DOCSLIB.ORG

List of Dams and Hydroelectric Power Plants Which Su-Yapi Has Participated Since 1975

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

LIST OF DAMS AND HYDROELECTRIC POWER PLANTS WHICH SU-YAPI HAS PARTICIPATED SINCE 1975 PURPOSE SERVICES PROVIDED HEIGHT INSTALLED FROM ASSOCIATING NO. PROJECT NAME LOCATION DAM TYPE POWER YEAR PAST WORKED ON CLIENT & REMARKS FOUNDATIO FIRMS (MW) N (m) ENERGY IRRIGATION MISCELLANEOUS FEASIBILITY FINAL DESIGN DETAIL DESIGN CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION & CONS. BASIN MASTER PLAN TURKEY EARTH + 1GÜZELHİSAR DAM + 89 - + 1975-1978 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor İzmir ROCK FILL DOĞANCI DAM TURKEY 2 + ROCK FILL 82 - + 1975-1978 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor (Selahattin Saygı) Bursa TURKEY 3 KÜLTEPE DAM + EARTH FILL 42.7 - + 1976-1978 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Kırşehir TURKEY 4 İVRİZ DAM + + EARTH FILL 45 - + 1976-1978 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Konya TURKEY 5 SEVİŞLER DAM + EARTH FILL 65 - + 1977-1978 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Manisa TURKEY 6KALECİK DAM + ROCK FILL 80 - + 1977-1978 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Osmaniye 7 KIZILDERE DAM ++ TURKEY EARTH + 50 90 + 1975-1978 Diversion-Bottom Outlet, Spillway, INDIVIDUALLY & KÖKLÜCE HEPP Tokat ROCK FILL Energy Water Intake Structure, Energy Tunnel Excavation, Shoring DSİ, Contractor and Partial Coating, Surge Tank TURKEY EARTH + 8 KAYABOĞAZI DAM + 45 - + 1976-1979 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Kütahya ROCK FILL ALTINKAYA DAM TURKEY Cofferdams, Diversion EPDC, SU-İŞ, 9 ++ ROCK FILL 195 700 + 1976-1979 DSİ & HEPP Samsun Structures (including Gate) TMB DERBENT DAM TURKEY Spillway, Diversion and Energy EPDC, SU-İŞ, 10 +++ ROCK FILL 37 56 + 1976-1979 DSİ & HEPP Samsun Water Intake Structure TMB TURKEY 11 KOVALI DAM + EARTH FILL 48,5 - + 1977-1979 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Kayseri OYMAPINAR DAM TURKEY Dam Crest, Tail Water Outlet 12 + CONCRETE ARCH 185 540 + 1979-1981 INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor & HEPP Antalya Structure Switchyard (Const.) KOÇKÖPRÜ DAM & TURKEY (2) (1) (1) 1979-1981 (1) Entire Dam Except the Body 13 ++ ROCK FILL 60 8,5 INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor HEPP Van + + (2) 1986-1987 (2) Energy Structures ALTINKAYA DAM & TURKEY 14 ++ ROCK FILL 195 700 + 1979-1981 Diversion Structures INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor HEPP Samsun - Su-Yapı has been working on Dams and HEPP since 1964. This list includes the services that have been performed after year 1975. - The explanation on the items with (+) for detail design services is given on page 18/18. 16.10.2018 Page: 1/18 LIST OF DAMS AND HYDROELECTRIC POWER PLANTS WHICH SU-YAPI HAS PARTICIPATED SINCE 1975 PURPOSE SERVICES PROVIDED HEIGHT INSTALLED FROM ASSOCIATING NO. PROJECT NAME LOCATION DAM TYPE POWER YEAR PAST WORKED ON CLIENT & REMARKS FOUNDATIO FIRMS (MW) N (m) ENERGY IRRIGATION MISCELLANEOUS FEASIBILITY FINAL DESIGN DETAIL DESIGN CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION & CONS. BASIN MASTER PLAN Cofferdams, Diversion-Bottom KAYRAKTEPE TURKEY Outlet Structures, Body, EPDC, SU-İŞ, 15 ++ ROCK FILL 196 420 + 1980-1982 EİEİ DAM & HEPP Mersin Spillway, Energy Water Intake TMB Structure, Switchyard TURKEY 16 AĞCAŞAR DAM + EARTH FILL 30 - + 1977-1985 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Kayseri MANAVGAT TURKEY Entire Dam Except the Body KEPEZ Elec. Inc., 17 + EARTH FILL 31 40 + 1983-1986 INDIVIDUALLY DAM & HEPP Antalya and Hydromechanical Contractor BÜYÜKÇEKMECE TURKEY 18 + EARTH FILL 11.4 - + 1984-1986 Spillway INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor DAM İstanbul TURKEY 19 ÇATÖREN DAM + EARTH FILL 45 - + 1984-1986 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Eskişehir TURKEY 20 SEKKÖY DAM + EARTH FILL 40 - + + 1985-1986 Entire Dam INDIVIDUALLY TEK, Contractor Muğla LAMAS III & IV IIIA 9.35 TURKEY RIVER POWER 21 HYDROELECTRICITY + 40 IIIB 9.35 + 1986-1987 Entire Dam INDIVIDUALLY TGT Mersin PLANT STAGES IV 22.95 BOYABAT TURKEY CONCRETE Power Plant Building, Control EPDC, SU-İŞ, 22 + 195 510 + 1985-1987 DSİ DAM & HEPP Sinop GRAVITY Building and Roads TMB KAPULUKAYA TURKEY Diversion-Bottom Outlet, 23 ++ EARTH FILL 63 51 + 1979-1987 INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor DAM & HEPP Kırıkkale Spillway, Energy Structure KILIÇKAYA TURKEY 24 + ROCK FILL 140 120 + 1980-1987 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor DAM & HEPP Tokat MENZELET TURKEY Entire Dam (A revis.project has 25 +++ ROCK FILL 150,5 120 + 1980-1987 INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor DAM & HEPP K.Maraş been submitted for the body) ALTINKAYA TURKEY Consultancy, Supervision EPDC, 26 ++ ROCK FILL 195 700 + + 1982-1988 DSİ DAM & HEPP Samsun Services SUİŞ, TMB ADIGÜZEL TURKEY 27 +++ ROCK FILL 145 61 + 1982-1987 Energy Structures and HEPP INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Müteahhit DAM & HEPP Denizli KARACAÖREN TURKEY 28 +++ EARTH FILL 95 32 + 1982-1987 Energy Structures and HEPP INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor DAM & HEPP Burdur TURKEY 29 YAHYASARAY DAM + EARTH FILL 51 - + 1984-1987 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Yozgat - The explanation on the items with (+) for detail design services is given on page 18/18. 16.10.2018 Page: 2/18 LIST OF DAMS AND HYDROELECTRIC POWER PLANTS WHICH SU-YAPI HAS PARTICIPATED SINCE 1975 PURPOSE SERVICES PROVIDED HEIGHT INSTALLED FROM ASSOCIATING NO. PROJECT NAME LOCATION DAM TYPE POWER YEAR PAST WORKED ON CLIENT & REMARKS FOUNDATIO FIRMS (MW) N (m) ENERGY IRRIGATION MISCELLANEOUS FEASIBILITY FINAL DESIGN DETAIL DESIGN CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION & CONS. BASIN MASTER PLAN ÇAVDARHİSAR TURKEY 30 + EARTH FILL 51 - + 1985-1987 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor DAM Kütahya TURKEY 31 POLAT DAM + ROCK FILL 56 - + 1985-1987 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Malatya TURKEY 32 EĞREKKAYA DAM + + EARTH FILL 100 - + 1985-1987 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Ankara TURKEY 33 ÜRKMEZ DAM + + EARTH FILL 38 - + 1985-1987 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor İzmir TURKEY EARTH+ 34 ÇAT DAM + 74 - + 1985-1987 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Adıyaman ROCK FILL TURKEY EARTH+ 35 AHMETLER DAM + 52 - + + 1985-1987 Entire Dam INDIVIDUALLY TEK, Contractor Muğla ROCK FILL TURKEY 36 HANAY KÜL DAM + ROCK FILL 65 - + + 1985-1987 Entire Dam INDIVIDUALLY TEK, Contractor Muğla TURKEY 37 SARIMEHMET DAM + EARTH FILL 62,5 - + 1987-1991 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Van TURKEY 38 KÜRE-ÇATAK DAM + ROCK FILL 35 - + + 1990-1991 Entire Dam INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Kastamonu TURKEY 39 GAYT DAM + EARTH FILL 36,5 - + 1990-1991 Spillway INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Bingöl TURKEY 40 ÇAMGAZİ DAM + EARTH FILL 45 - + 1990-1991 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Adıyaman TURKEY CONCRETE Entire Dam Except the Body, KEPEZ Elec. Inc., 41 KARACAÖREN II HEPP + + 49 47 + 1989-1991 INDIVIDUALLY Burdur GRAVITY Switchyard and Mechanical Contractor TURKEY Entire Dam 42 ÇAMALAN DAM + EARTH FILL 42,5 - + + 1991-1992 INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Ankara Feasibility Report for BOT TURKEY RIVER POWER Feasibility & Final Design for 43 KOVADA III HEPP + - 5 + + 1991-1992 INDIVIDUALLY GÖKDERE Inc. Isparta PLANT BOT TURKEY EARTH+ 44 ARMAĞAN DAM + 57,25 - + 1986-1993 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Kırklareli ROCK FILL BOYABAT DAM & TURKEY EARTH+ 45 + 195 510 + 1991-1993 Diversion Tunnels INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor HEPP Sinop ROCK FILL - The explanation on the items with (+) for detail design services is given on page 18/18. BOT : Build-Operate-Transfer Model 16.10.2018 Page: 3/18 LIST OF DAMS AND HYDROELECTRIC POWER PLANTS WHICH SU-YAPI HAS PARTICIPATED SINCE 1975 PURPOSE SERVICES PROVIDED HEIGHT INSTALLED FROM ASSOCIATING NO. PROJECT NAME LOCATION DAM TYPE POWER YEAR PAST WORKED ON CLIENT & REMARKS FOUNDATIO FIRMS (MW) N (m) ENERGY IRRIGATION MISCELLANEOUS FEASIBILITY FINAL DESIGN DETAIL DESIGN CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION & CONS. BASIN MASTER PLAN TURKEY 46 SAZLIDERE DAM + ROCK FILL 47 - + 1991-1993 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor İstanbul YEDİGÖZE DAM & TURKEY 47 ++ ROCK FILL 131 300 + 1993 Feasibility Report for BOT INDIVIDUALLY ATA Cons. Inc. HEPP Adana BOYABAT DAM & TURKİYE CONCRETE 48 + 195 510 + 1993 Feasibility Report for BOT INDIVIDUALLY ATA Cons. Inc. HEPP Sinop GRAVITY GEZENDE DAM & TURKEY 49 + CONCRETE ARCH 72 150 + 1983-1994 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor HEPP Karaman TURKEY DSİ, Contractor 50 KİRAZDERE DAM + ROCK FILL 108,5 - + 1987-1997 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY Kocaeli İzmit Water Inc. TURKEY 51 YENİHAYAT DAM + EARTH FILL 68,3 - + 1991-1996 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Çorum TURKEY 52 ERFELEK DAM + EARTH FILL 91,5 - + 1993-1995 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Sinop TURKEY 53 KUZGUN DAM & HEPP + + ROCK FILL 120 22,7 + 1985-1997 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Erzurum TURKEY 54 DİCLE DAM & HEPP + + ROCK FILL 87 110 + 1993-2000 Switchyard and HEPP INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Diyarbakır TURKEY EARTH+ 55 BATMAN DAM & HEPP + + 85,5 198 + 1986-2000 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Diyarbakır ROCK FILL DSİ, Contractor (Final design has been TURKEY CONCRETE FACE revised, underground power 56 KÜRTÜN DAM & HEPP + 125 80 + 1986-2001 Entire Dam INDIVIDUALLY Gümüşhane ROCK FILL plant and tunnel spillway and front face cover have been designed) TURKEY 57 PALANDÖKEN DAM + + EARTH FILL 49 - + 1994-2001 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Erzurum TURKEY EARTH+ DSİ 58 ADATEPE DAM + + 95 - + 1995- Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY K.Maraş ROCK FILL LİMAK
Recommended publications
  • (Cyprinus Carpio L., 1758) from Tercan Dam Lake, Eastern Anatolia, Turkey

    (Cyprinus Carpio L., 1758) from Tercan Dam Lake, Eastern Anatolia, Turkey

    Erzincan Üniversitesi Erzincan University Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi Journal of Science and Technology 2020, 13(2), 609-619 2020, 13(2), 609-619 ISSN: 1307-9085, e-ISSN: 2149-4584 DOI: 10.18185/erzifbed.698577 Araştırma Makalesi Research Article Length-Weight Relationships and Fulton’s Condition Factor of Common carp (Cyprinus carpio L., 1758) from Tercan Dam Lake, Eastern Anatolia, Turkey Özge ZENCİR TANIR1* 1 Kemah Vocational School, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan-TURKEY Geliş / Received: 04/03/2020, Kabul / Accepted: 10/07/2020 Abstract In this study, length-weight relationships (LWR) and Fulton’s condition factor (K) values of totally 190 Common carp, Cyprinus carpio L., 1758 specimens, captured from Tercan Dam Lake between May 2017- October 2017, were examined. Sex composition was 41.58 % (n=79) female and 58.42 % (n=111) male. Female to male sex ratio of the population was found as 1:0.71. Fork length and weight values of overall, female and male specimens ranged from 11.2-55.5 cm/30.2-2860.5 g, 11.2-55.5 cm/30.2-2860.5 g and 12.7-47.5 cm/44.6- 1846.9 g, respectively. K values varied between 1.204 and 4.008. The average value of its was calculated as 2.155±0.041 for females, 2.138±0.046 for males and 2.148±0.030 for overall. The LWR were determined W= 0.0646*FL2.6613 for females, W=0.0389*FL2.8103 for males and W=0.0528*FL2.7202 for overall. The values of b was estimated as 2.66 (females); 2.81 (males); 2.72 in overall.
  • Cooperation on Turkey's Transboundary Waters

    Cooperation on Turkey's Transboundary Waters

    Cooperation on Turkey's transboundary waters Aysegül Kibaroglu Axel Klaphake Annika Kramer Waltina Scheumann Alexander Carius Status Report commissioned by the German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety F+E Project No. 903 19 226 Oktober 2005 Imprint Authors: Aysegül Kibaroglu Axel Klaphake Annika Kramer Waltina Scheumann Alexander Carius Project management: Adelphi Research gGmbH Caspar-Theyß-Straße 14a D – 14193 Berlin Phone: +49-30-8900068-0 Fax: +49-30-8900068-10 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.adelphi-research.de Publisher: The German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety D – 11055 Berlin Phone: +49-01888-305-0 Fax: +49-01888-305 20 44 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.bmu.de © Adelphi Research gGmbH and the German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, 2005 Cooperation on Turkey's transboundary waters i Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 1.1 Motive and main objectives ........................................................................................1 1.2 Structure of this report................................................................................................3 2 STRATEGIC ROLE OF WATER RESOURCES FOR THE TURKISH ECONOMY..........5 2.1 Climate and water resources......................................................................................5 2.2 Infrastructure development.........................................................................................7
  • Southeast Anatolia Project (Gap) Regional Development Administration Coverage

    Southeast Anatolia Project (Gap) Regional Development Administration Coverage

    SOUTHEAST ANATOLIA PROJECT (GAP) REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION COVERAGE • SOUTHEAST ANATOLIA PROJECT(GAP) • GAP ACTON PLAN (2008-2012) • GAP ACTON PLAN (2014-2018) • GAP REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION (GAP RDA) • INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES • COMPETITIVE AGENDA GAP REGION TURKEY – GAP COMPARISION TURKEY GAP GAP/TR (%) Total Area (km2) 779 452 75 193 9.7 Population (milyon)* 77.69 8.25 10.6 Annual Population Growth Rate 13.31 18.88 (thousand)(2013-2014) * 2014 Results of Address Based Population Registration System LAND POTENTIAL TOTAL AREA GAP REGION OTHER 9.7 % 90.3 % ECONOMICALLY IRRIGABLE AREA GAP REGION 20.0 % OTHER 80.0 % TURKEY’S WATER POTANTIAL BY BASIN Euphrates-Tigris 28 72 Other EUPHRATES OTHER 17% 47% TIGRIS 11% EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN WESTERN ANTALYA EASTERN 6% BLACK SEA 6% BLACK SEA 5% 8% DEVELOPMENT STAGES of GAP •1936 Establishment of Electrical Power Resources Survey and Development Administration •1960 The studies on Euphrates and Tigris rivers •1977 Bringing together all studies under GAP (GAP Water based Development Project Package) • 1986 State Planning Organization (SPO) as coordinating body for the integrated regional development project of GAP • 1989 GAP Master Plan • 1989 Establishment of the GAP Regional Development Administration • 2002 GAP Regional Development Plan (2002-2010) • 2008 GAP Action Plan (2008-2012) • 2014 GAP Action Plan (2014-2018) GAP WATER and SOIL RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME EUPHRATES TIGRIS Karakaya Dam/HPP Dicle - Kralkızı Aşağı Fırat Batman Sınır Fırat Batman - Silvan Suruc – Baziki Garzan Adıyaman – Kahta Ilısu Adıyaman–Göksu–Araban Cizre Gaziantep Total water potential of Turkey :186 billion m³. 32 billion m³ from Euphrates and 21 billion m³ from Tigris, GAP Region 53 billion m³.
  • Optimisation of the Tigris River Hydropower System Operations

    Optimisation of the Tigris River Hydropower System Operations

    OPTIMISATION OF THE TIGRIS RIVER HYDROPOWER SYSTEM OPERATIONS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY EMRAH YALÇIN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN CIVIL ENGINEERING MAY 2015 Approval of the thesis: OPTIMISATION OF THE TIGRIS RIVER HYDROPOWER SYSTEM OPERATIONS submitted by EMRAH YALÇIN in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Civil Engineering Department, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Gülbin Dural Ünver Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. Ahmet Cevdet Yalçıner Head of Department, Civil Engineering Assoc. Prof. Dr. Şahnaz Tiğrek Supervisor, Civil Engineering Dept., Batman University Examining Committee Members: Prof. Dr. A. Melih Yanmaz Civil Engineering Dept., METU Assoc. Prof. Dr. Şahnaz Tiğrek Civil Engineering Dept., Batman University Assoc. Prof. Dr. Elçin Kentel Civil Engineering Dept., METU Asst. Prof. Dr. Önder Koçyiğit Civil Engineering Dept., Gazi University Asst. Prof. Dr. Aslı Numanoğlu Genç Civil Engineering Dept., Atılım University Date: 22.05.2015 I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Emrah Yalçın Signature : iv ABSTRACT OPTIMISATION OF THE TIGRIS RIVER HYDROPOWER SYSTEM OPERATIONS Yalçın, Emrah Ph.D., Department of Civil Engineering Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Şahnaz Tiğrek May 2015, 146 pages Growing external energy dependence and rising oil prices are encouraging Turkey to turn to renewable energy, especially hydropower.
  • The Methods Used in Monitoring of Large Dams in Turkey

    The Methods Used in Monitoring of Large Dams in Turkey

    ©2020 Published in 8th International Symposium on Innovative Technologies in Engineering and Science 23-25 October 2020 (ISITES2020 Bursa - Turkey) https://doi.org/10.33793/acperpro.03.01.51 The Methods Used in Monitoring of Large Dams in Turkey Haluk BALI1*, Salih ALCAY2 1 The General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works, 5. Regional Directorate, 56. Division Office, Kırıkkale, Turkey, 2 Necmettin Erbakan University, Engineering and Achitecture Faculty, Geomatics Engineering Department, Konya, Turkey. Abstract Turkey is a very rich country in terms of water resources. However, in order to use these resources efficiently, water must be stored safely. In this context, the best form of storage is the construction of dams. In our country, large dams, which are among the world's important dams, are being built. Although there are many advantages of large dams, the loss of life and property will be so great in case of a possible deformation or destruction. The fact that dams are under the influence of various forces, as well as being located in the earthquake zone of our country, necessitates continuous monitoring of our dams. Dams are generally monitored using geodetic methods and geotechnical devices. However, mostly details of these two methods are evaluated separately in dam monitoring. Evaluating the results of both methods together is very important for the comprehensive monitoring of the dam and the correct interpretation of possible deformations. In this study, large dams in our country and monitoring studies carried out by using geodetic and geotechnical methods in these dams are given in detail. Key words: Dam, Deformation Monitoring, Geodetic, Geotechnical 1.
  • Republic of Turkey the Study on Optimal Power Generation for Peak Demand in Turkey

    Republic of Turkey the Study on Optimal Power Generation for Peak Demand in Turkey

    REPUBLIC OF TURKEY GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF ELECTRIC POWER RESOURCES SURVEY AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION TURKISH ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION CO. (TEIAS) REPUBLIC OF TURKEY THE STUDY ON OPTIMAL POWER GENERATION FOR PEAK DEMAND IN TURKEY February 2011 (2011) JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICA) IDD JR 10-131 Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background of the Study....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Purpose of the Study and Implementation Details............................................................................1 1.2.1 Purpose of the Study ...................................................................................................................1 1.2.2 Area in Which to Conduct the Study...........................................................................................1 1.2.3 Implementation Details (TOR).....................................................................................................1 1.3 Study Implementation Policy..............................................................................................................2 1.3.1 Scope of the Study Works...........................................................................................................2 1.3.2 Formulation of a Plan for Developing a Power Source..............................................................3
  • Limak Group of Companies Annual Report 2013 Limak Group of Companies Annual Report 2013

    Limak Group of Companies Annual Report 2013 Limak Group of Companies Annual Report 2013

    LİMAK GROUP OF COMPANIES ANNUAL REPORT 2013 LİMAK GROUP OF COMPANIES ANNUAL REPORT 2013 LİMAK GROUP OF COMPANIES ANNUAL REPORT 2013 Contents 6 Introduction 10 Limak Milestones 12 Group Composition 13 Our Global Collaborations CONSTRUCTION GROUP 16 Limak Construction Group Projects 20 İstanbul New Airport 22 Ankara High Speed Train Station 24 LimakPort İskenderun Modernization and Capacity Enhancement Project 26 Çandarlı Port Breakwater Construction 28 Ankara Drinking Water Supply Stage II Project, Gerede System 29 Tandoğan – Keçiören (M4) Subway Line 30 Ankara – Sivas High Speed Train Project, Yerköy – Yozgat – Sivas Section 31 Ankara – Sivas High Speed Train Project, Kırıkkale - Yerköy Section 32 Kahramanmaraş – Göksun 6th Regional Border Road 33 Yusufeli Dam and Hydro-electric Power Plant 34 Arkun Dam and Hydro-electric Power Plant 35 Adatepe Dam 36 Burgaz Dam 37 Kargı Dam and Hydro-electric Power Plant 39 Overseas Ongoing Projects 40 Rehabilitation and Expansion of Cairo International Airport, Terminal Building No.2 (TB2), Egypt 42 Ras Al Khair – Riyadh Water Transmission Line, Saudi Arabia 43 Ras Al Khair – Hafar Al Batin Water Transmission Line, Saudi Arabia 44 Qila Saifullah – Zhob (ICB-3B) N-50 Road, Pakistan 45 Sukkur – Shikarpur – Jacobadad (ICB-5) N-65 Highway, Pakistan 46 Gali – Zakho Tunnel, Iraq 47 Limak Babylon Hotel and Resort, Cyprus 48 Devoll Hydro-electric Power Plants, Albania 50 Skopje Mixed Use Superstructure Project, Macedonia 51 Projects Completed in 2013 52 Pristina International Airport Adem Jashari, Kosovo 54
  • Impact of Ataturk Dam on Regional Rainfall

    Impact of Ataturk Dam on Regional Rainfall

    IMPACT OF ATATURK DAM ON REGIONAL RAINFALL A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF APPLIED SCIENCES OF NEAR EAST UNIVERSITY By AIMABLE KAYITAKIRE In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering NICOSIA, 2016 Aimable KAYITAKIRE: IMPACT OF ATATURK DAM ON REGIONAL RAINFALL Approval of Director of Graduate School of Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. İlkay SALİHOĞLU We certify this thesis is satisfactory for the award of the degree of Masters of Science in Civil Engineering Examining Committee in Charge: Ass Prof. Dr. Burhan Yιldɩz Committee Member, Civil Engineering Department, CIU Ass Prof. Dr. Kabir Sadeghi Committee Member, Civil Engineering Department, NEU. Prof. Dr. Ata ATUN Supervisor, Civil Engineering Department, NEU. I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with the academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all materials and results that are not original to this work. Name, last name: Signature: Date: ACKNOWLEDGMENT I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor Prof. Dr. Ata Atun for the useful comments, remarks and engagement through the learning process of this master thesis. I express my special heartfelt gratitude to my family, which directly or indirectly has contributed to accomplish my research work. iv To my lovely family … v ABSTRACT Many natural resources are more often than not seasonal or at least depend on some certain environmental factors for abundance fluctuation; one of these important natural resources is water.
  • The-Zebra-Mussel-In-Turkey-Report2.Pdf

    The-Zebra-Mussel-In-Turkey-Report2.Pdf

    1 Report Name : The Zebra Mussel in Turkey Report No : 7 Prepared by Seyit Aksu,Dursun Yıldız ,Aysen Pervin Güngör Edited by Dursun Yıldız For citation : Aksu S.,Yıldız D.,Güngör P.A.,2017 "The Zebra Mussel in Turkey" .Report No: 7 Hydropolitics Association .Ankara-Turkey. --------------------------------------------------- © Copyright 2017 HPA,Ankara, Turkey. All rights reserved. No part of this report may be translated or reproduced in any form by print, photoprint, microfilm, or any other means without prior written permission of the Hydropolitics Association of Turkey. Güfte Sokak 8/9 06680 Kavaklıdere/Ankara/Turkey www.hidropolitikakademi.o 2 Contents Page Foreword ………………………...................................................................................4 CHAPTER I 1.1.Introduction ………………….. ……………………..................................................4 1.2. Spreading Areas in the World .................................................................................... CHAPTER II 2.1Zebra Mussel History……………………...............................................................11 2.2.Zebra Mussel Biology..................................................................................... 2.3.Zebra Mussels Effects.................................................................................. 2.3..1.Negative Effects of the Zebra Mussels on Hydro-Power Energy Generation CHAPTER III 3.1.Zebra Mussels Hıstory And Observatıons In Turkey......................................... 3.2.Spreading Areas in Turkey.................................................................................
  • Corporate Responsibility Report 2012 01

    Corporate Responsibility Report 2012 01

    Corporate Responsibility Report 2012 01 CONTENT DOĞUŞ GROUP STRUCTURE 02 OPERATIONAL MAP 04 OUR GROUP 06 Company Profile 06 Awards & Recognitions 07 Strategic Partnerships & Memberships 13 CHAIRMAN’s MESSAGE 14 CEO MESSAGE 16 CSR and SUSTAINABILITY at DOĞUŞ GROUP 18 CSR Strategy 18 CSR Management 19 Doğuş Group CSR Policies 20 Materiality 27 Stakeholder Engagement 27 ECONOMIC ENGAGEMENT 30 Responsible Business 30 Corporate Governance 30 Responsible Earning 31 Responsible Investment 33 Local Employment 33 Supply Chain Management 35 Community Development Programs 35 Public Policy Contributions 43 EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT 46 Open Communication 47 Employee Health and Safety 49 Performance Management 50 Training and Development Programs 5 1 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 54 Business Ethics 64 Customers 66 Human Rights 68 ENVIRONMENTAL ENGAGEMENT 72 Environmental Awareness Programs 72 Energy Efficiency 75 Waste Management 76 Water Consumption 77 PERFORMANCE DATA 79 ABOUT THIS REPORT 92 REPORTING CONTENT INDEX 94 INDEXES 95 GRI APPLICATION LEVEL CHECK 108 DOĞUŞ GROUP CR REPORT 2012 DOĞUŞ GROUP CR REPORT 2012 DOĞUŞ GROUP STRUCTURE Banking& Financial Automotive Construction Media Services TV RADYO Corporate Responsibility 02 03 Real New Tourism&Services Estate Energy Entertainment Initiatives Doğuş Energy Doğuş Energy Artvin HEPP Use Light Logo 9 mm and over cap height see opposite Antalya PLAZA Doğuş Energy Electricity Use Bold Logo under 9 mm cap height see opposite. This Logo can be used on screen or for embroderie etc. Whole Sale Co. DOĞUŞ GROUP CR REPORT 2012 DOĞUŞ GROUP CR REPORT 2012 OperatIONAL MAP 1 Romania Garanti Bank Romania-Headquarters & 78 Branches SC Motoractive Credit SA Ralfi IFN SA Domenia Credit SA 2 Bulgaria Doğuş Construction&Trade Inc.
  • Rule Curves for Operating Single- and Multi-Reservoir Hydropower Plants

    Rule Curves for Operating Single- and Multi-Reservoir Hydropower Plants

    RULE CURVES FOR OPERATING SINGLE- AND MULTI-RESERVOIR HYDROPOWER PLANTS MÜMTAZ AK FEBRUARY 2017 RULE CURVES FOR OPERATING SINGLE- AND MULTI-RESERVOIR HYDROPOWER PLANTS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY MÜMTAZ AK IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN CIVIL ENGINEERING FEBRUARY 2017 Approval of the thesis: RULE CURVES FOR OPERATING SINGLE- AND MULTI-RESERVOIR HYDROPOWER PLANTS submitted by MÜMTAZ AK in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Civil Engineering Department, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Gülbin Dural Ünver ____________________ Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. İsmail Özgür Yaman ____________________ Head of Department, Civil Engineering Assoc. Prof. Dr. Elçin Kentel Erdoğan ____________________ Supervisor, Civil Engineering Dept., METU Assoc. Prof. Dr. Seçil Savaşaneril Tüfekci ____________________ Co-Supervisor, Industrial Engineering Dept., METU Examining Committee Members: Prof. Dr. Ayşe Burcu Altan Sakarya ____________________ Civil Engineering Dept., METU Assoc. Prof. Dr. Elçin Kentel Erdoğan ____________________ Civil Engineering Dept., METU Asst. Prof. Dr. M. Tuğrul Yılmaz ____________________ Civil Engineering Dept., METU Prof. Dr. Serhat Küçükali ____________________ Civil Engineering Dept., Çankaya University Asst. Prof. Dr. Önder Koçyiğit ____________________ Civil Engineering Dept., Gazi University Date: 03.02.2017 I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work.
  • Powerpoint Timesaver Better Charts, Tables, and Diagrams for Better

    Powerpoint Timesaver Better Charts, Tables, and Diagrams for Better

    The Energy Sector: A Quick Tour for the Investor November 2013 Investment Support and ©2013 Deloitte Türkiye. Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited Promotion Agency of Turkey Disclaimer Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry Investment Support and Promotion Agency (ISPAT) submits the information provided by third parties in good faith. ISPAT has no obligation to check and examine this information and takes no responsibility for any misstatement or false declaration. ISPAT does not guarantee the accuracy, currency, reliability, correctness or legality of any information provided by third parties. ISPAT accepts no responsibility for the content of any information, news or article in the document and cannot be considered as approving any opinion declared by third parties. ISPAT explicitly states that; it is not liable for any loss, negligence, tort or other damages caused by actions and agreements based on the information provided by third parties. Deloitte accepts no liability to any party who is shown or gains access to this document. The opinions expressed in this report are based on Deloitte Consulting’s judgment and analysis of key factors. However, the actual operation and results of the analyzed sector may differ from those projected herein. Deloitte does not warrant that actual results will be the same as the projected results. Neither Deloitte nor any individuals signing or associated with this report shall be required by reason of this report to give further consultation, to provide testimony or appear in court or other legal proceedings, unless specific arrangements thereof have been made. All opinions and estimates included in this report constitute our judgment as of this date and are subject to change without notice and may become outdated.