RESETTLEMENT DUE DILIGENCE REPORT
Resettlement Due Diligence Report for proposed Additional Road Sections (Sindh Provincial Road Improvement Project SPRIP) (September 2018)
PAK: Sindh Provincial Road Improvement Project (SPRIP)
Prepared by Project Management Unit (PMU), Works and Services Department (WSD), Government of Sindh (GOS) for the Asian Development Bank.
NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and its agencies ends on 30 June.
(ii) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars.
This Resettlement Due Diligence Report for 3 proposed additional road sections is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
Clients: Works & Services Asian Department Development Bank Government of Sindh
RESETTLEMENT DUE DILIGENCE REPORT FOR PROPOSED ADDITIONAL ROAD SECTIONS SINDH PROVINCIAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (SPRIP)
This consultant’s report does not necessarily reflect the view of ADB or the Government concernedMarch and 2018 ADB and the Government cannot be held liable for its contents.
Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
1. JAHAN KHAN (N-65) TO FAIZU LARRO (N-55) 2. SEHWAN- DADU ROAD 3. TANDO ALLAHYAR TO CHAMBAR
Resettlement Due Diligence Report March 2018
MEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 2 of 42 TABLE OF CONTENTS
SR PAGE DESCRIPTION NO NO 1 INTRODUCTION 5
Background 5
Description of Additional Project Roads 5
Scope of Proposed Works 7
2 METHODOLOGY 9
3 FINDINGS 9
Table-1: Preliminary Involuntary Resettlement Impact Assessment 10
Impact on Indigenous People 12
4 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS 12
Type of Participants (Stakeholders) 13
5 GRIEVANCE REDRESS PROCESS 16
6 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS 16
7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 17
8 MONITORING PLAN 17
Issues 18
Monitoring Plan (Table 3) 19
Annexure-A (Resettlement Screening Checklist) 21
Annexure-B (Indigenous Persons Screening Checklist) 25
Annexure-C (Pictorial Presentation) 31
Annexure-D (Letters for ROW) 35
Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
‹ ADB Asian Development Bank ‹ SPRIP Sindh Provincial Road Improvement Project ‹ FGD focus group discussions ‹ WSD Works and Services Department ‹ GOS Government of Sindh ‹ IR involuntary resettlement ‹ LAR land acquisition and resettlement plan ‹ GRC grievances redress committee ‹ APs affected persons ‹ IP indigenous people ‹ MPR monthly progress report ‹ NGO non-governmental organization ‹ PIU project implementation unit ‹ ROW right of way ‹ RD reduced distance ‹ SPS Safeguard Policy Statement ‹ ToR terms of reference ‹ UTM Universal Transverse Mercator ‹ RP resettlement plan ‹ VOC vehicle operating cost ‹ SC supervision consultants ‹ DP displaced persons ‹ L/S left side
Page 4 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 4 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
1. INTRODUCTION
Background
1. The Government of Sindh (GOS), with assistance from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) is rehabilitating the existing provincial highway network in Sindh to develop an affordable, safe, and sustainable transport system. The Government has its highest priorities which aim to improve the quality of transportation by upgrading the highways network. This will increase the economic well-being of local population and alleviate the poverty.
2. The Project involves the rehabilitation of six major provincial roads in Sindh covering 328 km of the provincial highway network. These six roads include: (i) Thull to Kandhkot, (ii)Sheranpur to Ratodero, (iii) Khyber to Sanghar, (iv)Sanghar to Mirpurkhas, (v) Tando Muhammad Khan to Badin, and (vi) Digri to Noukot. Rehabilitation works were limited to the existing right of way (ROW), which is 110 feet wide. The Executive Engineers of Provincial Highways WSD have confirmed (See Annexure–D). Adjustments in the design were made to avoid impacting encroaching structures in the ROW as provided in the approved Due Diligence Report prepared in May 2017 and are monitored by the Resettlement Specialist hired under the Project Management Consultants (PMC) for the project. Implementation of civil works in these 6 road packages is ongoing and is expected to be completed before December 2018.
3. The Project proposes to utilize project savings to rehabilitate three additional provincial road sections: (i) road from Jahan Khan to Faizu Larro via Chak town, (28 km connecting N-65 with N-55); (ii) road from Sehwan to Dadu (32 km); and (iii) road from Tando Allahyar to Chambar (22 km). Provincial Highways Divisions of Works and Services Department (WSD), Government of Sindh owns the ROW and no land acquisition is needed for these three additional subprojects.
4. This Resettlement Due Diligence Report (DDR) is prepared to assess if the proposed works in these additional roads will have involuntary resettlement (IR) risks that need to be addressed either through design adjustments, or compensated if cannot be avoided, following the ADB Safeguards Policy Statement (2009) and the loan covenants of the Project.
Description of Additional Project Roads
Road from Jahan Khan ToFaizuLarro via ChakTown(28.4 km)
5. This road alignment is an existing very important artery which connects N- 65(Sukkur to Quetta Highway) with N-55 (Larkana to Kashmore Highway) via Chak Town, it will also provide a more direct connection between N-53 and N-65 for local traffic. The approximate distance of National Highway from Jahan Khan to Faizu Larro on N-65 and N-55 is 38 km. The subproject road measures 28.4 km between two towns, thus, saving approximately 10 km. This subproject of 28.4 km has already available ROW of 110 ft owned by Provincial Highways Division of Works and Services Department. It is 28.4 km and has already available 110 ft ROW owned by the Provincial Highways Division of Works and Services Department GOS. The project road is off taking from Sukkur to Quetta Highway from Jahan Khan Bazaar located about 7 km from Sukkur city and passes through Bhirkan goth village at chainage KM 06+00,Khai Stop at chainage KM 07+300 and Chak Town at chainage KM 10+00 and town of Rustam at chainage KM 21+900. The
Page 5 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 5 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018 end-point is fixed at 1 km before N-55 junction point which is known at Faizu Larro. That 1 kilometer is under construction by the Provincial Highways Division of Works and Services Department GOS. The existing road width is already 7.3 meters with earthen shoulders varying from 1.0m to 3.0m. Present condition of road is having rough and deteriorating surface throughout its length. Potholes and bumps cause serious problems for commuters. Riding quality of road is very poor. Due to deplorable and fragile state of road pavement it is necessary to save this road asset from further deteriorating and crumbling. Rehabilitation/improvement of the road would save this road asset and improve traffic flow between two main national highways from origin to destination, saving time and cost of the commuters. Moreover, that would be an important section of national highways network.
Road from Sehwan To Dadu (32 km)
6. This road alignment had been an important and shortest possible road connecting Dadu town and Sehwan Sharif via Talti. It off takes from Indus Highway N-55 at about 4 km from Sehwan Sharif and passing through villages of goth Ali Khanan at ChainageKM04+200, Wada Manhayoon village at chainage KM 16+200 and Khushk Morr. The existing width of road is 3.65m having already available ROW of 110 ft owned by Provincial Highways Division of Works and Services Department GOS. The existing earthen shoulder width varies from 1.75 to 4.0m. Road surface condition is continuously deteriorating and needs immediate rehabilitation and widening to facilitate comfortable driving conditions and to avoid accidents particularly in villages and bazars located on the project road.
Road from Tando Allahyar To Chamber (19.0 km)
7. The project road connects two Taluka Headquarters i.e. Taluka Tando Allahyar and Taluka Chambar. This project road is 19 km long and has an existing 110 ft. ROW already owned by Provincial Highways Division of Works and Services Department GOS. Project road starts from Ishaq Town more of Ibrahim colony and passes through Haji Juma Madonibazarat chainage KM 7+00, Fazal stop at chainage KM 10+500, Jarakmorr stop at chainage KM 12+400, goth Khan Muhammad Bozdar at Chainage KM 13+200, Shish Mahal goth at chainage KM 14+500, Karachi stop atchainage KM 18+200 and ends at start of Chamber Town. Due to narrow lane width traffic gets congested. As a result, travel time and vehicle operating cost is increased. Moreover, the accident rate is also getting higher. The proposed width is taken at 7.3 m for main carriageway with varying shoulders between 1.0 to 2.0 m. Subproject road has very poor road surface conditions having 5.5m existing carriageway with earthen shoulders varying from 1.5 to 4.0 m causing congested road traffic conditions and frequent accidents.
Page 6 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 6 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
Scope of Proposed Works
Rehabilitation and Improvement of Jahan Khan (N-65) ToFaizu Larro (N-55) Road
8. The scope of work consists of rehabilitation/improvement of existing road condition of already existing alignment of road and rehabilitation of bridges. The works include an overlay over main carriageway of 7.3m and 2.0m shoulders on either side with a total width of 11.3m, except in certain sections where shoulder width is adjusted based on actual available space. It includes the rehabilitation of bridge over Sindh canal at chainage KM 23+760 wherein deck slab is to be re-laid.
Rehabilitation and Improvement of Road from Sehwan To Dadu
9. The scope of work consists of widening of main carriageway from 3.65 m to 7.3 m with up to 1.5 m paved shoulders on either side. In town/village areas the shoulder width will be reduced to make it compatible with the available width. The subproject will also improve/rehabilitate bridges and culverts, i/c widening of bridge at MNV drain at chainage KM 06+200.
Rehabilitation and Improvement of Road from Tando Allahyar To Chambar
10. The scope of work consists of widening of main carriageway from 5.5 m to 7.3 m with 1.5 meters (average) paved shoulders on either side and improvement of structures. The shoulder width would be reduced compatible with the available width to avoid any resettlement impact.
Page 7 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 7 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
Page 8 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 8 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
2. METHODOLOGY
11. A team consisting of following professionals conducted field visits from 5th March to 7th March 2018 all three additional sub project roads.
i. Saeed uz Zafar Resettlement Specialist, PMC ii. Qurban Ali Mangi Resident Engineer-II, PMC iii. Ghulam Akbar Memon Resident Engineer-I, PMC iv. Israr Ali Surveyor, PMC v. Shahnawaz Magsi Surveyor, PMC
12. During the field surveys, interviews were conducted with shopkeepers, local people and notables of the area and they were fully informed regarding proposed roads rehabilitation and widening works and closely consulted on social and likely resettlement impacts of the proposed subprojects in compliance of ADB Safeguard Policy 2009. Their views regarding the proposed widening and improvement of the roads were also recorded.
3. FINDINGS
Involuntary Resettlement Impact Assessment
13. On Jahan Khan To Faizu Larro sub project, available road width was measured which is found sufficient for the main carriageway i.e 7.3 meters.
14. On Dadu Sehwan subproject, available road width was measured which is found sufficient for the main carriageway i.e 7.3 meters particularly in local bazaar areas. While at other bazaar areas more than 7.3 meters was available. However, At Wada Manhayoon town chainage 16+873 and chainage 17+00 only 7.0 m width is available. Therefore, the width of carriageway is reduced to 5.5m to avoid any IR impacts. At chainage 18+50 available carriageway width is just 6.0 m where a bridge and a shrine is located. The widening of bridge to be made on left side of the existing bridge where a katcha storage room (6 x 6 ft) near shrine needs to be relocated. A resettlement plan is to be prepared.
15. On Tando Allahyar To Chamber subproject, available road width was measured which is found 11.30 meter throughout the road section with an exception of 10.5 m at village Fazul Mandri chainage 10+500 where a mosque is located at the edge of road. Damage to the mosque will be avoided by reducing shoulders by about 0.40 m on both sides. Resettlement screening checklists were prepared and shown in Annexure-A for three additional roads respectively.
16. The three additional sub projects roads generally have sufficient available ROW (110 ft) for the proposed civil works, the Executive Engineers of Provincial Highways Works and Services Department have confirmed (See Annexure-D). The construction limit for embankment on either side comprises maximum of 7.3 m (24 ft) carriageway with 2.0 m (6.5 ft.) shoulders on either side total 11.3 m (37 ft.) to avoid the resettlement
Page 9 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 9 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
impact. However, there are 19 road sections where the proposed works may potentially impact on encroaching structures at the following road sections.
a. Jahan Khan to Faizu Larro b. Sehwan to Dadu c. Tando Allahyar to Chamber
17. The observations and preliminary impact assessment findings for Additional sub project Roads are summarized below in Table-1.
Table-1: Preliminary Involuntary Resettlement Impact Assessment Available Location/ Identified clear Sr.# Chainage Potential Proposed Design Solution to avoid LAR impact width KM LAR issues (Meter) 1. Jahan Khan (N-65) To Faizu Larro (N-55) Road Section (28.4 km) The impact would be avoided to confine the section width designed at 7.3 m 1.1 0+000 6 shops 10.3 main carriageway and 1.5 m shoulders on either side, adjusted with available width instead of taking full ROW. The impact would be avoided to confine the section width compatible with the 1.2 6+000 2 shops 10.5 available width instead of taking full ROW. The impact would be avoided to confine the section width compatible with the 1.3 7+300 4 shops 10.7 available width instead of taking full ROW. The impact would be avoided to confine the section width compatible with the 1.4 10+500 6 shops 9.1 available width instead of taking full ROW. No land acquisition would be required as the diversion could be provided within ROW of irrigation department and of highway department crossing each 1.5 23+760 bridge 7.3 other(Figure 02).
2. Sehwan To Dadu (32 km) Goth Ali Khanan the shoulder width is reduced to about 0.5 m either side to 2.1 4+200 4 houses 8.5 avoid damages to houses. Improvement of bridge at MNV drain would be within ROW of road and Irrigation Channel. No land acquisition would be required as the diversion could 2.2 6+200 bridge 8.00 be provided within ROW of irrigation department and of highway department crossing each other. LAR impacts are completely avoided. The width of carriageway is reduced to 5.5m to avoid any IR impacts and avoid 2.3 9+700 mosque 8.00 damages to the mosque (Figure 03) At Sultan Ahmed Burriro Goth. Town, width of carriageway is reduced to 5.5m 2.4 10+600 3 houses 7.4 to avoid damages to residential structures (Figure 04) Improvement/rehabilitation of bridge would be within ROW of road and 2.5 14+100 bridge 8.00 irrigation channel. The impact would be avoided to confine the section width compatible with the 2.6 16+440 2 shops 9.3 available width instead of taking full ROW. At Wada Manhayoon town, the width of carriageway is reduced to 5.5m to 2.7 16+873 House 7.0 avoid any IR impacts. At Wada Manhayoon town, the width of carriageway is reduced to 5.5m to 2.8 16+920 House 7.5 avoid any IR impacts. Animal At Wada Manhayoon town, the width of carriageway is reduced to 5.5m to 2.9 16+940 8.3 Fodder Shed avoid any IR impacts.
At Wada Manhayoon town, the width of carriageway is reduced to 5.5m to avoid 2.10 16+980 House 8.5 any IR impacts.
Page 10 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 10 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
Available Location/ Identified clear Sr.# Chainage Potential Proposed Design Solution to avoid LAR impact width KM LAR issues (Meter) At Wada Manhayoon town, the width of carriageway is reduced to 5.5m to avoid 2.11 16+990 House 7.6 any IR impacts. At Wada Manhayoon town, the width of carriageway is reduced to 5.5m to avoid 2.12 17+000 House 7.0 any IR impacts.
The widening of bridge to be made on L/S of the existing bridge where a katcha 2.13 18+500 Bridge 6.0 storage room(6x6 ft) near shrine needs to be relocated. For that purpose a resettlement plan is to be prepared.
3. Tando Allahyar To Chamber (19 km)
Fazul Mandri a mosque is located at the edge of road. During construction any 3.1 10+500 mosque 10.5 damage to the mosque should be avoided by reducing shoulders by about0.40m on both sides . Refer Figure: 05.
Page 11 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 11 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
Fig-01: Chak Town at Chainage KM Fig-02: Bridge at Chainage KM 10+000 Jahan Khan – Chak (N-65)- 23+760 on Jahan Khan – Chak (N-
Fig-03: Mosque located at Fig- 4: Houses at Chainage KM Chainage KM 9+700 on Sehwan 10+600 on Sehwan Dadu Road
Fig- 5: Mosque located at Chainage KM 10+500 on Tando Allahyar to Chamber Road
Page 12 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 12 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
Impact on Indigenous People
Ethnicity
18. The main castes located in the project area are Shahani, Mir, Syed, Bhanbro, Arain, Odd, Khaskheli, Mallah, Soomro, Rajput, Jutt,Mahar and Aradain. None of these castes fall in category of IP.
Settlement Pattern
19. A general overview during the field visit, it was observed that about 75% houses are kacha houses15% are semi–pacca houses and 10% houses are pacca houses in the three additional subproject area. The survey has revealed a high level of social integration among the people.
Languages
20. The predominant first language is Sindhi, Saraiki, Punjabi and Urdu languages are spoken and understood as local languages Indigenous peoples check lists were prepared for the 3 proposed road subprojects. The screening confirmed that there are no indigenous peoples’ communities or settlements in the subproject areas. Hence, no impact on IPs may be expected. The completed indigenous peoples checklist is presented as Annexure-B
4. STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS
21. Consultations were made with local community for the three additional sub- project roads during the month of March 2018. The stakeholders were informed on likely impacts of resettlement issues as per ADB SPS 2009. A meaningful consultation of stakeholders has been conducted for all subprojects to reach the objectives of ADB resettlement policy. This consultation is carried out during the planning and design phase. Similarly, consultations would be carried out during the implementation phase, as well.
Objective
22. Consultations were made with the stakeholders and general public by the survey team. Consultative meeting was held to learn about the views and concerns of the public on the proposed development works. In order to enhance the Project acceptability for the general public on social considerations. The main objectives of the consultation were to: • Introduce the project • Share fully the information with the stakeholders about the Improvement and widening of three additional subproject roads and the expected impact on the socioeconomic environment of the project corridor. • Improve project design to avoid social and resettlement issues in compliance of ADB Safeguard policy 2009.
Page 13 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 13 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
• Understand stakeholder concerns regarding various aspects of the project, including the existing condition of the road, upgrade requirements, and the likely impact of construction–related activities and operation of the improved road. • Ensure transparency in all activities related to social mitigation and resettlement matters. • Receive feedback from stakeholders on their concerns regarding the project’s input and mitigation measures suggested by them. • Gather information regarding stakeholders' views about the project;
Type of Participants (Stakeholders)
23. Stakeholders who were consulted include shopkeepers, and notables of the areas such as members of trade union, businessmen, medical doctors, gov’t. Employees and road users such as truck and wagon drivers.
24. Consultation sessions were made with local community in the three additional sub projects in March, 2018. A list of consultations and participants is given in Tables-2a, 2b and 2c for the three roads. In addition to these, official consultations were held with WSD officials to make the plan better and organized.
Table-2a: Consultations with Local People & Notables of Jahan Khan (N-65) to Faizu Larro (N-55) via Chak Road Subproject
Serial Date Location/ Contact Name of Main Results of Consultations NO. Venue Details Participants
1. 5-March, 2018 Jahan Khan 03083027170 V Hakim Khan The business of the people should not be affected due to project 5-March, 2018 Jahan Khan 03167203616 V Allah Dino activities. 2. Local skilled and unskilled labor should be employed in the project 3. 5-March, 2018 Jahan Khan 03042640198 V Muhammad Usman works. 4. 5-March, 2018 Jahan Khan 03056358480 V Mehran Construction work should be completed well in time 5. 5-March, 2018 Jahan Khan 03173011996 V Muhammad Ramzan 6. 5-March, 2018 Jahan Khan V Naseer 7. 5-March, 2018 Jahan Khan V Ali Nawaz
8. 5-March, 2018 Chak 03053559058 V HussainBux safe and free mobility of locals especially women and children as 9. 5-March, 2018 Chak 03053034295 V Muhammad Arab well as safety measures to be taken 10. 5-March, 2018 Chak 03053894879 V Haji Qasim during construction activities. Proper arrangements should be made for smooth and un– interrupted flow of traffic passing through the road during the construction of the project works. 11. 5-March, 2018 Chak V Sher Muhammad Tree plantation along the road should be made through local communities.
Page 14 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 14 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
Serial Date Location/ Contact Name of Main Results of Consultations NO. Venue Details Participants
12. 5-March, 2018 Chak V Gopal Das Avoid relocating / dismantling V Rahim mosques and other permanent V Muhammad Bajul structures V Poraha V Khair Muhammad V Ali Ahmad V Aslam khan 13. 5-March, 2018 FaizuLarro V Sulaiman Protection walls should be constructed where needed. 14. 5-March, 2018 FaizuLarro V Mehar Provide drainage on both sides of the bypass 15. 5-March, 2018 FaizuLarro V Muhammad Rahim
16. 5-March, 2018 FaizuLarro V Riasat 17. 5-March, 2018 FaizuLarro V Nizam Din
18. 5-March, 2018 FaizuLarro V FarzandBrohi
Table-2b: Consultations with Local People &Notables of Sehwan Dadu Sub project
Serial NO. Date Location/ Contact Name of Main Views /Concerns Venue Details Participants 19. 4-March, 2018 Ali Khanan 03469024548 V Ali Murad Views of the participants were positive. They were 4-March, 2018 Ali Khanan 03338320858 V Muhammad willing for the road 20. Idrees improvement. 21. 4-March, 2018 Ali Khanan 03015756231 V Muhammad Mithal 22. 4-March, 2018 Ali Khanan 03136666337 V Javed Ahmad
23. 4-March, 2018 Ali Khanan 03229118556 V Waheed Murad
24. 4-March, 2018 Ali Khanana 03068325812 V Mushtaq Ahmad
25. 4-March, 2018 Ali Khanana V Rab Nawaz
26. 4-March, 2018 WadyonManayo 03459655761 V Qaiser The respondents were of the view that they need to be given proper identification 4-March, 2018 WadyonManayo 03459655761 V Allah Warayo of ROWs so as they can be
27. able to take their property 28. 4-March, 2018 WadyonManayo 03078460816 V Abdul Karim accordingly 29. 4-March, 2018 WadyonManayo 03136454531 V Liaqat Ali The respondents offered full 30. 4-March, 2018 WadyonManayo 03145957100 V Ali Bux assistance and cooperation 03459201483 V Abdul Waheed for rehabilitation & 03459655761 Brohi improvement of road, 03078460816 V GhulamRasool culverts and bridges. 03136454531 V Muhammad 03145957100 Sadique 03459201483 V Abdul Jabbar V Sherbaz V Waris khan 31. 4-March, 2018 Vehar Sharif V Sultan Shah The respondents mentioned that they are happy with the 32. 4-March, 2018 Vehar Sharif V Kashmir Bhayo proposed project. They mentioned that they are
Page 15 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 15 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
Serial NO. Date Location/ Contact Name of Main Views /Concerns Venue Details Participants 33. 4-March, 2018 Vehar Sharif V Mubarak facing severe problems of load shedding & gas. Above 34. 4-March, 2018 Vehar Sharif V Sher Muhammad all they mentioned that they 35. 4-March, 2018 Vehar Sharif V Haji Kamal Din need government schools for primary level. 36. 4-March, 2018 Vehar Sharif V Rehmat Ali
Table 2c: Consultations with Local People &Notables of Tando Allahyar to Chamber Subproject
Serial NO. Date Location/ Venue Contact Name of Main Views /Concerns Details Participants 37. 7-March, 2018 Karachi Hotel Stop 03065977430 V Dr.SianBux Avoid hiring outside labor 38. 7-March, 2018 Karachi Hotel Stop 03018168857 V Ashok Kumar that is likely to restrict local 39. 7-March, 2018 Karachi Hotel Stop 03016668857 V WaqarHussain women’s mobility and create social unease. 40. 7-March, 2018 Karachi Hotel Stop 03007376337 V GhulamRasool Local skilled and unskilled labor should be employed in 41. 7-March, 2018 Karachi Hotel Stop 03339118432 V Jan Muhammad the project works. Construction work should be 42. 7-March, 2018 Karachi Hotel Stop 03018765581 V Saleh Ahmad completed well in time 43. 7-March, 2018 Karachi Hotel Stop 0345-7925761 V GhulamNabi 44. 7-March, 2018 Yar Ki Mori 0345-9633361 V Irfan Ahmad Ensure that contractors do not use private land for parking construction 7-March, 2018 Yar Ki Mori 0345-9655799 V Ghulam Abbas machinery without
45. settlement with the owner 46. 7-March, 2018 Yar Ki Mori 03443094862 V Muhammad particularly in agricultural Usman areas as agricultural lands are already in short. 47. 7-March, 2018 Yar Ki Mori 03453888988 V Javed Ali Contractor should hire tractor trolleys from the 48. 7-March, 2018 Yar Ki Mori 03003282528 V Bashir V Khadam local people for construction 03453662129 V Muhammad purposes. Hanif V Ashok V Pervaiz Muhammad V Mahmood V Azam 49. 7-March, 2018 Murghachodgari 03462192755 V Sultan The respondents offered full assistance and cooperation
50. 7-March, 2018 03004418642 V Abdul Amin for rehabilitation & improvement of road. 51. 7-March, 2018 Murghachodgari 03332885467 V Muhammad Omer 52. 7-March, 2018 Murghachodgari V Mohan 53. 7-March, 2018 Murghachodgari 03466219275 V GhulamQadir 54. 7-March, 2018 Murghachodgari 03453662129 V Wali Erect cautionary and Muhammad information signs. Strictly enforce speed control
25. On Sehwan-Dadu subproject at chainage RD 18+50 a katcha storage room (6x6ft) needs to be relocated as detailed in paragraph 13 and Table-1. For that purpose a resettlement plan is to be prepared. Owner of the katcha room Ghulam Rasool s/o Faiz Mohammad is likely tobe affected due to relocation of his katcha room. A consultation meeting was held with him. He showed positive response and said he has no objection for relocating his structure provided he should be given proper compensation. Further,
Page 16 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 16 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018 he offered full assistance and cooperation for rehabilitation and improvement of the road as this will result in reducing traffic accidents and provide easy and speedy movement to Sehwan Shareef Dargha and Dadu city.
Future Consultation and Participation
26. The effectiveness of the consultation and participation program is directly related to the degree of continuing involvement of local communities in project during planning and implementation phases. Several additional consultations with communities will form part of the further stages of project planning and implementation. Resettlement Specialist accompanied by PMU & supervision consultant staff will hold meetings with the local communities. These meetings will help in discussing the issues and also increasing coordination of local peoples with PMU and consultant staff. The outcome of these consultations will be resulted in reducing potential damage to the properties of the of community reduce traffic accident possibilities.
5. GRIEVANCE REDRESS PROCESS
27. A grievance redress mechanism is already working under Deputy Director (Safeguards Quality Control), PMU for social monitoring of existing 6 roads for this purpose a Resettlement specialist has been hired through PMC. A similar grievance redress mechanism will be designed for these proposed additional roads in full compliance with ADB policy.
6. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
28. A Safeguard Unit has been notified as per the ADB Guidelines is constituted. SU is responsible for ensuring compliance to ADB Safeguards requirement during the implementation of the project, including the 3 additional subprojects. The unit shall oversee planning and implementation the safeguards management for both IR and environment safeguards and shall ensure the requisite deliverables including but not limited to due diligence reports, final LARP &SSEMPs and periodic monitoring reports are submitted to ADB in a timely manner. The SU is composed of following PMU and PMC staff members:-
♦ Deputy Director (Safeguards Quality Control), PMU, (Chairman) ♦ Assistant Engineer, SPRIP (Upper-Division SPRIP) (Member of the Committee) ♦ Assistant Engineer (Lower Division SPRIP) (Member of the Committee) ♦ Resettlement Specialist, PMC (Member of the Committee) ♦ Environmental Specialist, PMC (Member of the Committee)
Page 17 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 17 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
29. This due diligence report encompasses and evaluates all the three subprojects for having IR impacts. It has been found that there are 19 road sections where proposed works may potentially impact on encroaching structures, which are given in Table-1. These resettlement impacts are avoided by squeezing the X-sectional width of the road compactable with the available width. On Sehwan-Dadu subproject at Wada Manhayoon town, the width of carriageway is reduced to 5.5m to avoid any IR impacts. At chainage 18+50 on Sehwan-Dadu subproject, available carriageway width is just 6.0 m where a bridge and a shrine is located, The widening of bridge to be made on left side of the existing bridge where a katcha storage room(6x6ft) near shrine needs to be relocated. For that purpose, a resettlement plan is to be prepared.
30. Design adjustments have been made in the detailed design to avoid/reduce the impacts. One unavoidable impact noted (i.e. 1 katcha storage room) will be compensated. In case resettlement impacts come noticed during construction of road these will be avoided or mitigated through preparation of a resettlement plan (RP).
31. In addition, the following recommendations are made to avoid potential RP impacts and ensure awareness on and use of grievance redress mechanism for the population of Project area: ♦ PMU, PMC with support from Construction Supervision Consultant should monitor temporary land use and ensure that in case temporary use during construction activities is requiredthe Construction Contractor obtains relevant agreements allowing use of such lands. Moreover, after completion of civil works the lands taken for temporary use shall be restored to their original conditions by Construction Contractor(s) and rent fees shall be fully paid to the owners of those land;
♦ PMU in cooperation with PMC should monitor grievance redress process, ensure continuous liaison with Grievance Focal Points as well as PMU, and regularly inform ADB on actions taken on received complaints, their status and constraints in resolving those complaints if any;
8. MONITORING PLAN
32. The monitoring plan and its institutional requirements have been included in Table-3. The table identifies the effects of the construction of different project components on various social parameters. It also spells out mitigation/enhancement actions. The table also defines the responsibilities of various actors, viz. Proponent, Contractor and the Engineer in the implementation and monitoring of the mitigation actions.
Objectives of Monitoring Plan
33. This plan will help PMU to address the accidental impact of the project, enhance project benefits. The primary objectives of the plan are to:
i. Define the responsibilities of project proponents, contractors and other role players, and effectively communicate social issues among them.
ii. Facilitate the implementation of the mitigation measures by providing the details of each project accidental/ unforeseen impacts.
Page 18 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 18 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
iii. Define a monitoring mechanism and identify monitoring parameters to ensure that all mitigation measures are completely and effectively implemented.
34. Issues to be included in the monitoring include:
i. Acquisition of land due to accidental damages for project structures.
ii. Accidental damages of shop, residential houses and religious or community structures.
35. Since excavation for project structures, construction of culverts and embankment will result in generation of excavated spoil, disposal of which will be a matter of great concern.
i. Regulating the procurement of borrow material, soil erosion during construction.
ii. Ensuring safety of construction crew and local communities during construction
Page 19 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 19 of 42 Monitoring Plan (Table 3) Responsibilities
Stage of Resources Description Receptors Mitigation Accidental project Implementation Supervision Impacts
Social 1. Impacts on During – *Effect on general Local people *The Contractor will ensure that the mobility of the Contractor PMU/SC Impact general Construction mobility. local communities, particularly women and mobility of children and their livestock is not hindered by the Locals *Accessibility of the local construction activities. population to the access road.
During – *Community will have to Local The contractor will ensure the effective Contractor PMU/SC Construction face the noise and dust Communities construction controls by the Contractor to avoid hazards. inconvenience to the locals due to noise, smoke and fugitive dust. The contractor will frequently sprinkle water at the work areas and haul tracks to avoid generation of fugitive dust. The frequency of sprinkling of water will be determined by the weather condition. During long spell of hot and dry weather the sprinkling will be done after 2 or 3 hour intervals.
During – The presence of outside All social The Contractor will be required to maintain close Contractor PMU/SC Construction construction workers Components liaison with the local communities to ensure that inevitably causes some any potential conflicts related to common resource degree of social utilization for the project purposes are resolved disruption. quickly.
2. Safety Construction Occurrence of Construction Complying with the safety precautions for Contractor PMU/SC Hazards accidents/incidents Crew construction workers as per International Labor during the construction Organization (ILO) Convention No. 62, as far as activities. applicable to the project contract.
Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
Responsibilities
Stage of Resources Description Receptors Mitigation Accidental project Implementation Supervision Impacts
3. Private Construction If the construction work The Contractor will rebuilding the damaged Contractor PMU/SC Houses or accidentally structures Shops damaged/affected Local People private structures (houses) need to be compensation
4 .Religious, Construction If accidentally damage Local People The Contractor will rebuilding the damaged Contractor PMU/SC Cultural and any community / structures Historical religious (Masjids) Sites structures/historical or archeological due to construction work.
Page 21 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 21 of 42
ANNEXURE A
RESETTLEMENT SCREENING CHECKLIST
Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
9. RESETTLEMENT SCREENING CHECKLIST JAHAN KHAN (N-65) TO FAIZULARRO (N-55) VIA CHAKROAD SUBPROJECT
Not If yes, consider potential scope of Potential for Involuntary Resettlement Effects* Yes No Known resettlement effects
However, no private land acquisition is Will the subproject include any new physical O required. All works will be done within construction work? the existing ROW.
Does the subproject include widening of highway O
Are any environmental effects likely which may lead to loss of housing, other assets, resource use or O incomes?
Is land acquisition likely to be necessary? O Involves WSD Land (ROW)
Is the site for land acquisition known? NA
Land belongs to WSD Is the ownership status and current usage of the land NA known?
Are non-titled people present on the site/within the O corridor of Impact?
Will there be loss of housing? O
Impact on structures as mentioned in Table-1 can be avoided through Will there be loss of crops, trees, and other fixed adjustment in construction O assets through land use related changes? works.Without these adjustments, there will be impacts on some encroaching structures.
Will there be loss of incomes and livelihoods? O
Will people lose access to facilities, services, or natural subproject will facilitate smooth flow of O resources through land use-related changes? traffic through urban area
Will any social or economic activities be affected O through land use-related changes?
Affected persons and severity of impacts
Any estimate of the likely number of those affected by the project? No () Yes () Not Applicable
If yes, approximately how many? No land owners will be affected
Any estimate of the severity of impact at the household level? None
If yes, what?
Any of these people poor, indigenous, or vulnerable to poverty risks? No ( O ) Yes ( )
If yes, how?
Page 23 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 23 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
Date: MARCH 2018
RESETTLEMENT SCREENING CHECK LIST FOR SEHWAN-DADU ROAD SUBPROJECT
Not If yes, consider potential scope of Potential for Involuntary Resettlement Effects* Yes No Known resettlement effects
Will the subproject include any new physical However, no private Land acquisition is O construction work? required.
Does the subproject include widening of highway O .
A graveyard and other structures as mentioned in Table-1 located at Are any environmental effects likely which may lead chainage 11+00.Therefore, existing O to loss of housing, other assets, resource use or alignment of the road may be incomes? rehabilitatd to avoid any resettlement issue at this site.
Is land acquisition likely to be necessary? O Involves WSD Land (ROW)
Is the site for land acquisition known? NA
Land belongs to WSD Is the ownership status and current usage of the land NA known?
Are non-titled people present on the site/within the O corridor of Impact?
Will there be loss of housing? O
There are potential impacts on some encroaching structures which can be Will there be loss of crops, trees, and other fixed O avoided through design changes. Except assets through land use related changes? a katcha room 6*6 needs to be shifted as mentioned in Table-1 .
Will there be loss of incomes and livelihoods? O
Will people lose access to facilities, services, or natural Project will facilitate smooth flow of O resources through land use-related changes? traffic through urban area
Will any social or economic activities be affected O through land use-related changes?
Affected Persons and Severity of Impacts
Any estimate of the likely number of those affected by the project? No () Yes () Not Applicable
If yes, approximately how many? No land owners will be affected
Any estimate of the severity of impact at the household level? None
Page 24 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 24 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
If yes, what?
Any of these people poor, indigenous, or vulnerable to poverty risks? No ( O ) Yes ( )
If yes, how?
Date: MARCH 2018
Page 25 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 25 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
RESETTLEMENT SCREENING CHECK LIST TANDOALLAHYAR-CHAMBAR ROAD SUBPROJECT
If yes, consider potential Potential for Involuntary Resettlement Not Yes scope of resettlement Effects* Known No effects
Will the subproject include any new physical However, no private land O construction work? acquisition is required.
Does the subproject include widening of O highway
Are any environmental effects likely which may lead to loss of housing, other assets, O resource use or incomes?
Is land acquisition likely to be necessary? O Involves WSD Land (ROW)
Is the site for land acquisition known? NA
Is the ownership status and current usage of NA Land belongs to WSD the land known?
Are non-titled people present on the O site/within the corridor of Impact?
Will there be loss of housing? O
There is no resettlement impact Will there be loss of crops, trees, and other with exception of a mosque which fixed assets through land use related O will likely to be affected without changes? design change.
Will there be loss of incomes and O livelihoods?
Will people lose access to facilities, services, Project will facilitate smooth flow or natural resources through land use- O of traffic through urban area related changes?
Will any social or economic activities be O affected through land use-related changes?
Affected Persons and Severity of Impacts Any estimate of the likely number of those affected by the project? No ( ) Yes ( ) Not Applicable If yes, approximately how many? No land owners will be affected Any estimate of the severity of impact at the household level? None If yes, what? Any of these people poor, indigenous, or vulnerable to poverty risks? No ( O ) Yes ( ) If yes, how?
Page 26 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 26 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
Date: MARCH 2018
ANNEXURE B
INDIGENOUS PERSONS SCREENING CHECKLIST
Page 27 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 27 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
INDIGENOUS PEOPLES SCREENING CHECKLIST JAHAN KHAN (N-65) TO FAIZULARRO (N-55) VIA CHAKROAD SUBPROJECT
NOT KEY CONCERN YES NO REMARKS KNOWN
(Please provide elaborations on the Remarks column)
A. Screening for presence/absence of Indigenous Peoples
1. Are there socio-cultural groups present in or use the project area who may be considered as "tribes" (hill tribes, schedules tribes, O … tribal peoples), minorities (ethnic or national minorities), or indigenous communities in the project area?
2. Are there national or local laws or policies as well as anthropological researches/studies that consider these groups present in or using the project area as belonging to "ethnic O
minorities", scheduled tribes, tribal peoples, national minorities, or cultural communities?
3. Do such groups self-identify as being part of a distinct social and O cultural group?
4. Do such groups maintain collective attachments to distinct habitats or ancestral territories and/or to the natural resources O
in these habitats and territories?
5. Do such groups maintain cultural, economic, social, and political O institutions distinct from the dominant society and culture?
6. Do such groups speak a distinct language or dialect? O
7. Has such groups been historically, socially and economically marginalized, disempowered, excluded, and/or discriminated O
against?
8. Are such groups represented as "Indigenous Peoples" or as "ethnic minorities" or "scheduled tribes" or "tribal populations" O in any formal decision- making bodies at the national or local levels?
Overall assessment: IP present in project area
B. Identification of Potential Impacts
9. Will the project directly or indirectly benefit or target Indigenous O Peoples?
10. Will the project directly or indirectly affect Indigenous Peoples' traditional socio-cultural and belief practices? (e.g. child-rearing, O
health, education, arts, and governance)
11. Will the project affect the livelihood systems of Indigenous Peoples? (e.g., food production system, natural resource O
management, crafts and trade, employment status)
Page 28 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 28 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
12. Will the project be in an area (land or territory) occupied, owned, or used by Indigenous Peoples, and/or claimed as ancestral O
domain?
Assessment of Impact Categorization
(Please provide elaborations on the Remarks column)
C. Identification of Special Requirements will the project activities include:
13. Commercial development of the cultural resources and O knowledge of Indigenous Peoples?
14. Physical displacement from traditional or customary lands? O
15. Commercial development of natural resources (such as minerals, hydrocarbons, forests, water, hunting or fishing grounds) within customary lands under use that would impact the livelihoods or O
the cultural, ceremonial, spiritual uses that define the identity and community of Indigenous Peoples?
16. Establishing legal recognition of rights to lands and territories that are traditionally owned or customarily used, occupied or O
claimed by indigenous peoples?
17. Acquisition of lands that are traditionally owned or customarily O used occupied or claimed by indigenous peoples?
Is Broad Community Consent Required O
Date: MARCH 2018
Page 29 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 29 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
INDIGENOUS PEOPLESSCREENING CHECKLIST OF SEHWAN-DADU ROAD SUBPROJECT
NOT KEY CONCERN YES NO REMARKS KNOWN
(Please provide elaborations on the Remarks column)
A. Screening for presence/absence of Indigenous Peoples
18. Are there socio-cultural groups present in or use the project area who may be considered as "tribes" (hill tribes, schedules tribes, O … tribal peoples), minorities (ethnic or national minorities), or indigenous communities in the project area?
19. Are there national or local laws or policies as well as anthropological researches/studies that consider these groups present in or using the project area as belonging to "ethnic O
minorities", scheduled tribes, tribal peoples, national minorities, or cultural communities?
20. Do such groups self-identify as being part of a distinct social and O cultural group?
21. Do such groups maintain collective attachments to distinct habitats or ancestral territories and/or to the natural resources O
in these habitats and territories?
22. Do such groups maintain cultural, economic, social, and political O institutions distinct from the dominant society and culture?
23. Do such groups speak a distinct language or dialect? O
24. Has such groups been historically, socially and economically marginalized, disempowered, excluded, and/or discriminated O
against?
25. Are such groups represented as "Indigenous Peoples" or as "ethnic minorities" or "scheduled tribes" or "tribal populations" O in any formal decision- making bodies at the national or local levels?
Overall assessment: IP present in project area
B. Identification of Potential Impacts
26. Will the project directly or indirectly benefit or target Indigenous O Peoples?
27. Will the project directly or indirectly affect Indigenous Peoples' traditional socio-cultural and belief practices? (e.g. child-rearing, O
health, education, arts, and governance)
28. Will the project affect the livelihood systems of Indigenous Peoples? (e.g., food production system, natural resource O
management, crafts and trade, employment status)
Page 30 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 30 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
29. Will the project be in an area (land or territory) occupied, owned, or used by Indigenous Peoples, and/or claimed as ancestral O
domain?
Assessment of Impact Categorization (Please provide elaborations on the Remarks column) C. Identification of Special Requirements will the project activities include: 30. Commercial development of the cultural resources and O knowledge of Indigenous Peoples?
31. Physical displacement from traditional or customary lands? O
32. Commercial development of natural resources (such as minerals, hydrocarbons, forests, water, hunting or fishing grounds) within customary lands under use that would impact the livelihoods or O
the cultural, ceremonial, spiritual uses that define the identity and community of Indigenous Peoples?
33. Establishing legal recognition of rights to lands and territories that are traditionally owned or customarily used, occupied or O
claimed by indigenous peoples?
34. Acquisition of lands that are traditionally owned or customarily O used occupied or claimed by indigenous peoples?
Is Broad Community Consent Required O
Date: MARCH 2018
Page 31 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 31 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
INDIGENOUS PERSONS SCREENING CHECKLIST OF TANDO ALLAHYAR-CHAMBAR ROAD SUBPROJECT
NOT KEY CONCERN YES NO REMARKS KNOWN
(Please provide elaborations on the Remarks column)
A. Screening for presence/absence of Indigenous Peoples
35. Are there socio-cultural groups present in or use the project area who may be considered as "tribes" (hill tribes, schedules tribes, O … tribal peoples), minorities (ethnic or national minorities), or indigenous communities in the project area?
36. Are there national or local laws or policies as well as anthropological researches/studies that consider these groups present in or using the project area as belonging to "ethnic O
minorities", scheduled tribes, tribal peoples, national minorities, or cultural communities?
37. Do such groups self-identify as being part of a distinct social and O cultural group?
38. Do such groups maintain collective attachments to distinct habitats or ancestral territories and/or to the natural resources O
in these habitats and territories?
39. Do such groups maintain cultural, economic, social, and political O institutions distinct from the dominant society and culture?
40. Do such groups speak a distinct language or dialect? O
41. Has such groups been historically, socially and economically marginalized, disempowered, excluded, and/or discriminated O
against?
42. Are such groups represented as "Indigenous Peoples" or as "ethnic minorities" or "scheduled tribes" or "tribal populations" O in any formal decision- making bodies at the national or local levels?
Overall assessment: IP present in project area
B. Identification of Potential Impacts
43. Will the project directly or indirectly benefit or target Indigenous O Peoples?
44. Will the project directly or indirectly affect Indigenous Peoples' traditional socio-cultural and belief practices? (e.g. child-rearing, O
health, education, arts, and governance)
Page 32 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 32 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
45. Will the project affect the livelihood systems of Indigenous Peoples? (e.g., food production system, natural resource O
management, crafts and trade, employment status)
46. Will the project be in an area (land or territory) occupied, owned, or used by Indigenous Peoples, and/or claimed as ancestral O
domain?
Assessment of Impact Categorization
(Please provide elaborations on the Remarks column)
C. Identification of Special Requirements will the project activities include:
47. Commercial development of the cultural resources and O knowledge of Indigenous Peoples?
48. Physical displacement from traditional or customary lands? O
49. Commercial development of natural resources (such as minerals, hydrocarbons, forests, water, hunting or fishing grounds) within customary lands under use that would impact the livelihoods or O
the cultural, ceremonial, spiritual uses that define the identity and community of Indigenous Peoples?
50. Establishing legal recognition of rights to lands and territories that are traditionally owned or customarily used, occupied or O
claimed by indigenous peoples?
51. Acquisition of lands that are traditionally owned or customarily O used occupied or claimed by indigenous peoples?
Is Broad Community Consent Required O
Date: MARCH 2018
Page 33 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 33 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
ANNEXURE C
Pictorial Presentation
Page 34 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 34 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
PICTORAL PRESENTATION OF PROJECT DISCLOSURE BY RESETTLEMENT SPECIALIST AND STAKEHOLDRES VEIWS REGARDING PROPOSED THREE ADDITIONAL SUB- PROJECTS ROADS
JAHAN KHAN (N-65) TO FAIZULARRO (N-55) VIA CHAK
Consultation with notables at Jahan Khan (N-65) to Consultation with Community people at Chak (N- Faizu Larro (N-55) via Chak Road Subproject 65)To Faizu Larro (N-55) via Chak Road Subproject
Consultation with Shop Keepers at Rastum (N-65) to Faizu Larro (N-55) via Chak Road Subproject
Page 35 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 35 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
SEHWAN-DADU ROAD
Consultation with local people at Ali Khanan on Sehwan – Dadu Subproject
Consultation with Notables at Wadyon Manayoon Sehwan – Dadu Subproject
Subproject
Page 36 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 36 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
TANDOALLAHYARTO CHAMBAR ROAD
Consultation with local people at Karachi Stop on Tando Allahyar to Chamber Subproject
Consultation with local people at Yarki Mori on Tando Allahyar to Chamber Subproject
Page 37 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 37 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
ANNEXURE D
Letters for ROW
Page 38 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 38 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
Page 39 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 39 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
Page 40 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 40 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
Page 41 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 41 of 42 Resettlement Due Diligence Report for Additional Road Sections March 2018
Page 42 of 42
SMEC International Pty Ltd, 4th Floor, ICCI Building, Mauve Area G-8/1, Islamabad Page 42 of 42