Since World War Two, One of the Most Significant

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Since World War Two, One of the Most Significant Since World War Two, one of the most significant challenges Nazi Germany's head of the Luftwaffe, Hermann Goring, wanted the Ho-229 to for military aviation has been the task of defeating radar be able to penetrate enemy territory to a depth of 1,000km (621 miles). WORDS BY ROB COPPINGER The Ho-229 had a fatal test-flight crash before the end of the war, but a production order for 40 was still made. ADAR PROVED ITS could see the Bf 109's deficiencies, and However, it never actually went into effectiveness 80 years ago began to think about an aircraft that production and, when the United States' in the Battle of Britain, could defeat the RAF's Hawker Hurricane Third Army overran Friedrichsroda, when the new long-range and Supermarine Spitfire. Germany, in April 1945, its soldiers found detection technology The design that emerged from Horten's the Ho-229 prototypes, three through six. allowed the Royal Air subsequent contemplation, with the Above: The Convair The Horten brothers had built and Ki ngfish was Force to know where, when and how help of his brother, Rei mar, was the des igned with various flown delta-shaped flying wings since the to counter the waves of Nazi fighters Horten Ho-229, a single pilot, twin-jet, stea lth features. It 1930s, but they w ere not the only ones and bombers attacking the country. delta wing-shaped fighter bomber. With com peted for the US to have such an interest. Jack Northrop, govern ment's high­ One of the Messerschmitt Bf 109 pilots its two Junkers Jumo 004 8-2 turbojets, speed reconnaissance who would build the company that bore assaulting the UK was Walter Horten the Ho-229 was estimated to be able to aircraft contract, that his name, had also been working on them of the Luftwaffe's fighter squadron achieve a top speed of 527 knots (977kph). would eventually be during the same decade, and had first won by the Lockheed 26, stationed in occupied France. The According to the National Air and Space SR-71 Blackbird flown his flying wing Northrop Model 1 squadron's technical officer, Horten, Museum of the Smithsonian Institution, Alexander Fedosenko Mockup (N-1M ), on July 3, 1940. December 2020 // www.Key.Aero Seven years later, Northrop was ready to Northrop and the Horten brothers were test fly its own jet-powered flying wing, developing their flying-wing designs. but a far larger one than the N-1Mor the A number of nations were working on Ho-229. The Northrop YB-49 had a 52.4m radar at the time: the UK, Germany, (172ft) span, compared to the N-1 M's Netherlands, USA, France, Japan and 11 .6m or the Ho-229's 16.8m. However, Russia, then the Soviet Union. The US, UK like the Ho-229, the second prototype and Germany were advanced enough that crashed, coming down on June 5, 1948. by the mid-1930s they had functioning The flying wing bomber would not radar systems able to detect aircraft supersede the tried-and-tested tube­ more than 10 miles away. In 1936, the UK and-wing design and not until the 1980s achieved a 75-mile detection range. In would the US Air Force see its like again. 1938, an American radar on board a naval It was in the 1980s that Reimar Horten vessel detected an aircraft 100 miles away. made the claim that the Ho-229 had been Radar had arrived. designed with stealth in mind. Articles According to the Smithsonian, Rei mar by the Smithsonian explain that Rei mar first wrote about aircraft radar cross Horten made this assertion in 1983 - the section (RCS) in an article about flying same year the Lockheed Martin F-117 wings, which was published in the Nighthawk secretly entered service - in May 1950 issue of Argentina's National his book, Flying Wings: the History ofthe Magazine of Aeronautics. The RCS is a Horten Aircraft. According to Horten, he measurement of the strength of the had considered placing layers of charcoal returned signal from the aircraft painted within the wood construction of the by the radar beam. Ho-229, which he claimed would have According to Russell Lee, the absorbed the radar-signal energy. Smithsonian's aeronautics department Ideas about defeating radar are much supervisory curator for all-wing aircraft, older than the detection technology Reimar and Northrop had corresponded itself. Writing for the United States' after the war. Jack Northrop however Centennial of Flight Commission website, had no interest in collaborating with the historian Dwayne Day pointed out:"ln German engineer and former Nazi party the 19th century, Scottish physicist James member, who had migrated to Argentina Clerk Maxwell developed a series of after the war. If he had chosen to join mathematical formulas to predict how forces, Lee pointed out that Northrop electromagnetic radiation would scatter could have benefited, as the available data when reflected from a specific geometric shows that the Horten wing was stable. shape;' adding that Maxwell's equations The YB-49's stability was not as good, were later refined by the German scientist, hence the crash that was fatal for the pilot Arnold Johannes Sommerfeld. and for the type. Radar would arrive many decades after While history remembers the Horten Maxwell; in fact it became a reality while brothers for their engineering genius, www.Key.Aero II December 2020 December 2020 // www.Key.Aero not everything Rei mar claimed was true. Investigations into the Ho-229 by the Smithsonian staff and Northrop Grumman found that there was no clear evidence of stealth capabilities. There was also no confirmation of charcoal, and an investigation by a Northrop Grumman­ funded documentary production company discovered the Ho-229 could not have evaded the Allied forces' radars of that era. The radar signature test of a full-size Ho-229 model conducted by Northrop Grumman engineers did conclude that there was some reduction in the RCS compared to a normal fighter, but the notion that the Horten brothers had designed it w ith stealth in mind was found to be unconvincing. While Rei mar's boasts are apparently false, the flying w ing shape has since been closely associated with stealth. Despite Maxwell's 19th-century equations, deflecting or absorbing radar waves was not the immediate solution to counter the detection technology that defense scientists opted for. Jamming was their first idea, and, in May 1938, a British Saunders Roe A.27 London twin-engine Below: This rear view of the Horten Ho 229 biplane flying boat jammed radar. V3 shows its Nazi Knowing this was possible, the British then emblems of the installed anti-jamming technology across 1940s Luftwaffe Smithsonian Air and their radar network. Jamming is still a part Space Museum/Ben of the electronic-warfare portfolio, but Sullivan 2013 active sensors give away a transmitter's Right: The Teledyne location; being invisible to radar was Ryan AQM-91A ultimately the better option. Compass Arrow In the US, w hile the Ho-229 became a drone at the Nationa l Museum of the United World War Two curiosity, slow ly rotting States Air Force away in storage, Northrop's flying wing USAF test flights and the ideas of RCS signal w ith turbojet s, the Kingfish used ramjet reduct ion were not forgotten. engines to reach Mach 4 at 90,000ft and Towards the end of the 1950s and had stealth aspects to it. the beginning of the 1960s, the US The Kingfish's stealth feat ures included government was interested in high- a delta flying wing shape, exhaust speed reconnaissance aircraft. The shoot­ shielding and a more angular fuselage down by Russia of Francis Gary Powers for radar signal scattering, but its design and his Lockheed U-2 Dragon Lady in lost out to t he Blackbird, because ramjet 1960 made higher speed an imperative. engine technology was not developed Various designs competed, but they enough. While a t urbojet uses a series of would eventually lose out to the Lockheed rotating blades to increasingly compress SR-71 Blackbird. One of t hem was the the air before combustion, the ramjet Convair Ki ngfish. While t he Blackbird consists of a complex tube whose shape was designed for achieving Mach 3 does the same job compressing t hat www.Key.Aero II December 2020 , December 2020 // www.Key.Aero ...... ~--,... www.Key.Aero II December 2020 incoming air- but the rate of the airflow is significantly higher. Later in the 1960s, one attempt at stealthier aircraft was not even piloted - the Teledyne-Ryan AQM-91 A Arrow Compass drone. Air-launched, its vertical surfaces were canted inward to thwart radar reflections, and it used radar-absorbing materials. The Arrow Compass was ready to be deployed in 1971, but it was not deemed necessary. In the 1970s, the US Department of Defense's (DoD) Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) studied adversaries' new surface-to-air missile (SAM) systems, concluding that US aircraft were vulnerable to detection and attack by SAMs. The loss of Francis Gary Powers' U-2 a decade earlier had been clear evidence that Russian SAM systems were a threat. According to the United States Air Force Museum, by the 1970s new materials and techniques allowed engineers to design an aircraft with stealth qualities. DARPA embarked on a program to develop strategies and technologies for reducing radar detectability. These included reducing the radar cross­ section with a combination of aircraft shaping to minimize the number of radar return spikes and the use of radar absorbent materials.
Recommended publications
  • Daniel Egger Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c87w6jb1 Online items available Daniel Egger papers Finding aid prepared and updated by Gina C Giang. Manuscripts Department The Huntington Library 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2191 Fax: (626) 449-5720 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org © Finding aid last updated June 2019. The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. Daniel Egger papers mssEgger 1 Descriptive Summary Title: Daniel Egger papers Inclusive Dates: 1927-2019 Collection Number: mssEgger Collector: Egger, Daniel Frederic Extent: 3 boxes, 1 oversize folder, 1 flash drive, and 1 tube (1.04 linear feet) Repository: The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens Manuscripts Department 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2191 Fax: (626) 449-5720 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org Abstract: The Daniel Egger papers include correspondence, printed matter, and photographs related to Daniel Egger’s career in the aerospace industry. Language of Material: The records are in English and Spanish. Access Collection is open to qualified researchers by prior application through the Reader Services Department. For more information, please go to following web site . NOT AVAILABLE: The collection contains one flash drive, which is unavailable until reformatted. Please contact Reader Services for more information. RESTRICTED: Tube 1 (previously housed in Box 1, folder 1). Due to size of original, original will be available only with curatorial permission. Publication Rights The Huntington Library does not require that researchers request permission to quote from or publish images of this material, nor does it charge fees for such activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the PDF File
    Nick: Invisibility sounds like something out of a work of Sci-Fi. However, Northrop Grumman’s B2 Spirit is just that. While the B2 is not invisible to the naked eye, it can avoid detection by radar thanks to a specially designed frame and coating that deflects and nullifies radar waves. Radar waves are sent outwards, and bounce off of features such as engines and straight wings. By altering its shape and applying radar absorbent material, the B2 is able to minimize the radar waves that can be analyzed, making the B2 almost impossible to find. On top of being a stealth plane, the B2 is a flying wing, meaning it has no fuselage or tail. The B2 is meant to be a low observable stealth plane used to penetrate anti-aircraft defenses. It can carry both conventional and thermonuclear weapons, and is a unique aircraft that can carry heavy air-to-surface weapons while also remaining in stealth. But where did this technology come from? Daryl: As soon as radar was developed during World War Two, there was a need to evade radar. Efforts were made during and after the war to counter radar, and two German brothers were the first to find a solution. Walter and Reimar Horton were pilots with the German Luftwaffe, but also designed aircraft of their own. One of these was the Horton HO-229 jet, the earliest flying wing propelled by a jet, which also had radar wave absorbing material on the wings. They used a wood-carbon powder to absorb radar waves, making this the earliest stealth plane.
    [Show full text]
  • “Keep the Dream Alive”
    February 28, 2015 The 60th Annual Honors and Awards Banquet “Keep the Dream Alive” February 28, 2015 th 60 Honors & Awards Banquet Diamond Anniversary 1 The 60th Annual Honors and Awards Banquet February 28, 2015 National Engineers Week Committees ~ BANQUET COMMITTEE ~ Kenneth Davis, Sonja Domazet, Stephen Guine, William Johnson, Sharlene Katz, Paul Landry, Robert Tarn, Thomas R. Tarn, Charles Volk ~ HONORS & AWARDS COMMITTEE ~ Marek Barylak, Kenneth Davis, Stephen Guine, Sharlene Katz, Paul Landry, Charles Olsefsky, R. Freeman Straub, Robert B. Tarn ~ AWARDS ASSEMBLY ~ Ken Davis, Sonja Domazet, James Flynn, Bill Johnson, Sharlene Katz, Charles Olsefsky ~ HOST / HOSTESSES ~ Olivia Landry, Maria Tarn ~ SOUVENIR PROGRAM GRAPHICS & DESIGN ~ Paul Landry ~ AWARD GRAPHICS ~ Mike Matte ~ AUDIO / VIDEO ~ Swank Audio Visuals, Carlos Guerra ~ BANQUET SETUP / AWARDS DISTRIBUTION ~ Marissa Bayless, Margo Guerra ~ MATH COUNTS ~ Jerry Kraim, Eli Stiny Engineers’ Council Past Presidents 1970 William B. Johnson 1992 Robert Budica 2005 Robert B. Tarn 1980 Clifford B. Shiepe, PE 1993 Lloyd W. Higginbotham, FIAE 2006 Paul F. Landry 1981 Clifford B. Shiepe, PE 1994 Lloyd W. Higginbotham, FIAE 2007 Paul F. Landry 1982 Lloyd W. Higginbotham, FIAE 1995 Lloyd W. Higginbotham, FIAE 2008 Patrick Berbon 1983 William F. Hassel, PE, FIAE 1996 Lloyd W. Higginbotham, FIAE 2009 Dr. Charles H. Volk 1984 Clifford Terry 1997 Lloyd W. Higginbotham, FIAE 2010 Dr. Charles H. Volk 1985 Roland V. Roggero 1998 Lloyd W. Higginbotham, FIAE 2011 Kenneth G. Davis 1986 James P. Ritchey 1999 Lloyd W. Higginbotham, FIAE 2012 Kenneth G. Davis 1987 James P. Ritchey 2000 Lloyd W. Higginbotham, FIAE 2013 Sonja Domazet 1988 Harlan L. Russ 2001 Lloyd W.
    [Show full text]
  • Sherman Oaks, California
    Sherman Oaks, California Theodore von Kármán Engineer of the Year Educator of the Year Achievement Award Mr. Eric D. Knutson Dr. Melvin A. Breuer Dr. Buzz Aldrin Director of Advanced Projects Professor Astronaut, Apollo XI Lockheed Martin Skunkworks University of Southern Retired Colonel, USAF Palmdale, California California Author and Space Los Angeles, California Advocate th 56 Annual HONORS AND AWARDS BANQUET Saturday, February 26, 2011 In Celebration of National Engineers Week, February 20-26, 2011 National Engineers Week Committees Banquet Committee: Marek Barylak, Robert Budica, Larry Dalton, Kenneth Davis, Sonja Domazet, Carlos & Margo Guerra, Stephen Guine, William Johnson, Jerry Kraim, Diane Kulisek, Paul Landry, Charles Olsefsky, S. K. Ramesh, Rick Ratcliffe, Ramin Roosta, Noelle Segura, R. Freeman Straub, Robert Tarn, Charles Volk Honors & Awards Committee: Kenneth Davis, Diane Kulisek, Paul Landry, Charles Olsefsky, R. Freeman Straub, Robert Tarn Visual Media Services: Warren Huskey, Mike Matte Awards Assembly Marek Barylak, Larry Dalton, Kenneth Davis, Sonja Domazet, William Johnson, Diane Kulisek, Sharlene Katz, Charles Olsefsky, Ramin Roosta, R. Freeman Straub, Charles Volk Hostesses: Mary Claire Jensen, Mickey Knobloch, Olivia Landry, Maria Tarn Audio/Video: Swank Audio Visuals Award Presenters: Sonja Domazet, Stephen Guine, William Johnson, Paul Landry, Robert Tarn, Charles Volk Banquet Setup/Awards Distribution: Margo Guerra, CSUN Engineering Students Math Counts: Jerry Kraim LA County Science Bowl: Larry Dalton First Robotics: R. Freeman Straub The Engineers’ Council Board of Directors President Vice President Treasurer Secretary Kenneth G. Davis Sonja Domazet Dr. Charles H. Volk Robert B. Tarn Trustees: Dr. Robert J. Budica, Paul F. Landry, Dr. A. F. Ratcliffe, Robert B.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Flight Dynamics Model of a Flying Wing Configuration
    Master thesis in Aeronautical Engineering Development of a Flight Dynamics Model of a Flying Wing Configuration Candidate Supervisor Jacopo Tonti Prof. Guido De Matteis External supervisor Prof. Arthur Rizzi (Kungliga Tekniska högskolan) Academic Year 2013/2014 cbn 2014 by Jacopo Tonti Some rights reserved. This thesis is available under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-3.0 IT License. (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/it/) Alla mia musa , a Vale «As ailerons, these damn spoilers make great rudders!» Bruce Miller, after flying the Marske Pioneer 1A Abstract The subject of UCAV design is an important topic nowadays and many countries have their own programmes. An international group, under the initiative of the NATO RTO AVT-201 Task group, titled “Extended Assessment of Reliable Stability & Control Pre- diction Methods for NATO Air Vehicles”, is currently performing intensive analysis on a generic UCAV configuration, named SACCON. In this thesis the stability and control characteristics of the SACCON are investigated, with the purpose of carrying out a compre- hensive assessment of the flying qualities of the design. The study included the generation of the complete aerodynamic database of the aircraft, on the basis of the experimental data measured during TN2514 and TN2540 campaigns at DNW-NWB low speed wind tunnel. Moreover, system identification techniques were adopted for the extraction of dynamic derivatives from the time histories of forced oscillation runs. The trim of the aircraft was evaluated across the points of a reasonable test envelope, so as to define a set of plausible operative conditions, representing the reference conditions for subsequent linearization of the dynamic model.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look Back at Flying Wings Part 1
    NORTHROP FLYING WING S - P A R T 1 AVION MODEL 1, N - 1 M & N - 9M EDITED BY:TONY R. LANDIS WRITER/ARCHIVIST, HQ AFMC HISTORY OFFICE DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE NORTHROP FLYING WING S - P A R T 1 Northrop’s latest aircraft, the B-21A Raider is the culmination of John K. Northrop’s dream of all wing design whose evolution stretches back to 1929. This is the first in a series of articles that will take a look back to the early days of aviation to show the birth of John Northrop’s dream. The Avion (Northrop) Model 1, commonly known as the 1929 Flying Wing, was the first rudimentary attempt at an all-wing vehicle, though it retained a simple boom- mounted tail assembly for added stability. Breaking away from the standard protocol of using wood for the structural assembly, Northrop chose 24S Alclad aluminum for the Model-1. Powered by a 90 HP 4 cylinder, inline, inverted Cirrus engine center- mounted inside the fuselage in a pusher (rear mounted) arrangement, the Avion Model 1 made its first flight at Mines Field, California on July 30, 1929 when test pilot Eddie Bellande performed two short hops during high speed taxi runs. Shortly there- after the aircraft was trucked to Muroc Dry Lake in California’s Mojave Desert. The vast expanse of the dry lake gave the small test team plenty of room to test their new design. The first ‘official’ flight of the Model-1 came on September 26th at Muroc. Bel- lande performed two brief flights totaling 5 minutes on the 26th and three days later made its final Muroc flight during a 5 minute test hop around the lakebed before operations moved to United Air Terminal in Burbank where flight operations continued on November 18th.
    [Show full text]
  • The Death of Jack Northrop's Flying Wing Bombers
    Clipped Wings: The DeathLESSONS of Jack LEARNEDNorthrop’s Flying Wing Bombers CLIPPED WINGS: THE DEATH OF JACK NORTHROP’S FLYING WING BOMBERS Dr. Bud Baker One of the mysteries in defense acquisition has concerned the fate of the Northrop Flying Wing bombers, canceled by the Air Force more than 50 years ago. Aviation experts have long suspected that the 1949 cancellations were motivated more by politics than by the Wings’ technical shortcomings. However, public records, declassified Air Force documents, and personal interviews — never before published — reveals that the cancellation of the Flying Wings was a sound decision, based on budgetary, technical, and strategic realities; and the issues addressed here are as pertinent to defense acquisition today as they were 50 years ago. Like today, decision makers struggled to balance cost, schedule, and technical performance. They also had to deal with shrinking defense budgets, a declining defense industrial base, and a world situation in which the only constant was change. Nearly all the interviewees for this research — including Secretary (and Senator) Symington, Generals LeMay, Norstad, and Quesada — are gone now, but their recollections here serve to make clear what really happened to the predecessors of today’s B-2 bomber. The lessons of the Flying Wings remain pertinent today. ore than 50 years ago, a series of their own technical shortcomings? Or of remarkable aircraft took to were they pawns in a high-stakes politi- M the skies of America. These cal power play, as Jack Northrop con- huge all-wing bombers were the product tended? This article will answer those of the genius John Knudsen Northrop, and questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Survey Conducted at Northrop Grumman Corporation, El
    REPORT OF SURVEY CONDUCTED AT NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION EL SEGUNDO, CA FEBRUARY 1998 Best Manufacturing Practices BEST MANUFACTURING PRACTICES CENTER OF EXCELLENCE College Park, Maryland www.bmpcoe.org F o r e w o r d This report was produced by the Best Manufacturing Practices (BMP) program, a unique industry and government cooperative technology transfer effort that improves the competitiveness of America's industrial base both here and abroad. Our main goal at BMP is to increase the quality, reliability, and maintainability of goods produced by American firms. The primary objective toward this goal is simple: to identify best practices, document them, and then encourage industry and government to share information about them. The BMP program set out in 1985 to help businesses by identifying, researching, and promoting exceptional manufacturing practices, methods, and procedures in design, test, production, facilities, logistics, and management – all areas which are highlighted in the Department of Defense's 4245.7-M, Transition from Development to Production manual. By fostering the sharing of information across industry lines, BMP has become a resource in helping companies identify their weak areas and examine how other companies have improved similar situations. This sharing of ideas allows companies to learn from others’ attempts and to avoid costly and time-consuming duplication. BMP identifies and documents best practices by conducting in-depth, voluntary surveys such as this one at the Northrop Grumman Corporation, El Segundo, California conducted during the week of February 23, 1998. Teams of BMP experts work hand-in-hand on-site with the company to examine existing practices, uncover best practices, and identify areas for even better practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Oddities
    AIAA AEROSPACE M ICRO-LESSON Easily digestible Aerospace Principles revealed for K-12 Students and Educators. These lessons will be sent on a bi-weekly basis and allow grade-level focused learning. - AIAA STEM K-12 Committee. AVIATION ODDITIES Most of us have a clear idea of what an airplane looks like; the word conjures up images of airliners and fighter jets, or perhaps old-fashioned biplanes and general aviation stalwarts like Cessna Skyhawks and Piper Cherokees. These planes all share generally similar layouts: long, relatively slender fuselages, wings mounted on the left and right sides, and stabilizers (vertical and horizontal fins) mounted at the tail. This has been the “standard” configuration for aircraft for over a hundred years (probably dating back to Glenn Curtiss’ “Headless Pusher,” one of the first aircraft to go into production), but over the years there have been a dizzying variety of different configurations for airplanes, ranging from the unexpected to the downright bizarre. Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS): * Discipline: Engineering, technology, and applications of science. * Crosscutting Concept: Structure and function. * Science & Engineering Practice: Constructing explanations and designing solutions. GRADES K-2 NGSS: Engineering Design: Ask questions, make observations, and gather information about a situation people want to change to define a simple problem that can be solved through the development of a new or improved object or tool. What does an airplane need in order to fly? First, it needs enough lift to counteract its weight and keep it in the air. Then it needs some means to keep its front end pointing forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Jack Northrop and the Flying Wing
    n the 1940s, Jack Northrop gen- aircraft with a wingspan of 172 feet, erated great excitement with his pushed along by four sets of contra- amazing “Flying Wing,” which rotating propellers mounted on the flew like an airplane but didn’t trailing edge. The YB-49, a jet-powered the instability problems and the flying look like one, at least not in version of the XB-35, came in 1947. wing offered an advantage that had Ithe traditional sense. It demonstrated Seen head-on, the Flying Wing become of critical importance: It was that an aircraft did not need a tail or a looked like a flying saucer and was extremely difficult for radar to detect. fuselage to fly. The wing was enough. sometimes mistaken for one in UFO In fact, Northrop’s first true flying sighting reports. Public fascination was ELIMINATING THE TAIL wing, the small-scale N-1M, took off nurtured by its regular appearance in Interest in a flying wing dates from the on its own during a high-speed taxi newsreels and photo spreads in popular early days of aviation. It was understood test on a dry lake bed in the California magazines. that a fuselage and a tail provided stabil- desert in July 1940. It hit a rough spot, However, the Flying Wing had seri- ity and control for an airplane—but that bounced 10 feet into the air, and flew ous technical and operational problems. they also created drag, which reduced several hundred feet before the pilot The contra-rotating propellers never aerodynamic efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • Jack Northrop This Year's Choice Visitor Center
    THE P. O. Box 1903, Kitty Hawk, NCFlyer 27949 Fall 2002 www.firstflight.org • Ph. 252-441-1903 Jack Northrop this year’s choice By Tom Halfhill The First Flight Society’s Shrine Committee didn’t have too much difficulty in choosing this year’s person to be enshrined into our Paul E. Garber “Hall of Fame”. As most of you know, the Society chooses persons that have made signifi- cant contributions to aviation that fit our yearly theme for our annual December 17 celebration. This year’s theme is aeronautical engineers and designers and while we had an impressive list of names to choose from, we settled on John Knudsen Northrop. Jack, as he was known, was born at Newark, New Jersey on November 10, 1895. Many men have contributed to the progress of the modern airplane through the years shaping its performance and safety but Mr. Northrop’s name always stands out. Jack Northrop grew up in Santa Barbara, California near businesses involved in building aircraft. He was dedicated to the aeronautical sciences and in his early twenties, he started as a draftsman for the Loughead brothers who were designing a flying boat in 1916. Helping in the designing and gaining valuable knowledge, after World War I he co-invented the revolution- ary monocoque fuselage-forming process. Lockheed, like many others of the time, had dif- John Knudsen Jack Northrop will be honored this December 17th by the First Flight Society. ficulty selling airplanes and soon closed their doors. Northrop then joined the Douglas During the next two years, he designs two more Gamma.
    [Show full text]
  • B-2: the Spirit of Innovation
    B - 2: The Spirit of Innovation B-2: The Spirit of Innovation Rebecca Grant Rebecca Grant Air Force No Objection, 88ABW-2013-2250, 9 May 2013; NGAS 13-0405 B-2: The Spirit of Innovation Rebecca Grant i B-2: The Spirit of Innovation Table of Contents Foreword ......................................................................................................... pg. v Chapter One: Cones, Drones, and Low Observables ... pg. 1 Chapter Two: Two Horses in the Race ..................................... pg. 7 Chapter Three: Cruise Missiles and Tacit Blue ............... pg. 15 Chapter Four: A Bomber? ................................................................ pg. 23 Chapter Five: Another Horse Race ........................................... pg. 33 Chapter Six: Risk Closure ................................................................. pg. 43 Chapter Seven: “My Airplane Blew Up On Me”............ pg. 55 Chapter Eight: A Miracle a Day .................................................. pg. 63 Chapter Nine: Slip and Recovery .............................................. pg. 73 Chapter Ten: Success ............................................................................ pg. 83 Endnotes ......................................................................................................... pg. 93 III iv FOREWORD ook skyward, and wonder. Wilbur and Orville Wright wondered if they could fathom the secrets of birds Lin flight. Every aerospace pioneer since – and every individual who has helped them – channels that very human curiosity
    [Show full text]