DOCSLIB.ORG

Student End of Term Status Edits 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Student End of Term Status Edits 1 2020-21 WDIS Student End of Term Status Edits 1. (REVISED 2021) District Number, Current Instruction/Services must be numeric in the range 01-7068 or 72-76 71-75 and must be correct for the district submitting the data. –record rejected- 2. School Number, Current Instruction/Service must be numeric in the range 0001 to 9899 and exist on the Master School Identification file as a valid school number in the district of enrollment. -record rejected- 3. Deleted 05/2020.The first nine positions of Student Number Identifier, Florida must be numeric. The tenth position of Student Number Identifier, Florida must either be an "X" or numeric. If the tenth position of Student Number Identifier, Florida is numeric, the first two digits must be a valid district number in the range 01-76. If the tenth position of the Student Number Identifier, Florida is an “X”, the first three positions may not all be zeroes. Note: For additional information on Student Number Identifier, Florida refer to DOE Information Database Requirements: Volume I -- Automated Student Information System Manual. -recordrejected - 4. Survey Period Code must be F, W, or S and must be correct for the submission specified by the district. -record rejected- 5. WDIS Reporting Year must be correct for the submission specified by thedistrict. -record rejected- 6. The Transaction Code must be A, C, or D. For the original transmission, only A is valid. For subsequent batch/update submissions, if A is specified then the record must not already exist on the database; if C or D is specified then the record must exist on the database. -record rejected- 7. (REVISED 2021) Each WDIS Student End of Term Status record must be unique based on the keys of District Number, Current Instruction/Service; Student Number Identifier, Florida; Florida Education Identifier; Survey Period Code; WDIS Reporting Year; and Grade Level. If more than one WDIS Student End of Term Status record is submitted for a student, only one record with Grade Level = 0906-12 will be accepted and only one record with Grade Level = 30 or 31 will be accepted. -record rejected- 8. (REVISED 2021 as of 05/2021) If Survey = F or S the Diploma Type must be W06, W07, W10, W27, WGA, WGD, W43, W45, W52, W54, W55, W58, W59, W60, W61, W62, W63, WCO, WD1, WFT, WFW, WRW, WWE, WWT, WWW, WXL, WXT, WXW or ZZZ. Else if Survey is W not F Diploma Type must be W06, W07, W10, W27, WGA, WGD, W43, W45, W52, W54, W55, W58, W59, W61, W62, W63, WD1, WFT, WFW, WRW, WWE, WWT, WWW, WXL, WXT, WXW or ZZZ. –record rejected- 9. Certificate of Completion, Type must be W08, W8A, W8B, W09, W44, W53, W56, or ZZZ. –record rejected- 10. Florida Education Identifier (FLEID) is alphanumeric and must be entered as “FL” in the first 2 positions followed by twelve numeric digits and must be greater than FL000000002000. No blanks or spaces are allowable. -record rejected- 11. Deleted. (NEW 2021) Item 3 - Filler on this format in position numbers 7-16 must be all spaces. -record rejected- 12. Deleted 7/02. 13. (REVISED 2021) Grade Level code must be 0906-12, 30, or 31. -recordrejected - 14. Deleted 2015-16 2020-21 WDIS Student End of Term Status Edits 15. Deleted. 16. Deleted 2017-18. 17. Deleted 2017-18. 18. Deleted 7/02. 19. Deleted 7/02 20. Deleted 7/02. 21. (REVISED 2021 as of 05/2021) If Survey = F or S and Diploma Type is W06, W07, W10, W27, WCO, WD1, WGA, WGD, WFT, WFW, WRW, WWE, WWT, WWW, WXL, WXT, or WXW, Grade Level must be one of the grades 09 06-12. Else if Survey is W not F and Diploma Type is W06, W07, W10, W27, WD1, WGA, WGD, WFT, WFW, WRW, WWE, WWT, WWW, WXL, WXT, or WXW, Grade Level must be one of the grades 0906-12. -record rejected- 22. (REVISED 2021) If Certificate of Completion, Type is W08, W8A, W8B, W8C, orW09, Grade Level must be one of the grades 0906-12. -record rejected- 23. If Diploma Type is other than ZZZ, then Certificate of Completion, Type must be ZZZ and vice versa. -record rejected- 24. Deleted 7/02. 25. Deleted 7/02. 26. Deleted 2018-19. 27. Adult General Education, Withdrawal Reason must be A, B, C, D, E, F, G, N, or Z. -record rejected- 28. If Diploma Type is not ZZZ, Adult General Education, Diploma Date must be a valid MMDDYYYY date that is not in the future and must be a date in the current reporting year. If Diploma Type equals ZZZ, Adult General Education, Diploma Date must be all zeroes. -record rejected- 29. (REVISED 2021 as of 05/2021) If Survey = F or S the and Diploma Type is W43, W45, W52, W54, W55, W58, W59, W60, W61, W62, or W63 then Grade Level must be one of the grades 30 or 31. Else if Survey is W not F and Diploma Type is W43, W45, W52, W54, W55, W58, W59, W61, W62, or W63 then Grade Level must be one of the grades 30 or 31. -record rejected- 30. If Certificate of Completion, Type is W44, W53, or W56, Grade Level must be 30. -record rejected- 70. (REVISED 2021) Each WDIS Student End of Term Status record must have a matching WDIS Student Demographic record based on District Number, Current Instruction/ Service; Student Number Identifier, Florida; Florida Education Identifier; Survey Period Code and WDIS Reporting Year. -state validation- 71. If Diploma Type = W06, then Exceptionality, Primary may not be C, G, H, J, K, O, S, V or W. -state validation- .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nuclear Technology
    Nuclear Technology Joseph A. Angelo, Jr. GREENWOOD PRESS NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY Sourcebooks in Modern Technology Space Technology Joseph A. Angelo, Jr. Sourcebooks in Modern Technology Nuclear Technology Joseph A. Angelo, Jr. GREENWOOD PRESS Westport, Connecticut • London Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Angelo, Joseph A. Nuclear technology / Joseph A. Angelo, Jr. p. cm.—(Sourcebooks in modern technology) Includes index. ISBN 1–57356–336–6 (alk. paper) 1. Nuclear engineering. I. Title. II. Series. TK9145.A55 2004 621.48—dc22 2004011238 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data is available. Copyright © 2004 by Joseph A. Angelo, Jr. All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced, by any process or technique, without the express written consent of the publisher. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 2004011238 ISBN: 1–57356–336–6 First published in 2004 Greenwood Press, 88 Post Road West, Westport, CT 06881 An imprint of Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. www.greenwood.com Printed in the United States of America The paper used in this book complies with the Permanent Paper Standard issued by the National Information Standards Organization (Z39.48–1984). 10987654321 To my wife, Joan—a wonderful companion and soul mate Contents Preface ix Chapter 1. History of Nuclear Technology and Science 1 Chapter 2. Chronology of Nuclear Technology 65 Chapter 3. Profiles of Nuclear Technology Pioneers, Visionaries, and Advocates 95 Chapter 4. How Nuclear Technology Works 155 Chapter 5. Impact 315 Chapter 6. Issues 375 Chapter 7. The Future of Nuclear Technology 443 Chapter 8. Glossary of Terms Used in Nuclear Technology 485 Chapter 9. Associations 539 Chapter 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Information
    ARTICLE Supplemental Information PEDIATRICS Volume 146, Number 3, September 2020 1 SUPPLEMANTAL FIGURE 3 Example individualized antibiotic prescribing feedback report used in the DART study. Amox, amoxicillin; Clav, clavulanate; Rx, prescription. 2 ARTICLE SUPPLEMANTAL FIGURE 4 aRR for antibiotic prescribing from ITT analyses of the DART primary and secondary outcomes by study phase. PEDIATRICS Volume 146, Number 3, September 2020 3 SUPPLEMANTAL TABLE 5 ICD-10 Codes Used To Define ARTI Visits Diagnosis Included Conditions ICD-10 Codesa AOM Acute serous, allergic, and H65.0n, H65.11n, H65.19n, H65.2n, nonsuppurative otitis media; chronic H65.3n, H65.41n, H65.49n, H65.9n, serous, mucoid, allergic, and H66.00n, H66.01n, H66.1n, H66.2n, nonsuppurative otitis media H66.3Xn, H66.4n, H66.9n, and/or H67.n Pharyngitis Acute pharyngitis and tonsillitis J02, J02.n, J03, J03.00, J03.8n, and/or J03.9n Sinusitis Acute maxillary, frontal, ethmoidal, J01.0n, J01.1n, J01.2n, J01.3n, J01.4n, sphenoidal, and pansinusitis J01.8n, and/or J01.9n Viral ARTIsb Common cold, upper respiratory tract J00, J06.n, J10.1, J11.1, J20.3-J20.9, infection, influenza, bronchitis, and J21.n, and/or J40 bronchiolitis Additional Central venous catheter infections, T80.2n, T88.0n, W50.3n, W53.n1Xn, bacterial infection after immunization, bites and W54.0XXn, W55.n1Xn, W56.n1Xn, infectionsc scratches, infections due to specific W58.n1Xn, W59.n1Xn, W61.n1xn, pathogens (eg, Salmonella), sexually Y04.1xxn, A01.0n, A01.n, A02.n, A03.n, transmitted diseases, neutropenia, A04.n, A18.0n,
    [Show full text]
  • Library of Congress Classification
    R MEDICINE (GENERAL) R Medicine (General) Periodicals. Societies. Serials 5 International periodicals and serials 10 Medical societies Including aims, scope, utility, etc. International societies 10.5.A3 General works 10.5.A5-Z Individual societies America English United States. Canada 11 Periodicals. Serials 15 Societies British West Indies. Belize. Guyana 18 Periodicals. Serials 20 Societies Spanish and Portuguese Latin America 21 Periodicals. Serials 25 Societies 27.A-Z Other, A-Z 27.F7 French Europe English 31 Periodicals. Serials 35 Societies Dutch 37 Periodicals. Serials 39 Societies French 41 Periodicals. Serials 45 Societies German 51 Periodicals. Serials 55 Societies Italian 61 Periodicals. Serials 65 Societies Spanish and Portuguese 71 Periodicals. Serials 75 Societies Scandinavian 81 Periodicals. Serials 85 Societies Slavic 91 Periodicals. Serials 95 Societies 96.A-Z Other European languages, A-Z 96.H8 Hungarian Asia 97 English 97.5.A-Z Other European languages, A-Z 97.7.A-Z Other languages, A-Z Africa 98 English 98.5.A-Z Other European languages, A-Z 98.7.A-Z Other languages, A-Z 1 R MEDICINE (GENERAL) R Periodicals. Societies. Serials -- Continued Australasia and Pacific islands 99 English 99.5.A-Z Other European languages, A-Z 99.7.A-Z Other languages, A-Z Indexes see Z6658+ (101) Yearbooks see R5+ 104 Calendars. Almanacs Cf. AY81.M4 American popular medical almanacs 106 Congresses 108 Medical laboratories, institutes, etc. Class here papers and proceedings For works about these organizations see R860+ Collected works (nonserial) Cf. R126+ Ancient Greek and Latin works 111 Several authors 114 Individual authors Communication in medicine Cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Thierry Moreau
    Compilation and Hardware Support for Approximate Acceleration Thierry Moreau, Adrian Sampson, Andre Baixo, Mark Wyse, Ben Ransford, Jacob Nelson, Hadi Esmaeilzadeh (Georgia Tech), Luis Ceze and Mark Oskin University of Washington [email protected] Theme: 2384.004 1 Thierry Moreau Approximate Computing Aims to exploit application resilience to trade-off quality for efficiency 2 Thierry Moreau Approximate Computing 3 Thierry Moreau Approximate Computing ✅ Accurate ✅ Approximate ❌ Expensive ✅ Cheap 4 Thierry Moreau 5 Thierry Moreau 6 Thierry Moreau 7 Thierry Moreau Neural Networks as Approximate Accelerators CPU Esmaeilzadeh et al. [MICRO 2012] 8 Thierry Moreau Neural Acceleration float foo (float a, float b) { AR F … NPUM P G return val; approximation acceleration } 9 Thierry Moreau Neural Acceleration compiler-support float foo (float a, float b) { AR F … NPUM P G return val; approximation acceleration } ACCEPT* *Sampson et. al [UW-TR] 10 Thierry Moreau Neural Acceleration compiler-support HW-support float foo (float a, float b) { AR F … NPUM P G return val; approximation acceleration } ACCEPT SNNAP* *Moreau et. al [HPCA2015] 11 Thierry Moreau Neural Acceleration compiler-support HW-support float foo (float a, float b) { AR F … NPUM P G return val; approximation acceleration } ACCEPT SNNAP 3.8x speedup and 2.8x efficiency - 10% error 12 Thierry Moreau Talk Outline Introduction Compiler Support with ACCEPT SNNAP Accelerator design Evaluation & Comparison with HLS 13 Thierry Moreau Compilation Overview code 1. Region detection annotation 14 Thierry Moreau Compilation Overview ACCEPT code region detection 1. Region detection & program annotation instrumentation 15 Thierry Moreau Compilation Overview ACCEPT code region detection 1. Region detection & program annotation instrumentation back prop.
    [Show full text]
  • Heater Element Specifications Bulletin Number 592
    Technical Data Heater Element Specifications Bulletin Number 592 Topic Page Description 2 Heater Element Selection Procedure 2 Index to Heater Element Selection Tables 5 Heater Element Selection Tables 6 Additional Resources These documents contain additional information concerning related products from Rockwell Automation. Resource Description Industrial Automation Wiring and Grounding Guidelines, publication 1770-4.1 Provides general guidelines for installing a Rockwell Automation industrial system. Product Certifications website, http://www.ab.com Provides declarations of conformity, certificates, and other certification details. You can view or download publications at http://www.rockwellautomation.com/literature/. To order paper copies of technical documentation, contact your local Allen-Bradley distributor or Rockwell Automation sales representative. For Application on Bulletin 100/500/609/1200 Line Starters Heater Element Specifications Eutectic Alloy Overload Relay Heater Elements Type J — CLASS 10 Type P — CLASS 20 (Bul. 600 ONLY) Type W — CLASS 20 Type WL — CLASS 30 Note: Heater Element Type W/WL does not currently meet the material Type W Heater Elements restrictions related to EU ROHS Description The following is for motors rated for Continuous Duty: For motors with marked service factor of not less than 1.15, or Overload Relay Class Designation motors with a marked temperature rise not over +40 °C United States Industry Standards (NEMA ICS 2 Part 4) designate an (+104 °F), apply application rules 1 through 3. Apply application overload relay by a class number indicating the maximum time in rules 2 and 3 when the temperature difference does not exceed seconds at which it will trip when carrying a current equal to 600 +10 °C (+18 °F).
    [Show full text]
  • K-12 Individual No. Name Team Gr Rate Pts Tbrk1 Tbrk2 Tbrk3 Tbrk4
    K-12 Individual No. Name Team Gr Rate Pts TBrk1 TBrk2 TBrk3 TBrk4 Rnd1 Rnd2 Rnd3 Rnd4 Rnd5 Rnd6 1 Chakraborty, Dipro 11 2299 5.5 21 24 43 20.5 W27 W12 W5 W32 W8 D3 State Champion, AZ Denker Representative 2 Yim, Tony Sung BASISS 8 2135 5 20.5 23.5 38.5 17.5 W24 W10 D3 D16 W11 W9 3 Aletheia-Zomlefer, Soren CHANPR 11 1961 5 20 23 35.5 18.5 W25 W26 D2 W40 W15 D1 4 Desmarais, Nicholas Eduard NOTRED 10 1917 5 18 20 33 18 W39 W23 W18 L15 W10 W8 5 Wong, Kinsleigh Phillip CFHS 10 1992 4.5 20 20 24.5 15 -X- W17 L1 W26 D7 W15 6 Todd, Bryce BASISC 10 1923 4.5 17 19 26.5 14.5 W38 D18 L9 W23 W21 W16 7 Chaliki, Kalyan DSMTHS 9 1726 4.5 17 18.5 26 15 W46 L16 W28 W22 D5 W17 8 Li, Bohan UHS 9 2048 4 22 25 29 18 W30 W11 W45 W9 L1 L4 9 Mittal, Rohan CFHS 9 1916 4 19.5 20.5 23 17 W47 W22 W6 L8 W20 L2 10 Pennock, Joshua CFHS 10 1682 4 19 22 24 14 W31 L2 W25 W21 L4 W29 11 Aradhyula, Sumhith CFHS 9 1631 4 18 20 22 14 W41 L8 W38 W13 L2 W19 12 Johnston, Nicolas Godfrey CFHS 9 1803 4 18 19.5 21 13 W43 L1 W29 L17 W24 W20 13 Martis, Tyler BRHS 12 1787 4 17 18 21 13 W42 L15 W24 L11 W18 W22 14 Plumb, Justin Rodney GCLACA 10 1700 4 16 17 20 13 W51 L32 W19 L20 W28 W27 15 Martinez, Isaac GLPREP 10 2159 3.5 21.5 24.5 27.5 16 W28 W13 D16 W4 L3 L5 16 Chen, Derek H CFHS 10 1965 3.5 21 23.5 26 15.5 W35 W7 D15 D2 D17 L6 17 Woodson, Tyler GILBHS 1640 3.5 19 19 17.5 14 W50 L5 W30 W12 D16 L7 18 Cancio, Aiya CFHS 9 1469 3.5 18.5 20 17.5 12.5 W36 D6 L4 W46 L13 W25 AZ Girls' Invitational Representative 19 Folden, Kurt CHANPR 10 1207 3 14 18 12 10 L32 W50 L14 W31 W23 L11 20 Thornton,
    [Show full text]
  • Fock–Goncharov Coordinates for Semisimple Lie Groups
    FOCK–GONCHAROV COORDINATES FOR SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS S. GILLES Abstract. Fock and Goncharov [FG06b] introduced cluster ensembles, providing a framework for coordi- nates on varieties of surface representations into Lie groups, as well as a complete construction for groups of type An. Later, Zickert [Zic19], Le [Le16b], [Le16a], and Ip [Ip18] described, using differing methods, how to apply this framework for other Lie group types. Zickert also showed that this framework applies to triangulated 3-manifolds. We present a complete, general construction, based on work of Fomin and Zelevinsky. In particular, we complete the picture for the remaining cases: Lie groups of types F4, E6, E7, and E8. Contents Acknowledgements 2 1. Introduction 2 1.1. Classical Teichmüller space 2 1.2. Cluster ensemble structures 4 1.3. Higher Teichmüller spaces 5 1.4. Results 7 1.5. Historical context 7 2. Ingredients 8 2.1. Root spaces and Weyl groups 8 2.2. Unipotent subgroups 9 2.3. Coxeter elements 9 2.4. Generalized minors 9 2.5. Factorization coordinates 11 2.6. Quivers 11 2.7. Cluster ensembles 12 3. Key identities 13 3.1. Actions of a dubs 13 3.2. Actions of σG 13 3.3. Grid exchange relations 14 4. Coordinates on generically-decorated representations 15 4.1. Configurations and gluings 16 arXiv:2104.04941v1 [math.GT] 11 Apr 2021 4.2. Triangular quivers and Fock–Goncharov coordinate structures 17 4.3. From coordinates to representations 21 4.4. Regarding 3-manifolds 23 5. Main Result: Fock–Goncharov coordinate structures for non-An 23 5.1.
    [Show full text]
  • April 4, 2003, Board Letter Establishing a 60-Day Reporting
    John T. Conway, Chairman A.J. Eggenbe,ger, Vice Chairman DEFENSE NUCLFAR FACILITIES John E. Mansfield SAFE'IY BOARD 625 Indiana Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, D.C. 20004-2901 (202) 694-7000 April 4, 2003 The Honorable Linton Brooks Acting Administrator of the National Nuclear Security Administration U.S. Department ofEnergy 1000 Independence A venue, SW Washington, DC 20585-0701 Dear Ambassador Brooks: During the past 16 months, the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) has held a number of reviews at the Pantex Plant to evaluate conduct ofoperations and the site's training programs. The Board is pleased to see that procedural adherence and conduct ofoperations for operational personnel are improving and that a program to improve operating procedures is ongoing. However, a review by the Board's staff has revealed problems at Pantex with the processes used to develop training, to evaluate personnel knowledge, to assess training program elements, and to conduct continuing training. These training deficiencies, detailed in the enclosed report, may affect the ability to improve and maintain satisfactory conduct of operations at the Pantex Plant. Therefore, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2286b(d), the Board requests a report within the next 60 days regarding the measures that are being taken to address these training deficiencies. Sincerely, c: The Honorable Everet H. Beckner Mr. Daniel E. Glenn Mr. Mark B. Whitaker, Jr. Enclosure DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD Staff Issue Report March 24, 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR: J. K. Fortenberry, Technical Director COPIES: Board Members FROM: J. Deplitch SUBJECT: Conduct ofOperations and Training Programs at the Pantex Plant This report documents a review by the staff ofthe Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) ofconduct ofoperations and the training programs at the Pantex Plant.
    [Show full text]
  • Influencer Poll: Likelihood to Recommend & Support
    Wave 56 Influencer Poll Update January 2018 Public Release Influencer Poll: Likelihood to Recommend & Support 1 Likelihood to Recommend and Support Military Service Likelihood to Recommend and Support Military Service 80% 71% 70% 71% 70% 66% 66% 66% 67% 63% 63% 63% 64% 61% 63% 60% 50% 46% 47% 47% 45% 44% 42% 43% 42% 39% 38% 40% 35% 32% 33% 34% 34% 30% 20% 10% Likely to Recommend: % Likely/Very Likely Likely to Support: % Agree/Strongly Agree Yearly Quarterly 0% Jan–Mar 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Likely to Recommend Military Service Likely to Support Decision to Join § Influencers’ likelihood to support the decision to join the Military increased significantly from 67% in 2015 to 70% in 2016. § However, Influencers’ likelihood to support the decision to join the Military remained stable in January–March 2017. = Significantly change from previous poll Source: Military Ad Tracking Study (Influencer Market) Wave 56 2 Questions: q1a–c: “Suppose [relation] came to you for advice about various post-high school options. How likely is it that you would recommend joining a Military Service such as the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, or Coast Guard?” q2ff: “If [relation] told me they were planning to join the Military, I would support their decision.” Likelihood to Recommend Military Service By Influencer Type Likelihood to Recommend Military Service 80% 70% 63% 59% 59% 60% 58% 60% 57% 56% 57% 55% 54% 53% 48% 55% 50% 54% 47% 52% 51% 44% 51% 47% 42% 42% 42% 49% 41% 43% 42% 45% 45% 46% 40% 42% 37% 41% 39% 41% 38% 38% 38% 37% 37% 39% 34% 35% 34% 30% 33% 33% 32% 33% 32% 31% 32% 31% 31% 31% 32% 20% 25% 25% 24% 31% 29% 10% % Likely/Very Likely Yearly Quarterly 0% Jan–Mar 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Fathers Mothers Grandparents Other Influencers § Influencers’ likelihood to recommend military service remained stable in January–March 2017 for all influencer groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Bob Farquhar
    1 2 Created by Bob Farquhar For and dedicated to my grandchildren, their children, and all humanity. This is Copyright material 3 Table of Contents Preface 4 Conclusions 6 Gadget 8 Making Bombs Tick 15 ‘Little Boy’ 25 ‘Fat Man’ 40 Effectiveness 49 Death By Radiation 52 Crossroads 55 Atomic Bomb Targets 66 Acheson–Lilienthal Report & Baruch Plan 68 The Tests 71 Guinea Pigs 92 Atomic Animals 96 Downwinders 100 The H-Bomb 109 Nukes in Space 119 Going Underground 124 Leaks and Vents 132 Turning Swords Into Plowshares 135 Nuclear Detonations by Other Countries 147 Cessation of Testing 159 Building Bombs 161 Delivering Bombs 178 Strategic Bombers 181 Nuclear Capable Tactical Aircraft 188 Missiles and MIRV’s 193 Naval Delivery 211 Stand-Off & Cruise Missiles 219 U.S. Nuclear Arsenal 229 Enduring Stockpile 246 Nuclear Treaties 251 Duck and Cover 255 Let’s Nuke Des Moines! 265 Conclusion 270 Lest We Forget 274 The Beginning or The End? 280 Update: 7/1/12 Copyright © 2012 rbf 4 Preface 5 Hey there, I’m Ralph. That’s my dog Spot over there. Welcome to the not-so-wonderful world of nuclear weaponry. This book is a journey from 1945 when the first atomic bomb was detonated in the New Mexico desert to where we are today. It’s an interesting and sometimes bizarre journey. It can also be horribly frightening. Today, there are enough nuclear weapons to destroy the civilized world several times over. Over 23,000. “Enough to make the rubble bounce,” Winston Churchill said. The United States alone has over 10,000 warheads in what’s called the ‘enduring stockpile.’ In my time, we took care of things Mano-a-Mano.
    [Show full text]
  • Price List Eur up by Lendager Group Price List Eur up Page 1 / 6
    PRICE LIST EUR UP BY LENDAGER GROUP PRICE LIST EUR UP PAGE 1 / 6 INDEX 3 UP KITCHEN All prices are incl. VAT and without delivery. Dimensions are in cm. PRICE LIST EUR UP KITCHEN PAGE 2 / 6 Kitchen pricing This is your guide to pricing on the UP kitchen by Lendager Group. The design is compatible with our own cabinets and IKEA’s METOD kitchen. For more information, visit the dedicated UP page on reformcph.com All prices are incl. VAT and without delivery. Dimensions are in cm. PRICE LIST EUR UP KITCHEN PAGE 3 / 6 Door Measurement Solid wood Veneer W20 x H80 - 244 EUR W26 x H80 (2 pcs.) - 528 EUR W30 x H40 192 EUR - W30 x H60 - 252 EUR W30 x H80 - 282 EUR W40 x H40 228 EUR - W40 x H60 - 282 EUR W40 x H80 - 322 EUR W40 x H100 - 360 EUR W40 x H120 - 400 EUR W40 x H140 - 438 EUR W40 x H160 - 478 EUR W40 x H180 - 518 EUR W40 x H200 - 556 EUR W60 x H40 300 EUR - W60 x H60 - 340 EUR W60 x H80 - 400 EUR W60 x H100 - 460 EUR W60 x H120 - 518 EUR W60 x H140 - 578 EUR W60 x H160 - 636 EUR W60 x H180 - 696 EUR W60 x H200 - 754 EUR Drawer front Measurement Solid wood Veneer W40 x H10 156 EUR - W40 x H20 156 EUR - W40 x H40 228 EUR - W40 x H60 - 282 EUR W60 x H10 192 EUR - W60 x H15 192 EUR - W60 x H20 192 EUR - W60 x H40 300 EUR - W60 x H60 - 340 EUR W80 x H10 228 EUR - W80 x H20 228 EUR - W80 x H40 370 EUR - W80 x H60 - 400 EUR All prices are incl.
    [Show full text]
  • Sgs01fenstermacher.Pdf
    - ! ,:. Sciena & Global Security, 1990, Volume I, ppo187-223 Pbotooopying permitt£d by license only Reprints available directly from the publisher C>1990 Gordon and Breach Science Publishers SoA. Printed in the United States of America The Effects of Nuclear Test-ban Regimes on Th ird -generation-wea pon I n novation Dan L. Fenstermache~ The primary reason that we are pursuing nuclear directed energy weapons is to understand the Soviets' capability to design and deploy similar weapons,which would put the US strategic deterrent force or a future defensivesystem at risk. Former US Energy Secretary John S. Herrington' It is by no means certain that a Comprehensive Test Ban would prevent the Soviets from developing a new generation of nuclear weapons, although that would assuredly be the effect of a total testing ban on the US. Former Director of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Donald Kerrt Under the rationale of assessing potential Soviet threats, several third-generation- weapon concepts are being actively studied in the US. This paper presents a technical analysis of the physical principles and likely capabilities of three nuclear directed-energy concepts (x-my lasers, nuclear kinetic-energy weapons, and micro- wave devices) and describes the implications for their development of threshold test bans at thresholds above and below 1 kiloton, Inertial Confinement Fusion, special- ized non-nuclear weapon effects simulation, and seismically quiet containment a. Center for Energy and Environmental Studies. Princeton University. Princeton. NJ 08544 Some of ftJ/s research was undertaken while on feUol,I,Shlpat ftJe Center for Science and International Affairs. Kennedy School of Government.
    [Show full text]