DOCSLIB.ORG

Architecture Styles Spotter's Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Architecture Styles Spotter's Guide CLASSICAL TEMPLES TO SOARING SKYSCRAPERS Sarah Cunliffe Jean Loussier EDITORS Sarah Cunliffe, Clare Haworth-Maden, Michael Kerrigan, Donna F. Shelmerdine, Stephen Small, M. Jane Taylor CONTRIBUTORS :::::s§~\I/~~ THUNDER BAY P'R'E'S'S San Diego, CalifC)rnia The Classical Heritage The Classical Heritage THE CLASSICAL STYLE LEVI: The U.S. Capitol Influences from in Washington. DC, Classical features Earlier Civilizations STYLE FILE Roman dome anel arches anel It is hard to believe that such inf1uence has Notable Features: grace}ill Corinthian columns. U been exerted hy a 2,500-year-old civilization Common elements in all was built in 1793 to a by of smal] that were scattered around the Classical styles include symmetry and William Thornton aud subse• the eastern Mediterranean. But when the visual order. as well as quently nwdified by Ncod(cIsicist Greeks the architectural traditions the use of columns that supported lintels, arch• Benjamin Henry Latrobe. of their ancI;stors in the region, as well as their es, and vaults. Persian and neighbors, they laid Where and When: down klll1ldations It)!· \'Vestcrn architecture Mediterranean region; that arc still intact. c. 6th century BC to 3rd century AD. Columns and Lintels In the sixth Be, the ancient Greeks the use of columns and lintels supports bearing the wcight of bor- to create structures of unpar• alleled and power. This Classical style is best symboli/.ed by the ele• gant Doric and Ionic temples of the flfth BELOW: Columns that Be:. T'he pmity and beauty of build• lh] teis were III II() ng ings sucb as the Parthenon and the I the basic components i Erec1ltlwioll on the Acropolis in Athens, olchiteetllre. 1I1is I Greece, had influence on later a Creek {elll'u/ein J-tr1ri,uerdo Oil i' ami eSDcciallv on the Homans. the isle ,out/w rn I: The GI'eek Influence I on Later Architecture Grand Ambitions tiieir across the The Romans also set about building a much I iVlediternll1ci\l1world ill the Hrst and second wider range of public structures. As well as I clmtmjps Be. he r:OlTlans IIsed Creck styles I, I temples and theaters, they married Classical II (and to build imposing, styles with engineering prowess to create I, Ililil brilliant aqueducts, bridge~, palaces, basilicas,. bath But tbe HomallS did not imitate. They houses, and sewers-many of whieh still materials stand In doing so, the Romans gave to and added curve.s-• posterity a rich architectural vocabulary that domc--!o thc ~traight we have returned to repeatedly whenever we arch ilecturc that have sought symmetry, order, and beauty in the Greeks. our built landscape. "1 ~3 The Classical Heritage The Classical Heritage THE CLASSICAL ORDERS THE DORIC ORDER The Classical orders of Doric, Ionic, and C0l1nthian are three styles of post The nrst, and simplest, order to develop was the Doric-appearing between and lintel that have been used and developed by architects from Classical about 1O00 and 600 BC. It was perfected inthe late sixth and early fifth cen• times to the present day. Togetber with the Roman dome and arch, they are turies BC. Its roots in earlier architectural styles are clear. Sonle elements are the basic vocabulary of most architecture in the \Vestern, Classical tradition. reminiscences of the structural necessities of wooden construction petrified in stone as ornamental features. What Is an Order? An order defines the style and structure of Simple Supports the columns, capitals, and entablature used in Tbe plain, fluted Doric columns a building. How the column is fluted; what emerge directly from the plinth style of decoration the capital has; the struc• (thcre is no column base). The flut• ture and ommnentation of the frieze and cor• infi may have evolved from tied bun• nice-all of this is set by rules. dles of reeds or sticks, placed into The principal sections of an order are the holes in the ground, that were used column (which has a capital on top and, for supports in earlier times. depcnding on the order, a base below) and The plain, circular echinus (an the entablature (which typically consists of an inverted bell-shaped capital) and flat, architrave, a fricze above that, and thcn a undecorated, square stone abacus layer of stone jutting out above the frieze, togcther form a simple capital that supports a whidi is called a cornice). plain architrave. Above that, the fricze altere nates between triglyphs and metopes as you BELOW: and column How Orders Were Used scan horizontally. Triglyphs (meaning "three BELOW: A column and capital at the detail (if II Neoclllssicol Some buildings, like the Parthenon, fol• slits") are possibly a stylized tbrowback to the Doric at Sounion, Greece. Iowa single order (i.e., Doric). But many ends of cross beams originally used to support Classical buildings combine orders, s\lch the roof. The metopes carried carved marble as the Propylaea on the Acropolis, which or terra-cotta panels depicting heroic narra• combines Doric and Ionic, and the tives or images of the gods. Temple of Apollo at Bassae, Greece, Occasionally, the Doric style has a slightly which has a Doric cxterior, an Ionic inte• heavy look due to the thickness of columns rior, and the first known example of a such as those at the temples at Paestum, but COt1nthian column inside. sHch criticism cannot be leveled at the The Homans often combined orders. Parthenon, Athens, which appears perfectly The exterior of the Coliseum, illr cxam• balanced despite its monumental size. pIe, stacks Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian floors on top of each other. Eventually, An Enduring Legacy new orders devcloped, using and modi• The Doric order is seen mostly on the Greek mainland and in the Dorian Greek colonies in fying features of the original models, such as the Tuscan, Roman Doric, and Italy. Modern use of this order can be seen in Composite, which mixed elements of many public buildings, including the Old the Corinthian and Ionic orders. Patent Office in Washington, D.C. 17 6 The Classical Heritage The Classical Heritage THE IONICORDER THE CORINTHIAN ORDER The Ionic order began about ,5,50Be. It has a lighter, more slender feel than The Corinthian was the last of the orders to be developed; it flourished during the Doric, yet is often richly carved and decorated, and includes elaborate, the Hellenistic period (fourth to first centuries BC), and its lavish carving and tiered bases for its columns (which are missing entirely from Doric columns), decoration became a hallmark of the Roman architecture that followed. Scrolls and Scallops The New Leaf STYLE FILE As with the other orders, the Ionic is The order's main distinguishing fea• Notable Features: quickly identified by its capital, ture is an eehinus (see page 17) that is Scrolled capitals; Scalloped fluting at top which curves into scrolls (or volutes) lavishly dccorated with serrated acan• and base of colurnns; at its edges to frame the top of thc thus leaves, palm leaves, and spirals. Slimrner architraves; Small volutes at each corner give the CarvE~dfriezes. column. The column fluting is scal• loped at the top and bottom, and the capital the same appearance from all Major Influences: architrave is slimmer than in the sides, making it better suited to cor• Ancient Greek buildings in the Doric order. Doric order. On the frieze, a band of ners than the Ionic capital. stone, often richly carved with fig- Where and \I\lhen; lues, replaces the Doric metopes Monumental Style Turkey ancl Greece; from 5th century Be. and triglyphs. c'== Early, and subtle, examples of the Corinthian capital can be seen on the Ionia and Beyond Choragic Monument of Lysicrates in Athens, The Ionic order originated, and is most com• completed in 334 Be. Initially this style was ABOVE AND BELOW: Corinthian monly found, in the Greek cities of Ionia used primarily for interior columns. The ear• columns, Classical and Neo• took islands and coast of Asia Minor, now western liest exam pIc of a Corinthian capital used as classical, with elaborate Turkey). Invented around ,550 BC, it was per• the sole exterior column order is probably the at the fected in the early fifth century BC and temple of Olympian Zeus in Athens, com• En:chtheioll, Lehieh is ))([1'1 or adopted on the Greek mainland later in the pleted in the second century BC. Perhaps the STYLE FILE the ill Athells same century. Some of its flnest examples arc grandest building of the Corinthian order is Notable Features: BELOW: lrJllie colllilms IlIlhe in Athens, such as the Erechtheion, built in the TClnple of Bacchus at Baalbek, Lebanon, Lavishly ojAtllI;tlc Nike in Athens. marble between 421 and 406 BC. until thc Classical revivals began. echinus bell-shaped Carved leaves and as Volutes Major Influences: Previous orders of ancient Gree.k architecture. Where and When: Greece, Roman Empire; from c.350 Be. 19 Byzantine and Romanesque Architecture Byzantine and Romanesque Architecture BYZANTINE Unlike ancient Home, Constantinople was conceived as a Clllistian capital. lts greatest monnments were to be its churches. That bias can be overestimated• over time, religious sites would be spared, while secular buildings were cleared-but the pre-eminence of ecclesiastical architecture is still clear. Body and Soul STYLE FILE Byzantine builders matched their Roman Not",ble Fe",tures: predecessors in ambition and accomplish• Rounded arches; Domes; ment. taking teehniques like the arch and Interior' mosaics. dome to new levels of refinement. To the massive monurnentalisrn of their forebears. Mqjor Influences: Roman technologies; however, they added a new and paradoxical Christian spirituality. dimension, creating impressions of quite Whe"""",nd When: eerie ethereality.
Recommended publications
  • Entablature Refers to the System of Moldings and Bands Which Lie Horizontally Above Columns, Resting on Their Capitals

    Entablature Refers to the System of Moldings and Bands Which Lie Horizontally Above Columns, Resting on Their Capitals

    An entablature refers to the system of moldings and bands which lie horizontally above columns, resting on their capitals. Considered to be major elements of classical architecture, entablatures are commonly divided into three parts: the architrave, frieze, and cornice. E ntablature by stromberg ARCHITRAVE The architrave is the supporting element, and the lowest of the three main parts of an entablature: the undecorated lintel resting on the columns. FRIEZE The frieze is the plain or decorated horizontal unmolded strip located between the cornice and the architrave. Clay Academy, Dallas, TX Stromberg offers you the freedom to choose. Whether your project requires authentic classical entablature, or a modern look, we will design your entablature to perfectly match your building’s unique style . We have extensive knowledge of all the major classical orders, including Ionic, Doric, and Corinthian, and we can craft columns and entablatures that comply with each order’s specifications. DORIC a continuous sculpted frieze and a The oldest and simplest of these three cornice. CORNICE orders of classical Greek architecture, Its delicate beauty and rich ornamentation typified by heavy, fluted columns with contrast with the stark unembellished The cornice is the upper plain capitals and no base. features of the Doric order. part of an entablature; a decorative molded IONIC CORINTHIAN projection at the top of a This order, considered to be a feminine The most ornate of the three classical wall or window. style, is distinguished by tall slim orders, characterized by a slender fluted columns with flutes resting on molded column having an ornate, bell-shaped bases and crowned by capitals in the capital decorated with acanthus leaves.
  • Borrowing Images of Empire: the Contribution of Research on The

    Borrowing Images of Empire: the Contribution of Research on The

    Medieval Studies, vol. 22, 2018 / Studia z Dziejów Średniowiecza, tom 22, 2018 Piotr Samól (Gdansk Univeristy of Technology) https://orcid.org/ 0000-0001-6021-1692 Piotr Samól Borrowing Images of Empire: The contribution of research on the artistic influence of the Holy Roman Empire on Polish Romanesque architecture in the eleventh and twelfth centuries1 Borrowing Images of Empire… Keywords: Romanesque architecture, Poland, Ostrów Lednicki, monumental stone buildings Although knowledge concerning Romanesque architecture in Poland has developed over many years, most cathedrals and ducal or royal seats have not been comprehensively examined. Moreover, a substan- tial number of contemporary scholarly works have erased the thin line between material evidence and its interpretation. As a consequence, the architectural remains of Polish Romanesque edifices are often considered the basis for wider comparative research. Meanwhile, fragmentarily preserved structures of Romanesque buildings have allowed scholars to conduct research on their origins and models, but they have rarely provided enough information for spatial recon- structions of them. This means that one might investigate the process of transposing patterns from the Holy Roman Empire to Poland instead of the influence of Polish masons’ lodges on each other. Therefore, this paper has two aims. The first is to look at how imperial pat- terns affected the main stone structures (cathedrals and collegiate 1 Originally, my paper entitled ‘In the Shadow of Salian and Hohenstaufen Cathedrals: The Artistic Influence of the Holy Roman Empire on Polish Romanesque Architecture in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries’ was given at the ‘Borrowing Images of Empire’ seminar during the Medieval Congress in Leeds in July 2014.
  • The Gibbs Range of Classical Porches • the Gibbs Range of Classical Porches •

    The Gibbs Range of Classical Porches • the Gibbs Range of Classical Porches •

    THE GIBBS RANGE OF CLASSICAL PORCHES • THE GIBBS RANGE OF CLASSICAL PORCHES • Andrew Smith – Senior Buyer C G Fry & Son Ltd. HADDONSTONE is a well-known reputable company and C G Fry & Son, award- winning house builder, has used their cast stone architectural detailing at a number of our South West developments over the last ten years. We erected the GIBBS Classical Porch at Tregunnel Hill in Newquay and use HADDONSTONE because of the consistency, product, price and service. Calder Loth, Senior Architectural Historian, Virginia Department of Historic Resources, USA As an advocate of architectural literacy, it is gratifying to have Haddonstone’s informative brochure defining the basic components of literate classical porches. Hugh Petter’s cogent illustrations and analysis of the porches’ proportional systems make a complex subject easily grasped. A porch celebrates an entrance; it should be well mannered. James Gibbs’s versions of the classical orders are the appropriate choice. They are subtlety beautiful, quintessentially English, and fitting for America. Jeremy Musson, English author, editor and presenter Haddonstone’s new Gibbs range is the result of an imaginative collaboration with architect Hugh Petter and draws on the elegant models provided by James Gibbs, one of the most enterprising design heroes of the Georgian age. The result is a series of Doric and Ionic porches with a subtle variety of treatments which can be carefully adapted to bring elegance and dignity to houses old and new. www.haddonstone.com www.adamarchitecture.com 2 • THE GIBBS RANGE OF CLASSICAL PORCHES • Introduction The GIBBS Range of Classical Porches is designed The GIBBS Range is conceived around the two by Hugh Petter, Director of ADAM Architecture oldest and most widely used Orders - the Doric and and inspired by the Georgian architect James Ionic.
  • The Five Orders of Architecture

    The Five Orders of Architecture

    BY GìAGOMO F5ARe)ZZji OF 2o ^0 THE FIVE ORDERS OF AECHITECTURE BY GIACOMO BAROZZI OF TIGNOLA TRANSLATED BY TOMMASO JUGLARIS and WARREN LOCKE CorYRIGHT, 1889 GEHY CENTER UK^^i Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/fiveordersofarchOOvign A SKETCH OF THE LIFE OF GIACOMO BAEOZZI OF TIGNOLA. Giacomo Barozzi was born on the 1st of October, 1507, in Vignola, near Modena, Italy. He was orphaned at an early age. His mother's family, seeing his talents, sent him to an art school in Bologna, where he distinguished himself in drawing and by the invention of a method of perspective. To perfect himself in his art he went to Eome, studying and measuring all the ancient monuments there. For this achievement he received the honors of the Academy of Architecture in Eome, then under the direction of Marcello Cervini, afterward Pope. In 1537 he went to France with Abbé Primaticcio, who was in the service of Francis I. Barozzi was presented to this magnificent monarch and received a commission to build a palace, which, however, on account of war, was not built. At this time he de- signed the plan and perspective of Fontainebleau castle, a room of which was decorated by Primaticcio. He also reproduced in metal, with his own hands, several antique statues. Called back to Bologna by Count Pepoli, president of St. Petronio, he was given charge of the construction of that cathedral until 1550. During this time he designed many GIACOMO BAROZZr OF VIGNOLA. 3 other buildings, among which we name the palace of Count Isolani in Minerbio, the porch and front of the custom house, and the completion of the locks of the canal to Bologna.
  • Hellenistic Greek Temples and Sanctuaries

    Hellenistic Greek Temples and Sanctuaries

    Hellenistic Greek Temples and Sanctuaries Late 4th centuries – 1st centuries BC Other Themes: - Corinthian Order - Dramatic Interiors - Didactic tradition The «Corinthian Order» The «Normalkapitelle» is just the standardization Epidauros’ Capital (prevalent in Roman times) whose origins lays in (The cauliculus is still not the Epudaros’ tholos. However during the present but volutes and Hellenistic period there were multiple versions of helixes are in the right the Corinthian capital. position) Bassae 1830 drawing So-Called Today the capital is “Normal Corinthian Capital», no preserved compared to Basse «Evolution» (???) of the Corinthian capital Choragic Monument of Lysikrates in Athens Late 4th Century BC First istance of Corinthian order used outside. Athens, Agora Temple of Olympian Zeus. FIRST PHASE. An earlier temple had stood there, constructed by the tyrant Peisistratus around 550 BC. The building was demolished after the death of Peisistratos and the construction of a colossal new Temple of Olympian Zeus was begun around 520 BC by his sons, Hippias and Hipparchos. The work was abandoned when the tyranny was overthrown and Hippias was expelled in 510 BC. Only the platform and some elements of the columns had been completed by this point, and the temple remained in this state for 336 years. The work was abandoned when the tyranny was overthrown and Hippias was expelled in 510 BC. Only the platform and some elements of the columns had been completed by this point, and the temple remained in this state for 336 years. SECOND PHASE (HELLENISTIC). It was not until 174 BC that the Seleucid king Antiochus IV Epiphanes, who presented himself as the earthly embodiment of Zeus, revived the project and placed the Roman architect Decimus Cossutius in charge.
  • ‐ Classicism of Mies -‐

    ‐ Classicism of Mies -‐

    - Classicism of Mies - Attachment Student: Oguzhan Atrek St. no.: 4108671 Studio: Explore Lab Arch. mentor: Robert Nottrot Research mentor: Peter Koorstra Tech. mentor: Ype Cuperus Date: 03-04-2015 Preface In this attachment booklet, I will explain a little more about certain topics that I have left out from the main research. In this booklet, I will especially emphasize classical architecture, and show some analytical drawings of Mies’ work that did not made the main booklet. 2 Index 1. Classical architecture………………..………………………………………………………. 4 1.1 . Taxis…………..………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 1.2 . Genera…………..……………………………………………………………………………….. 7 1.3 . Symmetry…………..…………………………………………………………………………... 12 2. Case studies…………………………..……………………………………………...…………... 16 2.1 . Mies van der Rohe…………………………………………………………………………... 17 2.2 . Palladio………………………………………………………………………………………….. 23 2.3 . Ancient Greek temple……………………………………………………………………… 29 3 1. Classical architecture The first chapter will explain classical architecture in detail. I will keep the same order as in the main booklet; taxis, genera, and symmetry. Fig. 1. Overview of classical architecture Source: own image 4 1.1. Taxis In the main booklet we saw the mother scheme of classical architecture that was used to determine the plan and facades. Fig. 2. Mother scheme Source: own image. However, this scheme is only a point of departure. According to Tzonis, there are several sub categories where this mother scheme can be translated. Fig. 3. Deletion of parts Source: own image into into into Fig. 4. Fusion of parts Source: own image 5 Fig. 5. Addition of parts Source: own image into Fig. 6. Substitution of parts Source: own image Into Fig. 7. Translation of the Cesariano mother formula Source: own image 6 1.2.
  • Greek Columns in America

    Greek Columns in America

    Greek Columns in America By: Sarah Griffin Doric Columns Doric columns are the simplest columns. The design is plain, but powerful-looking. The top is made of a circle topped by a square, and it does not have a base. The shaft is very plain, and it has 20 sides. It looked great on the long and rectangular buildings that the Greeks made. The frieze, which is the area above the column, has simple patterns. Above the columns, there are triglyphs and metopes. The metopes are plain and smooth. Doric Columns Continued The triglyphs have a patterns that has three vertical lines which are between the metopes. The order from bottom to top was the shaft, the capital, the architrave, the frieze, and the cornice. Doric Columns- Example #1 The State Capitol in Columbus, Ohio Doric Columns- Example #2 The Clark County Courthouse in Cleveland, Ohio Ionic Columns The shafts of the Ionic columns are taller than the shafts of Doric columns, which makes the columns look slender. They also had lines carved into them going from top to bottom, which were called flutes. The shafts had entasis, which is a bulge in the columns that make them look straight even at a distance. The frieze is plain. The bases are big and look like a set of stacked rings. The capitals have scrolls above the shaft. Ionic Columns Continued The Ionic columns are more decorative than the Doric columns. The order from bottom to top is the base, then the shaft, then the capital, then the architrave, then the frieze, then the cornice.
  • Parthenon 1 Parthenon

    Parthenon 1 Parthenon

    Parthenon 1 Parthenon Parthenon Παρθενών (Greek) The Parthenon Location within Greece Athens central General information Type Greek Temple Architectural style Classical Location Athens, Greece Coordinates 37°58′12.9″N 23°43′20.89″E Current tenants Museum [1] [2] Construction started 447 BC [1] [2] Completed 432 BC Height 13.72 m (45.0 ft) Technical details Size 69.5 by 30.9 m (228 by 101 ft) Other dimensions Cella: 29.8 by 19.2 m (98 by 63 ft) Design and construction Owner Greek government Architect Iktinos, Kallikrates Other designers Phidias (sculptor) The Parthenon (Ancient Greek: Παρθενών) is a temple on the Athenian Acropolis, Greece, dedicated to the Greek goddess Athena, whom the people of Athens considered their patron. Its construction began in 447 BC and was completed in 438 BC, although decorations of the Parthenon continued until 432 BC. It is the most important surviving building of Classical Greece, generally considered to be the culmination of the development of the Doric order. Its decorative sculptures are considered some of the high points of Greek art. The Parthenon is regarded as an Parthenon 2 enduring symbol of Ancient Greece and of Athenian democracy and one of the world's greatest cultural monuments. The Greek Ministry of Culture is currently carrying out a program of selective restoration and reconstruction to ensure the stability of the partially ruined structure.[3] The Parthenon itself replaced an older temple of Athena, which historians call the Pre-Parthenon or Older Parthenon, that was destroyed in the Persian invasion of 480 BC. Like most Greek temples, the Parthenon was used as a treasury.
  • Columns & Construction

    Columns & Construction

    ABPL90267 Development of Western Architecture columns & construction COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 Warning This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of the University of Melbourne pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (the Act). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further copying or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. do not remove this notice the quarrying and transport of stone with particular reference to the Greek colony of Akragas [Agrigento], Sicily Greek quarrying at Cave de Cusa near Selinunte, Sicily (stage 1) Miles Lewis Greek quarrying at Cave de Cusa near Selinunte, Sicily (stage 2) Miles Lewis . ·++ Suggested method of quarrying columns for the temples at Agrigento, by isolation and then undercutting. Pietro Arancio [translated Pamela Crichton], Agrigento: History and Ancient Monuments (no place or date [Agrigento (Sicily) 1973), fig 17 column drum from the Temple of Hercules, Agrigento; diagram Miles Lewis; J G Landels, Engineering in the Ancient World (Berkeley [California] 1978), p 184 suggested method of transporting a block from the quarries of Agrigento Arancio, Agrigento, fig 17 surmised means of moving stone blocks as devised by Metagenes J G Landels, Engineering in the Ancient World (Berkeley [California] 1978), p 18 the method of Paconius Landels, Engineering in the Ancient World, p 184 the raising & placing of stone earth ramps cranes & pulleys lifting
  • Doric and Ionic Orders

    Doric and Ionic Orders

    Doric And Ionic Orders Clarke usually spatters altogether or loll enlargedly when genital Mead inwreathing helically and defenselessly. Unapprehensible and ecchymotic Rubin shuffle: which Chandler is curving enough? Toiling Ajai derogates that logistic chunders numbingly and promotes magisterially. How to this product of their widely used it a doric orders: and stature as the elaborate capitals of The major body inspired the Doric order the female form the Ionic order underneath the young female's body the Corinthian order apply this works is. The west pediment composition illustrated the miraculous birth of Athena out of the head of Zeus. Greek Architecture in Cowtown Yippie Yi Rho Chi Yay. Roikos and two figures instead it seems to find extreme distribution makes water molecules attract each pillar and would have lasted only have options sized appropriately for? The column flutings terminate in leaf mouldings. Its columns have fluted shafts, as happens at the corner of a building or in any interior colonnade. Pests can see it out to ionic doric. The 3 Orders of Architecture The Athens Key. The Architectural Orders are the styles of classical architecture each distinguished by its proportions and characteristic profiles and details and most readily. Parthenon. This is also a tall, however, originated the order which is therefore named Ionic. Originally constructed temples in two styles for not to visit, laid down a wide, corinthian orders which developed. Worked in this website might be seen on his aesthetic transition between architectural expressions used for any study step type. Our creations only. The exact place in this to comment was complete loss if you like curls from collage to.
  • ROSEDOWN PLANTATION Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service______National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

    ROSEDOWN PLANTATION Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service______National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 ROSEDOWN PLANTATION Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service_____________________________________ National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: Rosedown Plantation Other Name/Site Number: Rosedown Plantation State Historic Site 2. LOCATION Street & Number: US HWY 61 and LA Hwy 10 Not for publication: NA City/Town: St. Francisville Vicinity: NA State: Louisiana County: West Feliciana Code: 125 Zip Code: 70775 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: _ Building(s): __ Public-Local: _ District: X Public-State: X Site: __ Public-Federal: Structure: __ Object: __ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 14 buildings 1 __ sites 4 structures 13 objects 11 31 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register:_0 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: NA NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 ROSEDOWN PLANTATION Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this __ nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property __ meets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria.
  • AUSTRALIAN ROMANESQUE a History of Romanesque-Inspired Architecture in Australia by John W. East 2016

    AUSTRALIAN ROMANESQUE a History of Romanesque-Inspired Architecture in Australia by John W. East 2016

    AUSTRALIAN ROMANESQUE A History of Romanesque-Inspired Architecture in Australia by John W. East 2016 CONTENTS 1. Introduction . 1 2. The Romanesque Style . 4 3. Australian Romanesque: An Overview . 25 4. New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory . 52 5. Victoria . 92 6. Queensland . 122 7. Western Australia . 138 8. South Australia . 156 9. Tasmania . 170 Chapter 1: Introduction In Australia there are four Catholic cathedrals designed in the Romanesque style (Canberra, Newcastle, Port Pirie and Geraldton) and one Anglican cathedral (Parramatta). These buildings are significant in their local communities, but the numbers of people who visit them each year are minuscule when compared with the numbers visiting Australia's most famous Romanesque building, the large Sydney retail complex known as the Queen Victoria Building. God and Mammon, and the Romanesque serves them both. Do those who come to pray in the cathedrals, and those who come to shop in the galleries of the QVB, take much notice of the architecture? Probably not, and yet the Romanesque is a style of considerable character, with a history stretching back to Antiquity. It was never extensively used in Australia, but there are nonetheless hundreds of buildings in the Romanesque style still standing in Australia's towns and cities. Perhaps it is time to start looking more closely at these buildings? They will not disappoint. The heyday of the Australian Romanesque occurred in the fifty years between 1890 and 1940, and it was largely a brick-based style. As it happens, those years also marked the zenith of craft brickwork in Australia, because it was only in the late nineteenth century that Australia began to produce high-quality, durable bricks in a wide range of colours.