DOCSLIB.ORG

No Slide Title

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
No Slide Title FFCCSS PPrrooggrraamm OOvveerrvviieeww 99tthh AAnnnnuuaall AArrmmyy SSmmaallll BBuussiinneessss CCoonnffeerreennccee JJoohhnn KKeelllleeyy DDiirreeccttoorr -- SSuupppplliieerr MMaannaaggeemmeenntt && PPrrooccuurreemmeenntt FFuuttuurree CCoommbbaatt SSyysstteemmss 12/20/2005 10:53:20 AM Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited, TACOM 28 Oct 2005, case 05-270 1 FCS System-of-Systems Manned Systems Unmanned Air Vehicles Command and Class II Class III Class IV Infantry Carrier Control Vehicle Class I Vehicle Unattended Munitions Unattended NLOS LS Ground Intelligent Sensors Munitions System Mounted Combat System Recon and Surveillance Vehicle Unmanned Ground Vehicles ARV RSTA ARV Aslltt Non-Line of Sight Cannon Non-Line of Sight Mortar Small (Manpackable) UGV Armed Robotic Vehicle MULE: (Transport) FCS Recovery and Medical Treatment Maintenance Vehicle and Evacuation ARV-A (L) MULE: (Countermine) Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited, TACOM 28 Oct 2005, case 05-270 2 FCS “Best of Industry” Team Piasecki Aircraft Corp GGeenneerraallDDyynnaammiiccss––AAIISS DDyynnaammiiccssRReesseeaarrcchhCCoorrpp Piasecki Aircraft Corp Raytheon - NCS Essington, Pennsylvania BBlloooommiinnggttoonn,,MMiinnnneessoottaa Raytheon - NCS AAnnddoovveerr,,MMaassssaacchhuusseettttss Essington, Pennsylvania FFtt..WWaayynnee,,IInnddiiaannaa BBAAEESSyysstteemmss--GGSSDD General Dynamics Textron Systems SSaannttaaCClalarraa,,CCaalilfifoorrnniaia BBAAEESSyysstteemmss--AASSDD General Dynamics Textron Systems General Dynamics WWiillmmiinnggttoonn,,MMaassssaacchhuusseettttss MMiinnnneeaappoolliiss,,MMiinnnneessoottaa LLaannddSSyysstteemmss General Dynamics SStteerrlliinnggHHeeiigghhttss,,MMiicchhiiggaann RRoobboottiiccssSSyysstteemmss WWeessttmmiinnsstteerr,,MMaarryyllaanndd iiRRoobboottCCoorrpp NNoorrtthhrrooppGGrruummmmaann BBuurrlliinnggttoonn,,MMaassssaacchhuusseettttss BBooeeiinngg––MMccDDoonnnneellll Mission Systems Mission Systems DDoouuggllaassHHeelliiccoopptteerrCCoo.. Carson, California Carson, California MMeessaa,,AArriizzoonnaa BBAAEESSyysstteemmss--CCNNIIRR WWaayynnee,,NNeewwJJeerrsseeyy HHoonneeyywweellll--IIDDAASS AAllbbuuqquueerrqquuee,,NNeewwMMeexxiiccoo AAAAIICCoorrpp LLoocckkhheeeeddMMaarrttiinn LLoocckkhheeeeddMMaarrttiinn HHuunnttVVaallleeyy,,MMaarryyllaanndd ((OOrriinnccoonn))DDeeffeennsseeCCoorrpp MMiissssiilleess&&FFiirreeCCoonnttrrooll SSaannDDiieeggoo,,CCaalliiffoorrnniiaa GGrraannddPPrraaiirriiee,,TTeexxaass NNoorrtthhrrooppGGrruummmmaann–– EElleeccttrroonniiccSSyysstteemmssCCMMSS BBeellccaammpp,,MMaarryyllaanndd NNoorrtthhrrooppGGrruummmmaann SSyysstteemmssCCoorrppoorraattiioonn San Diego, California Computer Science Corp San Diego, California TTeelleeddyynneeBBrroowwnnEEnngg Computer Science Corp Falls Church, Virginia HHuunnttssvviilllee,,AAllaabbaammaa Falls Church, Virginia GGeenneerraallDDyynnaammiiccss CC44SSyysstteemmss OOvveerrwwaattcchhSSyysstteemmss RRaayytthheeoonnCCoommppaannyy NNoorrtthhrrooppGGrruummmmaannIInnffooTTeecchh SSccoottttssddaallee,,AArriizzoonnaa AAuussttiinn,,TTeexxaass PPllaannoo,,TTeexxaass MMccLLeeaann,,VViirrggiinniiaa Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited, TACOM 28 Oct 2005, case 05-270 3 FCS One Team Industry Base 34 States, 156 Congressional Districts, 358 Suppliers Massachusetts New Mexico CD 4 – L – General Dynamics C4S; S – Metavr Inc. CD 1 – L – Honeywell IDAS; L – Northrop Grumman Mission Systems CD 5 – L – Dynamics Research Corporation; S – IISI Corp.; New York S – I-Logix CD 1 – S – MJI Associates CD 6 – LF – BAE Systems; L – Textron Systems; S – iRobot Corporation; S – CD 2 – L – BAE Systems Information & Technology Contact East Inc.; S – L-Com Inc. CD 8 – S – Adacore Technologies CD 7 – S – IPSwitch Inc.; L – Netegrity; S – Mathworks Inc. CD 21 – L – TACOM-ARDEC Benet Laboratories CD 8 – L – BAE Systems CNIR; L – BBN Solutions LLC (BBN) CD 22 – L – BAE Systems Control CD 29 – L – Impact Technologies LLC; L – Schweizer Aircraft Corporation CD 8 – S – Mak Technologies CD 9 – S – Parametric Technology Corp; L – GD C4 Systems Ohio CD 10 – WOSB – Microway Inc CD 3 – L – MTC Technologies Inc. CD 4 – S – GTJ Enterprises Maryland CD 5 – L – Verhoff Machine & Welding CD 6 – L – Titanium Metals Corp CD 2 – WOSB – Cybercore Technologies; L – DFAS Finance Officer; L – CD 7 – L – AFRL/SNJW Northrop Grumman Electronic Systems CMS (Belcamp); CD 8 – L – Northrop Grumman – Xetron L – Northrop Grumman Corporation (Linthicum); L – Titan Systems Corporation CD 15 – L – Battelle Memorial Institute CD 3 – S – Rohde & Schwartz Inc.; L – Alion Science & Technology Corporation; WOSB –Cengen Incorporated; L – Prospective Technology Oklahoma CD 4 – WOSB – Sel-tronics Primestock; VOSB – MilVets System Technology Inc CD 4 – FSDB – Tec-Masters Inc.; S – Telos OK, LLC CD 5 - E/XOSB – Sayres & Associates; L – Army Research Laboratory Oregon CD 6 – L – General Dynamics Robotic System CD 1 – L – Heifetz, Halle Consulting Group LLC; L – Tektronix Incorporated Alabama CD 8 – WOSB – Intelligent Automation Inc.; S – Akman Associates Incorporated; S Pennsylvania CD 2 – VOSB – Navigator Development Group Inc. – Robotic Research; S – Opnet Technologies; CD 9 – S – Kotlanger Management Consulting CD 5 – WOSB – S E A Wire & Cable Inc.; WOSB – Aerospace Products S.E., Inc. ; S – VOSB – Whitaker Bros Bus Mchs; S – Spread Concepts CD 13 – S – Gemplus Corporation Camber Corporation; D/VOSB – Colsa Corporation; S – Dese Research Inc; WOSB/P – CD 14 – L – National Robotics Engineering Consortium; SDB – Timesys Corporation 3D Research Corporation; D/VOSB – All Points Logistics; WOSB – Byte Size Maine CD 18 – S – Black Box Corp of PA Incorporated; S – Dynetics; S – Dynetics Inc.; S – Applied Data Trends; S – Sparta, Inc.; CD 1 – S – Fiber Materials Inc. CD 19 – VOSB – International Logistics Systems Inc. L – Teledyne Brown Engineering; L – The Aegis Technologies Group Michigan South Carolina Arkansas CD 1 – S – Great Lakes Sound & Vibration Inc.; SZ – Signature Research CD 1 - S - Innovative Decisions Inc. CD 4 –S – National Technical Systems Incorporated; S – Thermoanalytics Inc.; CD 2 – S – Vetronix Research Corporation S/Hub – Creative Composites Arizona CD 6 – S – Independent Logistics Mgt Texas CD 3 – D/WOSB – Precision Computer Services, Inc. S – VXI Technology; L – Greg Cooper; L – Onesource Distributors Incorporated CD 9 – D/WOSB – Dynamic Computer Corporation; S – Oasis Advanced CD 3 – WOSB – M and J Strategies Inc; S – Mustang Technology; E/WOSB – QC Plus CD 5 – SDB – Scientific Monitoring Inc.; S – Execuspec Inc.; N/A – Stoutware Software CD 48 – S – SM&A; L – Western Design; S – Sparta; Engineering Inc. Computers; L – Raytheon GSD, MFRFS; L – Raytheon Network Centric Systems; Engineering; L – GD C4 Systems; WOSB/Hub – Embedded Plus; L – Insight Direct, Inc. LF – Telelogic Incorporated CD 10 – WOSB – SRI; S – TM Lytle Group Incorporated; DV/WOSB – Savage Precision Fabrication Inc.; L – Software Spectrum Inc. CD 6 – L – The Boeing Company (Rotorcraft Div.) CD 49 – S – Cercom Inc. L – General Dynamics Land Systems; S – Fori Automation; CD 4 – S – CAE Soft Corp CD 8 – L – SAIC CD 50 – L – Kontron America Inc.; S – Kaiser Electro-Optics Inc.; S – Tadpole Technology S – Norbert Industries Inc. CD 5 – S – Techprodx Group; WOSB – Aerospace Fasteners LLC; WOSB – Vincent Enterprises; S – Rational Concepts; L – WFI Government Services Inc. CD 11 – S – Automotive System Integrators CD 6 – S – JR’s Machine Shop CD 52 – S – Anzus Incorporated; S – Intelligent Automation Corp.; Northrop Grumman California Unmanned Systems CD 12 – S – RIIS LLC CD 7 – S – Vector ESP Inc.; S – Welcom CD 4 – L – Hewlett-Packard Company CD 53 – L – Lockheed Martin Orincon CD 15 – L – Applied Dynamics International; S – Altarum Institute; L – CD 16 – S – Technical Solutions Inc. CD 6 – D/WOSB/P – GC Micro Corp; L – Symmetricom Inc Optimetrics Incorporated CD 21 – VOSB – Austin Info Systems Inc.; L – National Instruments Corporation CD 7 – S – Applied Poleramic Colorado CD 22 – S – Naknan Incorporated CD 9 – S – WAYT Technologies CD 1 – S – Jabber Incorporated Minnesota CD 24 – L – Lockheed Martin Missiles & Fire Controls CD 11 – L – Cabelco Technologies; L - Documentum CD 2 – WOSB – Micro Analysis and Design; S – Visual Numerics Inc CD 1 – L – Emcor Enclosures, Crenlo CD 25 – S – Symtx Incorporated CD 12 –VOSB – Ares Corporation CD 5 – S – Altia Corporation; S – Distributed Environment Solution CD 3 – L – General Dynamics Advanced Info Systems; S – Architecture CD 26 – L – Graybar Electric Company Inc.; L – Ten on Eleven Incorporated CD 13 – L - Sun Microsystems Computer Corp.; S – Phihong USA; L - Truetel CD 6 – L - Agilent Technologies Inc.; L – Lockheed Martin IS&S; S – PercepTek Inc. Technology Corporation CD 29 – L – Intec Engineering Technologies Inc. CD 7 – VOSB – IPSMeteostar CD 5 – L – Honeywell, Minneapolis; L – United Defense LP, ASD; L – Honeywell CD 30 – SEB – Quality Solutions Inc.; L – Southwestern Bell Tele Co CD 14 – L – Silicon Graphics, Inc.; S –Real-Time Innovations Inc.; WOSB – Stellar International, Inc. CD 32 – WOSB – Archive Supplies Inc.; S – Communications Supply Corp; WOSB – Solutions; – Veritas Incorporated; L – SRI International; S – Bluecoat Systems; Connecticut Data Projections Inc.; S – Source Inc. S – Trolltech Incorporated; L – Tibco CD 4 – WOSB – Omega Engineering Inc Missouri CD 15 – L – NGMS/ISD/ESL; L – United Defense LP GSD; CD 1 – SDB – World Wide Technologies; S – Object Computing Incorporated Virginia L – Xilinx Inc.; S – Foundry Networks; L – Sun Microsystems Incorporated Florida CD
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2020 Corporate Sustainability Report
    TRANSPARENCY. TRUST. ALIGNMENT. HONESTY. 2020 Corporate Sustainability Report OUR ETHOS TRANSPARENCY. TRUST. ALIGNMENT. HONESTY. These four values undergird everything we do at General Dynamics — they are our defining moral character. All of us at General Dynamics have a duty to behave according to these values. Through our shared Ethos, we ensure that we continue to be good stewards of the investments our shareholders, customers, employees and communities make in us, now and in the future. TABLE OF CONTENTS OUR ETHOS 2 A Letter From Our CEO 4 OUR BUSINESS 5 Our Values at Work 6 Business Overview 7 Corporate Responsibility 10 Global Supply Chain 12 GOVERNANCE 14 Corporate Governance 15 Ethics 18 Information Security 21 HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT 25 Employee Safety 26 Employee Well-Being 27 Developing and Engaging Our Talent 28 DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION 29 Diversity Is Critical to Innovation 30 Talent Recruiting and Retaining Diverse Talent 32 Awards & Recognition 36 ENVIRONMENT 37 Environmental Responsibility 38 Examples From Our Businesses 41 COMMUNITY RELATIONS 45 Investing in Our Communities 46 COVID-19 Response 50 REPORTING APPROACH 52 A Letter from Our CEO Dear Fellow Shareholder, Corporate sustainability at General Dynamics is rooted in our Ethos — our defining moral character as a company and the standard to which we hold ourselves and our more than 100,000 employees worldwide. It informs all that we do and guides us as we deliver value to our shareholders, our customers and our communities. Ongoing conversations with all of our stakeholders have been an integral part of building and evolving our sustainability program. We remain committed to reducing our global environmental impact, including our carbon footprint; protecting and promoting human rights; increasing the diversity of our workforce; supporting the health, welfare and safety of our employees; and fostering mutually beneficial relationships with our communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Egger Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c87w6jb1 Online items available Daniel Egger papers Finding aid prepared and updated by Gina C Giang. Manuscripts Department The Huntington Library 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2191 Fax: (626) 449-5720 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org © Finding aid last updated June 2019. The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. Daniel Egger papers mssEgger 1 Descriptive Summary Title: Daniel Egger papers Inclusive Dates: 1927-2019 Collection Number: mssEgger Collector: Egger, Daniel Frederic Extent: 3 boxes, 1 oversize folder, 1 flash drive, and 1 tube (1.04 linear feet) Repository: The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens Manuscripts Department 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2191 Fax: (626) 449-5720 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org Abstract: The Daniel Egger papers include correspondence, printed matter, and photographs related to Daniel Egger’s career in the aerospace industry. Language of Material: The records are in English and Spanish. Access Collection is open to qualified researchers by prior application through the Reader Services Department. For more information, please go to following web site . NOT AVAILABLE: The collection contains one flash drive, which is unavailable until reformatted. Please contact Reader Services for more information. RESTRICTED: Tube 1 (previously housed in Box 1, folder 1). Due to size of original, original will be available only with curatorial permission. Publication Rights The Huntington Library does not require that researchers request permission to quote from or publish images of this material, nor does it charge fees for such activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the PDF File
    Nick: Invisibility sounds like something out of a work of Sci-Fi. However, Northrop Grumman’s B2 Spirit is just that. While the B2 is not invisible to the naked eye, it can avoid detection by radar thanks to a specially designed frame and coating that deflects and nullifies radar waves. Radar waves are sent outwards, and bounce off of features such as engines and straight wings. By altering its shape and applying radar absorbent material, the B2 is able to minimize the radar waves that can be analyzed, making the B2 almost impossible to find. On top of being a stealth plane, the B2 is a flying wing, meaning it has no fuselage or tail. The B2 is meant to be a low observable stealth plane used to penetrate anti-aircraft defenses. It can carry both conventional and thermonuclear weapons, and is a unique aircraft that can carry heavy air-to-surface weapons while also remaining in stealth. But where did this technology come from? Daryl: As soon as radar was developed during World War Two, there was a need to evade radar. Efforts were made during and after the war to counter radar, and two German brothers were the first to find a solution. Walter and Reimar Horton were pilots with the German Luftwaffe, but also designed aircraft of their own. One of these was the Horton HO-229 jet, the earliest flying wing propelled by a jet, which also had radar wave absorbing material on the wings. They used a wood-carbon powder to absorb radar waves, making this the earliest stealth plane.
    [Show full text]
  • BOMBS AWAY' from 60,0
    The unconventional, far-ahead, supersonic B-58 Hustler is poised combat-ready at Cars- well AFB in Texas — a new addition to the free world's deterrent strength. USAF air- men and their B-58s have been engaged in intensive training. They have also taken time out to rewrite a page or two of the record book . 'BOMBS AWAY' from 60,0 Col. J. K. Johnson, USAF FORMER COMMANDER, 43d BOMB WING (M), SAC HE TARGET is Deerfield, Mass. You're twelve sive. It may not quite rival those reported by miles up, moving at twice the speed of sound. high-altitude record setters and balloonists, or T But there's no sense of speed, of motion. You nation's first Astronaut, but it still covers a giant fi seem to be hanging high above the earth on an in- of vision. To the right, far below, are the lights visible thread strung from somewhere in the universe. Buffalo, N. Y., 150 miles away. You see a lot of te It's calm, smooth, peaceful, quiet—in sharp con- tory from a dozen miles up—although you don't rea trast to the dread lethality of your bomb load. Actu- need to for purposes of this mission. All the infa ally, the bomb load is simulated. This is a practice mation required to plunk your "electronic payloac strike. It could be for real. Deerfield, some 3,500 on target is carried in black boxes in the plane. It miles from home base by a circuitous exercise route, automatically fed to computers to keep you on ems! provides a particular pattern on a radar screen.
    [Show full text]
  • “Keep the Dream Alive”
    February 28, 2015 The 60th Annual Honors and Awards Banquet “Keep the Dream Alive” February 28, 2015 th 60 Honors & Awards Banquet Diamond Anniversary 1 The 60th Annual Honors and Awards Banquet February 28, 2015 National Engineers Week Committees ~ BANQUET COMMITTEE ~ Kenneth Davis, Sonja Domazet, Stephen Guine, William Johnson, Sharlene Katz, Paul Landry, Robert Tarn, Thomas R. Tarn, Charles Volk ~ HONORS & AWARDS COMMITTEE ~ Marek Barylak, Kenneth Davis, Stephen Guine, Sharlene Katz, Paul Landry, Charles Olsefsky, R. Freeman Straub, Robert B. Tarn ~ AWARDS ASSEMBLY ~ Ken Davis, Sonja Domazet, James Flynn, Bill Johnson, Sharlene Katz, Charles Olsefsky ~ HOST / HOSTESSES ~ Olivia Landry, Maria Tarn ~ SOUVENIR PROGRAM GRAPHICS & DESIGN ~ Paul Landry ~ AWARD GRAPHICS ~ Mike Matte ~ AUDIO / VIDEO ~ Swank Audio Visuals, Carlos Guerra ~ BANQUET SETUP / AWARDS DISTRIBUTION ~ Marissa Bayless, Margo Guerra ~ MATH COUNTS ~ Jerry Kraim, Eli Stiny Engineers’ Council Past Presidents 1970 William B. Johnson 1992 Robert Budica 2005 Robert B. Tarn 1980 Clifford B. Shiepe, PE 1993 Lloyd W. Higginbotham, FIAE 2006 Paul F. Landry 1981 Clifford B. Shiepe, PE 1994 Lloyd W. Higginbotham, FIAE 2007 Paul F. Landry 1982 Lloyd W. Higginbotham, FIAE 1995 Lloyd W. Higginbotham, FIAE 2008 Patrick Berbon 1983 William F. Hassel, PE, FIAE 1996 Lloyd W. Higginbotham, FIAE 2009 Dr. Charles H. Volk 1984 Clifford Terry 1997 Lloyd W. Higginbotham, FIAE 2010 Dr. Charles H. Volk 1985 Roland V. Roggero 1998 Lloyd W. Higginbotham, FIAE 2011 Kenneth G. Davis 1986 James P. Ritchey 1999 Lloyd W. Higginbotham, FIAE 2012 Kenneth G. Davis 1987 James P. Ritchey 2000 Lloyd W. Higginbotham, FIAE 2013 Sonja Domazet 1988 Harlan L. Russ 2001 Lloyd W.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT of NEW YORK ------X : in Re : Chapter 11 Case No
    09-50026-reg Doc 15 Filed 06/01/09 Entered 06/01/09 09:30:20 Main Document Pg 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x : In re : Chapter 11 Case No. : CHEVROLET-SATURN OF HARLEM, INC., : 09-_____ (___) : Debtor. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------x : In re : Chapter 11 Case No. : GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, : 09-_____ (___) : Debtor. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------x : : In re : Chapter 11 Case No. : SATURN, LLC, : 09-_____ (___) : Debtor. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------x : In re : Chapter 11 Case No. : SATURN DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION, : 09-_____ (___) : Debtor. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------x CORPORATE OWNERSHIP STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. BANKR. P. 1007(a)(1) AND LOCAL RULE OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE 1007-3 Pursuant to Rule 1007(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rule 1007-3 of the Local Rules for the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, Chevrolet-Saturn of Harlem, Inc. (“Chevrolet-Saturn”), General Motors NY2:\1991994\07\16P1607!.DOC\72240.0635 09-50026-reg Doc 15 Filed 06/01/09 Entered 06/01/09 09:30:20 Main Document Pg 2 of 6 Corporation (“GM”), Saturn, LLC (“Saturn”), and Saturn Distribution Corporation (“Saturn Distribution”), as debtors and debtors in possession, respectfully represent as follows: 1. 100% of Chevrolet-Saturn’s equity is directly owned by GM. 2. 17.0% of GM’s equity is directly or indirectly owned by State Street Bank and Trust Company. 3. 100% of Saturn’s membership interests is directly owned by GM. 4. 100% of Saturn Distribution’s equity is directly owned by Saturn and indirectly owned by GM.
    [Show full text]
  • General Dynamics Electric Boat Invoices
    General Dynamics Electric Boat Invoices tastedBruce panningswhole while prehistorically small-town Constantineif inessive Stanly monkey sleeved that sumpters.or vitalised. Festinate and sprightliest Rodrick sectarianizing some limos so lingually! Morton still The invoicing party of command and the developer shall be construed as this retirement benefits are currently under this Ifeither part breache an ofthe terms provisions orconditions ofthis Agreementb. Gtin information with written notice and this allegation is used as we also be. At General Dynamics Electric Boat We hook the sentence that. The versatile Greyhound can void support special operations and distinguished visitor transport requirements. Landlord of any or all other rights or remedies provided for in this Lease, if any, or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute or otherwise. Conflict mineral that year of invoices received from raw materials per share data, legal meaning to minimiz terroristhreat throug th. We are using cookies to give you the best experience follow our website. To the extent backlog has not been funded, there is no assurance that congressional appropriations or agency allotments will be forthcoming. Assigned to the Military Sealift Command they are manned by civilian mariners. AGREEMENT GENERAL DYNAMICS ELECTRIC BOAT. Electric boat corporation company estimates made in advanced gun and all gtins may be. City any attempt to supplying any manner cannot pay to take a general dynamics electric boat invoices have the delivery of being used. Terminal range of invoices received from indeed, service providers and deduction of? Haanyon eve aske me a captcha proves you agree on gold for general dynamics electric boat pursuant to.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C – Key Studies on Aircraft Deviation ACRP 4-09 - Risk Assessment Method to Support Modification of Airfield Separation Standards
    Appendix C – Key Studies on Aircraft Deviation ACRP 4-09 - Risk Assessment Method to Support Modification of Airfield Separation Standards The following table summarizes some of the most relevant studies addressing lateral aircraft deviations during runway, taxiway and taxilane operations. The models developed by Scholz (2003a and 2003b) were used in the approach to analyze taxiway and taxilane separations. Table C-1. Relevant studies on aircraft lateral deviation in airfields Title Year/Author Description Evaluation of Brown & This study was conducted with test sections for B-47 Existing Thompson, 1973 (Stratojet), B-52, KC-87, and KC-135 aircraft. The Airfields for C- report also makes reference to studies conducted in 1949 5A Operations and field observations carried out in 1956. The concept of wander was introduced. Wander was defined as “the maximum lateral movement of a point on the centerline of an aircraft about the centerline (or guideline) on taxiways or runways during operation of the aircraft.” The lateral deviations for those aircraft from the taxiway and runway centerlines can be considered as approximately 3.2 ft and 33.7 ft, respectively, during 75 percent of the time. Field Survey and HoSang, 1975 Deviation data were collected from 9 airports and 12 Analysis of types of commercial aircraft with maximum gross Aircraft weights above 50,000 pounds, including: Boeing 747, Distribution on 707, 727 and 737; McDonnell-Douglas DC-10, DC-8 and Airport DC-9; Lockheed L-1101; General Dynamics Convair 880 Pavements and 580; British Aircraft Corporation BAC-111; and Nihon YS-11. The standard deviations for individual aircraft types, compared at the various airports, varied from 3 to 8 ft for takeoffs and from 4 to 9 ft for landings.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Corps Advanced Reconnaissance Vehicle (ARV)
    Updated June 10, 2021 Marine Corps Advanced Reconnaissance Vehicle (ARV) What Is the Advanced Reconnaissance anti-armor capability to defeat close-in heavy armor Vehicle (ARV)? threats; According to the Marine Corps, the Advanced Reconnaissance Vehicle (ARV) aims to be a new armored precision-guided munitions (PGMs) to defeat threats vehicle family to replace the Light Armored Vehicle (LAV) beyond the engagement range of threat systems; (Figure 1): Since the 1980s, the Light Armored Vehicle (LAV) unmanned systems swarm capability to provide persistent, multifunction munitions; has supported Marine Air-Ground Task Force missions on the battlefield. While the LAV remains advanced, networked, multifunctional electronic warfare operationally effective, the life cycle of this system (EW ) capabilities; is set to expire in the mid-2030s…. The Advanced Reconnaissance Vehicle (ARV) [the LAV’s a modern command-and-control suite and a full range of replacement] will be highly mobile, networked, sensors to enhance and extend reconnaissance and transportable, protected, and lethal. The capability surveillance ranges; will provide, sensors, communication systems and lethality options to overmatch threats that have organic unmanned aerial and ground systems historically been addressed with more heavily (UAS/UGS) that can be deployed from the ARV; armored systems. The ARV will be an advanced combat vehicle system, capable of fighting for active and passive vehicle protection capabilities to information that balances competing capability sense, orient, classify, track, and defeat incoming demands to sense, shoot, move, communicate and rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs), anti-tank guided remain transportable as part of the naval missiles (ATGMs), and PGM threats with hard-and soft- expeditionary force.
    [Show full text]
  • Sherman Oaks, California
    Sherman Oaks, California Theodore von Kármán Engineer of the Year Educator of the Year Achievement Award Mr. Eric D. Knutson Dr. Melvin A. Breuer Dr. Buzz Aldrin Director of Advanced Projects Professor Astronaut, Apollo XI Lockheed Martin Skunkworks University of Southern Retired Colonel, USAF Palmdale, California California Author and Space Los Angeles, California Advocate th 56 Annual HONORS AND AWARDS BANQUET Saturday, February 26, 2011 In Celebration of National Engineers Week, February 20-26, 2011 National Engineers Week Committees Banquet Committee: Marek Barylak, Robert Budica, Larry Dalton, Kenneth Davis, Sonja Domazet, Carlos & Margo Guerra, Stephen Guine, William Johnson, Jerry Kraim, Diane Kulisek, Paul Landry, Charles Olsefsky, S. K. Ramesh, Rick Ratcliffe, Ramin Roosta, Noelle Segura, R. Freeman Straub, Robert Tarn, Charles Volk Honors & Awards Committee: Kenneth Davis, Diane Kulisek, Paul Landry, Charles Olsefsky, R. Freeman Straub, Robert Tarn Visual Media Services: Warren Huskey, Mike Matte Awards Assembly Marek Barylak, Larry Dalton, Kenneth Davis, Sonja Domazet, William Johnson, Diane Kulisek, Sharlene Katz, Charles Olsefsky, Ramin Roosta, R. Freeman Straub, Charles Volk Hostesses: Mary Claire Jensen, Mickey Knobloch, Olivia Landry, Maria Tarn Audio/Video: Swank Audio Visuals Award Presenters: Sonja Domazet, Stephen Guine, William Johnson, Paul Landry, Robert Tarn, Charles Volk Banquet Setup/Awards Distribution: Margo Guerra, CSUN Engineering Students Math Counts: Jerry Kraim LA County Science Bowl: Larry Dalton First Robotics: R. Freeman Straub The Engineers’ Council Board of Directors President Vice President Treasurer Secretary Kenneth G. Davis Sonja Domazet Dr. Charles H. Volk Robert B. Tarn Trustees: Dr. Robert J. Budica, Paul F. Landry, Dr. A. F. Ratcliffe, Robert B.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Flight Dynamics Model of a Flying Wing Configuration
    Master thesis in Aeronautical Engineering Development of a Flight Dynamics Model of a Flying Wing Configuration Candidate Supervisor Jacopo Tonti Prof. Guido De Matteis External supervisor Prof. Arthur Rizzi (Kungliga Tekniska högskolan) Academic Year 2013/2014 cbn 2014 by Jacopo Tonti Some rights reserved. This thesis is available under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-3.0 IT License. (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/it/) Alla mia musa , a Vale «As ailerons, these damn spoilers make great rudders!» Bruce Miller, after flying the Marske Pioneer 1A Abstract The subject of UCAV design is an important topic nowadays and many countries have their own programmes. An international group, under the initiative of the NATO RTO AVT-201 Task group, titled “Extended Assessment of Reliable Stability & Control Pre- diction Methods for NATO Air Vehicles”, is currently performing intensive analysis on a generic UCAV configuration, named SACCON. In this thesis the stability and control characteristics of the SACCON are investigated, with the purpose of carrying out a compre- hensive assessment of the flying qualities of the design. The study included the generation of the complete aerodynamic database of the aircraft, on the basis of the experimental data measured during TN2514 and TN2540 campaigns at DNW-NWB low speed wind tunnel. Moreover, system identification techniques were adopted for the extraction of dynamic derivatives from the time histories of forced oscillation runs. The trim of the aircraft was evaluated across the points of a reasonable test envelope, so as to define a set of plausible operative conditions, representing the reference conditions for subsequent linearization of the dynamic model.
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego History Center Is a Museum, Education Center, and Research Library Founded As the San Diego Historical Society in 1928
    The Journal of San Diego Volume 58 Fall 2012 Number 4 • The Journal of San Diego Number History 2012 58 Fall Volume History Publication of The Journal of San Diego History is underwritten by a major grant from the Quest for Truth Foundation, established by the late James G. Scripps. Additional support is provided by “The Journal of San Diego History Fund” of the San Diego Foundation and private donors. The color section for the Charles Reiffel Exhibit Review has been underwritten by Thompson Fetter. The San Diego History Center is a museum, education center, and research library founded as the San Diego Historical Society in 1928. Its activities are supported by: the City of San Diego’s Commission for Arts and Culture; the County of San Diego; individuals; foundations; corporations; fundraising events; membership dues; admissions; shop sales; and rights and reproduction fees. Articles appearing in The Journal of San Diego History are abstracted and indexed in Historical Abstracts and America: History and Life. The paper in the publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Science-Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. Front Cover: Charles Reiffel, San Diego Harbor. Oil on Canvas, 1936. The San Diego History Center on loan from the Fine Arts Program, Public Building Services, US General Administration, commissioned through the New Deal art projects. Charles Reiffel: An American Post-Impressionist, Catalogue No. 63. Back Cover: Charles Reiffel, detail from History of San Diego—Colonial, 1939. The San Diego History Center, gift of Donna Sefton. Cover Design: Allen Wynar The Journal of San Diego History IRIS H.
    [Show full text]