Famagusta Debate

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Famagusta Debate BRIEFING PAPER Number 7387, 16 November 2015 By Arabella Lang Famagusta debate Inside: 1. The Famagusta dispute 2. Cyprus settlement negotiations 3. Appendix www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 7387, 16 November 2015 2 Contents Summary 3 1. The Famagusta dispute 4 1.1 Backbench business debate 4 1.2 What happened to Famagusta? 4 1.3 Proposals 5 2. Cyprus settlement negotiations 6 2.1 UN negotiations 6 Recent developments 6 Up to 2014 7 2.2 Cyprus-EU relations 8 2.3 Cyprus-UK relations 10 3. Appendix 12 3.1 European Parliament declaration 12 3.2 Security Council resolutions 12 Cover page image copyright: Chamber-070 by UK Parliament image. Licensed under CC BY 2.0 / image cropped. 3 Famagusta debate Summary The House of Commons is debating a Backbench Business motion on Famagusta on 16 November 2015. It calls for the Cypriot city of Famagusta to be returned by Turkey to its ‘lawful inhabitants’. After the Turkish invasion of Cyprus in 1974, Famagusta became part of the ‘Turkish Republic of North Cyprus’ (TRNC). The TRNC operates a large free port and zone at Famagusta, although the Republic of Cyprus has declared this closed. A section of Famagusta called Varosha has remained closed off by the Turkish military since 1974, becoming a ghost town. Famagusta is often seen as one of the keys to a permanent settlement for Cyprus and to unblocking Turkey’s stalled EU accession process. UN-sponsored negotiations for a permanent settlement for Cyprus restarted in 2015 following the election of a new leader in the TRNC. Problematic issues still include power- sharing, security, residence and citizenship, and property issues. The talks have carried on in fits and starts since the Greek Cypriots rejected the Annan plan for a permanent settlement in a 2004 referendum. Number 7387, 16 November 2015 4 1. The Famagusta dispute 1.1 Backbench business debate The House of Commons is debating a Backbench Business motion on Famagusta on 16 November 2015. It calls for the Cypriot city of Famagusta to be returned by Turkey to its ‘lawful inhabitants’. That this House supports the comprehensive settlement of the Cyprus problem based ona bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with political equality, as set out in the relevant Security Council Resolutions and the High Level Agreements; endorses the Declaration of the European Parliament of 14 February 2012 on the return of Famagusta to its lawful inhabitants; notes that the city of Famagusta in the Republic of Cyprus was captured by the invading Turkish forces in August 1974, that a section of Famagusta was then sealed off and remains uninhabited, under the direct control of the Turkish military, and that the return of Famagusta to its lawful inhabitants would facilitate efforts toward a comprehensive settlement of the Cyprus problem; further notes the 1979 High Level Agreement and UN Security Council Resolutions 550 (1984) and 789 (1992) and the 2008 Report of the Committee on Petitions of the European Parliament on Petition 733/2004; calls on the government of Turkey to act according to those UN Security Council Resolutions and Report Recommendations and return Famagusta to its lawful inhabitants, who must resettle under conditions of security and peace; urges the Government, as a guarantor power of Cyprus, to promote Turkey's cooperation; and directs the Speaker to forward this Resolution to President Nicos Anastasiades, Mr Mustafa Akinci,the UN Secretary General and the government of Turkey. 1.2 What happened to Famagusta? Famagusta (Gazimağusa in Turkish) is a historic port city on the east coast of Cyprus. It is in the (unrecognised) ‘Turkish Republic of North Cyprus’ (TRNC), above the UN buffer zone that divides the north from the (Greek Cypriot) south: It is the de facto capital of Gazimağusa district of the TRNC, and the de jure capital of the Famagusta district (Paralimni, to the south, is currently serving as the Greek Cypriots’ district capital). 5 Famagusta debate A section of Famagusta called Varosha has remained closed off by the Turkish military since they invaded the town in 1974. It was a modern beach resort largely inhabited by Greek Cypriots, who fled at the time of the Turkish occupation. It is now a ghost town. The Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) operates a large free port and zone at Famagusta. But in 1974 the Republic of Cyprus declared all airports and ports in the area not under its effective control – including Famagusta – closed. It argued that, as the internationally recognised authority, it could not guarantee vessels’ safety. All EU and UN member states (other than Turkey) respect the closure of those ports and airports. Turkey responded by closing its ports to Cyprus-flagged and/or managed vessels, and vessels whose last port of call was Cyprus. This breaches the EU-Turkey customs union and has resulted in eight of Turkey’s EU accession negotiating ‘chapters’ for EU membership being frozen. Opening up Famagusta port could therefore have far-reaching consequences. A Library note from 2009, Cyprus: a political and economic overview,1 explains Cyprus’s history and constitutional arrangements, including independence from the UK in 1960 and division between the Greek south and Turkish north in 1974. Other Library briefings include: • Property disputes in north Cyprus, SN05663, 28 July 2010 • In brief: a closed window in Cyprus?, SN05664, 28 July 2010 1.3 Proposals Under the 2004 Annan peace plan – accepted by Turkish but not Greek Cypriots in twin referendums – the Turkish Cypriots would have been able to operate Famagusta port as part of the Turkish Cypriot state, and Varosha would have been returned to its Greek Cypriot owners. Doing this could unblock Turkey’s stalled EU accession process. In 2010 the then President of the Republic of Cyprus, Demetris Christofias, proposed that Turkey hand over Varosha to the UN in return for the Republic of Cyprus opening the port of Famagusta to commercial transactions with the EU.2 In 2012 there were reports that Turkey was considering allowing the former residents of Famagusta to return, but keeping the city under TRNC administration, if the Cyprus peace talks did not reach a conclusion by 1 July 2012 when Cyprus took over the EU presidency.3 The Turkish proposal did not materialise. Greek Cypriots would consider it a breach of UN Security Council resolutions on Famagusta which call for the area to be transferred to the UN. 1 Commons Library Standard Note 5208, 4 November 2009 2 “Famagusta becomes key to Cyprus reunification”, EurActiv, 12 October 2010 3 “Famagusta mayor calls on president to take action”, Cyprus Mail, 12 April 2012 Number 7387, 16 November 2015 6 2. Cyprus settlement negotiations Since the Greek Cypriots rejected the ‘Annan Plan’ for a permanent settlement in 2004, negotiations have sputtered along with limited progress. 2.1 UN negotiations The negotiations are facilitated by the UN’s special adviser on Cyprus, Espen Barth Eide. The talks are based on the agreed formula of a unified State of Cyprus with a single sovereignty, single international personality and a single citizenship, in a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with political equality, as described in a series of UN Security Council resolutions. The problematic issues include: • Power-sharing: in general, Greek Cypriots want to keep as much power as possible with the federal government and ensure that the new state is a continuation of the Republic of Cyprus, whereas Turkish Cypriots want to keep as much power as possible within the two ‘constituent states’ and ensure that their own entity is treated as an equal founder.4 • Security: the status of Turkish troops and of the 1960 Treaty of Guarantee. • Residence and citizenship rights of settlers from mainland Turkey. • Property issues: there are thousands of claims to ownership of properties from people displaced during the events of 1974. Recent developments The election in April 2015 of Mustafa Akinci, a centre-left moderate, as president of the unrecognised TRNC rekindled optimism over the talks: The recent election of Mustafa Akinci as Turkish Cypriot leader is widely seen as a game-changer - one that has significantly increased the chances of finding a solution. His first act on assuming office was to abolish the "entry visa" for visitors to northern Cyprus - something that had long angered Greek Cypriots. For the first time since Greek Cypriots rejected the UN's 2004 reunification plan, the communities now have leaders with both the will and political acumen necessary to reach a solution.5 In May 2015 the UN special adviser, Espen Barth Eide, announced that the restarted comprehensive settlement negotiations between Mr Akinci and the Greek Cypriot President Nikos Anastasiades had yielded their first tangible results, with decisions to open new crossings and interconnecting electricity grids on the island. Negotiations are currently 4 International Crisis Group, Cyprus: Reunification or Partition?, Europe Report N°201, 30 September 2009, p4 5 ‘Cyprus peace talks: Rocky road to reunification’, BBC news online, 16 June 2015 7 Famagusta debate in an ‘intensive’ phase, with six meetings between the leaders scheduled for November and almost daily meetings between the negotiating teams.6 In October 2015 the Cyprus Government – which continues to oppose reopening EU membership talks with Turkey7 – said it could remove its veto on Turkish EU accession if Famagusta was returned. It had the support of Germany’s leader, Chancellor Angela Merkel, who met Turkish Prime Minister Davutoglu in an attempt to secure Ankara’s support in stemming the migrant influx into the EU. Davutoglu was reported as describing the moves to foster collaboration between the EU and Ankara as a “better approach”.8 In mid-November 2015 the Greek Prime Minister, Alexis Tsipras, said it was clear the EU's salvation lay with Turkey.
Recommended publications
  • Dual Naming of Sea Areas in Modern Atlases and Implications for the East Sea/Sea of Japan Case
    Dual naming of sea areas in modern atlases and implications for the East Sea/Sea of Japan case Rainer DORMELS* Dual naming is, to varying extents, present in nearly all atlases. The empirical research in this paper deals with the dual naming of sea areas in about 20 atlases from different nations in the years from 2006 to 2017. Objective, quality, and size of the atlases and the country where the atlases originated from play a key role. All these characteristics of the atlases will be taken into account in the paper. In the cases of dual naming of sea areas, we can, in general, differentiate between: cases where both names are exonyms, cases where both names are endonyms, and cases where one name is an endonym, while the other is an exonym. The goal of this paper is to suggest a typology of dual names of sea areas in different atlases. As it turns out, dual names of sea areas in atlases have different functions, and in many atlases, dual naming is not a singular exception. Dual naming may help the users of atlases to orientate themselves better. Additionally, dual naming allows for providing valuable information to the users. Regarding the naming of the sea between Korea and Japan present study has achieved the following results: the East Sea/Sea of Japan is the sea area, which by far showed the most use of dual naming in the atlases examined, in all cases of dual naming two exonyms were used, even in atlases, which allow dual naming just in very few cases, the East Sea/Sea of Japan is presented with dual naming.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyprus Tourism Organisation Offices 108 - 112
    CYPRUS 10000 years of history and civilisation CONTENTS CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 CYPRUS 10000 years of history and civilisation 6 THE HISTORY OF CYPRUS 8200 - 1050 BC Prehistoric Age 7 1050 - 480 BC Historic Times: Geometric and Archaic Periods 8 480 BC - 330 AD Classical, Hellenistic and Roman Periods 9 330 - 1191 AD Byzantine Period 10 - 11 1192 - 1489 AD Frankish Period 12 1489 - 1571 AD The Venetians in Cyprus 13 1571 - 1878 AD Cyprus becomes part of the Ottoman Empire 14 1878 - 1960 AD British rule 15 1960 - today The Cyprus Republic, the Turkish invasion, 16 European Union entry LEFKOSIA (NICOSIA) 17 - 36 LEMESOS (LIMASSOL) 37 - 54 LARNAKA 55 - 68 PAFOS 69 - 84 AMMOCHOSTOS (FAMAGUSTA) 85 - 90 TROODOS 91 - 103 ROUTES Byzantine route, Aphrodite Cultural Route 104 - 105 MAP OF CYPRUS 106 - 107 CYPRUS TOURISM ORGANISATION OFFICES 108 - 112 3 LEFKOSIA - NICOSIA LEMESOS - LIMASSOL LARNAKA PAFOS AMMOCHOSTOS - FAMAGUSTA TROODOS 4 INTRODUCTION Cyprus is a small country with a long history and a rich culture. It is not surprising that UNESCO included the Pafos antiquities, Choirokoitia and ten of the Byzantine period churches of Troodos in its list of World Heritage Sites. The aim of this publication is to help visitors discover the cultural heritage of Cyprus. The qualified personnel at any Information Office of the Cyprus Tourism Organisation (CTO) is happy to help organise your visit in the best possible way. Parallel to answering questions and enquiries, the Cyprus Tourism Organisation provides, free of charge, a wide range of publications, maps and other information material. Additional information is available at the CTO website: www.visitcyprus.com It is an unfortunate reality that a large part of the island’s cultural heritage has since July 1974 been under Turkish occupation.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Memorandum Ownership Status of Hotels and Other
    MEMORANDUM OWNERSHIP STATUS OF HOTELS AND OTHER ACCOMODATION FACILITIES IN THE OCCUPIED PART OF THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Cyprus hereby publishes a list1 of hotels situated in the Turkish occupied part of Cyprus. The majority of these hotels belong to Greek Cypriot displaced persons who were forced to leave their properties following the Turkish invasion of 1974 or have been built illegally on properties belonging to displaced Greek Cypriots, in violation of the latter’s property rights and without their consent. A number of hotels belong to Turkish Cypriots or have been built on land belonging to Turkish Cypriots. The European Court of Human Rights, in its Judgment of 18 December 1996, on the individual application of the Greek Cypriot displaced owner from Kyrenia, Mrs. Titina Loizidou, against Turkey, and in the Fourth Interstate Application of Cyprus against Turkey of 10 May 2001, upheld the rights of the refugees to their properties. In the Loizidou case, the Court ordered the Government of Turkey to compensate the applicant for the time period of deprivation of use of her property and to provide full access and allow peaceful enjoyment of her property in Kyrenia. The right of the displaced owners to their properties was reconfirmed in the decision of the European Court of Human Rights (Dec. 2005) regarding the application of Myra Xenides- Arestis v. Turkey, and has since been repeatedly reconfirmed in a multitude of cases brought by Greek Cypriot owners of property in the occupied part of Cyprus against Turkey]. It should also be reminded that, according to the United Nations Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons (the Pinheiro principles) “all refugees and displaced persons have the right to have restored to them any housing, land or property of which they were arbitrarily or unlawfully deprived..”.
    [Show full text]
  • Agia Napa Monastery
    Agia Napa Monastery 1 The monastery of Agia Napa and its namesake village are located in the Famagusta district, in southeast Cyprus. The name Napa derives from the ancient Greek word “Napi”, which means wooded valley or canyon. The word is mentioned in Homer’s Iliad, in Pindar’s Pythian Odes, and later in the Christian hymnology. In the past, there was lush vegetation in that part of the Famagusta district, whereas in the area where the village and monastery exist today there used to be an idyllic wooded valley with springs. In ancient times there was a Greek city named Thronoi in that valley, and a temple dedicated to Aphrodite. With the advent of Christianity, the city declined and all that remained eventually was ruins. However, the valley with its dense forest and plentiful water supply became popular with hunters, who converged here in search of game. When the miraculous icon of Virgin Mary was found, the word spread quickly to the neighbouring villages and the cave in that remote valley became a shrine and a sacred pilgrimage for the Orthodox Christians of the area. That icon was named “The Icon of Agia Napa”, i.e. the icon of Virgin Mary of the Forest, and the shrine was named “Agia Napa”. The area around the Monastery was uninhabited until 1790, when a group of people arrived there, having fled Thessaloniki because of an outbreak of cholera. Of that group, only Nicholas Kemitzis and his son survived. The son later married a Cypriot girl from the village of Panagia, located in the hills north of the monastery, where the water of Agia Napa flows from.
    [Show full text]
  • “Borders/ Debordering”
    “BORDERS/ DEBORDERING” number 83/84 • volume 21, 2016 EDITED BY HELENA MOTOH MAJA BJELICA POLIGRAFI Editor-in-Chief: Helena Motoh (Univ. of Primorska) Editorial Board: Lenart Škof (Univ. of Primorska), Igor Škamperle (Univ. of Ljubljana), Mojca Terčelj (Univ. of Primorska), Miha Pintarič (Univ. of Ljubljana), Rok Svetlič (Univ. of Primorska), Anja Zalta (Univ. of Ljubljana) Editorial Office: University of Primorska, Science and Research Centre, Institute for Philosophical Studies, Garibaldijeva 1, SI-6000 Koper, Slovenia Phone: +386 5 6637 700, Fax: + 386 5 6637 710, E-mail: [email protected] http://www.poligrafi.si number 83/84, volume 21 (2016) “BORDERS/DEBORDERING” TOWARDS A NEW WORLD CULTURE OF HOSPITALITY Edited by Helena Motoh and Maja Bjelica International Editorial Board: Th. Luckmann (Universität Konstanz), D. Kleinberg-Levin (Northwestern University), R. A. Mall (Universität München), M. Ježić (Filozofski fakultet, Zagreb), D. Louw (University of the Free State, Bloemfontain), M. Volf (Yale University), K. Wiredu (University of South Florida), D. Thomas (University of Birmingham), M. Kerševan (Filozofska fakulteta, Ljubljana), F. Leoncini (Università degli Studi di Venezia), P. Zovatto (Università di Trieste), T. Garfitt (Oxford University), M. Zink (Collège de France), L. Olivé (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México), A. Louth (Durham University), P. Imbert (University of Ottawa), Ö. Turan (Middle-East Technical University, Ankara), E. Krotz (Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán / Universidad Autónoma de Metropolitana-Iztapalapa),
    [Show full text]
  • FOURTH SECTION CASE of LORDOS and OTHERS V
    FOURTH SECTION CASE OF LORDOS AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (Application no. 15973/90) JUDGMENT (merits) STRASBOURG 2 November 2010 FINAL 11/04/2011 This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 (c) of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. LORDOS AND OTHERS v. TURKEY JUDGMENT (MERITS) 1 In the case of Lordos and Others v. Turkey, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Nicolas Bratza, President, Lech Garlicki, Ljiljana Mijović, David Thór Björgvinsson, Ján Šikuta, Päivi Hirvelä, Işıl Karakaş, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 5 October 2010, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in an application (no. 15973/90) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by thirteen Cypriot nationals, Mr Constantinos G. Lordos, Mr Kikis L. Christofides, Mr Zacharias Spiridonos, Mr Stavros Ioannou, Mr Areti G. Ionides, Mr Michalis Evangelides, Mr Loizos D. Loizides, Mr Christos Hadjimanolis, Mr Panayiotis Sergis, Mr Georgios Misirlis, Mr Georgios Rouvas, Mrs Eleni (alias Lenia) Antoniadou and Mr Stelios Mandrides (“the applicants”), on 20 December 1989. 2. The applicants were represented by Mr A. Demetriades, a lawyer practising in Nicosia. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Z.M. Necatigil. 3. The applicants alleged, in particular, that the Turkish occupation of the northern part of Cyprus had deprived them of their homes and properties and that they had been the victims of discrimination on grounds of their ethnic origin and religious beliefs.
    [Show full text]
  • 693 No. 743. the EXCHANGE CONTROL LAWS, 1952 and 1954
    693 No. 743. THE EXCHANGE CONTROL LAWS, 1952 AND 1954. ORDER MADE BY THE FINANCIAL SECRETARY UNDER SECTION 2 (I). In exercise of the powers vested in me by section 2 (1) of the Exchange Control Laws, 1952 and 1954 (hereinafter referred to as " the Laws "), I, the Financial Secretary, hereby order as follows :— .1. This Order may be cited as the Exchange Control (Authorized Dealers) Order, 1954. · .-...- 2. The persons specified in the Schedule hereto are hereby authorized to act for the purposes of the Laws as authorized dealers in relation to gold and foreign currency. 3. The Exchange Control (Authorized Dealers) Order, 1953, is hereby Gazette: revoked. ' Suppl. No 18.9.1953. SCHEDULE. The Ottoman Bank. Barclays Bank D.C.O. The Ionian Bank Limited. The Bank of Cyprus Limited. The Popular Bank of Limassol Limited. National Bank of Greece and Athens. The Turkish Bank of Nicosia Limited. Turkiye Is, Bankasi A.§. Made this 28th day of December, 1954. A. F. BATES, (M.P. 1100/5 I/M.) Financial Secretary'. ? EXPLANATORY NOTE. ■■, {This Note is not part of the Order, but is intended to indicate its , general purport). Ρ This Order lists the banks authorized to deal in g9ld and foreign currency and differs from the previous Order in that Turkiye ί§ Bankasi A.§. has been added to the Schedule of the Order. No. 744. THE TREE PLANTING (VILLAGE AREAS) LAW. CAP. 175. NOTIFICATION MADE UNDER SECTION 17. Lefkoniko (Famagusta) Fund. In exercise of the powers vested in me by section 17 of the Tree Planting (Village Areas) Law, I hereby establish a fund for the village of Lefkoniko in the District of Famagusta (hereinafter called the " Fund") into which shall be paid all fines recovered under the said Law for offences committed within the Tree Planting Area of the village of Lefkoniko as described in the Order of the Commissioner of Famagusta published in Supplement No.
    [Show full text]
  • S/5764 English Page 2
    ORIGN?L: ENGIXSH REPORT BY THE SECRETARY-GENER;\L'IO m SECURITY COUNCIL ON THE UNITED NATIONS OPERATION IN CYPRUS, FOR THE PERIOD 26 APRIL To 8 JUNE 1964 INTRODUCTION 1. In accordance with the resolution of the Security Council of 4 March 1964 (S/5575), the United Nations Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus was assembled and placed under the command of Lt. General P.S. Gyani of India. After an initial period devoted to deployrcent, the Force became operational on 27 March 1964. The Security Council resolution states that it is the task of the Force, in the interest of international peace and security, (a) to prevent a recurrence of fighting; (b) to contribute to the maintenance and restoration of 1s.w and order; (c) to contribute to a return to norEal conditions. 2. On 11 Muy 1964, Mr. &do Plaza of Ecuador was appointed by the Secretary- General as his Special Representative in Cyprus to conduct discussiol!s and negotiations with the parties concernad towards achieving the objectives of UNFICYPrs mandate as outline& in paragraph 4 of the Secretary-General*s Report to the Security Council on 29 Jippril 1964. 3. The present report covers the period from 26 .!pril 1964 to 9 June 1964. Cn some occasions, and in order to present a more comprehensive ad clear picture, some actions during all the period of UIKFICYP*s presence in Cyprus are reported. The report comprises the following sections: I. Military Situation II. Political :$spects III. Economic, Social and Judiciary dspects IV. UNFIcYP's Progranae of Action (as set fort11 in paragraph 3 of annex I of Security Council document S/5671) V.
    [Show full text]
  • (Helsinki Commission) on “Cyprus' Religiou
    Briefing to the United States Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe (Helsinki Commission) on “Cyprus’ Religious Cultural Heritage in Peril” (July 21, 2009) By Dr. Klaus Gallas Historian, Byzantine Art and Architecture I would like to thank the members of the Commission for allowing me to testify before you on the issue of Cyprus’ religious cultural heritage in peril. “There is still no complete case by case documentation of the art thefts that have been growing catastrophically in both number and seriousness ever since the start of the Turkish occupation of northern Cyprus. But there is no question that since the day of the invasion, July 20th 1974, such internationally organised thefts and the accompanying illegal trade in works of art plundered from churches in the Turkish occupied sector – some of which form part of the UNESCO World Cultural Heritage – have multiplied to a worrying extent”. One shocking instance that typifies this plundering and illegal trading is the 'Dikmen case', the most spectacular example of international theft recorded by the LKA, the Bavarian central department of crime. It culminated in a court case in Indianapolis in 1989 against the American art dealer Peggy Goldberg which was successfully pursued by the Church of Cyprus and the Government of Cyprus. It concerned the 6th Century mosaics in the apsis of the Panagia Kanakariá church on the Karpassia peninsula. Parts of these are now in the Byzantine Museum in Nicosia. Probably the first major account of the barbaric desecration and destruction of Christian heritage within the Turkish occupied area was the one by myself that appeared in the German national newspaper, the Frankfurter Allgemeine, on March 30th 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Famagusta (Gazimağusa) & the Karpas Peninsula
    ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd Famagusta (Gazimağusa) & the Karpas Peninsula Includes ¨ Why Go? Famagusta The thin finger of the Karpas Peninsula (Karpasia in Greek; (Gazimağusa) ........... 207 Karpaz in Turkish) is all rolling meadows, craggy cliffs and Ancient Salamis ......... 217 wild beaches with a handful of snoozy villages thrown in. Karpas Peninsula ....... 221 It’s a taste of old-style Cyprus that can’t be beaten. Despite Yenierenköy new roads and development, its agrarian soul still feels un- (Yiallousa) ................. 223 touched by modern life. Sipahi (Agia Triada).... 223 When you’ve recharged your batteries with the Karpas’ serene wilderness, turn back west to visit Ancient Salamis. Dipkarpaz This enigmatic window into the Hellenic world is the is- (Rizokarpaso) ............224 land’s most impressive archaeological site. Agios Filon Just to the south is the fortified city of Famagusta where & Afendrika ............... 224 you can climb the ramparts to walk the city walls. The city’s faded long-lost grandeur can be found in lanes filled with gently dilapidated houses that sit beside crumbling ruins of once-majestic churches. Best Places Brimming with history and full of mesmerising natural to Eat beauty, this is by far the island’s most rewarding region to ¨ Othello’s Meyhanesi (p215) explore. ¨ Alevkayalı Restaurant (p223) When to Go ¨ Kiyi (p220) ¨ Wild orchids and flowers bloom on the Karpas Peninsula ¨ Oasis Restaurant (p224) and bird life can be spotted from March to May. ¨ Aspava Restaurant (p215) ¨ The International Famagusta Art & Culture Festival in July features performances amid the ruins of Salamis. ¨ Green and loggerhead turtles nest and hatch eggs on Best Reminders Karpas’ wild beaches in August and September.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyprus and the Medieval Mediterranean: an Island and Its Monuments Spring 2018 Monday and Wednesday 2:00-3:15 MHRA 1304
    Religious Studies 503/ History 514: Cyprus and the Medieval Mediterranean: An Island and Its Monuments Spring 2018 Monday and Wednesday 2:00-3:15 MHRA 1304 Asa Eger, Associate Professor Department of History Office: MHRA 2113 Office Hours: MW 3:30-4:30 Phone: 336 334 5203 Email: [email protected] Derek Krueger, Joe Rosenthal Excellence Professor Department of Religious Studies and Program in Women’s and Gender Studies Office: 109 Foust Building Office Hours: Mondays starting at 3:15 E-mail: [email protected] COURSE DESCRIPTION This course introduces students to the religious and cultural history of Cyprus from Late Antiquity to the Ottoman periods through its topography and monuments. The course teaches students to integrate material evidence with primary and secondary source texts to understand the religious and cultural history of one of the world’s cultural crossroads. Students will appreciate the stamp of religious life on the topography of the island and the island’s role in the Mediterranean world. The course includes a field trip to Cyprus over Spring Break that is required of all students. This course is designed for upper-level undergraduate History or Religious Studies majors and for Graduate students and others with a strong interest in the history of Late Antique and medieval eastern Mediterranean and/or the history of Christianity and Islam. Class will be run as a seminar discussion with everyone expected to contribute to our common task of interpreting and applying the assigned texts. Reading assignments will average 100-150 pages per week. Students should expect to spend 6 hours a week preparing for class meetings and 2.5 hours in class each week, for an average of 8.5 hours per week.
    [Show full text]
  • Akanthou*/Tatlisu Rescue Excavation
    Anadolu / Anatolia 30, 2006 M. Şevketoğlu CYPRO-ANATOLIAN RELATIONS IN THE 9TH MILLENIUM BC: AKANTHOU*/TATLISU RESCUE EXCAVATION Müge ŞEVKETOĞLU Keywords: Cyprus, Anatolia, Aceramic, Neolithic, Obsidian Anathtar Kelimeler: Kıbrıs, Anadolu, Akeramik, Neolitik, Obsidyen Abstract In the last decade archaeological research has resulted in advances to our knowledge of Cypriot Prehistory. The results of recent excavations particularly corroded the thoughts and theories of the 1930’s. The former description of Cypro – Anatolian relations as a ‘slight possibility’ is no longer tenable. Two important sites which have played a role in this change are Parekklisha-Shillourokambos and Akanthou-Arkosykos (Tatlısu-Çiftlikdüzü) (Fig. 1). Both sites have exclusive discoveries: they are the first two sites where cattle bones and, more importantly, a large number of obsidian blades were found alongside particular styles of picrolite artefacts (Fig. 2). The geographical position of Akanthou/Tatlısu, the site with the largest number of obsidian blades so far discovered in Cyprus, on the northern coast proves to have played a very important role in Cypro-Anatolian relations during the 9th millennium BC. Prehistoric Archaeology in Cyprus excavations; the Enkomi Late Bronze Age tombs; the Nitovikla fortress; and The first scientific archaeological the Lapithos Bronze Age cemetery. The excavations to push the island’s historical Swedish Cyprus Expedition members, past back before the Archaic Greeks to the first to investigate a Neolithic site on the Neolithic period, were carried out by Cyprus, excavated two important Einar Gjerstad, the leader of the Swedish Neolithic settlements. One of these sites Cyprus Expedition in Cyprus between is located off the western end of the 1927-1931.
    [Show full text]