Rule 15: National Federations Obligations
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Was Honoured to Be Invited by Oceania Athletics to Ho
Oceania Moves Towards One Athletics Family Oceania Masters Athletics (OMA) was honoured to be invited by Oceania Athletics to hold the OMA Council and AGM in conjunction with Oceania Athletics Association’s (OAA) biennial Congress held at the Gold Coast on 6-8 February 2015. This first joint meeting provided many of our Pacific Island member federations the opportunity to attend the OMA AGM and learn more about masters athletics in the Oceania region. Similarly it gave OMA Council members the opportunity to interact with delegates from the Oceania member federations (including Australia and New Zealand) as well as a range of athletic and pacific games dignitaries. These included the IAAF Vice President, Lord Sebastian Coe, the IAAF Secretary General, Essar Gabriel, and a number of IAAF Council and IAAF Committee members as well as the 2014 IAAF Female Athlete of the Year, Valerie Adams. It became apparent during the Congress that the Oceania region although representing less than 1% of the world’s population was highly regarded because of the strength of its regional development. This particular Congress had a greater degree of importance, because later this year there will be an election of a new IAAF President – both Sebastian Coe and Sergey Bubka are standing for the IAAF Presidency. The Oceania region is important in these upcoming elections because each IAAF member federation has one vote - thus tiny nations such as Nauru and Palau have the same vote as China or the USA. Report from OAA President Geoff Gardiner In typical Pacific Island style the Congress was opened by a moving sporting prayer by the Fiji delegate. -
UNHCR – Tegla Loroupe Peace Foundation Refugee Athletics Project
TEMPLATE FOR REPORTING ON RECENT INITIATIVES ON SPORT FOR DEVELOPMENT AND PEACE UNHCR – Tegla Loroupe Peace Foundation Refugee Athletics Project Provide a summary of the initiative, including a brief overview, proposed/actual outcomes and an assessment of any lessons learned and the way forward. Since 2015, UNHCR and the Tegla Loroupe Peace Foundation (TLPF) has collaborated to support talented refugee athletes in Kenya. The project seeks to tap into the energy, potential and talents of young refugees through positive sports-based engagement. It also aims to develop a quality, consistent and sustainable programme that would provide talented refugee athletes with an opportunity for maximal development of their skills in competitive sports, alongside continued academic education, aimed at personal growth and potential livelihoods, with eventual positive impact and motivation to the society at large. The project also aims to foster inclusive engagement and peaceful co-existence, as envisioned under the Global Compact on Refugees. In August 2016, 10 refugee athletes (five of them trained in Kenya under this project) competed in the Olympic Games for the first time in history. The refugee athletes were welcomed to the Olympic Games with the Olympic flag and anthem and competed as the Refugee Olympic Team. A second Refugee Olympic Team will be competing at the Olympic Games in Tokyo in 2020. It is envisaged that some athletes trained in the Kenya project will be selected as part of the Team. Please provide more details on the initiative below: -
Annual Report
2013-14 ANNUAL REPORT Contents President’s Report 2 Chief Executive Officer’s Report 6 Message from the Australian Sports Commission 8 High Performance 10 Competitions 14 Participation 16 Communications & Marketing 20 Board and Committees 22 Committees & Commissions 26 Summary of the Financial Report 30 Financial Report Directors’ Report 33 Auditors Independence Declaration 39 Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income 40 Statement of Financial Position 41 Statement of Changes in Equity 42 Statement of Cash Flows 43 Notes to the Financial Statements 44 Directors’ Declaration 57 Independent Auditor’s Report 58 Participation Figures 60 Athletics ACT 62 Athletics New South Wales 66 Athletics Northern Territory 70 Queensland Athletics 72 Athletics South Australia 74 Athletics Tasmania 76 Athletics Victoria 78 Athletics Western Australia 80 Vale 82 Australian Records 86 Life Members & Award Winners 88 Athletics Australia Board of Directors & Staff 96 Athletics Australia Annual Report 2013-14 1 President’s Report It is my pleasure to present the Annual Report for State and Territory Sport Institutes and Academies. Athletics Australia for the 2013/2014 financial The contribution of the Federal and State year. The Board of Athletics Australia appointed Governments to the establishment and running of me as President and Chairman in November Lakeside Stadium and Athletics House is gratefully 2013, succeeding Rob Fildes OAM who had acknowledged. served 8 distinguished years as President. Rob gave outstanding service to the sport of Athletics Australia continues to work closely with athletics and I congratulate him on his overall the Australian Sports Commission (ASC) who performance. It is certainly the case that athletics provides expert advice in relation to governance in Australia is in a much stronger position as a and leadership. -
Comités 2003-2007
LA IAAF COMITÉS 2003- 2007 COMITÉS 2003-2007 COMITÉ TECNICO Presidente Jorge SALCEDO (Portugal) Miembros Gabriel ABAD (España) Filbert BAYI (Tanzania) Julio Roberto GOMEZ (Colombia) Vivian GUNGARAM (Isla Mauricio) Al GUY (Irlanda) Klaus HARTZ (Alemania) David KATZ (Estados Unidos) David LITTLEWOOD (G. B. e I. del N.) Victor LOPEZ (Puerto Rico) Idalberto Jesus MOLINA HERNANDEZ (Cuba) Anna RICCARDI (Italia) Brian ROE (Australia) Chunde SHEN (China) Cecil SMITH (Canadá) P. SOLOMON (Malasia) Kari WAUHKONEN (Finlandia) Presidente Honorario Vitalicio Carl-Gustav Tollemar (Suecia) 50 COMITÉS 2003-2007 LA IAAF COMITÉ FEMENINO Presidente Ilse BECHTHOLD (Alemania) Miembros Yuko ARIMORI (Japón) Claire CHEHAB (Líbano) Maria Caridad COLON RUENES (Cuba) Pauline DAVIS-THOMPSON (Bahamas) Eleonor FROELICH (Chile) Dee JENSEN (Estados Unidos) Glynis NUNN-CEARNS (Australia) Giovanna ROUSSEAU (Seychelles) Maureen SWITZER (Canadá) Irena SZEWINSKA (Polonia) Gwenda Mary WARD (G. B. e I. del N.) COMITÉ DE MARCHA Presidente Maurizio DAMILANO (Italia) Miembros Khaled AMARA (Túnez) Robert BOWMAN (Estados Unidos) Don CHADDERTON (Nueva Zelanda) Sari ESSAYAH (Finlandia) Soliman Ahmed Aly HAGAR (Egipto) Viacheslav KRASNOV (Rusia) Peter MARLOW (G. B. e I. del N.) Fausto MENDOZA CAJAS (Ecuador) Gabriel ROLDAN OLVERA (México) Luis SALADIE (España) S. VEGIYATHUMAN (Malasia) Shande YANG (China) 51 LA IAAF COMITÉS 2003- 2007 COMITÉ DE CAMPO A TRAVÉS Y CARRERAS EN RUTA Presidente Otto KLAPPERT (Alemania) Miembros David BEDFORD (G. B. e I. deI N.) Carlos CARDOSO (Portugal) Hiroaki CHOSA (Japón) Ingrid KRISTIANSEN (Noruega) Luis Miguel LANDA (España) David OKEYO (Kenia) Marcos OVIEDO (Venezuela) Rabi RAJKARNIKAR (Nepal) Alan STEVENS (Nueva Zelanda) Mohammed Sulaiman TAIB (Qatar) Anne E. TIMMONS (Estados Unidos) Salih Munir YARAS (Turquía) COMITÉ DE VETERANOS Presidente Cesar MORENO BRAVO (México) Members Abderrahmane BELAID (Argelia) Jim BLAIR (Nueva Zelanda) Torsten CARLIUS (Suecia) Bridget CUSHEN (G. -
Athletics Australia Selection Policy World Athletics Relay Championships Silesia, Poland 1-2 May 2021
ATHLETICS AUSTRALIA SELECTION POLICY WORLD ATHLETICS RELAY CHAMPIONSHIPS SILESIA, POLAND 1-2 MAY 2021 Athletics Australia Selection Policy: World Athletics Relay Championships Contents 1. Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Team Selection Summary ............................................................................................................... 1 3. Selection Philosophy ....................................................................................................................... 2 4. Athlete Eligibility Criteria ................................................................................................................ 2 5. Selection Procedure ........................................................................................................................ 4 6. Further Obligations after Selection ................................................................................................. 7 7. Removal of Athletes ........................................................................................................................ 7 8. Replacement of Athletes................................................................................................................. 8 9. Selection Appeal Process ................................................................................................................ 8 10. Amendment to Policy................................................................................................................. -
Rule 15: National Federations Obligations
RULE 15: NATIONAL FEDERATIONS OBLIGATIONS LIST OF CATEGORISED NATIONAL MEMBER FEDERATIONS Category A – 7 Member Federations COUNTRY CODE MEMBER FEDERATION AREA ASSOC. Bahrain BRN Bahrain Athletics Association AAA Belarus BLR Belarus Athletic Federation EA Ethiopia ETH Ethiopian Athletic Federation CAA Kenya KEN Athletics Kenya CAA Morocco MAR Fédération Royale Marocaine d’Athlétisme CAA Nigeria NGR Athletic Federation of Nigeria CAA Ukraine UKR Ukrainian Athletic Federation EA 1st Floor, 6 Quai Antoine 1er, MC 98007 Monaco • T +33 1 85 64 22 50 Category B – 51 Member Federations COUNTRY CODE MEMBER FEDERATION AREA ASSOC. Algeria ALG Fédération Algérienne d'Athlétisme CAA Australia AUS Athletics Australia OAA Bahamas BAH Bahamas Association of Athletic Associations NACAC Belgium BEL Ligue Royale Belge d'Athlétisme EA Botswana BOT Botswana Athletics Association CAA Brazil BRA Confederação Brasileira de Atletismo CONSUDATLE Bulgaria BUL Bulgarian Athletic Federation EA Canada CAN Athletics Canada NACAC China CHN Chinese Athletic Association AAA Colombia COL Federacion Colombiana de Atletismo CONSUDATLE Cote d'Ivoire CIV Fédération Ivoirienne d'Athlétisme CAA Croatia CRO Croatian Athletics Federation EA Cuba CUB Federacion Cubana de Atletismo NACAC Czech Republic CZE Czech Athletic Federation EA Dominican Republic DOM Federacion Dominicana de Asociaciones de Atletismo NACAC Eritrea ERI Eritrean National Athletics Federation CAA Estonia EST Estonian Athletic Association EA Finland FIN Suomen Urheiluliitto RY EA France FRA Fédération Française -
Anglo-American Liberalism As a Dominant Factor in Nigerian Foreign Policy, 1960-1966
1x-.f 70-12,396 AKINYELE, Caleb Ibitayo, 1938- ANGLO-AMERICAN LIBERALISM AS A DOMINANT FACTOR IN NIGERIAN FOREIGN POLICY, 1960-1966. The American University, Ph.D., 1969 Political Science, international law and relations I University........ Microfilms, A XEROX Company, Ann.. Arbor, .. Michigan I] © Copyright by Caleb Ibitayo Akinyele ! 1970 ' ANGLO-AMERICAN LIBERALISM AS A DOMINANT FACTOR IN NIGERIAN FOREIGN POLICY, 1960-1966 by CALEB IBITAYO AKINYELE Submitted to the Faculty of the School of International Service of the American University in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Signatures of Committee Professor Whittle Johnson (Chairman). Professor Emmet V. Mittlebeeler Professor A Dean of the School of International Service AMERICAN UNIVERSITY Date... vDtJpooiuucxj X7U7 LIBRARY The American University Washington, D.C. NOV 51969 WASHINGTON. O. C Dedicated to my Parents Preface Great Britain started colonizing Nigeria at about the second half of the nineteenth century. From this time until October 1, I960, the date Nigeria became independent, the British introduced liberalism into the country as a political, economic and social philosophy. Although there exists a relatively large volume of (mostly scattered) literature on Nigerian foreign policy, the question of how the philosophy of liberalism, especially the Anglo-American style, has continued to influence Nigeria’s foreign (as well as domestic) policy even after independence, has not yet been investigated in an adequate chronological perspective. This largely factual, historical (and yet basically theoretical), study is meant to fill that gap. I hope the work will be found helpful particularly by students of Nigerian political affairs and in general by students of African studies. -
Track & Field Athletics Meeting
Track & Field Athletics Meeting See New Zealand’s best in action and breaking records!!! Saturday 20th January 2021 4:00 – 8:00pm Newtown Athletics Stadium, Wellington Entry Adults $10 Students $ 5 Prices Children (under 12) FREE Acesports and Athletics Wellington Track & Field present the 2021 TEAM LEDGER Harcourts Capital Classic Track & Field Meeting Mayor’s Welcome Kia ora competitors, supporters, and fans Welcome to the annual 17th Capital Classic Track and Field Meeting an event that has justly earnt its place in the annals of New Zealand sporting history. I want to acknowledge the commitment to your sporting discipline that will be so evident in this year’s competition. The challenge that you as individual athletes have faced to compete is inspiration to both fellow competitors and the wider community. The preparedness to pit yourself against each other and the elements is exciting and takes personal courage. In the words of the late and great Sir Peter Snell, “when it's pouring rain and you're bowling along through the wet, there's satisfaction in knowing you're out there and the others aren't.” Good luck everyone. Andy Foster Mayor of Wellington City Acesports and Athletics Wellington Track & Field present the 2021 TEAM LEDGER Harcourts Capital Classic Track & Field Meeting Welcome to Newtown Park on behalf of Athletics Wellington. This is the 17th edition of the Capital Classic and once again we are incredibly happy to hold such a prestigious event here in Wellington. We especially welcome all athletes and coaches who have travelled to Wellington this year and wish them all the best. -
Amending the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999
African Journal of Legal Studies 4 (2011) 123–148 brill.nl/ajls Amending the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 Nat Ofo* Senior Lecturer and Sub-Dean, College of Law, Igbinedion University Okada, Edo State, Nigeria Abstract The amendment of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 has not been free of contro- versies. The latest controversy dogging the amendment relates to whether or not it is necessary for the President to assent to the Bill of the National Assembly amending the Constitution, even after the amend- ment has been ratified by at least two-thirds of the Houses of Assembly of the States of the Federation. There are two schools of thought on this issue; each with sound arguments in support of their respective position. A dispassionate and realistic consideration of the issue has been undertaken in this article. The conclusion is reached that the provision of the constitution dealing with its amendment is not free from ambiguity. Its lack of clarity on its amendment procedure has made it obviously in dire need of amend- ment. Consequently, necessary suggestions on how to resolve the issues, including the amendment of the amendment-provision of the constitution have been proffered. Keywords constitutional law; constitutional amendment; 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria; assent of the President; interpretation of statutes; National Assembly; Senate; House of Representatives 1. Introduction Amending the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 19991 has ab ini- tio not been free from controversies. The latest controversy on the amendment of the 1999 Constitution relates to whether the assent of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is necessary before any purported amendment to the consti- tution can become effectual.2 As can be imagined, there are two views on the matter. -
Migrated Archives): Ceylon
Colonial administration records (migrated archives): Ceylon Following earlier settlements by the Dutch and Despatches and registers of despatches sent to, and received from, the Colonial Portuguese, the British colony of Ceylon was Secretary established in 1802 but it was not until the annexation of the Kingdom of Kandy in 1815 that FCO 141/2180-2186, 2192-2245, 2248-2249, 2260, 2264-2273: the entire island came under British control. In Open, confidential and secret despatches covering a variety of topics including the acts and ordinances, 1948, Ceylon became a self-governing state and a the economy, agriculture and produce, lands and buildings, imports and exports, civil aviation, railways, member of the British Commonwealth, and in 1972 banks and prisons. Despatches regarding civil servants include memorials, pensions, recruitment, dismissals it became the independent republic under the name and suggestions for New Year’s honours. 1872-1948, with gaps. The years 1897-1903 and 1906 have been of Sri Lanka. release in previous tranches. Below is a selection of files grouped according to Telegrams and registers of telegrams sent to and received from the Colonial Secretary theme to assist research. This list should be used in conjunction with the full catalogue list as not all are FCO 141/2187-2191, 2246-2247, 2250-2263, 2274-2275 : included here. The files cover the period between Open, confidential and secret telegrams on topics such as imports and exports, defence costs and 1872 and 1948 and include a substantial number of regulations, taxation and the economy, the armed forces, railways, prisons and civil servants 1899-1948. -
Doping Education Status in Kenya: Evaluation Of
DOPING EDUCATION STATUS IN KENYA: EVALUATION OF KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES AND PRACTICE OF DOPING AMONG ELITE KENYAN ATHLETES REPORT COMPILED FOR THE WORLD ANTI-DOPING AGENCY (WADA) Michael Boit1, Paul Dimeo2, Vincent Onywera 1, Gitahi Theuri 1, Festus Kiplamai 1, Selina Sigei1, Danielle Stewart 2, Lorcan Cronin 2 1Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya 2University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................................... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 3 LITERATURE REVIEW .............................................................................................................................. 3 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Diet and lifestyle factors............................................................................................................................ 4 Historical and physiological explanations ................................................................................................. 4 Environmental influences.......................................................................................................................... 4 Athlete motivation ................................................................................................................................... -
World Athletics V Mercy Jerotich Kibarus
SR/069/2020 IN THE MATTER OF PROCEEDINGS BROUGHT UNDER THE ANTI-DOPING RULES OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ATHLETICS FEDERATIONS Before: Mr Dennis Koolaard (Sole Arbitrator) BETWEEN: WORLD ATHLETICS Anti-Doping Organisation and Ms MERCY JEROTICH KIBARUS Respondent DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL I. INTRODUCTION 1. The Claimant, World Athletics (“WA”) (formerly International Association of Athletics Federations (“IAAF”)), is the international federation governing the sport of athletics worldwide. It has its registered seat in Monaco. World Athletics is represented in these proceedings by the Athletics Integrity Unit (“AIU”) which has delegated authority for results management and hearings, amongst other functions relating to the implementation of the 2019 IAAF Anti-Doping Rules (“ADR”), on behalf of WA pursuant to Article 1.2 of the ADR. 2. The Respondent, Ms Mercy Jerotich Kibarus (the “Athlete”), is a 36-year-old female long-distance runner from Kenya. 3. These proceedings concern the presence of 19-Norandrosterone (“19-NA”), a metabolite of Nandrolone, which is a substance listed in category S1.1B Endogenous Anabolic Androgenic Steroids and their Metabolites and isomers, when administered exogenously of the WADA 2019 Prohibited List as a non-specified substance that is prohibited at all times, in two urine samples collected from the Athlete on 13 (“Sample 1”) and 15 September 2019 (“Sample 2” – and jointly referred to as the “Samples”) in the lead up to and then during the ‘Sanlam Cape Town Marathon’ held in Cape Town, South Africa.1 4. The AIU charges the Athlete with a violation of Article 2.1 (“Presence”) and 2.2 (“Use”) ADR.