BEFORE the OFFICE of ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE of OREGON for the SECRETARY of STATE ELECTIONS DIVISION

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BEFORE the OFFICE of ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE of OREGON for the SECRETARY of STATE ELECTIONS DIVISION BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE OF OREGON for the SECRETARY OF STATE ELECTIONS DIVISION IN THE MATTER OF: ) PROPOSED ORDER ) SARAH AMES, ) OAH Case No.: 1102579 Respondent ) Agency Case No.: 11-102-SA HISTORY OF THE CASE On August 24, 2011, the Elections Division (Division) issued a Notice of a Final Determination and Intent to Impose a Civil Penalty; Contested Case Notice and Opportunity to be Heard, and Final Order by Default Imposing Civil Penalty if No Request for Hearing is Received (Notice of Violation) to Sarah Ames (Ames).1 On August 24, 2011, the Division issued a Notice of Violation to Katherine Essick (Essick). On October 25, 2011, Ames and Essick both requested a hearing. On October 26, 2011, the Division referred the hearing requests to the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) and requested that the cases be consolidated for hearing. Senior Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Dove L. Gutman was assigned to preside at hearing. On February 13, 2012, a consolidated hearing was held in Salem, Oregon. ALJ Gutman presided. Nancy Hungerford, Attorney at Law, represented Ames and Essick. 2 Assistant Attorney General Lynn Rosik represented the Division. Ames and Alana Cox, a Division Compliance Specialist, both testified. On March 5, 2012, the hearing reconvened. ALJ Gutman presided. Ms. Hungerford represented Ames and Essick. Ms. Rosik represented the Division. Ames and Essick both testified. The record was held open to receive closing arguments and reply briefs. On March 30, 2012, the Division and Ms. Hungerford filed closing arguments. On April 13, 2012, the Division filed a reply brief. On April 16, 2012, Ms. Rosik submitted copies of Exhibit C1 pages 62-68. 3 The record closed on April 16, 2012. ISSUES 1. Whether Ames violated ORS 260.432(2). 2. Whether a civil penalty in the amount of $75 shall be imposed against Ames. 1 The Notice of Violation is dated August 24, 2011 but was mailed on August 25, 2011. 2 The companion case is OAH Case No. 1102578. 3 The pages were missing from the record. In the Matter of Sarah Ames , OAH Case No. 1102579 Page 1 of 103 EVIDENTIARY RULING Division. Exhibits A through F were admitted into evidence without objection. Ames. Exhibits 2 through 4, 6 through 12, and 14 through 19 were admitted into evidence without objection. Page 2 of Exhibit 1 was admitted into evidence without objection. Page 1 of Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 13 were withdrawn by Ames. Exhibit 5 was admitted into the record over the Division’s relevance objection. FINDINGS OF FACT Background 1. In 2010 and 2011, Carole Smith was the Superintendent of Portland Public Schools (PPS); Jollee Patterson was general counsel at PPS; and Jeff Condit was outside counsel for PPS. Among other things, Ms. Patterson and Mr. Condit were responsible for reviewing materials for compliance with election law. (Test. of Ames; Ex. C1 at 1-3.) 2. In 2010 and 2011, Robb Cowie was the Executive Director of Community Involvement and Public Affairs (CIPA) at PPS; C.J. Sylvester was the Chief Operating Officer of CIPA; Ames was the Public Affairs Director of CIPA; Matt Shelby was the Public Information Officer of CIPA; Kathryn Essick (Essick) was the Family Communications Manager of CIPA; and Brian Christopher (Christopher), Francisco Garcia (Garcia), and Richard Martin (Martin) were part of the Educational Media Services of CIPA. (Test. of Ames, Essick; Ex. C1 at 1-3.) 3. Mr. Cowie was the supervisor of Ames and Essick. Ames was the point person for bond communications. She was responsible for drafting and editing materials. Essick was responsible for copy editing and oversight of the PPS Pulse, a monthly e-newsletter sent to approximately 40,000 members of the PPS community. Christopher, Garcia, and Martin provided technical production support in graphic design and web posting. (Test. of Ames, Essick, Ex. C1 at 1-3.) 4. The Portland School District is located in Washington, Clackamas, and Multnomah counties. (Test. of Cox.) 5. On or about November 8, 2010, Superintendent Smith proposed a bond measure to the Portland Public Schools Board of Directors. (Test. of Ames; Ex. C1 at 78.) 6. On December 8, 2010, a document entitled “Frequently Asked Questions: The PPS School Modernization Proposal” was posted on the PPS website. The document answered many of the questions posed to PPS by community members.4 The document provided, in part: 1. How big is Portland Public Schools? 4 The document consists of thirty-nine questions and answers. (Ex. C1 at 67-78.) In the Matter of Sarah Ames , OAH Case No. 1102579 Page 2 of 103 Portland Public Schools is the largest school district in Oregon with roughly 47,000 students in 85 schools, including neighborhood and focus schools, in addition to charters, alternatives and special programs. Portland Public Schools is the second largest property owner in the city and one of the region’s largest employers with more than 6,000 teachers and school support staff. 2. How old are the school buildings? The average age of PPS schools is 65 years old. Most were built either in the 1920s or just after World War II. Only two schools have been built in the last 40 years (Rosa Parks Elementary in North Portland and Forest Park K-8 in Northwest). While PPS has added computers and other technology to schools, and has addressed some of the most urgent building needs – such as earthquake safety and roof replacement – our school buildings have never been fully updated. 3. Why is Superintendent Carole Smith proposing a bond measure? PPS students do not have the same up-to-date classroom equipment, technology and other modern learning spaces as students in the neighboring school districts with newer buildings. PPS school buildings have never been fully updated. The buildings have worn out with leaking roofs and drafty windows; energy-inefficient and antiquated heating, ventilation and plumbing systems; overtaxed electrical systems with few outlets and outdated safety systems. A bond will provide dedicated money to address these needs and provide student and teachers with modernized schools. Without a bond, Portland Public Schools must continue to use scarce operating dollars for the most urgent building needs. 4. What will the proposed school building bond buy? All 85 schools will receive one-time student safety, security and building system updates, such as: replacing roofs, updating boilers, improving accessibility for disabled students and adults, and increasing student safety and security by installing new fire alarm systems, making seismic upgrades and providing secure access at entryways. In the Matter of Sarah Ames , OAH Case No. 1102579 Page 3 of 103 All schools will receive updates to classroom learning environments and updated teaching technology. Every K-8 and middle school (37 schools) will have an upgraded science lab, and 33 elementary and K-8 schools will have covered playground areas for outdoor physical education and recreational use. Six high schools not being rebuilt will have classroom updates to support rigorous teaching and learning, and will receive updates to their sites, such as landscaping, seed money for field upgrades, lighting, signage, walkways and renovated entrances. Schools across the city with high-priority needs – out-dated educational environments and safety and structural concerns – will be rebuilt. Three high schools and five elementary and K-8 schools will be rebuilt and modernized, so PPS students have the same technology, equipment and up-to-date learning environments as students in neighboring school districts with newer buildings. The schools are Cleveland, Jefferson and Roosevelt high schools, and Faubion, Laurelhurst, Markham, Marysville and Rigler elementary and K-8 schools. In addition, Lincoln will undergo comprehensive planning and design to prepare it for rebuilding in the next voter-approved bond. To lower costs and save taxpayer funds, debt will be retired on funds borrowed to complete Rosa Parks School and the nine school roofing projects completed in 2009 that included seismic upgrades and solar energy collection. ***** 9. What will the initial proposed construction bond cost me? This bond will raise $548 million for classroom, safety and security improvements at every school in the district over six years. The typical homeowner would pay about $300 a year, or about $25 per month. The proposed bond’s rate – approximately $2 per $1,000 of taxable assessed value – is in the middle of the rates voters approved in neighboring school districts, which range from about $1 to over $4 in some school districts. Portland Metro Area School Districts FACILITIES BOND RATE Gladstone $4.54 Sherwood $4.07 Forest Grove $3.53 In the Matter of Sarah Ames , OAH Case No. 1102579 Page 4 of 103 West Linn-Wilsonville $2.97 Riverdale $2.85 Hillsboro $2.61 Corbett $2.55 Canby $2.31 Oregon Trail $2.27 Centennial $2.26 Beaverton $2.09 North Clackamas $2.08 David Douglas $1.61 Oregon City $1.41 Tigard-Tualatin $1.38 Reynolds $1.13 Parkrose $1.08 Gresham Barlow $1.06 Lake Oswego $1.04 Portland Public Schools $0.00 AVERAGE $2.25 The median home in the Portland Public Schools district is worth $277,700 (Real Market Value) and is taxed at a value of $147,500 (Taxable Assessed Value). Half of the homes are worth more, half less. To calculate your own cost, multiply the Taxable Assessed Value (TAV) on your bill by $2 and then divide by 1,000. That’s the approximate annual rate; if you pay monthly escrow, divide by 12 for your monthly cost. Portland Public Schools’ taxes are just over a quarter of local property tax bills, 27 percent. Although overall property tax rates are higher in Portland than in surrounding areas, which is due to other government authorities’ tax rates, as [sic] school property taxes are lower.
Recommended publications
  • Annual Budget for the Fiscal Year 2007/08 School District No
    Annual Budget For the fiscal year 2007/08 School District No. 1, Multnomah County, Oregon Portland Public Schools Cover Photo: Rosa Parks Elementary School 8960 N. Woolsey, Constructed in 2006 Portland Public Schools Nondiscrimination Statement Portland Public Schools recognizes the diversity and worth of all individuals and groups and their roles in society. All individuals and groups shall be treated with fairness in all activities, programs and operations, without regard to age, color, creed, disability, mari- tal status, national origin, race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation. Board of Education Policy 1.80.020-P This page intentionally left blank. 2007/08 School District No. 1, Multnomah County, Oregon Table of Contents for this Section Section I - Introductory Information Superintendent’s Proposed Budget Message ...........................................................................................3 Citizen Budget Review Committee Report ...............................................................................................7 Finance, Audit & Operations Committee Report ......................................................................................9 School Staffing Formula School Staffing Formulas ..........................................................................................................12 Special Education and ESL/Bilingual Staffing .............................................................................15 Grants, Special Revenue & Title I ..............................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • District-Wide Enrollment Balancing Recommendations Carole Smith, Superintendent March 29, 2016
    District-wide Enrollment Balancing Recommendations Carole Smith, Superintendent March 29, 2016 Superintendent Carole Smith • District-wide Enrollment Balancing Recommendations • March 29, 2016 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Context for Enrollment Balancing .............................................................................................. 5 Community Involvement in Enrollment Balancing .............................................................. 7 Gratitude and Recognition .......................................................................................................... 12 Grade Reconfiguration Recommendations ........................................................................... 13 Fall 2016 ........................................................................................................................................................... 14 Recommendation: Ockley Green Middle School ............................................................................................................ 14 Fall 2017 ........................................................................................................................................................... 15 Recommendation: Harriet TuBman Middle School and Roseway Heights Middle School .......................... 15 Recommendation: Harriet TuBman Middle School .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations on Balancing Enrollment in Portland Public Schools
    Recommendations on Balancing Enrollment in Portland Public Schools Prepared for Superintendent Carole Smith by the District-wide Boundary Review Advisory Committee Tuesday, February 9, 2016 Recommendations on Balancing Enrollment in Portland Public Schools Prepared for Superintendent Carole Smith by the District-wide Boundary Review Advisory Committee Tuesday, February 9, 2016 D-BRAC Recommendations on Enrollment Balancing Components • Tuesday, February 9, 2016 Contents Overview .......................................................................................................................................6 Context ..........................................................................................................................................7 History ................................................................................................................................................... 7 The opportunity: strong schools for all students .................................................................................. 7 Superintendent appoints advisory committee ..................................................................................... 8 Values Framework guides work ............................................................................................................ 9 Limitations of K-8 schools emerge ...................................................................................................... 10 K-8 reconfiguration takes center stage ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Directors
    BOARD OF EDUCATION SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1J, MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON INDEX TO THE MINUTES REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING July 19, 2010 Board Action Number Page Personnel 4304 Election of Probationary Administrators.................................................................................... 5 4305 Election of Temporary Administrators....................................................................................... 5 4306 Appointment of Temporary Teachers and Notice of Nonrenewal............................................. 6 4307 Recommended Grievance Decision (Grievance “A”): Employee #010380 ............................. 6 4308 Recommended Grievance Decision (Grievance “B”): Employee #010380 ............................. 6 4309 Recommended Grievance Decision (Grievance “C”): Employee #010380 ............................. 7 4310 Recommended Grievance Decision (Grievance “D”): Employee #010380 ............................. 7 4311 Recommended Termination Decision: Employee #013752 .................................................... 7 Purchases, Bids, Contracts 4312 Revenue Contracts that Exceed $25,000 Limit for Delegation of Authority.............................. 9 4313 Expenditure Contracts that Exceed $25,000 Limit for Delegation of Authority....................... 10 Other Matters Requiring Board Action 4314 Naming Resolution for César Chávez K-8 School (formerly Clarendon-Portsmouth K-8) ..... 18 4315 Amendment to Resolution No. 4297 (“Adoption of the 2010-11 Budget for School District No. 1J, Multnomah County, Oregon”)............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Literary Arts Annual Report
    LITERARY ARTS ANNUAL REPORT 2016 2017 At Literary Arts, we seek to foster a lifelong love of literature, WORDS FROM THE DIRECTOR WHO WE ARE as well as to strengthen our community of artists who make it. Literary Arts Staff Bob Speltz Andrew Proctor, Executive Thomas Wood Director The stories we tell about ourselves define who we Patron Advisory Council Maggie Allen Together with our staff, volunteers, partners, and donors, Amanda Bullock Susan Hathaway-Marxer, are. The stories we read or listen to help to define our Co-chair Jae Choi Co-chair worldview. When people are given the time and the Lydah DeBin James Reinhart, Literary Arts served more than 20,000 Oregonians last year. Megan Gex Seth Alley resources to tell their own stories, they are empowered. Jennifer Gurney Nancy Bragdon Readers engaged in rich literary experiences at the concert India Hamilton Marian Creamer When they are given an audience, we strengthen our Hunt Holman Ann Emmerson Ramiza Koya Sara Guest community through shared experience. Marshall Miller Phillip M. Margolin hall, in our community space, and on the radio. Students Susan Moore Carolyn McKinney Alex Ney Vanessa McLaughlin Denver Olmstead Deidra Miner were inspired by teaching artists, visiting authors, and Tens of thousands of people take part in our Liz Olufson Katherine O’Neil Chelsea Querner Corrine Oishi programming each year. They are of all ages and come Mary Rechner Nancy Ponzi volunteer mentors. Local writers received support through Joanna Rose Dru Rosenthal from all over the state. Their large numbers remind Dao Strom Barbara Sepenuk Mel Wells Roslyn Sutherland grants, awards, and residencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Building the Framework for Boundary Review. an Assessment of PPS’S Organizational Readiness and Options for Citizen Engagement
    Portland State University PDXScholar Center for Public Service Publications and Reports Center for Public Service 5-2-2014 Complex Challenges and New Opportunities: Building the Framework for Boundary Review. An Assessment of PPS’s Organizational Readiness and Options for Citizen Engagement Portland State University. Hatfield School of Government Shannon Grzybowski Portland State University Marcus Ingle Portland State University Phil Keisling Portland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/publicservice_pub Doug Morgan Por tlandPart of State the EUnivducationersity Policy Commons, and the Public Administration Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y See next page for additional authors Citation Details Portland State University. Hatfield School of Government; Grzybowski, Shannon; Ingle, Marcus; Keisling, Phil; Morgan, Doug; Read, Tobias; Giles, Sarah; Jacks, Jim; and Willis, Wendy, "Complex Challenges and New Opportunities: Building the Framework for Boundary Review. An Assessment of PPS’s Organizational Readiness and Options for Citizen Engagement" (2014). Center for Public Service Publications and Reports. 28. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/publicservice_pub/28 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Center for Public Service Publications and Reports by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Authors Portland State University. Hatfield School of Government, Shannon Grzybowski, Marcus Ingle, Phil Keisling, Doug Morgan, Tobias Read, Sarah Giles, Jim Jacks, and Wendy Willis This report is available at PDXScholar: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/publicservice_pub/28 Complex Challenges and New Opportunities: Building the Framework for Boundary Review An Assessment of PPS’s Organizational Readiness and Options for Citizen Engagement Prepared by: The Center for Public Service Mark O.
    [Show full text]
  • YGB 2013-2014 Brochure Web.Pdf
    “Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.” –Nelson Mandela It is always a pleasure to recognize the students selected for the Young, Gifted and Black program. Please join me in commending these exceptional young people, and thank them for their dedication to excellence. Congratulations to our honorees, and all those who nurtured their talents and gifts. Carole Smith Superintendent Portland Public Schools Young, Gifted and Black Wednesday, May 14, 2014 Lift Ev’ry Voice and Sing Alonzo Chadwick, vocalist Michael Dean, pianist Graduates of Jefferson High School Greeting of Guests/Welcome Carole Smith, Superintendent Portland Public Schools Dream Keeper Reiko Williams, Assistant Principal Rosa Parks Elementary School Introduction of Speaker Dr. Keith Dempsey Assistant Professor, Counseling George Fox University Graduate of Benson High School Keynote Address Charles McGee President and CEO of Black Parent Initiative (BPI) Graduate of Franklin High School Recognition of Parents/Families/Guests Greg Belisle, Board of Education Portland Public Schools Presentation of Honorees Carolyn Leonard Retired Administrator Portland Public School Graduate of Girls Polytechnic High School A Tribute Esther R. Harris, J.D. Special Education Family & Community Liaison Portland Public Schools Closing Remarks Macarre Traynham, Principal Metropolitan Learning Center Portland Public Schools To Be Young, Gifted and Black Alonzo Chadwick, vocalist Michael Dean, pianist Lift Ev’ry Voice and Sing by James Weldon Johnson Lift ev’ry voice and sing, Till earth and heaven ring, Ring with the harmonies of Liberty; Let our rejoicing rise High as the list’ning skies, Let it resound loud as the rolling sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing Off-Track Youth Into the Center of High School Reform Lessons and Tools from Leading Communities
    bringing off-track youth into the center of high school reform lessons and tools from leading communities June 2009 his toolkit was prepared by Jobs for the future’s Connected by 25 team. t Connected by 25 focuses on creating the systemic and policy changes necessary to develop and support effective models that prepare students who are not on track to graduation to complete high school and advance along pathways to postsecondary credentials. This toolkit would not be possible without the vision and persistent efforts of the people and communities that have been the pioneers in this work. Many of the tools draw directly on materials developed in those front-runner cities. In the communities funded through the Youth Transition Funders Group (YTFG) Strategic Assessment Initiative, we are indebted to: Boston: Kathy Hamilton, Kathi Mullin, and Neil Sullivan Las Vegas: Chanda Cook and Hilarie Robison New York City: Michele Cahill, Leah Hamilton, Peter Kleinbard, and JoEllen Lynch Philadelphia: Jenny Bogoni, Harvey Chism, Allie Mulvihill, and Laura Shubilla Portland, OR: Leslie Rennie-Hill, Carole Smith, and Zeke Smith San Jose: Matt Hamer and Maria Elena Riddle Washington, DC: Mark Ouellette and Greg Roberts These leaders, of course, worked with countless others inside and outside of their districts to envision, design, and implement reforms. The toolkit also owes a debt to the researchers who have helped to bring a sharp focus to this agenda, including Robert Balfanz of Johns Hopkins University; Liza Herzog of the Philadelphia Education Fund; Elaine Allensworth, John Q. Easton, and Melissa Roderick of the Consortium on Chicago School Research; and Lisa Cloitre and Tammy Battaglino of the Parthenon Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Portland Public Schools High School System Design Superintendent's
    Portland Public Schools High School System Design Superintendent’s Recommendations Superintendent Carole Smith Submitted to the Portland School Board April 26, 2010 Updated: 05/04/2010 High School System Design — Superintendent’s Recommendations Contents Transmittal letter from the Superintendent ..........................................................................................4 A vision for our high schools....................................................................................................................8 Our challenge and opportunity................................................................................................................9 Theory of action ....................................................................................................................................................11 Superintendent recommendations for a stronger High School System ...........................................13 Summary of the Superintendent’s proposed plan..........................................................................................13 Measures of success ...............................................................................................................................................15 Current state of our High School System.............................................................................................17 Disparity of opportunity......................................................................................................................................18 Disparities
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 REPORT to the COMMUNITY Bodyvox, Foot Opera Files, (Photo: Michael Shea, Polara Studios): General Support Welcome
    2009 REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY BodyVox, Foot Opera Files, (Photo: Michael Shea, Polara Studios): General Support WELCOME Reflecting on this past year of financial challenges, we are struck by the resilience, creativity and determination of people in our region. Last year as we wrote this letter we faced an uncertain future and RACC vowed to do everything possible to support artists and arts organizations through this tough time. While the future remains murky, we have positive things to report from this past year – details of which run through this annual report. Thanks to enlightened and committed elected leaders, RACC held its entire grants program whole and supplemented it with Work for Art dollars, which increased by 19%. People in our region care and they give. The Transit Mall reopened with 10 previously sited artworks cleaned, conserved and re-installed in new locations. Joining them were 14 new artworks, creating a sizable public collection of Northwest sculptures. RACC was delighted to partner with TriMet throughout this four-year undertaking and will be caretakers of all the public art on the mall. Americans for the Arts recently announced that RAcc’s Public Art Program is one of the top five award-winning programs nationally, which makes us very proud. The Right Brain Initiative continues to grow. All 20 original schools returned and Portland Public Schools was able to add three new ones. We anticipate having ever-greater evidence of the value of integrated arts learning at the end of this first full year of programming. We thank all of our partners, funders and participants for this growing success.
    [Show full text]
  • Portland's High School System
    Portland’s High School System: Update on High School System Design Implementation Next Steps to Accelerate Progress December 12, 2012 PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS Carole Smith Office of the Superintendent 501 North Dixon Street • Portland, OR 97227 Superintendent (503) 916-3200 • Fax: (503) 916-3110 [email protected] December 12, 2012 To the Portland School Board: This report provides an update on the implementation of Portland Public Schools’ High School System Design (HSSD), a comprehensive reform of Portland’s high school system that was approved by the Portland School Board beginning in the fall of 2010, following an extensive two year public input process. HSSD changes were formally launched at the start the 2011-12 school year and will take full effect by the end of the 2014-15 school year. (High schools had already begun implementing a core program as early as 2010-11, and making other changes even earlier.) The high school reforms we instituted in 2010 were challenging, controversial and necessary steps. For the first time in nearly 30 years we closed a high school campus. We changed high school boundaries, modified transfer policies and overhauled programs at every high school. We made these difficult choices for one reason: our high school system was failing to serve too many students. Intolerable inequities across our high school system were a major cause of unacceptably poor results: in 2008-09, PPS had a 53 percent on-time graduation rate and a 30 percent achievement gap in graduation rates (between white and Hispanic students). The status quo was unacceptable.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2020 Edition
    Wellness Center update Page 2 BENSON TECH Perfecting educational success Page 6 Annual BPHSAA community picnic Back Cover ALUMNI TEXT The Official Newsletter of the Benson Polytechnic High School Alumni Association (BPHSAA), April 2020 Edition COVID-19 impacts on BPHSAA activities In normal times, the BPHSAA would have published a spring edition of its newsletter simultaneous with the Benson Tech Show. The 2020 coronavirus pandemic has turned this spring into a most non-normal time, with government-mandated closure of businesses and schools, and subse- quently, the attendant cancellation of Tech Show as well. That said, many things have not changed and the BPHSAA feels that keeping Benson Tech alumni and the Benson Tech community informed of relevant information is still important. While we are not printing a paper Another PPS building improvements version of this newsletter, we are making an extra effort to disseminate bond referral for Benson Tech electronic copies. By Kevin B. Clark, Ph.D. (Class of 1984) As “we go to press,” it is not known The Benson Tech community readies for another capital improvements when Oregon’s current social distanc- bond referral to be completed by Portland Public Schools (PPS) and filed ing rules will be lifted and whether with city auditor election offices for balloting and voting in November 2020. many summer events can be safely Three years ago in a spring off-cycle election, Portland voters passed a $790 held. Portland Public Schools (PPS) million bond to improve aging PPS schools prioritized for poor physical plant plans to resume school as scheduled on Sept.
    [Show full text]