Powering Potential Enhancing Experiences Delivering Success 2020-2032
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Athletics Inclusive April - June 2021
ATHLETICS INCLUSIVE APRIL - JUNE 2021 Welcome to the second edition of the quarterly equality, diversity and inclusion news from UK Athletics, Athletics Northern Ireland, England Athletics, Scottish Athletics and Welsh Athletics. PARA INCLUSION Welsh Athletics As part of our ongoing commitment to closer working with Disability Sport Wales [DSW], Welsh Athletics is in the process of recruiting a jointly funded Para Athletics Pathway Coordinator. We have seen great recent success at the European Para-athletics Championships with a total of 7 medals from Welsh Athletes and we hope this joint working will continue and build on this success as the organisation become more closely integrated. The role will support the development and progression of Para Athletes within the Athletics Pathway (from community through to performance) as identified by Disability Sport Wales and Welsh Athletics. It will aim to ensure that all Para Athletes within the pathway have access to appropriate and meaningful community opportunities to support individual needs. There will also be mentoring and upskilling outreach support for athletes, coaches, clubs and key contacts in collaboration with the DSW Performance Pathway Team and WA. This is an exciting opportunity in a role which will be fully integrated into the Welsh Athletics Performance team at the start of preparations for the Birmingham 2022 Games. Scottish Athletics With athletics training returning across the country, a Safe Return to Training guide has been produced for wheelchair and frame running to remind athletes, coaches and clubs of the extra safety considerations. The guidance highlights equipment checks, how to minimise risks, training safely on the track and training safely on the road. -
Rule 15: National Federations Obligations
RULE 15: NATIONAL FEDERATIONS OBLIGATIONS LIST OF CATEGORISED NATIONAL MEMBER FEDERATIONS Category A – 7 Member Federations COUNTRY CODE MEMBER FEDERATION AREA ASSOC. Bahrain BRN Bahrain Athletics Association AAA Belarus BLR Belarus Athletic Federation EA Ethiopia ETH Ethiopian Athletic Federation CAA Kenya KEN Athletics Kenya CAA Morocco MAR Fédération Royale Marocaine d’Athlétisme CAA Nigeria NGR Athletic Federation of Nigeria CAA Ukraine UKR Ukrainian Athletic Federation EA 1st Floor, 6 Quai Antoine 1er, MC 98007 Monaco • T +33 1 85 64 22 50 Category B – 51 Member Federations COUNTRY CODE MEMBER FEDERATION AREA ASSOC. Algeria ALG Fédération Algérienne d'Athlétisme CAA Australia AUS Athletics Australia OAA Bahamas BAH Bahamas Association of Athletic Associations NACAC Belgium BEL Ligue Royale Belge d'Athlétisme EA Botswana BOT Botswana Athletics Association CAA Brazil BRA Confederação Brasileira de Atletismo CONSUDATLE Bulgaria BUL Bulgarian Athletic Federation EA Canada CAN Athletics Canada NACAC China CHN Chinese Athletic Association AAA Colombia COL Federacion Colombiana de Atletismo CONSUDATLE Cote d'Ivoire CIV Fédération Ivoirienne d'Athlétisme CAA Croatia CRO Croatian Athletics Federation EA Cuba CUB Federacion Cubana de Atletismo NACAC Czech Republic CZE Czech Athletic Federation EA Dominican Republic DOM Federacion Dominicana de Asociaciones de Atletismo NACAC Eritrea ERI Eritrean National Athletics Federation CAA Estonia EST Estonian Athletic Association EA Finland FIN Suomen Urheiluliitto RY EA France FRA Fédération Française -
Stakeholder Consultation
Final Report Stakeholder consultation January 2015 CONTENTS Contents ..................................................................................................................... 2 About UK Sport ............................................................................................................ 9 Core responsibilities ................................................................................................ 9 Overview ................................................................................................................... 11 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 11 The purpose of consultation ................................................................................... 11 This report ............................................................................................................. 11 Methodology .......................................................................................................... 12 Defining the stakeholder universe .......................................................................... 13 Executive summary .................................................................................................... 14 Participant profile ...................................................................................................... 17 Stakeholder workshops .......................................................................................... 17 Written submissions .............................................................................................. -
Consultation on the Formal Membership of UK Athletics
England Athletics Athletics House Alexander Stadium Stadium Way Walsall Road, Perry Barr Birmingham B42 2BE Tel: 0121 347 6543 www.englandathletics.org Consultation on the Formal Membership of UK Athletics Information for England Athletics Affiliated Clubs and Member Bodies Dear Club Secretary, In November 2020, together with the other three Home Country Athletics Federations (HCAFs) and UK Athletics (UKA), we announced a new 12-year strategy for athletics and running across the whole of the UK. Alongside this new strategy, reflecting our shared commitment to a collaborative approach, the five organisations have established a new partnership framework that includes new approaches to ways of working across the organisations to develop athletics across the UK, to create alignment, to make the best use of resources, and to ensure there is accountability for the delivery of the strategy. As part of the changes to its governance, the UK Athletics Annual General Meeting on 11 December 2020 passed several resolutions to amend its Articles of Association to enable each HCAF to nominate a director to the UK Athletics Board. This change has now been implemented giving the Board of England Athletics the ability to appoint a director to the Board of UK Athletics. Experienced official and club volunteer, Peter Crawshaw, has agreed to fulfil this role. England Athletics has had a position for UK Athletics on its Board since its inception and is delighted that this has now been filled by Anne Wafula-Strike. Membership structure of UK Athletics It was agreed at the UK Athletics AGM in December that, in accordance with the recommendations of the external Review of UK Athletics (the Street Report), detailed proposals would be formulated to enable formal consultation with the Sport on the future legal membership of UK Athletics, formerly known as the UK Members Council (UKMC), now known as UKA Members. -
Competitive School Sport Summary Report
National Governing Bodies of Sport Survey Competitive School Sport Summary Report June 2014 Prepared by the TOP Foundation for Ofsted SportPark, Loughborough University, 3 Oakwood Drive, Loughborough, LE11 3QF NGB Competitive School Sport Investigation Summary Report Executive Summary In the spring of 2014 an investigation commissioned by Ofsted explored the school backgrounds, ethnicity and socioeconomic status of some of our best adult and age group international sport teams. The same investigation asked 29 National Governing Bodies of sport (NGBs) to report on their competitive school sport provision in 39 different sports; 26 (90%) NGBs agreed to take part and they reported on 35 sports. This NGBs report is part of a wider investigation being undertaken by Ofsted into competitive school sport for Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills (HMCI), Sir Michael Wilshaw, which includes a supporting report with input from headteachers. This investigation collated 6 different sets of data on the known school backgrounds of: i. Current international representatives from 14 sports (n=224) ii. London 2012 Olympic Team (n=279) iii. London 2012 Paralympic Team (n=106) iv. Players competing in national leagues in 5 sports (n=543) v. UK Sport’s Athlete Insights Survey: Olympic sports (n=606) vi. UK Sport’s Athlete Insights Survey: Paralympic sports (n=247). Analysis showed similar trends across the different data sets. The 2 Paralympic data sets provided a mean of 81% for athletes attending state schools only, 13% for independent schools only and 3% for both types of school. The 2 Olympic data sets provided a mean of 66% for athletes attending state schools only, 22% for independent schools only and 6% for both types of school. -
Couch 2 5K Leader Requirements As a Result of the Increase in Recreational Running As Well As Participation Running Initiatives
Couch 2 5K Leader Requirements As a result of the increase in recreational running as well as participation running initiatives such as ‘Couch 2 5K’ programmes being delivered by clubs, community groups and external agencies across the UK there is a need for a clear set of guidelines regarding coach/leader requirements to deliver such programmes. To become a participation running group leader, you need to have completed one of following UK Athletics courses/qualifications delivered by Athletics NI or an alternative Home Country Governing body (England Athletics, Welsh Athletics, Scottish Athletics): ● Leadership in Running Fitness (LiRF-available in all home countries) ● Jog Scotland - ‘Jog leader’ (available only in Scotland) ● Coach in Running Fitness (CiRF-available in all home countries) ● Athletics Coach (or legacy UKA Level 2 and above) **Equivalent IAAF qualifications are also recognised. Athletics NI offer a range of coaching qualifications accredited by British Athletics that provide leaders, assistants and coaches with insurance cover in the case of an accident. (http://www.britishathletics.org.uk/governance/insurance/) Individuals who successfully complete these awards and return a clear Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) check (known as AccessNI in Northern Ireland) are issued with a British Athletics leadership/coaching license. This insures them to operate within the limitations of this license, which varies depending on the award undertaken. If you're just starting out as a run leader in Northern Ireland, the Leadership in Running Fitness qualification is the course for you. You will learn essential health and safety for leading a group run, how to structure running sessions appropriate to the level of your runners (including warm-ups, cool-downs and stretches), and how to plan suitable routes. -
UK Athletics and the Home Country Governing Bodies
UK Athletics and the Home Country Governing Bodies Child Safeguarding Policy Policy Owner: UKA Lead Safeguarding Officer Policy approved by: The Boards of UKA and the Home Country Affiliated Federations Date Policy approved: 31/01/2021 Next review Date: 01/02/2021 Version: WASG03.0 Child Safeguarding Policy Last reviewed: November 2020 Policy owner: James Williams, CEO Approved by: Board Audience: All 1 Contents: Section 1. Child Safeguarding Policy. ...................................................................................................... 3 Policy Objectives: ................................................................................................................................ 3 Policy Statement: ................................................................................................................................ 4 Application: ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Definition of a child: ............................................................................................................................ 5 Key Principles: ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Implementation: ................................................................................................................................. 6 Equality: ............................................................................................................................................. -
British Athletics Handhook 1974
British Athletics Handhook 1974 I I I I Published by THE BRITISH AMATEUR ATHLETIC BOARD 75 P I ChooseApollo and youwon't throwawayyour chances ofwinning Athletes rely on consistent performance •from their equipment and that’s exactly what Apollo javelins provide. Manufactured by the most experienced precision tube manufacturers in the U.K., these javelins are the product of a continuous programme of research and development. Exhaustive field trials by top javelin coaches, wind tunnel experiments and gun tests are constantly being evaluated in order to improve performancestill furtherso that athletes can achieve better distances. Throw after throw. With three ranges to choose from, there's an Apollo javelin to suit every athlete. The new Aerotrainer is ideal for beginners who.want to get the feel of a real javelin. For more experienced throwers, the next step up is the Aeroflo. And for top flight internationals, only the distance rated Aerodyne D.R. is good enough. In other events too, Apollo starting blocks, relay batons, vaulting poles and jumping laths bring out the best in every athlete. So cnoose Apollo equipment-it’s a winner everytime. ACCUES+POLLOCK A member ol the world-wide STEELTUBE DIVISION The secret of your success. Accles & Pollock Ltd., Sporting Goods Division, Oldbury, Warley, Worcestershire.Telephone: 021-5521500.Telex: 33247. British Athletics Handbook 1974 BRITISH AMATEUR ATHLETIC BOARD 70 Brompton Road. London. SW3 IEE. Photo by kindpermission of ‘THE SCOTSMAN'. TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages Section 1 7-24 British Amateur Athletic Board. Section 2 27-36 Records. Section 3 41 -70 International Meetings in 1973. -
MAKE IT OFFICIAL BRITISH ATHLETICS’ OFFICIALS STRATEGY 2016 - 2020 Niels De Vos, CHIEF EXECUTIVE, UK ATHLETICS
MAKE IT OFFICIAL BRITISH ATHLETICS’ OFFICIALS STRATEGY 2016 - 2020 Niels de Vos, CHIEF EXECUTIVE, UK ATHLETICS The importance of technical officials to the growth of athletics is impossible to overstate. Put simply, without officials there would be no British Athletics competition for athletes to take part in. From major international events such as London 2012, Glasgow 2014 and the upcoming World Championships in 2017 through to local leagues, from the London Marathon As athletes we rely on officials to and Great Run series to mountain, fell and cross country events, it is the 23/03/1983NIELS DE VOS, CHIEF Nike,EXECUTIVE, Beaverton UK ATHLETICS validate our performances. Officials keep commitment and expertise of UK Athletics (UKA) licensed officials that makes Mogadishu, Somalia Alberto Salazar the events operating professionally and all thesePortland, possible. USA Pace Sports Events that are prioritised by either DCMS or UK Sport will be invited to discuss the potential smoothly. Their important role should “Oregon Project, Newham Management UK &Athletics, Essexrange Beagles of alongside UK-level its support Home Country availableNike partners, from across is committed Government. to the Prior to this it will be important never be forgotten in the uncompromising recruitment,to evidence training, the development feasibility of andthe supportevent and of officials.provide a robust headline assessment that the event environment of competition. This documentis deliverable sets outand our affordable. strategic prioritiesIn some forcases the this next willfour be straightforward – particularly However as athletes we really appreciate years towhen ensure the we event support (or similar) our technical has been officials staged and in theprovide UK the previously. -
Welsh Athletics Milestones
Welsh Athletics Milestones Recalled by Clive Williams 1860 John Chambers holds a sports meeting at Hafod House, Aberystwyth - probably the first record of an athletics meeting being held in Wales 1865 Chambers organises “athletic sports” at Aberystwyth. 1865 William Richards, born in “Glamorgan” sets a world record for the mile with 4 mins. 17 ¼ seconds. 1871 St. David’s College Lampeter and Llandovery College hold athletics “sports” meetings. 1875 Newport Athletic Club formed and holds “athletic sports.” 1877 Cardiff-born William Gale achieves the phenomenal deed of walking 1,500 miles in 1,000 hours. He was the world’s leading pedestrian. 1879 Llanfair Caereinion Powys-born George Dunning sets a world 40 miles record at Stamford Bridge of 4:50.12. 1880 Newport AC represented by Richard Mullock at the formation of the AAA at The Randolph Hotel, Oxford - Chambers also there. 1881 Dunning effectively sets an inaugural world record for the half-marathon when he runs 1:13.46 on a track at Stamford Bridge. The distance is actually 13 miles 440 yards, i.e. further than the designated half marathon distance of 13 miles 192.5 yards. 1881 Dunning becomes the first Welsh born athlete to win the (English) National cross country title. 1882 Roath (Cardiff) Harriers formed. They amalgamated with Birchgrove (Cardiff) Harriers in 1968 to form Cardiff AAC.1890. 1890 Will Parry, born in Buttington, near Welshpool wins the (English) National cross country title for a third successive year. 1890: St. Asaph-born Norman David Morgan wins the AAA 100 yards title during his residence in Ireland. -
Register of Athletic Resources/Materials
REGISTER OF ATHLETIC RESOURCES/MATERIALS NATIONAL UNION OF TRACK STATISTICIANS HISTORICAL GROUP Chris Holloway (January 2014) DRAFT No. 4 Introduction At the 2013 meeting of the Historical Group of the National Union Of Track Statisticians (NUTS) I volunteered to draft up and maintain a register of resource materials that may be of use to researchers active within our sport. They may be engaged in work on their own club, a specific athlete, a general aspect of the sport or a governing body. They may be from outside the sport but are looking at our sport and its contribution to their area of interest. The current content is meant as illustrative and not definitive. The maintainer of the “register” should be just that. I do not see them acting as the “researcher” to investigate and provide the detailed content of an entry. This must come from others and have provenance. It will be down to you the reader to help this register get populated. The exact format and content of information held will evolve and will need to be refined regularly. What Do I Want You To Do? In this draft you will find a number of things in italics and highlighted in yellow. This is where I want your specific input and contribution. The biggest compliment will be if you respond and tear it apart but also provide additions & corrections! This document is a crude ‘start’. I want you to read it and spot all errors/typos/omissions/duplications etc and report them to me. Action Date Printed : 03/01/2014 File : CNH - NUTS RESOURCE REGISTER.DOC Page : 1 I welcome any suggestions both to the information to be maintained and to any collections that you are aware of not mentioned. -
Download the Background and Timeline Insert
HUMAN “They’re Chasing Us Away RIGHTS from Sport” WATCH Human Rights Violations in Sex Testing of Elite Women Athletes 19301930ss 19401940s-1950s-1950s s Unsubstantiated stories of men Systematic sex testing, of a sort, exists as early as masquerading as women in international the 1940s via identity cards and “certificates of sporting events first appear.i femininity,” with the IAAF and IOC requiring all female athletes who wish to register for an event to provide a physician letter attesting to their sex for eligibility purposes.ii Meeting of the Executive Committee of the International Olympic Committee in 1951 in Vienna, chaired by IOC President Edström. © 1951 ullstein bild via Getty Images BACKGROUND You have to sacrifice so much, especially us ladies. —C.M., athlete, November 12, 2019 The regulation of women’s participation in sport via “sex testing” dates back decades. A key architect of such regulations—a former official with the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and World Athletics—later went on to characterize previous testing regimes as a “systematic violation for which the world of sport must take respon- sibility,” and “a decades-long example of sexual harassment of sexual abuse within sport [and] a flagrant abuse.”13 The earliest attempts at “sex testing” that sports authorities instituted in the 1940s for the purposes of eligibility were informal and ad hoc, but by the 1960s, sports governing bodies such as the IAAF and the IOC began system- atic mandatory testing of all women athletes based on rumors that some women “were more male than female,” resulting in “unfair competition for ‘real’ women.”14 There have never been analogous regulations for men.