YGB 2013-2014 Brochure Web.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
North Interstate Corridor Plan
Adopted NORTH INTERSTATE CORRIDOR PLAN THEN . .NOW . THE FUTURE CITY OF PORTLAND BUREAU of PLANNING August 2008 north interstate corridor plan Interstate North Interstate Corridor Plan Adopted by the Portland City Council July 23, 2008 Ordinance No. 182072 Effective August 22, 2008 The Bureau of Planning is committed to providing equal access to information and hearings. If you need special accommodation, please call 503-823-7700 (TTY 503-823-6868). CITY OF PORTLAND BUREAU of PLANNING For more information on the North Interstate Corridor Plan please contact: Julia Gisler, Project Manager Portland Bureau of Planning 1900 SW 4th Ave, Ste 7100 Portland OR 97201 Phone: 503-823-7624 Interstate north interstate corridor plan Interstate Acknowledgements Portland City Council Bureau of Planning Tom Potter, Mayor Gil Kelley, Planning Director Sam Adams, Commissioner Joe Zehnder, Principal Planner Nick Fish, Commissioner Deborah Stein, District Planning Manager Randy Leonard, Commissioner Dan Saltzman, Commissioner Project Management Team Erik Sten, Commissioner (through March 2008) Julia Gisler, Project Manager Bureau of Planning Portland Planning Commission Kevin Cronin, Portland Development Commission Don Hanson, President (PDC) Amy Cortese, Vice President Courtney Duke, Portland Office of Transportation Michelle Rudd, Vice President (PDOT) André Baugh Catherine Ciarlo Project Staff Larry Hilderbrand Mark Raggett, Planning Howard Shapiro Christine Caruso, Bureau of Development Jill Sherman Services (Planning through Dec. 2007) Irma Valdez Kim -
Annual Budget for the Fiscal Year 2007/08 School District No
Annual Budget For the fiscal year 2007/08 School District No. 1, Multnomah County, Oregon Portland Public Schools Cover Photo: Rosa Parks Elementary School 8960 N. Woolsey, Constructed in 2006 Portland Public Schools Nondiscrimination Statement Portland Public Schools recognizes the diversity and worth of all individuals and groups and their roles in society. All individuals and groups shall be treated with fairness in all activities, programs and operations, without regard to age, color, creed, disability, mari- tal status, national origin, race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation. Board of Education Policy 1.80.020-P This page intentionally left blank. 2007/08 School District No. 1, Multnomah County, Oregon Table of Contents for this Section Section I - Introductory Information Superintendent’s Proposed Budget Message ...........................................................................................3 Citizen Budget Review Committee Report ...............................................................................................7 Finance, Audit & Operations Committee Report ......................................................................................9 School Staffing Formula School Staffing Formulas ..........................................................................................................12 Special Education and ESL/Bilingual Staffing .............................................................................15 Grants, Special Revenue & Title I ..............................................................................................15 -
TAG Parent Survey Results 2012 V2.Xlsx-Comments
www.ppstag.org TAG parent survey results 2012 v2.xlsx-comments www.ppstag.org A B C NOTE: These comments have been edited to remove personal information, replacing, for example, names of students, by "my son" or "our daughter". Please email [email protected] if you find any 1 remaining personal information that should be removed. 2 3 School_Name comment1 (positive aspects) comment2 (suggested improvements) Abernethy E.S. We love our school and teachers, but I have to say there has not been very clear communication from about exactly how and what TAG services are being provided, if any. My child's teachers have been very good about working with her particular strengths and weaknesses as a student, but it has not been clear whether her TAG status fits into their plan. More specific information about TAG services at our school would be helpful. 21 22 Abernethy E.S. Abernethy E.S. Don't think there are any at this point. Pull out! In my son's old school, he had a pull out one day a week. That was the ONLY day he was excited to go to school. He was able to be in a class of his PEERS, so that they understood where he was coming from. The other four days (even though he missed one day a week) he 23 was extremely bored, which led to bad behaviors. 25 Abernethy E.S. Abernethy E.S. She has attention from the teacher that guides her to appropriate individual challenges. Enhanced Group challenges with tag students on similar or equal level would help with 28 motivation and engagement. -
AGENDA 1. STUDENT and PUBLIC COMMENT 6:00 Pm 2
BOARD OF EDUCATION BOARD AUDITORIUM Portland Public Schools Blanchard Education Service Center REGULAR MEETING 501 N. Dixon Street February 26, 2019 Portland, OR, 97227 Note: Those wishing to speak before the School Board should sign the public comment sheet prior to the start of the meeting. No additional speakers will be accepted after the sign-in sheet is removed, but testifiers are welcome to sign up for the next meeting. While the School Board wants to hear from the public, comments must be limited to three minutes. All those testifying must abide by the Board’s Rules of Conduct for Board meetings. Public comment related to an action item on the agenda will be heard immediately following staff presentation on that issue. Public comment on all other matters will be heard during the “Public Comment” time. This meeting may be taped and televised by the media. AGENDA 1. STUDENT AND PUBLIC COMMENT 6:00 pm 2. RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF EDUCATION FUNDING TO THE 6:30 pm LEVEL RECOMMENDED BY THE QUALITY EDUCATION MODEL (public comment accepted) 3 SUPERINTENDENT’S REPORT 6:40 pm 4. TRILLIUM CHARTER SCHOOL -- vote 6:50 pm (public comment accepted) 5. MULTIPLE PATHWAYS TO GRADUATION LOCATION ANALYSIS 7:25 pm (public comment accepted) 6: POLICY FIRST READING / INFORMATION: 8:00 pm a. Compulsory Enrollment; Age and Grade Level at Entrance – Policy 4.10.020-P b. Field Trips, Foreign Travel, and other Off-Campus Activities – Policy 6.50.010-P 7. BUSINESS AGENDA – vote 8:15 pm (public comment accepted) 8. BOARD COMMITTEE AND CONFERENCE REPORTS; 8:25 pm STUDENT REPRESENTATIVE REPORT 9. -
District-Wide Enrollment Balancing Recommendations Carole Smith, Superintendent March 29, 2016
District-wide Enrollment Balancing Recommendations Carole Smith, Superintendent March 29, 2016 Superintendent Carole Smith • District-wide Enrollment Balancing Recommendations • March 29, 2016 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Context for Enrollment Balancing .............................................................................................. 5 Community Involvement in Enrollment Balancing .............................................................. 7 Gratitude and Recognition .......................................................................................................... 12 Grade Reconfiguration Recommendations ........................................................................... 13 Fall 2016 ........................................................................................................................................................... 14 Recommendation: Ockley Green Middle School ............................................................................................................ 14 Fall 2017 ........................................................................................................................................................... 15 Recommendation: Harriet TuBman Middle School and Roseway Heights Middle School .......................... 15 Recommendation: Harriet TuBman Middle School ..................................................................................................... -
Recommendations on Balancing Enrollment in Portland Public Schools
Recommendations on Balancing Enrollment in Portland Public Schools Prepared for Superintendent Carole Smith by the District-wide Boundary Review Advisory Committee Tuesday, February 9, 2016 Recommendations on Balancing Enrollment in Portland Public Schools Prepared for Superintendent Carole Smith by the District-wide Boundary Review Advisory Committee Tuesday, February 9, 2016 D-BRAC Recommendations on Enrollment Balancing Components • Tuesday, February 9, 2016 Contents Overview .......................................................................................................................................6 Context ..........................................................................................................................................7 History ................................................................................................................................................... 7 The opportunity: strong schools for all students .................................................................................. 7 Superintendent appoints advisory committee ..................................................................................... 8 Values Framework guides work ............................................................................................................ 9 Limitations of K-8 schools emerge ...................................................................................................... 10 K-8 reconfiguration takes center stage .............................................................................................. -
Board of Directors
BOARD OF EDUCATION SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1J, MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON INDEX TO THE MINUTES REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING July 19, 2010 Board Action Number Page Personnel 4304 Election of Probationary Administrators.................................................................................... 5 4305 Election of Temporary Administrators....................................................................................... 5 4306 Appointment of Temporary Teachers and Notice of Nonrenewal............................................. 6 4307 Recommended Grievance Decision (Grievance “A”): Employee #010380 ............................. 6 4308 Recommended Grievance Decision (Grievance “B”): Employee #010380 ............................. 6 4309 Recommended Grievance Decision (Grievance “C”): Employee #010380 ............................. 7 4310 Recommended Grievance Decision (Grievance “D”): Employee #010380 ............................. 7 4311 Recommended Termination Decision: Employee #013752 .................................................... 7 Purchases, Bids, Contracts 4312 Revenue Contracts that Exceed $25,000 Limit for Delegation of Authority.............................. 9 4313 Expenditure Contracts that Exceed $25,000 Limit for Delegation of Authority....................... 10 Other Matters Requiring Board Action 4314 Naming Resolution for César Chávez K-8 School (formerly Clarendon-Portsmouth K-8) ..... 18 4315 Amendment to Resolution No. 4297 (“Adoption of the 2010-11 Budget for School District No. 1J, Multnomah County, Oregon”)............................................................ -
Literary Arts Annual Report
LITERARY ARTS ANNUAL REPORT 2016 2017 At Literary Arts, we seek to foster a lifelong love of literature, WORDS FROM THE DIRECTOR WHO WE ARE as well as to strengthen our community of artists who make it. Literary Arts Staff Bob Speltz Andrew Proctor, Executive Thomas Wood Director The stories we tell about ourselves define who we Patron Advisory Council Maggie Allen Together with our staff, volunteers, partners, and donors, Amanda Bullock Susan Hathaway-Marxer, are. The stories we read or listen to help to define our Co-chair Jae Choi Co-chair worldview. When people are given the time and the Lydah DeBin James Reinhart, Literary Arts served more than 20,000 Oregonians last year. Megan Gex Seth Alley resources to tell their own stories, they are empowered. Jennifer Gurney Nancy Bragdon Readers engaged in rich literary experiences at the concert India Hamilton Marian Creamer When they are given an audience, we strengthen our Hunt Holman Ann Emmerson Ramiza Koya Sara Guest community through shared experience. Marshall Miller Phillip M. Margolin hall, in our community space, and on the radio. Students Susan Moore Carolyn McKinney Alex Ney Vanessa McLaughlin Denver Olmstead Deidra Miner were inspired by teaching artists, visiting authors, and Tens of thousands of people take part in our Liz Olufson Katherine O’Neil Chelsea Querner Corrine Oishi programming each year. They are of all ages and come Mary Rechner Nancy Ponzi volunteer mentors. Local writers received support through Joanna Rose Dru Rosenthal from all over the state. Their large numbers remind Dao Strom Barbara Sepenuk Mel Wells Roslyn Sutherland grants, awards, and residencies. -
Building the Framework for Boundary Review. an Assessment of PPS’S Organizational Readiness and Options for Citizen Engagement
Portland State University PDXScholar Center for Public Service Publications and Reports Center for Public Service 5-2-2014 Complex Challenges and New Opportunities: Building the Framework for Boundary Review. An Assessment of PPS’s Organizational Readiness and Options for Citizen Engagement Portland State University. Hatfield School of Government Shannon Grzybowski Portland State University Marcus Ingle Portland State University Phil Keisling Portland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/publicservice_pub Doug Morgan Por tlandPart of State the EUnivducationersity Policy Commons, and the Public Administration Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y See next page for additional authors Citation Details Portland State University. Hatfield School of Government; Grzybowski, Shannon; Ingle, Marcus; Keisling, Phil; Morgan, Doug; Read, Tobias; Giles, Sarah; Jacks, Jim; and Willis, Wendy, "Complex Challenges and New Opportunities: Building the Framework for Boundary Review. An Assessment of PPS’s Organizational Readiness and Options for Citizen Engagement" (2014). Center for Public Service Publications and Reports. 28. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/publicservice_pub/28 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Center for Public Service Publications and Reports by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Authors Portland State University. Hatfield School of Government, Shannon Grzybowski, Marcus Ingle, Phil Keisling, Doug Morgan, Tobias Read, Sarah Giles, Jim Jacks, and Wendy Willis This report is available at PDXScholar: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/publicservice_pub/28 Complex Challenges and New Opportunities: Building the Framework for Boundary Review An Assessment of PPS’s Organizational Readiness and Options for Citizen Engagement Prepared by: The Center for Public Service Mark O. -
Bringing Off-Track Youth Into the Center of High School Reform Lessons and Tools from Leading Communities
bringing off-track youth into the center of high school reform lessons and tools from leading communities June 2009 his toolkit was prepared by Jobs for the future’s Connected by 25 team. t Connected by 25 focuses on creating the systemic and policy changes necessary to develop and support effective models that prepare students who are not on track to graduation to complete high school and advance along pathways to postsecondary credentials. This toolkit would not be possible without the vision and persistent efforts of the people and communities that have been the pioneers in this work. Many of the tools draw directly on materials developed in those front-runner cities. In the communities funded through the Youth Transition Funders Group (YTFG) Strategic Assessment Initiative, we are indebted to: Boston: Kathy Hamilton, Kathi Mullin, and Neil Sullivan Las Vegas: Chanda Cook and Hilarie Robison New York City: Michele Cahill, Leah Hamilton, Peter Kleinbard, and JoEllen Lynch Philadelphia: Jenny Bogoni, Harvey Chism, Allie Mulvihill, and Laura Shubilla Portland, OR: Leslie Rennie-Hill, Carole Smith, and Zeke Smith San Jose: Matt Hamer and Maria Elena Riddle Washington, DC: Mark Ouellette and Greg Roberts These leaders, of course, worked with countless others inside and outside of their districts to envision, design, and implement reforms. The toolkit also owes a debt to the researchers who have helped to bring a sharp focus to this agenda, including Robert Balfanz of Johns Hopkins University; Liza Herzog of the Philadelphia Education Fund; Elaine Allensworth, John Q. Easton, and Melissa Roderick of the Consortium on Chicago School Research; and Lisa Cloitre and Tammy Battaglino of the Parthenon Group. -
OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED JULY 25, 2017 $388,850,000(1) School District No
COMPETITIVE SALE—The Bonds will be sold pursuant to competitive sales held at 9:00 and 9:30 a.m. (Pacific Time) on August 3, 2017, as further described in the Notices of Sale attached hereto. PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED JULY 25, 2017 $388,850,000(1) School District No. 1J, Multnomah County, Oregon (Portland Public Schools) Multnomah, Washington, and Clackamas Counties, Oregon General Obligation Bonds, Series 2017 $168,950,000(1) Series 2017A $219,900,000 (1) Series 2017B (Federally Taxable) (Tax-Exempt) DATED: August 10, 2017 (estimated “Date of Delivery”) DUE: June 15, as shown on the inside cover PURPOSE— The $168,950,000(1) General Obligation Bonds, Series 2017A (Federally Taxable) (the “2017A Bonds”) and $219,900,000(1) General Obligation Bonds, Series 2017B (Tax-Exempt) (the “2017B Bonds,” collectively with the 2017A Bonds, the “Bonds”) are being issued by School District No. 1J, Multnomah County, Oregon (Portland Public Schools) (the “District”), located in Multnomah, Washington, and Clackamas Counties, Oregon. The Bonds are being issued to finance capital costs for the District, and to pay the costs of issuance of the Bonds. See “Purpose and Use of Proceeds” herein. MOODY’S AND S&P GLOBAL RATINGS— “Aa2” and “AA-” underlying “Aa1” and “AA+,” enhanced. See “Oregon School Bond Guaranty” and “Ratings” herein. NOT BANK QUALIFIED— The District has NOT designated the Bonds as “qualified tax-exempt obligations” for purposes of Section 265(b)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM— The Bonds will be issued, executed and delivered in fully registered form under a book- entry only system and registered in the name of Cede & Co., as owner and nominee for The Depository Trust Company OfficialStatement substantially in this form. -
Gifts to Multnomah County Organizations, 1997—2005 Year Contrib
Giving In Oregon, 2007 Report on Philanthropy Gifts to Multnomah County Organizations, 1997—2005 Year Contrib. # Orgs Amount 700,000,000 2005 $638,454,070 2,373 Change from last year: 11.85% 600,000,000 2004 $570,794,797 2,402 500,000,000 2003 $611,604,173 2,339 400,000,000 2002 $482,715,637 2,272 300,000,000 2001 $484,691,628 2,212 200,000,000 2000 $482,128,510 2,128 100,000,000 1999 $477,252,072 2,116 Overall change, 1997 through 2005: 50.54% 0 1998 $397,815,248 2,045 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1997 $424,104,172 1,950 Towns in Multnomah County: Beavercreek; Bridal Veil; Corbett; Fairview; Gresham; Happy Valley; Interlachen; Milwaukie; Portland; Tigard; Troutdale; Wood Village. Data: Oregon Attorney General Charitable Activities Section Giving In Oregon, 2007 Report on Philanthropy Charitable Donations by County — 2005 MULTNOMAH COUNTY — by NTEE Category NTEE Description (NTEE = National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities) Aggregate Donations Revenue Education $139,163,627 $675,802,072 Philanthropy & volunteerism $110,454,544 $200,112,920 Human services—other, multi-purpose $110,014,022 $437,050,532 Arts, culture, humanities $75,659,080 $204,321,684 Health, general, rehabilitative $57,565,389 $4,432,898,794 Environmental quality, protection $44,487,993 $151,886,362 Youth development $18,195,503 $51,800,419 Religion, spiritual development $15,020,185 $29,325,976 Animal-related activities $12,711,953 $21,504,940 Public affairs, society benefit $6,881,783 $13,100,435 Recreation, leisure, sports, athletics $6,809,929 $22,755,786