Mesoamerican Voices
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Bilimek Pulque Vessel (From in His Argument for the Tentative Date of 1 Ozomatli, Seler (1902-1923:2:923) Called Atten- Nicholson and Quiñones Keber 1983:No
CHAPTER 9 The BilimekPulqueVessel:Starlore, Calendrics,andCosmologyof LatePostclassicCentralMexico The Bilimek Vessel of the Museum für Völkerkunde in Vienna is a tour de force of Aztec lapidary art (Figure 1). Carved in dark-green phyllite, the vessel is covered with complex iconographic scenes. Eduard Seler (1902, 1902-1923:2:913-952) was the first to interpret its a function and iconographic significance, noting that the imagery concerns the beverage pulque, or octli, the fermented juice of the maguey. In his pioneering analysis, Seler discussed many of the more esoteric aspects of the cult of pulque in ancient highland Mexico. In this study, I address the significance of pulque in Aztec mythology, cosmology, and calendrics and note that the Bilimek Vessel is a powerful period-ending statement pertaining to star gods of the night sky, cosmic battle, and the completion of the Aztec 52-year cycle. The Iconography of the Bilimek Vessel The most prominent element on the Bilimek Vessel is the large head projecting from the side of the vase (Figure 2a). Noting the bone jaw and fringe of malinalli grass hair, Seler (1902-1923:2:916) suggested that the head represents the day sign Malinalli, which for the b Aztec frequently appears as a skeletal head with malinalli hair (Figure 2b). However, because the head is not accompanied by the numeral coefficient required for a completetonalpohualli Figure 2. Comparison of face date, Seler rejected the Malinalli identification. Based on the appearance of the date 8 Flint on front of Bilimek Vessel with Aztec Malinalli sign: (a) face on on the vessel rim, Seler suggested that the face is the day sign Ozomatli, with an inferred Bilimek Vessel, note malinalli tonalpohualli reference to the trecena 1 Ozomatli (1902-1923:2:922-923). -
Oral Tradition 25.2
Oral Tradition, 25/2 (2010): 325-363 “Secret Language” in Oral and Graphic Form: Religious-Magic Discourse in Aztec Speeches and Manuscripts Katarzyna Mikulska Dąbrowska Introduction On the eve of the conquest, oral communication dominated Mesoamerican society, with systems similar to those defined by Walter Ong (1992 [1982]), Paul Zumthor (1983), and Albert Lord (1960 [2000]), although a written form did exist. Its limitations were partly due to the fact that it was used only by a limited group of people (Craveri 2004:29), and because the Mixtec and Nahua systems do not totally conform to a linear writing system.1 These forms of graphic communication are presented in pictographic manuscripts, commonly known as codices. The analysis of these sources represents an almost independent discipline, as they increasingly become an ever more important source for Mesoamerican history, religion, and anthropology. The methodology used to study them largely depends on how the scholar defines “writing.” Some apply the most rigid definition of a system based on the spoken language and reflecting its forms and/or structures (e.g., Coulmas 1996:xxvi), while others accept a broader definition of semasiographic systems that can transmit ideas independent of actual spoken language (yet function at the same logical level) and thus also constitute writing (e.g., Sampson 1985:26-31). The aim of this study is to analyze the linguistic “magical-religious” register of the Nahua people, designated as such because it was used for communication with the sacred realm. In this respect, it represents one of the “sacred languages,” as classified by Zumthor (1983:53). -
Codex Nicholson Pp. 59-126
Codex Nicholson 59 THE GREAT NITPICKER Davíd Carrasco I met H. B. Nicholson for the first time in 1974 at a session on Magic Books of Mexico at the 41st Internacional Congreso de Americanistas in Mexico City. He and the great Wigberto Jiménez Moreno were chairing the session, and I was thrilled to be in the audience and listen to these two wonderful scholars. Afterward I walked up and introduced myself to Professor Nicholson and told him I was planning to write a dissertation on Quetzalcoatl while completing my Ph.D. at the University of Chicago. We spoke for a few minutes as he was clearly interested in talking about Topiltzin Quetzalcoatl. He wondered if I’d read his dissertation. When I said I had come to know about it through reading Alfredo López Austin’s (1973) book, Hombre-Díos, but had not been able to obtain a copy, he promised to send me one. Soon after returning to Colorado I wrote him to thank him for our exchange and inquired about his Harvard dissertation. To my surprise and delight, a photocopy of his 1957 dissertation, Topiltzin Quetzalcoatl of Tollan: a Problem in Mesoamerican Ethnohistory, arrived at my home. As a student of religion struggling to make my way through the primary sources, a great feeling of relief came over me: I’ve just been saved! Reading through Nicholson’s dissertation focused my mind and work. The clarity, the pinpoint research, the overall organization, and the reconstruction of the “tale” all read like a tour de force legal argument making the case that the Aztecs had inherited and internalized a sacred history about the Toltec priest-king that shaped their priestly practices, religious world view and, later, their interpretation of the encounter with the Spaniards. -
Breaking the Maya Code : Michael D. Coe Interview (Night Fire Films)
BREAKING THE MAYA CODE Transcript of filmed interview Complete interview transcripts at www.nightfirefilms.org MICHAEL D. COE Interviewed April 6 and 7, 2005 at his home in New Haven, Connecticut In the 1950s archaeologist Michael Coe was one of the pioneering investigators of the Olmec Civilization. He later made major contributions to Maya epigraphy and iconography. In more recent years he has studied the Khmer civilization of Cambodia. He is the Charles J. MacCurdy Professor of Anthropology, Emeritus at Yale University, and Curator Emeritus of the Anthropology collection of Yale’s Peabody Museum of Natural History. He is the author of Breaking the Maya Code and numerous other books including The Maya Scribe and His World, The Maya and Angkor and the Khmer Civilization. In this interview he discusses: The nature of writing systems The origin of Maya writing The role of writing and scribes in Maya culture The status of Maya writing at the time of the Spanish conquest The impact for good and ill of Bishop Landa The persistence of scribal activity in the books of Chilam Balam and the Caste War Letters Early exploration in the Maya region and early publication of Maya texts The work of Constantine Rafinesque, Stephens and Catherwood, de Bourbourg, Ernst Förstemann, and Alfred Maudslay The Maya Corpus Project Cyrus Thomas Sylvanus Morley and the Carnegie Projects Eric Thompson Hermann Beyer Yuri Knorosov Tania Proskouriakoff His own early involvement with study of the Maya and the Olmec His personal relationship with Yuri -
1 Sonya Wohletz Spring 2013 Through a Glass, Darkly: a Study Of
Sonya Wohletz Spring 2013 Through a Glass, Darkly: A Study of Mirrors in Aztec Art Introduction As Hernán Cortez and his men made their way to the shores of Mexico, they may have dreamed of the vast treasures in the unknown lands to the West and the shimmering caches of gold that would soon fill their coffers, launching them to the greatest heights of Spanish society. Meanwhile, Motecuzoma II paced his palace chambers, contemplating the dark omens that announced the approach of a sinister band of invaders who would bring an end to his empire. We can imagine his worry and confusion as these strange signs visited upon him a growing kind of terror for which he could not find the language to describe. There is no way Motecuzoma could have envisioned the scale of destruction that awaited him and his people nor the profundity of the changes that the unknown invaders would bring; however, with the help of sages and diviners, Motecuzoma was already encountering clues as to the identity and nature of these unknown beings. Franciscan friar Bernardino de Sahagún, who recorded the stories and cultural customs of native informants in his cultural encyclopedia, The Florentine Codex, describes eight such clues or omens. Of these eight, perhaps the most curious is the seventh omen, in which the royal hunters discovered a bird with a mirror on its forehead: A seventh omen: at one time the fisher folk who hunted or snared with nets took captive an ashen hued bird like a crane. Then they went to show it to Moctezuma, [who was] in the Tlillan calmecatl.1 It was past noon, still daytime. -
Quetzalcoatl, the Maya Maize God, and Jesus Christ
Journal of Book of Mormon Studies Volume 11 Number 1 Article 3 7-31-2002 Quetzalcoatl, the Maya Maize God, and Jesus Christ Diane E. Wirth Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/jbms BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Wirth, Diane E. (2002) "Quetzalcoatl, the Maya Maize God, and Jesus Christ," Journal of Book of Mormon Studies: Vol. 11 : No. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/jbms/vol11/iss1/3 This Feature Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Book of Mormon Studies by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Title Quetzalcoatl, the Maya Maize God, and Jesus Christ Author(s) Diane E. Wirth Reference Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 11/1 (2002): 4–15, 107. ISSN 1065-9366 (print), 2168-3158 (online) Abstract Many scholars suggest that Quetzalcoatl of Mesoamerica (also known as the Feathered Serpent), the Maya Maize God, and Jesus Christ could all be the same being. By looking at ancient Mayan writings such as the Popol Vuh, this theory is further explored and developed. These ancient writings include several stories that coincide with the stories of Jesus Christ in the Bible, such as the creation and the resurrec- tion. The role that both Quetzalcoatl and the Maize God played in bringing maize to humankind is com- parable to Christ’s role in bringing the bread of life to humankind. Furthermore, Quetzalcoatl is said to have descended to the Underworld to perform a sacrifice strikingly similar to the atonement of Jesus Christ. -
Los Dioses Se Mudan En El Sol Y La Luna
Los dioses se mudan en el Sol y la Luna 1. Mitoa in ok youayan, in ayamo tona, in ayamo 1. Dicen que cuando aún es de noche, cuando aún tlatui, kilmach, mosentlalike, mononotske in teteo no sale el Sol, cuando no amanece, dizque se in umpa Teotiuakan, kitoke, kimoluike: juntaron en uno, se convocaron los dioses allá en Teotihuacan, dijeron, se dijeron unos a otros: —Tla xi ualuian, teteoé, ¿akin tlatkis, akin tlamamas —Venid acá, dioses, ¿quién tomará el trabajo, quién in tonas, in tlatuis? se echará a cuestas el hacer salir el sol, el hacer amanecer? 2. Au niman ye ik yeuatl unkan ontlatoa, 2. Y luego por cierto por allá habla aquel, se onmixketsa in Tekusistekatl, kito: presenta delante Tecuciztecatl, dijo: —Tetetoé, ka neuatl niyes. —¡Dioses, yo tengo que ser! 3. Okseppa kitoke in teteu: 3. Una vez más dijeron los dioses: —¿Akin okse? —¿Quién otro más? 4. Niman ye ik nepanotl mota, kimottitia, kimoluia: 4. Luego por esto juntos, se ponen a ver, se miran unos a otros, se dicen: —¿Ken onyes ji, ken tonyeske? —¿Cómo ha de ser esto? ¿Cómo seremos nosotros? 5. Ayac motlapaloya, in occe onmixquetzaz; zan 5. Nadie se atrevía para presentarse como otro más: muchi tlacatl momauhtiaya, tzinquetzaya. Auh amo sólo todas las personas tenían miedo, retrocedían. Y onnezticatca in ce tlacatl. no se estaba presentando delante de otra persona. 6. Nanahuatzin uncan tehuan tlacacticatca in 6. Nanahuatzin allí junto a ellos estaba oyendo lo nenonotzalo: niman ic yehuatl connotzque in teteo, que se determinaba: luego pues a este llamaron los quilhuique: dioses, le dijeron: —Tehuatl tiyez, Nanahuatzé. -
Interpreting Tepantitla Patio 2 Mural (Teotihuacan, Mexico)
INTERPRETING TEPANTITLA PATIO 2 MURAL (TEOTIHUACAN, MEXICO) AS AN ANCESTRAL FIGURE ____________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, Chico ____________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts In Art History ____________ by © Atalie Tate Halpin Fall 2018 INTERPRETING TEPANTITLA PATIO 2 MURAL (TEOTIHUACAN, MEXICO) AS AN ANCESTRAL FIGURE A Thesis by Atalie Tate Halpin APPROVED BY THE INTERIM DEAN OF GRADUATE STUDIES: ______________________________ Sharon Barrios, PhD. APPROVED THE GRADUATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE: ______________________________ ______________________________ Asa S. Mittman, PhD., Chair Matthew G. Looper, PhD. Graduate Coordinator ______________________________ Rachel Middleman, PhD. TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract …………………………………………………………………………………….. iv CHAPTER PAGE I. Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………… 1 II. Tepantitla Patio 2 Mural: Context and Description .......................................................... 4 III. Previous Interpretations: Literature Review …………………………………………… 14 A. “Tlaloc”……………………………………………………………………………... 14 B. “Great Goddess” …………………………………………………………………… 15 C. “Spider Woman” …………………………………………………………………… 18 D. “Water Goddess” and Other Interpretations ……………………………………….. 19 IV. Methods ………………………………………………………………………………... 24 A. Iconography ………………………………………………………………………... 24 B. Cross-cultural and Trans-historical Comparisons …………………………………. 25 V. Iconographic Analysis …………………………………………………………………… 29 A. World Trees and the Cosmic Center ………………………………………………. -
Contexts of Offerings and Ritual Maize in the Pictographic Record in Central Mexico
Contexts of offerings and ritual maize in the pictographic record in Central Mexico NATALIA MORAGAS SEGURA and ELENA MAZZETTO he objective of this article is an initial enquiry into the evidence and classification of the Tofferings of maize in Central Mexico from the Classic period to early colonial times. In order to achieve this goal, we will analyse the presence of maize in Central Mexico according to the evidence found in mural paintings and some pictographic codices. Two Mesoamerican cultures will be considered to achieve our analysis: the Teotihuacan and Mexico-Tenochtitlan. Maize was instru- mental in the performance of daily rituals and in the diet of these ancient Mesoamerican cultures and the cereal also had sacred connotations in pre-Hispanic, colonial and contemporary narratives. We suggest this by reading the iconographic and symbolic representations of corn in the form of seeds and pods, or as an ingredient in cooked foods which are represented in the mural paintings of Teotihuacan as well as some codices of the post-Classic Nahua tradition. These methodological enquiries reveal evidence of a cultural continuity in Central Mexico as a contrasting perspective on the archaeological and ethno-historical period. Introductory remarks In 1943, Paul Kirchhoff coined the term ‘Mesoamerica’ as a cultural concept to refer to the development of complex societies (Kirchhoff 1943, Flannery 1968) in the region. This concept defines a variable geographical area but also emphasizes the cultural traits that were shared by a number of different indig enous cultures. The geographical area covers Mexico to Belize, Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, and northern Costa Rica. -
42 WOLF Explaining Mesoamérica
Clásicos y Contemporáneos en Antropología, CIESAS-UAM-UIA Social Anthropology (EASA), No. 2, Vol 1, 1994, págs 1 -17. EXPLAINING MESOAMERICA Eric Wolf* Anthropology is an unusual discipline - ‘impossible’, as Aidan Southall has said, ‘but necessaryi. It’s objects of study are human beings, peculiarly polymorphous as creatures both biological and cultural; behaving so you can observe them, yet also engaged in inaudible internal discussions; transforming nature through production, while simultaneously using language and making symbols. So far no one theory has done justice to this gamut of characteristics. Any one attempt at theory has inevitably privileged some aspects over others, selecting these aspects as ‘figure’ and relegating the rest to “ground”. The followers of any one of these approaches —temporarily hegemonic— always hoped that the marginalized phenomena would someday be explained by means of the dominant paradigm. Inevitably, temporary success was followed by a return of ‘the repressed’, often accompanied by claims that the hitherto back grounded material actually contained the missing key to solve all problems. These cycles of assertion and replacement have intensified as anthropologists previously confined within particular national traditions increasingly communicate trans-nationally. There is probably no one solution to this impasse in finding an all-powerful, all- embracing theory, but several more modest alternatives suggest themselves. One is to become more eclectic, to turn into a virtue what Marvin Harris has stigmatized as a vice. We might come to admit a range of theoretical perspectives and treat them as so many 'discovery procedures’. In place of one imperial master-paradigm, we could entertain the possibility of a set of micro-paradigms, each the source of a set of methods that might teach us something new and interesting about the world. -
The Womb of the World: the Cuauhxicalli and Other
Maya ArchaeologyArticles TheWombof theWorld: TheCuauhxicalli and Other Offering Bowls of Ancient andContemporaryMesoamerica Karl Taube n ancient Mesoamerica, certain objects were used to contact is a deep, historically shared tradition that, as of yet, can be first the spirit world of gods and ancestors, including mirrors, documented for the Classic Maya. incense burners, and offering bowls. The fact that many of Ithese items were circular relates to one of their basic meanings The Aztec cuauhxicalli as cave-like passageways through which supernaturals could As noted by Nelly Gutiérrez Solana (1983:115), the term emerge. In this study, I will focus on vessels used for presenting cuauhxicalli has been used by Colonial chroniclers and modern offerings, although it should be understood that these items researchers for a variety of Aztec vessels, monuments, and were more than containers, but offered access between the world even structures. This study will refer specifically to a series of of the living and that of gods and spirits. Among the vessels to semispherical stone bowls used as receptacles for sacrificial hearts, be described are the Aztec cuauhxicalli, ritual gourd vessels of with images of the sun carved in the interior and portrayals of the contemporary Huichol and Cora, and censers of the Classic the earth deity on the base. In her detailed study of Aztec stone Maya. Aside from being vessels for sacrificial blood offerings, ritual vessels, Gutiérrez Solana (1983:83-86, Figs. 47-56) lists these items share a number of thematic meanings, including three examples, one in the Museum für Völkerkunde in Berlin the sun, the earth, and the four directions and world center. -
The Sanctuary of Night and Wind
chapter 7 The Sanctuary of Night and Wind At the end of Part 1 (Chapter 4) we concluded that Tomb 7 was a subterraneous sanctuary that belonged to a Postclassic ceremonial centre on Monte Albán and that this centre appears in Codex Tonindeye (Nuttall), p. 19ab, as a Temple of Jewels. Combining the archaeological evidence with the information from the Ñuu Dzaui pictorial manuscripts we understand that the site was of great religious importance for the dynasty of Zaachila, and particularly for Lady 4 Rabbit ‘Quetzal’, the Mixtec queen of that Zapotec kingdom. The depiction in Codex Tonindeye confirms that this sanctuary was a place for worship of sa- cred bundles but it also indicates that here the instruments for making the New Fire were kept. The Temple of Jewels, therefore, combines a religious fo- cus on the ancestors with one on the cyclical renewal of time. Continuing this line of thought, in Part 2 we explore the historical and ide- ological importance of that ritual. This has led us to discuss the meaning of several other ancient Mesoamerican artefacts, codices and monuments, such as the Roll of the New Fire (Chapter 5) and representations of rituals in Aztec art (Chapter 6). With these detailed case studies, we now confront the chal- lenge to try to say something more about the type of rituals that took place in the Temple of Jewels, so we can get an idea of the religious value of Tomb 7 and the religious experiences that ritual practice entailed. Fortunately, the representations of rituals and their associated symbolism in precolonial picto- rial manuscripts, particularly those of the Teoamoxtli Group (Borgia Group), allow us to reconstruct some of the Mesoamerican ideas and visionary experi- ences.