DOCSLIB.ORG

Influencer Poll: Likelihood to Recommend & Support

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Influencer Poll: Likelihood to Recommend & Support Wave 56 Influencer Poll Update January 2018 Public Release Influencer Poll: Likelihood to Recommend & Support 1 Likelihood to Recommend and Support Military Service Likelihood to Recommend and Support Military Service 80% 71% 70% 71% 70% 66% 66% 66% 67% 63% 63% 63% 64% 61% 63% 60% 50% 46% 47% 47% 45% 44% 42% 43% 42% 39% 38% 40% 35% 32% 33% 34% 34% 30% 20% 10% Likely to Recommend: % Likely/Very Likely Likely to Support: % Agree/Strongly Agree Yearly Quarterly 0% Jan–Mar 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Likely to Recommend Military Service Likely to Support Decision to Join § Influencers’ likelihood to support the decision to join the Military increased significantly from 67% in 2015 to 70% in 2016. § However, Influencers’ likelihood to support the decision to join the Military remained stable in January–March 2017. = Significantly change from previous poll Source: Military Ad Tracking Study (Influencer Market) Wave 56 2 Questions: q1a–c: “Suppose [relation] came to you for advice about various post-high school options. How likely is it that you would recommend joining a Military Service such as the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, or Coast Guard?” q2ff: “If [relation] told me they were planning to join the Military, I would support their decision.” Likelihood to Recommend Military Service By Influencer Type Likelihood to Recommend Military Service 80% 70% 63% 59% 59% 60% 58% 60% 57% 56% 57% 55% 54% 53% 48% 55% 50% 54% 47% 52% 51% 44% 51% 47% 42% 42% 42% 49% 41% 43% 42% 45% 45% 46% 40% 42% 37% 41% 39% 41% 38% 38% 38% 37% 37% 39% 34% 35% 34% 30% 33% 33% 32% 33% 32% 31% 32% 31% 31% 31% 32% 20% 25% 25% 24% 31% 29% 10% % Likely/Very Likely Yearly Quarterly 0% Jan–Mar 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Fathers Mothers Grandparents Other Influencers § Influencers’ likelihood to recommend military service remained stable in January–March 2017 for all influencer groups. = Significantly change from previous poll Source: Military Ad Tracking Study (Influencer Market) Wave 56 3 Questions: q1a–c: “Suppose [relation] came to you for advice about various post-high school options. How likely is it that you would recommend joining a Military Service such as the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, or Coast Guard?” Likelihood to Recommend Active Duty Service By Service Likelihood to Recommend Active Duty Service 80% 70% 60% 50% 46% 46% 46% 43% 41% 39% 39% 41% 39% 40% 38% 37% 34% 31% 31% 35% 32% 33% 34% 39% 39% 37% 31% 28% 27% 31% 35% 28% 29% 32% 33% 30% 27% 27% 33% 31% 29% 32% 34% 32% 27% 26% 26% 29% 32% 31% 20% 26% 25% 27% 31% 23% 22% 24% 26% 29% 22% 21% 21% 25% 19% 18% 18% 19% 21% 10% 17% 19% 16% Yearly Quarterly % Likely/Very Likely 0% Jan–Mar 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Army Navy Marine Corps Air Force Coast Guard § Influencers’ likelihood to recommend serving in an active duty Service remained stable in January–March 2017. Influencers were more likely to recommend the Air Force and Navy than they were to recommend the Army and Marine Corps. = Significantly change from previous poll Source: Military Ad Tracking Study (Influencer Market) Wave 56 4 Question: q2: “How likely is it that you would recommend serving to your [relation] [on active duty in the Army, on active duty in the Navy, on active duty in the Air Force, on active duty in the Marine Corps, on active duty in the Coast Guard]?” Likelihood to Support Military Service By Influencer Type Likelihood to Support Military Service 80% 77% 76% 78% 74% 72% 71% 74% 69% 68% 72% 75% 69% 71% 68% 69% 70% 72% 74% 70% 67% 65% 66% 67% 72% 66% 71% 64% 69% 71% 70% 66% 61% 66% 64% 60% 65% 65% 66% 65% 65% 63% 63% 61% 63% 60% 60% 59% 60% 56% 55% 56% 50% 56% 54% 55% 40% 30% 20% 10% % Agree/Strongly Agree Yearly Quarterly 0% Jan–Mar 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Fathers Mothers Grandparents Other Influencers § Influencers’ likelihood to support military service remained stable in January–March 2017 for all influencer groups. = Significantly change from previous poll Source: Military Ad Tracking Study (Influencer Market) Wave 56 5 Question: q2ff: “If [relation] told me they were planning to join the Military, I would support their decision.” Likelihood to Support Active Duty Service By Service Likelihood to Support Active Duty Service 80% 70% 60% 61% 60% 53% 54% 50% 57% 55% 56% 54% 49% 49% 50% 55% 47% 47% 52% 51% 52% 50% 46% 54% 53% 46% 44% 51% 50% 48% 50% 50% 47% 40% 45% 44% 47% 42% 42% 43% 44% 43% 47% 42% 42% 42% 45% 42% 36% 38% 43% 41% 41% 30% 35% 36% 40% 32% 34% 36% 32% 20% 10% Yearly Quarterly % Likely/Very Likely 0% Jan–Mar 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Army Navy Marine Corps Air Force Coast Guard § Influencers’ support for joining the Air Force and the Marine Corps reached tracking highs in January–March 2017, although this was not a significant increase from 2016. § Influencers were more likely to support the Air Force, Coast Guard, and Navy than they were to support the Army and Marine Corps. = Significantly change from previous poll Source: Military Ad Tracking Study (Influencer Market) Wave 56 6 Question: q2gg: “If [relation] told you they were planning to join, how likely is it that you would support their decision to serve [on active duty in the Army, on active duty in the Navy, on active duty in the Air Force, on active duty in the Marine Corps, on active duty in the Coast Guard]?” Backup 7 Influencer Poll Methodology and Sample The Military Ad Tracking Study provides metrics on awareness of and attitudes toward the Military Services’ advertising campaigns. The Influencer Update focuses on advertising and recruiting strategies that allow the Services to connect with adults and prevent them from creating obstacles for youth interested in military service. Timeline: January–March 2017. Interview Method: Probability-based online panel (nationally representative). Target Audience: Influencers of youth ages 12–21. In Wave 56: 255 Fathers, 228 Mothers, 207 Grandparents, 198 Other Influencers (e.g., teachers, coaches, guidance counselors, relatives, mentors). Weighting: The data are weighted to represent the U.S. population in terms of gender, age, race, ethnicity, education, census region, and metropolitan area. Reporting: 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Jan–Mar W4 W8 W12 W16 W20 W24 W28 W32 W36 W40 W44 W48 W52 W56 Reporting in this deck Apr–Jun W1 W5 W9 W13 W17 W21 W25 W29 W33 W37 W41 W45 W49 W53 Jul–Sep W2 W6 W10 W14 W18 W22 W26 W30 W34 W38 W42 W46 W50 W54 Oct–Dec W3 W7 W11 W15 W19 W23 W27 W31 W35 W39 W43 W47 W51 W55 Source: Military Ad Tracking Study (Influencer Market) Wave 56 8.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Worksop-Inset.Pdf
    Worksop inset map 258 151 43.3m 3 41.8m 139 74 135 ANSTON AVENUE 64 4 SOUTH VIEW 125 AVENUE HARSTOFT 54 3 LB 214 115 42 PCs 31 22 105 40 Shelter 42.4m 13 Supermarket 36 32 El Sub Sta 22 44.5m 1 12 221 81 246 69 2 103 48.2m 37 57 A N S TO N A V E N U E 54 ED & Ward Bdy 52a B L Y TH G R O V E 45 41 Key 33 45.7m 29 23 CR 2 13 STANLEY STREET STANLEY 35 25 3 234 1a3a 1 11 North Nottinghamshire College Shelter 21 5 21 217 (FE) 12 New Housing (ST18) 33 52 12 43 BLYTH ROAD 53 19 222 JA M E S S TR E E T 215 1 G A TE FO R D R O A D 2 Works CR 220 8 Proposed mixed use (Policy 17) 10 54.3m 14 I Ward Bdy 25 13 SP 6 GP 1a 17 1b 208 Shelter 2 1 Committed Housing 36 3 HOLMEFIELD CLOSE HOLMEFIELD 15 43.0m S H E P H E R D 'S A V E N U E 15 2 13 CR Norbridge Academy 29 196 (Sch) 15 PERCIVAL STREET PERCIVAL 38 New Employment (ST08) 2a 24 2 203 L Twrs W52 13 8 1 3 52.4m 10 186 11 S H E P H E R D 'S A V E N U E 34 Pit 18 Wr Pt 9 Exisiting Employment (ST11) SPs 30 12 174 SP 34a M e rry -g o -ro u n d CR 168 28 Locally important openL Twr space (ST48) W ag o n D ep o t The Chestnuts 50.0m 3 El Sub Sta SP Oak Lodge Playingfield and outdoor sportsSandhole Sidings facility (ST49) TU R N E R R O A D 40.0m 20 1 LB El Sub Sta 185 78 Ward Bdy STREET 18 1b 8 CR 1a 102 183 7 Main Green Corridor (ST41) STANLEY 90 72 MP 0.5 50.6m ED Bdy BANK El Sub Sta BLYTH ROAD Turner Road 18a SUNNY ED Bdy TU R N E R R O A D 64 SP Industrial 51.8m Minor Green Corridor (ST41) Estate 18b 54 Club 47.2m 50 Ward Bdy 48.8m 63 61 53 6 50.9m ED Bdy ED & Ward Bdy Ward & ED 49 SUNNY BANK Bowling
    [Show full text]
  • Web Appendix
    Online Appendix for “Productivity Shocks, Long-Term Contracts and Earnings Dynamics” Neele Balke∗, Thibaut Lamadon† September 25, 2020 W1 Model web appendix........................ W1 W1.1 Properties of equilibrium functions............ W1 W1.2 Existence of equilibrium................. W9 W2 Identification web appendix.................... W23 W2.1 Data............................ W24 W2.2 Identifying the choice probabilities............ W24 W2.3 Identifying the model parameters............ W26 W2.4 Proofs........................... W27 W3 Data web appendix......................... W43 W3.1 Institutional background................. W43 W3.2 Moments description................... W45 W4 Estimation web appendix..................... W46 W4.1 Numerical solution to the model............. W47 W4.2 Simulating moments.................... W48 W4.3 Optimization........................ W48 W4.4 Computing standard errors................ W49 ∗Kenneth C. Griffin Dept. of Economics, University of Chicago, [email protected]. †Kenneth C. Griffin Dept. of Economics, University of Chicago, [email protected], IFAU, IFS and NBER. W1 Model web appendix W1.1 Properties of equilibrium functions In this section, we define the set J of profit functions of the firm and then, taking an arbitrary J ∈ J as given, derive properties of the market tightness, job finding probability, and search and effort policy functions in equilibrium. Definition W1 (Definition of J). Let J be defined as the set of firms’ value functions J : S × V → R such that (J1) For all (x, z) ∈ S and all V1,V2 ∈ V with V1 ≤ V2, the difference J(x, z, V2)− J(x, z, V1) is bounded by −BJ (V2 − V1) and −BJ (V2 − V1) where BJ ≥ BJ > 0 are some constants. (J2) For all (x, z, V ) ∈ S × V, J(x, z, V ) is bounded in [J, J] where J = f(x,z)−u−1 v+c(e)−βv f(x,z)−u−1 v+c(e)−βv 1−β and J = 1−β .
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery World 02/03/2018 TD: Bob Patterson-Sumwalt Participants 155 K12 Participants in Tournaments to Date 17 - 18 1774
    Discovery World 02/03/2018 TD: Bob Patterson-Sumwalt Participants 155 K12 Participants in tournaments to date 17 - 18 1774 No. Name Pts Local Team TBrk1 TBrk2 TBrk3 Rnd1 Rnd2 Rnd3 Rnd4 Rnd5 1 KRAEMER, JOHNATHAN 5.0 1222 PIUSwa 12.0 14.0 15.0 W29 W14 W37 W16 W10 2 CHEN, ALEXANDER 4.5 1354 MEQUON15.5 18.0 14.5 W20 W4 W26 W5 D3 3 NEEB, WILL JR 4.5 1323 GOLDmi 12.5 14.5 14.5 W35 W15 W32 W13 D2 4 NEEB, EMMA 4.0 1153 GOLDmi 14.5 16.5 11.0 W6 L2 W39 W23 W19 5 SURESH, ARJUN 4.0 1155 NORTwa 14.0 16.5 13.0 W11 W25 W23 L2 W14 6 RUPLINGER, AARON 4.0 1222 FRANwe 13.0 14.5 10.0 L4 W18 W45 W22 W17 7 HARWOOD, WILLIAM 4.0 1173 MEQUON12.0 14.5 11.0 W17 L13 W25 W21 W15 8 SCHMIDT, NATHAN 4.0 1123 RIVEmi 12.0 14.5 10.0 L15 W21 W28 W18 W13 9 SHANMUGASUNDARAM, TANYA4.0 1014 NORTme 10.5 12.5 10.0 L13 W27 W38 W32 W16 10 MOLINA, MAXIMUS 3.5 968 UNITmi 14.5 16.0 12.0 W22 D11 W44 W19 L1 11 HANSEN, KEEGAN 3.5 940 GOLDmi 11.5 13.0 8.0 L5 D10 W40 W44 W35 12 PAGEL, CARSON 3.5 921 GOLDmi 10.5 12.0 8.0 L14 D44 W31 W26 W30 13 ORTIZ, DIEGO 3.0 1121 UNITmi 16.5 19.5 12.0 W9 W7 W24 L3 L8 14 MARTINEZ, GUSTAVO 3.0 973 UNITmi 15.5 16.5 10.0 W12 L1 W51 W24 L5 15 ALEXANDER, DELIA 3.0 1008 CARMEN 14.5 15.5 10.0 W8 L3 W50 W33 L7 16 VARELA, JAIRO 3.0 850 UNITmi 14.0 15.0 12.0 W53 W20 W43 L1 L9 17 MORALES, RAFAEL 3.0 948 UNITmi 13.0 15.0 9.0 L7 W28 W27 W43 L6 18 SCHESKE, WILLIAM 3.0 855 GOLDmi 12.0 12.5 9.0 W34 L6 W52 L8 W33 19 SCHOMANN, MADDOX 3.0 800 TEMPsu 11.5 13.5 12.0 W39 W34 W33 L10 L4 20 HARPER, TYRONE 3.0 906 GOLDmi 11.5 13.5 6.0 L2 L16 W41 W34 W32 21 CHAPLIN, CARTER 3.0
    [Show full text]
  • Heater Element Specifications Bulletin Number 592
    Technical Data Heater Element Specifications Bulletin Number 592 Topic Page Description 2 Heater Element Selection Procedure 2 Index to Heater Element Selection Tables 5 Heater Element Selection Tables 6 Additional Resources These documents contain additional information concerning related products from Rockwell Automation. Resource Description Industrial Automation Wiring and Grounding Guidelines, publication 1770-4.1 Provides general guidelines for installing a Rockwell Automation industrial system. Product Certifications website, http://www.ab.com Provides declarations of conformity, certificates, and other certification details. You can view or download publications at http://www.rockwellautomation.com/literature/. To order paper copies of technical documentation, contact your local Allen-Bradley distributor or Rockwell Automation sales representative. For Application on Bulletin 100/500/609/1200 Line Starters Heater Element Specifications Eutectic Alloy Overload Relay Heater Elements Type J — CLASS 10 Type P — CLASS 20 (Bul. 600 ONLY) Type W — CLASS 20 Type WL — CLASS 30 Note: Heater Element Type W/WL does not currently meet the material Type W Heater Elements restrictions related to EU ROHS Description The following is for motors rated for Continuous Duty: For motors with marked service factor of not less than 1.15, or Overload Relay Class Designation motors with a marked temperature rise not over +40 °C United States Industry Standards (NEMA ICS 2 Part 4) designate an (+104 °F), apply application rules 1 through 3. Apply application overload relay by a class number indicating the maximum time in rules 2 and 3 when the temperature difference does not exceed seconds at which it will trip when carrying a current equal to 600 +10 °C (+18 °F).
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPE RECEPTION T: +1 905-338-0000/ +1 888-901-3090 E: [email protected] CANADIAN DEALERSHIP PRICE 2020 Gvainteriors.Com PRICES ARE in CANADIAN DOLLARS
    GVA Interiors, Inc. PRICELIST 2771 Bristol Circle, Oakville, Ontario L6H 6X5 Canada EUROPE RECEPTION T: +1 905-338-0000/ +1 888-901-3090 E: [email protected] CANADIAN DEALERSHIP PRICE 2020 gvainteriors.com PRICES ARE IN CANADIAN DOLLARS CONFIDENTIAL E: [email protected] gvainteriors.com EUROPE RECEPTION *** RECEPTION HEIGHT 1162 MM / 45.7" *** LASEREDGE BANDING TECHNOLOGY *** STRAIGHT LINE INTERMEDIATE RECEPTION DIMENSIONS, INCHES DIMENSIONS, MM PART NUMBER PROJECT PRICE TOP COVER WITHOUT CUT W47.2"D29.6"H45.7" W1200 D752 H1162 193900 $ 1,151.13 a TOP CUTOUT COVER W47.2"D29.6"H45.7" W1200 D752 H1162 193904 $ 1,170.84 a ANGULAR INTERMEDIATE RECEPTION DIMENSIONS, INCHES DIMENSIONS, MM PART NUMBER PROJECT PRICE W47.2"D29.6"H45.7" W1200 D752 H1162 193970 $ 1,025.91 W55.1" D29.6" H45.7" W1400 D752 H1162 193972 $ 1,214.63 a TOP COVER WITHOUT CUT W47.2"D29.6"H45.7" W1200 D752 H1162 193971 $ 1,025.94 W55.1" D29.6" H45.7" W1400 D752 H1162 193973 $ 1,214.63 a DIMENSIONS, INCHES DIMENSIONS, MM PART NUMBER PROJECT PRICE W47.2" D29.6" H45.7" W1200 D752 H1162 193974 $ 1,041.79 W55.1" D29.6" H45.7" W1400 D752 H1162 193976 $ 1,232.69 a TOP CUTOUT COVER W47.2" D29.6" H45.7" W1200 D752 H1162 193975 $ 1,041.79 W55.1" D29.6" H45.7" W1400 D752 H1162 193977 $ 1,232.69 a STRAIGHT LINE END PART RECEPTION DIMENSIONS, INCHES DIMENSIONS, MM PART NUMBER PROJECT PRICE W63" D29.6" H45.7" W1600 D752 H1162 193910 $ 1,457.05 W71" D29.6" H45.7" W1800 D752 H1162 193912 $ 1,614.87 a TOP COVER WITHOUT CUT W63" D29.6" H45.7" W1600 D752 H1162 193911 $ 1,457.05 W71" D29.6" H45.7" W1800 D752 H1162 193913 $ 1,614.87 a DIMENSIONS, INCHES DIMENSIONS, MM PART NUMBER PROJECT PRICE W63" D29.6" H45.7" W1600 D752 H1162 193914 $ 1,477.80 a W71" D29.6" H45.7" W1800 D752 H1162 193916 $ 1,638.04 TOP CUTOUT COVER W63" D29.6" H45.7" W1600 D752 H1162 193915 $ 1,477.80 W71" D29.6" H45.7" W1800 D752 H1162 193917 $ 1,638.04 a GVA Interiors, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Specifications and Models
    MY 2021 Dealer Ordering Guide Spec 107. Daimler Sprinter Crew Van 3500 144" WB - Standard Roof (M3CV46) Please deduct 18% off MSRP Options for Sprinter Crew and Passenger Vans. Version 2 MY21 4 Cyl Gas/Diesel Dealer Ordering Guide MY 2021 DOG | ©2020 Daimler Vans USA LLC/Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC | mbvans.com MY 2021 Dealer Ordering Guide MY21 - Model Overview MY21 Changes Engines OM651 Models full availability BA3 Active brake assist MS1 Cruise Control Now Standard C6L Multifunction steering wheel F68 Heated and electrically adjustable exterior mirrors CB7 suspension - removed (now available as option only) S28 back in C00 package Packages FJ1 and FJ5 back in packages CB7 suspension Options V48 floor piece SuSi available for 3500 144" models MY 2021 Dealer Ordering Guide MY21 MSRP Overview Model GVWR Wheelbase Engine Roof MB Model FTL Model Baumuster MSRP* 1500 (8,550 GVW) 144" WB Gas Standard roof M1CA4G F1CA4G 907.643.13 $ 36,355 Gas Standard roof M2CA4G F2CA4G 907.643.13 $ 37,585 144'' WB 4 Cyl Standard roof M2CA44 F2CA44 907.643.13 $ 40,735 2500 Gas High roof M2CA7G F2CA7G 907.645.13 $ 43,060 (9,040 GVW) 170'' WB 4 Cyl High roof M2CA74 F2CA74 907.645.13 $ 46,210 170'' WB Ext. 4 Cyl High roof M2CAE4 F2CAE4 907.647.13 $ 48,110 144" WB 4 Cyl High roof M3CA44 F3CA44 907.653.13 $ 43,145 Cargo Vans 3500 170" WB 4 Cyl High roof M3CA74 F3CA74 907.655.13 $ 48,620 170'' WB Ext. 4 Cyl High roof M3CAE4 F3CAE4 907.657.13 $ 50,520 144" WB 4 Cyl Standard roof MXCA44 FXCA44 907.653.13 $ 45,555 3500XD 170'' WB 4 Cyl High roof MXCA74 FXCA74 907.655.13 (11,030 GVW) $ 51,030 170'' WB Ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Fock–Goncharov Coordinates for Semisimple Lie Groups
    FOCK–GONCHAROV COORDINATES FOR SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS S. GILLES Abstract. Fock and Goncharov [FG06b] introduced cluster ensembles, providing a framework for coordi- nates on varieties of surface representations into Lie groups, as well as a complete construction for groups of type An. Later, Zickert [Zic19], Le [Le16b], [Le16a], and Ip [Ip18] described, using differing methods, how to apply this framework for other Lie group types. Zickert also showed that this framework applies to triangulated 3-manifolds. We present a complete, general construction, based on work of Fomin and Zelevinsky. In particular, we complete the picture for the remaining cases: Lie groups of types F4, E6, E7, and E8. Contents Acknowledgements 2 1. Introduction 2 1.1. Classical Teichmüller space 2 1.2. Cluster ensemble structures 4 1.3. Higher Teichmüller spaces 5 1.4. Results 7 1.5. Historical context 7 2. Ingredients 8 2.1. Root spaces and Weyl groups 8 2.2. Unipotent subgroups 9 2.3. Coxeter elements 9 2.4. Generalized minors 9 2.5. Factorization coordinates 11 2.6. Quivers 11 2.7. Cluster ensembles 12 3. Key identities 13 3.1. Actions of a dubs 13 3.2. Actions of σG 13 3.3. Grid exchange relations 14 4. Coordinates on generically-decorated representations 15 4.1. Configurations and gluings 16 arXiv:2104.04941v1 [math.GT] 11 Apr 2021 4.2. Triangular quivers and Fock–Goncharov coordinate structures 17 4.3. From coordinates to representations 21 4.4. Regarding 3-manifolds 23 5. Main Result: Fock–Goncharov coordinate structures for non-An 23 5.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Experience a Lower Total Cost of Ownership
    EXPERIENCE A LOWER TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP Timken® Spherical Roller Bearings are engineered to give you more of what you need. Lower Operating Temperatures Rollers are guided by cage pockets—not a center guide ring—eliminating a friction point and resulting in 4–10% less rotational torque and 5ºC lower operating temperatures.* Less rotational torque leads to improved efficiency, lower energy consumption and more savings. Lower temperatures reduce the oil oxidation rate by 50% to extend lubricant life. Tougher Protection Hardened steel cages deliver greater fatigue strength, increased wear resistance and tougher protection against shock and acceleration. Optimized Uptime Unique slots in the cage face improve oil flow and purge more contaminants from the bearing to help extend equipment uptime. Minimized Wear Improved profiles reduce internal stresses and optimize load distribution to minimize wear. Improved Lube Film Enhanced surface finishes avoid metal-to-metal contact to reduce friction and result in improved lube film. Higher Loads Longer rollers result in 4–8% higher load ratings or 14–29% longer predicted bearing life. Higher load ratings enable you to carry heavier loads. Brass Cages Available in all sizes; ready when you need extra strength and durability in the most unrelenting conditions, including extreme shock and vibration, high acceleration forces, and minimal lubrication. Increase your operational efficiencies and extend maintenance intervals. Starting now. Visit Timken.com/spherical to find out more. *All results are from head-to-head
    [Show full text]
  • Case I,I,Emptyset,P7.Nb
    Definitions: In[56]:= $Assumptions = w12 ≥ 0 && w13 ≥ 0 && w16 ≥ 0 && w24 ≥ 0 && w25 ≥ 0 && w36 ≥ 0 && w45 ≥ 0 && u > 0 && v > 0 && w21 ≥ 0 && w31 ≥ 0 && w61 ≥ 0 && w42 ≥ 0 && w52 ≥ 0 && w63 ≥ 0 && w54 ≥ 0 && K34 > 0 && K56 > 0 && K31 > 0 && K51 > 0 w = {{0, w12, w13, 0, 0, w16}, {w21, 0, 0, w24, w25, 0}, {w31, 0, 0, u, 0, w36}, {0, w42, u / K34, 0, w45, 0}, {0, w52, 0, w54, 0, v}, {w61, 0, w63, 0, v / K56, 0}} Out[56]= w12 ≥ 0 && w13 ≥ 0 && w16 ≥ 0 && w24 ≥ 0 && w25 ≥ 0 && w36 ≥ 0 && w45 ≥ 0 && u > 0 && v > 0 && w21 ≥ 0 && w31 ≥ 0 && w61 ≥ 0 && w42 ≥ 0 && w52 ≥ 0 && w63 ≥ 0 && w54 ≥ 0 && K34 > 0 && K56 > 0 && K31 > 0 && K51 > 0 Out[57]= {0, w12, w13, 0, 0, w16}, {w21, 0, 0, w24, w25, 0}, {w31, 0, 0, u, 0, w36}, u v 0, w42, , 0, w45, 0, {0, w52, 0, w54, 0, v}, w61, 0, w63, 0, , 0 K34 K56 In[58]:= MatrixForm[w] Out[58]//MatrixForm= 0 w12 w13 0 0 w16 w21 0 0 w24 w25 0 w31 0 0 u 0 w36 0 w42 u 0 w45 0 K34 0 w52 0 w54 0 v w61 0 w63 0 v 0 K56 Sum of rows In[59]:= d = Table[Total[w[[i, All]]], {i, 6}] d34 = Collect[Expand[d[[3]] * d[[4]] - w[[3, 4]] * w[[4, 3]]], u] d56 = Collect[Expand[d[[5]] * d[[6]] - w[[5, 6]] * w[[6, 5]]], v] u v Out[59]= w12 + w13 + w16, w21 + w24 + w25, u + w31 + w36, + w42 + w45, v + w52 + w54, + w61 + w63 K34 K56 w31 w36 Out[60]= w31 w42 + w36 w42 + w31 w45 + w36 w45 + u + + w42 + w45 K34 K34 w52 w54 Out[61]= w52 w61 + w54 w61 + w52 w63 + w54 w63 + v + + w61 + w63 K56 K56 Effective reaction rates after elimination of metabolites 5 and 6 (useful for easy differentiation w.r.to u), and the final effective reaction rate
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Health Through Evidence-Based Probiotics
    Improving health through evidence-based probiotics Company Profile & Probiotic Portfolio wincloveprobiotics.com vw Company Profile Winclove Probiotics Developing probiotic formulations since 1991 with a strong emphasis on research Winclove Probiotics, established in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, has been specializing in research, development and manufacturing of probiotic formulations for over 25 years. Our probiotic formulations are developed in close collaboration with leading research institutes, universities and academic hospitals. This enables us to develop innovative multispecies probiotic formulations for many different health indications. We continuously invest in research and technologies in order to develop the most effective probiotics that ensure end-users with the best solution. Looking for business opportunities? Winclove’s mission is to create long-lasting, sustainable and strategic partnerships. To achieve this, we offer innovative, high-quality and competitive probiotic solutions, as well as in-house scientific expertise and sales support. Our indication-specific formulations are designed for specific microbiota-related indications. The thorough substantiation of our probiotic formulations with scien- tific and clinical evidence makes them ideal for selling medically endorsed. We are a committed business partner and are looking forward to starting a fruitful collaboration with you! Product package Dossiers Technical lab analysis, in vitro data, etc. Clinical in vivo studies, Development of Probiotic blend post market studies,
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Nuclear Power 1939 – 2018 Part 1 Introduction
    Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018 Part 1: Introduction Peter Lobner July 2018 1 Foreword In 2015, I compiled the first edition of this resource document to support a presentation I made in August 2015 to The Lyncean Group of San Diego (www.lynceans.org) commemorating the 60th anniversary of the world’s first “underway on nuclear power” by USS Nautilus on 17 January 1955. That presentation to the Lyncean Group, “60 years of Marine Nuclear Power: 1955 – 2015,” was my attempt to tell a complex story, starting from the early origins of the US Navy’s interest in marine nuclear propulsion in 1939, resetting the clock on 17 January 1955 with USS Nautilus’ historic first voyage, and then tracing the development and exploitation of marine nuclear power over the next 60 years in a remarkable variety of military and civilian vessels created by eight nations. In July 2018, I finished a complete update of the resource document and changed the title to, “Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018.” What you have here is Part 1: Introduction. The other parts are: Part 2A: United States - Submarines Part 2B: United States - Surface Ships Part 3A: Russia - Submarines Part 3B: Russia - Surface Ships & Non-propulsion Marine Nuclear Applications Part 4: Europe & Canada Part 5: China, India, Japan and Other Nations Part 6: Arctic Operations 2 Foreword This resource document was compiled from unclassified, open sources in the public domain. I acknowledge the great amount of work done by others who have published material in print or posted information on the internet pertaining to international marine nuclear propulsion programs, naval and civilian nuclear powered vessels, naval weapons systems, and other marine nuclear applications.
    [Show full text]
  • CHICAGO PUBLIC LEAGUE CHESS CHAMPIONSHIP JANUARY 28, 2012 8-Board Varsity Standings No. Name St Rate 1 2
    CHICAGO PUBLIC LEAGUE CHESS CHAMPIONSHIP JANUARY 28, 2012 8-Board Varsity Standings No. Name St Rate 1 2 3 4 Score 1. Northside (2)................. 1398 W7,63.5 W4,63.0 W9,68.0 W2,36.0 4.0 2. Young (1)..................... 1609 W6,68.0 W3,68.0 W5,68.0 L1,32.0 3.0 3. Lane (4)...................... 1372 W10,52.0 L2,0.0 W6,45.0 W5,48.0 3.0 4. Lincoln Park (6).............. 1144 W11,50.0 L1,5.0 W7,63.0 W8,62.0 3.0 5. Jones (5)..................... 1330 W12,63.0 W8,56.0 L2,0.0 L3,20.0 2.0 6. Kelly (7)..................... 1074 L2,0.0 W11,58.0 L3,23.0 W9,65.5 2.0 7. Lake View (8)................. 956 L1,4.5 W12,50.0 L4,5.0 W11,36.0 2.0 8. Marshall (9).................. 866 W9,42.0 L5,12.0 W10,37.0 L4,6.0 2.0 9. Hubbard (3)................... 1373 L8,26.0 W10,35.0 L1,0.0 L6,2.5 1.0 10. Ace (10)...................... 787 L3,16.0 L9,33.0 L8,31.0 W12,64.0 1.0 11. King (11)..................... nnnn L4,18.0 L6,10.0 W12,54.0 L7,32.0 1.0 12. Noble Street (12)............. nnnn L5,5.0 L7,18.0 L11,14.0 L10,4.0 0.0 Board Cross Tables No. Name Rate 1 2 3 4 Score BOARD 1 1. Schmakel, Sam a, Young....................... 2076 W2 W5 W7 W3 4.0 2.
    [Show full text]