DOCSLIB.ORG

Stream-Aquifer Relations and Yield of Stratified-Drift Aquifers in the Nashua River Basin, Massachusetts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stream-Aquifer Relations and Yield of Stratified-Drift Aquifers in the Nashua River Basin, Massachusetts STREAM-AQUIFER RELATIONS AND YIELD OF STRATIFIED-DRIFT AQUIFERS IN THE NASHUA RIVER BASIN, MASSACHUSETTS by Virginia de Lima U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 88-4147 Prepared in cooperation with the MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Boston, Massachusetts 1991 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information, write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section 10 Causeway Street, Suite 926 Box 25425, Federal Center, Bldg. 810 Boston, MA 02222-1040 Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract..................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................. 1 Purpose and scope .......................................................... 2 Previous investigations ...................................................... 2 Acknowledgments .......................................................... 2 Description of the study area .................................................... 4 Geographic setting ......................................................... 4 Hydrogeologic setting ....................................................... 4 Sources of potential ground-water withdrawals .................................. 4 Stream-aquifer relations in stratified-drift aquifers ................................. 5 Methods of investigation ..................................................... 5 Site selection .............................................................. 5 Pepperell infiltration site ................................................ 6 Infiltration tests and Darcy calculation ................................. 6 Infiltrometer tests .................................................. 8 Shirley infiltration site .................................................. 10 Infiltration tests and Darcy calculation ................................. 10 Digital model simulation ............................................. 10 Evidence of induced infiltration based on water quality ........................... 13 Pepperell infiltration site ................................................ 16 Shirley infiltration site .................................................. 16 Maximizing induced infiltration ............................................... 16 Yield of stratified-drift aquifers .................................................. 20 Methods of estimating long-term yield ......................................... 20 Determining long-term aquifer yield from stream-discharge measurements ....... 21 Determining long-term aquifer yield from percent of basin covered by stratified drift ...................................................... 22 Methods of estimating short-term yield from storage .............................. 23 Aquifer yields ............................................................. 24 Pearl Hill-Willard Brooks aquifer ......................................... 25 Stillwater River aquifer ................................................. 25 Wekepeke Brook aquifer ................................................. 26 Still River aquifer ...................................................... 27 Catacoonamug Brook aquifers ............................................ 28 Witch Brook aquifers ................................................... 30 Summary of aquifer yields ................................................... 32 Appraisal of aquifer-yield estimates ........................................... 34 Summary and conclusions ...................................................... 35 References cited .............................................................. 44 Glossary .................................................................... 44 in ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Map showing location of aquifers studied and infiltration sites in the Nashua River basin .................................................. 3 2. Map showing water table on May 31,1985, after pumping 7 days, and location of observation wells and streamflow measurements at the Pepperell infiltration site ........................................ 7 3. Section showing hydraulic head on May 31, 1985, after pumping 7 days, and location of well and multilevel piezometer screens at the Pepperell infiltration site ...................................................... 8 4. Diagram showing infiltrometer equipment; A: constant-head set-up, B: falling-head set-up.............................................................. 9 5. Map showing water table on January 16,1985, after pumping 5 days, and location of observation wells and streamflow measurements at the Shirley infiltration site ............................................ 11 6. Section showing hydraulic head and location of well and multilevel piezometer screens at the Shirley infiltration site; A: on January 16, 1985, after pumping 5 days, B: on January 17,1985, 1 day after pumping ceased ................. 12 7. Map showing comparison of measured drawdowns and simulated drawdowns, based on a streambed conductivity of 2 feet per day, during July infiltration test at the Shirley infiltration site .......................................... 14 8. Map showing comparison of measured drawdowns and simulated drawdowns, based on streambed conductivity of 0.2 feet per day, during July infiltration test at the Shirley infiltration site .......................................... 15 9. Piper diagram showing mixture of aquifer and stream waters in the Bemis Road pumped well, November 27, 1985, at the Pepperell infiltration site ............ 18 10.-14. Graphs showing: 10. Well spacing needed for maximum induced infiltration in hypothetical aquifers typical of the study area ............................................. 19 11. Example of method for determining aquifer-yield durations ................ 21 12. Typical flow-duration curves for streams draining till and stratified drift .................................................. 22 13. Example of family of flow-duration curves used to estimate streamflow from percentage of basin covered by stratified drift ............................ 23 14. Comparison of measured streamflow and streamflow estimated from percentage of basin covered by stratified drift ............................ 23 15.-22. Graphs showing yield of the: 15. Pearl Hill-Willard Brooks aquifer ...................................... 25 16. Stillwater River aquifer .............................................. 26 17. Wekepeke Brook aquifer ............................................. 27 18. Still River aquifer .................................................. 28 19. Catacoonamug Brook aquifer ......................................... 29 20. Aquifers along tributaries to Lake Shirley ............................... 30 21. Witch Brook aquifers ................................................ 31 22. Regional aquifer along the Squannacook River adjacent to Witch Brook ............................................. 31 IV ILLUSTRATIONS (Continued) Page Figure 23.-2S. Maps showing areal distribution of transmissivity in the: 23. Pearl Hill-Willard Brooks aquifer and location of the water-supply well field and streamflow measurement sites .................................... 36 24. Stillwater River aquifer and location of the water-supply well, streamflow measurement sites, and seismic-refraction survey ........................ 37 25. Wekepeke Brook aquifer and location of the water-supply wells, streamflow measurements sites, and seismic-refraction surveys ...................... * 38 26. Still River aquifer and location of the water-supply wells, streamflow measurement sites, and seismic-refraction surveys ....................... 39 27. Catacoonamug Brook aquifer and the location of water-supply wells and streamflow measurement sites ........................................ 40 28. Witch Brook* aquifers and location of the water-supply wells, streamflow measurement sites, and seismic-refraction survey ........................ 41 29.-30. Geologic sections based on seismic-refraction surveys shown on: 29. Figures 24, 25, and 26 ............................................... 42 30. Figures 26 and 28 .................................................. 43 TABLES Page Table 1. Water quality of the stream, pumped well, and aquifer in Pepperell, November27,1985 ................................................... 17 2. Estimated yield from stratified-drift aquifers in the Nashua River basin (streamflow maintained at specified minimum low flow) .................... 33 CONVERSION FACTORS AND ABBREVIATIONS Multiply By To obtain Length inch (in.) 25.4 millimeter (mm) foot (ft) 0.3048 meter (m) mile (mi) 1.609 kilometer (km) Area square mile (mi2) 2.590 square kilometer (km2) Volume gallon (gal) 3.785 liter (L) cubic foot (ft3) 0.02832 cubic meter (m3) Flow gallon per minute (gal/min) 3.785 liter per minute (L/min) million gallons (Mgal) 3,785 cubic meter (m3) million gallons per day cubic meter per day (Mgal/d) 3,785 (m3/d) cubic foot per second (ft3/s) 0.02832 cubic meter per second (m3/s) cubic foot per second cubic meter per second per square mile per square kilometer [(ft3/s)/mi2] 0.01093 [(m3/s)/km2] inch per year (in./yr) 25.4 millimeter per year (mm/yr) Hydraulic Conductivity foot per day (ft/d) 0.3048 meter per day (m/d) Transmissivity foot squared per day 0.0929 meter squared (fl2/d)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN for Nashua River Watershed Association Volunteer Water Monitoring Program
    QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR Nashua River Watershed Association Volunteer Water Monitoring Program Amended Document Date: June 27, 2018 Prepared by: Nashua River Watershed Association 592 Main St, Groton, MA 01450 With funding from: The Fieldstone Foundation, The Greater Lowell Community Foundation, and member donations PROJECT MANAGER_________________________________________________________________ Martha Snow Morgan, Water Programs Director Date Nashua River Watershed Association PROJECT COORDINATOR____________________________________________________________ Kathryn Nelson, Water Monitoring Coordinator Date Nashua River Watershed Association PROJECT SUPERVISOR_______________________________________________________________ Elizabeth Ainsley Campbell, Executive Director Date Nashua River Watershed Association MassDEP QA COORDINATOR _______________________________________________________ Richard Chase Date NHDES QA COORDINATOR____________________________________________________________ Ted Walsh Date New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Nashua River Watershed Association Quality Assurance Project Plan Revision 2.0 4/30/2019 2.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 TITLE AND APPROVAL PAGE…............................................ ............................................................. 1 2.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................. 2 3.0 DISTRIBUTION LIST ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nashua Watershed
    Appendix A - Nashua River Watershed Tributary Basin Major Water Resource Issues, Recreation And Priority Habitat Areas, And Resource Protection Goals And Recommended Actions. (Note: The Metropolitan District Commission (MDC) is now the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR)) The Quinapoxet River Sub-Basin Land Area: 57 sq miles or 35,463 acres Primary Municipalities: Holden, Princeton, Rutland Permanently Protected Land Area: 11,396 acres or 48% River length: 10.6 miles % Imperviousness: 8.2 % # of NPDES* discharge permits: 3 minor Limited Protection Land Area (Chap. 61, etc.): 6,219 acres Dams: 1; DCR in West Boylston Geographic Overview and Ecosystem Characteristics: Most of this sub-basin lies in the Massachusetts communities of Holden, Princeton and Rutland with parts extending into Paxton and West Boylston. Located in the "fuzzy" zone encompassing parts of both the Upper Worcester Plateau and the Southern New England Coastal Plains and Hills ecoregions of central Massachusetts, this area drains into the Wachusett Reservoir: the largest body of open water in the greater Nashua River watershed. Topography is generally hilly, encompassing numerous flatter wetlands, broad valleys, and floodplains. A low percentage (8.2%) of total impervious surfaces — namely, paved areas such as streets, driveways, and parking lots — for this whole sub-basin indicates that concerns of compromised stormwater and other non-point sources of contaminants (for example: pesticides, fertilizers, oils, asphalt, pet wastes, salt, sediment, litter and other debris) is not a pressing concern. As detailed below in the "water resources" section, there is a large amount of permanently protected undeveloped open space in this sub-basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinton MP Second Printing 2012.Indb
    Town of Clinton Master Plan April 2009 Second Printing April 2012 Clinton Planning Board Clinton Master Plan Committee Community Opportunities Group, Inc. BSC Group, Inc. Dodson Associates Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Community Planning Solutions Contributors. Clinton Master Plan Committee, Philip Duffy, chair, and Tony Fiorentino, Mary Gibbons, Jodi Briedel, Michael Ward, Donald Lowe; Community Opportunities Group, Inc., Judi Barrett, project manager, Patricia C. Kelleher, preservation planner; BSC Group, Inc., Sam Offei-Addo, PE, PTO; Dodson Associates, Harry Dodson, principal, and Sarah laCour, landscape architect; Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc., Ralph Willmer, AICP; and Community Planning Solutions, Terry S. Szold, principal. Photography by Community Opportunities Group, Inc., and Dodson Associates, and courtesy of Philip Duffy and Ken MacGray. Table of Contents 1. MASTER PLAN GOALS .............................................................................................................1 2. CLINTON’S HERITAGE .............................................................................................................7 Setting & Context .............................................................................................................................9 Changing Times ..............................................................................................................................12 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS & TRENDS ....................................................................................15 Land Use
    [Show full text]
  • Report # 81–TMDL-2007-2)
    DRAFT NASHUA RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS Total Maximum Daily Load for the Nutrient Phosphorus MassDEP DWM TMDL (Report # 81–TMDL-2007-2) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS IAN BOWLES, SECRETARY MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ARLEEN O’DONNELL, ACTING COMMISSIONER BUREAU OF RESOURCE PROTECTION GLENN HAAS, DIRECTOR June, 2007 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY Limited copies of this report are available at no cost by written request to: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Division of Watershed Management 627 Main Street, 2nd Floor Worcester, MA 01608 Please request Report Number: # 81–TMDL-2007-2 This report is also available from MassDEP’s home page on the World Wide Web at: http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/resources/tmdls.htm#draft A complete list of reports published since 1963 is updated annually and printed in July. The report, titled, “Publications of the Massachusetts Division of Watershed Management – Watershed Planning Program, 1963-(current year)”, is also available by writing to the DWM in Worcester and on the DEP Web site identified above. DISCLAIMER References to trade names, commercial products, manufacturers, or distributors in this report constitute neither endorsements nor recommendations by the Division of Watershed Management for use. Front Cover Pepperell Impoundment Showing Surface Coverage of Floating Algal Mats and Macrophytes 2 Nashua River, Massachusetts Total Maximum Daily Load For the Nutrient Phosphorus 3 Project Name: Nashua River Seasonal Total Maximum Daily Load for the Nutrient Phosphorus Location: EPA Region 1, Massachusetts The following 3 segments are on the 303(d) list for nutrients. MA81-05 Confluence with North Nashua River, Lancaster to confluence with Squannacook River, Shirley/Groton/Ayer, 14.2 miles for nutrients.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview NRW Ecologic Significance
    Statement of Ecological Significance: The Nashua River Watershed Geography The Nashua River watershed drains 538 square miles in North Central Massachusetts and southern New Hampshire. The Nashua River has two main branches: the North Nashua River, which is formed by the junction of the Whitman River and Flag Brook in West Fitchburg, and the South Nashua River, which flows from The Wachusett Reservoir Dam to join the North Nashua River in Lancaster. The mainstem of the river then flows north to join the Merrimack River in Nashua, NH. The terrain of the Nashua River watershed is formed by rolling hill, which are more rugged to the north and west. The Nashua River valley follows a broad flood plain, bordered by hills, along the river's mainstem from Lancaster to Nashua. The watershed is located in the central highlands 'of southern New England. The watershed's topography shows the effect of the movement and melting of glaciers; many eskers and kettleholes can be found in the watershed. During the last ice age, rocky soil was deposited in uplands while the lowlands were buried in sand and gravel carried by glacial meltwater. Many of the watershed's rivers were once chains of glacial meltwater dammed by accumulations of rock and soil. The watershed therefore has a broad range of soil types, which support a diversity of plant community types. Landscape The Nashua River watershed includes areas of concentrated development as well as large areas of undeveloped open space. The Oxbow National Wildlife Refuge and the South Post area of Devens, located in the central region of the watershed, together make one of the largest contiguous blocks of undeveloped land in southern New England.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources of Massachusetts (-G---+
    Water Resources of Massachusetts (-G---+ U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 90-4144 Prepared in cooperation with the ’ ~ALTHOF.~SSACHUSETTS . DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, DIVISION 6~ WATER RESOURCES WATER RESOURCES OF MASSACHUSETTS By Alison C. Simcox U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 90-4144 Prepared in cooperation with the COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, DMSION OF WATER RESOURCES Boston, Massachusetts 1992 i . L U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can he write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Division Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Bldg 8 10 Massachusetts - Rhode Island District Box 25425 28 Lord Rd., Suite 280 Denver, Colorado 80225 Marlborough, MA 01752 . -1 CONTENTS Page Abstract ..................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................. 1 PurposeandScope ......................................................... 1 Physiographic setting ....................................................... 2 Glacialhistory ............................................................. 2 Geohydrologic setting .......................................................... 2 Hydrologiccycle .............................................................. 4 Surfacewater
    [Show full text]
  • UPDATED Appendix a Open Space & Recreation Plan
    Appendix A Nashua River Watershed Tributary Basin Major Water Resource Issues, Recreation And Priority Habitat Areas, And Resource Protection Goals And Recommended Actions. (Note: The Metropolitan District Commission (MDC) is now the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR)) The Quinapoxet River Sub-Basin Land Area: 57 sq miles or 35,463 acres Primary Municipalities: Holden, Princeton, Rutland Permanently Protected Land Area: 11,396 acres or 48% River length: 10.6 miles % Imperviousness: 8.2 % # of NPDES* discharge permits: 3 minor Limited Protection Land Area (Chap. 61, etc.): 6,219 acres Dams: 1; DCR in West Boylston Geographic Overview and Ecosystem Characteristics: Most of this sub-basin lies in the Massachusetts communities of Holden, Princeton and Rutland with parts extending into Paxton and West Boylston. Located in the "fuzzy" zone encompassing parts of both the Upper Worcester Plateau and the Southern New England Coastal Plains and Hills ecoregions of central Massachusetts, this area drains into the Wachusett Reservoir: the largest body of open water in the greater Nashua River watershed. Topography is generally hilly, encompassing numerous flatter wetlands, broad valleys, and floodplains. A low percentage (8.2%) of total impervious surfaces — namely, paved areas such as streets, driveways, and parking lots — for this whole sub-basin indicates that concerns of compromised stormwater and other non-point sources of contaminants (for example: pesticides, fertilizers, oils, asphalt, pet wastes, salt, sediment, litter and other debris) is not a pressing concern. As detailed below in the "water resources" section, there is a large amount of permanently protected undeveloped open space in this sub-basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Nashua, Nissitissit & Squannacook Rivers Management Plan
    Nashua River Wild and Scenic River Study Committee c/o Nashua River Watershed Association Nashua, Squannacook, and Nissitissit Rivers 592 Main Street, Groton, Massachusetts 01450 978-448-0299 | www.WildandScenicNashuaRivers.org Stewardship Plan Nashua, Squannacook, and Nissitissit Rivers Stewardship Plan – February 15, 2018 – February Plan Stewardship Rivers and Nissitissit Squannacook, Nashua, Nashua River. Photo: Ken Hartlage Squannacook River. Photo: Joan Wotkowicz Nissitissit River. Photo: Cindy Knox Photography February 15, 2018 Nashua River. Photo: Cindy Knox Photography. ome value the river for its enriching qualities, and some for its Sabundant water power, and some because they can idle away their time in catching pout and pickerel. There are some also who delight in it as a “thing of beauty” and a “joy forever.” They love to wander on its banks, to plunge into its depths and float upon its surface. They return again and again to gaze on its flow when it shimmers in the sun, or is mottled by the Nashua River at the Petapawag site in Groton, original oil painting by Heather Stoddart Barros, rain-drops, or ruffled by the breeze. They are never tired of watching it from created in honor of the 85th birthday of her mother, Marion Stoddart, a founder of the Nashua River Watershed Association some high bank, …or crumbling bluffs, and see it winding back and forth and a champion of permanently protecting a greenway along both sides of the rivers and their tributaries. in the broad valley, like the convolutions of a mighty serpent, gleaming in the light with silvery scales. Rev. Abijah P.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrologic Assessment Report
    CDM DEM-Office of Water Resources EOEA - Nashua River Basin Team Hydrologic Assessment Nashua River Watershed March 2002 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 60 50 Wastewater Flow Existing Flow 40 Virgin Flow 30 20 10 0 River River Brook RIVER River 2 NORTH Stillwater Stillwater Reservoir Nissitissit Nissitissit NASHUA Wachusett Wachusett Quinapoxet James Brook James Mulpus Brook Mulpus Catacoonamug Catacoonamug Contents Introduction 1.1 General ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Watershed Description............................................................................................ 1-1 1.3 Overview of Assessment......................................................................................... 1-2 Background Information 2.1 General ...................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Community Land Areas ......................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Surficial Geology and Aquifer Delineations ........................................................ 2-1 2.4 Water Supplies ......................................................................................................... 2-4 2.5 Wastewater Discharges......................................................................................... 2-26 2.6 Population..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nashua, Squannacook, and Nissitissit Rivers Stewardship Plan
    Nashua, Squannacook, and Nissitissit Rivers Stewardship Plan February 15, 2018 Nashua River Wild and Scenic River Study Committee c/o Nashua River Watershed Association 592 Main Street Groton, Massachusetts 01450 978-448-0299 www.WildandScenicNashuaRivers.org The logo for the Nashua River Wild and Scenic River Study Committee was designed by Kristen Mann. Graphic Design service for the final print version of the Stewardship Plan was provided by Geralyn Miller Design - www.GeralynMillerDesign.com. Nashua, Squannacook, and Nissitissit Rivers Stewardship Plan | i Nashua River Wild and Scenic River Study Committee Nashua River Wild and Scenic River Study Committee Voting Entities Town of Ayer .......................................................Beth Suedmeyer and Robert Pontbriand Town of Bolton ...................................................Rona Balco and Rebecca Longvall Town of Brookline ..............................................Jordan Bailey and Drew Kellner Town of Dunstable ..............................................Leah Basbanes and Jean Haight Town of Groton ...................................................Nadia Madden, Vice-chair and Stacey Chilcoat Town of Harvard .................................................Lucy Wallace, Chair Town of Hollis ....................................................LeeAnn Wolff and Laura Bianco Town of Lancaster ...............................................Bill Flynn and Susan Munyon Town of Pepperell ................................................Paula Terrasi and Mark Andrews Town
    [Show full text]
  • MWRA Clinton Wastewater Treatment Plant NPDES No
    M WRA Clinton Wastewater Treatment Plant NPDES No. MA0100404 Partially Revised Draft Permit Page 1 of 15 AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Federal Clean Water Act as amended, (33 U.S.C. “1251 et seq.; the “CWA”), and the Massachusetts Clean Waters Act, as amended, (M.G.L. Chap. 21, “26-53), Massachusetts Water Resources Authority is authorized to discharge from the facility located at: Clinton Wastewater Treatment Plant 677 High Street Clinton, MA 01510 to receiving water named: South Branch Nashua River (Class B Warm Water Fishery) in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements and other conditions set forth herein. The Town Clinton and the Lancaster Sewer District are co-permittees for Part D., Operation and Maintenance, which include conditions regarding the operation and maintenance of the collection systems owned and operated by the Towns; and Part E., Unauthorized Discharges. The responsible Town Departments are: Town of Clinton Lancaster Sewer District Department of Public Works P.O. Box 773 242 Church Street 226 Main Street Clinton, MA 01510 South Lancaster, MA 01561 This permit will become effective on the first day of the calendar month immediately following sixty days after signature.* This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, five (5) years from the last day of the month preceding the effective date. This permit supersedes the permit issued on September 27, 2000. This permit consists of Part I including effluent limitations and monitoring requirements, Part II including General Conditions and Definitions, Attachment A. USEPA Region 1 Freshwater Acute Toxicity Test Procedure and Protocol, February 2011; Attachment B.
    [Show full text]
  • Prolamina (Jen-Coat), Westfield, MA, MAG250856
    ~ RECEIVED lLlb/1.> St:J....t-v NCCW GP Appendix 5 APPENDIXS Suggested Notice of Intent Format UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY- REGION 1 FIVE POST OFFICE SQUARE SUITE 100 BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02109-3912 Request for General Permit Authorization to Discharge Noncontact cooling Water Notice ofIntent (NOI) to be covered by the General Permit Noncontact Cooling Water General Permit (NCCWGP) NPDES General Permits No. MAG250000 and NHG250000 A. Facility Information 1. Indicated applicable General Permit for discharge: MAG250000 181 NHG250000 D 2. Facility Information/Location: Facility Name Jen-Coal Inc. dba Prolamina Street/POBox 132 North Elm Street City Westfield State Massachusetts Zip Code 01085 Latitude 42° 07' 56" Longitude 72° 44 ' 39" Type ofBusiness Manufacturing - specialty extrusion coating for flexible packagjng applications. SIC Codes(s) 2671: Coated & Laminated Packaging; NAICS 322221: Coated & Laminated Packaging Paper 3. Facility Mailing address (if different from Location Address): Facility Name Prolamina Street/POBox PO Box 274 City Westfield State Massachusetts Zip Code 01086-0274 4. Facility Owner: Name Dave Hopkins - President ofUS Operations E-mail [email protected] Street/POBox------------ City----------- Smte _ _ ________________ Zip Code ____ Contact Person Tel Owner is (check one): Federal __State __Tribal _____ Private X Other (describe)---------------------------­ 5. Facility Operator (if different from above): Legal Name Brian Caraker- Plant Manager at facility E-mail bcaraker@prolam ina.com
    [Show full text]