693 No. 743. the EXCHANGE CONTROL LAWS, 1952 and 1954

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

693 No. 743. THE EXCHANGE CONTROL LAWS, 1952 AND 1954. ORDER MADE BY THE FINANCIAL SECRETARY UNDER SECTION 2 (I). In exercise of the powers vested in me by section 2 (1) of the Exchange Control Laws, 1952 and 1954 (hereinafter referred to as " the Laws "), I, the Financial Secretary, hereby order as follows :— .1. This Order may be cited as the Exchange Control (Authorized Dealers) Order, 1954. · .-...- 2. The persons specified in the Schedule hereto are hereby authorized to act for the purposes of the Laws as authorized dealers in relation to gold and foreign currency. 3. The Exchange Control (Authorized Dealers) Order, 1953, is hereby Gazette: revoked. ' Suppl. No 18.9.1953. SCHEDULE. The Ottoman Bank. Barclays Bank D.C.O. The Ionian Bank Limited. The Bank of Cyprus Limited. The Popular Bank of Limassol Limited. National Bank of Greece and Athens. The Turkish Bank of Nicosia Limited. Turkiye Is, Bankasi A.§. Made this 28th day of December, 1954. A. F. BATES, (M.P. 1100/5 I/M.) Financial Secretary'. ? EXPLANATORY NOTE. ■■, {This Note is not part of the Order, but is intended to indicate its , general purport). Ρ This Order lists the banks authorized to deal in g9ld and foreign currency and differs from the previous Order in that Turkiye ί§ Bankasi A.§. has been added to the Schedule of the Order. No. 744. THE TREE PLANTING (VILLAGE AREAS) LAW. CAP. 175. NOTIFICATION MADE UNDER SECTION 17. Lefkoniko (Famagusta) Fund. In exercise of the powers vested in me by section 17 of the Tree Planting (Village Areas) Law, I hereby establish a fund for the village of Lefkoniko in the District of Famagusta (hereinafter called the " Fund") into which shall be paid all fines recovered under the said Law for offences committed within the Tree Planting Area of the village of Lefkoniko as described in the Order of the Commissioner of Famagusta published in Supplement No. 3 to the Cyprus Gazette No. 3796 of the 16th December, 1954, under Notification No. 702. The Fund shall be under the management and control of the Com missioner of Famagusta for the time being. The money in the Fund shall be utilized for works of public utility in the village of Lefkoniko. Made at Famagusta, this 20th day of December, 1954. B. J. WESTON, (M.P. 8030/54.) Commissioner of Famagusta. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Famagusta Debate
BRIEFING PAPER Number 7387, 16 November 2015 By Arabella Lang Famagusta debate Inside: 1. The Famagusta dispute 2. Cyprus settlement negotiations 3. Appendix www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 7387, 16 November 2015 2 Contents Summary 3 1. The Famagusta dispute 4 1.1 Backbench business debate 4 1.2 What happened to Famagusta? 4 1.3 Proposals 5 2. Cyprus settlement negotiations 6 2.1 UN negotiations 6 Recent developments 6 Up to 2014 7 2.2 Cyprus-EU relations 8 2.3 Cyprus-UK relations 10 3. Appendix 12 3.1 European Parliament declaration 12 3.2 Security Council resolutions 12 Cover page image copyright: Chamber-070 by UK Parliament image. Licensed under CC BY 2.0 / image cropped. 3 Famagusta debate Summary The House of Commons is debating a Backbench Business motion on Famagusta on 16 November 2015. It calls for the Cypriot city of Famagusta to be returned by Turkey to its ‘lawful inhabitants’. After the Turkish invasion of Cyprus in 1974, Famagusta became part of the ‘Turkish Republic of North Cyprus’ (TRNC). The TRNC operates a large free port and zone at Famagusta, although the Republic of Cyprus has declared this closed. A section of Famagusta called Varosha has remained closed off by the Turkish military since 1974, becoming a ghost town. Famagusta is often seen as one of the keys to a permanent settlement for Cyprus and to unblocking Turkey’s stalled EU accession process. UN-sponsored negotiations for a permanent settlement for Cyprus restarted in 2015 following the election of a new leader in the TRNC.
[Show full text]
Dual Naming of Sea Areas in Modern Atlases and Implications for the East Sea/Sea of Japan Case
Dual naming of sea areas in modern atlases and implications for the East Sea/Sea of Japan case Rainer DORMELS* Dual naming is, to varying extents, present in nearly all atlases. The empirical research in this paper deals with the dual naming of sea areas in about 20 atlases from different nations in the years from 2006 to 2017. Objective, quality, and size of the atlases and the country where the atlases originated from play a key role. All these characteristics of the atlases will be taken into account in the paper. In the cases of dual naming of sea areas, we can, in general, differentiate between: cases where both names are exonyms, cases where both names are endonyms, and cases where one name is an endonym, while the other is an exonym. The goal of this paper is to suggest a typology of dual names of sea areas in different atlases. As it turns out, dual names of sea areas in atlases have different functions, and in many atlases, dual naming is not a singular exception. Dual naming may help the users of atlases to orientate themselves better. Additionally, dual naming allows for providing valuable information to the users. Regarding the naming of the sea between Korea and Japan present study has achieved the following results: the East Sea/Sea of Japan is the sea area, which by far showed the most use of dual naming in the atlases examined, in all cases of dual naming two exonyms were used, even in atlases, which allow dual naming just in very few cases, the East Sea/Sea of Japan is presented with dual naming.
[Show full text]
Cyprus Tourism Organisation Offices 108 - 112
CYPRUS 10000 years of history and civilisation CONTENTS CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 CYPRUS 10000 years of history and civilisation 6 THE HISTORY OF CYPRUS 8200 - 1050 BC Prehistoric Age 7 1050 - 480 BC Historic Times: Geometric and Archaic Periods 8 480 BC - 330 AD Classical, Hellenistic and Roman Periods 9 330 - 1191 AD Byzantine Period 10 - 11 1192 - 1489 AD Frankish Period 12 1489 - 1571 AD The Venetians in Cyprus 13 1571 - 1878 AD Cyprus becomes part of the Ottoman Empire 14 1878 - 1960 AD British rule 15 1960 - today The Cyprus Republic, the Turkish invasion, 16 European Union entry LEFKOSIA (NICOSIA) 17 - 36 LEMESOS (LIMASSOL) 37 - 54 LARNAKA 55 - 68 PAFOS 69 - 84 AMMOCHOSTOS (FAMAGUSTA) 85 - 90 TROODOS 91 - 103 ROUTES Byzantine route, Aphrodite Cultural Route 104 - 105 MAP OF CYPRUS 106 - 107 CYPRUS TOURISM ORGANISATION OFFICES 108 - 112 3 LEFKOSIA - NICOSIA LEMESOS - LIMASSOL LARNAKA PAFOS AMMOCHOSTOS - FAMAGUSTA TROODOS 4 INTRODUCTION Cyprus is a small country with a long history and a rich culture. It is not surprising that UNESCO included the Pafos antiquities, Choirokoitia and ten of the Byzantine period churches of Troodos in its list of World Heritage Sites. The aim of this publication is to help visitors discover the cultural heritage of Cyprus. The qualified personnel at any Information Office of the Cyprus Tourism Organisation (CTO) is happy to help organise your visit in the best possible way. Parallel to answering questions and enquiries, the Cyprus Tourism Organisation provides, free of charge, a wide range of publications, maps and other information material. Additional information is available at the CTO website: www.visitcyprus.com It is an unfortunate reality that a large part of the island’s cultural heritage has since July 1974 been under Turkish occupation.
[Show full text]
1 Memorandum Ownership Status of Hotels and Other
MEMORANDUM OWNERSHIP STATUS OF HOTELS AND OTHER ACCOMODATION FACILITIES IN THE OCCUPIED PART OF THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Cyprus hereby publishes a list1 of hotels situated in the Turkish occupied part of Cyprus. The majority of these hotels belong to Greek Cypriot displaced persons who were forced to leave their properties following the Turkish invasion of 1974 or have been built illegally on properties belonging to displaced Greek Cypriots, in violation of the latter’s property rights and without their consent. A number of hotels belong to Turkish Cypriots or have been built on land belonging to Turkish Cypriots. The European Court of Human Rights, in its Judgment of 18 December 1996, on the individual application of the Greek Cypriot displaced owner from Kyrenia, Mrs. Titina Loizidou, against Turkey, and in the Fourth Interstate Application of Cyprus against Turkey of 10 May 2001, upheld the rights of the refugees to their properties. In the Loizidou case, the Court ordered the Government of Turkey to compensate the applicant for the time period of deprivation of use of her property and to provide full access and allow peaceful enjoyment of her property in Kyrenia. The right of the displaced owners to their properties was reconfirmed in the decision of the European Court of Human Rights (Dec. 2005) regarding the application of Myra Xenides- Arestis v. Turkey, and has since been repeatedly reconfirmed in a multitude of cases brought by Greek Cypriot owners of property in the occupied part of Cyprus against Turkey]. It should also be reminded that, according to the United Nations Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons (the Pinheiro principles) “all refugees and displaced persons have the right to have restored to them any housing, land or property of which they were arbitrarily or unlawfully deprived..”.
[Show full text]
Agia Napa Monastery
Agia Napa Monastery 1 The monastery of Agia Napa and its namesake village are located in the Famagusta district, in southeast Cyprus. The name Napa derives from the ancient Greek word “Napi”, which means wooded valley or canyon. The word is mentioned in Homer’s Iliad, in Pindar’s Pythian Odes, and later in the Christian hymnology. In the past, there was lush vegetation in that part of the Famagusta district, whereas in the area where the village and monastery exist today there used to be an idyllic wooded valley with springs. In ancient times there was a Greek city named Thronoi in that valley, and a temple dedicated to Aphrodite. With the advent of Christianity, the city declined and all that remained eventually was ruins. However, the valley with its dense forest and plentiful water supply became popular with hunters, who converged here in search of game. When the miraculous icon of Virgin Mary was found, the word spread quickly to the neighbouring villages and the cave in that remote valley became a shrine and a sacred pilgrimage for the Orthodox Christians of the area. That icon was named “The Icon of Agia Napa”, i.e. the icon of Virgin Mary of the Forest, and the shrine was named “Agia Napa”. The area around the Monastery was uninhabited until 1790, when a group of people arrived there, having fled Thessaloniki because of an outbreak of cholera. Of that group, only Nicholas Kemitzis and his son survived. The son later married a Cypriot girl from the village of Panagia, located in the hills north of the monastery, where the water of Agia Napa flows from.
[Show full text]
Monuments.Pdf
© 2017 INTERPARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY ON ORTHODOXY ISBN 978-960-560 -139 -3 Front cover page photo Sacred Monastery of Mount Sinai, Egypt Back cover page photo Saint Sophia’s Cathedral, Kiev, Ukrania Cover design Aristotelis Patrikarakos Book artwork Panagiotis Zevgolis, Graphic Designer, HELLENIC PARLIAMENT | Publications & Printing Directorate Editing George Parissis, HELLENIC PARLIAMENT | International Aﬀairs Directorate Maria Bakali, I.A.O. Secretariat Lily Vardanyan, I.A.O. Secretariat Printing - Bookbinding HELLENIC PARLIAMENT | Publications & Printing Directorate Οι πληροφορίες των κειμένων παρέχονται από τους ίδιους τους διαγωνιζόμενους και όχι από άλλες πηγές The information of texts is provided by contestants themselves and not from other sources ΠΡΟΛΟΓΟΣ Η προστασία της παγκόσμιας πολιτιστικής κληρονομιάς, υποδηλώνει την υψηλή ευθύνη της κάθε κρατικής οντότητας προς τον πολιτισμό αλλά και ενδυναμώνει τα χαρακτηριστικά της έννοιας “πολίτης του κόσμου” σε κάθε σύγχρονο άνθρωπο. Η προστασία των θρησκευτικών μνημείων, υποδηλώνει επί πλέον σεβασμό στον Θεό, μετοχή στον ανθρώ - πινο πόνο και ενθάρρυνση της ανθρώπινης χαράς και ελπίδας. Μέσα σε κάθε θρησκευτικό μνημείο, περι - τοιχίζεται η ανθρώπινη οδύνη αιώνων, ο φόβος, η προσευχή και η παράκληση των πονεμένων και αδικημένων της ιστορίας του κόσμου αλλά και ο ύμνος, η ευχαριστία και η δοξολογία προς τον Δημιουργό. Σεβασμός προς το θρησκευτικό μνημείο, υποδηλώνει σεβασμό προς τα συσσωρευμένα από αιώνες αν - θρώπινα συναισθήματα. Βασισμένη σε αυτές τις απλές σκέψεις προχώρησε η Διεθνής Γραμματεία της Διακοινοβουλευτικής Συνέ - λευσης Ορθοδοξίας (Δ.Σ.Ο.) μετά από απόφαση της Γενικής της Συνέλευσης στην προκήρυξη του δεύτερου φωτογραφικού διαγωνισμού, με θέμα: « Καταστροφή των μνημείων της Χριστιανικής Ανατολής ». Επι πλέον, η βούληση της Δ.Σ.Ο., εστιάζεται στην πρόθεσή της να παρουσιάσει στο παγκόσμιο κοινό, τον πολιτισμικό αυτό θησαυρό της Χριστιανικής Ανατολής και να επισημάνει την ανάγκη μεγαλύτερης και ου - σιαστικότερης προστασίας του.
[Show full text]
Pdf | 371.17 Kb
450000 E 500000 E 550000 E 600000 E 650000 32o 30' 33o 00' 33o 30' 34o 00' 34o 30' Cape Andreas 395000 N 395000 N HQ UNFICYP MEDITERRANEAN SEA ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻷﻣﻢ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﳊﻔﻆ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻗﱪﺹ Rizokarpaso 联塞部队部署 HQ UNPOL UNFICYP DEPLOYMENT FMPU Multinational Ayia Trias DÉPLOIEMENT DE L’UNFICYP Yialousa o o Vathylakas 35 30' 35 30' ДИСЛОКАЦИЯ ВСООНК MFR UNITED KINGDOM Sector 2 Leonarisso DESPLIEGUE DE L A UNFICYP HQ ARGENTINA Ephtakomi UNITED KINGDOM Galatia Cape Kormakiti SLOVAKIA Akanthou Komi Kebir UNPOL 500 m HQ Sector 1 Ardhana Karavas KYRENIA 500 m Kormakiti Lapithos Ayios Amvrosios Temblos Boghaz ARGENTINA / PARAGUAY / BRAZIL Dhiorios Myrtou 500 m Bellapais Trypimeni Trikomo ARGENTINA / CHILE 500 m 500 m Famagusta SECTOR 1 Lefkoniko Bay Sector 4 UNPOL VE WE K. Dhikomo Chatos WE XE HQ 390000 N UNPOL Kythrea 390000 N UNPOL VD WD ari WD XD Skylloura m Geunyeli Bey Keuy K. Monastir SLOVAKIA Mansoura Morphou am SLOVAKIA K. Pyrgos Morphou Philia Dhenia M Kaimakli Angastina Strovilia Post Kokkina Bay P. Zodhia LP 0 Prastio 90 Northing 9 Northing Selemant Limnitis Avlona UNPOL Pomos NICOSIA UNPOL 500 m Karavostasi Xeros UNPA Tymbou (Ercan) FAMAGUSTA UNPOL s s Cape Arnauti ti it a Akaki SECTOR 2 o Lefka r Kondea Kalopsidha Varosha Yialia Ambelikou n e o Arsos m m r a Khrysokhou a ro te rg Dherinia s t s Athienou SECTOR 4 e Bay is s ri SLOVAKIA t Linou A e P ( ) Mavroli rio P Athna Akhna 500 m u Marki Prodhromi Polis ko Evrykhou 500 m Klirou Troulli 1000 m S Louroujina UNPOL o o Pyla 35 00' 35 00' Kakopetria 500 mKochati Lymbia 1000 m DHEKELIA Ayia Napa Cape 500 m Pedhoulas SLOVAKIA S.B.A.
[Show full text]
Travel Planner
CYPRUS TRAVEL PLANNER CYPRUS TOURIST OFFICE – MIDDLE EAST KOPIASTE! Welcome to Cyprus Dear Traveler: There is a myriad of islands in the Mediterranean, but only one does Aphrodite, the ancient Greek goddess of love, call home, and that’s Cyprus. In 2010, Cyprus celebrated its 50th anniversary as an independent Republic, and there’s never been a better time to plan your visit. Whatever your pace or special interest, Cyprus is uniquely poised to welcome you. Our beaches are not only beautiful, they are certified as among the cleanest in Europe. And, just a short drive from the crystal clear waters of our coast are the pine-clad Troodos Mountains, where wild moufflons roam and cedars grow, and gem-like churches and monasteries are replete with unmatched Byzantine frescoes and icons. Cyprus is a haven for archaeology lovers. From Neolithic settlements more than 10,000 years old, to spectacular Greco-Roman ruins, such as the ancient seaside amphitheater of Kourion, to fortresses such as Kolossi, the list of treasures is boundless. By no means will you want to miss Pafos, a wellspring of antiquities in the west, including the mysterious Tombs of the Kings…and Roman mosaics that are so colorful, extensive and well-preserved, they are recognised by UNESCO. Although Cyprus is the third largest island in the Mediterranean, it is surprisingly compact and easy to explore. In between rugged mountain peaks and the shimmering coast you’ll traverse untrammeled landscapes and rolling hills with vineyards. Linger in idyllic villages such as Omodos and Lefkara where the rhythm slows down and there’s always time for another coffee.
[Show full text]
“Borders/ Debordering”
“BORDERS/ DEBORDERING” number 83/84 • volume 21, 2016 EDITED BY HELENA MOTOH MAJA BJELICA POLIGRAFI Editor-in-Chief: Helena Motoh (Univ. of Primorska) Editorial Board: Lenart Škof (Univ. of Primorska), Igor Škamperle (Univ. of Ljubljana), Mojca Terčelj (Univ. of Primorska), Miha Pintarič (Univ. of Ljubljana), Rok Svetlič (Univ. of Primorska), Anja Zalta (Univ. of Ljubljana) Editorial Office: University of Primorska, Science and Research Centre, Institute for Philosophical Studies, Garibaldijeva 1, SI-6000 Koper, Slovenia Phone: +386 5 6637 700, Fax: + 386 5 6637 710, E-mail: [email protected] http://www.poligrafi.si number 83/84, volume 21 (2016) “BORDERS/DEBORDERING” TOWARDS A NEW WORLD CULTURE OF HOSPITALITY Edited by Helena Motoh and Maja Bjelica International Editorial Board: Th. Luckmann (Universität Konstanz), D. Kleinberg-Levin (Northwestern University), R. A. Mall (Universität München), M. Ježić (Filozofski fakultet, Zagreb), D. Louw (University of the Free State, Bloemfontain), M. Volf (Yale University), K. Wiredu (University of South Florida), D. Thomas (University of Birmingham), M. Kerševan (Filozofska fakulteta, Ljubljana), F. Leoncini (Università degli Studi di Venezia), P. Zovatto (Università di Trieste), T. Garfitt (Oxford University), M. Zink (Collège de France), L. Olivé (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México), A. Louth (Durham University), P. Imbert (University of Ottawa), Ö. Turan (Middle-East Technical University, Ankara), E. Krotz (Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán / Universidad Autónoma de Metropolitana-Iztapalapa),
[Show full text]
FOURTH SECTION CASE of LORDOS and OTHERS V
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF LORDOS AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (Application no. 15973/90) JUDGMENT (merits) STRASBOURG 2 November 2010 FINAL 11/04/2011 This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 (c) of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. LORDOS AND OTHERS v. TURKEY JUDGMENT (MERITS) 1 In the case of Lordos and Others v. Turkey, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Nicolas Bratza, President, Lech Garlicki, Ljiljana Mijović, David Thór Björgvinsson, Ján Šikuta, Päivi Hirvelä, Işıl Karakaş, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 5 October 2010, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in an application (no. 15973/90) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by thirteen Cypriot nationals, Mr Constantinos G. Lordos, Mr Kikis L. Christofides, Mr Zacharias Spiridonos, Mr Stavros Ioannou, Mr Areti G. Ionides, Mr Michalis Evangelides, Mr Loizos D. Loizides, Mr Christos Hadjimanolis, Mr Panayiotis Sergis, Mr Georgios Misirlis, Mr Georgios Rouvas, Mrs Eleni (alias Lenia) Antoniadou and Mr Stelios Mandrides (“the applicants”), on 20 December 1989. 2. The applicants were represented by Mr A. Demetriades, a lawyer practising in Nicosia. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Z.M. Necatigil. 3. The applicants alleged, in particular, that the Turkish occupation of the northern part of Cyprus had deprived them of their homes and properties and that they had been the victims of discrimination on grounds of their ethnic origin and religious beliefs.
[Show full text]
S/5764 English Page 2
ORIGN?L: ENGIXSH REPORT BY THE SECRETARY-GENER;\L'IO m SECURITY COUNCIL ON THE UNITED NATIONS OPERATION IN CYPRUS, FOR THE PERIOD 26 APRIL To 8 JUNE 1964 INTRODUCTION 1. In accordance with the resolution of the Security Council of 4 March 1964 (S/5575), the United Nations Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus was assembled and placed under the command of Lt. General P.S. Gyani of India. After an initial period devoted to deployrcent, the Force became operational on 27 March 1964. The Security Council resolution states that it is the task of the Force, in the interest of international peace and security, (a) to prevent a recurrence of fighting; (b) to contribute to the maintenance and restoration of 1s.w and order; (c) to contribute to a return to norEal conditions. 2. On 11 Muy 1964, Mr. &do Plaza of Ecuador was appointed by the Secretary- General as his Special Representative in Cyprus to conduct discussiol!s and negotiations with the parties concernad towards achieving the objectives of UNFICYPrs mandate as outline& in paragraph 4 of the Secretary-General*s Report to the Security Council on 29 Jippril 1964. 3. The present report covers the period from 26 .!pril 1964 to 9 June 1964. Cn some occasions, and in order to present a more comprehensive ad clear picture, some actions during all the period of UIKFICYP*s presence in Cyprus are reported. The report comprises the following sections: I. Military Situation II. Political :$spects III. Economic, Social and Judiciary dspects IV. UNFIcYP's Progranae of Action (as set fort11 in paragraph 3 of annex I of Security Council document S/5671) V.
[Show full text]
Bishop Porfyrios of Neapolis of the Church of Cyprus
Speech of His Grace Bishop Porfyrios of Neapolis “Religious Freedom in the Republic of Cyprus” at the event: “Human Rights within the European Union” (05-12-2018). In July 1974, as many of you will know, Turkey invaded Cyprus with a large military force, taking advantage of the coup d’état carried out by the military junta in Greece against Archbishop Makarios III, the elected President of the Republic of Cyprus. On August 16, the fighting stopped but 43 years on, the wounds to body of the island have still not healed. Some 37% of its territory remains occupied by the Turkish army, which maintains a force of 40,000 soldiers there. In so doing, it has made Cyprus one of the most heavily militarised places in the world. Some 180,000 Greek Cypriots were expelled from their homes and properties. Today, around 500 remain enclaved in the Karpas peninsula and the Maronite villages. In November 1983, the occupation regime declared the independence of the so-called “Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus”, in a move that was condemned by the United Nations Security Council. No other country, apart from Turkey, has recognised the illegal entity. As a result of the invasion, Christian monuments and those of other faiths, sacred and archaeological sites were desecrated, looted and destroyed. Everything that adorned the 575 Orthodox churches in the occupied areas was stolen. Some 20,000 holy icons, wall paintings, mosaics, gospels, sacred vessels, manuscripts, old books, iconostases and, generally speaking, anything that could be stolen for material gain was looted and sold abroad.
[Show full text]