DOCSLIB.ORG

Abel on Dawson, 'Waterloo: the Truth at Last. Why Napoleon Lost the Great Battle'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Abel on Dawson, 'Waterloo: the Truth at Last. Why Napoleon Lost the Great Battle' H-War Abel on Dawson, 'Waterloo: The Truth at Last. Why Napoleon Lost the Great Battle' Review published on Saturday, June 2, 2018 Paul L. Dawson. Waterloo: The Truth at Last. Why Napoleon Lost the Great Battle. Barnsley: Frontline Books, 2017. 547 pp. $39.95 (cloth), ISBN 978-1-5267-0245-6. Reviewed by Jonathan Abel (Command and General Staff College, Ft. Leavenworth) Published on H-War (June, 2018) Commissioned by Margaret Sankey (Air War College) Printable Version: http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=51957 Paul L. Dawson’s provocatively titled Waterloo: The Truth at Last: Why Napoleon lost the Great Battle seeks to provide a new narrative of the event and to weigh in on the many historiographical controversies, large and small, that continue to roil the field of Waterloo studies. This builds on Dawson’s previous works, including Napoleon and Grouchy (2017) and Marshal Ney at Quatre Bras (2017), completing a trilogy. Dawson’s approach relies on primary-source documents and archival material to craft his argument, especially muster rolls and casualty reports from the latter. The resulting work falls somewhere between a data book and a narrative, providing valuable statistical information to the specialist while attempting to entice the generalist with novel arguments and conclusions. Dawson’s stated purpose is to demonstrate that “despite a plethora of books on the subject, the hard strategic reality is that Hougoumont and La Haye Sainte were sideshows compared to the French and Prussian combats at Plancenoit and Papelotte” (p. ix). He thus dedicates much of the work to the gritty urban combat around the villages of Papelotte and Frischermont as the French, British, and Prussian armies traded possession of them. These chapters illuminate his main thesis, that the battle- deciding action took place on the French right with the Prussians and only a portion of the British forces. He concludes with the oft-repeated argument that the failures of Marshal Emmanuel, marquis de Grouchy, to contain the Prussians provide a major explanation for the French defeat. A secondary theme of Waterloo: The Truth at Last, as the name suggests, is contributing to historiographical debates of the much-analyzed battle. The chapter “Legros, Bouche, or Bonnet” debates the identity of the French soldier, perhaps mythical, who smashed the gates at Hougoumont. Similarly, a portion of “Defeat” analyzes the role of General Pierre Cambronne and his infamous mot. These arguments, as well as the time-worn debates over the competencies of Grouchy; Jean-Baptiste Drouet, comte d’Erlon; Marshal Michel Ney; General Honoré Reille; and Napoleon himself are likely unavoidable in any work on Waterloo, and Dawson’s opinions continue to stoke their historiographical fires. Ostensibly, Waterloo’s strength lies in its sourcing. Dawson relies on the printed sources for much of his narrative, including extensive block quotes throughout. His mastery of casualty reports and figures occupies the remainder of the book, often in bulleted lists or charts detailing the minute facts of individual engagements, drawn from French archives. This portion forms the most valuable Citation: H-Net Reviews. Abel on Dawson, 'Waterloo: The Truth at Last. Why Napoleon Lost the Great Battle'. H-War. 06-19-2018. https://networks.h-net.org/node/12840/reviews/1887229/abel-dawson-waterloo-truth-last-why-napoleon-lost-great-battle Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-War contribution of the work to larger historiography. He argues that casualty figures illustrate the pace of the action and illuminate many historiographical debates, for example going so far as to state that “in order to assess the battlefield performance of the 6th Corps at Waterloo, we turn to the total losses sustained” (p. 334). However, Dawson’s sourcing fails in other areas. For example, he includes block quotes from both Lord Castlereagh and Sir Francis Burdett in his introduction, yet his citations are not from the works of either man, but rather from the author’s own lecture presented in 2015 (pp. 2-3). In addition, many footnotes cite “personal communication,” including citations of data, rather than archival material (pp. 35, 52, 70, 117, 119, 141, 151, 305, 309, 311). Perhaps most significantly, Dawson does not appear to have consulted German-language sources, nor mined German archives for source material, a necessity in a work focused on the Prussian role in the battle. As Waterloo is likely the most examined Napoleonic battle in Anglophone literature and historiography, the ultimate measure of a book on the great battle is its novelty in a field crowded by thousands of similar works. Dawson attempts to locate his work via the use of casualty figures in his narrative, which does represent a fairly novel approach. However, the reader is struck by the similarity of Dawson’s work to a data book. As noted, large sections of his narrative consist of tables of casualty figures, bulleted lists of casualty descriptions, and vignettes drawn from muster rolls. Dawson contends that these records “have never before appeared in print” (p. 448). However, the bulk of the statistics, at least as aggregated in tables, appear in works like Digby Smith’sThe Greenhill Napoleonic Wars Data Book (1998). Perhaps Dawson intends to say that his figures do not appear, as a whole or in quasi-narrative form, in print, but the distinction is lost in the stridency of his arguments. Dawson is at his best when he combines his deep examination of archival muster rolls and casualty tables with firsthand accounts of Waterloo. In doing so, he provides valuable arguments about the tactical engagements that composed the battle, particularly in addressing many small myths that have accreted over the centuries since. However, it does not rise above the level of its own argumentation. Dawson sets out to provide a unique and novel work that uses casualty figures and muster rolls to show the importance of the Prussian contribution to Waterloo. While Dawson may have technically achieved this in a single volume, other works have trod the same ground. To provide one example, much of Peter Hofschroer’s career has been dedicated to illuminating the Prussian role in the battle, in contrast to William Siborne and others. Statistical studies like the aforementioned work by Smith provide many of the same casualty figures on which Dawson positions his thesis. His conclusion, that Napoleon lost the battle through his own incompetence and that of his subordinates, is hardly novel to the field either. This leaves Dawson’s Waterloo in an awkward historiographical position, and its audience seems nebulous. His reliance on block quotes from memoirs, despite his stated reservations about them, makes for a choppy narrative, particularly for readers put off by long quotations. A reader not familiar with the battle, its tactical details, and especially the historiographical debates major and minor that surround it, will quickly become lost in Dawson’s prose. Therefore, the casual reader would not pick up Dawson’s work as an introduction or clear narrative of the battle. A specialist, hobbyist, or historian seeking data and statistical analysis might do just as well with Smith’s work or a similar one, or even blogs dedicated to archiving such material. However, his historiographical debates will be welcomed by an audience always eager to rehash the great battle. Ultimately, Dawson must be credited with bringing casualty statistics into a quasi-narrative single volume, which Citation: H-Net Reviews. Abel on Dawson, 'Waterloo: The Truth at Last. Why Napoleon Lost the Great Battle'. H-War. 06-19-2018. https://networks.h-net.org/node/12840/reviews/1887229/abel-dawson-waterloo-truth-last-why-napoleon-lost-great-battle Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2 H-War provides the utility of Waterloo: The Truth at Last—it serves as an imperfect bridge from the casual reader of militaria to the more dedicated specialist works that already fill a very crowded historiographical field. Citation: Jonathan Abel. Review of Dawson, Paul L., Waterloo: The Truth at Last. Why Napoleon Lost the Great Battle. H-War, H-Net Reviews. June, URL:2018. http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=51957 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Citation: H-Net Reviews. Abel on Dawson, 'Waterloo: The Truth at Last. Why Napoleon Lost the Great Battle'. H-War. 06-19-2018. https://networks.h-net.org/node/12840/reviews/1887229/abel-dawson-waterloo-truth-last-why-napoleon-lost-great-battle Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Waterloo in Myth and Memory: the Battles of Waterloo 1815-1915 Timothy Fitzpatrick
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2013 Waterloo in Myth and Memory: The Battles of Waterloo 1815-1915 Timothy Fitzpatrick Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES WATERLOO IN MYTH AND MEMORY: THE BATTLES OF WATERLOO 1815-1915 By TIMOTHY FITZPATRICK A Dissertation submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2013 Timothy Fitzpatrick defended this dissertation on November 6, 2013. The members of the supervisory committee were: Rafe Blaufarb Professor Directing Dissertation Amiée Boutin University Representative James P. Jones Committee Member Michael Creswell Committee Member Jonathan Grant Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii For my Family iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Drs. Rafe Blaufarb, Aimée Boutin, Michael Creswell, Jonathan Grant and James P. Jones for being on my committee. They have been wonderful mentors during my time at Florida State University. I would also like to thank Dr. Donald Howard for bringing me to FSU. Without Dr. Blaufarb’s and Dr. Horward’s help this project would not have been possible. Dr. Ben Wieder supported my research through various scholarships and grants. I would like to thank The Institute on Napoleon and French Revolution professors, students and alumni for our discussions, interaction and support of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Questionnaire NANTES Quel Est Le Fleuv
    Nom : ……………………………………. Questionnaire NANTES Quel est le fleuve qui passe à Nantes ? …………………………………………………………………..………… Combien d’habitants vivent dans l’agglomération nantaise ? ……………………………………………………………………………… Comment s’appelle le maire de Nantes ? …………………………………………………………………………….. Le maire de Nantes Quel est le nom de la rue commerçante (chic) de Nantes ? ………………………………………………………… Comment s’appelle le théâtre ? ……………………………………………………….. ç Comment s’appelle ce passage ? ………………………………………………………. Comment s’appellent les vélos de location ? ☐ vélib ☐ bicloo ☐ vélov Selon une légende très populaire, le commandant français Pierre Cambronne, à la bataille de Waterloo en 1815, est sommé de se rendre par le général britannique Colville, Cambronne lui aurait répondu : « La garde meurt mais ne se rend pas ! » Puis, devant l'insistance du Britannique, il aurait eu une réponse plus directe, aujourd'hui connue comme le « mot de Cambronne ». Il lui aurait dit : ……………………………..…… Quelle célèbre marque de biscuits a eu son usine principale dans le centre ville de Nantes ? ……………………………………………………………. Pourquoi cette marque porte ce nom ? ……………………………………………………………. Quel célèbre vin blanc est produit dans la région nantaise ? ☐ le pinot ☐ le sancerre ☐ le muscadet Une de ces images n’est pas une œuvre de Le Corbusier. Laquelle ? (Barrer l’intrus) Villa Savoye Fauteuil Chaise longue Gherkin Cité radieuse (Poissy) LC2 à bascule LC4 (Londres) (Marseille) Retrouve dans la liste le mot qui correspond à chaque image et recopie le sous l’image. MASCARON BERLINGOT NANTAIS FAR BRETON MACARON La chanteuse Barbara connue notamment pour l’Aigle Noir a écrit une autre chanson très célèbre dont le titre est Nantes. Dans cette chanson elle parle d’une rue de Nantes (rue de la grange au loup). Cette rue n’existait pas à l’origine.
    [Show full text]
  • Lettres & Manuscrits Autographes
    ALDE ALDE Lettres & Manuscrits autographes Manuscrits autographes & Lettres www.alde.fr 69 vendredi 24 juin 2011 Couv. Alde 24 juin.indd 1 01/06/11 13:30 AUTOGRAPHES DIVERS nos 1 à 129 RÉVOLUTION ET EMPIRE nos 130 à 310 Expert Thierry Bodin Syndicat français des experts professionnels en œuvres d’art Les Autographes 45, rue de l’Abbé Grégoire 75006 Paris Tél. 01 45 48 25 31 - Facs 01 45 48 92 67 [email protected] Exposition privée chez l'expert Uniquement sur rendez-vous préalable Exposition publique Hôtel Regina Vendredi 24 juin de 10 h à midi Couv. Alde 24 juin.indd 2 01/06/11 13:30 MaisonALDE de ventes spécialisée Livres & Autographes Lettres & Manuscrits autographes Vente aux enchères publiques Le vendredi 24 juin 2011 à 14 h 45 Hôtel Regina Salon de Flore 2, place des Pyramides 75001 Paris Tél. : 01 42 60 31 10 Commissaire-priseur Jérôme Delcamp Expert Thierry Bodin Syndicat français des experts professionnels en œuvres d’art Les Autographes 45, rue de l’Abbé Grégoire 75006 Paris Tél. 01 45 48 25 31 - Facs 01 45 48 92 67 [email protected] EALDE Maison de ventes aux enchères 1, rue de Fleurus 75006 Paris Tél. 01 45 49 09 24 - Facs. 01 45 49 09 30 - www.alde.fr Agrément n°-2006-583 9 Abréviations : L.A.S. ou P.A.S. lettre ou pièce autographe signée L.S. ou P.S. lettre ou pièce signée (texte d’une autre main ou dactylographié) L.A. ou P.A. lettre ou pièce autographe non signée BB A.
    [Show full text]
  • Litteraria Pragensia
    RENÉ-MARTIN PILLET: A FRENCH REPUBLICAN’S JAUNDICED VIEW OF BRITAIN? Richard Tholoniat René-Martin Pillet (1762-1815) found fame (and notoriety) with his description of the plight of the anonymous many on board English prison ships. His account of his captivity (and indirectly of previous stays in Britain) was published at the end of an eventful life: a trained lawyer, a follower of La Fayette, which eventually branded him an émigré to French authorities, he travelled to America where he became a citizen of the new republic; an officer in the armies of the Consulate and Empire, he fought from Guadeloupe to Portugal where he became a prisoner of the English. His social and geographical mobility highlights the problematic status of émigré and prisoner in the context of social and political upheavals in France and Britain brought about by the French Revolution and the turmoil of the Napoleonic wars. His book L’Angleterre vue à Londres et dans ses provinces pendant un séjour de dix années, dont six comme prisonnier de guerre (1815), a powerful indictment of French Anglomania, nevertheless provides perceptive observations on British institutions and manners. At the same time his Anglophobic remarks contribute pieces to the puzzle Pierre Reboul called “le mythe anglaise,” pieces Byron helped fit together. When it comes to examining French writing of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, emprisonnés should be added to the triad exilés, émigrés and expatriés. Indeed, Sylvain Venayre has made the point that it was armies on the move across Europe that gave rise to the medical concept of nostalgia,1 a concept more typically associated, for students of literature, with the many Romantic writers who explored themes of exile and imprisonment, the ultimate symbol 1 Sylvain Venayre, Panorama du voyage 1780-1920 (Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2012) 306.
    [Show full text]
  • Hobhouse and the Hundred Days
    116 The Hundred Days, March 11th-July 24th 1815 The Hundred Days March 11th-July 24th 1815 Edited from B.L.Add.Mss. 47232, and Berg Collection Volumes 2, 3 and 4: Broughton Holograph Diaries, Henry W. and Albert A. Berg Collection, The New York Public Library, Astor, Lenox and Tilden Foundations. Saturday March 11th 1815: Received this morning from my father the following letter: Lord Cochrane has escaped from prison1 – Bounaparte has escaped from Elba2 – I write this from the House of Commons and the intelligence in both cases seems to rest on good authority and is believed. Benjamin Hobhouse Both are certainly true. Cullen3 came down today and confirmed the whole of both. From the first I feel sure of Napoleon’s success. I received a letter [from] Lord John Townshend4 apologising for his rudeness, but annexing such comments as require a hint from me at the close of the controversy. Sunday March 12th 1815: Finish reading the Αυτοχεδιοι Ετοχασµοι of Coray.5 1: Thomas Cochrane, 10th Earl of Dundonald (1775-1860) admiral. Implicated unfairly in a financial scandal, he had been imprisoned by the establishment enemies he had made in his exposure of Admiralty corruption. He was recaptured (see below, 21 Mar 1815). He later became famous as the friend and naval assistant of Simon Bolivar. 2: Napoleon left Elba on March 26th. 3: Cullen was a lawyer friend of H., at Lincoln’s Inn. 4: Lord John Townshend. (1757-1833); H. has been planning to compete against his son as M.P. for Cambridge University, which has made discord for which Townshend has apologised.
    [Show full text]
  • Lettres Et Manuscrits Autographes Lettres Et Manuscrits Autographes Lettres Et Manuscrits
    13 AVRIL 2011 13 AVRIL LETTRES ET MANUSCRITS AUTOGRAPHES LETTRES ET MANUSCRITS AUTOGRAPHES LETTRES ET MANUSCRITS Alexis VELLIET Henri-Pierre TEISSEDRE Delphine de COURTRY Commissaires-priseurs EXPERT : Thierry BODIN 5 rue Drouot 75009 Paris - Tél. : +33 (0) 1 53 34 10 10 - Fax : +33 (0) 1 53 34 10 11 - [email protected] - www.piasa.fr PIASA SA - Ventes volontaires aux enchères publiques - agrément n° 2001-020 MERCREDI 13 AVRIL 2011 - DROUOT RICHELIEU COUV PIASA 130411.indd 1 18/03/11 13:50:39 CALENDRIER DES VENTES AVRIL – JUIN 2011 AVRIL JUIN DESSINS, TABLEAUX ET SCULPTURES PHOTOGRAPHIES ANCIENNES, MODERNES DES XIXe ET XXe SIÈCLES Vendredi 1er avril 2011 ET CONTEMPORAINES Mercredi 1er juin 2011 ART D’ASIE Lundi 4 avril 2011 BANDE DESSINÉE ART CONTEMPORAIN Mardi 7 juin 2011 Vendredi 8 avril 2011 HAUTE ÉPOQUE MANUSCRITS Mercredi 8 juin 2011 Mercredi 13 avril 2011 ESTAMPES H. M. PETIET Jeudi 9 juin 2011 MAI ART D’ASIE LIVRES ANCIENS ET MODERNES Vendredi 10 juin 2011 Mardi 3 mai 2011 DESSINS, TABLEAUX ET SCULPTURES MOBILIER ET OBJETS D’ART DES XIXe ET XXe SIÈCLES Mercredi 4 mai 2011 PIASA Vendredi 17 juin 2011 ESTAMPES ANCIENNES ET MODERNES Jeudi 5 mai 2011 MANUSCRITS ESTIMATIONS GRATUITES Lundi 20 et mardi 21 juin 2011 ET CONFIDENTIELLES ART D’ASIE SANS RENDEZ-VOUS Mardi 17 mai 2011 ART CONTEMPORAIN MODE - HAUTE COUTURE Mercredi 22 juin 2011 Alexis VELLIET Henri-Pierre TEISSEDRE Delphine de COURTRY Jeudi 19 mai 2011 TABLEAUX ANCIENS Commissaires-priseurs ARTS DÉCORATIFS DU XXe SIÈCLE Vendredi 24 juin 2011 Vendredi 20 mai 2011 5, rue Drouot 75009 Paris BIJOUX ET ARGENTERIE Tél.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle of Waterloo Napoleon’S Final Defeat
    BATTLE OF WATERLOO NAPOLEON’S FINAL DEFEAT TO HELL AND BACK THE AFTERLIFE IN ANCIENT GREECE BUILDING THE PANTHEON ROME’S ORIGINAL SUPERDOME THE SILK ROAD WHEN EAST MET WEST PLUS: JANUARY/FEBRUARY 201 Discovering Gilgamesh The World’s First Action Hero The History of Spain: Land on a Crossroad TIME Taught by Professor Joyce E. Salisbury ED O T FF I E UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN–GREEN BAY IM R L 70% LECTURE TITLES 1. From Stones to Bronze: Prehistoric Spain off 2. Celtic, Phoenician, and Greek Colonists 7 O R H 3. Rome Conquers the Iberian Peninsula D C E R R BY MA 4. Christianity Comes to Hispania 5. Barbarian Tribes Divide the Peninsula 6. The Visigoths Unite Spain 7. Islam: The New Religion 8. Confl ict within Islam 9. The Moors and the Glory of al-Andalus 10. The Christian Reconquista 11. Medieval Spanish Culture 12. The Sephardim: Iberian Judaism 13. Gypsy Infl uences on Spain 14. The Growth of Catholic Religious Passion 15. Columbus and the New World 16. Conquistadors and Missionaries 17. The Spanish Main: Trade Convoys and Piracy 18. The Golden Age of the Spanish Habsburgs 19. Religious Wars on Muslims and Protestants 20. The 18th-Century Bourbon Kings of Spain 21. Spain Loses Its Empire 22. 20th-Century Spanish Modernism 23. The Spanish Civil War and Franco’s Reign Discover the Powerful Influences 24. Modern Spain: Still on a Crossroad Spain Had on World History Spain has played a unique and pivotal role in Western civilization. In The History of Spain: Land on a Crossroad The History of Spain: Land on a Crossroad, Professor Emerita Joyce E.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Centre-Ville De Nantes : a La Recherche D'un Projet D'amenagement
    249 LE CENTRE-VILLE DE NANTES : A LA RECHERCHE D'UN PROJET D'AMENAGEMENT Jean-Pierre Peyon !GARUN ~UME: Le centre-ville de Nantes reste marqué par l'héritage architectural et urbanistique du XVIIIe siècle. Il a connu de profonds bouleversements dans les années Trente par le comblement des bras de la Loire et de !'Erdre. Des opérations de rénovation lourde ont été associées à la reconstruction d'après-guerre mais il faudra attendre la fin des années Soixante pour que la municipalité nantaise s'interroge sur l'avenir de ce riche patrimoine . La mise à l'étude, en 1972, d'un plan de sauvegarde, sa publication en 1980, marquent cette volonté mais les réalisations restent rares et le bilan est encore modeste, comparé à d'autres grandes villes françaises. ABS1RACT: The architecture and lay-out of Nantes's center bears the mark of its XVIDth century heritage . Drastic alterations were made in the thirties, when branches of the Loire and Erdre were filled in. Major urban renewal was carried out during post-war reconstruction, but not until the late sixties would a city govemment stop to consider the future of this rich heritage. This new determination was expressed by the launching of a preservation plan in 1972, followed by its publication in 1980. However, few projects have been implemented so far, and the list of achievements remains modest in comparison with other large french cities. Mots-clés : Centre-ville - Secteur sauvegardé - Rénovation - Réhabilitation - Nantes. Key worœ: City center - Preserved area - Restoration - Rehabilitation - Nantes. Le repérage du centre-ville de Nantes pose quelques problèmes méthodologiques que nous ne ferons qu'évoquer ici, notre propos étant d'analyser les aménagements passés et actuels de cet espace privilégié.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Cambronne
    Portrait of General Pierre Cambronne (1770-1842) Attributed to Jean Baptiste Joseph de Bay (1779-1862) Circa 1816 Plaster Bust Height: 59 cm. This elegant plaster herm, full of brio in the hair, represents one of the best known characters of the Napoleonic era. Born in Nantes in 1770, Cambronne joined the Grenadiers in 1792 and fought several campaigns for Napoleon, rising through the ranks and acquiring a Légion d’ Honneur and the title of Count. His name is of course forever linked to the final moments of the Battle of Waterloo and to the word that he, according to some, shouted when Colville told him to surrender. Cambronne insisted for all his life that his words were “La Garde meure et ne se rend pas!” (“The Guard dies and does not surrender!”), but the legend that he swore with what later became know as “le mot de Cambronne” became immensely popular. So much that Victor Hugo included it in Les Misérables : “Le lecteur français voulant être respecté, le plus beau mot peut-être qu’un Français ait jamais dit ne peut lui être répété. […] L’homme qui a gagné la bataille de Waterloo, ce n’est pas Napoléon en déroute, ce n’est pas Wellington pliant à quatre heures, désespéré à cinq, ce n’est pas Blücher qui ne s’est point battu ; l’homme qui a gagné la bataille de Waterloo, c’est Cambronne. Foudroyer d’un tel mot le tonnerre qui vous tue, c’est vaincre.”. After Waterloo, Cambronne remained in the army and became a Viscount.
    [Show full text]
  • How the French Won Waterloo: Or Think They Did Free
    FREE HOW THE FRENCH WON WATERLOO: OR THINK THEY DID PDF Stephen Clarke | 304 pages | 16 Jun 2016 | Cornerstone | 9780099594994 | English | London, United Kingdom How the French won Waterloo (or think they did) | The Spectator Australia Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. How the French Won Waterloo: Or Think They Did editions. Enlarge cover. Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Details if other :. Thanks for telling us about How the French Won Waterloo: Or Think They Did problem. Return to Book Page. Two centuries after the Battle of Waterloo, the French are still in denial. If Napoleon lost on 18 June and that's a big 'if'then whoever rules the universe got Published in the th Anniversary year of the Battle of Waterloo a witty look at how the French still think they won, by Stephen Clarke, author of Years of Annoying the French and A How the French Won Waterloo: Or Think They Did in the Merde. If Napoleon lost on 18 June and that's a big 'if'then whoever rules the universe got it wrong. As soon as the cannons stopped How the French Won Waterloo: Or Think They Did, French historians began re-writing history. The Duke of Wellington was beaten, they say, and then the Prussians jumped into the boxing ring, breaking all the rules of battle. In essence, the French cannot bear the idea that Napoleon, their greatest- ever national hero, was in any way a loser.
    [Show full text]
  • Baptisms of Fire: How Training, Equipment, and Ideas About the Nation Shaped the British, French, and German Soldiers' Experiences of War in 1914
    BAPTISMS OF FIRE: HOW TRAINING, EQUIPMENT, AND IDEAS ABOUT THE NATION SHAPED THE BRITISH, FRENCH, AND GERMAN SOLDIERS' EXPERIENCES OF WAR IN 1914 Chad R. Gaudet A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 2009 Committee: Dr. Douglas J. Forsyth, Advisor Dr. Nathan Richardson Graduate Faculty Representative Dr. Stephen G. Fritz Dr. Beth A. Griech-Polelle ii ABSTRACT Dr. Douglas J. Forsyth, Advisor Training, equipment, and ideas about the nation shaped the British, French, and German soldiers’ experiences of war in 1914. Though current scholarship contained works that examined each of those topics separately or in combination, little research investigated the connection in a comparative model from the perspective of the soldiers. This work analyzed the British, French, and German soldiers of World War I during the initial phase (August--November 1914). This critical period of the war proved an excellent way to test these ideas. The project relied heavily on combatants’ personal accounts, which included archival sources. The troopers experience with initial combat served as a test. How those soldiers reacted suggested the connections with training, equipment, and ideas about the nation. The results supported the theory that the professionalism of the British soldier and the French soldier’s devotion to nation and comrade outweighed the German Army’s reliance on both equipment and the doctrine of winning at all costs. Nationalism, equipment, and training influenced soldiery. German equipment provided an edge, but it was not enough. Not only did nationalist sentiment among soldiers exist at the beginning of World War I, three different conceptions of nationalism were present.
    [Show full text]
  • Dossier De Presse Route Napoléon Itinéraire Touristique De Golfe-Juan À Grenoble
    Dossier de Presse ROUTE NAPOLÉON Itinéraire touristique de Golfe-Juan à Grenoble www.route-napoleon.com 1815–2015 : Route Napoléon CRT CÔTE D’AZUR – Tél. 33 (0)4 93 37 78 78 er www.cotedazur-tourisme.com Bicentenaire du retour de l’Empereur Napoléon 1 CONTACTS PRESSE : de l’Ile d’Elbe Presse France : Sophie Brugerolles [email protected] Presse Internationale : Florence Lecointre [email protected] EDITO Le 1er mars 1815, après 10 mois d’exil sur l’île d’Elbe, Napoléon Ier débarquait sur les plages de Golfe-Juan, faisant des Alpes-Maritimes le point de départ de l’ultime "Vol de l’Aigle". 200 ans plus tard, notre département a souhaité commémorer cet épisode incontournable de l’épopée napoléonienne, à travers un riche programme d’événements et de manifestations qui s’étaleront tout au long de l’année 2015. Après les 60 ans de la Libération en 2004, les 150 ans du rattachement du Comté de Nice à la France en 2010, les 50 ans de l’exode d’Algérie en 2012, et le centenaire du début de la Grande-Guerre en 2014, c’est donc un nouveau temps fort d’histoire, de mémoire et de culture que la Côte d’Azur s’apprête à vivre. Célébrer le bicentenaire des "cents-jours", c’est cultiver l’héritage de Napoléon Bonaparte, qui, par sa personnalité, sa vision de la France et de l’Etat, sa fidélité aux idéaux de la révolution, a profondément et durablement marqué la construc- tion de notre nation. C’est aussi l’occasion de mettre en valeur les innombrables richesses des territoires qui jalonnent la "Route Napoléon", notamment au travers de nombreux séjours touristiques spécialement conçus et proposés à l’occasion de ce bicentenaire.
    [Show full text]