DOCSLIB.ORG

Contract Documents For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Contract Documents For Contract documents for A20 – Invitation to tender for regular bus services in Movia Trafikselskabet Movia Contracts January 2021 A20 – Invitation to tender for regular bus services page 2 Table of Contents 1. General conditions of contract ............................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Questions .......................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2 Prequalification .................................................................................................................................. 11 1.2.1 Request for prequalification ........................................................................................................ 11 1.2.2 Grounds for exclusion ................................................................................................................. 12 1.2.3 Suitability ..................................................................................................................................... 12 1.2.4 Selection...................................................................................................................................... 12 1.2.5 Documentation for suitability and fulfilment of selection criteria ................................................. 13 1.3 Submission of tenders ....................................................................................................................... 13 1.3.1 Tenderers .................................................................................................................................... 13 1.3.2 Requirements and terms ............................................................................................................. 13 1.3.3 Submission of tenders in general ................................................................................................ 14 1.3.4 Possible combinations ................................................................................................................ 14 1.3.5 Options ........................................................................................................................................ 14 1.3.6 Alternative bids/variants .............................................................................................................. 15 1.3.7 Content of the tender .................................................................................................................. 15 1.3.8 Deadline for submission of tenders ............................................................................................. 19 1.4 Negotiations ....................................................................................................................................... 20 1.4.1 Negotiation phases ..................................................................................................................... 20 1.5 Evaluation .......................................................................................................................................... 21 1.5.1 Sub-criteria .................................................................................................................................. 21 1.5.2 Final evaluation ........................................................................................................................... 27 1.6 Documentation of exclusion, suitability and selection ....................................................................... 27 1.7 Conclusion of the contract ................................................................................................................. 27 1.8 Cancellation ....................................................................................................................................... 28 1.9 Right of access to documents and publication .................................................................................. 28 2. Scope of tender ..................................................................................................................................... 29 2.1 Material changes to current timetables ............................................................................................. 32 2.2 Vehicle schedules for payment ......................................................................................................... 32 2.2.1 Changes to vehicle schedules for payment ................................................................................ 32 2.2.2 Timetable changes ...................................................................................................................... 33 2.3 Timetable hours and layover ............................................................................................................. 33 Trafikselskabet Movia January 2021 A20 – Invitation to tender for regular bus services page 3 2.3.1 Calculation of timetable hours and extra time ............................................................................. 34 2.3.2 Definition of layover ..................................................................................................................... 34 2.3.3 Minimum layover time at bus terminus ....................................................................................... 35 2.4 Calculation of factors for adjustment of costs related to timetable hours ......................................... 35 2.4.1 Changes in layover time (CF1) ................................................................................................... 35 2.4.2 Changes to day-time and night-time distribution (CF2) .............................................................. 36 2.4.3 Adjustment of costs related to timetable hours ........................................................................... 37 2.4.4 Illustration of principles................................................................................................................ 37 2.5 Dead mileage .................................................................................................................................... 38 2.6 Tender units ....................................................................................................................................... 40 2.6.1 Tender unit 1. Vehicle schedules 0465 and 0466 ....................................................................... 40 2.6.2 Tender unit 2. Vehicle schedules 0219 and 0233 ....................................................................... 42 2.6.3 Tender unit 3. Vehicle schedules 0190 and 0194 ....................................................................... 46 2.6.4 Tender unit 4. Vehicle schedules 0333, 0334, 0335, 0336, 0385 .............................................. 49 3. Bus equipment ...................................................................................................................................... 53 3.1 In general ........................................................................................................................................... 53 3.2 Buses brought into service ................................................................................................................ 53 3.2.1 Temporary bus equipment .......................................................................................................... 54 3.3 Fitting out, safety, etc. ....................................................................................................................... 55 3.3.1 Regulatory requirements ............................................................................................................. 55 3.3.2 Length ......................................................................................................................................... 55 3.3.3 Bus type ...................................................................................................................................... 55 3.3.4 Doors ........................................................................................................................................... 55 3.3.5 Boarding and alighting ................................................................................................................ 56 3.3.6 Seating and standing capacity .................................................................................................... 57 3.3.7 Seats ........................................................................................................................................... 57 3.3.8 Flexi area: Wheelchair, pram and bicycle area ........................................................................... 58 3.3.9 Gangway and floor areas ............................................................................................................ 58 3.3.10 Hand rails and bus stop buttons ............................................................................................... 59 3.3.11 Indoor climate and window panes ............................................................................................. 60 3.3.12 Interior lighting ........................................................................................................................... 61 3.3.13 Video surveillance system......................................................................................................... 61 3.3.14 Fitting out the driver's seating area ..........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • People to Walk More
    MORE PEOPLE TO WALK MORE The Pedestrian strategy of Copenhagen 2 More People to Walk More... ... it’s healthy ... you protect the environment ... you contribute to a living city ... you get new ideas ... you discover more ... you meet other people ... it’s free 3 PREFACE We are all pedestrians – every day. Sometimes we’re just out for a walk, other times we have a specific goal in mind. Even when we take our bike or car, go by bus, train or metro the trip usually starts and ends on foot. Most of us can walk in the city with no problems, whereas some of us need a bit of help on our walk. If you use a walking stick, a walker, a wheelchair or something similar, then you’re particularly dependent on the pavements, roads and so on being easy to access. This, however, does not change the fact that we are all pedestrians. In Copenhagen, we are very keen to focus on pedestrians so we can achieve an even better city life for everybody even more healthy citizens and a better environment. It is essential for us to create an even more interesting, exciting and safe city. For this reason, I would like to introduce here one of the goals in the City of Copenha- gen’s proposal for city life entitled “Metropolis for People”: ”More People to Walk More”. The pedestrian strategy “ More People to Walk More” contains a number of proposals as to how Copenhagen can become an even better city for pedestrians, showing how to achieve the goal of 20 % more pedestrians by 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Subsidy Reform Consultation Response Form
    Bus Subsidy Reform Consultation Response Form Part 1 - Information about you Name Jonathan Bray Address 40-50 Wellington Street, Leeds Postcode LS1 2DE email [email protected] Company Name Passenger Transport Executive Group (pteg) or Organisation (if applicable) Please tick one box from the list below that best describes you /your company or organisation. Small to Medium bus operator (up to 50 employees) Large bus operator Representative Organisation Trade Union Interest Group Local Government Central Government Member of the public Other (please describe): If you are responding on behalf of an organisation or interest group how many members do you have and how did you obtain the views of your members: We consulted them extensively and got sign off of the final draft. If you would like your response or personal details to be treated confidentially please explain why: PART 2 - Your comments 1. Do you agree with how we propose to YES NO calculate the amounts to be devolved? If not, what alternative arrangements would you suggest should be used? Please explain your reasons and add any additional comments you wish to make : We support the general principle that the initial amount devolved should be the amount paid to operators in the current financial year for supported services operating within the relevant Local Transport Authority area. However: • We believe that all funded services need to be brought into the calculation, not just those that have been procured by tender. A consistent approach needs to be taken to services which operate on a part- commercial/part-supported basis, including where individual journeys are supported in part, for example through a de-minimis payment to cover a diversion of an otherwise commercial journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Blad Efteraar.Indd
    Turcyklisten 3 2015 www.turcyklisterne.dk Turcyklisten 2015/ 3 1 Bladet Turcyklisten - er medlemsblad for foreningen Redaktør Turcyklisterne, der har til formål at Lone Belhage udbrede og formidle viden om og glæde [email protected] ved turcykkling på ethvert plan. Udkommer 4 gang årligt. Koordinator Finn A. Kristensen Klubben er åben for alle som deler tlf: 22 16 27 30 glæden ved at cykle. Så har vi vakt din interesse er du velkommen til at kikke Bestyrelse forbi på en klubaften eller at møde op til en af de annoncerede ture for at se hvad vi egentlig er for nogle. Se i øvrigt også: Formand Knud Hofgart WWW.TURCYKLISTERNE.DK tlf. 28 40 65 42 [email protected] Klublokale Sankt Annæ Gymnasium Kasserer Sjælør Boulevard 135 Flemming Nielsen Valby tlf. 43 64 49 03 Lokale B210 2sal Flemming.K.R.Nielsen@ mail.dk Kontigent 2015 Almindeligt kontigent: 275.- Husstands kontigent: 450.- Øvrige bestyrelsesmedlemmer Passivt kontigent: 100.- Aksel Koplev Indbetaling kan ske på giro: 5 713 846, tlf. 22 80 25 22 vælg korttype 01. [email protected] Eller via netbank, brug reg.nr: 1551 konto 5 713 846. Hjælp med at holde Lone Belhage medlemslisten aktuel. tlf. 24 80 46 87 Send ændringerne i adresse, tlf.nr, eller Erik Carlsen e-mail til kasseren. 41 23 35 07 Birgit Rudolf 1. suppleant 26 27 44 19 Bert Due Jensen 2. suppleant 26 67 63 35 2 Turcyklisten 2015 / 3 Turcyklisten 2015/ 3 Strøtanker om en træerne og høre fuglesangen, mens nogle af os pustede ud. Undervejs i tur for cyklister Santa Maria indtog vi kaffe eller øl.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastrukturforbedringer På S-Banen - Tog Til Tiden
    Infrastrukturforbedringer på S-banen - tog til tiden Anders H. Kaas, [email protected] Atkins Danmark A/S Niels Wellendorf, [email protected] DSB S-tog 1. Indledning DSB S-tog har i de sidste mange år arbejdet hen imod, at indføre en ny køreplan med fuld ud- nyttelse af de nye S-tog, der nu er leveret til erstatning for de gamle tog fra 70’erne. For at kunne udnytte togenes højere hastighed og bedre acceleration og deceleration er store dele af infrastrukturen nu tilpasset og forbedret, bl.a. med højere hastighed på mange stræk- ninger. Hertil har Banedanmark anvendt omkring 1 mia. kr. over de sidste mange år. Hertil kommer en række yderligere projekter Banedanmark nu har igangsat for at sikre en for- nuftig regularitet for den nye køreplan, herunder en optimering af togfølgen i ”Røret”. Med den nye køreplan, der træder i kraft i august 2007 – når Banedanmark er helt klar med infrastrukturen, herunder den nye DIC-S – står DSB S-tog godt rustet til de kommende års drift. Figur 1: Linjekort, ny S-togskøreplan august 2007 Trafikdage på Aalborg Universitet 2006 1 Der er dog også behov for i de kommende år at udvide og udvikle driftstilbudet, herunder ger- ne med en ekstra linje. 2. Dagens driftssituation Det er ikke alene nye S-tog og dertil opgraderet infrastruktur, der gør det. Togene skal gerne køre til tiden hver dag, hvilket kræver at alle dele af infrastrukturen er gearet til at kunne klare de forsinkelser der af forskellige årsager altid vil opstå. Altså at infrastrukturen er indrettet på at kunne få togene frem til tiden, eller om nødvendigt at kunne sikre en hurtig genopretning af trafikken.
    [Show full text]
  • The Train Driver Recovery Problem – a Set Partitioning Based Model and Solution Method
    The Train Driver Recovery Problem – a Set Partitioning Based Model and Solution Method Natalia J. Rezanova Informatics and Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark Richard Petersens Plads 1, Building 305, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark e-mail: [email protected] David M. Ryan The Department of Engineering Science, Faculty of Engineering The University of Auckland Private Bag 92019, Auckland Mail Centre, Auckland 1142, New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] IMM-TECHNICAL REPORT-2006-24 Abstract The need to recover a train driver schedule occurs during major disruptions in the daily railway operations. Using data from the train driver schedule of the Dan- ish passenger railway operator DSB S-tog A/S, a solution method to the Train Driver Recovery Problem (TDRP) is developed. The TDRP is formulated as a set partitioning problem. The LP relaxation of the set partitioning formulation of the TDRP possesses strong integer properties. The proposed model is there- fore solved via the LP relaxation and Branch & Price. Starting with a small set of drivers and train tasks assigned to the drivers within a certain time period, the LP relaxation of the set partitioning model is solved with column generation. If a feasible solution is not found, further drivers are gradually added to the prob- lem or the optimization time period is increased. Fractions are resolved with a constraint branching strategy using the depth-first search of the Branch & Bound tree. Preliminarily results are encouraging, showing that nearly all tested real-life instances produce integer solutions to the LP relaxation and solutions are found within a few seconds.
    [Show full text]
  • Dead Mileage and Contract Study
    Board 19.5.09 Secretariat Memorandum Agenda Item 8 b) LTW 307 Author: Tim Bellenger ‘Dead mileage’ and contracting arrangements for the London bus network. 1 Purpose of report 1.1. To report to members the conclusions of the report commissioned by London TravelWatch from JMP consultants on the potential for running ‘dead’ or out of service mileage in passenger service and inform London TravelWatch’s response to the review by Transport for London (TfL) of its procurement and operating practices in relation to the bus network. 2 Recommendations 2.1. Members are recommended to accept the consultants recommendations in relation to ‘out of service’ mileage that a ‘Value for Money’ test should be adopted by TfL when implementing bus contracts in order to secure additional passenger benefits. 2.2. Members are recommended to accept the consultants’ recommendation that in relation to bus contract procurement and operating practices that:- 2.2.1. The use of net cost tendering is not suited to the intensive nature of the London bus network, because of the difficulties in making accurate revenue projections on a route by route basis, and that there is no clear passenger benefit from reintroducing this method of tendering. 2.2.2. TfL should continue to encourage smaller operators to enter the contracted bus market in London, particularly on low frequency local routes where a smaller operator may be able to give added value in terms of personal service to the passenger. 2.2.3. The quality of ‘back office’ systems such as iBus, bus lane enforcement cameras, ticketing systems and closed circuit television within vehicles has an impact on passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • Regionplan 2005 Regionplan
    Regionplan 2005 Hovedstadens Udviklingsråd Gammel Køge Landevej 3 2500 Valby Telefon 36 13 14 00 www.hur.dk Som konsekvens af kommunalreformen nedlægges Hovedstadens Udviklingsråd pr. 31. december 2006. Regionplanopgaverne fordeles herefter mellem stat og kommuner bortset fra råstofplanlægning og deponering af forurenet jord, der overføres til de nye regioner. Regionplan 2005 for Hovedstadsregionen Visioner og hovedstruktur Retningslinjer og redegørelse Regionplan 2005 Visioner og hovedstruktur For Hovedstadsregionen Retningslinjer og redegørelse Redaktion og Hovedstadens Udviklingsråd grafi sk tilrettelæggelse Plandivisionen Omslag IdentityPeople | PeopleGroup Udgivet December 2005 af Hovedstadens Udviklingsråd Gammel Køge Landevej 3 2500 Valby Telefon 36 13 14 00 e-mail [email protected] Trykt hos Fihl-Jensen Grafi sk Produktion Oplag 2.500 Pris 100 kr. Kort Gengivet med Kort- og Matrikelstyrelsens tilladelse G13-00 Copyright ISBN nr. 87-7971-182-0 Forord Regionplan 2005 for Hovedstadsregionen Visioner og hovedstruktur Retningslinjer og redegørelse Visioner og hovedstruktur Forslag til Regionplan 2005 1 Udviklingsrådets medlemmer Carl Christian Ebbesen (O), Københavns Kommune Sven Milthers (F), Københavns Kommune 1. næstformand, Amtsborgmester Vibeke Storm Rasmussen (A), Københavns Amt Mogens Andersen (A), Roskilde Amt Formand, Borgmester Mads Lebech (C), Frederiksberg Kommune Lars Abel (C), Københavns Amt 2. næstformand, Amtsborgmester Kristian Ebbensgaard (V), Roskilde Amt Conny Dideriksen (A), Frederiksborg Amt Bent Larsen (V), Københavns Amt Jørgen Christensen (V), Frederiksborg Amt Lars Engberg (A), Københavns Kommune 2 Forslag til Regionplan 2005 Visioner og hovedstruktur Forord Med lidt god vilje kan man kalde vedtagelsen af Regionplan 2005 for historisk, fordi HUR her lægger den sidste regionplan frem med fokus på Danmarks eneste metropolregion. Planen udstikker rammerne for de kommende års fysiske planlægning i Hoved- stadsregionen og vil være grundlaget for de kommende års planarbejde efter overgangen til den nye kommunale struktur.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Committee
    Transport Committee Value added? The Transport Committee’s assessment of whether the bus contracts issued by London Buses represent value for money March 2006 The Transport Committee Roger Evans - Chairman (Conservative) Geoff Pope - Deputy Chair (Liberal Democrat) John Biggs - Labour Angie Bray - Conservative Elizabeth Howlett - Conservative Peter Hulme Cross - One London Darren Johnson - Green Murad Qureshi - Labour Graham Tope - Liberal Democrat The Transport Committee’s general terms of reference are to examine and report on transport matters of importance to Greater London and the transport strategies, policies and actions of the Mayor, Transport for London, and the other Functional Bodies where appropriate. In particular, the Transport Committee is also required to examine and report to the Assembly from time to time on the Mayor’s Transport Strategy, in particular its implementation and revision. The terms of reference as agreed by the Transport Committee on 20th October 2005 for the bus contracts scrutiny were: • To examine the value for money secured by the Quality Incentive Contracts issued by London Buses to bus operators. This will include o An examination of the penalty/bonus element to the Quality Incentive Contracts o An examination of operator rate of return and operator market share o An examination of the criteria by which the subsidy’s value for money is judged • To compare all of the above with other contracting arrangements within the UK and other international major cities Please contact Danny Myers on either 020 7983 4394 or on e-mail via [email protected] if you have any comments on this report the Committee would welcome any feedback.
    [Show full text]
  • Forslag Til Trafikerings- Og Infrastrukturplan for Jernbanen 2030
    Marts 2021 Forslag til Trafikerings- og infrastrukturplan for jernbanen 2030 2021, Det europæiske år for jernbanetransport 1 Indhold 1. Forslag til trafikerings- og infrastrukturplan for jernbanen 2030 ................................... 4 1.1 Jernbanen som Danmarks grønne puls .................................................................... 5 1.2. Jernbanens fordele ............................................................................................... 5 1.3. Ny organisering og planlægning af den kollektive trafik ............................................ 8 2. Trafikeringsplan for jernbanen .................................................................................. 9 2.1. Fjerntrafik og international trafik ......................................................................... 11 2.1.1. Indenlandsk fjerntrafik .................................................................................... 11 2.1.2. Internationale tog ........................................................................................... 11 2.2. Den regionale og lokale trafik .............................................................................. 12 2.2.1. Sjælland og omkringliggende øer ...................................................................... 12 2.2.2. Fyn, højere frekvens på de regionale linjer, en fynsk regional S-bane .................... 13 2.2.3. Nordjylland .................................................................................................... 13 2.2.4. Østjylland, en østjysk regional S-bane ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Furesø Kommuneplan 2013
    Furesø Kommuneplan 2013 Rammer for lokalplanlægningen Bydele oversigt Indholdsfortegnelse - Rammer for lokalplanlægningen 1. Hæfte 1. Hovedstruktur 2. Hæfte 2. Rammer for lokalplanlægningen 3. Oversigtskort 1:20.000 Indledning . 7 1C2, Farum Hovedgade 24-40 og 17-31 m .fl . 25 Generelle rammer for 1C3, Boliger ved Nordtoftevej / Farum Hovedgade . 26 lokalplanlægning for alle områder . 9 1C4, Område ved Gammelgårdsvej . 26 Generelle rammer for boligområder . 11 1C5, Farum Hovedgade 42-52 og 33-39 . 27 Generelle rammer for centerområder . 12 1C6, Farum Hovedgade 54-86 og 41-77 . 27 Generelle rammer for områder til offentlige formål . 13 1C7, Akacietorvet . 28 Generelle rammer for erhvervsområder . 13 1C8, Farum Hovedgade 94-120 og 89-131 m .fl . .. 28 Generelle rammer for fritidsområder . 13 1D1, Gedevasevang . 29 Generelle rammer for natur- og landbrugsområder . 14 1D3, Vandværk . 29 Forklarende noter . 14 1F1, Farumgård Skov . 29 1F4, Farum Park, svømmehal, skole mv . 30 1 Farum Vest .................................... 17 1L1, Skovområde ved Farum Sø . 30 1B1, Lindegårds- og Gedevasekvarteret . 18 1L2, Farumgård mv . 30 1B2, Lillevangskvarteret . 18 1B3, Ryttergården . 18 2 Farum Midt .................................... 31 1B4, Boligområde i Vestbyen . 19 2B1, Fensmarkskvarteret mv . 32 1B5, Nygårdsvej og Nordvænget . 19 2B2, Lejerbo - Frederiksborgvej . .. 32 1B6, Området omkring Stationsvej . 19 2B4, Nordvænget II m .fl . 32 1B7, Område ved Skovvængets Allé . 20 2B5, Farum Midtpunkt . 33 1B8, Farum Landsby . 20 2B6, Område ved Farum station . 33 1B9, Solvang . 21 2B7, Elmely og Byparken . 34 1B10, Nordvænget I . .. 21 2B8, Boliger Rugmarken . 34 1B11, Æblelunden . .. 21 2C1, Farum Bytorv . 35 1B12, Akaciepark . 22 2C2, Erhvervs- og boligområde ved Frederiksborgvej 35 1B13, Sejlgårdspark .
    [Show full text]
  • Møde I Udvalg for Natur, Miljø Og Grøn Omstilling
    Møde i Udvalg for natur, miljø og grøn omstilling Åben Referat Dato: Torsdag den 7. november 2019 Tidspunkt: 16:00 Sted: Rådhuset Mødelokale 21 Furesø Kommune Møde i Udvalg for natur, miljø og grøn omstilling / 07-11-2019 Sagsoversigt: 1. Beslutning: Det videre arbejde med strukturanalyse for renseanlæg, Roskilde Fjord ...........................................................................................................2 2. Beslutning: Hovedindhold i ny spildevandsplan ..................................................4 3. Beslutning: Budgetopfølgning III 2019 - UNMG .................................................6 4. Beslutning: Indledning af proces om ophør af iltning af Furesø ..........................11 5. Beslutning: Regulativ for standsning og parkering i Furesø Kommune .................13 6. Beslutning: Godkendelse af vejprojekt og vejudlæg for vejadgang til Hangar 1 ....15 7. Beslutning: Fremtidig administration af den privat fællesvej Gydebakken beliggende i landzone ..................................................................................17 8. Beslutning: Farumgård fredning ....................................................................19 9. Beslutning: Etablering af Skovbørnehave i Jægerhytten ....................................21 10. Beslutning: Nye boformer på Tibbevangen 86 .................................................23 11. Beslutning: Mødekalender 2020 og 2021 ........................................................26 12. Orientering: Status på vejrenovering 2018-2019 .............................................27
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Bus Statistics: 2010/11
    Annual Bus Statistics: 2010/11 Notes and Definitions This document provides information about DfT These Notes and Definitions include: bus statistics. 1. Introduction to the statistics Bus statistics are published annually by the 2. Information on data sources and methods Department for Transport, and include figures 3. Information relating to the published tables relating to bus passenger journeys, vehicle miles including key definitions travelled, revenue and costs, fare levels, 4. Sources of further information related to but Government support, vehicles owned by PSV not covered by these statistics operators and number of staff employed. In 5. Background and contextual information addition to the annual publication, estimates of patronage are available on a quarterly basis. Section 1 presents a brief overview of the statistics, covering the following questions: What do these statistics cover? Why are the statistics collected and how are they used? What are the sources of data used to compile the statistics? What methods are used to compile the published information? How reliable are the statistics? What should be considered when using them? How often are these statistics updated? What other information is available on buses and bus travel? Section 2 provides further general information about the main data sources used to compile the statistics, including the methods used to produce figures for publication and data quality issues. Section 3 presents information relevant to specific aspects of the published figures, including definitions of key terms and specific issues relevant to the interpretation of individual tables or sections. Section 4 provides details of further sources of statistics on buses and bus travel which are not covered by these statistics Section 5 provides links to relevant contextual information about the bus industry and bus policy The annexes contain more detailed information as referenced in the appropriate section above.
    [Show full text]