and juice quality characteristics for machine and hand harvest. in the United States and although it Machine harvest was with an over-the-row small fruit harvester. There were no only accounts for 1% of the alcoholic significant differences due to rootstock; however, there were differences between beverage market, it is the fastest years for most measurements. Weight of harvested fruit did not differ because of growing alcohol market segment, harvest method; however, harvest efficiency was 68% to 72% for machine pick and with 54% increase in production each 85% to 89% for machine pick D clean-up weight (fruit left on trees and fruit year from 2007 to 2012 (Morton, knocked to the ground during harvest) as compared with hand harvest.