DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:0801.0028V1 [Physics.Atom-Ph] 29 Dec 2007 § ‡ † (People’S China Metrology, Of) of Lic Institute Canada National Council, Zhang, Research Z

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants: 2006∗ Peter J. Mohr†, Barry N. Taylor‡, and David B. Newell§, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8420, USA (Dated: March 29, 2012) This paper gives the 2006 self-consistent set of values of the basic constants and conversion factors of physics and chemistry recommended by the Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA) for international use. Further, it describes in detail the adjustment of the values of the constants, including the selection of the final set of input data based on the results of least-squares analyses. The 2006 adjustment takes into account the data considered in the 2002 adjustment as well as the data that became available between 31 December 2002, the closing date of that adjustment, and 31 December 2006, the closing date of the new adjustment. The new data have led to a significant reduction in the uncertainties of many recommended values. The 2006 set replaces the previously recommended 2002 CODATA set and may also be found on the World Wide Web at physics.nist.gov/constants. Contents 3. Cyclotron resonance measurement of the electron relative atomic mass Ar(e) 8 Glossary 2 4. Atomic transition frequencies 8 1. Introduction 4 1. Hydrogen and deuterium transition frequencies, the 1. Background 4 Rydberg constant R∞, and the proton and deuteron charge radii R , R 8 2. Time variation of the constants 5 p d 1. Theory relevant to the Rydberg constant 9 3. Outline of paper 5 2. Experiments on hydrogen and deuterium 16 3. Nuclear radii 16 2. Special quantities and units 6 2. Antiprotonic helium transition frequencies and Ar(e) 17 1. Theory relevant to antiprotonic helium 17 3. Relative atomic masses 6 2. Experiments on antiprotonic helium 18 1. Relative atomic masses of atoms 6 3. Values of Ar(e) inferred from antiprotonic helium 20 2. Relative atomic masses of ions and nuclei 7 3. Hyperfine structure and fine structure 20 1. Hyperfine structure 20 2. Fine structure 20 ∗This report was prepared by the authors under the auspices of the 5. Magnetic moment anomalies and g-factors 21 CODATA Task Group on Fundamental Constants. The members 1. Electron magnetic moment anomaly ae and the of the task group are: fine-structure constant α 22 F. Cabiati, Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica, Italy 1. Theory of ae 22 K. Fujii, National Metrology Institute of Japan, Japan 2. Measurements of ae 23 S. G. Karshenboim, D. I. Mendeleyev All-Russian Research Insti- 3. Values of α inferred from ae 24 tute for Metrology, Russian Federation 2. Muon magnetic moment anomaly aµ 24 I. Lindgren, Chalmers University of Technology and G¨oteborg Uni- 1. Theory of aµ 24 versity, Sweden 2. Measurement of aµ: Brookhaven. 26 B. A. Mamyrin (deceased), A. F. Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute, 3. Bound electron g-factor in 12C5+ and in 16O7+ and Russian Federation Ar(e) 27 W. Martienssen, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universit¨at, Germany 1. Theory of the bound electron g-factor 28 12 5+ 16 7+ P. J. Mohr, National Institute of Standards and Technology, United 2. Measurements of ge( C ) and ge( O ). 31 arXiv:0801.0028v1 [physics.atom-ph] 29 Dec 2007 States of America D. B. Newell, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 6. Magnetic moment ratios and the muon-electron United States of America mass ratio 32 F. Nez, Laboratoire Kastler-Brossel, France 1. Magnetic moment ratios 32 B. W. Petley, National Physical Laboratory, United Kingdom 1. Theoretical ratios of atomic bound-particle to T. J. Quinn, Bureau international des poids et mesures free-particle g-factors 33 B. N. Taylor, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2. Ratio measurements 33 United States of America 2. Muonium transition frequencies, the muon-proton W. W¨oger, Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Germany magnetic moment ratio µµ/µp, and muon-electron mass B. M. Wood, National Research Council, Canada ratio mµ/me 36 Z. Zhang, National Institute of Metrology, China (People’s Repub- 1. Theory of the muonium ground-state hyperfine lic of) splitting 36 2. Measurements of muonium transition frequencies and † Electronic address: [email protected] values of µµ/µp and mµ/me 38 ‡Electronic address: [email protected] §Electronic address: [email protected] 7. Electrical measurements 39 2 1. Shielded gyromagnetic ratios γ ′, the fine-structure 3. Outlook and suggestions for future work 86 constant α, and the Planck constant h 39 1. Low-field measurements 40 15. Acknowledgments 87 2. High-field measurements 40 2. von Klitzing constant RK and α 41 References 87 1. NIST: Calculable capacitor 41 2. NMI: Calculable capacitor 41 3. NPL: Calculable capacitor 42 Glossary 4. NIM: Calculable capacitor 42 5. LNE: Calculable capacitor 42 3. Josephson constant KJ and h 42 1. NMI: Hg electrometer 43 AMDC Atomic Mass Data Center, Centre de Spec- 2. PTB: Capacitor voltage balance 43 trom´etrie Nucl´eaire et de Spectrom´etrie de Masse 2 (CSNSM), Orsay, France 4. Product KJ RK and h 43 1. NPL: Watt balance 43 AME2003 2003 atomic mass evaluation of the AMDC 2. NIST: Watt balance 43 Ar(X) Relative atomic mass of X: Ar(X)= m(X)/mu 3. Other values 45 A90 Conventional unit of electric current: 4. Inferred value of KJ 45 A90 = V90/Ω 90 5. Faraday constant F and h 46 ∗ ∗ A˚ Angstr¨om-star:˚ λ(WKα1) = 0.209 010 0 A˚ 1. NIST: Ag coulometer 46 ae Electron magnetic moment anomaly: 8. Measurements involving silicon crystals 46 ae =( ge 2)/2 µ | |− 1. {220} lattice spacing of silicon d220 46 a Muon magnetic moment anomaly: 1. X-ray/optical interferometer measurements of aµ =( gµ 2)/2 | |− d220(X) 47 BIPM International Bureau of Weights and Measures, 2. d220 difference measurements 49 S`evres, France 2. Molar volume of silicon Vm(Si) and the Avogadro BNL Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New constant NA 50 York, USA 3. Gamma-ray determination of the neutron relative CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, atomic mass A (n) 51 r Geneva, Switzerland 4. Quotient of Planck constant and particle mass h/m(X) and α 52 CIPM International Committee for Weights and 1. Quotient h/mn 52 Measures 2. Quotient h/m(133Cs) 53 CODATA Committee on Data for Science and Technology 3. Quotient h/m(87Rb) 54 of the International Council for Science CPT Combined charge conjugation, parity inversion, 9. Thermal physical quantities 55 and time reversal 1. Molar gas constant R 55 c Speed of light in vacuum 1. NIST: speed of sound in argon 55 cw Continuous wave 2. NPL: speed of sound in argon 55 d Deuteron (nucleus of deuterium D, or 2H) 3. Other values 55 d220 220 lattice spacing of an ideal crystal of natu- 2. Boltzmann constant k 55 { } 3. Stefan-Boltzmann constant σ 56 rally occurring silicon d220(X) 220 lattice spacing of crystal X of naturally oc- 10. Newtonian constant of gravitation G 56 curring{ } silicon 1. Updated values 57 Eb Binding energy 1. Huazhong University of Science and Technology 57 e Symbol for either member of the electron-positron 2. University of Zurich 58 pair; when necessary, e− or e+ is used to indicate 2. Determination of 2006 recommended value of G 58 the electron or positron 3. Prospective values 59 e Elementary charge: absolute value of the charge 11. X-ray and electroweak quantities 59 of the electron 1. X-ray units 59 F Faraday constant: F = NAe 2. Particle Data Group input 60 FCDC Fundamental Constants Data Center, NIST, USA FSU Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany 12. Analysis of Data 60 90 90 =(F/A90) A 1. Comparison of data 64 GF NewtonianF constant of gravitation 2. Multivariate analysis of data 69 g Local acceleration of free fall 1. Summary of adjustments 70 g Deuteron g-factor: g = µ /µ 2. Test of the Josephson and quantum Hall effect d d d N relations 71 ge Electron g-factor: ge = 2µe/µB gp Proton g-factor: gp = 2µp/µN ′ ′ ′ 13. The 2006 CODATA recommended values 83 gp Shielded proton g-factor: gp = 2µp/µN 1. Calculational details 83 gt Triton g-factor: gt = 2µt/µN 2. Tables of values 83 gX (Y ) g-factor of particle X in the ground (1S) state of hydrogenic atom Y 14. Summary and Conclusion 84 gµ Muon g-factor: gµ = 2µµ/(e¯h/2mµ) 1. Comparison of 2006 and 2002 CODATA recommended GSI Gesellschaft f¨ur Schwerionenforschung, Darm- values 84 2. Some implications of the 2006 CODATA recommended stadt, Germany values and adjustment for physics and metrology 85 3 HD HD molecule (bound state of hydrogen and deu- p Proton terium atoms) p AHe+ Antiprotonic helium (AHe+ + p atom, A = HT HT molecule (bound state of hydrogen and tri- 3 or 4) tium atoms) QED Quantum electrodynamics h Helion (nucleus of 3He) Q(χ2 ν) Probability that an observed value of chi-square h Planck constant; ¯h = h/2π | for ν degrees of freedom would exceed χ2 Harvard; Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, R Molar gas constant HarvU USA R Ratio of muon anomaly difference frequency to ILL Institut Max von Laue-Paul Langevin, Grenoble, free proton NMR frequency France 2 1 RB Birge ratio: RB =(χ /ν) 2 IMGC Istituto di Metrologia “T. Colonetti,” Torino, Rd; Rd Bound-state rms charge radius of the deuteron Italy 2 RK von Klitzing constant: RK = h/e INRIM Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica, Torino, RK−90 Conventional value of the von Klitzing constant Italy RK: RK−90 = 25 812.807 Ω IRMM Institute for Reference Materials and Measure- Rp; Rp Bound-state rms charge radius of the proton ments, Geel, Belgium 2 R∞ Rydberg constant: R∞ = mecα /2h JINR Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Rus- r(xi,xj ) Correlation coefficient of estimated values xi and sian Federation xj : r(xi,xj )= u(xi,xj )/[u(xi)u(xj )] KRISS Korea Research Institute of Standards and Sci- ri Normalized residual of xi: ri = (xi xˆi)/u(xi), ence, Taedok Science Town, Republic of Korea − xˆi is the adjusted value of xi KR/VN KRISS-VNIIM collaboration rms Root mean square KJ Josephson constant: KJ = 2e/h Sc Self-sensitivity coefficient KJ−90 Conventional value of the Josephson constant KJ: −1 SI Syst`eme international d’unit´es (International Sys- KJ−90 = 483 597.9 GHz V tem of Units) k Boltzmann constant: k = R/NA Stanford; Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA LAMPF Clinton P.
Recommended publications
  • 2019 Redefinition of SI Base Units

    2019 Redefinition of SI Base Units

    2019 redefinition of SI base units A redefinition of SI base units is scheduled to come into force on 20 May 2019.[1][2] The kilogram, ampere, kelvin, and mole will then be defined by setting exact numerical values for the Planck constant (h), the elementary electric charge (e), the Boltzmann constant (k), and the Avogadro constant (NA), respectively. The metre and candela are already defined by physical constants, subject to correction to their present definitions. The new definitions aim to improve the SI without changing the size of any units, thus ensuring continuity with existing measurements.[3][4] In November 2018, the 26th General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM) unanimously approved these changes,[5][6] which the International Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM) had proposed earlier that year.[7]:23 The previous major change of the metric system was in 1960 when the International System of Units (SI) was formally published. The SI is a coherent system structured around seven base units whose definitions are unconstrained by that of any other unit and another twenty-two named units derived from these base units. The metre was redefined in terms of the wavelength of a spectral line of a The SI system after the 2019 redefinition: krypton-86 radiation,[Note 1] making it derivable from universal natural Dependence of base unit definitions onphysical constants with fixed numerical values and on other phenomena, but the kilogram remained defined in terms of a physical prototype, base units. leaving it the only artefact upon which the SI unit definitions depend. The metric system was originally conceived as a system of measurement that was derivable from unchanging phenomena,[8] but practical limitations necessitated the use of artefacts (the prototype metre and prototype kilogram) when the metric system was first introduced in France in 1799.
  • Conventioral Standards?* JESSE W

    Conventioral Standards?* JESSE W

    156 IRE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION December Present Status of Precise Information on the Universal Physical Constants. Has the Time Arrived for Their Adoption to Replace Our Present Arbitrary Conventioral Standards?* JESSE W. M. DuMONDt INTRODUCTION this subject that the experimentally measured data r HREE years ago Dr. E. R. Cohen and I prepared often do not give the desired unknowns directly but and published our latest (1955) least-squares ad- instead give functions of the unknowns. justment of all the most reliable data then avail- Seven different functions of these above four un- able bearing on the universal constants of physics and knowns have been measured by experimental methods chemistry. Since then new data and information have which we feel are sufficiently precise and reliable to been accumulating so that a year or two from now the qualify them as input data in a least-squares adjust- time may perhaps be propitious for us to prepare a new ment. These seven experimentally determined numeri- adjustment taking the newly-gained knowledge into cal values are not only functions of the unknowns,ae, account. At present it is too early to attempt such a e, N, and A, but also of the above-mentioned experi re-evaluation since many of the investigations and re- mentally determined auxiliary constants, of which five determinations now under way are still far from com- different kinds are listed in Table I. Another of these pleted. I shall be obliged, therefore, to content myself auxiliary constants I find it expedient to recall to your in this talk with a description of the sources of informa- attention at the very beginning to avoid any possibility tion upon which our 1955 evaluation was based, men- of confusion.
  • NMR Chemical Shifts of Common Laboratory Solvents As Trace Impurities

    NMR Chemical Shifts of Common Laboratory Solvents As Trace Impurities

    7512 J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7512-7515 NMR Chemical Shifts of Common Laboratory Solvents as Trace Impurities Hugo E. Gottlieb,* Vadim Kotlyar, and Abraham Nudelman* Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel Received June 27, 1997 In the course of the routine use of NMR as an aid for organic chemistry, a day-to-day problem is the identifica- tion of signals deriving from common contaminants (water, solvents, stabilizers, oils) in less-than-analyti- cally-pure samples. This data may be available in the literature, but the time involved in searching for it may be considerable. Another issue is the concentration dependence of chemical shifts (especially 1H); results obtained two or three decades ago usually refer to much Figure 1. Chemical shift of HDO as a function of tempera- more concentrated samples, and run at lower magnetic ture. fields, than today’s practice. 1 13 We therefore decided to collect H and C chemical dependent (vide infra). Also, any potential hydrogen- shifts of what are, in our experience, the most popular bond acceptor will tend to shift the water signal down- “extra peaks” in a variety of commonly used NMR field; this is particularly true for nonpolar solvents. In solvents, in the hope that this will be of assistance to contrast, in e.g. DMSO the water is already strongly the practicing chemist. hydrogen-bonded to the solvent, and solutes have only a negligible effect on its chemical shift. This is also true Experimental Section for D2O; the chemical shift of the residual HDO is very NMR spectra were taken in a Bruker DPX-300 instrument temperature-dependent (vide infra) but, maybe counter- (300.1 and 75.5 MHz for 1H and 13C, respectively).
  • The Discovery of Thermodynamics

    The Discovery of Thermodynamics

    Philosophical Magazine ISSN: 1478-6435 (Print) 1478-6443 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tphm20 The discovery of thermodynamics Peter Weinberger To cite this article: Peter Weinberger (2013) The discovery of thermodynamics, Philosophical Magazine, 93:20, 2576-2612, DOI: 10.1080/14786435.2013.784402 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2013.784402 Published online: 09 Apr 2013. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 658 Citing articles: 2 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tphm20 Philosophical Magazine, 2013 Vol. 93, No. 20, 2576–2612, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2013.784402 COMMENTARY The discovery of thermodynamics Peter Weinberger∗ Center for Computational Nanoscience, Seilerstätte 10/21, A1010 Vienna, Austria (Received 21 December 2012; final version received 6 March 2013) Based on the idea that a scientific journal is also an “agora” (Greek: market place) for the exchange of ideas and scientific concepts, the history of thermodynamics between 1800 and 1910 as documented in the Philosophical Magazine Archives is uncovered. Famous scientists such as Joule, Thomson (Lord Kelvin), Clau- sius, Maxwell or Boltzmann shared this forum. Not always in the most friendly manner. It is interesting to find out, how difficult it was to describe in a scientific (mathematical) language a phenomenon like “heat”, to see, how long it took to arrive at one of the fundamental principles in physics: entropy. Scientific progress started from the simple rule of Boyle and Mariotte dating from the late eighteenth century and arrived in the twentieth century with the concept of probabilities.
  • Fundamental Physical Constants — Extensive Listing Relative Std

    Fundamental Physical Constants — Extensive Listing Relative Std

    2018 CODATA adjustment From: http://physics.nist.gov/constants Fundamental Physical Constants — Extensive Listing Relative std. Quantity Symbol Value Unit uncert. ur UNIVERSAL speed of light in vacuum c 299 792 458 m s−1 exact 2 −6 −2 −10 vacuum magnetic permeability 4pα¯h=e c µ0 1:256 637 062 12(19) × 10 NA 1:5 × 10 −7 −2 −10 µ0=(4p × 10 ) 1:000 000 000 55(15) NA 1:5 × 10 2 −12 −1 −10 vacuum electric permittivity 1/µ0c 0 8:854 187 8128(13) × 10 F m 1:5 × 10 −10 characteristic impedance of vacuum µ0c Z0 376:730 313 668(57) Ω 1:5 × 10 Newtonian constant of gravitation G 6:674 30(15) × 10−11 m3 kg−1 s−2 2:2 × 10−5 G=¯hc 6:708 83(15) × 10−39 (GeV=c2)−2 2:2 × 10−5 Planck constant∗ h 6:626 070 15 × 10−34 J Hz−1 exact 4:135 667 696 ::: × 10−15 eV Hz−1 exact ¯h 1:054 571 817 ::: × 10−34 J s exact 6:582 119 569 ::: × 10−16 eV s exact ¯hc 197:326 980 4 ::: MeV fm exact 1=2 −8 −5 Planck mass (¯hc=G) mP 2:176 434(24) × 10 kg 1:1 × 10 2 19 −5 energy equivalent mPc 1:220 890(14) × 10 GeV 1:1 × 10 5 1=2 32 −5 Planck temperature (¯hc =G) =k TP 1:416 784(16) × 10 K 1:1 × 10 3 1=2 −35 −5 Planck length ¯h=mPc = (¯hG=c ) lP 1:616 255(18) × 10 m 1:1 × 10 5 1=2 −44 −5 Planck time lP=c = (¯hG=c ) tP 5:391 247(60) × 10 s 1:1 × 10 ELECTROMAGNETIC elementary charge e 1:602 176 634 × 10−19 C exact e=¯h 1:519 267 447 ::: × 1015 AJ−1 exact −15 magnetic flux quantum 2p¯h=(2e) Φ0 2:067 833 848 ::: × 10 Wb exact 2 −5 conductance quantum 2e =2p¯h G0 7:748 091 729 ::: × 10 S exact −1 inverse of conductance quantum G0 12 906:403 72 ::: Ω exact 9 −1 Josephson constant 2e=h
  • Fundamental Constants

    Fundamental Constants

    Appendix A Fundamental Constants Table A.1 Fundamental constants Quantity & symbol CGS MKS (SI) Speed of light in vacuum c 2.997925 1010 cm sec−1 108 ms−1 −7 −6 −1 Magnetic constant μ0 = 4π × 10 1.25664 10 Hm (permeability of free space) 2 −12 −1 Electric constant 0 = 1/μ0c 8.8541853 10 Fm (permittivity of free space) Electron charge e 1.60219 10−19 C 4.80324 10−10 esu Electron volt eV 1.60219 10−12 erg eV−1 10−19 JeV−1 −28 −31 Electron rest mass m0 9.10956 10 gm 10 kg Planck’s constant h 6.626196 10−27 erg sec 10−34 Js Planck’s constant = h/2π 1.05459 10−27 erg sec 10−34 Js 2 2 −8 −10 Bohr radius a0 = 4π0 /m0e 0.529177 10 cm 10 m = 2 2 Rydberg constant Ry /2m0a0 13.6058 eV eV Fine structure constant 7.297351 10−3 10−3 2 α = e /20hc 23 −1 23 −1 Avogadro’s constant L,NA 6.022169 10 mol 10 mol 25 −3 Loschmidt’s constant NL 2.68719 10 m −16 −1 −23 −1 Boltzmann’s constant kB = R/L 1.380622 10 erg K 10 JK Faraday constant F = Le 9.64867 104 Cmol−1 7 −1 −1 −1 −1 Universal gas constant R = LkB 8.31435 10 erg K mol JK mol Mechanical equivalent of heat 4.184 107 erg cal−1 J cal−1 −21 −1 −24 −1 Bohr magneton μB = e/2m0c 9.2741 10 erg G 10 JT −24 −27 Proton rest mass mp 1.67251 10 gm 10 kg −24 −1 −27 −1 Nuclear magneton μN = e/2mpc 5.0508 10 erg G 10 JT −24 −27 Neutron rest mass mn 1.67492 10 gm 10 kg Stefan-Boltzmann constant 5.6697 10−8 Wm−2 K−4 = 5 4 3 2 σ 2π kB /15h c Y.
  • Molar Mass 1 Molar Mass

    Molar Mass 1 Molar Mass

    Molar mass 1 Molar mass In chemistry, the molar mass is a physical property. It is defined as the mass of a given substance (chemical element or chemical compound) divided by its amount of substance. The base SI unit for molar mass is kg/mol. However, for historical reasons, molar masses are almost always expressed in g/mol. As an example, the molar mass of water is approximately: M(H O) ≈ 18 g⋅mol−1 2 Molar masses of elements The molar mass of atoms of an element is given by the atomic mass of the element multiplied by the molar mass constant, M −3 u = 1×10 kg/mol = 1 g/mol: M(H) = 1.007 97(7) × 1 g/mol = 1.007 97(7) g/mol M(S) = 32.065(5) × 1 g/mol = 32.065(5) g/mol M(Cl) = 35.453(2) × 1 g/mol = 35.453(2) g/mol M(Fe) = 55.845(2) × 1 g/mol = 55.845(2) g/mol. Multiplying by the molar mass constant ensures that the calculation is dimensionally correct: atomic weights are dimensionless quantities (i.e., pure numbers) whereas molar masses have units (in this case, grams/mole). Some elements are usually encountered as molecules, e.g. hydrogen (H 2), sulfur (S 8), chlorine (Cl 2). The molar mass of molecules of these elements is the molar mass of the atoms multiplied by the number of atoms in each molecule: M(H 2) = 2 × 1.007 97(7) × 1 g/mol = 2.015 88(14) g/mol M(S 8) = 8 × 32.065(5) × 1 g/mol = 256.52(4) g/mol M(Cl 2) = 2 × 35.453(2) × 1 g/mol = 70.906(4) g/mol.
  • Fundamental Physical Constants — Complete Listing Relative Std

    Fundamental Physical Constants — Complete Listing Relative Std

    From: http://physics.nist.gov/constants Fundamental Physical Constants — Complete Listing Relative std. Quantity Symbol Value Unit uncert. ur UNIVERSAL 1 speed of light in vacuum c; c0 299 792 458 m s− (exact) 7 2 magnetic constant µ0 4π 10− NA− × 7 2 = 12:566 370 614::: 10− NA− (exact) 2 × 12 1 electric constant 1/µ0c "0 8:854 187 817::: 10− F m− (exact) characteristic impedance × of vacuum µ / = µ c Z 376:730 313 461::: Ω (exact) p 0 0 0 0 Newtonian constant 11 3 1 2 3 of gravitation G 6:673(10) 10− m kg− s− 1:5 10− × 39 2 2 × 3 G=¯hc 6:707(10) 10− (GeV=c )− 1:5 10− × 34 × 8 Planck constant h 6:626 068 76(52) 10− J s 7:8 10− × 15 × 8 in eV s 4:135 667 27(16) 10− eV s 3:9 10− × 34 × 8 h=2π ¯h 1:054 571 596(82) 10− J s 7:8 10− × 16 × 8 in eV s 6:582 118 89(26) 10− eV s 3:9 10− × × 1=2 8 4 Planck mass (¯hc=G) mP 2:1767(16) 10− kg 7:5 10− 3 1=2 × 35 × 4 Planck length ¯h=mPc = (¯hG=c ) lP 1:6160(12) 10− m 7:5 10− 5 1=2 × 44 × 4 Planck time lP=c = (¯hG=c ) tP 5:3906(40) 10− s 7:5 10− × × ELECTROMAGNETIC 19 8 elementary charge e 1:602 176 462(63) 10− C 3:9 10− × 14 1 × 8 e=h 2:417 989 491(95) 10 AJ− 3:9 10− × × 15 8 magnetic flux quantum h=2e Φ0 2:067 833 636(81) 10− Wb 3:9 10− 2 × 5 × 9 conductance quantum 2e =h G0 7:748 091 696(28) 10− S 3:7 10− 1 × × 9 inverse of conductance quantum G0− 12 906:403 786(47) Ω 3:7 10− a 9 1 × 8 Josephson constant 2e=h KJ 483 597:898(19) 10 Hz V− 3:9 10− von Klitzing constantb × × 2 9 h=e = µ0c=2α RK 25 812:807 572(95) Ω 3:7 10− × 26 1 8 Bohr magneton e¯h=2me µB 927:400 899(37) 10− JT− 4:0 10− 1 × 5 1 × 9 in
  • NMR Spectroscopy Introduction NMR Spectroscopy Is an Analytical Method for Determining the Structure of Organic Compounds

    NMR Spectroscopy Introduction NMR Spectroscopy Is an Analytical Method for Determining the Structure of Organic Compounds

    NMR Spectroscopy Introduction NMR Spectroscopy is an analytical method for determining the structure of organic compounds. Specifically, NMR spectroscopy provides information about the carbon skeleton of an organic molecule. Only elements with an odd number of protons or neutrons in its nucleus can be analyzed by NMR spectroscopy. The most useful type of NMR analyses are proton (1H) and carbon-13 (13C) NMR spectroscopy (Carbon-13 is an isotope of the more naturally abundant carbon 12). We will only study proton NMR spectroscopy. In proton NMR spectroscopy, only H atoms give rise to peaks in the spectrum. Sample Preparation Samples (both solids and liquids) for one-dimensional NMR spectroscopic analysis are usually dissolved in a solvent. Only organic solvents which do not contain H atoms can be used in NMR spectroscopy, otherwise peaks from the solvent will appear in the spectrum. Frequently, deuterated organic solvents are used, which means all of the H atoms of those solvents are replaced by deuterium, the 2H isotope of H, which is not detectable in NMR spectroscopy. Some common solvents that are used for NMR spectroscopic analysis are listed in Table 6.3. Compounds must be completely soluble in the solvent for NMR analysis. Solvent Molecular Formula Carbon tetrachloride CCl4 Deuterated chloroform CDCl3 Deuterated acetone CD6O Deuterated dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) CD6SO Deuterated methanol CD3OD Table 6.3: Common Solvents Used for NMR Analysis Appearance of the Proton NMR Spectrum Shown below in Figure 6.1 is a typical, one-dimensional proton NMR spectrum. (The term “spectrum” is the singular form of the word; “spectra” is the plural form of the word.) Two-dimensional spectra or NMR spectra of other atoms (i.e., 13C ) look different.
  • Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance ( H NMR)

    Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance ( H NMR)

    Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (1H NMR) Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (proton NMR, hydrogen-1 NMR, or 1H NMR) is the application of nuclear magnetic resonance in NMR spectroscopy with respect to hydrogen-1 nuclei within the molecules of a substance, in order to determine the structure of its molecules. In samples where natural hydrogen (H) is used, practically all the hydrogen consists of the isotope 1H. A full 1H atom is called protium. Solvents used in NMR., Deuterated solvents especially for use in NMR are preferred, e.g. deuterated water, D2O, deuterated acetone, (CD3)2CO, deuterated methanol, CD3OD, deuterated dimethyl sulfoxide, (CD3)2SO, and deuterated chloroform, CDCl3. However, a solvent without hydrogen, such as carbon tetrachloride, CCl4 or carbon disulfide, CS2, may also be used. Proton NMR spectra of most organic compounds are characterized by chemical shifts in the range +14 to -4 ppm and by spin-spin coupling between protons. The integration curve for each proton reflects the abundance of the individual protons. Simple molecules have simple spectra. The spectrum of ethyl chloride consists of a triplet at 1.5 ppm and a quartet at 3.5 ppm in a 3:2 ratio. The spectrum of benzene consists of a single peak at 7.2 ppm due to the diamagnetic ring current. Multiplicity Multiplicity or coupling is useful because it reveals how many hydrogens are on the next carbon in the structure. That information helps to put an entire structure together piece 1 by piece. In ethanol, CH3CH2OH, the methyl group is attached to a methylene group. The H spectrum of ethanol shows this relationship through the shape of the peaks.
  • GC-MS) Techniques and Selected Ion Flow Tube Mass Spectrometry (SIFT-MS) Assessment of Volatiles Produced from Nitric Oxide Producing Smart Dressings

    GC-MS) Techniques and Selected Ion Flow Tube Mass Spectrometry (SIFT-MS) Assessment of Volatiles Produced from Nitric Oxide Producing Smart Dressings

    The detection of trace volatiles from complex matrices using gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) techniques and selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS) assessment of volatiles produced from nitric oxide producing smart dressings Oliver John Gould A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of the West of England, Bristol for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol 2019 Copyright declaration This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgment. i Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisors Professor Norman Ratcliffe, and Associate Professor Ben de Lacy Costello for all their help, guidance, and support over the course of this work, and for their co-authorship on the published versions of chapters 2 and 3. I would also like to thank Dr Hugh Munro and Edixomed Ltd for financial support and scientific guidance with chapter 4. I would like to thank my co-authors on the publication of chapter 2 Tom Wieczorek, Professor Raj Persad. Also thank you to my co-authors on the publication of chapter 3, Amy Smart, Dr Angus Macmaster, and Dr Karen Ransley; and express my appreciation to Givaudan for funding the work undertaken in chapter 3. Thank you also to my colleagues and fellow post graduate research students at the University of the West of England for always being on hand for discussion and generation of ideas. A special mention to Dr Peter Jones who has been mentoring me on mass spectrometry for a number of years.
  • List of Symbols

    List of Symbols

    Appendix A List of Symbols For convenience, many symbols frequently used in the text are listed below alphabetically. Some of the symbols may play a dual role, in which case the meaning should be obvious from the context. A number in parentheses refers to an Eq. number (or the text or footnote near that Eq. number) in which the symbol is defined or appears for the first time; in a few cases a page number, Table number, Sect. number, footnote (fn.) number, or Fig. number is given instead. Quantum number is abbreviated as q. n. Quantum numbers (atomic): Symbol Description Eq. No. j D l ˙ s Inner q. n. of an electron (3.13) J D L C S Inner (total angular momentum) q. n. of a state (5.51b) l P Azimuthal (orbital) q. n. of an electron (3.1) and (3.2) L D l Azimuthal (orbital) q. n. of a state (5.51c) ml Magnetic orbital q. n. of an electron (3.1) ms Magnetic spin q. n. of an electron (3.1) M Total magnetic q. n. (5.51d) n Principal q. n. of an electron (3.1) s P Spin q. n. of an electron (3.13) S D s Spin q. n. of a state (5.51e) Relativistic azimuthal q. n. of an electron (3.15a) and (3.15b) Relativistic magnetic q. n. of an electron (3.18a) and (3.18b) W.F. Huebner and W.D. Barfield, Opacity, Astrophysics and Space Science Library 402, 457 DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-8797-5, © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014 458 Appendix A: List of Symbols Quantum numbers (molecular)1: Symbol Description Eq.