DOCSLIB.ORG

Powerpoint Timesaver Better Charts, Tables, and Diagrams for Better

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Powerpoint Timesaver Better Charts, Tables, and Diagrams for Better The Energy Sector: A Quick Tour for the Investor November 2013 Investment Support and ©2013 Deloitte Türkiye. Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited Promotion Agency of Turkey Disclaimer Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry Investment Support and Promotion Agency (ISPAT) submits the information provided by third parties in good faith. ISPAT has no obligation to check and examine this information and takes no responsibility for any misstatement or false declaration. ISPAT does not guarantee the accuracy, currency, reliability, correctness or legality of any information provided by third parties. ISPAT accepts no responsibility for the content of any information, news or article in the document and cannot be considered as approving any opinion declared by third parties. ISPAT explicitly states that; it is not liable for any loss, negligence, tort or other damages caused by actions and agreements based on the information provided by third parties. Deloitte accepts no liability to any party who is shown or gains access to this document. The opinions expressed in this report are based on Deloitte Consulting’s judgment and analysis of key factors. However, the actual operation and results of the analyzed sector may differ from those projected herein. Deloitte does not warrant that actual results will be the same as the projected results. Neither Deloitte nor any individuals signing or associated with this report shall be required by reason of this report to give further consultation, to provide testimony or appear in court or other legal proceedings, unless specific arrangements thereof have been made. All opinions and estimates included in this report constitute our judgment as of this date and are subject to change without notice and may become outdated. Investment Support and ©2013 Deloitte Türkiye. Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 1 Promotion Agency of Turkey Table of Contents A. Executive Summary B. General Overview of the Energy Sector i. Overview of the Global Energy Sector ii. Investment Enablers of the Turkish Energy Market iii. Market Information C. A Closer Look at the Sub-sectors i. Electricity ii. Petroleum iii. Natural Gas & LNG iv. Coal D. Opportunities and Investment Areas Investment Support and ©2013 Deloitte Türkiye. Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 2 Promotion Agency of Turkey Glossary of Terms Acronym Definition Acronym Definition Independent Energy Exchange BCM Billion Cubic Meters EPİAŞ (to be established) BO Build Operate EU European Union BOT Build Operate Transfer EÜAŞ State-Owned Generation Company State-Owned BOTAŞ Natural Gas and Petroleum Pipeline Corporation FDI Foreign Direct Investment BRIC Brazil, Russia, India, China GDP Gross Domestic Product BSR Balancing and Settlement Regulation GW Gigawatt CAGR Compound Annual Growth Rate GWh Gigawatt Hours CCGT Combined Cycle Gas Turbine HEPP Hydroelectric Power Plant DisCo Distribution Company IEA International Energy Association EIU Economist Intelligence Unit IPP Independent Power Producer EML Electricity Market Law LNG Liquified Natural Gas EMRA (EPDK) Energy Market Regulatory Authority LPG Liquified Petroleum Gas European Network of Transmission System M&A Mergers and Acquisitions ENTSO-E Operators for Electricity Investment Support and 3 ©2013 Deloitte Türkiye. Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited Promotion Agency of Turkey Glossary of Terms Acronym Definition Acronym Definition MENR Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources TEDAŞ State-Owned Distribution Company MFSC Market Financial Settlement Center TEİAŞ State-Owned Transmission Company General Directorate MTA of Mineral Research and Exploration TETAŞ State-Owned Wholesale Company MVA Megavolt Ampere TKİ Turkish Coal Enterprises NG Natural Gas TOE Tons Oil Equivalent NGML National Gas Machinery Laboratory TOR Transfer of Operating Rights NGO Non-Governmental Organization TPAO Turkish Petroleum Corporation Organization OECD for Economic Co-operation and Development TTK Turkish Hard Coal Authority TÜBİTAK Scientific and Technological OSB Organized Industrial Zones Research Council of Turkey PMUM State-Owned Market Operator within TEİAŞ TÜİK Turkish Statistical Institute R&D Research and Development US$ United States Dollar REL Renewable Energy Law USDC Unit Service and Depreciation Charge TCE Ton Coal Equivalent VAT Value Added Tax Investment Support and 4 ©2013 Deloitte Türkiye. Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited Promotion Agency of Turkey Executive Summary • This report provides insights into the Turkish energy • The investment climate of Turkey has increasingly sector and aims to provide prospective investors become more welcoming to international investors, with a view of the sector with high-level analyses of making the country among the most important sub-sectors. investment destinations in the world. The energy sector alone has made 32% of the deal volume • Turkey is the 17th largest economy in the world and through privatizations and private sector the 6th largest in Europe with a GDP of approx. USD transactions in 2012. 786 billion in 2012. With an economic boom of 9.3% and 8.8% in 2010 and 2011 and a slow down to • Several incentives are available for both CAPEX and 2.2% in 2012, Turkey is expected to grow by 3.5% OPEX. Moreover, a significant amount of funds are in 2013, 4.9% in 2014, 5.1% in 2015, 5.0% in 2016 available for possible projects. Major Turkish and 4.9% in 2017. financial institutions see the value within the energy sector and are eager to invest in profitable new • As a fast-growing country, energy consumption in projects. Turkey is on the rise. The Turkish electricity market is one of the fastest growing in the world, with • The number of skilled labor is increasing as energy- approx. 9% annual growth on average, in 2010 and specific vocational schools and university 2011. Natural gas demand is expected to increase departments (both undergraduate and graduate) with a CAGR of 2.9% until 2020 according to the are being established in Turkey. The private sector’s Ministry of Energy and Resources. This growing involvement in the Turkish energy field started about demand calls for new investments. a decade ago, and those in this market are all seasoned professionals with noteworthy experience. • With the on-going liberalization process, the Turkish energy sector is becoming more vibrant and • Investment opportunities exist in almost all competitive, attracting the attention of more components of the value chain for electricity, natural investors for each component of the value chain in gas, oil and coal. all the energy sub-sectors. Investment Support and ©2013 Deloitte Türkiye. Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 5 Promotion Agency of Turkey B. General Overview i. Overview of the Global Energy Sector ii. Investment Enablers of the Turkish Energy Market iii. Market Information Investment Support and Promotion Agency of Turkey The demand for energy is constantly growing, keeping secure supplies at the forefront of our global agenda. Global Energy Demand (2011-2030) • Growing demand - driven by population and 12.000 industrial growth - in emerging markets calls for CAGR: an increase in the supply capacity as well as diversity in the energy generation mix. 1.64% 10.000 Diversification of primary energy supplies reduces dependency on a single source and contributes to mTEP supply security. 8.000 • Developing countries, including Turkey are expected to constitute 93% of the growth in 6.000 demand. • Global energy consumption will continue to 4.000 increase, with primary energy consumption having reached 12.4 million tons oil equivalent for an 2.000 increase of 1.8% in 2012. • Global oil consumption was 4.1 million tons in 2012 with an increase of 0.9% with respect to the 0 previous year. 2011 2015 2020 2025 2030 Non-OECD Source: BP Energy Outlook 2013 • World nuclear generation decreased in 2012: The OECD change in 2012 compared with 2011 was -6.9%. The Fukushima nuclear accident triggered the decrease in nuclear energy generation. This • Population and GDP growth are the two main factors situation also paved the way for renewables and affecting energy demand. The demand on global natural gas. energy dramatically increased 48% between 1990 and 2010. It is expected that global primary energy • According to IEA, shale gas caused a decline in gas demand will increase at a CAGR of 1.64% until prices, increasing the demand on natural gas and 2030, which will keep supply security on the agenda. LNG. Investment Support and ©2013 Deloitte Türkiye. Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 7 Promotion Agency of Turkey Turkey’s booming economy keeps energy – and the demand for energy - at the top of our agenda. • Over the past decade, demand in the Turkish • The Turkish electricity market is one of the fastest electricity market has been growing in line with its growing in the world, with an average of approx. 9% economic developments, driven by industrialization annual growth in 2010 and 2011. and urbanization. This situation together with • Similar to the electricity market, natural gas population growth expectations shows great consumption in Turkey is growing as well. Natural potential for further growth. gas consumption in Turkey reached approx. 46 bcm • Primary energy consumption between 2007 and in 2012 demonstrating an increase of 4.7% 2012 increased at a CAGR of 2%. According to the compared to the previous year. Natural gas demand Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), energy demand in is expected to grow by 2.9% annually until 2020 Turkey will increase at an annual rate of 4.5% until according to the Ministry of Energy and Resources. 2015 in alignment with the growth expected within • Distribution sales of gasoline, diesel oil and fuel oil the GDP. products increased by 3.8%, which corresponds to 18.2 million tons in 2012. Crude oil imports increased by 7% and reached 19.5 million tons in 140,0 1.500 2012. 120,0 100,0 1.000 • Turkey is still lagging behind the per capita energy 80,0 consumption indicator in comparison with the OECD 60,0 average, which shows that there is still more room 500 40,0 for further growth, in alignment with increasing per 20,0 capita GDP.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Cyprinus Carpio L., 1758) from Tercan Dam Lake, Eastern Anatolia, Turkey
    Erzincan Üniversitesi Erzincan University Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi Journal of Science and Technology 2020, 13(2), 609-619 2020, 13(2), 609-619 ISSN: 1307-9085, e-ISSN: 2149-4584 DOI: 10.18185/erzifbed.698577 Araştırma Makalesi Research Article Length-Weight Relationships and Fulton’s Condition Factor of Common carp (Cyprinus carpio L., 1758) from Tercan Dam Lake, Eastern Anatolia, Turkey Özge ZENCİR TANIR1* 1 Kemah Vocational School, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan-TURKEY Geliş / Received: 04/03/2020, Kabul / Accepted: 10/07/2020 Abstract In this study, length-weight relationships (LWR) and Fulton’s condition factor (K) values of totally 190 Common carp, Cyprinus carpio L., 1758 specimens, captured from Tercan Dam Lake between May 2017- October 2017, were examined. Sex composition was 41.58 % (n=79) female and 58.42 % (n=111) male. Female to male sex ratio of the population was found as 1:0.71. Fork length and weight values of overall, female and male specimens ranged from 11.2-55.5 cm/30.2-2860.5 g, 11.2-55.5 cm/30.2-2860.5 g and 12.7-47.5 cm/44.6- 1846.9 g, respectively. K values varied between 1.204 and 4.008. The average value of its was calculated as 2.155±0.041 for females, 2.138±0.046 for males and 2.148±0.030 for overall. The LWR were determined W= 0.0646*FL2.6613 for females, W=0.0389*FL2.8103 for males and W=0.0528*FL2.7202 for overall. The values of b was estimated as 2.66 (females); 2.81 (males); 2.72 in overall.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Keywords Distribution and Impacts of Carassius Species
    ISSN 1989‐8649 Manag. Biolog. Invasions, 2011, 2 Abstract Distribution and impacts of Carassius species (Cyprinidae) in Turkey: a review Biological invasions have caused considerable disruption to native Deniz INNAL ecosystems throughout the world through predation, habitat alteration, competition and hybridisation with Introduction, Hypotheses and species have been introduced in native species and introduction of Problems for Management Turkey as eggs, fry or fingerlings for diseases or parasites. Species of the different purposes over the last five genus Carassius [C. auratus (Linnaeus, In Europe, three species of the decades. Some of these fish have 1758), C. carassius (Linnaeus, 1758) and genus Carassius Nilsson 1832, are been used only in closed systems C. gibelio (Bloch, 1782)] were known; the goldfish, Carassius while others have been released transported to numerous inland water auratus (Linnaeus, 1758), the into open inland waters throughout bodies throughout Turkey. Species are crucian carp, Carassius carassius the country (Innal & Erk’akan 2006). now considered a threat factor for (Linnaeus, 1758) and the prusian Freshwater fish introductions may native species. The purpose of this (gibel) carp, Carassius gibelio (Bloch, result in impacts as a result of one study is to review the current 1782) (Ozulug et al. 2004). or many undesirable characteristics, distribution and ecological impacts of including: competition, habitat species in the inland waters of Turkey. Whereas C. carassius is alteration, parasitism, predation, native to Turkey, the other two hybridisation, alteration of habitat Keywords species of the genus Carassius were quality and/or ecosystem function, introduced to inland waters of host of pests or parasites (Copp et Carassius carassius, C.
    [Show full text]
  • The-Zebra-Mussel-In-Turkey-Report2.Pdf
    1 Report Name : The Zebra Mussel in Turkey Report No : 7 Prepared by Seyit Aksu,Dursun Yıldız ,Aysen Pervin Güngör Edited by Dursun Yıldız For citation : Aksu S.,Yıldız D.,Güngör P.A.,2017 "The Zebra Mussel in Turkey" .Report No: 7 Hydropolitics Association .Ankara-Turkey. --------------------------------------------------- © Copyright 2017 HPA,Ankara, Turkey. All rights reserved. No part of this report may be translated or reproduced in any form by print, photoprint, microfilm, or any other means without prior written permission of the Hydropolitics Association of Turkey. Güfte Sokak 8/9 06680 Kavaklıdere/Ankara/Turkey www.hidropolitikakademi.o 2 Contents Page Foreword ………………………...................................................................................4 CHAPTER I 1.1.Introduction ………………….. ……………………..................................................4 1.2. Spreading Areas in the World .................................................................................... CHAPTER II 2.1Zebra Mussel History……………………...............................................................11 2.2.Zebra Mussel Biology..................................................................................... 2.3.Zebra Mussels Effects.................................................................................. 2.3..1.Negative Effects of the Zebra Mussels on Hydro-Power Energy Generation CHAPTER III 3.1.Zebra Mussels Hıstory And Observatıons In Turkey......................................... 3.2.Spreading Areas in Turkey.................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How Zebra Mussels Threaten to Water Supply Security and Effects of Preventive Measures in Turkey
    Available online at www.worldscientificnews.com WSN 64 (2017) 99-126 EISSN 2392-2192 How Zebra Mussels Threaten to Water Supply Security and Effects of Preventive Measures in Turkey Seyit Aksu1, Dursun Yildiz2, Aysen Pervin Güngör3 1,3Hydropolitics Academy, Güfte Sok. 8/9 06680, Kavaklidere, Ankara, Turkey 2Hydropolitics Association, Güfte Sok. 8/9 06680, Kavaklidere, Ankara, Turkey 1-3E-mail address: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ABSTRACT Water mismanagement, overuse, unplanned and uncoordinated water management and climate change effects can be counted as emerging threats on renewable water resources and sustainable water use. These effects can also lead to a water supply security threats for the end user of water.In another words, water supply security is a very important part of the water security chains and directly depends on operational security of the water supply systems. Turkey has experienced with zebra mussels problems in Atatürk Dam and HEPP since 1997. Zebra Mussels accumulation has also created some problems in Birecik Dam in 2000. DSI (DG State Hydraulic Works) has started the site investigation on monitoring studies in Kesikköprü Dam and Atatürk Dam during years of 2001 and 2002. According to DSİ report (1), in Turkey, 629 small and large dams, 384 irrigation schemes, 98 water supply systems has been opened by State Hydraulic Works (DSİ) since 2005. Private sector has also built 510 river and canal type hydroelectric power plants since 2008. More than 100 small HEPP projects are under construction in different basins. About 550 small dams mainly for irrigation purposes are planned to built in near future.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Dams and Hydroelectric Power Plants Which Su-Yapi Has Participated Since 1975
    LIST OF DAMS AND HYDROELECTRIC POWER PLANTS WHICH SU-YAPI HAS PARTICIPATED SINCE 1975 PURPOSE SERVICES PROVIDED HEIGHT INSTALLED FROM ASSOCIATING NO. PROJECT NAME LOCATION DAM TYPE POWER YEAR PAST WORKED ON CLIENT & REMARKS FOUNDATIO FIRMS (MW) N (m) ENERGY IRRIGATION MISCELLANEOUS FEASIBILITY FINAL DESIGN DETAIL DESIGN CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION & CONS. BASIN MASTER PLAN TURKEY EARTH + 1GÜZELHİSAR DAM + 89 - + 1975-1978 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor İzmir ROCK FILL DOĞANCI DAM TURKEY 2 + ROCK FILL 82 - + 1975-1978 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor (Selahattin Saygı) Bursa TURKEY 3 KÜLTEPE DAM + EARTH FILL 42.7 - + 1976-1978 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Kırşehir TURKEY 4 İVRİZ DAM + + EARTH FILL 45 - + 1976-1978 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Konya TURKEY 5 SEVİŞLER DAM + EARTH FILL 65 - + 1977-1978 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Manisa TURKEY 6KALECİK DAM + ROCK FILL 80 - + 1977-1978 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Osmaniye 7 KIZILDERE DAM ++ TURKEY EARTH + 50 90 + 1975-1978 Diversion-Bottom Outlet, Spillway, INDIVIDUALLY & KÖKLÜCE HEPP Tokat ROCK FILL Energy Water Intake Structure, Energy Tunnel Excavation, Shoring DSİ, Contractor and Partial Coating, Surge Tank TURKEY EARTH + 8 KAYABOĞAZI DAM + 45 - + 1976-1979 Entire Dam Except the Body INDIVIDUALLY DSİ, Contractor Kütahya ROCK FILL ALTINKAYA DAM TURKEY Cofferdams, Diversion EPDC, SU-İŞ, 9 ++ ROCK FILL 195 700 + 1976-1979 DSİ & HEPP Samsun
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Energy Trading—A New Avenue for Resolving a Regional Water Dispute?
    International Journal of Water Governance-Issue 01 (2015) 49–70 49 DOI: 10.7564/14-IJWG46 Regional energy trading—a new avenue for resolving a regional water dispute? Waltina Scheumanna* and Sahnaz Tigrekb aGerman Development Institute E-mail: [email protected] bMiddle East Technical University E-mail: [email protected] The Coruh/Chorokhi river system is of great economic importance to both Turkey and Georgia because of its largely undeveloped but economically exploitable potential for hydropower. On both sides of the border a large number of hydropower projects are being implemented unilater- ally in which private investors play the key role, following liberalisation of the energy sectors in Turkey and Georgia. This has been promoted in both countries, despite the resulting social and environmental costs, particularly in Turkey. Negative effects – i.e., the changes in sedimentation and the river flow regimes – moving from upstream interventions in Turkey to downstream Georgia – have still not been resolved, and they will put electricity generation in Georgia at risk when the hydroelectricity plants start operating. This article explores regional disputes and the degree of cooperation that exists, and analyses the effect that the efforts of relevant actors to establish regional electricity trading are having on the current problems. The creation of a regional electricity market seems to be opening up a new avenue for cooperation also on water. Key words: Coruh/Chorokhi river system, unilateralism, hydropower, international disputes, regional electricity trade, potential for dispute resolution 1. A new way to solve negative effects on transboundary rivers? The body of literature dealing with conflicts and cooperation on transboundary riv- ers is overwhelming.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey's Transboundary Water Policy
    TURKEY’S TRANSBOUNDARY WATER POLICY: DOMINANCE OF THE REALIST PARADIGM? A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY FUNDA YAKAR IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN MIDDLE EAST STUDIES AUGUST 2013 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof.Dr. Meliha B. ALTUNIŞIK Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Özlem TÜR Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Dr. Süha BÖLÜKBAŞIOĞLU Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assist. Prof. Dr. Emre ALP (METU, ENVE) Prof. Dr. Süha BÖLÜKBAŞIOĞLU (METU, IR) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Oktay F. TANRISEVER (METU, IR) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Funda YAKAR Signature : iii ABSTRACT TURKEY’S TRANSBOUNDARY WATER POLICY: DOMINANCE OF THE REALIST PARADIGM? Yakar, Funda M.Sc., Department of Middle East Studies Supervisor : Prof. Dr. Süha Bölükbaşıoğlu August 2013, 109 pages Water is the most vital natural resource on the earth both for human and other species to survive. However, water is a scarce resource like other natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Structures of Salix Alba and Salix Excelsa Populations from Two Major River Systems in Turkey
    GENETIC STRUCTURES OF SALIX ALBA AND SALIX EXCELSA POPULATIONS FROM TWO MAJOR RIVER SYSTEMS IN TURKEY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY FUNDA ÖZDEMIR DEĞĠRMENCĠ IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN BIOLOGY NOVEMBER 2017 Approval of the Thesis: GENETIC STRUCTURES OF SALIX ALBA AND SALIX EXCELSA POPULATIONS FROM TWO MAJOR RIVER SYSTEMS IN TURKEY Submitted by FUNDA ÖZDEMİR DEĞİRMENCİ in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology Department, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Gülbin Dural Ünver _______________ Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. Orhan Adalı _______________ Head of the Department, Biological Sciences Prof. Dr. Zeki Kaya _______________ Supervisor, Biological Sci., METU Examining Committee Members: Prof.Dr. Musa Doğan* _______________ Biological Sci., METU Prof. Dr. Zeki Kaya _______________ Biological Sci., METU Prof. Dr. Hayri Duman _______________ Biology Dept., Gazi University Prof. Dr. Sertaç Önde _______________ Biological Sci., METU Asst. Prof. Dr. Fatih Temel _______________ Forest Engineering Dept., Düzce University Date: 27/11/2017 I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Funda Özdemir Değirmenci Signature : iv ABSTRACT GENETIC STRUCTURES OF SALIX ALBA AND SALIX EXCELSA POPULATIONS FROM TWO MAJOR RIVER SYSTEMS IN TURKEY Özdemir Değirmenci, Funda Ph.D., Department of Biology Supervisor : Prof.
    [Show full text]