Appendix: Sympathomimetic Pressors

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix: Sympathomimetic Pressors Appendix: Sympathomimetic Pressors Jeffrey Brent Contents Dopamine Dopamine .......................................... 3009 Action and Structure ................................ 3009 Action and Structure Dosage and Administration . ....................... 3010 Precautions and Contraindications ................. 3010 Dopamine (Fig. 1) exerts its action predominantly Epinephrine ........................................ 3011 through the following three mechanisms: Action and Structure ................................ 3011 Dosage and Administration . ....................... 3011 Precautions and Contraindications ................. 3012 1. Dopamine receptor agonism: Dopamine is an agonist for the dopamine receptor. Dopamine Norepinephrine .................................... 3013 administration causes dopamine1 (D1) Action and Structure ................................ 3013 – Dosage and Administration . ....................... 3013 receptor mediated vasodilation. Precautions and Contraindications ................. 3013 2. β1-receptor agonism: At doses higher than Phenylephrine ..................................... 3014 those required for D1 receptor agonism (see Action ............................................... 3014 subsequently), dopamine may cause stimula- Dosage and Administration . ....................... 3014 tion of β1-receptors. Precautions and Contraindications ................. 3015 3. Generation of norepinephrine: As shown in Fig. 2, dopamine is a precursor in the biosyn- thetic pathway of epinephrine and norepineph- rine. Approximately 75% of an administered dose of dopamine is inactivated by either monoamine oxidase (MAO) or catechol O-methyl transferase (COMT), and only about 25% is stoichiometrically converted to norepinephrine. Because of this, norepinephrine-mediated α-receptor agonism is seen only when high doses (see subse- quently) of dopamine are administered. Based on animal data, it seems that dopamine J. Brent does not cross the placenta, and it does not cross Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical – Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Colorado, the blood brain barrier except in preterm infants. School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA Its volume of distribution has been reported to # Springer International Publishing AG 2017 3009 J. Brent et al. (eds.), Critical Care Toxicology, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-17900-1 3010 J. Brent Fig. 1 Chemical structures of dopamine, norepinephrine, epinephrine, and phenylephrine. Where indicated, the (R)-isomer, which possesses the most adrenergic activity, is shown range from 1.81 to 2.45 L/kg, and dopamine’s 2. Intermediate dose: At doses ranging from 3 to primary metabolite by MAO and COMT is homo- 10 μg/kg/min, predominantly β1-receptor vanillic acid. Its half-life is approximately 2 min effects are seen. There is still an increase in in adults, although it can be significantly longer in D1-mediated blood flow in the above- small children. Plasma dopamine concentrations described vascular territories and in the are normally less than 100 pg/mL. β1-receptor effects on the heart, resulting in an increase in heart rate, cardiac contractility, cardiac index, and conduction. At these doses, Dosage and Administration there may be modest increases in blood pres- sure but generally few effects on systemic vas- Dopamine should be administered intravenously. cular resistance (SVR), although small Solutions may be prepared by mixing decreases in SVR, may be seen. 200–800 mg of dopamine in 250–1000 mL of 3. High dose: At doses greater than 10 μg/kg/min, any standard intravenous solution. the α-adrenergic effects from norepinephrine Because of the various mechanisms by which synthesis tend to predominate and may over- dopamine acts, its effects depend on the dose whelm the D1 receptor–mediated vasodilation administered. There are several possible ranges of the above-described vascular beds. Doses of doses, as follows: greater than 50 μg/kg/min predictably cause severe vasoconstriction and generally should 1. Low dose: Doses ranging from 1 to 3 μg/kg/ not be used. min act primarily to dilate renal, intracerebral, mesenteric, and coronary vascular beds through activation of the D1 receptor. At these Precautions and Contraindications doses, there tends to be little observed effect on most monitored hemodynamic parameters, Because MAO is a major enzyme in the catabo- although in some cases the vasodilation of lism of dopamine, patients taking an inhibitor of these beds may cause a decrease in mean and this enzyme (see ▶ Chap. 50, “Monoamine Oxi- diastolic blood pressure. dase Inhibitors”) are expected to have a Appendix: Sympathomimetic Pressors 3011 Epinephrine Action and Structure Epinephrine (see Fig. 1), a term applicable only to the L-isomer of 1-(3,4-dihydroxy phenyl)-2- methylamino ethanol, exerts its action predomi- nantly through the following two mechanisms: 1. β-Receptor agonism: Epinephrine is an agonist at β-receptors causing an increase in cardiac index, contractility, conduction, and heart rate. At low doses (see subsequently), the vasodilating effects of β-receptor agonism pre- dominate, resulting in a decrease in SVR and widening of the pulse pressure. Epinephrine is not an ideal first-line vasopressor except in cases of anaphylactic shock. 2. α-Receptor agonism: At higher doses (see subsequently), epinephrine has significant α-receptor agonism resulting in an increase in SVR and mean arterial blood pressure. These effects may result in a reflex decrease in heart rate. Plasma epinephrine concentrations normally are 15–55 pg/mL. It is metabolized by MAO and COMT (Fig. 3). Its half-life is 2–3 min. Dosage and Administration Epinephrine is compatible with most standard intravenous fluid solutions. Autooxidation may Fig. 2 Biosynthesis of catecholamines occur in bicarbonate-containing solutions, how- ever. It is generally constituted as a 1:1000 (1 mg/mL) or 1:10,000 (100 μg/mL) solution; 10 mL of 1:100,000 is equivalent to 1 mg. When substantially exaggerated effect. It is generally given as a constant infusion, typically 1–2mgis recommended that doses of dopamine approxi- diluted into 250 mL (i.e., 4–8 μg/mL) of 5% mating one tenth of standard doses be adminis- dextrose in water or normal saline. tered in patients taking these agents. If these doses Epinephrine is best administered intrave- are ineffective, the dose can be titrated to the nously. If access is not immediately available, desired clinical effect. Because many dopamine other routes are possible. It can be given subcuta- preparations contain sodium metabisulfite, neously, typically as a 1:1000 solution, but the patients with sulfite allergies may develop allergic effects are delayed and variable, particularly reactions to dopamine administration. because of the local vasoconstriction it causes. 3012 J. Brent Fig. 3 Metabolism of norepinephrine and epinephrine by glycol, DHMA 3,4-dihydroxymandelic acid, MHPG monoamine oxidase (MAO) and catechol O-methyl- 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylethylene glycol, VMA transferase (COMT). DHPGAL 3,4-dihydroxyphenyl- 3-methoxy-4-hydroxymandelic acid, MHPGAL 3-methoxy- glycolaldehyde, DHPEG 3,4-dihydro-xyphenyl ethylene 4-hydroxyphenylglycol aldehyde Epinephrine also can be administered via an endo- α-adrenergic effects become evident and eventu- tracheal tube in an emergent situation, whereby its ally predominate. The exact doses at which these pharmacologic effect is approximately half of that effects occur in the individual patient are variable which would be achieved by intravenous and should be determined based on the assess- administration. ment of the clinical response. In almost all circumstances in a critically ill patient, epinephrine should be infused intrave- nously, typically at doses ranging from 1 to Precautions and Contraindications 10 μg/min (0.02–0.2 μg/kg/min) and subse- quently titrated to the desired effect. At the lower Patients on β-receptor antagonist therapy may end of this dose spectrum, β-adrenergic effects have an exaggerated hypertensive effect after the predominate. As the dose is increased, administration of epinephrine due to unopposed Appendix: Sympathomimetic Pressors 3013 α-receptor agonism. In patients taking these Norepinephrine generally is used primarily for agents, epinephrine should be used at the lowest its α-receptor–mediated vasoconstrictive proper- possible doses, which can be titrated as necessary. ties. As described earlier, it is preferable to epi- This effect potentially is seen even with patients nephrine in this regard despite norepinephrine’s using β-receptor antagonist eye drops. Because lower potency at the α-receptor because of epi- patients taking tricyclic antidepressants or nephrine’s vasodilating effect secondary to its venlafaxine have reduced reuptake of sympatho- agonist properties at the β2-receptor. The net result mimetic amines, their response to epinephrine of the administration of norepinephrine is an may be exaggerated. Here too doses should start increase in SVR and mean arterial blood pressure. low and be titrated gradually to the desired clinical Norepinephrine is metabolized by COMT and effect. MAO. The product of COMT metabolism is Because of a possible “catecholamine-sensitiz- normetanephrine, which is inactive. MAO action ing” effect of halogenated hydrocarbons on the forms norepinephrine aldehyde, which is subse- heart, epinephrine and other β-receptor agonists quently methylated by COMT to the inactive should be used cautiously in patients poisoned by vanillylmandelic acid. these agents. If it is necessary
Recommended publications
  • Index Vol. 12-15
    353 INDEX VOL. 12-15 Die Stichworte des Sachregisters sind in der jeweiligen Sprache der einzelnen Beitrage aufgefiihrt. Les termes repris dans la Table des matieres sont donnes selon la langue dans laquelle l'ouvrage est ecrit. The references of the Subject Index are given in the language of the respective contribution. 14 AAG (Alpha-acid glycoprotein) 120 14 Adenosine 108 12 Abortion 151 12 Adenosine-phosphate 311 13 Abscisin 12, 46, 66 13 Adenosine-5'-phosphosulfate 148 14 Absorbierbarkeit 317 13 Adenosine triphosphate 358 14 Absorption 309, 350 15 S-Adenosylmethionine 261 13 Absorption of drugs 139 13 Adipaenin (Spasmolytin) 318 14 - 15 12 Adrenal atrophy 96 14 Absorptionsgeschwindigkeit 300, 306 14 - 163, 164 14 Absorptionsquote 324 13 Adrenal gland 362 14 ACAI (Anticorticocatabolic activity in­ 12 Adrenalin(e) 319 dex) 145 14 - 209, 210 12 Acalo 197 15 - 161 13 Aceclidine (3-Acetoxyquinuclidine) 307, 13 {i-Adrenergic blockers 119 308, 310, 311, 330, 332 13 Adrenergic-blocking activity 56 13 Acedapsone 193,195,197 14 O(-Adrenergic blocking drugs 36, 37, 43 13 Aceperone (Acetabutone) 121 14 {i-Adrenergic blocking drugs 38 12 Acepromazin (Plegizil) 200 14 Adrenergic drugs 90 15 Acetanilid 156 12 Adrenocorticosteroids 14, 30 15 Acetazolamide 219 12 Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) 13 Acetoacetyl-coenzyme A 258 16,30,155 12 Acetohexamide 16 14 - 149,153,163,165,167,171 15 1-Acetoxy-8-aminooctahydroindolizin 15 Adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) 216 (Slaframin) 168 14 Adrenosterone 153 13 4-Acetoxy-1-azabicyclo(3, 2, 2)-nonane 12 Adreson 252
    [Show full text]
  • Toluene Poisoning (Accidental Ingestion of Evostik) Summary
    Toluene Poisoning (Accidental Ingestion of Evostik) *Solarin A.U1, Aremu E.O1, Gbelee O.H1, Animasahun A.B1, Akinola A.O1, Ogunlana A.T1, Nwakpele O.T1, Olugbade O1 1. Department of Paediatrics, Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Ikeja Lagos. Corresponding Author: Solarin A.U. Email address: [email protected] Summary INTRODUCTION Childhood poisoning is one of the causes of high morbidity and mortality especially among under-five children in low income countries. The home and its surroundings may harbour poisonous substances which might be ingested by adventurous children. Evo-stik glue is a modified silane (MS) polymer based high performance adhesive. It contains toluene, a colourless, sweet-smelling liquid with detrimental effects on virtually every organ in the body especially brain and kidneys. Toluene is a component of household items such as gasoline, shoe and nail polish. AIM / OBJECTIVES From a few reported cases of toluene poisoning worldwide there was need to create awareness on the possibility of toluene poisoning as well as its deleterious effects. This is a case report on exposure to the effects of toluene by accidental ingestion that set the platform to emphasize the importance of prompt and appropriate management of toluene poisoning. METHODOLOGY This case report is about a 2year old girl who accidentally ingested 15-20ml evostik glue stored in an attractive container in the home. QH was presented at the Lagos State University Teaching Hospital Paediatric Emergency Unit with a one day history of persistent spontaneous, non-projectile and non-bilous vomiting. On admission, she was conscious, moderately dehydrated with dry buccal mucosa.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Quantitative PCR Assay for the Detection And
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/544247; this version posted February 8, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Development of a quantitative PCR assay for the detection and enumeration of a potentially ciguatoxin-producing dinoflagellate, Gambierdiscus lapillus (Gonyaulacales, Dinophyceae). Key words:Ciguatera fish poisoning, Gambierdiscus lapillus, Quantitative PCR assay, Great Barrier Reef Kretzschmar, A.L.1,2, Verma, A.1, Kohli, G.S.1,3, Murray, S.A.1 1Climate Change Cluster (C3), University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, 2007 NSW, Australia 2ithree institute (i3), University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, 2007 NSW, Australia, [email protected] 3Alfred Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum fr Polar- und Meeresforschung, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570, Bremerhaven, Germany Abstract Ciguatera fish poisoning is an illness contracted through the ingestion of seafood containing ciguatoxins. It is prevalent in tropical regions worldwide, including in Australia. Ciguatoxins are produced by some species of Gambierdiscus. Therefore, screening of Gambierdiscus species identification through quantitative PCR (qPCR), along with the determination of species toxicity, can be useful in monitoring potential ciguatera risk in these regions. In Australia, the identity, distribution and abundance of ciguatoxin producing Gambierdiscus spp. is largely unknown. In this study we developed a rapid qPCR assay to quantify the presence and abundance of Gambierdiscus lapillus, a likely ciguatoxic species. We assessed the specificity and efficiency of the qPCR assay. The assay was tested on 25 environmental samples from the Heron Island reef in the southern Great Barrier Reef, a ciguatera endemic region, in triplicate to determine the presence and patchiness of these species across samples from Chnoospora sp., Padina sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment Protocol Copyright © 2018 Kostoff Et Al
    Prevention and reversal of Alzheimer's disease: treatment protocol Copyright © 2018 Kostoff et al PREVENTION AND REVERSAL OF ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE: TREATMENT PROTOCOL by Ronald N. Kostoffa, Alan L. Porterb, Henry. A. Buchtelc (a) Research Affiliate, School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA (b) Professor Emeritus, School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA (c) Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, USA KEYWORDS Alzheimer's Disease; Dementia; Text Mining; Literature-Based Discovery; Information Technology; Treatments Prevention and reversal of Alzheimer's disease: treatment protocol Copyright © 2018 Kostoff et al CITATION TO MONOGRAPH Kostoff RN, Porter AL, Buchtel HA. Prevention and reversal of Alzheimer's disease: treatment protocol. Georgia Institute of Technology. 2018. PDF. https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/59311 COPYRIGHT AND CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE COPYRIGHT Copyright © 2018 by Ronald N. Kostoff, Alan L. Porter, Henry A. Buchtel Printed in the United States of America; First Printing, 2018 CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE This work can be copied and redistributed in any medium or format provided that credit is given to the original author. For more details on the CC BY license, see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License<http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/>. DISCLAIMERS The views in this monograph are solely those of the authors, and do not represent the views of the Georgia Institute of Technology or the University of Michigan. This monograph is not intended as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians. The reader should regularly consult a physician in matters relating to his/her health and particularly with respect to any symptoms that may require diagnosis or medical attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Anticancer Antibody-Drug Conjugates and Immunotoxins
    Send Orders for Reprints to [email protected] Recent Patents on Anti-Cancer Drug Discovery, 2014, 9, 35-65 35 Advances in Anticancer Antibody-Drug Conjugates and Immunotoxins Franco Dosio1,*, Barbara Stella1, Sofia Cerioni1, Daniela Gastaldi2 and Silvia Arpicco1 1Dipartimento di Scienza e Tecnologia del Farmaco, University of Torino, Torino, I-10125, Italy; 2Dipartimento di Bio- tecnologie Molecolari e Scienze per la Salute, University of Torino, Torino, I-10125, Italy Received: December 13, 2012; Accepted: February 21, 2013; Revised: March 7, 2013 Abstract: Antibody-delivered drugs and toxins are poised to become important classes of cancer therapeutics. These bio- pharmaceuticals have potential in this field, as they can selectively direct highly potent cytotoxic agents to cancer cells that present tumor-associated surface markers, thereby minimizing systemic toxicity. The activity of some conjugates is of particular interest receiving increasing attention, thanks to very promising clinical trial results in hematologic cancers. Over twenty antibody-drug conjugates and eight immunotoxins in clinical trials as well as some recently approved drugs, support the maturity of this approach. This review focuses on recent advances in the development of these two classes of biopharmaceuticals: conventional toxins and anticancer drugs, together with their mechanisms of action. The processes of conjugation and purification, as reported in the literature and in several patents, are discussed and the most relevant results in clinical trials are listed. Innovative technologies and preliminary results on novel drugs and toxins, as reported in the literature and in recently-published patents (up to February 2013) are lastly examined. Keywords: Antibody drug conjugate, anticancer agents, auristatins immunotoxin, calicheamicins, cross-linkers, duocarmycins, maytansinoids.
    [Show full text]
  • Tinnitus Hopes Put to Sleep by Latest Auris Failure
    March 14, 2018 Tinnitus hopes put to sleep by latest Auris failure Madeleine Armstrong Ketamine is best known as a horse tranquiliser or a recreational drug, but it has also been proposed as a treatment for various disorders from depression to Alzheimer’s. Hopes of developing the drug in tinnitus have been dashed by the failure of Auris’s Keyzilen in a second phase III trial. As well as leaving Auris’s future looking bleak – Keyzilen is the second of its phase III candidates to flunk in four months – the setback could also be bad news for the sparse tinnitus pipeline. According to EvaluatePharma there is only one other candidate in active clinical development, Otonomy’s OTO-313, and this uses the same mechanism of action as Keyzilen (see table below). Tinnitus pipeline Generic Project Company Pharma class Trial(s) Notes name Phase III Auris Esketamine TACTT2 Keyzilen NMDA antagonist Failed Aug 2016 Medical hydrochloride (NCT01803646) TACTT3 Failed Mar 2018 (NCT02040194) Phase I OTO- Phase I/II trial to OTO-311 abandoned in Otonomy NMDA antagonist Gacyclidine 313 start H1 2019 favour of this formulation Preclinical Auris AM-102 Undisclosed - - Medical KCNQ2 Knopp Kv7 potassium - - Program Biosciences channel modulator Source: EvaluatePharma. Both projects are psychoactive drugs targeting the NMDA receptor. Tinnitus is commonly caused by loud noise and resulting damage to the sensory hair cells in the cochlea. Initial trauma to the inner ear has been shown to trigger excess production of glutamate, which leads to the hyperactivation of NMDA receptors and, in turn, cell death. Blocking the NMDA receptor could therefore have a protective effect – but it is unclear how this mechanism would work once the damage to hair cells had been done.
    [Show full text]
  • (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub
    US 20130289061A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0289061 A1 Bhide et al. (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 31, 2013 (54) METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS TO Publication Classi?cation PREVENT ADDICTION (51) Int. Cl. (71) Applicant: The General Hospital Corporation, A61K 31/485 (2006-01) Boston’ MA (Us) A61K 31/4458 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. (72) Inventors: Pradeep G. Bhide; Peabody, MA (US); CPC """"" " A61K31/485 (201301); ‘4161223011? Jmm‘“ Zhu’ Ansm’ MA. (Us); USPC ......... .. 514/282; 514/317; 514/654; 514/618; Thomas J. Spencer; Carhsle; MA (US); 514/279 Joseph Biederman; Brookline; MA (Us) (57) ABSTRACT Disclosed herein is a method of reducing or preventing the development of aversion to a CNS stimulant in a subject (21) App1_ NO_; 13/924,815 comprising; administering a therapeutic amount of the neu rological stimulant and administering an antagonist of the kappa opioid receptor; to thereby reduce or prevent the devel - . opment of aversion to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Also (22) Flled' Jun‘ 24’ 2013 disclosed is a method of reducing or preventing the develop ment of addiction to a CNS stimulant in a subj ect; comprising; _ _ administering the CNS stimulant and administering a mu Related U‘s‘ Apphcatlon Data opioid receptor antagonist to thereby reduce or prevent the (63) Continuation of application NO 13/389,959, ?led on development of addiction to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Apt 27’ 2012’ ?led as application NO_ PCT/US2010/ Also disclosed are pharmaceutical compositions comprising 045486 on Aug' 13 2010' a central nervous system stimulant and an opioid receptor ’ antagonist.
    [Show full text]
  • AMATOXIN MUSHROOM POISONING in NORTH AMERICA 2015-2016 by Michael W
    VOLUME 57: 4 JULY-AUGUST 2017 www.namyco.org AMATOXIN MUSHROOM POISONING IN NORTH AMERICA 2015-2016 By Michael W. Beug: Chair, NAMA Toxicology Committee Assessing the degree of amatoxin mushroom poisoning in North America is very challenging. Understanding the potential for various treatment practices is even more daunting. Although I have been studying mushroom poisoning for 45 years now, my own views on potential best treatment practices are still evolving. While my training in enzyme kinetics helps me understand the literature about amatoxin poisoning treatments, my lack of medical training limits me. Fortunately, critical comments from six different medical doctors have been incorporated in this article. All six, each concerned about different aspects in early drafts, returned me to the peer reviewed scientific literature for additional reading. There remains no known specific antidote for amatoxin poisoning. There have not been any gold standard double-blind placebo controlled studies. There never can be. When dealing with a potentially deadly poisoning (where in many non-western countries the amatoxin fatality rate exceeds 50%) treating of half of all poisoning patients with a placebo would be unethical. Using amatoxins on large animals to test new treatments (theoretically a great alternative) has ethical constraints on the experimental design that would most likely obscure the answers researchers sought. We must thus make our best judgement based on analysis of past cases. Although that number is now large enough that we can make some good assumptions, differences of interpretation will continue. Nonetheless, we may be on the cusp of reaching some agreement. Towards that end, I have contacted several Poison Centers and NAMA will be working with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC).
    [Show full text]
  • Salicylate Induces Tinnitus Through Activation of Cochlear NMDA Receptors
    3944 • The Journal of Neuroscience, May 1, 2003 • 23(9):3944–3952 Salicylate Induces Tinnitus through Activation of Cochlear NMDA Receptors Matthieu J. Guitton,1 Jean Caston,2 Je´roˆme Ruel,1 Randolph M. Johnson,3 Re´my Pujol,1 and Jean-Luc Puel1 1Institut National de la Sante´ et de la Recherche Me´dicale UR-254, Laboratoire de Neurobiologie de l’Audition–Plasticite´ Synaptique, Faculte´deMe´decine, Universite´ de Montpellier 1, 34090 Montpellier, France, 2 Unite´ Propre de Recherche et de l’Enseignement Supe´rieur 1780, Laboratoire de Neurobiologie de l’Apprentissage, Universite´ de Rouen, 76821 Mont-Saint-Aignan, France, and 3DURECT Corporation, Cupertino, California 95014 Salicylate, the active component of aspirin, is known to induce tinnitus. However, the site and the mechanism of generation of tinnitus induced by salicylate remains unclear. Here, we developed a behavioral procedure to measure tinnitus in rats. The behavioral model was based on an active avoidance paradigm in which rats had to display a motor task (i.e., to jump on a climbing pole when hearing a sound). Giving salicylate led to a decrease in the percentage of correct responses (score) and a drastic increase in the number of false positive responses (i.e., animals execute the motor task during a silent period). Presentation of the sound at a constant perceptive level prevents decrease of the score, leading to the proposal that score is related to hearing performance. In contrast, the increase of false positive responses remained unchanged. In fact, animals behaved as if they hear a sound, indicating that they are experiencing tinnitus.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicological Profile for Toluene
    TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR TOLUENE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry September 2000 Additional Resources http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp56.html TOLUENE ii DISCLAIMER The use of company or product name(s) is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. TOLUENE iii UPDATE STATEMENT Toxicological profiles are revised and republished as necessary, but no less than once every three years. For information regarding the update status of previously released profiles, contact ATSDR at: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Toxicology/Toxicology Information Branch 1600 Clifton Road NE, E-29 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 TOLUENE vi *Legislative Background The toxicological profiles are developed in response to the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986 (Public law 99-499) which amended the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA or Superfund). This public law directed ATSDR to prepared toxicological profiles for hazardous substances most commonly found at facilities on the CERCLA National Priorities List and that pose the most significant potential threat to human health, as determined by ATSDR and the EPA. The availability of the revised priority list of 275 hazardous substances was announced in the Federal Register on October 21, 1999 (64 FR 56792). For prior versions of the list of substances, see Federal Register notices dated April 17, 1987 (52 FR 12866); October 20, 1988(53 FR 41280); October 26, 1989 (54 FR 43619); October 17, 1990 (55 FR 42067); October 17, 1991 (56 FR 52166); October 28, 1992 (57 FR 48801); February 28, 1994 (59 FR 9486); April 29, 1996 (61 FR 18744); and November 17, 1997 (62 FR 61332).
    [Show full text]
  • The Nutrition and Food Web Archive Medical Terminology Book
    The Nutrition and Food Web Archive Medical Terminology Book www.nafwa.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Gambierol 1 2 3 4 Makoto Sasaki, Eva Cagide, and 5 M
    34570 FM i-xviii.qxd 2/9/07 9:16 AM Page i PHYCOTOXINS Chemistry and Biochemistry 34570 FM i-xviii.qxd 2/9/07 9:16 AM Page iii PHYCOTOXINS Chemistry and Biochemistry Luis M. Botana Editor 34570 FM i-xviii.qxd 2/9/07 9:16 AM Page iv 1 2 3 Dr. Luis M. Botana is professor of Pharmacology, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain. His group is a 4 world leader in the development of new methods to monitor the presence of phycotoxins, having developed 5 methods to date for saxitoxins, yessotoxin, pectenotoxin, ciguatoxins, brevetoxins, okadaic acid and dinophy- 6 sistoxins. Dr. Botana is the editor of Seafood and Freshwater Toxins: Pharmacology, Physiology and Detection, 7 to date the only comprehensive reference book entirely devoted to marine toxins. 8 ©2007 Blackwell Publishing 9 All rights reserved 10 1 Blackwell Publishing Professional 2 2121 State Avenue, Ames, Iowa 50014, USA 3 4 Orders: 1-800-862-6657 5 Office: 1-515-292-0140 6 Fax: 1-515-292-3348 7 Web site: www.blackwellprofessional.com 8 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 9 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK 20 Tel.: +44 (0)1865 776868 1 2 Blackwell Publishing Asia 3 550 Swanston Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia 4 Tel.: +61 (0)3 8359 1011 5 6 Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, 7 is granted by Blackwell Publishing, provided that the base fee is paid directly to the Copyright Clearance Cen- 8 ter, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923.
    [Show full text]