DOCSLIB.ORG

Covid-19 Related Travel Restrictions – a Global Review for Tourism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Covid-19 Related Travel Restrictions – a Global Review for Tourism COVID-19 RELATED TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS – A GLOBAL REVIEW FOR TOURISM COVID - 19 RELATED TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS A GLOBAL REVIEW FOR TOURISM First report as of 16 April 2020 COVID - 19 RELATED TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS A GLOBAL REVIEW FOR TOURISM First report as of 16 April 2020 Prepared by UNWTO Sustainable Development of Tourism Department COVID-19 RELATED TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS – A GLOBAL REVIEW FOR TOURISM Acknowledgments This interim report COVID-19 related Travel Restrictions – A Global Review for Tourism was developed by the World Tourism Organization’s (UNWTO) Sustainable Development of Tourism Department. The report was prepared under the supervision of Dr. Dirk Glaesser with lead contributions from Lorna Hartantyo, Marianna Stori and Cordula Wohlmuther. Virginia Fernández-Trapa reviewed and provided thorough feedback to the report. Comments on the draft of this report were provided by Sandra Carvao, Orianne Derrier, Hernán Epstein, Harry Hwang, Beka Jakeli and Merjen Meretgulyyeva. Layout of the cover was provided by Alberto G. Uceda and layout of the report by Javier P. Spuch. COVID-19 RELATED TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS – A GLOBAL REVIEW FOR TOURISM COVID-19 RELATED TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS – A GLOBAL REVIEW FOR TOURISM Table of Contents Key Facts ........................................................................................................................................................................................................2 Summary of Findings ...............................................................................................................................................................................3 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................................................8 2. Background on COVID-19 and pandemic measures ............................................................................................................9 3. Implementation of travel restrictions during COVID-19 outbreak until 6 April 2020 .........................................10 4. Evolution of travel restrictions by region .................................................................................................................................11 5. Regional breakdown of destinations with travel restrictions .........................................................................................14 6. Categories of travel restrictions ...................................................................................................................................................15 Annex ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................18 Table of Figures Figure 1 - Number of confirmed cases and destinations with COVID-19 related travel restrictions ................10 Figure 2 - Destinations with travel restrictions as of 9 March 2020 ................................................................................11 Figure 3 - Destinations with travel restrictions as of 16 March 2020 ...............................................................................12 Figure 4 - Destinations with travel restrictions as of 24 March 2020 ..............................................................................12 Figure 5 - Destinations with travel restrictions as of 6 April 2020 ....................................................................................13 Figure 6 - Global and regional breakdown of destinations with travel restrictions .................................................14 Figure 7 - Changes in type of travel restriction over time ....................................................................................................15 Figure 8 - Type of travel restriction by destination as of 6 of April .................................................................................16 COVID-19 RELATED TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS – A GLOBAL REVIEW FOR TOURISM 1 COVID-19 RELATED TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS – A GLOBAL REVIEW FOR TOURISM Key Facts • As of 6 April 2020, 96% of all world • 4 DOMINATING CATEGORIES OF TRAVEL destinations have travel restrictions. RESTRICTIVE MEASURES are currently applied: • This means that 209 DESTINATIONS 1. Complete or partial closure of border - WORLDWIDE ADOPTED COVID-19 RELATED “Passengers are not allowed to enter”. TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS. 2. Destination-specific travel restriction - Percentage of all destinations per region: “Passengers who have transited or been in x are not allowed to enter”. 100% OF AFRICA 100% OF ASIA AND THE PACIFIC 3. Suspension of flights, all or partially - “all 100% OF MIDDLE EAST flights are suspended”. 93% OF EUROPE 92% OF AMERICAS 4. Different measures: Quarantine or self- isolation, Visa measures, Travel bans to pas- • About 90 destinations have completely sengers coming from certain regions within or partially closed their borders for a destination, or passengers with specific tourists, while another 44 destinations are nationalities, Medical certificate requested implementing the closing of borders in a more upon arrival. differentiated manner by identifying specific countries of origin. • NO DESTINATION HAS LIFTED a TRAVEL RESTRICTION as of 6 April 2020. COVID-19 RELATED TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS – A GLOBAL REVIEW FOR TOURISM 2 COVID-19 RELATED TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS – A GLOBAL REVIEW FOR TOURISM COVID-19 RELATED TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS – A GLOBAL REVIEW FOR TOURISM Summary of Findings 1) Volume and severity of travel 2) Currently 96% of all world restrictions under COVID-19 crisis is destinations have travel restrictions unprecedented Within less than 10 weeks, between the end of The current COVID-19 crisis has impacted on travel January 2020 and 6 April 2020, 209 destinations like no other event in history before. Almost all have implemented measures, restricting travel in destinations in the world have imposed travel reaction to the COVID-19 outbreak. This amounts restrictions since January 2020, including very to 96 % of all destinations worldwide. severe measures such as the banning of all travel in some destinations. As of 6 April 2020, 90 destinations have completely or partially closed their borders for tourists, while UNWTO has been monitoring travel restrictions another 44 destinations are implementing the and facilitation measures for several years. closing of borders in a more differentiated manner UNWTO’s regularly published Visa Openness by referring to countries of origin, such as China, reports1 have shown a continuously growing Republic of Korea, Iran, Italy or European Union or trend for more than a decade, on the number of others, from where travellers are not allowed to destinations facilitating visa policies for temporary enter the destination. visitors (tourists). When reporting last in 2018, the world openness reached its highest level ever, with an openness of 37 index points.2 Figure A - Destinations with travel restrictions as of 6 April 2020 Source: Data compiled by UNWTO3. 1 World Tourism Organization, Travel Facilitation reports are available online at: www.unwto.org/sustainable-development/travel-facilitation. 2 The Openness Index ranges from 0 – 100 and is calculated by summing the percentage of the world population affected by no visa weighted by 1, visa on arrival weighted by 0.7, eVisa by 0.5 and traditional visa weighted by 0. 3 The maps elaborated by UNWTO are for reference only and do not imply any judgement on the legal status of any territory, or any endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. COVID-19 RELATED TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS – A GLOBAL REVIEW FOR TOURISM COVID-19 RELATED TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS – A GLOBAL REVIEW FOR TOURISM 2 3 COVID-19 RELATED TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS – A GLOBAL REVIEW FOR TOURISM Looking at regional trends in the five UNWTO 3) Travel restrictions have expanded regions, all the destinations (100%) in the regions geographically as the number of of Africa, Asia and the Pacific, as well as the Middle confirmed cases grows East have implemented travel restrictions, while in the European region 93% and in the Americas By mid-February 2020, only two weeks after 92% of destinations have implemented travel COVID-19 was declared a Public Health Emergency restrictions. of International Concern (PHEIC), a total of 62 destinations had implemented travel restrictions. Figure B - Travel restrictions have expanded Out of those destinations, more than half were geographically as the number of confirmed cases from Asia and the Pacific region. grows In the following weeks and with the spread of COVID-19 to additional countries, gradually destinations in other regions joined in restricting the entry of tourists. A significant increase was observed between 9 and 24 March 2020, when the number of destinations imposing travel restrictions more than doubled, from 81 to 181, following the declaration of COVID-19 as a Pandemic by WHO on 11 March 2020. Source: Data compiled by UNWTO as of 6 April 2020. Figure C - Number of confirmed cases and destinations with COVID-19-related travel restrictions Source: UNWTO SDT, based on desk research from IATA Travel Centre, WHO Extranet and International SOS. COVID-19 RELATED TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS – A GLOBAL REVIEW FOR TOURISM 4 COVID-19 RELATED TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS – A GLOBAL REVIEW FOR TOURISM COVID-19 RELATED TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS – A GLOBAL REVIEW FOR TOURISM 4) Travel restrictions affecting tourists can be grouped
Load more

Recommended publications
  • View Document
    Application Report Date: 2016/05/05 For Region: All Time: 10:19:28 For Application Type: All Page: 1 For Application Status: ACCEPTED For Date Range: 2016/04/01 to 2016/04/30 Region Application Type Ref. No. Registered Name Status Date EC Retail New B/2016/04/20/0002 BLACK OIL HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD ACCEPTED - PENDING DOCUMENTATION 2016/04/20 EC Site New B/2016/04/20/0001 TRAKPROPS 146 (PTY) LTD ACCEPTED - PENDING DOCUMENTATION 2016/04/20 EC Retail New (Change-of-Hands) B/2016/04/25/0002 CALANDRA TRADING 669 CC ACCEPTED - PENDING DOCUMENTATION 2016/04/25 EC Retail New (Change-of-Hands) B/2016/04/25/0001 CALANDRA TRADING 669 CC ACCEPTED - PENDING DOCUMENTATION 2016/04/25 FS Retail New (Change-of-Hands) C/2016/04/29/0001 HECTOR AUSTIN ENGINEERING (PTY) LTD ACCEPTED - PENDING DOCUMENTATION 2016/04/29 FS Retail New (Change-of-Hands) C/2016/04/21/0001 DAIZEBEL (PTY) LTD ACCEPTED - PENDING DOCUMENTATION 2016/04/21 FS Retail New (Change-of-Hands) C/2016/04/26/0001 MAJA FUELS (PTY) LTD ACCEPTED - PENDING DOCUMENTATION 2016/04/26 FS Retail New (Change-of-Hands) C/2016/04/08/0001 MINOZEST (PTY) LTD ACCEPTED - PENDING DOCUMENTATION 2016/04/08 GP Retail New D/2016/04/22/0003 LAMANI BUSINESS ENTERPRISES (PTY) LTD ACCEPTED - PENDING DOCUMENTATION 2016/04/22 GP Retail Temporary D/2006/08/17/0015/T16/1 CJ & CK (PTY) LTD ACCEPTED 2016/04/14 GP Site New D/2016/04/22/0002 TOWER PROPERTY FUND LIMITED ACCEPTED - PENDING DOCUMENTATION 2016/04/22 GP Wholesale New D/2016/04/29/0001 JUNE PETROLEUM PTY LTD ACCEPTED - PENDING DOCUMENTATION 2016/04/29 GP Wholesale New
    [Show full text]
  • System/370 Model 145 Reference Summary
    System/370 Model 145 Reference Summary S229-2239-1 IBM Corporation, Field Support Documentation, Dept 927, Rochester, Minnesota 55901 PREFACE This publication is primarily intended for customer engineers servicing System/370 Model 145. Second Edition (September 1972) This is a major revision of, and makes 8229-2239-0 obsolete. Address any comments concerning the contents of this publication to: IBM, Field Support Documentation, Dept 927, Rochester, Minnesota 55901 © International Business Machines Corporation 1972 CONTENTS Section 1 - Control Words Branch and Module Switch Word "O" . 1. 1 Branch Word . 1.2 GA Function Charts . 1.3 GA Function Charts . 1.4 GA Function Charts . 1.5 Branch and Link or Return Word . 1.6 Word Move Word Version"O" . 1. 7 Word Move Word Version "1" . 1.8 Storage Word, Non K-Addressable . 1.9 Storage Word, K-Addressable . 1.10 Arithmetic Word 10 Byte Version 1.11 Arithmetic Word, Fullword Version 1.12 Arithmetic Word, 11 Direct ByteVersion . 1.13 Arithmetic Word, 10/11 Indirect Byte Version . 1.14 ALU Entry Gating 1.15 Stat Set Symbols . 1.15 BranchSymbols . 1.15 Arithmetic Word Chart Selection 1.16 Address Formation Chart 1.16 Control Word Chart Selection 1.16 Section 2 - CPU 3145 CPU Data Flow . 2.1 I-Cycles Data Flow . 2.2 I-Cycles . 2.3 PSW Locations . 2.3 Expanded Local Storage . 2.3 I-Cycles . 2.3 I-Cycles Control Line Generation . 2.4 Control Word . 2.4 Control Register Decode . 2.4 iii ECCL Board Layout ............ 2.5 Data Bit Location Chart .......... 2.5 Common Test Points ...........
    [Show full text]
  • Prioritization 4.0
    Prioritization 4.0 NCDOT Strategic Prioritization Office of Transportation July 2015 Agenda • Background • General Overview of Changes From P3.0 To P4.0 • Scoring and Scaling • Peak ADT • In-Depth Review of P4.0 Highway Criteria, Measures and Weights • In-Depth Review of P4.0 Non-Highway Criteria, Measures and Weights • Timeline/Schedule • SPOT On!ine • Local Input Methodologies and Best Practices 2 Background NCDOT is responsible for 6 modes of transportation: • Aviation (74 publicly‐owned airports) • Bicycle and Pedestrian • Ferries –2nd largest system in US (behind Washington) • Highways – Maintains 80,000 miles of highways (2nd only to Texas) • Public Transportation • Rail Annual Budget of approx. $4.1 B (federal dollars account for 25% of total budget) 3 Background Key Partners, as shown on colorful map below, include: • 19 Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) • 18 Rural Planning Organizations (RPOs) • 14 Field Offices (Divisions) *Unifour RPO has dissolved into adjacent MPOs 4 Strategic Transportation Investment (STI) New funding formula for NCDOT’s Capital Expenditures • Focus on Mobility/Expansion and Modernization projects for all modes House Bill 817 signed into Law June 26, 2013 Most significant transportation legislation in NC since 1989 Prioritization Workgroup charged with providing recommendations to NCDOT on weights and criteria. Reps include: • MPOs • RPOs • Division Engineers • Local Government Advocacy Groups 5 STI Legislation New funding formula for all capital expenditures, regardless of mode. All modes must
    [Show full text]
  • ILK]: Driver Should Make Sure the First 3D Command After the Engine Switch from BLT Not to Be 1
    Intel® OpenSource HD Graphics PRM Volume 1 Part 5: Graphics Core - Blitter Engine For the all new 2010 Intel Core Processor Family Programmer’s Reference Manual (PRM) March 2010 Revision 1.0 Doc Ref #: IHD_OS_V1Pt5_3_10 Creative Commons License You are free: to Share — to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work Under the following conditions: Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). No Derivative Works. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH INTEL® PRODUCTS. NO LICENSE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, BY ESTOPPEL OR OTHERWISE, TO ANY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IS GRANTED BY THIS DOCUMENT. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN INTEL’S TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE FOR SUCH PRODUCTS, INTEL ASSUMES NO LIABILITY WHATSOEVER, AND INTEL DISCLAIMS ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY, RELATING TO SALE AND/OR USE OF INTEL PRODUCTS INCLUDING LIABILITY OR WARRANTIES RELATING TO FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, MERCHANTABILITY, OR INFRINGEMENT OF ANY PATENT, COPYRIGHT OR OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT. Intel products are not intended for use in medical, life saving, or life sustaining applications. Intel may make changes to specifications and product descriptions at any time, without notice. Designers must not rely on the absence or characteristics of any features or instructions marked "reserved" or "undefined." Intel reserves these for future definition and shall have no responsibility whatsoever for conflicts or incompatibilities arising from future changes to them. The Sandy Bridge chipset family, Havendale/Auburndale chipset family, Intel® 965 Express Chipset Family, Intel® G35 Express Chipset, and Intel® 965GMx Chipset Mobile Family Graphics Controller may contain design defects or errors known as errata which may cause the product to deviate from published specifications.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Tourism Lexicon: Rewriting Our Industry's Narrative
    POLICY BRIEF THE NEW TOURISM LEXICON: REWRITING OUR INDUSTRY'S NARRATIVE Last year, Destinations International released a policy "Washington is the problem. Remind voters again and brief entitled, “Advocacy in the Face of Ideology,” which again about Washington spending, Washington waste, made the case that relying on ROI numbers to defend Washington taxation, Washington bureaucracy, the value and relevancy of a destination organization Washington rules and Washington regulations." was no longer a viable advocacy strategy. Instead, we Luntz also suggested replacing "drilling for oil" with argued, destination organizations need to support the "exploring for energy," "undocumented workers" with message of ROI in terms of dollars and cents with an "illegal aliens," and "estate tax" with "death tax." The ideological and value-based appeal to convince political substitutions often work — an Ipsos/NPR poll found that leaders that without a destination organization, these support for abolishing the estate tax jumps to 76% from returns will inevitably vanish. 65% when you call it the death tax. Our industry has unfortunately fallen for what George Lakoff, a professor of Cognitive Science and Linguistics at the University of California at Berkeley, dubs the “Enlightenment Fallacy.” According to this viewpoint, you simply need to tell people the facts in clear language and they’ll reason to the right, true conclusions. The problem, as Lakoff puts it is, “The cognitive and brain sciences have shown this is false… it’s false in every single detail.” The reality is that people tend to frame political arguments, and the facts behind them, in terms of their own values.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Ipv6 Security in the LAN Gilles Roy, Technical Leader BRKSEC-3003 in 2015, 55% of Attacks Are from the Inside! *
    Advanced IPv6 Security in the LAN Gilles Roy, Technical Leader BRKSEC-3003 In 2015, 55% of attacks are from the inside! * Source: 2015 IBM Cyber Security Report 3 There is a lot happening on the LAN, it can be difficult to follow everything, lets break it down. 1. Operations 2. Attacks 3. Mitigations 4. Use cases 4 Use cases Enterprise SP Access Datacenter Address Allocation ✔ ✖ ✖ Duplicate Address Detection ✔ ✔ ✔ Address Resolution ✔ ✖ ✔ Operation Neighbor Unreachability Detection ✔ ✖ ✔ Prefix Allocation ✖ ✔ ✖ Making Default Router Discovery ✔ ✖ ✔ sense of Denial of Link Operations ✔ ✖ ✔ Denial of Address Resolution ✔ ✖ ✔ YOUR Router Theft ✔ ✔ ✔ Attacks Address Theft ✔ ✖ ✔ setup. Denial of Address Configuration ✔ ✔ ✖ Denial of Address Assignment ✔ ✖ ✖ RA Guard ✔ ✔ ✔ DHCP Guard ✔ ✔ ✖ Mitigation Source Guard ✔ ✖ ✔ Destination Guard ✔ ✖ ✖ Binding Guard ✔ ✖ ✔ 5 Abstract summary and pre-requisite • This session focuses on IPv6 security within the layer-2 domain • With a multi-dimensional approach: operations, vulnerabilities, mitigations and use-cases • It introduces security features at the First Hop, such RA Guard, Source Guard, Destination guard, etc • Requirements: Knowledge of IPv6 and IPv6 Neighbor Discovery 6 Agenda • IPv6 in the layer-2 domain: operations and protocols • IPv6 in the layer-2 domain: vulnerabilities • Attack Demonstration • Mitigating Vulnerabilities • Use cases overview 7 Some background on layer-2 & IPv6 • Layer-2: what is it? • Layer-2 domain: also “broadcast domain”, link, lan, vlan, segment • Nodes: hosts, routers,
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Most Appropriate Indicators Related to the Basic Concepts
    D 4.1 – Report on the most appropriate indicators related to the basic concepts Report on the most appropriate indicators related to the basic concepts Deliverable D4.1 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 870708 D 4.1 – Report on the most appropriate indicators related to the basic concepts Disclaimer: The contents of this deliverable are the sole responsibility of one or more Parties of the SmartCulTour consortium and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the Research Executive Agency and European Commission under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 programme. Copyright and Reprint Permissions “You may freely reproduce all or part of this paper for non-commercial purposes, provided that the following conditions are fulfilled: (i) to cite the authors, as the copyright owners (ii) to cite the SmartCulTour Project and mention that the EC co-finances it, by means of including this statement “Smart Cultural Tourism as a Driver of Sustainable Development of European Regions - SmartCulTour Project no. H2020-870708 co financed by EC H2020 program” and (iii) not to alter the information.” _______________________________________________________________________________________ How to quote this document: Petrić, L., Mandić, A., Pivčević, S., Škrabić Perić, B., Hell, M., Šimundić, B., Muštra, V., Mikulić, D., & Grgić, J. (2020). Report on the most appropriate indicators related to the basic concepts. Deliverable 4.1 of the Horizon 2020 project SmartCulTour (GA number 870708), published on the project web site on September 2020: http://www.smartcultour.eu/deliverables/ D 4.1 – Report on the most appropriate indicators related to the basic concepts This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No.
    [Show full text]
  • Decnet-Plusftam and Virtual Terminal Use and Management
    VSI OpenVMS DECnet-Plus FTAM and Virtual Terminal Use and Management Document Number: DO-FTAMMG-01A Publication Date: June 2020 Revision Update Information: This is a new manual. Operating System and Version: VSI OpenVMS Integrity Version 8.4-2 VSI OpenVMS Alpha Version 8.4-2L1 VMS Software, Inc., (VSI) Bolton, Massachusetts, USA DECnet-PlusFTAM and Virtual Terminal Use and Management Copyright © 2020 VMS Software, Inc. (VSI), Bolton, Massachusetts, USA Legal Notice Confidential computer software. Valid license from VSI required for possession, use or copying. Consistent with FAR 12.211 and 12.212, Commercial Computer Software, Computer Software Documentation, and Technical Data for Commercial Items are licensed to the U.S. Government under vendor's standard commercial license. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The only warranties for VSI products and services are set forth in the express warranty statements accompanying such products and services. Nothing herein should be construed as constituting an additional warranty. VSI shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions contained herein. HPE, HPE Integrity, HPE Alpha, and HPE Proliant are trademarks or registered trademarks of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. Intel, Itanium and IA-64 are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries in the United States and other countries. UNIX is a registered trademark of The Open Group. The VSI OpenVMS documentation set is available on DVD. ii DECnet-PlusFTAM and Virtual
    [Show full text]
  • The (Many) Paths to “Destination X”
    Blog The (many) paths to “Destination X” Michelle Batten Head of Global Marketing, Mobile Division, Amadeus According to Amadeus’ new whitepaper, Better travel in the Live Travel Space “Get ready for Destination X,” today’s travel sellers have a golden opportunity to Destination X also offers enormous tap into destination services, a growing untapped potential to market and sell marketplace set to reach $183 billion by ancillary destination services to travelers. 2020. Drawing on survey results from It’s a place where travel agents, corporate more than a thousand CheckMyTrip by travel programs, and other providers of Amadeus mobile app users, the research flights, hotels and cars can continue identifies emerging trends about business servicing travelers at their final destination. and leisure travelers destined for Whether traveling on business, leisure or Destination X, one of the most important bleisure, mobile provides the perfect revenue-generating stops on a traveler’s platform to offer these destination services journey. on the move. Take me to travel nirvana Amadeus is helping travel providers better understand and address these challenges The Amadeus research poses questions and opportunities. Using the Amadeus such as, “Are travelers prepared as they Travel Platform, the Live Travel Space arrive to Destination X?” Are their needs aggregates all content into one platform, for add-on destination services like airport making it easier for travel sellers to find transfers, local activities and restaurant what they need, and provide the level of reservations being met? The paper personalization their travelers demand. explores eight trends regarding the challenges and opportunities travel sellers Are you ready to service customers more face in the post-booking ancillary game fully when they reach Destination X? and how you can win travelers trust in Download the whitepaper today at that arena.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Contamination Risks Associated with Dust Soil Composted
    Assessing Contamination Risk of Dust, Soil, Compost, Compost Amended Soil and Irrigation Water as Vehicles of Pathogen Contamination on Iceberg Lettuce Surfaces Sadhana Ravishankar and Govindaraj Dev Kumar School of Animal & Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 Project Report Submitted to the Arizona Iceberg Lettuce Research Council, 2014 1 Introduction The contamination of fresh produce by foodborne pathogens results in 9.5 million illnesses in the United States annually, causing $39 billion in medical losses (Schraff 2010). Iceberg lettuce and similar leafy greens are usually consumed raw with minimal processing or heat treatment. Hence, there is an increased risk of pathogen transmission from contaminated product. Fresh fruit and produce could be contaminated by spoilage or pathogenic microorganisms during pre-harvest and post-harvest procedures (Brandl, 2006). It has also been indicated that the produce might become contaminated during production in the field or in the packing house (Brandl, 2006; Lynch, Tauxe, & Hedberg, 2009). There has been an increase in produce related outbreaks in recent years. Animals are the primary hosts of Salmonella enterica and the pathogen possesses genes to invade, survive host cells and resist immune defense mechanisms (Wallis & Galyov, 2000). Salmonella also has genes that confer fitness in non-host environments. The application of soil amended with manure produced by food animals could introduce foodborne pathogens in the farm environment (Hutchison, Walters, Moore, Crookes, & Avery, 2004). Several studies have demonstrated the persistence of Salmonella in the farm environment. The pathogen was detected in dairy farms, piggeries and slaughterhouse facilities both before and after slaughter (Baloda, Christensen, & Trajcevska, 2001; Hurd, McKean, Griffith, Wesley, & Rostagno, 2002; Millemann, Gaubert, Remy, & Colmin, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Coordinated, Network-Wide Traffic
    Towards Coordinated, Network-Wide Traffic Monitoring for Early Detection of DDoS Flooding Attacks by Saman Taghavi Zargar B.Sc., Computer Engineering (Software Engineering), Azad University of Mashhad, 2004 M.Sc., Computer Engineering (Software Engineering), Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, 2007 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the School of Information Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2014 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF INFORMATION SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Saman Taghavi Zargar It was defended on June 3, 2014 and approved by James Joshi, Ph.D., Associate Professor, School of Information Sciences David Tipper, Ph.D., Associate Professor, School of Information Sciences Prashant Krishnamurthy, Ph.D., Associate Professor, School of Information Sciences Konstantinos Pelechrinis, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, School of Information Sciences Yi Qian, Ph.D., Associate Professor, College of Engineering, Dissertation Advisors: James Joshi, Ph.D., Associate Professor, School of Information Sciences, David Tipper, Ph.D., Associate Professor, School of Information Sciences ii Copyright c by Saman Taghavi Zargar 2014 iii Towards Coordinated, Network-Wide Traffic Monitoring for Early Detection of DDoS Flooding Attacks Saman Taghavi Zargar, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2014 DDoS flooding attacks are one of the biggest concerns for security professionals and they are typically explicit attempts to disrupt legitimate users' access to services. Developing a com- prehensive defense mechanism against such attacks requires a comprehensive understanding of the problem and the techniques that have been used thus far in preventing, detecting, and responding to various such attacks. In this thesis, we dig into the problem of DDoS flooding attacks from four directions: (1) We study the origin of these attacks, their variations, and various existing defense mecha- nisms against them.
    [Show full text]
  • A Logical Approach to Representing and Reasoning About Interdomain Routing Policies
    A Logical Approach to Representing and Reasoning About Interdomain Routing Policies Anduo Wang and Zhijia Chen Temple University Abstract. The Internet paths connecting independently operated networks, also called domains or autonomous systems (ASes), are driven by semantically rich policies: the interdomain routing protocol that computes the Internet paths allows the ASes to influence path selection with their local policies, such as economic concerns or operational constraints. An AS can promote a policy compliant but globally longer path by carefully tweaking lower level path attributes that are used in the routing protocol. Such operational policies are notoriously complex and hard to understand. This paper takes a step back and asks whether a more principled logical approach can lead to AS policies that are easier to under- stand, reuse, evolve, and coexist. To this end, we propose to represent policies by database integrity constraints, in the form of headless datalog rules about what are the acceptable Internet paths. The simple datalog expression unifies a wide spectrum of AS policies, ranging from classic examples seen in today’s routing practice to futuristic ones proposed in various extensions to Internet routing. More importantly, by leveraging datalog’s connection to the theorem proving technique called the residue method, we developed a new technique for understanding the interactions among the policies — whether a policy can inadvertly affect another, and how to resolve the conflict. We also evaluated our logical policies, show- ing promising result with small overhead for conflict resolution on realistic large networks. 1 Introduction The Internet today is more than connecting remote hosts with valid paths.
    [Show full text]