DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation Report VA National Rules

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation Report VA National Rules Evaluation Report – National rules RST&CCS ERA-PRG-006-REP-RST Contents Contents 2 List of Figures ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 List of Tables ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 1 REFERENCES, DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................. 4 1.1 Reference Documents ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Definitions and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................. 4 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 5 3 SCOPE OF THIS REPORT ....................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Scope in terms of vehicle and national rules ...................................................................................... 7 3.2 Corresponding parameters in List of Parameters and RDD for the national rules ............................. 9 4 GENERAL RESULTS OF THE EXAMINATION OF NATIONAL RULES AND ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL MEANS OF COMPLIANCE ................................................................................................ 12 5 EVALUATION REPORT PER MEMBER STATE ...................................................................................... 16 5.1 Member state AT .............................................................................................................................. 17 5.2 Member state BE .............................................................................................................................. 18 5.3 Member state BG .............................................................................................................................. 30 5.4 Member state CH .............................................................................................................................. 34 5.5 Member state CZ ............................................................................................................................... 57 5.6 Member state DE .............................................................................................................................. 63 5.7 Member state DK ............................................................................................................................ 109 5.8 Member state EE ............................................................................................................................. 113 5.9 Member state ES ............................................................................................................................. 119 5.10 Member state EL ............................................................................................................................. 132 5.11 Member state FI .............................................................................................................................. 138 5.12 Member state FR ............................................................................................................................. 145 5.13 Member state HU ............................................................................................................................ 165 5.14 Member state HR ............................................................................................................................ 176 5.15 Member state IE .............................................................................................................................. 179 5.16 Member state IT .............................................................................................................................. 180 5.17 Member state LT ............................................................................................................................. 212 5.18 Member state LU ............................................................................................................................ 219 5.19 Member state LV ............................................................................................................................. 233 5.20 Member state NL ............................................................................................................................ 240 5.21 Member state NO ........................................................................................................................... 267 5.22 Member state PL ............................................................................................................................. 278 5.23 Member state PT ............................................................................................................................. 287 5.24 Member state RO ............................................................................................................................ 294 5.25 Member state SE ............................................................................................................................. 298 5.26 Member state SI .............................................................................................................................. 306 5.27 Member state SK ............................................................................................................................. 314 2 Evaluation Report – National rules RST&CCS ERA-PRG-006-REP-RST 5.28 Member state UK - GB .................................................................................................................... 321 5.29 Member state Channel Tunnel ....................................................................................................... 337 5.30 Member state UK (for Northern Ireland) ........................................................................................ 341 List of Figures Not Applicable List of Tables Table 1 : Table of Reference Documents Table 2 : Number of national rules notified by Member states and results of the examination 3 Evaluation Report – National rules RST&CCS ERA-PRG-006-REP-RST 1 REFERENCES, DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS 1.1 Reference Documents Table 1 : Table of Reference Documents [Ref. N°] Title Reference Version [1] Plan for Rules cleaning-up – Overview ERA-PRG-006-EXT 1.0 [2] Annex I - Remaining national technical rules applicable to vehicles ERA-PRG-006-Annex I 23/03/2016 [3] List of parameters to be used for classifying national rules Imp.Dec.(EU)2015/2299 17/11/2015 [4] Mid term report Cleaning up of national rules ERA-PRG-006-REP Mid term V 1.0 [5] Rules cleaning up programe plan ERA-PRG-006-PPL V 2.0 1.2 Definitions and Abbreviations 1.2.1 Standard Terms and Abbreviations LoP: List of parameters RDD: Reference Document Database RINF: Register of Infrastructure TSI OPE: TSI relating to ‘operation and traffic management’ subsystem MS: Member State of EU 1.2.2 Specific Terms and Abbreviations - Not Applicable 4 Evaluation Report – National rules RST&CCS ERA-PRG-006-REP-RST 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMMARY In the context of interoperability, for the management of the shared railway system that forms the single European Railway Area, rules in the form of TSIs are an essential tool for the safe and cost-effective management of the railway system. Rules in the form of national rules are also an essential tool for the management of shared national legacy systems (e.g. the CCS class B systems). The presence and enforcement of national rules preserves the benefits of national interoperability and prevents further national system diversity beyond the minimum needed during the transition to the target system. Furthermore, the absence or non-transparency of appropriate rules leads to unnecessary uncertainty, costs and safety risks. Since the scope extension of TSIs (with effect on 01 January 2015), a situation with too many, and sometimes contradictory or unjustified national rules is not acceptable. The “cleaning-up” of unnecessary national rules was therefore a fundamental and urgent action to remove technical regulatory barriers to the open market, international operation and interoperability. The Agency started beginning of 2016 a programme (see ERA programme plan ERA-PRG-006-PPL) where the Member States and the Agency worked together on the identification, evaluation and cleaning-up of national rules for vehicle authorisation in addition to the TSIs for vehicles in force. In order to carried-out this cleaning-up, the Member States were asked to : - Identify and withdraw the national rules covered by TSIs refered to in section 3.1.2, - Relate the national rules to the TSIs and to the new list of parameters (decision 2015/2299/EU), - Clearly identify the national rules that are not related to open point(s) nor specific case(s) to TSI requirements and specify if they complement/contradict/replace TSIs for technical compatibility with existing networks, - Ensure that the requirement is a mandatory rule. Acceptable national means of compliance in accordance to the definition in article 2 (34) of directive 2016/797 is not considered as a national rule, - Identify and analyse requirements that don’t relate to any of the above and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ERTMS/ETCS Railway Signalling
    Appendix A ERTMS/ETCS Railway Signalling Salvatore Sabina, Fabio Poli and Nazelie Kassabian A.1 Interoperable Constituents The basic interoperability constituents in the Control-Command and Signalling Sub- systems are, respectively, defined in TableA.1 for the Control-Command and Sig- nalling On-board Subsystem [1] and TableA.2 for the Control-Command and Sig- nalling Trackside Subsystem [1]. The functions of basic interoperability constituents may be combined to form a group. This group is then defined by those functions and by its remaining exter- nal interfaces. If a group is formed in this way, it shall be considered as an inter- operability constituent. TableA.3 lists the groups of interoperability constituents of the Control-Command and Signalling On-board Subsystem [1]. TableA.4 lists the groups of interoperability constituents of the Control-Command and Signalling Trackside Subsystem [1]. S. Sabina (B) Ansaldo STS S.p.A, Via Paolo Mantovani 3-5, 16151 Genova, Italy e-mail: [email protected] F. Poli Ansaldo STS S.p.A, Via Ferrante Imparato 184, 80147 Napoli, Italy e-mail: [email protected] N. Kassabian Ansaldo STS S.p.A, Via Volvera 50, 10045 Piossasco Torino, Italy e-mail: [email protected] © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 233 L. Lo Presti and S. Sabina (eds.), GNSS for Rail Transportation,PoliTO Springer Series, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79084-8 234 Appendix A: ERTMS/ETCS Railway Signalling Table A.1 Basic interoperability constituents in the Control-Command
    [Show full text]
  • EULYNX the Next Generation Signalling Strategy for Europe
    European Initiative Linking Interlocking Subsystems EULYNX The next generation signalling strategy for Europe Signalling Seminar IRSE ITC – JR East Frans Heijnen 7 April 2016 With thanks to Maarten van der Werff What would you do? European Initiative Linking Interlocking Subsystems Situation: • You are an infra manager (…. passenger, tax payer) • Expectations concerning signalling • Huge installed base • Many generations of equipment • Obsolete within 10..20 years • Not enough budget to replace And you know: “At all European railways these problems are similar …” EULYNX 2 What is the problem? European Initiative Linking Interlocking Subsystems • Each railway project adds new assets to become obsolete again • They get overage sooner than expected • Costs depend on whoever was chosen in the past as the supplier of the system • There are potential savings but the railway is stuck with current solutions • But you don’t have a strategy for a new solution EULYNX 3 EULYNX. What is EULYNX? European Initiative Linking Interlocking Subsystems EULYNX is the strategic approach for standardisation of signalling systems Because standardisation is a key factor to reduce: • A ‘technology zoo’ with many different systems, • The number of multiple incompatible interfaces • The cost involved in replacing and renewal EULYNX 4 The vision that becomes reality European Initiative Linking Interlocking Subsystems By systems engineering and the development process • Use a common architecture • With a common apportionment of functionalities • Define standardised
    [Show full text]
  • PROVÁDĚCÍ NAŘÍZENÍ KOMISE (EU) 2019/773 Ze Dne 16
    27.5.2019 CS Úřední věstník Evropské unie L 139 I/5 PROVÁDĚCÍ NAŘÍZENÍ KOMISE (EU) 2019/773 ze dne 16. května 2019 o technické specifikaci pro interoperabilitu týkající se subsystému „provoz a řízení dopravy“ železničního systému v Evropské unii a o zrušení rozhodnutí 2012/757/EU (Text s významem pro EHP) EVROPSKÁ KOMISE, s ohledem na Smlouvu o fungování Evropské unie, s ohledem na směrnici Evropského parlamentu a Rady (EU) 2016/797 ze dne 11. května 2016 o interoperabilitě železničního systému v Evropské unii (1) a zejména na čl. 5 odst. 11 uvedené směrnice, vzhledem k těmto důvodům: (1) Článek 11 rozhodnutí Komise v přenesené pravomoci (EU) 2017/1474 (2) vymezuje konkrétní cíle pro vypracování, přijetí a přezkum technických specifikací pro interoperabilitu (TSI) železničního systému v Unii. (2) Podle čl. 3 odst. 5 písm. b) a f) rozhodnutí (EU) 2017/1474 by TSI měly být přezkoumány s cílem zohlednit vývoj železničního systému Unie a souvisejících činností v oblasti výzkumu a inovací a aktualizovat odkazy na normy. (3) Podle čl. 3 odst. 5 písm. c) rozhodnutí (EU) 2017/1474 by TSI měly být přezkoumány s cílem uzavřít zbývající otevřené body. Je třeba zejména vymezit rozsah otevřených bodů týkajících se provozu a rozlišit mezi příslušnými vnitrostátními předpisy a pravidly vyžadujícími harmonizaci prostřednictvím práva Unie s cílem umožnit přechod na interoperabilní systém a vymezit optimální úroveň technické harmonizace. (4) Dne 22. září 2017 Komise v souladu s čl. 19 odst. 1 nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady (EU) 2016/796 (3) požádala Agenturu Evropské unie pro železnice (dále jen „agentura“), aby připravila doporučení pro provedení výběru konkrétních cílů stanovených v rozhodnutí (EU) 2017/1474.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Level Crossing Protection Equipment
    Engineering Procedure Signalling CRN SM 013 ROAD LEVEL CROSSING PROTECTION EQUIPMENT Version 2.0 Issued December 2013 Owner: Principal Signal Engineer Approved by: Stewart Rendell Authorised by: Glenn Dewberry Disclaimer. This document was prepared for use on the CRN Network only. John Holland Rail Pty Ltd makes no warranties, express or implied, that compliance with the contents of this document shall be sufficient to ensure safe systems or work or operation. It is the document user’s sole responsibility to ensure that the copy of the document it is viewing is the current version of the document as in use by JHR. JHR accepts no liability whatsoever in relation to the use of this document by any party, and JHR excludes any liability which arises in any manner by the use of this document. Copyright. The information in this document is protected by Copyright and no part of this document may be reproduced, altered, stored or transmitted by any person without the prior consent of JHR. © JHR UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED Page 1 of 66 Issued December 2013 Version 2.0 CRN Engineering Procedure - Signalling CRN SM 013 Road Level Crossing Protection Equipment Document control Revision Date of Approval Summary of change 1.0 June 1999 RIC Standard SC 07 60 01 00 EQ Version 1.0 June 1999. 1.0 July 2011 Conversion to CRN Signalling Standard CRN SM 013. 2.0 December 2013 Inclusion of Safetran S40 and S60 Mechanisms, reformatting of figures and tables, and updating text Summary of changes from previous version Section Summary of change All Include automated
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Train Control System on Railway Track Capacity
    DAAAM INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC BOOK 2012 pp. 419-426 CHAPTER 36 INFLUENCE OF TRAIN CONTROL SYSTEM ON RAILWAY TRACK CAPACITY HARAMINA, H.; BRABEC, D. & GRGIC, D. Abstract: The basic advantage of the train control methods based on the moving block technology compared to the fixed blocks where the headways of the slower trains, regarding their longer blocking times affects negatively the line capacity, lies in the fact that the position and the length of the moving blocks adapts to the position, dynamic characteristics, and actual speed of the successive train. Regarding a higher possibility for influence on the train movement characteristic during the moving block train operation, better traffic fluidity with more regular traffic flow can be achieved. Considering this fact an amount of regular recovery and buffer times needed for railway timetable stability can be decreased and thus more train paths in a particular dedicated time window can be added. In this way the moving block technology can increase the capacity of a railway line, especially in case of high density lines with significant heterogeneity of traffic. Key words: train control system, railway infrastructure capacity, moving block Authors´ data: Dr. Sc. Haramina, H[rvoje]; dipl.ing. Brabec, D[ean]* Dr. Sc. Grgić, D[amir]**; *University of Zagreb, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences, Vukelićeva 4, Zagreb, Croatia, **Hrvatske željeznice, Mihanovićeva 12, Zagreb, Croatia; [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] This Publication has to be referred as: Haramina H[rvoje]; Brabec, D[ean] & Grgić, D[amir] (2012). Influence of Train Control System on Railway Track Capacity, Chapter 36 in DAAAM International Scientific Book 2012, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • BACKTRACK 22-1 2008:Layout 1 21/11/07 14:14 Page 1
    BACKTRACK 22-1 2008:Layout 1 21/11/07 14:14 Page 1 BRITAIN‘S LEADING HISTORICAL RAILWAY JOURNAL VOLUME 22 • NUMBER 1 • JANUARY 2008 • £3.60 IN THIS ISSUE 150 YEARS OF THE SOMERSET & DORSET RAILWAY GWR RAILCARS IN COLOUR THE NORTH CORNWALL LINE THE FURNESS LINE IN COLOUR PENDRAGON BRITISH ENGLISH-ELECTRIC MANUFACTURERS PUBLISHING THE GWR EXPRESS 4-4-0 CLASSES THE COMPREHENSIVE VOICE OF RAILWAY HISTORY BACKTRACK 22-1 2008:Layout 1 21/11/07 15:59 Page 64 THE COMPREHENSIVE VOICE OF RAILWAY HISTORY END OF THE YEAR AT ASHBY JUNCTION A light snowfall lends a crisp feel to this view at Ashby Junction, just north of Nuneaton, on 29th December 1962. Two LMS 4-6-0s, Class 5 No.45058 piloting ‘Jubilee’ No.45592 Indore, whisk the late-running Heysham–London Euston ‘Ulster Express’ past the signal box in a flurry of steam, while 8F 2-8-0 No.48349 waits to bring a freight off the Ashby & Nuneaton line. As the year draws to a close, steam can ponder upon the inexorable march south of the West Coast Main Line electrification. (Tommy Tomalin) PENDRAGON PUBLISHING www.pendragonpublishing.co.uk BACKTRACK 22-1 2008:Layout 1 21/11/07 14:17 Page 4 SOUTHERN GONE WEST A busy scene at Halwill Junction on 31st August 1964. BR Class 4 4-6-0 No.75022 is approaching with the 8.48am from Padstow, THE NORTH CORNWALL while Class 4 2-6-4T No.80037 waits to shape of the ancient Bodmin & Wadebridge proceed with the 10.00 Okehampton–Padstow.
    [Show full text]
  • Compendium on Deliberations of Electrical Standards Committee
    COMPENDIUM ON DELIBERATIONS OF ELECTRICAL STANDARDS COMMITTEE (1935-2014) ISSUED ON 26-10-2015 BY ELECTRICAL DIRECTORATE RESEARCH DESIGNS AND STANDARDS ORGANISATION MANAK NAGAR, LUCKNOW-226 011 Compendium of ESC 1935-2014 Page 1 INDEX S. No. DETAILS PAGE No. 1. FORWARD 3 2. OBJECTIVE OF ESC 4 3. DELIBERATIONS: 1st to 5th 7-53 4. DELIBERATIONS: 6th to 10th 54-104 5. DELIBERATIONS:11th to 15th 105-157 6. DELIBERATIONS:16th to 20th 158-200 7. DELIBERATIONS:21st to 25th 201-252 8. DELIBERATIONS:26th to 30th 253-301 9. DELIBERATIONS:31st to 35th 302-351 10. DELIBERATIONS:36th to 40th 352-382 11. DELIBERATIONS:41st to 45th 383-411 12. DELIBERATIONS:46th to 50th 412-445 13. DELIBERATIONS:51st to 55th 446-485 14. DELIBERATIONS:56th to 59th 486-525 Compendium of ESC 1935-2014 Page 2 FOREWORD Electrical Standards Committee (ESC) is a highest forum for Railway Electrical Engineers to discuss various issues pertaining to Electrical Department for efficient and economical train operation. This compendium will provide a glimpse of the events and technological upgradation over last 80 years since inception of this committee. As very old records were not available easily, efforts have been made to collect as much records for the ESC, particularly for pre-independence period. Initially separate ESC meetings used to be held for General Services and Traction. From 49th ESC onward, which was held in January’1999 at Pune, a decision was taken to convene a common ESC meeting for all items of Electrical department. This compendium will be updated regularly so that all the records are available at one place.
    [Show full text]
  • FERRMED LOCOMOTIVE CONCEPT STUDY 1 2.Pdf
    FERRMED FREIGHT LOCOMOTIVE CONCEPT STUDY By: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 What is FERRMED? ....................................................................................................... 4 1.2 FERRMED Objectives .................................................................................................... 5 1.3 The FERRMED Standards.............................................................................................. 5 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 7 3 EUROPEAN NETWORK CHARACTERISTICS .................................................................... 9 4 INTEROPERABILITY AND CROSS-ACCEPTANCE .......................................................... 12 4.1 Interoperability .............................................................................................................. 12 4.2 ERTMS.......................................................................................................................... 18 4.3 Cross-Acceptance ......................................................................................................... 21 5 STATE-OF-THE-ART WORLDWIDE LOCOMOTIVES ....................................................... 23 6 REQUIRED STARTING TRACTIVE EFFORT AND POWER TO HAUL “FERRMED TRAINS” .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Balise Lifecheck the Control of Balises Is Mainly Manual and Often Basic
    utomation of Balise A maintenance Balise LifeCheck The control of balises is mainly manual and often basic. There are several tools available on the market to help performing balise maintenance, but a vast majority of them follow a corrective approach. ERTMS Solutions’ BaliseLifeCheck is the only on-board tool able to do predictive maintenance. he Tsolution • Compatibility with all balises’ and legacy KER balises (KVB, EBICAB,...) • Geolocalization of the balises and creation of a cartography • Detection of possible Big Metal Masses on the track that will affect BTM performances • Computation of a signature on measurements • Auto-marking on all balises matching signature • Generation of a full report after each test journey The BaliseLifeCheck is a preventive balise measurement instrument that can be used on both diagnostic and commercial trains. While capable of measuring balise, the BaliseLifeCheck is also highly customizable and can be set-up to deliver preventive maintenance to any ‘legacy’ Automatic Train Protection (ATP) balises, regardless if they are fitted or not with ERTMS. The Benefits On-board The system has been designed to be installed on-board a test or maintenance train which purpose is to analyze test tracks and active lines. Measurement It measures key electrical parameters of the up link signal and verifies if they comply with the requirements of Subset-036 in the case of ETCS balises. In this case some measurements/tests are performed against requirements of Subset-085. Diagnosis The main goal of the tool is to provide measurements and evidences which assess the correct behavior of balises that are already deployed on the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Nessun Titolo Diapositiva
    Ordine degli Ingegneri della Provincia di Palermo con il patrocinio di AICQ Sicilia Trasporti: politiche, qualità e soluzioni Palermo, 14 - 02 - 2014 L’evoluzione delle politiche ferroviarie in Sicilia Collegio Ingegneri Sezione di Ferroviari Dott. Ing. Mario La Rocca Palermo Italiani Le origini delle ferrovie in Sicilia • Il decreto di Garibaldi • In Sicilia, fino al 1860, sotto il governo borbonico non era stata costruita alcuna ferrovia, mentre nel resto d’Italia erano in esercizio 2592 Km di ferrovie, di cui solo 128 Km nel Regno delle Due Sicilie. • Garibaldi pose le premesse per dotare la Sicilia di una rete ferroviaria emanando lo storico decreto del 25 giugno 1860 che disponeva la costruzione di una ferrovia da Palermo a Messina passando per Caltanissetta e Catania. Collegio Ingegneri L'evoluzione delle politiche ferroviarie in 2 Sezione di Ferroviari Palermo Italiani Sicilia Il massimo sviluppo della rete siciliana • Nei primi anni ‘50 la rete ferroviaria della Sicilia raggiunge il massimo sviluppo chilometrico. – NB: la Caltagirone - Gela è stata aperta all’esercizio nel 1979. Collegio Ingegneri L'evoluzione delle politiche ferroviarie in 3 Sezione di Ferroviari Palermo Italiani Sicilia L’attuale contesto infrastrutturale siciliano Collegio Ingegneri L'evoluzione delle politiche ferroviarie in 4 Sezione di Ferroviari Palermo Italiani Sicilia L’assetto Istituzionale FS MINISTERO DEI TRASPORTI AZIENDA ENTE FS SpA AUTONOMA FS FS Collegio Ingegneri L'evoluzione delle politiche ferroviarie in 5 Sezione di Ferroviari Palermo Italiani Sicilia L’assetto Istituzionale FS 1905 - AZIENDA AUTONOMA delle FERROVIE dello STATO (L. 22/4/1905 n°137) Amministrazione autonoma sotto direzione e responsabilità Ministeriali. Bilancio distinto da quello dell’organo politico di controllo Collegio Ingegneri L'evoluzione delle politiche ferroviarie in 6 Sezione di Ferroviari Palermo Italiani Sicilia L’assetto Istituzionale FS 1986 - Ente “FERROVIE dello STATO” (L.
    [Show full text]
  • Irse News Issue 161 November 2010 Irse Careers Page and Job Board
    IRSE NEWS ISSUE 161 NOVEMBER 2010 IRSE CAREERS PAGE AND JOB BOARD The IRSE Careers site is now live at www.irse.org/careers Here you can view signalling job vacancies, fi nd out about other careers options, and contact recruiting companies to help you fi nd the next step in your career. For more information on the advertising and branding opportunities available, please contact Joe Brooks on +44 (0)20 657 1801 or [email protected]. Front Cover: Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern train Second 170, bound from Minneapolis, Minnesota to Kansas City, Missouri, passes the radio-activated switch at the north siding switch Eckards, Iowa, on 4 October 2009. This is one of several locations on the DM&E system where radio-activated switches are used to expedite train operations without the expense of a full Centralized Traffic Control (CTC) installation. Photo by Jon Roma NEWS VIEW 161 Let’s plan for the future IRSE NEWS is published monthly by the Institution of The UK Government has unveiled their spending review during October, pledging to Railway Signal Engineers (IRSE). The IRSE is not as a invest more than 30 billion pounds on transport projects over the next four years, with body responsible for the opinions expressed in IRSE NEWS. this sector seen as a particular key driver for economic growth and productivity. © Copyright 2010, IRSE. All rights reserved. This includes 14 billion pounds of funding that will go to Network Rail to support No part of this publication may be reproduced, maintenance and investment, including improvements to the East Coast Main Line, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any station upgrades around the West Midlands and signal replacement programmes in form or by any means without the permission in writing of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Train Sim World 2 Southeastern High Speed Driver's Manual EN.Pdf
    EN SOUTHEASTERN HIGH SPEED ©2021 Dovetail Games, a trading name of RailSimulator.com Limited (“DTG”). "Dovetail Games", “Train Sim World” and “SimuGraph” are trademarks or registered trademarks of DTG. Unreal® Engine, ©1998-2021, Epic Games, Inc. All rights reserved. Unreal® is a registered trademark of Epic Games. Portions of this software utilise SpeedTree® technology (©2014 Interactive Data Visualization, Inc.). SpeedTree® is a registered trademark of Interactive Data Visualization, Inc. All rights reserved. Southeastern is the registered trade mark of The Go-Ahead Group PLC. Permission to use the Double Arrow Trade Mark is granted by the Secretary of State for Transport. All other copyrights or trademarks are the property of their respective owners and are used here with permission. Unauthorised copying, adaptation, rental, re-sale, arcade use, charging for use, broadcast, cable transmission, public performance, distribution or extraction of the product or any trademark or copyright work that forms part of this product is prohibited. Developed and published by DTG. CONTENTS 1 SOUTHEASTERN HIGH SPEED OVERVIEW 5 TRAIN SAFETY & IN-CAB SIGNALLING SYSTEMS 5 INTRODUCING SOUTHEASTERN HIGH SPEED 43 AUTOMATIC WARNING SYSTEM (AWS) 6 ROUTE MAP & POINTS OF INTEREST 44 TRAIN PROTECTION & WARNING SYSTEM (TPWS) 7 GAME MODES 45 KVB 2 THE BR CLASS 395 'JAVELIN' 47 TVM-430 8 INTRODUCING THE BR CLASS 395 'JAVELIN' 6 BRITISH RAILWAY SIGNALLING 9 BR CLASS 395 DRIVING CAB: FRONT 50 COLOUR LIGHT 10 BR CLASS 395 DRIVING CAB: REAR 56 SEMAPHORE 11 BR CLASS
    [Show full text]