Hydrology of the Upper Cheyenne River Basin A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hydrology of the Upper Cheyenne River Basin A Hydrology of the Upper Cheyenne River Basin A. Hydrology of Stock-Water Reservoirs in Upper Cheyenne River Basin By R. C. CULLER B. Sediment Sources and Drainage-Basin Character­ istics in Upper Cheyenne River Basin By R. F. HADLEY and S. A. SCHUMM GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1531 Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Reclamation as part of the soil and moisture program of the Department of the Interior UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1961 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.G. CONTENTS Page Abstract__ ______________________________________________________ 1 Introduction. _____________________________________________________ 2 Acknowledgments _________________________________________________ 2 Scope of fieldwork and method of selecting sample areas._______________ 3 Selection of sample areas_______________________________________ 3 Reservoir surveys____________________________________________ 3 Number and capacity of reservoirs_----------_-----__---___------ 8 Large reservoirs_______________________________________________ 8 Description of the reservoirs- _______________________________________ 8 Description of the basin____________________________________________ 13 Drainage and topography_______________________________________ 13 Climate._____________________________________________________ 15 Vegetation_ _________________________________________________ 16 Geology and soils-_-__--_-_____-_---_-_-___---__-____________-_ 16 Land use _____________________________________________________ 19 Use of water by livestock_______________________._______________ 19 Hydrology______________________________________________________ 20 Selection of observation reservoirs.______________________________ 20 Processing of observed data_____________________________________ 24 Evaporation by energy-budget method.__________________________ 76 Total evaporation and seepage.__-__________-_-___-_-___-_-_-__- 78 Construction of runoff maps______-_-__-_-______-__--_________-_ 85 Runoff from individual storm periods.__________________-__-_---_ 86 Application of hydrologic data to all reservoirs______-_-___-_-_____---_ 95 Determination of runoff retained by all reservoirs _________________ 95 Frequency and quantity of runoff__________---_-_______---_ 95 Contents of reservoirs at beginning of runoff __________________ 102 Retention curves.__-_______-_--__-______-_--_--_--_-__---- 105 Runoff retained in drainage basins above gaging stations ___________ 106 Runoff retained in small reservoirs_______-_-_-__--_-______-_- 109 Runoff retained in large reservoirs __________________________ 113 Summary of runoff retained in all reservoirs_________________ 113 Runoff retained by aggregate reservoirs for individual storms-______ 114 Determination of seepage volume._______________________________ 117 Comparison of measured and mapped runoff in tributary basins.---- 117 Determination of losses from water budget________._____-_____---_ 121 Reservoir losses______________[____________-__---_-_-__--_--__-_-_-- 125 Evaporation and seepage.______________________________________ 125 Effect of reservoirs on runoff in relation to losses__-_____-_____-_-- 130 Summary of water losses chargeable to the reservoirs_______________ 132 Evaluation of possible errors._____-_-____-____-_-_---___-___---- 134 Literature cited.__________________________________________________ 136 Index____________________________________________________________ 197 in IV CONTENTS ILLUSTRATIONS PLATE 1. Map of Upper Cheyenne River basin._________________ In pocket 2. Lines of equal runoff for 1951; May 21-24, 1952; and August 4-7, 1954____________________-__________.________ In pocket Page FIGURE 1. Map of sample area 564_____________-_-_-_______________ 5 2. Copy of sample field report on reservoir.__________________ 6 3. Contour map of reservoir in sample area 564.______________ 7 4. Complete drainage area study__________________________ 21 5. Profile of gaging slope_________________________________ 22 6. Map of reservoir.______________________________________ 23 7. Area and capacity curves-______-------------_-__--__-_-_ 24 8. Hydrograph of water-surface elevations ___________________ 25 9. Hydrograph of reservoir contents_____-___________________ 26 10. Hydrograph of reservoir surface area____________________ 27 11. Relation of evaporation and seepage to total loss from reser­ voirs.__----___________________--___---______-__-_-__ 85 12. Extent of storm runoff, percent of area contribution._______ 94 13. Average frequency of runoff, 1951-54_____________________ 96 14. Effect of size of drainage area on runoff ___________________ 99 15. Frequency of occurrence of storm runoff by class of annual runoff___________________________________________ 101 16. Storm events producing annual runoff_________.____--_-_ 103 17. Initial contents of reservoirs______-___-__---_-_____-___-_ 104 18. Retention eurves--____________--_-_-_-_-----_---------- 106 19. Annual runoff versus effective reservoir retention.__________ 131 20. Range in effective retention for possible errors in sampling___ 135 CONTENTS V TABLES Page TABLE 1. Tabulation of reservoir data in sample area 564.___________ 4 2. Runoff Cheyenne River basin, 1951-54 summer season__-__- 28 3. Computation of stock-reservoir evaporation rates in Cheyenne River basin..____---________--_-_--________----__--_. 79 4. Sample computation of evaporation and seepage from obser­ vation reservoir 35-_______--___-______-_____--____-___ 80 5. Evaporation and seepage from reservoirs.__-______--__-_-_ 81 6. Storm runoff at observation reservoirs.__________-_-_-_-_-_ 87 7. Annual number of flows, in acre-feet per square mile, in class indicated for 1951-54____.____________________________ 97 8. Application of retention curves to observation reservoirs_____ 107 9. Runoff retained in reservoirs, by drainage areas. ___________ 110 10. Summary of volume of runoff, in acre-feet, retained by all reservoirs..-_-_____-__________--_-_--______-------_-- 113 11. Summary of volume of runoff, in acre-feet, retained by all reservoirs for two storms ______________________________ 116 12. Volume of evaporation and seepage as percent of retained runoff in observation reservoirs _______________________ 117 13. Summary of reservoir study. _--_----_---------___------_ 119 14. Annual runoff of Cheyenne River near Hot Springs, S. Dak__ 120 15. Water budget for the Cheyenne River basin. Averages for 1951-54..___________________________________________ 121 16. Water budget for the Cheyenne River basin. Storms of May 21-24, 1952, and August 4-7, 1954.-__._________________ 122 17. Computation of effective retention______________________ 130 18. Disposition of runoff in the Cheyenne River basin above Angostura Dam_-_______-__-____-_-______-_-------__- 133 Hydrology of Stock-Water Reservoirs in Upper Cheyenne River Basin By R. C. CULLER GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1531-A CONTENTS [The letters in parentheses preceding the titles designate the chapters] Page (A) Hydrology of stock-water reservoirs in upper Cheyenne River basin. 1 (B) Sediment sources and drainage basin characteristics in upper Cheyenne River basin.______-____-_-__--___-___---______---. 135 in HYDROLOGY OF THE UPPER CHEYENNE RIVER BASIN HYDROLOGY OF STOCK-WATER RESERVOIRS IN UPPER CHEYENNE RIVER BASIN By E. C. CULLER ABSTRACT The objective of this investigation was to determine the effect on runoff of the many stock reservoirs in the Cheyenne River basin above Angostura Dam. As a first step it was necessary to determine, within reasonable limits of accuracy, the number of reservoirs in the basin, the storage capacity, the drainage area, and the water loss from each. A sampling method was adopted because the size of the basin, 9,100 square miles, prohibited examination of all reservoirs within the drainage area. Forty-nine sample areas of 9 square miles each were selected as a 5-percent sample of the 955 complete quarter townships within the basin above Angostura Dam. All reservoirs located within the sample quarter townships were surveyed. The 49 sample areas contain 466 operating reservoirs with an aggregate storage capacity of 2,618 acre-feet and an aggregate drainage area of 222 square miles. Applying the findings of the sampling to the area as a whole, it was estimated that the basin contained 9,320 reservoirs with an aggregate storage capacity of 52,360 acre-feet and an aggregate drainage area of 4,440 square miles. In addition there are 16 reservoirs in the basin having capacities in excess of 230 acre-feet. The aggregate total capacity of these reservoirs is 8,035 acre-feet. A network of observation reservoirs was operated during the four runoff seasons from 1951 to 1954. The number of reservoirs observed ranged from 48 to 57 and produced a total of 212 station-years of record. A complete record for each observation reservoir is included in this report. An analysis of the observation-reservoir records permitted the computation of volume of annual inflow to reservoirs in all parts of the basin, volume of inflow retained by reservoirs, and volume of retained inflow depleted by evapo­ ration and seepage. Complete computations were made of one each of the two types of runoff producing storms, typical of the Cheyenne River basin. Water retained by reservoirs is subjected to two major types of depletion evaporation and
Recommended publications
  • The Cheyenne River 2
    BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA ) IN THE MATIER OF THE APPLICATION BY ) HP14-001 TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE, LP ) FOR A PERMIT UNDER THE SOUTH DAKOTA) APPLICATION FOR ENERGY CONVERSION AND TRANSMISSION) PARTY STATUS BY FACILITIES ACT TO CONSTRUCT THE ) THE CHEYENNE RIVER KEYSTONE XL PROJECT ) SIOUX TRIBE ) COMES NOW, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, by and through its undersigned signatory, and pursuant to SDCL §49-41B-17(2)(3) petitions to be granted party-status in the above referenced matter. The petitioner's interests are as follows: 1. The Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe is a federally- recognized Indian Tribe residing on the Cheyenne River Sioux Reservation of South Dakota. The address of the Tribal government headquarters is Post Office Box 590, Eagle Butte, South Dakota 57625. 2. The Keystone XL project would cross lands that has been adjudged by the U.S. Indian Claims Commission and the U.S. Court of Claims to be the aboriginal and Treaty-titled land of the petitioner Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe. United States v. Sioux Nation ofIndians, 601 F.2d 1157, 1172 (Ct. Cl. 1975) aff'd 448 U.S. 384 (1980); Sioux Nation v. United States, 21 Ind. CL Comm. 371, 382 (1974). 3. The proposed Keystone XL (KXL) pipeline threatens to contaminate the source of water for our Mni Waste Water System. The pipeline is proposed to run through our aboriginal homelands just south of the western border of our present reservation. The proposed route of the pipeline will cross the Cannonball River, Grand River, Moreau River, and Cheyenne River in the Dakotas and these rivers individually and collectively enter the Missouri River in Lake Oahe, the Pick Sloan Reservoir immediately upstream from our intake.
    [Show full text]
  • North and South Dakota
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR BtELIiETIN 575 «v^L'l/"k *. GEOLOGY OP THE NORTH AND SOUTH DAKOTA BY W. R. CALVERT, A. L. BEEKLY, V. H. BARNETT AND M. A. PISHEL WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT FEINTING OFFICE 1914 vti.'CS i«\ IJ) C -«"PA4 £, * 0 CONTENTS. Introduction.............................................................. 5 Field work............................................................... 6 Previous examinations........:............................................ 6 Geography. .............................................................. 7 Location and extent of area............................................ 7 Relief................................................................ 7 Drainage.............................................................. 8 Culture. ....................................................v .......... 8 Descriptive geology........................................................ 9 Stratigraphy.......................................................... 9 Occurrence of the rocks. ........................................... 9 Cretaceous system (Montana group)................................ 9 Pierre shale.................................................. 9 Character and distribution................................. 9 Age..................................................... 11 Fox Hills^sandstone.......................................... 11 Character and distribution................................. 11 Age......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Dakota, Nakota, Lakota Life South Dakota State Historical Society Education Kit Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Goals and Materials 2 Photograph List 3-4 Books and CDs in the Kit 5 Music CDs and DVD in the Kit 6 Erasing Native American Stereotypes 7-8 Teacher Resource 9-18 Bibliography 19-20 Worksheets Word Find 21 Word Find Key 22 Crossword Puzzle 23 Crossword Puzzle Key 24 Word Scramble 25 Word Scramble Key 26 Activities Reading an Object 27-28 Object Identification Sheet 29-35 Trek to Wind Cave 36-37 South Dakota Coordinates Worksheet 38 Comparing Families 39-40 Comparing Families Worksheet 41 What Does the Photo Show? 42-43 Beadwork Designs 44-45 Beadwork Designs Worksheet 46 Beadwork Designs Key 47 Lazy Stitch Beading 48-49 Lazy Stitch Beading Instructions / Pattern 50-51 What Do You Get From a Buffalo? 52-53 Buffalo Uses Worksheet 54 Pin the Parts on the Buffalo 55-56 Pin the Parts on the Buffalo Worksheet 57 Pin the Parts on the Buffalo Worksheet Key 58 Pin the Parts on the Buffalo Outline & Key 59-60 Create a Ledger Drawing 61-62 Examples of Ledger Drawings 63-66 Traditional & Contemporary: Comparing Drum 67-68 Groups Come Dance With Us: Identifying Powwow Dance 69-72 Styles 1 Dakota, Nakota, Lakota Life South Dakota State Historical Society Education Kit Goals and Materials Goals Kit users will: explore the history and culture of the Dakota, Nakota and Lakota people understand the changes brought about by the shift from buffalo hunting to reservation life appreciate that the Dakota, Nakota and Lakota culture is not something
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of SDAS 1997
    Proceedings of the South Dakota Academy of Science,Vol. 76 (1997) 119 THE ORIGIN OF WATERFALLS IN THE BLACK HILLS, SOUTH DAKOTA Charles Michael Ray and Perry H. Rahn South Dakota School of Mines and Technology ABSTRACT We studied the largest waterfalls in the Black Hills to better understand the geologic and hydrologic reasons for their existence. The waterfalls studied include: an unnamed falls on the Cheyenne River above Angostura Reservoir, “Big Falls” on Battle Creek below Keystone, “Bridal Veil Falls” on Rubicon Gulch along Spearfish Canyon, “Spearfish Falls” on Little Spearfish Creek near Savoy, “Roughlock Falls” on Little Spearfish Creek above Savoy, the waterfalls of Fall River below Hot Springs, and “Cascade Falls” on Cascade Creek. The geology of each waterfall was determined, their heights were measured, and cross sections were constructed. The discharge over each waterfall was ob- tained from USGS records; where no records were available the discharge was estimated. The waterfalls form in primarily two different ways. First, where more re- sistant rock units are exposed, this resistant ledge of rocks forms rapids and/or waterfalls. Thus a “knickpoint” is formed in the longitudinal stream profile. Second, some waterfalls form where calcareous-tufa is deposited in the stream bed. This usually happens below springs draining the Madison Limestone. The calc-tufa deposits typically accumulate within a mile below the spring, in a reach that already contains rapids. The rapids further encourage the outgassing of carbon dioxide, leading to the deposition of calcite and/or aragonite. Data compiled in this research may be used to help understand the geo- logic processes that created these waterfalls and help preserve them as aes- thetic resources for future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Right of Way to Dakota Central Railway Through Sioux Reservation, Dakota
    University of Oklahoma College of Law University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 12-11-1883 Right of way to Dakota Central Railway through Sioux Reservation, Dakota. Message from the President of the United States, transmitting communication from the Secretary of the Interior relative to certain agreements with the Sioux Indians and right of way to Dakota Central Railway through Sioux Reservation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/indianserialset Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation H.R. Exec. Doc. No. 11, 48th Cong., 1st Sess. (1883) This House Executive Document is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 by an authorized administrator of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 48TH CoNGREss, } HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. {Ex. Doc. 1st Session. No. 11. RIGHT OF WAY TO DAKOTA CENTRAL RAILWAY THROUGH SIOUX RESERVATION, DAKOTA. MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, TRANSMITTING Communication from the Secretary of the Interior relative to certain agree­ ments with the Sioux Indians and right of way to Dakota Oentral Rail­ way tlwough Sioux Reservation. DECEMBER 11, 1883.-Referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs and ordered to be printed. To the Senate and House of Representatives: I transmit herewith a communication from the Secretary of the In­ terior of the 3d instant, submitting, with accompanying papers, draft of a bill '' to accept and ratify certain agreements made with the Sioux Indians, and to grant a right of way to the Dakota Central Railway Company through the Sioux Reservation in Dakota." The matter is presented for the consideration of the Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheyenne River Assessment Report FINAL July2007
    Water Quality Conditions of Antelope Creek, Black Thunder Creek and the Cheyenne River 2002-2006 Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality Water Quality Division Eric Hargett July 2007 1 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 3 DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT AREA ..................................................................................... 3 Environmental Setting ............................................................................................................................ 3 Stream Classification and Designated Uses ....................................................................................... 5 Surface Water Hydrology ....................................................................................................................... 5 DATA COLLECTION ...................................................................................................................... 6 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS .................................................................................................. 7 Streamflow Conditions ........................................................................................................................... 7 Chemical Quality ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cheyenne River Agency (See Also Upper Platte Agency)
    Cheyenne River Agency (see also Upper Platte Agency) Established in 1869, this agency is sometimes called the Cheyenne Agency. The agency was located on the west bank of the Missouri River below the mouth of the Big Cheyenne River, about six miles from Fort Sully. The following Lakota bands settled at Cheyenne Agency: Miniconjou, Sihasapa, Oohenunpa, and Itazipco. Headmen at this agency included: Lone Horn, Red Shirt, White Swan, Duck, and Big Foot of the Miniconjou; Tall Mandan, Four Bears, and Rattling Ribs of the Oohenunpa; and Burnt Face, Charger, Spotted Eagle, and Bull Eagle of the Itazipco. Today the reservation is located in north-central South Dakota in Dewey and Ziebach counties. The tribal land base is 1.4 million acres with the eastern boundary being the Missouri River. Major communities include Cherry Creek, Dupree, Eagle Butte, Green Grass, Iron Lightning, Lantry, LaPlant, Red Scaffold, Ridgeview, Thunder Butte, and White Horse. Arvol Looking Horse, 19th generation keeper of the Sacred Pipe of the Great Sioux Nation, lives at Green Grass. Collections ACCESSION # DESCRIPTION LOCATION H76-105 Chief’s Certificates, 1873-1874 (Man Afraid of His Box 3568A Horses, Red Cloud, Red Dog, High Wolf) Indian Register, 1876 This register contains a census of Indians on the Cheyenne River Agency in 1876. The original is the property of the National Archives and was microfilmed at the request of the South Dakota State Historical Society in 1960. CONTENTS MF LOCATION Cheyenne River Agency Indian Register, 1876 9694 (Census Microfilm) Indian Census Rolls, 1892-1924 (M595). Because Indians on reservations were not citizens until 1974, nineteenth and early twentieth century census takers did not count Indians for congressional representation.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    FINAL REPORT Determination of river otter (Lontra canadensis) distribution and evaluation of potential sites for population expansion in South Dakota 1 October 2011 - 30 January 2015 Prepared for: Wildlife Diversity Program South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks Submitted by Wayne E. Melquist, Ph.D. CREX Consulting [email protected] May 2015 Grant Number T-55-R-1, Study No. 2465 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Completion of this project would have been immensely more challenging were it not for the support, cooperation, and encouragement of numerous South Dakota Game, Fish, and Parks (SDGFP) personnel. Silka Kempema, biologist with the Wildlife Diversity Program, was my primary contact in administering this contract, including multiple amendments. She never hesitated to assist in any way possible and enthusiastically joined me on floats down the Belle Fourche and Cheyenne Rivers. Silka has been a good companion and friend. Behind the scene, Eileen Dowd Stukel, head of the Wildlife Diversity Program, facilitated many aspects of the project and provided valuable input and review of the final report. Heather Berg, GIS Analyst, exhibited great patience with me during production of the maps found in the report, even when we went through multiple iterations before arriving at a final product. And Chelsea West, Heather’s supervisor, has provided me with graphic assistance for a decade of South Dakota projects. Jacquie Ermer, Regional Wildlife Manager, Watertown, conducted some of the early assessments of otters in South Dakota, and was a kindred spirit when it came to furbearers. The door was always open at the “Ermer Hotel” whenever I was in the Webster area, and I enjoyed sharing time with her family.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Pierre Area South Dakota
    Geology of the Pierre Area South Dakota GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 307 Geology of the Pierre Area South Dakota By DWIGHT R. CRANDELL GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 307 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1958 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract-__________________________________________ 1 Rock formations Continued Introduction_ ______________________________________ 2 Deposits of Recent and Pleistocene age Continued Location, culture, and accessibility. _____________ 2 Loess Continued Purpose and scope of study_ _____________________ 2 Buried soil profiles in loess_______________ 39 Field work and acknowledgments.- _____________ 3 Rate of loess accumulation_______________ 42 Earlier studies. ___ _________________________ 4 Spring deposits-_______________-__------____ 42 Geography_ _ _____________________________________ 4 Landslide deposits________________-_----____ 43 Relief and drainage.____________________________ 4 Fan deposits._____--_______-__-_-__-__-_--_ 43 Climate and vegetation.. ______________________ 5 Deposits of Recent age_________________________ 43 Soils._________________________________________ 6 Geomorphic development of the area in the Pleistocene Rock formations. __________________________________ 6 epoch ___________________________________________ 44 Precambrian rocks_ __________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Came for the Gold and Stayed for the Grass
    168 RANGELANDS 18(5), October1996 They Came for the Gold and Stayed for the Grass Bob Lee n island In a sea of grass. That's how historians South Dakota, part of the Louisiana Purchase, was describe the Black Hills of South Dakota where the included in Minnesota and Nebraska Territories until 1861 ASociety for Range Management will hold its 1997 when Dakota Territory was created. Lewis and Clark tra- annual meeting next February. That's because the incon- versed the region while boating up the Missourion their cel- gruous mountain range riseslike an island out of the sea of ebrated trek to the Pacific Ocean in 1804-06. When the grass that surrounds it for hundreds of miles in all direc- separate states of North and South Dakota were created in tions. They have also been described as "an oasis in a 1889, the southern sector was left with about 46 million dreary desert." That's because of their isolation, sparkling acres—43 million of it still rangeland.The state forms a near streams, pine-forested slopes, and park-like meadows ris- rectangle about 225 miles north to south and roughly 460 ing mirage-likefrom the stark prairielandsenveloping them. miles east to west. It encompasses a surface area of Known as "The Land of Infinite Variety," South Dakota is 77,047 square miles. divided into three distinct physiographic regions. The The Black Hills, an oblong area of about 4,500 square Missouri River bisects the state from north to south in the miles along the west-central border of South Dakota and central sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Sioux Reservation
    Great Sioux Reservation The Fort Laramie Treaty of 1868 set forth the original boundaries of the Great Sioux Reservation for the Lakota people-- including all of South Dakota west of the Missouri River. The Black Hills region was lost in 1877 as a result of Custer’s defeat at the Little Big Horn. When South Dakota became a state in 1889, the Great Sioux Reservation was divided into five smaller reservations (Pine Ridge, Rosebud, Lower Brule, Cheyenne River, and Standing Rock). Indian Census Rolls, 1892 (M595). Because Indians on reservations were not citizens until 1974, nineteenth and early twentieth century census takers did not count Indians for congressional representation. Instead, the U.S. government took special censuses in connection with Indian treaties, the last of which was in 1871. The result of many treaties was to extinguish Indian ties to land. Typically, the Indians agreed to reduce their landholdings or to move to an area less desired for white settlement. Some treaties provided for the dissolution of the tribes and the allotment of land to individual Indians. The censuses determined who was eligible for the allotments. These census rolls were usually submitted each year by agents or superintendents in charge of Indian reservations, as required by an act of July 4, 1884. The data on the rolls vary to some extent, but usually given are the English and/or Indian name of the person, roll number, age or date of birth, sex, and relationship to head of family. Beginning in 1930, the rolls also show the degree of Indian blood, marital status, ward status, place of residence, and sometimes other information.
    [Show full text]
  • DAKOTA RESOURCES | the Sitting Bull Surrender Census, Standing
    Copyright © 2010 by the South Dakota State Historical Society. All Rights Reserved. EPHRIAM D. DICKSON III Dakota Resources The Sitting Bull Surrender Census, Standing Rock Agency, 1881 During 1880 and 1881, Sitting Bull, his family, and members of the bands associated with him returned to the United States after a long exile in Canada, where they had taken refuge following the Great Sioux War of 1876–1877. Surrendering at Forts Buford and Keogh, they were trans- ported down the Missouri River to the Standing Rock Agency near their former homelands. There, a census taker visited the lodge of the famous Hunkpapa leader. Speaking fluent Lakota, the enumerator re- corded the name of each woman and child in Sitting Bull’s family, as well as their age, sex, and relationship to the household head. The cen- sus taker even noted how many dogs the family owned (they had two) and the approximate number of buffalo and deer they had successfully hunted in the past year (he reported 150 deer and 300 buffalo). For Sitting Bull and other Lakota leaders, the census enumeration was a new experience, one of many strange and often intrusive bureaucratic processes the Hunkpapas endured as they settled into reservation life. For officials in the Office of Indian Affairs, the census was an important administrative document, one that over time became a powerful tool in their ongoing effort to transform American Indian identities and communities. Today, early reservation records such as censuses, annuity rolls, and issue lists provide historians a rare glimpse of American Indian com- munities as they existed on the threshold of tremendous change.
    [Show full text]