What Makes up the Coach-Athlete Relationship?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

What Makes up the Coach-Athlete Relationship? UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES School of Education What makes up the Coach-Athlete Relationship? by Sara Almeida Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2018 Table of contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 9 Academic Thesis: Declaration Of Authorship .................................................................... 11 Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................. 13 Personal Statement ........................................................................................................... 15 Chapter One ...................................................................................................................... 17 Sport .............................................................................................................................. 17 Research Problem ......................................................................................................... 18 Olympic Games .......................................................................................................... 19 Olympic Games Rio 2016 ........................................................................................... 20 History of Athletics: How everything began .................................................................... 21 Current structure and organisations of Athletics in Portugal ....................................... 23 Current structure and organisations of Athletics in England ....................................... 23 Being a coach in Portugal and England ...................................................................... 24 Chapter Summary .......................................................................................................... 29 Chapter Two ...................................................................................................................... 31 Literature Review ........................................................................................................... 31 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 31 The coach ................................................................................................................... 32 The athlete .................................................................................................................. 39 Coach-Athlete Relationship ........................................................................................ 42 Chapter Summary .......................................................................................................... 51 Chapter Three ................................................................................................................... 53 Conceptual framework and Model Development ........................................................... 53 Identity of the Participants .......................................................................................... 54 Relationship variables ................................................................................................. 55 Outcomes....................................................................................................................... 72 2 Chapter Summary .......................................................................................................... 72 Chapter Four ..................................................................................................................... 75 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 75 Research Design and Philosophy .................................................................................. 75 Methods ......................................................................................................................... 80 Stage 1 ....................................................................................................................... 80 Stage 2 ....................................................................................................................... 80 Stage 3 ....................................................................................................................... 86 Stage 4 ....................................................................................................................... 95 Chapter Summary .......................................................................................................... 97 Chapter Five ...................................................................................................................... 99 Interviews' Analysis ........................................................................................................ 99 Study Participants ....................................................................................................... 99 Interview Findings and Discussion ............................................................................ 101 Chapter Six ..................................................................................................................... 125 Description of the Respondents ................................................................................... 125 Research Objective 1: Psychometric analysis of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Inventory (CARI) .......................................................................................................... 126 Steps involved to examine the factors ...................................................................... 126 Research Objective 2: Cross Cultural Comparison of the Survey Data ....................... 132 Questions ................................................................................................................. 132 Chapter Summary ........................................................................................................ 136 Chapter Seven ................................................................................................................ 139 Discussion.................................................................................................................... 139 Exploring coaches and athletes’ perceptions of their relationship ............................ 139 The Coach-Athlete Relationship model (CAR) ......................................................... 141 Inventory Development and application .................................................................... 145 3 Research Methods limitations ................................................................................... 146 Contribution to research ........................................................................................... 146 Contribution to policy makers ................................................................................... 149 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 150 Bibliography .................................................................................................................... 153 Appendix A – Participant Information Sheet .................................................................... 169 Appendix B – Consent Form ........................................................................................... 171 Appendix C – Interview Schedule ................................................................................... 173 Appendix D – Interview Transcripts ................................................................................. 177 Appendix E – Ethics Clearence ....................................................................................... 202 Appendix F – Questionnaire ............................................................................................ 203 Appendix G – Reliability of the 8 Scales .......................................................................... 207 Appendix H – Descriptive Statistics ................................................................................. 209 Appendix I – Strenght of the Relationship among the 57 items ....................................... 215 Appendix J – KMO and Bartlett’s test .............................................................................. 217 Appendix K – Normality of the 8 Scales .......................................................................... 219 Appendix L – MANOVA between the 8 Scales and Gender ............................................ 227 Appendix M – MANOVA between the 8 Scales and Age Group ..................................... 231 Appendix N – MANOVA between the 8 Scales and Country ........................................... 235 4 Table of Figures Figure 1 England coach education pathway (Athletics 2018) ............................................ 28 Figure 2 The coach-athlete relationship model (Jowett and Meek 2000 ) ......................... 47 Figure 3 New conceptual model of the coach-athlete relationship (CAR) ......................... 54 Figure 4 Carron’s conceptual system for cohesiveness in sports teams 1982 .................. 58 Figure 5 Research Process Source: Inspired by Saunders et al. (2009) ........................... 78 Figure 6 England and PT coaches’ years of Athletics experience ................................... 100 Figure 7 England
Recommended publications
  • Athletics Inclusive April - June 2021
    ATHLETICS INCLUSIVE APRIL - JUNE 2021 Welcome to the second edition of the quarterly equality, diversity and inclusion news from UK Athletics, Athletics Northern Ireland, England Athletics, Scottish Athletics and Welsh Athletics. PARA INCLUSION Welsh Athletics As part of our ongoing commitment to closer working with Disability Sport Wales [DSW], Welsh Athletics is in the process of recruiting a jointly funded Para Athletics Pathway Coordinator. We have seen great recent success at the European Para-athletics Championships with a total of 7 medals from Welsh Athletes and we hope this joint working will continue and build on this success as the organisation become more closely integrated. The role will support the development and progression of Para Athletes within the Athletics Pathway (from community through to performance) as identified by Disability Sport Wales and Welsh Athletics. It will aim to ensure that all Para Athletes within the pathway have access to appropriate and meaningful community opportunities to support individual needs. There will also be mentoring and upskilling outreach support for athletes, coaches, clubs and key contacts in collaboration with the DSW Performance Pathway Team and WA. This is an exciting opportunity in a role which will be fully integrated into the Welsh Athletics Performance team at the start of preparations for the Birmingham 2022 Games. Scottish Athletics With athletics training returning across the country, a Safe Return to Training guide has been produced for wheelchair and frame running to remind athletes, coaches and clubs of the extra safety considerations. The guidance highlights equipment checks, how to minimise risks, training safely on the track and training safely on the road.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Review of the Evidence Base for Developing a Physical
    A Systematic Review of the Evidence Base for Developing a Physical Activity and Health Legacy from the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE BASE FOR DEVELOPING A PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND HEALTH LEGACY FROM THE LONDON 2012 OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC GAMES by the CENTRE FOR SPORT, PHYSICAL EDUCATION & ACTIVITY RESEARCH (SPEAR) Canterbury Christ Church University Report Authors: Mike Weed Esther Coren Jo Fiore With Louise Mansfield Ian Wellard Dikaia Chatziefstathiou Suzanne Dowse Commissioned by Physical Activity Network West Midlands on behalf of Regional Physical Activity Teams in the West Midlands, the East Midlands, the East of England, London and the South East. February 2009 1 Foreword Planning our Route to a 2012 Health & Physical Activity Legacy The 2012 Games will aim to set a new standard for the Olympic and Paralympic movement in staging a ‘once in a lifetime’ event that delivers genuine nationwide legacies in the form of economic, social, health and environmental benefits for the United Kingdom. In order to achieve a tangible and lasting legacy for the country, we need to start to prepare now. We need to be planning, creating policy and building capacity to encourage and allow more people to get more active. We have a rare opportunity to radically change the sedentary culture in the United Kingdom. Regional physical activity teams in London, West Midlands, East Midlands, the East and the South East are already collaborating to drive this work forward. This systematic review sets out the lessons learned from the best available international evidence. It will enable us to work with greater confidence towards securing a true and lasting health and physical activity legacy from the 2012 Games.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Forecasting the Olympic Medal Distribution During a Pandemic
    Forecasting the Olympic medal distribution during a pandemic: A socio-economic machine learning model ∗ Christoph Schlembach, Sascha L. Schmidt, Dominik Schreyer, and Linus Wunderlich First Version: December 09, 2020 This Version: June 21, 2021 Abstract Forecasting the number of Olympic medals for each nation is highly relevant for different stakeholders: Ex ante, sports betting companies can determine the odds while sponsors and media companies can allocate their resources to promising teams. Ex post, sports politicians and managers can benchmark the performance of their teams and evaluate the drivers of success. To significantly increase the Olympic medal forecasting accuracy, we apply machine learning, more specifically a two-staged Random Forest, thus outperforming more traditional naïve forecast for three previous Olympics held between 2008 and 2016 for the first time. Regarding the Tokyo 2020 Games in 2021, our model suggests that the United States will lead the Olympic medal table, winning 120 medals, followed by China (87) and Great Britain (74). Keywords: Olympic Games, medals, sports, forecasting, machine learning, random forest JEL: C53; Z20 Running head: Forecasting the Olympic medal distribution ∗ Schlembach: WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management, Erkrather Str. 224a, 40233, Düsseldorf, Germany (e-mail: [email protected]); Schmidt: WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management, Erkrather Str. 224a, 40233, Düsseldorf, Germany, and CREMA – Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts, Switzerland, and LISH – Lab of Innovation Science at Harvard, 175 N. Harvard Street Suite 1350, Boston, MA 02134, USA (e-mail: [email protected]); Schreyer: WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management, Erkrather Str. 224a, 40233, Düsseldorf, Germany (e-mail: [email protected]); Wunderlich: School of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary University London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS (e-mail: [email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Sport Mega-Events and a Legacy of Increased
    SPORT MEGA-EVENTS AND A LEGACY OF INCREASED SPORT PARTICIPATION: AN OLYMPIC PROMISE OR AN OLYMPIC DREAM? KATHARINE HELEN HUGHES A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Leeds Metropolitan University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. JANUARY 2013 1 Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ 7 Abstract ............................................................................................................................. 8 Student’s declaration ....................................................................................................... 10 List of Tables and Figures ................................................................................................ 11 List of Acronyms .............................................................................................................. 12 Preface ............................................................................................................................ 14 Chapter 1: Context of the study ....................................................................................... 17 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 17 1.2 Structure of the thesis ......................................................................................................... 19 1.3 Research aims and questions ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nadim NASSIF ANALYSE DE LA POLITIQUE DU SPORT AU LIBAN
    16th Annual International Conference on Sports: Economic, Management, Marketing & Social Aspects, 9-12 May 2016, Athens, Greece Elite Sport Ranking of the “International Society of Sports Sciences in the Arab World:” An Accurate Evaluation of Nations Performances in International Sports Competitions Nadim Nassif, PhD, Academic Advisor of the Physical Education and Sports Major Manager of the FIFA/CIES Sport Management Program Notre-Dame University. Results and rankings are a predominant and unavoidable measurement of the performance of athletes, clubs and national teams Countries rankings are therefore very appropriate tools in determining which national sport movements are the most efficient in the establishment of policies leading to international success The most known ranking worldwide is the medal table proposed by the International Olympic Committee at the end of each edition of the Winter and Summer Olympics Although according to the Olympic Charter, the Olympic medal table is just informative and the IOC shall not draw up any global ranking per country, scholars, media and national sport leaders mainly refer to it when they want to measure the performance of a country in international competitions "I believe each country will highlight what suits it best. One country will say, 'Gold medals.' The other country will say, 'The total tally counts.' We take no position on that.” IOC President Jacques Rogge (Washington Post, 2008) The global acknowledgement of the Olympic Medal Table arises from the fact that the Olympic Games are the
    [Show full text]
  • Stakeholder Consultation
    Final Report Stakeholder consultation January 2015 CONTENTS Contents ..................................................................................................................... 2 About UK Sport ............................................................................................................ 9 Core responsibilities ................................................................................................ 9 Overview ................................................................................................................... 11 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 11 The purpose of consultation ................................................................................... 11 This report ............................................................................................................. 11 Methodology .......................................................................................................... 12 Defining the stakeholder universe .......................................................................... 13 Executive summary .................................................................................................... 14 Participant profile ...................................................................................................... 17 Stakeholder workshops .......................................................................................... 17 Written submissions ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Competitive School Sport Summary Report
    National Governing Bodies of Sport Survey Competitive School Sport Summary Report June 2014 Prepared by the TOP Foundation for Ofsted SportPark, Loughborough University, 3 Oakwood Drive, Loughborough, LE11 3QF NGB Competitive School Sport Investigation Summary Report Executive Summary In the spring of 2014 an investigation commissioned by Ofsted explored the school backgrounds, ethnicity and socioeconomic status of some of our best adult and age group international sport teams. The same investigation asked 29 National Governing Bodies of sport (NGBs) to report on their competitive school sport provision in 39 different sports; 26 (90%) NGBs agreed to take part and they reported on 35 sports. This NGBs report is part of a wider investigation being undertaken by Ofsted into competitive school sport for Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills (HMCI), Sir Michael Wilshaw, which includes a supporting report with input from headteachers. This investigation collated 6 different sets of data on the known school backgrounds of: i. Current international representatives from 14 sports (n=224) ii. London 2012 Olympic Team (n=279) iii. London 2012 Paralympic Team (n=106) iv. Players competing in national leagues in 5 sports (n=543) v. UK Sport’s Athlete Insights Survey: Olympic sports (n=606) vi. UK Sport’s Athlete Insights Survey: Paralympic sports (n=247). Analysis showed similar trends across the different data sets. The 2 Paralympic data sets provided a mean of 81% for athletes attending state schools only, 13% for independent schools only and 3% for both types of school. The 2 Olympic data sets provided a mean of 66% for athletes attending state schools only, 22% for independent schools only and 6% for both types of school.
    [Show full text]
  • Couch 2 5K Leader Requirements As a Result of the Increase in Recreational Running As Well As Participation Running Initiatives
    Couch 2 5K Leader Requirements As a result of the increase in recreational running as well as participation running initiatives such as ‘Couch 2 5K’ programmes being delivered by clubs, community groups and external agencies across the UK there is a need for a clear set of guidelines regarding coach/leader requirements to deliver such programmes. To become a participation running group leader, you need to have completed one of following UK Athletics courses/qualifications delivered by Athletics NI or an alternative Home Country Governing body (England Athletics, Welsh Athletics, Scottish Athletics): ● Leadership in Running Fitness (LiRF-available in all home countries) ● Jog Scotland - ‘Jog leader’ (available only in Scotland) ● Coach in Running Fitness (CiRF-available in all home countries) ● Athletics Coach (or legacy UKA Level 2 and above) **Equivalent IAAF qualifications are also recognised. Athletics NI offer a range of coaching qualifications accredited by British Athletics that provide leaders, assistants and coaches with insurance cover in the case of an accident. (http://www.britishathletics.org.uk/governance/insurance/) Individuals who successfully complete these awards and return a clear Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) check (known as AccessNI in Northern Ireland) are issued with a British Athletics leadership/coaching license. This insures them to operate within the limitations of this license, which varies depending on the award undertaken. If you're just starting out as a run leader in Northern Ireland, the Leadership in Running Fitness qualification is the course for you. You will learn essential health and safety for leading a group run, how to structure running sessions appropriate to the level of your runners (including warm-ups, cool-downs and stretches), and how to plan suitable routes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rio Review the Official Report Into Ireland's Campaign for the Rio 2016 Olympic and Paralympic Games
    SPÓRT ÉIREANN SPORT IRELAND The Rio Review The official report into Ireland's campaign for the Rio 2016 Olympic and Paralympic Games RIO 2016 REVIEW Foreword The Olympic and Paralympic review process is an essential component of the Irish high performance system. The implementation of the recommendations of the quadrennial reviews has been a driver of Irish high performance programmes for individual sports and the system as a whole. The Rio Review process has been comprehensive and robust. The critical feature of this Review is that the National Governing Bodies (NGBs) took a greater level of control in debriefing their own experiences. This Review reflects the views of all the key players within the high performance system. Endorsed by Sport Ireland, it is a mandate for the NGBs to fully implement the recommendations that will improve the high performance system in Ireland. There were outstanding performances in Rio at both the Olympic and Paralympic Games. The Olympic roll of honour received a new addition in Rowing, with Sailing repeating its podium success achieved in Moscow 1980, demonstrating Ireland's ability to be competitive in multiple disciplines. Team Ireland has built on the success of Beijing and London, and notwithstanding problems that arose, Rio was a clear demonstration that Ireland can compete at the very highest levels of international sport. Sport Ireland is committed to the ongoing development of the Sport Ireland Institute and adding to the extensive facilities on the Sport Ireland National Sports Campus. These are real commitments to high performance sport in Ireland that will make a significant difference to Irish athletes who aspire to compete at the top level.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paradox of Measuring Success of Nations in Elite Sport
    The paradox of measuring success of nations in elite sport Veerle De Bosscher, Bruno Heyndels, Paul De Knop Vrije Universiteit Brussel Maarten van Bottenburg Utrecht University Simon Shibli Sheffield Hallam University ABSTRACT The achievement of international and especially Olympic sporting success is increas- ingly important to a growing number of countries. It is however not clear how success is defined and can be measured. The number of medals won in Olympics Games and other international sport competitions offers the most self-evident and transparent mea- sure of success in high performance sport. In this article different methods to measure success of nations are compared. Market share was identified as the best measure of absolute success which enables meaningful time series analysis to be conducted. A Linear regression analysis is used to introduce relative success as a measurement of success when controlling for macro determinants such as population and wealth. This method allows comparing nations on more equal grounds, which is necessary if one wants to measure effectiveness of elite sport policies. Similar analysis is done for Olympic Summer and Winter Sports. It is concluded that conflicting results can be given on nations' success. Defining success therefore depends on the purpose wherefore it is used and on the priorities of individual nations. KEY WORDS: elite sport, international success, measuring success, Olympic success RÉSUMÉ MESURER LES PERFORMANCES DES NATIONS EN SPORT DE HAUT NIVEAU: UN PROBLÈME PARADOXAL Les performances sportives au niveau international, et particulièrement au niveau olym- pique, prennent de plus en plus d’importance pour un nombre croissant de nations.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Sport Media Guide Contents Introduction
    UK Sport Media Guide Contents Introduction Introduction 3 Rod Carr, Chair, UK Sport UK Sport History 5 London 2012 was without doubt one of the greatest British sporting triumphs in history. Our athletes achieved Facts and Figures 15 unprecedented medal success across a wide range of sports, some for the first time, and made the nation Sport-by-Sport 19 immensely proud. Finishing third in the medal table at both the Olympic and Paralympic Games was a remarkable A Winning Formula 23 achievement, and one that came about following the hard Spokespeople and Areas of Expertise 27 work and dedication of our sports and athletes, coupled with sustained and substantial investment from the British • Rod Carr (Chair) 28 Government and The National Lottery. • Liz Nicholl (Chief Executive Officer) 28 This investment has allowed us to develop a high performance system that is the envy of the world. The single British Olympic gold medal at Atlanta 1996 might seem like • David Cole (Chief Operating Officer) 29 a distant memory, but it is one we should not forget; our nation has been on quite a journey over the past 17 years and London was far from the finish line. • Simon Timson (Director of Performance) 31 The Government’s commitment in 2012 to continue funding for elite sport through the • Chelsea Warr (Deputy Director of Performance) 31 Rio cycle has allowed us to set the ambitious goal of becoming the first nation in recent • Natalie Dunman (Head of Performance Pathways) 33 history to win more medals at the Olympic and Paralympic Games post-hosting.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Athletics and the Home Country Governing Bodies
    UK Athletics and the Home Country Governing Bodies Child Safeguarding Policy Policy Owner: UKA Lead Safeguarding Officer Policy approved by: The Boards of UKA and the Home Country Affiliated Federations Date Policy approved: 31/01/2021 Next review Date: 01/02/2021 Version: WASG03.0 Child Safeguarding Policy Last reviewed: November 2020 Policy owner: James Williams, CEO Approved by: Board Audience: All 1 Contents: Section 1. Child Safeguarding Policy. ...................................................................................................... 3 Policy Objectives: ................................................................................................................................ 3 Policy Statement: ................................................................................................................................ 4 Application: ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Definition of a child: ............................................................................................................................ 5 Key Principles: ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Implementation: ................................................................................................................................. 6 Equality: .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]