DOCSLIB.ORG

18 September 2001 John Welch White Mountain Apache Tribe Historic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

-.~ "Managing and conserving natural, cultural, and recreational resources" -...~ -....'-­ ~ ,~ 18 September 2001 ~ John Welch ~ White Mountain Apache Tribe Historic Preservation Office Arizona ® State Parks P.O. Box 507 Fort Apache, AZ 85926 Jane Dee Hull RE: Cattle Ranching in Arizona 1540-1950 Governor Multiple Property Documentation Form State Parks Board Members Dear Mr. Welch: Chair Enclosed please find a copy of the Arizona State Historic Preservation Walter D. Armer, Jr. Office's Multiple Property Documentation Form for cattle ranching in Benson Arizona. Our Deputy SHPO for history, Bill Collins, has put this document together based on an historic context report of cattle Vice-Chair ranching in Arizona. This document is designed to facilitate the Suzanne Pfister nomination of historic cattle ranches and associated properties to the Phoenix National Register of Historic Places. Please read through the Joseph H. Holmwood document and contact us if you have any comments. If you do not Mesa wish to comment, please feel free to keep this copy as a resource. Address comments to Bill Collins at the Arizona State Historic John U. Hays Preservation Office via e-mail ([email protected]). regular mail at Yarnell 1300 W. Washington Phoenix, AZ 85007, or telephone at (602) 542- 7159. Elizabeth J. Stewart Tempe Thank you for your interest in historic preservation. For more Vernon Roudebush information about the State Historic Preservation Office or about Safford historic preservation in general, please visit our website at www.pr.state.az.us. If I can help you with anything else, feel free to Michael E. Anable contact me at (602) 542-7136 or e-mail [email protected]. State Land Commissioner Sincerely, Kenneth E. Travous Executive Director Arizona State Parks Christine M. Wahlstrom 1300 W. Washington National Register Coordinator /Historian Phoenix. AZ 85007 Arizona State Historic Preservation Office Tel & TTY: 602.542.4174 www.pr.state.az.us Encl. 800.285.3703 from (520) area code General Fax: 602.542.4180 Director's Office Fax: 602.542.4188 NPS Form 10-900-b OMS No. 1024-0018 (March 1992) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES MULTIPLE PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION FORM This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. X New Submission ___ Amended Submission ====================================================================================== A. Name of Multiple Property Listing ====================================================================================== Cattle Ranching in Arizona. 1540-1950 ====================================================================================== B. Associated Historic Contexts ====================================================================================== (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) 1. Cattle in the Arizona Economy: An Overview. 2. The Spanish Colonial and Mexican Periods, 1521-1848. 3. The Pioneer Cattle Industry, 1848-1880. 4. The Boom Years, 1880-1891. 5. Foundation of the Modern Cattle Industry, 1891-1950. 6. Indian Cattle Raising: Case Studies of the San Carlos and Tohono O'odham Reservations, 1920-1950. 7. Southern Arizona Ranch House Architectural Context 8. Northern Arizona Vernacular Log Buildings Architectural Context 9. Windmills Design Architectural Context 10. Barbed Wire Fencing and Cattle Guard Design Architectural Context 11. Pre-Inventory of Cattle Ranches in Northern Arizona -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- C. Form Prepared by ====================================================================================== name/title ____-.!W~ill~ia~m~S:.:,.. ~C""o.!.!.!lIi.;_:.ns><J!'-'-P'-'-h.!!..D=:..... ________---:--:--~---~--:- ________ - street & number ___1~3::.::0:.!'0'-'W:.,:-:-. W~a::::s.!,.!;hi:.:....:n.;::Lgt=o.:...:.n __________telephone (602) 542-7159 city or town Phoenix state AZ zip code 85007 ====================================================================================== D. Certification ====================================================================================== As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation. L See continuation sheet for addi!ional comments.) Signature and title of certifying official Date State or Federal agency and bureau I hereby certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register. Signature of the Keeper Date ========================================================================================== ' Table of Contents for Written Narrative ==========================================--=============================================== Provide the following information on continuation sheets. Cite the letter and the title before each section of the narrative. Assign page numbers according to the instructions for continuation sheets in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Fill in page numbers for each section in the space below. [to be completed in final draft] ========================================================================================= E. Statement of Historic Contexts (Document historic contexts on one or more continuation sheets. If more than one historic context is documented, present them in sequential order.) ========================================================================================= See continuation sheets. ======================================================================================== F. Associated Property Types (Provide description, significance, and registration requirements on one or more continuation sheets.) ======================================================================================== See continuation sheets ========================================================================================= G. Geographical Data ======================================================================--================== Acreage of Property ____ UTM References (Place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet) Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing 1 3 2 4 ___ See continuation sheet. Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.) Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected on a continuation sheet.) ========================================================================================== H. Summary of Identification and Evaluation Methods (Discuss the methods used in developing the multiple property listing on one or more continuation sheets.) ========================================================================================== See continuation sheets ========================================================================================== I. Major Bibliographical References (List major written works and primary location of additional documentation: State Historic Preservation Office, other State agency, Federal agency, local government, university, or other, specifying repository.) ========================================================================================== Bibliography (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets.) Previous documentation on file (NPS) __ preliminary determination of individual listing (36 CFR 67) has been requested. __ previously listed in the National Register __ previously determined eligible by the National Register __ designated a National Historic Landmark __ recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey # -::--____ __ recorded by Historic American Engineering Record # ____ Primary Location of Additional Data: X State Historic Preservation Office X Other State agency __ Federal agency __ Local government __ University ~_.Other Name of repository Arizona State Department of Librarv. Archives, and Public Records • I I I I I NPS Fonn 10-900a OMS No. 1024·0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section _-=E=--- Page _...!.1 __ Cattle Ranching in Arizona, 1848-1950 Name of Multiple Property Listing ============================================================================================ Branding a calf. Arizona State Library, Archives and Public Records, History and Archives Division. CATTLE IN THE ARIZONA ECONOMY: AN OVERVIEW In 1992, the federal agricultural census counted nearly 930,000 head of cattle in Arizona. These animals are a highly visible presence on the rural landscape. Though widely dispersed, they are
Recommended publications
  • SPRING HILL RANCH Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service______National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

    SPRING HILL RANCH Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service______National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) 0MB No. 1024-0018 SPRING HILL RANCH Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service_______________________________ National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: Spring Hill Ranch Other Name/Site Number: Deer Park Place; Davis Ranch; Davis-Noland-Merrill Grain Company Ranch; Z Bar Ranch 2. LOCATION Street & Number: North of Strong City on Kansas Highway 177 Not for publication: City/Town: Strong City Vicinity: X State: Kansas County: Chase Code: 017 Zip Code: 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: X Building(s): __ Public-Local: __ District: X Public-State: __ Site: __ Public-Federal: Structure: __ Object: _ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 8 _1_ buildings __ sites _5_ structures _ objects 14 12 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 2 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing :N/A Designated a NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK on NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) 0MB No 1024-0018 SPRING HILL RANCH Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this __ nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
  • Hydrology and Geomorphology of the Santa Maria and Big Sandy Rivers and Burro Creek, Western Arizona

    Hydrology and Geomorphology of the Santa Maria and Big Sandy Rivers and Burro Creek, Western Arizona

    Hydrology and Geomorphology of the Santa Maria and Big Sandy Rivers and Burro Creek, Western Arizona By Jeanne E. Klawon Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-02 March, 2000 Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress, Suite #100, Tucson, Arizona 85701 46 p. text Investigations supported by the Arizona State Land Department As part of their efforts to gather technical information for stream navigability assessments Investigations done in cooperation with JE Fuller Hydrology / Geomorphology Hydrology and Geomorphology of the Santa Maria and Big Sandy Rivers and Burro Creek, Western Arizona by Jeanne E. Klawon Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report provides hydrologic and geomor- than 10 cfs. Flood events are dramatic in phologic information to aid in the evaluation of comparison. Historical peak flow estimates for the navigability of the Big Sandy River, Santa these rivers have been estimated at 68,700 Maria River, and Burro Creek. These streams cubic feet per second (cfs) (2/9/93) for the Big flow through rugged mountainous terrain of Sandy River, 47,400 cfs (2/14/80) for Burro Mohave, Yavapai, and La Paz counties in Creek, and 23,100 cfs (3/1/78) for the Santa western Arizona and join to form the Bill Maria River. The largest flow events have Williams River at what is now Alamo Dam occurred during the winter months when and Reservoir. The rivers reflect a diversity of meteorological conditions cause a series of channel patterns, and include the mainly wide storms to pass through the region, frequently and braided sandy alluvial channels of the Big generating multiple floods within a given year.
  • Bird List of San Bernardino Ranch in Agua Prieta, Sonora, Mexico

    Bird List of San Bernardino Ranch in Agua Prieta, Sonora, Mexico

    Bird List of San Bernardino Ranch in Agua Prieta, Sonora, Mexico Melinda Cárdenas-García and Mónica C. Olguín-Villa Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico Abstract—Interest and investigation of birds has been increasing over the last decades due to the loss of their habitats, and declination and fragmentation of their populations. San Bernardino Ranch is located in the desert grassland region of northeastern Sonora, México. Over the last decade, restoration efforts have tried to address the effects of long deteriorating economic activities, like agriculture and livestock, that used to take place there. The generation of annual lists of the wildlife (flora and fauna) will be important information as we monitor the progress of restoration of this area. As part of our professional training, during the summer and winter (2011-2012) a taxonomic list of bird species of the ranch was made. During this season, a total of 85 species and 65 genera, distributed over 30 families were found. We found that five species are on a risk category in NOM-059-ECOL-2010 and 76 species are included in the Red List of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). It will be important to continue this type of study in places that are at- tempting restoration and conservation techniques. We have observed a huge change, because of restoration activities, in the lands in the San Bernardino Ranch. Introduction migratory (Villaseñor-Gómez et al., 2010). Twenty-eight of those species are considered at risk on a global scale, and are included in Birds represent one of the most remarkable elements of our en- the Red List of the International Union for Conservation of Nature vironment, because they’re easy to observe and it’s possible to find (IUCN).
  • Environmental Assessment

    Environmental Assessment

    San Bernardino and Leslie Canyon National Wildlife Refuges Comprehensive Management Plan 1995 - 2015 Environmental Assessment U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 2 Albuquerque, New Mexico U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION MEMORANDUM Within the spirit and intent of the Council on Environmental Quality's regulations for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other statutes, orders, and policies that protect fish and wildlife resources, I have established the following administrative record and have determined that the action of: Implementation of a programmatic Comprehensive Management Plan for the San Bernardino and Leslie Canyon National Wildlife Refuges is a categorical exclusion as provided by 516 DM 6, Appendix 1, Section B(4). No further documentation will be made. is found not to have significant environmental effects as determined by the attached Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact. X is found to have special environmental conditions as described in the attached Environmental Assessment. The attached Finding of No Significant Impact will not be fmal nor any actions taken pending a 30-day period for public review (40 CFR 1501.4(e)(2)). is found to have significant effects, and therefore a "Notice of Intent" will be published in the Federal Register to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement before the project is considered further. is denied because of environmental damage, Service policy, or mandate. is an emergency situation. Only those actions necessary to control the immediate impacts of the emergency will be taken. Other related actions remain subject to NEPA review. Other supporting documents: Finding of No Significant Impact, Environmental Assessment for San Bernardino and Leslie Canyon National Wildlife Refuges Comprehensive Management Plan.
  • General Crook's Administration in Arizona, 1871-75

    General Crook's Administration in Arizona, 1871-75

    General Crook's administration in Arizona, 1871-75 Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Bahm, Linda Weldy Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 29/09/2021 11:58:29 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/551868 GENERAL CROOK'S ADMINISTRATION IN ARIZONA, 1871-75 by Linda Weldy Bahm A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 6 6 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fu lfill ment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for per­ mission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: J/{ <— /9 ^0 JOHN ALEXANDER CARROLL ^ T 5 ite Professor of History PREFACE In the four years following the bloody attack on an Indian encampment by a Tucson posse early in 1871, the veteran professional soldier George Crook had primary responsibility for the reduction and containment of the "hostile" Indians of the Territory of Arizona.
  • Visit Cochise Country Where Even JOHNNY REB Got a Taste of Apache Vengeance

    Visit Cochise Country Where Even JOHNNY REB Got a Taste of Apache Vengeance

    Backpack a Dizzying Descent to the Colorado River arizonahighways.com SEPTEMBER 2004 Visit Cochise Country Where Even JOHNNY REB Got a Taste of Apache Vengeance Drop in on Kingman A Family Place view the Little Colorado River Primeval Splendor Boy-artist Phenom of the Navajos {also inside} SEPTEMBER 2004 46 DESTINATION S an Jose de Tumacacori Mission Some 300 years ago, the mission was a “community” amid turmoil and danger in a primitive land, now southern Arizona. 42 BACK ROAD ADVENTURE COVER/HISTORY PORTFOLIO 34 Northwest of Prescott, a winding route takes visitors to Ambushed by Apaches 20 A Cool, Moist Mountain Place remnants of classic ranch country around Camp Wood. In 1862, Confederate soldiers may have overreached A photographer finds primeval beauty and tranquility 48 HIKE OF THE MONTH for territory into Arizona, where some fell during a along the West Fork of the Little Colorado River. A pleasant journey in the Huachuca Mountains turns a surprise attack by Indians at Dragoon Springs. rattlesnake encounter into a happy-go-lucky memory. FOCUS ON NATURE 2 LETTERS & E-MAIL Rider Navajo Indian ADVENTURE 32 Grand Canyon Canyon Reservation 6 Tracking the Tiger Rattlesnake 3 TAKING THE National Park Rim-to-River Trek Reclusive most of the time, this Sonoran Desert OFF-RAMP Camp Two hardy Grand Canyon backpackers pick their way species gets all worked up and on the move when it’s KINGMAN 40 HUMOR Wood through rocky and difficult Rider Canyon to reach an time to find a mate. West Fork of the isolated, historic spot on the Colorado River.
  • Historic Preservation Master Plan

    Historic Preservation Master Plan

    HISTORIC PRESERVATION MASTER PLAN This Column of the Master Plan INTRODUCTION AND will be Used to Highlight Photo­ graphs of Historic Resources. HISTORIC PRESERVATION OVERVIEW Chapter One Contains Buildings Identified in the 1978 Multiple Resource Area (MRA) Nomina­ 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION MASTER PLAN tion to the National Register of Historic Places. 1.1.1 Introduction This Historic Preservation Master Plan is a guide and outline for the identi­ fication, protection, and management of historic resources within the City of Prescott, Arizona. It is intended to serve as a basic operational tool to as­ sist the City, the Preservation Commission, and the public in understanding and applying preservation principals to our historic areas. The plan pro­ vides a descriptive overview of preservation in general, and the resources of Prescott in particular, and outlines the philosophical goals and recom­ mendations for preservation and development. Essential to the plan is an analysis of each existing National and Local Preservation District. This analysis includes the identification of the essen­ tial character of each district, including potential impacts to that character that should be addressed. These impacts include zoning regulations, traf­ fic, parking, land use, vacant property, and other planning factors. Another essential element of the plan is the identification of areas within Prescott that may be candidates for National or Local Preservation District status, and a plan and prioritization for the documentation of these
  • Representing History

    Representing History

    Representing History The Pianist To Kill A King Why use film? History is currently `in vogue’ with the media. Documentaries cover the five terrestrial channels, historical non-fiction tops the best selling charts and Simon Schama, Michael Wood and David Starkey are now superstar presenters. Time Team and Restoration positively encourage us to take a `hands on’ approach – we can now affect what happens to our heritage directly. Historical films are also as popular as ever, with Pirates of the Caribbean currently topping the UK Box Office (although historians may argue exactly which historical period it is from!) and there are still many costume drama classics that draw in audiences across the world. Films that attempt to show history are sometimes derided by historians and critics for their lack of accuracy and sometimes hilariously bad casting - John Wayne as Genghis Khan anyone? However, if we view historical films as documents to begin an investigation, and if we look at how the film itself works, as well as examining how it purports to tell us about the past, the result can be a rewarding and enjoyable journey. A film can capture a feeling for a time; can create a mood and a picture of the past that perhaps, with further historical research and examination of the other contemporary art forms (drama, literature, painting, music etc.) can make that world come to life. © Film Education 2003 1 Curriculum Links The case study films below have been chosen both for their specific links to historical topics but also because of their filmic interest, either as a new take on a particular subject or an innovative way of telling a story.
  • United States Department of the Interior U.S

    United States Department of the Interior U.S

    United States Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021-4951 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 FAX: (602) 242-2513 In Reply Refer To: AESO/SE 2-21-01-F-241 December 14, 2001 Memorandum To: Field Manager, Kingman Field Office, Bureau of Land Management, Kingman, Arizona From: Field Supervisor Subject: Biological Opinion for the proposed prescribed burn program within the Kingman Field Office boundaries - Pine Lake Wildland/Urban Interface This document transmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (Service) biological opinion based on our review of the proposed implementation of a prescribed fire program within land administered by the Kingman Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), located in Mohave and east Yavapai counties, Arizona, and its effects on the Hualapai Mexican vole (Microtus mexicanus hualpaiensis) in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act), as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Your March 14, 2001, request for formal consultation was received on March 16, 2001. This biological opinion is based on information provided in the biological evaluation attached to the March 14, 2001, request for consultation; additional information provided by the BLM via electronic mail; the April 18, 2001, field investigation; telephone conversations; and other sources of information. A complete administrative record of this consultation is on file at this office. Consultation History The Service received BLM’s March 14, 2001, request for formal consultation on March 16, 2001. The request included the “Biological Evaluation: Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Prescribed Fire” (BE).
  • A History of Tonto National Monument Nancy L

    A History of Tonto National Monument Nancy L

    Western National Parks Association Tucson, Arizona At the Confluence of Change: A History of Tonto National Monument Nancy L. Dallett Western National Parks Association Tucson, Arizona Copyright© 2008 by Nancy L. Dallett Published by Western National Parks Association The net proceeds from WNPA publications support educational and research programs in the national parks. To receive a free catalogue, featuring hundreds of publications, email: [email protected] or visit our online store at www.wnpa.org. Written by Nancy L. Dallett Edited by Melissa Urreiztieta Designed by Simpson & Convent Cover photograph: Lower Cliff Dwelling by Adriel Heisey Printed by Friesens Printed in Canada contents List of Illustrations 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction 1 1 Chapter One: Reclamation. Conservation, and Preservation: Three Currents Converge 17 Chapter Tw-a: One Land, Many Peoples 45 Chapter Three: The Early Years of Tonto National Monument: The Forest Service Era, 1807-1833 67 Chapter Four: The National Park Service Takes Over, 1 833-1 853 87 Chapter Five: A Time of Transition: Mission· BB, 1854-1866 147 Chapter Six: Taking Control: Fences, Science, and Surveys, 1867-1885 171 6 • CONTENTS Chapter Seven: Reclamation, Conservation, and Preservation Revisited: A Mission F.leborn, 1 BBB-2006 1 81 Epilogue 221 Appendix A: American Antiquities Act 223 Appendix B: Tonto National Monument Proclamations 225 Appendix C: Tonto National Monument Custodians and Superintendents 229 Appendix C: Tonto National Monument Visitors Per Year 231 References 233 Index 247 illustrations
  • Prehistory of the Sonoran Desert in West Central Arizona

    Prehistory of the Sonoran Desert in West Central Arizona

    BLM LIBRARY 88022060 ND MANAGEMENT ARIZONA Deceptive Desolation: Prehistory of the Sonoran Desert in West Central Arizona Connie L. Stone CULTURAL RESOURCE SERIES No. 1 1986 BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT ARIZONA CULTURAL RESOURCE SERIES No. 1 Deceptive Desolation: Prehistory of the Sonoran Desert in West Central Arizona . Connie L. Stone (1986) No. 2 The Archaeology of Southeast Arizona: A Class I Cultural Resource Inventory . Gordon Bronitsky and James D. Merritt (1986) No. 3 A Ground Stone Implement Quarry on the Lover Colorado River , Northwestern Arizona. Bruce B. Huckell (1986) Bureau of Land Management Arizona State Office Post Office Box 16365 3707 North 7th Street Phoenix, Arizona 85011 fr e< Deceptive Desolation: Prehistory of the Sonoran Desert in West Central Arizona by Connie L. Stone Cultural Resource Series Monograph No. 1 Published by the Arizona State Office of the Bureau of Land Management 3707 N. 7th Street Phoenix, Arizona 85014 October 1986 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In a sense, this volume represents the combined effort of all initiated the Cultural Resource Series of publications and archaeologists who have worked in the west central desert. provided overall support and labor in editing and paste-up. Informal conversations with many of these individuals The editing skills and assistance of Jane Closson, State have enhanced the final product. Special thanks go to Office Writer/Editor, were an important contribution. Mary Barger, Phoenix District Archaeologist for the Karen Daniels of the Phoenix District Office assisted in the Bureau of Land Management, who painstakingly reviewed final production. District employees Wanda Johnson and the voluminous draft. Todd Bostwick commented on por- LucieAnn Gliosci typed tables.
  • 2013 Historical Archaeology Research Guide

    2013 Historical Archaeology Research Guide

    HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY IN ARIZONA A Research Guide Compiled by James E. Ayres, Carol Griffith, and Teresita Majewski With Contributions by The Historical Archaeology Advisory Committee, Thomas Jones and Archaeological Consulting Services, Ltd. Sixth Revised Edition, June 2013 State Historic Preservation Office 1300 West Washington Street Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Arizona State Parks Board Chair Walter D. Armer, Jr. Alan Everett Vail Sedona R. J. Cardin Mark Brnovich Phoenix Phoenix Larry Landry Vanessa Hickman Phoenix State Land Commissioner Kay Daggett Bryan Martyn Sierra Vista Executive Director This document is available on the Arizona State Parks website – http://AZStateParks.com . This document is available in alternative formats by contacting the ADA Coordinator at (602) 542-7152. This revision has been completed under the Historical Archaeology Advisory Committee, a program of the Governor’s Advisory Archaeology Commission. This document was printed with Historic Preservation Fund grant money allocated to the Arizona State Historic Preservation Office from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504.of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, or handicap in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire information, please write: Office of Equal Opportunity, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240. i The Historical Archaeology Advisory Committee The Governor’s Archaeology Advisory Commission (GAAC) has recently reestablished the Historical Archaeology Advisory Committee (HAAC), which heretofore functioned as an independent advisory committee under the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO).