DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of the Interior

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Department of the Interior Vol. 76 Tuesday, No. 70 April 12, 2011 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Endangered Status for the Three Forks Springsnail and San Bernardino Springsnail, and Proposed Designation of Critical Habitat; Proposed Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:12 Apr 11, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\12APP2.SGM 12APP2 erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS2 20464 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 70 / Tuesday, April 12, 2011 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Public Comments Solicited section information from the public, other below for more information). concerned governmental and tribal Fish and Wildlife Service FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: agencies, the scientific community, Steve Spangle, Field Supervisor, industry, or any other interested party 50 CFR Part 17 Arizona Ecological Services Field concerning this proposed rule. We [Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2009–0083; Office, 2321 West Royal Palm Road, particularly seek comments concerning: 92210–1117–0000–B4] Suite 103, Phoenix, Arizona, 85021; (1) Biological, commercial trade, or telephone 602–242–0210; facsimile other relevant data concerning any RIN 1018–AV84 602–242–2513. If you use a threats (or lack thereof) to these species and regulations that may be addressing Endangered and Threatened Wildlife telecommunications device for the deaf those threats. and Plants; Proposed Endangered (TDD), call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. (2) Additional information concerning Status for the Three Forks Springsnail the range, distribution, and population SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This and San Bernardino Springsnail, and size of these species, including the document consists of: (1) A proposed Proposed Designation of Critical locations of any additional populations. Habitat rule to list the Three Forks Springsnail (3) Any information on the biological and San Bernardino Springsnail as or ecological requirements of these AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, endangered; and (2) proposed critical Interior. species. habitat designations for the two species. (4) The reasons why we should or ACTION: Proposed rule. Previous Federal Actions should not designate habitat as ‘‘critical SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and habitat’’ under section 4 of the Act We first identified the Three Forks including whether there are threats to Wildlife Service (Service), propose to springsnail as a candidate for listing on list the Three Forks springsnail the species from human activity which October 30, 2001 (66 FR 54808). We first are expected to increase due to the (Pyrgulopsis trivialis) and the San identified the San Bernardino Bernardino springsnail (Pyrgulopsis designation, and whether that increase springsnail as a candidate for listing on in threat outweighs the benefit of bernardina) as endangered under the December 6, 2007 (72 FR 69034). Endangered Species Act of 1973, as designation such that the designation of Candidates are those fish, wildlife, and critical habitat may not be prudent. amended (Act). If we finalize this rule plants for which we have on file as proposed, it would extend the Act’s (5) Specific information on: sufficient information on biological • protections to these species. We also The amount and distribution of vulnerability and threats to support habitat for each species, propose to designate critical habitat for preparation of a listing proposal, but for • both species under the Act. In total, What areas occupied at the time of which development of a listing listing and that contain features approximately 4.5 hectares (11.1 acres) regulation is precluded by other higher are being proposed for designation as essential to the conservation of these priority listing activities. species should be included in the critical habitat for Three Forks On May 4, 2004, the Center for springnail in Apache County, and designation and why, Biological Diversity petitioned the • Special management considerations approximately 0.815 hectares (2.013 Service to list 225 species of plants and acres) for San Bernardino springsnail in or protections that the features essential animals as endangered under the to the conservation of both species that Cochise County, Arizona. We seek provisions of the Endangered Species information and comments from the have been identified in this proposal Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et may require, including managing for the public regarding the Three Forks and seq.), including the Three Forks San Bernardino springsnails and this potential effects of climate change, and springsnail. On June 25, 2007, we • What areas not occupied at the time proposed rule. received a petition from Forest of listing are essential for the DATES: We will accept comments Guardians to list 475 species in the conservation of the species and why. received or postmarked on or before southwestern United States as (6) Land use designations and current June 13, 2011. We must receive requests threatened or endangered under the or planned activities in the subject areas for public hearings, in writing, at the provisions of the Act, including the San and their possible impacts on proposed address shown in the FOR FURTHER Bernardino springsnail. In our most critical habitat. INFORMATION CONTACT section by May recent annual Candidate Notice of (7) Any probable economic, national 27, 2011. Review dated November 10, 2010 (75 FR security, or other relevant impacts of ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 69222), we retained a listing priority designating any area that may be by one of the following methods: number (LPN) of 2 for the Three Forks included in the final designation. We • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// springsnail and the San Bernardino are particularly interested in any www.regulations.gov. Follow the springsnail in accordance with our impacts on small entities or families, instructions for submitting comments priority guidance published on and the benefits of including or for Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2009–0083. September 21, 1983 (48 FR 43098). An excluding areas that exhibit these • U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public LPN of 2 reflects threats that are both impacts. Comments Processing, Attn: Docket No. imminent and high in magnitude, as (8) Whether we could improve or FWS–R2–ES–2009–0083; Division of well as the taxonomic classification as modify our approach to designating Policy and Directives Management; U.S. a full species. critical habitat in any way to provide for Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 N. greater public participation and Public Comments Fairfax Drive, Suite 222; Arlington, VA understanding, or to better 22203. We intend that any final action accommodate public concerns and We will not accept e-mail or faxes. We resulting from this proposed rule will be comments. will post all comments on http:// based on the best scientific and (9) Information on the projected and www.regulations.gov. This generally commercial data available and be as reasonably likely impacts of climate means that we will post any personal accurate and as effective as possible. change on both species and the critical information you provide us (see the Therefore, we request comments or habitat areas we are proposing. VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:12 Apr 11, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12APP2.SGM 12APP2 erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 70 / Tuesday, April 12, 2011 / Proposed Rules 20465 You may submit your comments and snails is 9 to 15 months (Pennak 1989, Forks springsnail is found in Taylor materials concerning this proposed rule p. 552); survival of one species in the (1987, pp. 30–32) and Hershler and by one of the methods listed in the genus Pyrgulopsis in the laboratory was Landye (1988, pp. 32–35). ADDRESSES section. 12.7 months (Lysne et al. 2007, p. 3). The Three Forks springsnail is known We will post your entire comment— Both the Three Forks springsnail and to occur in two separate spring including your personal identifying San Bernardino springsnail occur in complexes, Three Forks Springs and information—on http:// springs, seeps, spring runs, and a variety Boneyard Bog Springs in the North Fork www.regulations.gov. If you provide of waters, but particularly rheocrene East Fork Black River Watershed of the personal identifying information, such systems (water emerging from the White Mountains on the Apache- as your street address, phone number, or ground as a free-flowing stream). In the Sitgreaves National Forests in Apache e-mail address, you may request at the desert Southwest, these spring County, east-central Arizona (Myers top of your document that we withhold ecosystems are commonly referred to as 2000, p. 1; Nelson et al. 2002, p. 5). this information from public review. cienegas (Hendrickson and Minckley These spring complexes are found in However, we cannot guarantee that we 1984, pp. 133, 169; Minckley and Brown open mountain meadows at 2,500 will be able to do so. 1994, pp. 223–287). Snails in the genus meters (m) (8,200 feet (ft)) elevation and Comments and materials we receive, Pyrgulopsis are rarely found in mud or are separated by 6 kilometers (km) (3.7 as well as supporting documentation we soft sediments (Hershler 1998, p. 14) miles (mi)) of perennial flowing stream used in preparing this proposed rule, and are typically more abundant in (Martinez and Myers 2008, p. 189). The will be available for public inspection gravel to cobble size substrates (Frest species has been found in free-flowing on http://www.regulations.gov at Docket and Johannes 1995, p. 203; Malcom et springheads, concrete boxed No. FWS–R2–ES–2009–0083, or by al. 2005, p. 75; Martinez and Thome springheads, spring runs, spring seeps, appointment, during normal business 2006, pp. 12–13; Lysne et al. 2007, p. and shallow ponded water at Three hours, at the Arizona Ecological 650).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SPRING HILL RANCH Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service______National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) 0MB No. 1024-0018 SPRING HILL RANCH Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service_______________________________ National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: Spring Hill Ranch Other Name/Site Number: Deer Park Place; Davis Ranch; Davis-Noland-Merrill Grain Company Ranch; Z Bar Ranch 2. LOCATION Street & Number: North of Strong City on Kansas Highway 177 Not for publication: City/Town: Strong City Vicinity: X State: Kansas County: Chase Code: 017 Zip Code: 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: X Building(s): __ Public-Local: __ District: X Public-State: __ Site: __ Public-Federal: Structure: __ Object: _ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 8 _1_ buildings __ sites _5_ structures _ objects 14 12 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 2 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing :N/A Designated a NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK on NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) 0MB No 1024-0018 SPRING HILL RANCH Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this __ nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird List of San Bernardino Ranch in Agua Prieta, Sonora, Mexico
    Bird List of San Bernardino Ranch in Agua Prieta, Sonora, Mexico Melinda Cárdenas-García and Mónica C. Olguín-Villa Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico Abstract—Interest and investigation of birds has been increasing over the last decades due to the loss of their habitats, and declination and fragmentation of their populations. San Bernardino Ranch is located in the desert grassland region of northeastern Sonora, México. Over the last decade, restoration efforts have tried to address the effects of long deteriorating economic activities, like agriculture and livestock, that used to take place there. The generation of annual lists of the wildlife (flora and fauna) will be important information as we monitor the progress of restoration of this area. As part of our professional training, during the summer and winter (2011-2012) a taxonomic list of bird species of the ranch was made. During this season, a total of 85 species and 65 genera, distributed over 30 families were found. We found that five species are on a risk category in NOM-059-ECOL-2010 and 76 species are included in the Red List of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). It will be important to continue this type of study in places that are at- tempting restoration and conservation techniques. We have observed a huge change, because of restoration activities, in the lands in the San Bernardino Ranch. Introduction migratory (Villaseñor-Gómez et al., 2010). Twenty-eight of those species are considered at risk on a global scale, and are included in Birds represent one of the most remarkable elements of our en- the Red List of the International Union for Conservation of Nature vironment, because they’re easy to observe and it’s possible to find (IUCN).
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment
    San Bernardino and Leslie Canyon National Wildlife Refuges Comprehensive Management Plan 1995 - 2015 Environmental Assessment U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 2 Albuquerque, New Mexico U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION MEMORANDUM Within the spirit and intent of the Council on Environmental Quality's regulations for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other statutes, orders, and policies that protect fish and wildlife resources, I have established the following administrative record and have determined that the action of: Implementation of a programmatic Comprehensive Management Plan for the San Bernardino and Leslie Canyon National Wildlife Refuges is a categorical exclusion as provided by 516 DM 6, Appendix 1, Section B(4). No further documentation will be made. is found not to have significant environmental effects as determined by the attached Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact. X is found to have special environmental conditions as described in the attached Environmental Assessment. The attached Finding of No Significant Impact will not be fmal nor any actions taken pending a 30-day period for public review (40 CFR 1501.4(e)(2)). is found to have significant effects, and therefore a "Notice of Intent" will be published in the Federal Register to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement before the project is considered further. is denied because of environmental damage, Service policy, or mandate. is an emergency situation. Only those actions necessary to control the immediate impacts of the emergency will be taken. Other related actions remain subject to NEPA review. Other supporting documents: Finding of No Significant Impact, Environmental Assessment for San Bernardino and Leslie Canyon National Wildlife Refuges Comprehensive Management Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Territorial Ranch Houses of Southern Arizona 1663-1912
    Territorial ranch houses of southern Arizona 1863-1912 Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Stewart, Janet Ann, 1925- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 04/10/2021 03:37:57 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/566373 TERRITORIAL RANCH HOUSES OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA 1663-1912 by . Janet Ann Steivart A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ART In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS WITH A MAJOR IN ART HISTORY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 0 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial ful­ fillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permis­ sion for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form 1
    NPS Form 10-900 (3-82) 0MB No. 1024-0018 Expires 10-31-87 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NPS UM only National Register of Historic Places received Inventory Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections____________ 1. Name historic San Bernardino Ranch and or common John H. Slaughter Ranch 2. Location street & number not for publication city, town vicinity of Douglas state Arizona code 04 county Cochise code 003 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use x district public occupied agriculture _ x. museum building(s) private x unoccupied commercial nflrk structure _K_both work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process x yes: restricted government scientific being considered __x yes: unrestricted industrial transportation no military _JL other: iwild life i 4. Owner of Property name See continuation sheet street & number city, town vicinity of state 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Cochise County Courthouse street & number city, town Bisbee state Arizona 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title has this property been determined eligible? yes no date federal __ state county local depository for survey records city, town state 7. Description Condition Check one Check one x excellent deteriorated x unaltered x original site X good x ruins x altered moved date x fair _ x_ unexposed Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance San Bernardino Ranch lies in the San Bernardino Valley, a lowland area of the Sonoran desert well-watered by natural springs.
    [Show full text]
  • Richness of Mammals on the San Bernardino Ranch in the Municipality of Agua Prieta, Sonora, Mexico
    Richness of Mammals on the San Bernardino Ranch in the Municipality of Agua Prieta, Sonora, Mexico Mario Erandi Bonillas-Monge and Carlos Manuel Valdez-Coronel Departamento de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas de la Universidad de Sonora, Sonora, Mexico Abstract—Historically, the San Bernardino Ranch has performed, as economical activities, livestock and farm- ing, which has contributed to the deterioration of regional ecosystems. The ranch is ecologically important due to the diverse types of habitats of conservation interest such as the semi-desert grassland, the riparian vegetation, and a large ciénega, in which restoration efforts are being applied through water harvesting by gabions. Mammals are essential in the ecosystem. Knowing about the actual species that live on the differ- ent sites of the ranch tells us about the healthy state of the environments. We used the direct and indirect sampling methods to identify 26 species of terrestrial mammals on the Ranch. Using this information, we compared the richness and diversity of the ranch species with the species living in the San Bernardino National Wildlife Refuge located next to the border, which was a helpful comparison since the Refuge has more years of restoration experience than does the San Bernardino Ranch. Introduction San Bernardino Ranch is presently located. But with the arrival of the Europeans, the Cienega became a field supporting agricultural crops Due to the biogeographic location, Sonora is in a transition zone and livestock grazing, causing the deterioration of the habitat. This between the Nearctic and Neotropical region, and is considered an area now is part of southeast Arizona and northeast Sonora (Minckley arid region because its large surface is covered by desert shrubs; and others 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior National Park Service
    NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 (March 1992) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES MULTIPLE PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION FORM This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. X New Submission Amended Submission ======================================================================== A. Name of Multiple Property Listing ================================================================================= Cattle Ranching in Arizona, 1540-1950 ======================================================================== B. Associated Historic Contexts ================================================================================= (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) 1. Cattle in the Arizona Economy: An Overview. 2. The Spanish Colonial and Mexican Periods, 1521-1848. 3. The Early American Period, 1848-1880. 4. The Boom Period, 1880-1893. 5. The Foundation of the Modern Cattle Industry, 1893-1950. 6. Indian Cattle Raising: Case Studies of the San Carlos and Tohono O’odham Reservations, 1920-1950. 7. Southern Arizona Ranch House Architectural Context 8. Northern
    [Show full text]
  • San Bernardino/ Leslie Canyon
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service San Bernardino/ Leslie Canyon National Wildlife Refuges “Adjoining the rancho are numerous springs, spreading out into rushy ponds, and giving issue to a small stream of running water.” – William Emory, surveying the U.S./Mexico boundary in 1854 Welcome to the San Bernardino and Leslie Canyon San Bernardino National Wildlife Refuges are located and Leslie Canyon in southeast Arizona’s Cochise National Wildlife County, adjacent to the United Refuges States/Mexico border. This region is characterized by linear mountain ranges separated by broad, flat basins. Relatively recent volcanic activity left numerous volcanic plugs and cinder cones throughout the This blue goose, San Bernardino Valley. Earthquakes designed by J.N. further altered the region and “Ding” Darling, initiated the flow of many springs has become the and seeps. These dynamic geological symbol of the events shaped the valley, creating a National Wildlife picturesque landscape, establishing Refuge System. permanent water sources, and allowing for a variety of plants and animals to flourish here. The San Bernardino Valley once supported permanently flowing creeks, springs, and marshy wetlands. The giant sacaton grassland in the valley was described as “a luxuriant meadow some eight or ten miles long and a mile wide.” The dependable source of water and grass made the area invaluable to fish and wildlife, and a hub of human activity. Rare thrive in Twin Pond at San Bernardino National Wildlife Refuge. Beginning in the late 1800’s, increased human development brought farming, mining, and livestock production to the region, bearing pressure on the precious water. While the area’s extensive wetlands once provided habitat for eight different kinds of native fish, the lowering water table led to severe changes in the habitat and the eventual local extinctions of many species.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranch Life, the Border Country Foreword 1880-1940 the Cowbelles Were Founded October 17, 1939 at a Meeting in the Home of Mrs
    Ranch Life, The Border Country 1880-1940 The Way It Really Was .. _..&.. r J Ranch Life, The Border Country Foreword 1880-1940 The Cowbelles were founded October 17, 1939 at a meeting in the home of Mrs. Ralph Cowan in Douglas. As a result of the informal dinners and dances held in the Ira Glenn Ranch home, Mrs. Will The Way It Really Was Glenn had the idea of forming a social organization to be called The A Pa1-tial Ca.talog of The Cowbelles Collection Cowbelles. Sixteen women elected Mattie Cowan president and Mrs. John Murchison secretary-treasurer at the first meeting. of Historic Ranch Photographs The second Cowbelles group was organized in Willcox in 1946; All Photographic Reproductions by the third in Laveen in 1947. Also in 1947, the Arizona State Cow- Tom Vaughan. Curator of Photography, belles was organized at the annual convention of the American National Cattlemen's Association. The Cowbelles Bisbee Mining and Historical Museum is now a national organization with clubs in thirty states and a member'ship of almost seventy thousand. The Cow belles' Exhibit The pioneers who settled as ranch families learned of neces- Committee, Diana Hadley, sity to st.ick together. Starting simply a social group, the Chairman, with Eva outreach of The Cowbelles. by spreadlng t.o the state and Bradshaw, Betty national levels, shows how closely knit these ranch Choate, Laura Glenn, families have always been: the women-folk are very special. Mary Magoffin, Eve The photographs in this QuaTtl'Tly have been Middleton, Jane Moson, selected from the 135 photos which comprise Allene Taylor and The Cowbelles Photo Exhibit., now touring Lucille Wilbourn, wishes Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranch Life, the Border Country 1880-1940 the Way It Really Was
    Ranch Life, The Border Country 1880-1940 The Way It Really Was .. _..&.. r J Ranch Life, The Border Country Foreword The Cowbelles were founded October 17, 1939 at a meeting in the 1880-1940 home of Mrs. Ralph Cowan in Douglas. As a result of the informal dinners and dances held in the Ira Glenn Ranch home, Mrs. Will The Way It Really Was Glenn had the idea of forming a social organization to be called The A Pa1-tial Ca.talog of The Cowbelles Collection Cowbelles. Sixteen women elected Mattie Cowan president and Mrs. John Murchison secretary-treasurer at the first meeting. of Historic Ranch Photographs The second Cowbelles group was organized in Willcox in 1946; All Photographic Reproductions by the third in Laveen in 1947. Also in 1947, the Arizona State Cow­ Tom Vaughan. Curator of Photography, belles was organized at the annual convention of the American National Cattlemen's Association. The Cowbelles Bisbee Mining and Historical Museum is now a national organization with clubs in thirty states and a member'ship of almost seventy thousand. The Cow belles' Exhibit The pioneers who settled as ranch families learned of neces­ Committee, Diana Hadley, sity to st.ick together. Starting simply a~ a social group, the Chairman, with Eva outreach of The Cowbelles. by spreadlng t.o the state and Bradshaw, Betty national levels, shows how closely knit these ranch Choate, Laura Glenn, families have always been: the women-folk are very special. Mary Magoffin, Eve The photographs in this QuaTtl'Tly have been Middleton, Jane Moson, selected from the 135 photos which comprise Allene Taylor and The Cowbelles Photo Exhibit., now touring Lucille Wilbourn, wishes Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Thiz ZUTVEY Ha Z Been 6UNDED with the Azz,Bstance O6 a Matching
    Thiz zutvey haz been 6unded with the azz,bstance o6 a matching gtant-in-aid Owm the U.S. Depaktment o6 the Intexim, Nationae Pank Senvice, undek the ptovizionz cq the NationaZ Hiztmic Ptezekvation Act o6 1966, az amended, and az adminizteted in Atizona by the Atizona State Pattiz Boand thtough the State Hiztakic Pnesekvation 066icen. A DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES, SAN BERNARDINO RANCH NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK, COCHISE COUNTY, ARIZONA prepared for: Johnson Historical Museum of the Southwest, Inc. Sun City, Arizona prepared by: Lyle M. Stone and James E. Ayres Archaeological Research Services, Inc. Tempe, Arizona August 1982 ABSTRACT Archaeological Research Service, Inc. recently completed an arch- aeological evaluation of a small portion of an early 19th century Mex- ican land grant located near Douglas, Cochise County, Arizona. The San Bernardino Grant property was acquired by Ignacio de Perez in 1822; Perez abandoned the grant in the early 1830's due to Indian hostilities. During the period from the mid-1880's until about 1920 the property was owned by John H. Slaughter, an Anglo rancher and Sheriff of Cochise Coun- ty. The Nature Conservancy acquired the property in 1980 and sub- sequently sold its interest to the U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Johnson Historical Museum of the South- west, Inc. The 131 ac Johnson Museum property includes most of the San Ber- nardino Ranch National Historic Landmark (and National Register of His- toric Places) property, including all of the existing Slaughter Ranch buildings. One of the primary objectives of the Johnson Museum is the long term management (through research, preservation, and interpretive development) of cultural resources which are present on the property.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORIC LANDMARKS Our Annual Look at Some of the State’S Most Iconic Places FEBRUARY 2016
    HISTORIC LANDMARKS Our Annual Look at Some of the State’s Most Iconic Places FEBRUARY 2016 GRAINS SUPREME ESCAPE • EXPLORE • EXPERIENCE The Return of HAYDEN FLOUR — SENECA “Travel and change of place impart place and of change the new mind.” vigor to “Travel Painted Desert Inn, Petrified Forest National Park plus: SAVING A FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT LANDMARK • HIKING THE ARIZONA TRAIL RED ROCK CROSSING • CROWN KING • ESTHER HENDERSON • AVENUE HOTEL B&B Grand Canyon National Park Petrified Forest 46 QUITE WRIGHT National Park February Flagstaff Of the 532 Frank Lloyd Wright designs that were Prescott built, some experts say the David and Gladys Shumway 2016 Wright House in Phoenix is among the 20 most important. Although it had long ago faded from the public imagination, it was thrust into the PHOENIX 2 EDITOR’S LETTER spotlight in 2012, when a developer planned to Organ Pipe Cactus demolish the iconic structure to make way for National Monument Santa Rita CONTRIBUTORS Mountains 3 new homes. That’s when a kid from the neigh- Bisbee borhood stepped in. Rio Rico 4 LETTERS Douglas By Matt Jaffe POINTS OF INTEREST IN THIS ISSUE 5 THE JOURNAL Photographs by Mark Boisclair People, places and things from around the state, includ- ing a look back at iconic photographer Esther Hender- 52 SCENIC DRIVE son; Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument; and the Prescott to Crown King: This scenic drive, which history of Sedona, which at one time was known more begins and ends among towering ponderosa for its orchards than for its gift shops. pines, features a range of ecosystems in between, as well as some interesting Arizona 16 HISTORIC PLACES history.
    [Show full text]