DOCSLIB.ORG

"Gothic" Construction in Ancient Greece Author(S): Jacques Heyman Reviewed Work(S): Source: Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Vol

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
"Gothic" Construction in Ancient Greece Author(s): Jacques Heyman Reviewed work(s): Source: Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Vol. 31, No. 1 (Mar., 1972), pp. 3-9 Published by: University of California Press on behalf of the Society of Architectural Historians Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/988722 . Accessed: 30/01/2012 03:56 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of California Press and Society of Architectural Historians are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. http://www.jstor.org "Gothic" Construction in Ancient Greece JACQUES HEYMAN University of Cambridge THE FACT THAT ancientGreek and Gothicarchitecture are,visually, so obviouslydistinct leads to the ideathat the masonrystructure behaves in differentways in the two styles.However, an examinationof the mechanicsof ma- sonryconstruction does not supportthis assumption. This is not to imply thatancient Greek and Gothicarchitects had thesame view of theirbuildings; indeed, neither is likelyto havethought of structurein a way thata modernstructural engineerwould considerrelevant. Ruskinobserved "that the principal distinctions between existingstyles of architecturedepend on theirmethods of roofingany space,as a window or door for instance... ; thatis to say, that the characterof Greekarchitecture ... dependson its roofinga spacewith a singlestone laid from Fig. I. Stone lintel (from Ruskin). side to side ... ; and the characterof Gothicarchitecture dependson its roofingspaces with pointedarches ."* Thetype of "Greek"lintel Ruskin had in mindis illustrated... by his own sketch(Fig. I). Ruskinseems to makea in Although comparison purely Fig. 2. A brick plate-bande(from visualterms between Greek and Gothic,it is cleara little Ruskin). laterthat he is thinkingalso of the structuralfunctions of thetwo Otherwriters make a more "transla- styles. explicit contrast,of course,a Gothicarch thrusts aswell as fromvisual to structural for sideways tion" interpretation; example, down. Fletcherdefines and Gothic HenriFocillon writes that (Banister Romanesque "theGreeks opposed the action as arcuated traceable to the of in styles, finally Etruscans.) gravity thevertical direction only."2 Banister Fletcher Ruskininsists that: givesa full statementof structuralfunction when he writes that"Greek architecture was columnarand tra- theGreek system, considered merely as a pieceof construction,is essentially weakand with beated a Thusthe massivestone lintels barbarous,compared thetwo others[Roman and (trabs= beam)."3 of, Forinstance, in thecase of a windowor door, such for a Greek are to act as beams Gothic]. large example, temple supposed asfig. I, if youhave at your disposal a single large and long stone betweenadjacent columns, and to transmitpurely vertical you mayindeed roof it in theGreek manner, as you have done loadsto thosecolumns and thenceto the foundations.By here,with comparative security; but it is alwaysexpensive to ob- tainand to raiseto theirplace stones of thislarge size, and in many J. Ruskin,Lectures on Architectureand Deliveredat Edin- placesnearly impossible to obtainthem at all: and if youhave not I. Painting such andstill insist the in the Greek burghin November1853 (London, 1907), p. II. stones, uponroofing space 2. H. Focillon, The Art of the West,2 vols. (London, 1963), I, 67. way,that is to say,upon having a squarewindow, you must do it 3. SirBanister Fletcher, A Historyof Architectureon the ComparatiPe bythe miserably feeble adjustment of bricks ... [Fig.2]; you can- Method,17th ed. (London, 1961), p. 93. notbut see in a momentthat this cross bar is weakand imperfect. 3 4 Thus Ruskin is making structural as well as aesthetic judgments, although his statementthat the Greek system is weak and the plate-bandemiserably feeble is, in fact, mere assertion. The square form offends Ruskin's eye and the form that of a it. pointed (as, explicitly, leaf) delights Fig. 3. Iron "reinforcement"of Viollet le Duc expressesvery similar structuralviews in architraveof Propylaea, Athens his dictionary; he devotes half a page to the plate-bande, (after Dinsmoor, "Structural Iron..."). twice calling it an "appareilvicieux."4 This, however, is by contrastwith the Greeklintel: "LesGrecs n'admettaient pas l'arc, et s'ils avaient"i franchir un espace entre deux piliers, deux pieds-droits ou deux colonnes, ils posaient sur les points d'appuiverticaux un monolithe horizontal."Viollet le Duc is particularlyupset by the dishonesty of the late eighteenth- and nineteenth-centurypractice of concealing iron barswithin the masonry to form the true and effective structure (e.g., the Madeleine, the Panth6on): "Les archi- tectes du moyen age, on le comprend, ne pouvaient s'as- treindre"a mentir de cette sorte aux principesles plus vrais et les plus naturelsde la construction,et c'est pour cela que plusieursles considererentcomme des gens naifs." However, the Greeks did, in fact, themselves use con- cealed iron in their masonry,5 although the use was only occasional.The matterhas given rise to some controversy,6 but it seems fairly clearthat the Greekiron cannot properly be considered as reinforcement in the modern sense. In Fig. 4. Propylaea,Athens, reconstructed (photo: author). some instances it may have slightly relieved stresses (but does so no longer, since it has long since rustedaway); more This form of construction is as ingenious as it is mis- usually it served some sort of simplifying constructional directed. Although the stressesresulting from the bending function, from a of simple keying together masonry (the moment would be reduced, tensile stresseswould still be Theban treasury,Delphi) to a kind of permanentfalsework present,and stone is a materialweak in tension. In the pres- (as at the Temple of Zeus, Agrigento; see below). ent state of the Propylaea (Fig. 4) it will be seen that, de- The Propylaea at Athens (Mnesicles,437 B.C.)is one of spite the precautions, at least two of the architravesare the buildings which originally had concealed iron. Each broken right through at their centers of span. To be sure, architraveis composed of two marble beams 5o cm thick this fracturemay have occurredas a result of the iron rust- and 8o cm high, spanning typically about 3.6 m between ing away, with the load of the marble ceiling beams thus the centers of supporting columns; the clear span between being imposed directly on the architraves.The history of abaci is, of course, less than 3.6 m. These twin architraves the fracturesis, however, unimportant;and, as will be seen, were channelled out on their top faces, and an iron bar, the fracturesthemselves are not of structuralimportance. about m and of section about 75 mm X mm 1.6 long IIS Ruskin notes a similar fracture in Edinburgh, and de- was apparentlyinserted to spreadthe load (Fig. 3). Suppos- scribes "the great church with the dome, at the end of ing the structuralaction of the architraveto be that of a George Street," whose "huge horizontal lintel above the beam in bending, then the introduction of the iron bars door is alreadysplit right through." It might be naturalto would reduce the value of the maximum bending moment suppose that such splits are a sign of danger, or to believe in the marble beams to one-half. something approaching with Pol Abraham that cracks are "signes avant-coureurs in 4. E. E. Viollet le Duc, Dictionnaireraisonne' de l'architecturefranfaise de la ruine,"7but these beliefs are not supported any way du XIe au XVIe siecle,Io vols. (Paris,1858-1868), vrI, 207. by modern structuralanalysis. Indeed, I have recently ar- 5. W. B. Dinsmoor, "StructuralIron in Greek Architecture," gued "that the crackedstate is the naturalstate of masonry, AmericanJournalof Archaeology (2nd ser.), xxvI (1922), 148. 6. R. A. Jewett, "StructuralAntecedents of the I-beam, I8oo- 185o," Technologyand Culture, vim (1967), 346. For a discussionby H. Dorn, see Technologyand Culture, Ix (1968),415, with a response 7. Pol Abraham, Violletle Duc et le rationalismemedieval (Paris, by Jewett, 419, and rejoinderfrom Dorn, 427. 1934), p. 8. :5 Fig. 6. Collapsemechanism for voussoirarch. Fig. 7. Stableposition for an imperfectlyfitted plate-bande. Fig. 5. Temple of Zeus, Athens (photo: author). forcesbetween two adjacentportions of masonryare so althoughthe cracksmay be so smallas to be invisible,or be high thatthere is no dangerof slidingfailure; this assump- closedby the elasticityof the stone."' tion will usuallybe satisfied,although it is possibleto find A very visiblefracture is shown in Figure5, wherethe practicalcounterexamples. Further, stresses in masonry architravehas sagged slightly to reveala wedge-shaped constructionare usually so smallthat there is no dangerof crackat the centerof span (Templeof Zeus, Athens,174 crushingof the material. B.C.and later). There is no questionof thisstone architrave Certaintheorems of structuralbehavior can be proved actingin any senseas a lintelbeam. The mode of actionis within the frameworkof theseassumptions. For example, clear;the two halvesof
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Entablature Refers to the System of Moldings and Bands Which Lie Horizontally Above Columns, Resting on Their Capitals
    An entablature refers to the system of moldings and bands which lie horizontally above columns, resting on their capitals. Considered to be major elements of classical architecture, entablatures are commonly divided into three parts: the architrave, frieze, and cornice. E ntablature by stromberg ARCHITRAVE The architrave is the supporting element, and the lowest of the three main parts of an entablature: the undecorated lintel resting on the columns. FRIEZE The frieze is the plain or decorated horizontal unmolded strip located between the cornice and the architrave. Clay Academy, Dallas, TX Stromberg offers you the freedom to choose. Whether your project requires authentic classical entablature, or a modern look, we will design your entablature to perfectly match your building’s unique style . We have extensive knowledge of all the major classical orders, including Ionic, Doric, and Corinthian, and we can craft columns and entablatures that comply with each order’s specifications. DORIC a continuous sculpted frieze and a The oldest and simplest of these three cornice. CORNICE orders of classical Greek architecture, Its delicate beauty and rich ornamentation typified by heavy, fluted columns with contrast with the stark unembellished The cornice is the upper plain capitals and no base. features of the Doric order. part of an entablature; a decorative molded IONIC CORINTHIAN projection at the top of a This order, considered to be a feminine The most ornate of the three classical wall or window. style, is distinguished by tall slim orders, characterized by a slender fluted columns with flutes resting on molded column having an ornate, bell-shaped bases and crowned by capitals in the capital decorated with acanthus leaves.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gibbs Range of Classical Porches • the Gibbs Range of Classical Porches •
    THE GIBBS RANGE OF CLASSICAL PORCHES • THE GIBBS RANGE OF CLASSICAL PORCHES • Andrew Smith – Senior Buyer C G Fry & Son Ltd. HADDONSTONE is a well-known reputable company and C G Fry & Son, award- winning house builder, has used their cast stone architectural detailing at a number of our South West developments over the last ten years. We erected the GIBBS Classical Porch at Tregunnel Hill in Newquay and use HADDONSTONE because of the consistency, product, price and service. Calder Loth, Senior Architectural Historian, Virginia Department of Historic Resources, USA As an advocate of architectural literacy, it is gratifying to have Haddonstone’s informative brochure defining the basic components of literate classical porches. Hugh Petter’s cogent illustrations and analysis of the porches’ proportional systems make a complex subject easily grasped. A porch celebrates an entrance; it should be well mannered. James Gibbs’s versions of the classical orders are the appropriate choice. They are subtlety beautiful, quintessentially English, and fitting for America. Jeremy Musson, English author, editor and presenter Haddonstone’s new Gibbs range is the result of an imaginative collaboration with architect Hugh Petter and draws on the elegant models provided by James Gibbs, one of the most enterprising design heroes of the Georgian age. The result is a series of Doric and Ionic porches with a subtle variety of treatments which can be carefully adapted to bring elegance and dignity to houses old and new. www.haddonstone.com www.adamarchitecture.com 2 • THE GIBBS RANGE OF CLASSICAL PORCHES • Introduction The GIBBS Range of Classical Porches is designed The GIBBS Range is conceived around the two by Hugh Petter, Director of ADAM Architecture oldest and most widely used Orders - the Doric and and inspired by the Georgian architect James Ionic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Five Orders of Architecture
    BY GìAGOMO F5ARe)ZZji OF 2o ^0 THE FIVE ORDERS OF AECHITECTURE BY GIACOMO BAROZZI OF TIGNOLA TRANSLATED BY TOMMASO JUGLARIS and WARREN LOCKE CorYRIGHT, 1889 GEHY CENTER UK^^i Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/fiveordersofarchOOvign A SKETCH OF THE LIFE OF GIACOMO BAEOZZI OF TIGNOLA. Giacomo Barozzi was born on the 1st of October, 1507, in Vignola, near Modena, Italy. He was orphaned at an early age. His mother's family, seeing his talents, sent him to an art school in Bologna, where he distinguished himself in drawing and by the invention of a method of perspective. To perfect himself in his art he went to Eome, studying and measuring all the ancient monuments there. For this achievement he received the honors of the Academy of Architecture in Eome, then under the direction of Marcello Cervini, afterward Pope. In 1537 he went to France with Abbé Primaticcio, who was in the service of Francis I. Barozzi was presented to this magnificent monarch and received a commission to build a palace, which, however, on account of war, was not built. At this time he de- signed the plan and perspective of Fontainebleau castle, a room of which was decorated by Primaticcio. He also reproduced in metal, with his own hands, several antique statues. Called back to Bologna by Count Pepoli, president of St. Petronio, he was given charge of the construction of that cathedral until 1550. During this time he designed many GIACOMO BAROZZr OF VIGNOLA. 3 other buildings, among which we name the palace of Count Isolani in Minerbio, the porch and front of the custom house, and the completion of the locks of the canal to Bologna.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diminution of the Classical Column: Visual Sensibility In
    David A. Vila The Diminution of the Classical Column: Domini Visual Sensibility in Antiquity and the Renaissance David Vila Domini looks at the recommendations regarding optical adjustment of the columnar diminution in the architectural treatises of Vitruvius, Alberti, and Palladio. He examines the variation in diminution of column thickness according to the height of the column, and its implications for our understanding of the various practices with regard both to columnar proportion and visual sensibility in Antiquity and the Renaissance. He also examines possible sources for the methods by which the ratios of column height to diameter were derived. Introduction 1 Writing some time around the 1450s [Grayson 1960], Alberti composed his ten-book treatise on architecture De re aedificatoria, basing it largely on the ancient Roman tract De architectura [Krautheimer 1963], which its author, Vitruvius, dedicated to the emperor Augustus. Alberti and his contemporaries found Vitruvius’s text inelegantly written, often obscure and in some passages entirely unintelligible.2 The widespread use of Greek terms for things that were otherwise nameless in Augustan Latin confounded the efforts of the humanists trying to make sense of the only text on architecture that had survived from the antiquity they had so much come to admire. In his attempt to remedy these linguistic problems, Alberti was forced to introduce neologisms in order to express ideas for which, until then, there were no words in Latin.3 But the difficulties were by no means exclusively linguistic, and constitute an indication of the very different understanding that Roman Antiquity and the Early Renaissance had of architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Hellenistic Architecture in Syria
    Hellenistic Architecture in Syria A D ISS ERTATIO N PRESENTED TO THE F ACULTY O F PRINCETON UNIVERSITY IN CANDIDACY F O R TH E DEGREE O F Docron O F PH ILOSOPHY BY R fiRRAY R. 5 . BUTLE , J PRINCETO N UNIVERSITY PRESS PRIN CETO N LON D ON : HUMPHRE Y MILF ORD OXF ORD U NIVE RS ITY PRES S 1917 1 09 09 05 PREF ACE The purpose o f this thesis is to show tha t the architecture of S en h D yria up to the d of t e third century A . was Hellenistic. n In general only dated monuments have bee considered, or e c those whose p riod an be determined with certainty. With these restrictions , all the monuments of Northern Central Syria and D ran a f m of the j ebel Hau , showing det ils o any i po rtance, en Baalbec a have be considered. , as being in process of public i ha s een e c a t on, b omitted exc pt for oc asion l reference . South of the Ha uran only the ruins a t Arak il - Emir ha ve been ih o D r or ren cluded, with those f je ash and Amma n f refe ce . men 1 m Monu ts published by Mr. H . C. Butler since April, 9 , c are not in luded . In the spelling of names the system has been followed that r n a a is employed by D . E no Littm nn in the public tions of the America n Archaeological Expedition to Syr ia in 1 899- 1 900 t n c e n wi hout the use of diacritical sig s .
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture Vocabulary
    Art & Architecture Student Handout Architecture Vocabulary Arcade: a succession of arches supported on columns. An arcade can be free-standing covered passage or attached to a wall, as seen on the right. Arch: the curved support of a building or doorway. The tops of the arches can be curved, semicircular, pointed, etc. Architrave: the lowest part of the entablature that sits directly on the capitals (tops) of the columns. Capital: the top portion of a column. In classical architecture, the architectural order is usually identified by design of the capital (Doric, Ionic, or Corinthian). Classical: of or pertaining to Classicism. See Classicism. Classicism: a preference or regard for the principles of Greek and Roman art and architecture. Common classicizing architecture is a sense of balance, proportion, and “ideal” beauty. Column: an upright post, usually square, round, or rectangular (an example can be seen on the left). It can be used as a support or attached to a wall for decoration. In classical architecture, columns are composed of a capital, shaft, and a base (except in the Doric order). Cornice: the rectangular band above the frieze, below the pediment. Dome: a half-sphere curvature constructed on a circular base, as seen on the right. Entablature: the upper portion of an order, it includes the architrave, frieze and cornice. Frieze: the wide rectangular section on the entablature, above the architrave and below the cornice. In the Doric order, the frieze is often decorated with triglyphs (altering tablets of vertical groves) and the plain, rectangular bands spaced between the triglyphs (called metopes). Order: an ancient style of architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Modernity in the Architraves and Ceilings at the Mnesiklean Propylaia Tasos Tanoulas
    e a c er a a e or e Nouvelle histoire de la construction sous la direction de Roberto Gargiani Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes L'auteur et l'editeur remercient l'Ecole polytechnique federale de Lausanne pour le soutien apporte a la publication de cet ouvrage. La collection «Architecture Essais» est dirigee par 1es professeurs Jacques Lucan et Luca Orte11i La colonne Nouvelle histoire de la construction Roberto Gorgioni (sous 10 direction de) Composition, non-composition Architecture et theories, X1X'-XX' siecles Jacques Lucan Histoire de I'architecture moderne Structure et revetement Giovanni Fanelli et Roberto Gargiani Enseignement d'un temple egyptien Conception architectonique du temple d'Athor aDendara Pierre Zignani Graphisme et mise en page: antidote [www.antidote-design.ch). Lausanne Couverture: L. Skid more, N. A. Owings, J. O. Merrill/SOM, Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, Colorado, 1954-1962. Dining hall en construction [photo Stewarts Commercial Photographers. Courtesy Special Collections, Pikes Peak Library District, negative #5-3) Traduction en fran<;ais: Marie-Christine Lehmann [textes de Salvatore Aprea, Maria Chiara Barone, Antonio Becchi, Gianluca Belli, Alberto Bologna, Massimo Bulgarelli, Antonio Burgos Nunez, Vittorio da Caiano, Giulia Chemolli, Giovanni Di Pasquale, Francesco Di Teodoro, Roberto Gargiani, Jean-Pierre Goguet, Albert Guettard, Riccardo Gulli, Tullia lori, Daniel Jeanneret, Louis Jeanneret, Charles Lafaye, Beatrice Lampariello, Antoine de Maillet, Michele Messeri, Emanuela Montelli, Marc Nollet, Pier Nicola Pagliara, Michael Petzet, Mario Piana, Marco Pogacnik, Sergio Poretti, Francesco Quinterio, Bruno Reichlin, Nicola Rizzi, Anna Rosellini, Giampiero Sanguigni, Hermann Schlimme, Philipp Speiser, Claude Tibieres, Valerio Varano, Etienne Vignon et Robin Wimmel). Recueil de textes edites sous la direction du Laboratoire de Theorie et d'Histoire de I'Architecture 3: Roberto Gargiani, Salvatore Aprea, Maria Chiara Barone, Giulia Chemolli, Beatrice Lampariello, Marie-Christine Lehmann, Khue Tran.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Temples of Commodus at Corinth
    TWO TEMPLESOF COMMODUS AT CORINTH The two temples to be discussed here are situated in the middle of the row of foundations across the West Terrace of the lower Corinthian Agora,' and have hitherto been known as Temples H and J (see planA.J.A., XLIII, 1939, p. 256, fig. 1). They were almost completely cleared in the spring of 1935, and are described briefly in the excavation report of that year; 2 the clearing was completed in 1938, and during the same campaign a great number of architectural members belonging to the two structures were brought to light.3 The remains of the two buildings, in situ (Figs. 1, 2, 3),4 consist of the concrete beddings for the walls, and the cores intended to support the heavy floors, both made of rubble-concrete, a few blocks of poros from the foundation courses along the western ends and four blocks along the northern wall of Temple J. The front part of the foundations has been considerably cut up by mediaeval construction, including tombs; and other mediaeval excavations have to some extent mutilated even the rubble- concrete in the other parts of the building. However, this destruction is not serious except in the front, where it is difficult, if not impossible, to determine the original edges of the structures, and hence the total length. But in general the foundation masses cover an area approximately 16.50 m. square. Although there are obviously two buildings represented. the concrete of one is poured against that of the other so tightly that it has been impossible to trace a line of distinction.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture Styles Spotter's Guide
    Architecture Styles Spotter's Guide CLASSICAL TEMPLES TO SOARING SKYSCRAPERS Sarah Cunliffe Jean Loussier EDITORS Sarah Cunliffe, Clare Haworth-Maden, Michael Kerrigan, Donna F. Shelmerdine, Stephen Small, M. Jane Taylor CONTRIBUTORS :::::s§~\I/~~ THUNDER BAY P'R'E'S'S San Diego, CalifC)rnia The Classical Heritage The Classical Heritage THE CLASSICAL STYLE LEVI: The U.S. Capitol Influences from in Washington. DC, Classical features Earlier Civilizations STYLE FILE Roman dome anel arches anel It is hard to believe that such inf1uence has Notable Features: grace}ill Corinthian columns. U been exerted hy a 2,500-year-old civilization Common elements in all was built in 1793 to a by of smal] that were scattered around the Classical styles include symmetry and William Thornton aud subse• the eastern Mediterranean. But when the visual order. as well as quently nwdified by Ncod(cIsicist Greeks the architectural traditions the use of columns that supported lintels, arch• Benjamin Henry Latrobe. of their ancI;stors in the region, as well as their es, and vaults. Persian and neighbors, they laid Where and When: down klll1ldations It)!· \'Vestcrn architecture Mediterranean region; that arc still intact. c. 6th century BC to 3rd century AD. Columns and Lintels In the sixth Be, the ancient Greeks the use of columns and lintels supports bearing the wcight of bor- to create structures of unpar• alleled and power. This Classical style is best symboli/.ed by the ele• gant Doric and Ionic temples of the flfth BELOW: Columns that Be:. T'he pmity and beauty of build• lh] teis were III II() ng ings sucb as the Parthenon and the I the basic components i Erec1ltlwioll on the Acropolis in Athens, olchiteetllre.
    [Show full text]
  • A REVIEW ANALYSIS of ANCIENT GREEK ARCHITECTURE Mir Mohammad Azad1 1Department of Computer Science and Engineering
    International Journal of Civil Engineering, Construction and Estate Management Vol.3, No.2, pp.48-58, June 2015 ___Published by European Centre for Research Training and Development UK (www.eajournals.org) A REVIEW ANALYSIS OF ANCIENT GREEK ARCHITECTURE Mir Mohammad Azad1 1Department of Computer Science and Engineering Abhik Barua2 2Department of Interior Architecture Shrmin Sultana3 3Department of Interior Architecture Shanto-Mariam University of Creative Technology House # 01,Road # 14, Sector # 13, Uttara, Dhaka, Bangladesh ABSTRACT: The architecture of Ancient Greece is the architecture produced by the Greek- speaking people (Hellenic people) whose culture flourished on the Greek mainland and Peloponnesus, the Aegean Islands, and in colonies in Asia Minor and Italy for a period from about 900 BC until the 1st century AD, with the earliest remaining architectural works dating from around 600 BC. Ancient Greek architecture is best known from its temples, many of which are found throughout the region, mostly as ruins but many substantially intact. The second important type of building that survives all over the Hellenic world is the open-air theatre, with the earliest dating from around 350 BC. Other architectural forms that are still in evidence are the processional gateway (propylon), the public square (agora) surrounded by storied colonnade (stoa), the town council building (bouleuterion), the public monument, the monumental tomb (mausoleum) and the stadium. KEYWORDS: Greek architecture, Ancient Greece. INTRODUCTION Ancient Greek architecture is distinguished by its highly formalised characteristics, both of structure and decoration. This is particularly so in the case of temples where each building appears to have been conceived as a sculptural entity within the landscape, most often raised on high ground so that the elegance of its proportions and the effects of light on its surfaces might be viewed from all angles.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Architectural Terms Key Terms Used in Listed Building Records
    Glossary of Architectural Terms key terms used in listed building records Adamesque Following the design principles or details used by the 18th century family of classical architects, William, John, James and Robert Adam. Architrave The lowest of the three main divisions of the classical entablature, varying according to the order employed; moulded surround to an opening or recess. Arris Sharp edge at the meeting of two surfaces. Arts and Crafts Style of design focusing on craftmanship, material quality, use of local material, often reviving vernacular or traditional forms. Ashlar Masonry of large blocks in regular courses worked to even faces and carefully squared edges: the stones themselves are called ashlars and may have a dressed finish. Astragal Wooden glazing bar used to support the glass panes of a window. Balustrade A parapet or stair rail composed of uprights supporting a coping or rail. Band Course Masonry band which encircles a building wholly or in part usually unmoulded. Bargeboard Boards placed at the incline of a gable to hide the ends of the roof timbers, often decoratively treated. Base The lowest moulding of any structure. Batter The inward incline of an external wall surface, usually at the base, the thickness of the wall being progessively diminished. Bay A vertical alignment of key elements in a wall such as doors or windows which may also project or recess. Beton Brut Raw concrete left in its natural state after the formwork has been removed, also known as board-marked concrete. Blocking Course Plain course forming a low parapet above a cornice usually screening a gutter.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Architectural Terms Arch Acurved Structure of Bricks Or Blocks Over an Opening
    Glossary of Architectural Terms Arch Acurved structure of bricks or blocks over an opening. Architrave The lowest part of an entablature. Art Deco An architectural style popular during the 1920s and 1930s, derived from an exhibition of decorative arts in Paris, France in 1925. A simplified form of classical architecture using colourful geometric and naturalistic motifs. Sometimes called Jazz Moderne. Art Nouveau Astyle of decoration featuring curved lines and geometric and floral patterns. The name of a shop in Paris, France, opened in 1885, specializing in household objects. Balustrade Arailing supported by a series of ornamental posts or pillars that form a fence. Bay Window An angular or curved projection of an exterior wall that contains windows. Battleship Linoleum Flooring used between 1850 and 1950. So called because it was the material used for floors on U.S. battleships. Beaux Arts Style (Classicism) Aclassically derived architectural style that flourished between 1885 and 1920. Originated at the Ecole des Beaux – Arts in Paris, France. Emphasizes symmetry. Glossary of Architectural Terms Beveled Glass Glass that is cut with slopped edges. These edges dissect light creating prisms. Capital The decorative feature at the top of a column or pilaster. Classical Revival (Neo-Classical) Architectural style that mimics Greek or Roman styles. Column Round vertical supports for an arch or entablature. Consist of a base, a shaft and a capital. Corinthian Order The most elaborate of the three Greek orders (Doric, Ionic, Corinthian). Usually having a slender column, inverted bell-shaped capital with acanthus leaves and scrolls. Cornerstone Afoundation stone often with dates or builder(s) inscribed.
    [Show full text]