DOCSLIB.ORG

Urban Strategies for Waste Management in Tourist Cities D2.7 – Compendium of Waste Management Practices in Pilot Cities and Best Practices in Touristic Cities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

URBAN‐WASTE – 690452 – D2.7 URBAN‐WASTE Urban strategies for Waste Management in Tourist Cities D2.7 – Compendium of waste management practices in pilot cities and best practices in touristic cities Grant Agreement No: WASTE‐6b‐2015 690452 Project Acronym: URBAN‐WASTE Project Title: Urban Strategies for Waste Management in Tourist Cities Horizon 2020: Eco‐Innovative Strategies: “Waste: a resource to recycle, reuse and Funding scheme : recover raw materials” Project Coordinator: Gobierno de Canarias (Government of Canary Islands) Start date of the project : 01/06/2016 Duration of the project: 36 months Contractual delivery date: 31/01/2017 Actual delivery date: 13/02/2017 Contributing WP: 2 Dissemination level: Public Editors: Gruber Iris Obersteiner Gudrun Contributing Authors: BJØRN OLSEN Trine, DE LUCA Claudia, ERIKSSON Mattias, GROßE Juliane, GRUBER Iris, KAZERONI Marie, KOVÁCS Erneszt, MAYERHOFER Johannes, OBERSTEINER Gudrun, RAMUSCH Roland, ROMEIN Arie, ZAPATA ARANDA Pilar The sole responsibility for the content of this report lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. Neither EASME nor the European Commission are responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein Abstract This report (Deliverable D2.7) refers to URBANWASTE Work Package 2, Task 2.8. Under this Task the current waste prevention and management practices in the URBANWASTE pilot cases are investigated and best practices coming from the EU context (focussing on touristic processes) are identified. This document shall support the selection of innovative strategies to be carried out within Work Package WP 4. A comparative policy review of national waste management strategies and targets in the European Union (EU) showed that there is no separate field of policies and instruments for waste generated by tourism neither on European level nor on the national level of EU member states. The identified waste prevention and management strategies already existing in the URBANWASTE pilot cities as well as international best practice examples can be allocated to well‐known policy instruments mainly based on information and awareness building as well as provision of infrastructure (e.g. bins for separate collection of food waste). But also regulatory instruments (e.g. ban of plastic bags), economic instruments and voluntary agreements (e.g. use of returnable containers) could be identified. Both, existing waste management and prevention practices in pilot cities as well as international best practices focus on nutrition of tourists. Most measures deal with food waste prevention as well as food waste management. The low‐waste organisation of events and the promotion of re‐use activities were also identified to be promising topics to reduce tourist waste generation. The promotion of resource consciousness in procurement amongst tourist accommodation establishments as well as food and beverage providers for tourists is another positive example identified. Most identified international best practice examples connected to tourist waste management refer to eco labelling and connected guidelines. The hotel industry can considerably reduce their waste generation by implementing and following a waste management system. One interesting knowledge gained from international best practice examples is the recommendation to elaborate an extended inventory of waste types and sources as first step for waste prevention measures. D2.7 – Compendium of waste management 2 practices in pilot cities and best practices in touristic cities Contributors NAME COMPANY CONTRIBUTIONS INCLUDE Iris GRUBER Johannes MAYERHOFER Universität für Bodenkultur Wien (BOKU) Chapters 1, 2, 4, 4.9, 4.11, 5 Gudrun OBERSTEINER Roland RAMUSCH Technische Universiteit Delft (Delft Arie ROMEIN Chapters 3 and 4.5 University of Technology) Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet – Swedish Mattias ERIKSSON Chapter 4.7 University of Agricultural Sciences Juliane GROßE University of Copenhagen Chapter 4.9 Fundo Regional para a Ciência e Gisela MC. NASCIMENTO Chapter 4.8 Tecnologia‐ FRCT Trine BJØRN OLSEN Aarhus University ‐ AU Herning Chapter 4.1 CE ‐ CONSULTA EUROPA PROJECTS AND Claudia DE LUCA Chapter 4.3 INNOVATION SL Pilar ZAPATA ARANDA Bioazul Contributing to chapters 4.9 and 4.11 Marie KAZERONI ORDIF ‐ Paris Region Waste Observatory Chapters 4.4, 4.6 and 4.10 ACR+ ‐ ASSOCIATION DES CITES ET DES Erneszt KOVÁCS REGIONS POUR LE RECYCLAGE ET LA Chapter 4.2 GESTION DURABLE DES RESSOURCES D2.7 – Compendium of waste management 3 practices in pilot cities and best practices in touristic cities List of abbreviations WMP Waste Management Plan MSW Municipal solid waste GPP Green Public Procurement D2.7 – Compendium of waste management 4 practices in pilot cities and best practices in touristic cities Table of Contents Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 10 Glossary ........................................................................................................................................ 14 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 15 2. Approach .............................................................................................................................. 16 3. Comparative Policy Review of National Waste Management Strategies and Targets in the European Union (EU) ..................................................................................................................... 17 3.1 Introduction: Why drawing attention to EU waste policies? ............................................... 17 3.2 EU waste policy framework ................................................................................................. 18 3.2.1 Changed approach to waste and waste policy ................................................................ 18 3.2.2 Strategies, policies, key policy documents and targets ................................................... 19 3.2.3 Significance of EU waste policy for national legislation on solid tourism‐related waste 21 3.3 Country summaries of municipal waste policies .................................................................. 21 3.3.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 21 3.3.2 Waste and waste management policies .......................................................................... 22 3.3.2.1 Group I ................................................................................................................................. 24 3.3.2.2 Group II ................................................................................................................................ 24 3.3.2.3 Reference Group .................................................................................................................. 25 3.3.3 Performance of waste management strategies .............................................................. 26 3.3.3.1 Generation of municipal waste ........................................................................................... 26 3.3.3.2 Landfilling ............................................................................................................................ 28 3.3.3.3 Recycling .............................................................................................................................. 30 3.4 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 32 4. Current Waste Prevention and Management Practices in Pilot Cities .................................... 34 4.1 Copenhagen (DK) ................................................................................................................. 35 4.1.1 Brief description of the URBANWASTE pilot case area ................................................... 35 4.1.2 Description of Waste Prevention Actions ........................................................................ 37 4.1.3 Description of Municipal Solid Waste Collection ............................................................ 39 4.1.4 Collection of Waste from Tourist Establishments ........................................................... 45 4.1.5 Description of waste from touristic ships ........................................................................ 45 4.2 Dubrovnik (HR) ..................................................................................................................... 46 4.2.1 Brief description of the URBANWASTE pilot case area ................................................... 46 4.2.2 Description of Waste Prevention Actions ........................................................................ 46 4.2.3 Description of Municipal Solid Waste Collection ............................................................ 46 4.2.4 Collection of Waste from Tourist Establishments ........................................................... 49 4.2.5 Description of waste from touristic ships ........................................................................ 49 4.3 Florence (IT) ......................................................................................................................... 50 4.3.1 Brief description of the URBANWASTE pilot case area ................................................... 50 4.3.2 Description
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2019

    Annual Report 2019

    Hovedstadens I Letbane Hovedstadens S Letbane I/S Annual Report Annual Report Hovedstadens Letbane I/S Metrovej DK- Copenhagen S CVR number: T + E [email protected] Read more about the Greater Copenhagen Light Rail at dinletbane.dk Cover visualisation: Gottlieb Paludan Architects Layout, e-Types Printing, GraphicUnit ApS ISBN number: ---- EMÆR AN KE V T S Tryksag 5041 0473 Annual Report 2019 Contents Foreword 05 2019 In Brief 06 Directors’ Report 08 Results and Expectations 08 Status of the Greater Copenhagen Light Rail 16 Design 22 Communication 23 Safety on the Right Track 25 Corporate Management 26 Compliance and CSR Report 27 Annual Accounts 35 Accounting Policies 36 Accounts 39 Management Endorsement 59 Independent Auditors’ Report 60 Appendix to the Directors’ Report 65 Long-Term Budget 66 3 The Light Rail will run under the viaduct at Buddingevej before continuing up to Lyngby Station. Visualisation: Gottlieb Paludan Architects Annual Report 2019 Foreword The Greater Copenhagen Light Rail will be 2019 was the year in which the Light Rail In May, the design of the coming Light Rail part of the public transport network that construction activities got underway and trains was decided on. The trains will be will enable residents, commuters and busi- the project became visible in several places green and will thereby have their own iden- nesspeople to get around in an easy, fast and along Ring 3. The major preparatory works tity in relation to the other modes of trans- more environmentally friendly way. When it at Lyngby Station, Buddinge Station and the port in the Greater Copenhagen area, while goes into operation, the Light Rail will run Control and Maintenance Centre in Glostrup also making it easy to spot the Light Rail in on electricity, which is one of the most en- picked up speed and utility line owners began the cityscape.
  • The Influence of Political Structures and Local Community Engagement on Placemaking in Train Stations a Case Study of Glostrup M

    The Influence of Political Structures and Local Community Engagement on Placemaking in Train Stations a Case Study of Glostrup M

    The influence of political structures and local community engagement on placemaking in train stations A case study of Glostrup Multifunctional Station Sustainable Cities Thesis Aalborg University of Copenhagen Mohammad Ghannam Study No. 2094407 Date: October 2th, 2019 Abstract Traditionally the development of a train station focuses on transportation manners for commuters. The challenge in modern train stations is the quality of the public space, which adds value to citizens through sustainable measures. It is crucial to strengthen participation for better development of train stations. There is a lack of involvement, and throughout the thesis, it is demonstrated that the argument is two- folded. The first one is local, about local development, inclusion, and achieving locally sustainable objectives. The other is about the system level. In order to handle the urbanization, new ways of governing are fundamental to achieve an optimal train station that comprehends all aspects of the transportation system. In a paradigm of transport where time-travel is at the center, there is not enough focus on the quality of the trip as a whole for people. The quality of the space is affected by the existing infrastructure that puts some limitations on the recreation of the place. Other challenging aspects of urban spaces, at the stations, are better transport modes, energy-efficiency, pollution reduction and policy framework. The focus on train stations is relevant for the development of sustainable cities since it offers quality of life, efficient connectivity, optimal and innovative use of public spaces and reduction of human footprint. The purpose of this thesis is to explore the influence of the political structure and the local community concerning strengthening placemaking in train stations.
  • At the Intersection of Research and Innovation

    At the Intersection of Research and Innovation

    Get Updated on the Largest Nordic Research and Development Project on Healthcare Technology AT THE INTERSECTION OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION Publisher: Patient@home Issue: 2000 Editor: Anders Lyck Fogh-Schultz, Layout: kreativgrafisk.dk Danish Technological Institute Print: Jørn Thomsen Elbo Photo: Emil Ryge 2 patient@home CONTENTS Foreword . 4 Grant Givers . 5 Patient@home Facts . 6 Monitoring . 8 Cases: Hospital Home ............................................... 10 Innovative Technology Used for Treatment of Wounds............. 12 Spiromagic .................................................. 13 Care in Own Home . 14 Cases: Exoskeleton for the Arm and Shoulder Region ................... 16 Detection and Identification of Body Fluid ....................... 18 Operating System for People with Reduced Cognitive Functions .... 19 Rehabilitative training . 20 Cases: Development of ReHApp ...................................... 22 Rehabilitation with Industrial Robots - Universal RoboTrainer ...... 24 Game Technology for Rehabilitation............................. 26 Patient@home Makes a Midway Evaluation . 28 Information and Knowledge Management . 32 Cases: Acquire-ICD ................................................. 34 Identification of High-Risk Patients............................. 36 DiabeticLink Denmark ........................................ 37 Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) . 38 Cases: Adaptive Software Platform for Telemedicine .................... 40 Fast-Track . 42 Cases: Google Glass-testing at OUH
  • Louis Poulsen Sustainabillity 20

    Louis Poulsen Sustainabillity 20

    Sustainability Report 2020 Louis Poulsen / Sustainabilty Report 2020 2 Louis Poulsen / Sustainabilty Report 2020 3 1. A year like no other 4 2. Louis Poulsen at a glance 8 3. Sustainability at Louis Poulsen 13 4. Sustainability in our solutions 26 5. Sustainable operations 40 5.1. Addressing our impact on the climate and the environment 43 5.2. Passionate employees are our most valuable asset 52 6. About this report 63 Louis Poulsen / Sustainabilty Report 2020 4 1. A year like no other Louis Poulsen / Sustainabilty Report 2020 5 1. A year like no other 2020 was a year defined by the global company, we developed and implemented proud to announce that our own produc- This Sustainability Report constitutes we gain throughout the process, we will COVID-19 pandemic, and from the very our Diversity Policy in 2020 to ensure tion facilities in Vejen, Denmark, are now our second annual Communication bring to the next chapter of the evolution beginning, protecting the health and diversity and equal opportunities for solely using renewable electricity as a on Progress to be submitted to the of Louis Poulsen, as we develop new wellbeing of our employees was our main everyone at Louis Poulsen. first step towards our ambitious target of UN Global Compact. We will continue products, new offerings and welcome priority – and it still is. our domestic operations being carbon to support and contribute to the new partnerships in the future. There is Sustainability as a strategic neutral by 2023. development of the principles of the no doubt that all the valuable knowledge With employees all over the world – from target area UN Global Compact and report on we are acquiring will impact and continue LA in the west to Tokyo in the east – we At Louis Poulsen, we know that a We have also been piloting new ways progress annually.
  • The Tenerife Property & Business Guide

    The Tenerife Property & Business Guide

    The Tenerife Property September 2017 & Business Guide Issue 155 Tel: 922 703 725 Email: [email protected] www.thetenerifepropertyguide.com Ref No: LUX 0265 Just one of the Price: €419,000 many beautiful properties exclusively for sale through Tenerife Island Rentals & Buy Tenerife Chayofa, Jardines Colgantes Estate Agents Sell, or Rent, your Property in BROADCASTING FROM an easy and efficient way. MASCA TO ARICO Tel: 922 793 960 WHEN IT´S ON, IT´S ON! See our main advert on page 24 WWW.POWERONFM.COM Professional upholstery 2 The Latest News September 2017 - Issue 155 · The Tenerife Property & Business Guide refunded if in the event your lawyer discovers Tenerife Island Rentals and Buy Tenerife is the first choice any legal anomaly to the said property. When for those looking for a residential property, either to rent the lawyer has completed the due diligence and long term, or to buy. It is also the number one choice for you are happy to proceed, the deposit will go owners wishing to optimise earnings on their properties, towards the 10% of the purchase price and either through rental or sale. the private purchase agreement will be Established in 2002, we specialise in long term satisfaction as regards the Once you have taken Once a sale has been prepared and signed. This rentals and sales, from studios, apartments, property’s amenities versus the decision to sell your agreed we will be able to is a legal document and townhouses, villas and rural properties those of competing rental property, one of our assist you with all aspects will contain: throughout all areas of Tenerife.
  • Ring 3 Letbane I/S Annual Report 2014 Contents Ring 3 Letbane I/S

    Ring 3 Letbane I/S Annual Report 2014 Contents Ring 3 Letbane I/S

    Ring 3 Letbane I/S Annual Report 2014 Contents Ring 3 Letbane I/S Herlev Annual Report 2014 Contents Contents 1.0 Welcome 4 2.0 Directors' Report 8 2.1 Result for the Year 10 2.2 Company Management 14 2.3 Social Responsibility 16 2.4 Construction of a light railway in Ring 3 18 3.0 Annual Accounts 22 3.1 Accounting Policies 24 3.2 Profit and Loss Account 27 3.3 Balance Sheet 28 3.4 Cash Flow Statement 30 3.5 Notes 31 4.0 Board of Directors of Ring 3 Letbane I/S 38 4.1 Board of Directors of Ring 3 Letbane I/S 40 5.0 Endorsements 42 5.1 Management Endorsement 44 5.2 The Independent Auditors' Report 45 6.0 Appendix to the Directors' Report 46 6.1 Long-Term Budget 48 The English text in this document is an unofficial translation of the Danish original. In the event of any inconsistencies, the Danish version shall apply. 3 Welcome Ring 3 Letbane I/S 1.0 Welcome Dear reader, 2014 was a decisive year for the coming The light railway from Lyngby to Ishøj light railway in Greater Copenhagen. The will intersect the S-train network, with Folketing (Parliament) adopted the Act departures every five minutes in daytime on a Light Railway, and the preparatory hours, ensuring passengers a faster and work commenced. The company that simpler journey across the various areas is to undertake the engineering design, of the capital. The municipalities along construction and operation of the light the light railway will have new opportu- railway was established, and the Board nities to develop urban quarters, attract of Directors began the work of setting new employers and create new commu- the framework for the coming light rail- nal and social facilities.
  • Proceedings of the International Collaborative Effort on Injury Statistics, Volume 1 National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD, (DHHS Publication No

    Proceedings of the International Collaborative Effort on Injury Statistics, Volume 1 National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD, (DHHS Publication No

    Proceedings of the International Collaborative Effort on Injur___y Statistics Volume II From the CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION/National Center for Health Statistics Melbourne Meeting: WOrking Papers U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics Hyattsville, Maryland September 1996 DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 96-1252 Preface The mission of the Injury ICE is to identify the problems and propose solutions aimed at improving the quality and reliability of international statistics related to injury. Following is a compilation °fthe working papers presented at the International Collaborative Effort (ICE) on Injury Statistics meeting held in Melbourne, Australia, February 23, 1996. The meeting was held in conjunction with the Third World Injury Conference. As co-Chair of the ICE, I served as the meeting's facilitator. An update on current projects was provided as were papers representing work in progress. A special thanks to James Harrison for serving as our host. This publication became a reality because of the efforts of Margaret Warner, who recently came to NCHS as a Fellow working on the ICE and other injury activities. Each of these papers was submitted on diskette. I accept responsibility for any errors found due to "technology" involved in delivering this product. Lois A. Fingerhut Chair, ICE on Injury Statistics Special Assistant for Injury Epidemiology Office of Analysis, Epidemiology and Health Promotion Meeting Participants: Name Affiliation Malka Avitzour Hadassah Medical Organization, School °fPublic Health Jerusalem, Israel MALKA•DALE.HADAS SAH. ORG. IL Vita Barell Ministry of Health, Tel Hashomer, Israel EPIDE06•CC S G.
  • When Riding the Bike, Everybody's Equal

    When Riding the Bike, Everybody's Equal

    When riding the bike, everybody’s equal OVERCOMING BARRIERS IN MINDS AND SOCIETY 8th International Together Against Stigma Conference Copenhagen, Øksnehallen September 21st, 2017 Bo Rasmussen – participant of the bicycle run Anja Kammacher – project manager A physical movement against stigma “The fact that people with a mental illness will get the idea of changing their lives by starting a bike ride, train up to this and define a goal to bike from Vestegnen [east of Denmark] to Skagen [north of Denmark]… There would be a lot of healthy persons who would find that prohibitive to set a goal like this. For the fund, that was worth to support” (Steffen Nørgaard, Director, The Fund of Spar Nord) Shared Care of Psychiatry THE PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT • An enhanced intersectoral collaboration of psychiatry of Vestegnen • A shared focus on health promotion and prevention of Diabetes and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (Psykisk sygdom og ændringer i livsstil, Vidensråd for Forebyggelse, 2012) Health promotion together COPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPEMENT • Seven municipalities • Course of health education • Mental Health Services - • Capital Region of Denmark Quit smoking – together • • General Practice Yoga • Cooking and eating together • Exercise in hot water pool • Service users of the psychiatry • Spinning • Employees • Etc. • Leaders og managers • Third sector • Private sponsors and companies The meeting where it all began And so we did… On the bike everybody’s equal • 4 users of of social psychiatry, Glostrup Municipality • 4 employees of social
  • Arona Tenerife, Spain

    Arona Tenerife, Spain

    WSEAS – NAUN CONFERENCE GUIDE Conference Location: Cleopatra Palace Hotel Address: Avenida de las Américas - Arona Tenerife, Spain Tel : (+ 34) 922 75 75 45 URL : http://www.marenostrumresort.com/en/cleopatra-palace-hotel/index.jsp How to get to Tenerife By Air: Tenerife Airport may refer to one of two airports on the Spanish island of Tenerife, in the Canary Islands: TFN Tenerife North Airport, also known as Los Rodeos Airport TFS Tenerife South Airport, also known as Reina Sofia Airport Tenerife Airport IATA Code: TFN Tenerife Airport IATA Code: TFS Tenerife Airport ICAO Code: GCXO Tenerife Airport ICAO Code: GCTS City: Tenerife City: Tenerife Country: Spain Country: Spain Address: Tenerife North Airport (TFN) Address: Aeropuerto de Tenerife Sur Reina Sofía (TFS), 38600 Aeropuerto Tenerife Norte, -S/n, 38297 San Cristobal De La Granadilla de Abona, Spain Lag una (Tenerife), Spain Source: http://www.prokerala.com/travel/airports/spain/tenerife-norte-airport.html Visa: Before you start planning your travel to Spain you should visit the Ministry of foreign affairs’ web page to see if you need to get a Visa. For more details: http://www.canadainternational.gc.ca/spain-espagne/cultural_relations_culturelles/entry-entree.aspx Access to the Hotel How to go from the airport to Mare Nostrum Resort To go from the airport to the Hotel, we recommend the transport offered by the Resort. The chauffeur will pick you up from the airport with a large comfortable car with the capacity for large suitcases, and if you come with your family, we also have mini-buses available, suitable for larger families.
  • Viesnīcu Adreses Tenerifē

    Viesnīcu Adreses Tenerifē

    VIESNĪCU ADRESES TENERIFĒ ADRESE REĢIONS KŪRORTS KATEGORIJA VIESNĪCAS OFICIĀLĀ VIESNĪCAS NOSAUKUMS NOVATOURS KATEGORIJA South Aguamar 3 3 Los Cristianos Tenerife Calle Albani, s/n, 38650 Los Cristianos, Santa Cruz de Tenerife South Allegro Isora 4 4 Playa de la Arena Tenerife Av. la Gaviota, 1, 38686 Playa, Santa Cruz de Tenerife South Av. de Bruselas, s/n, 38660 Costa Adeje, Santa Cruz de Tenerife Bahia del Duque 5 5 Costa Adeje Tenerife South Bahia Flamingo 3 3 Playa de la Arena Tenerife Av. la Gaviota, 3, 38683 Puerto de Santiago, Santa Cruz de Tenerife South Av. J.M. Galván Bello,Golf del Sur – San Miguel de Abona 38639, Santa Cruz de Bahia Principe Fantasia Tenerife 5 5 Golf del Sur Tenerife Tenerife South Barcelo Santiago 4 4 Los Cristianos Tenerife Calle la Hondura, 8, 38683 Santiago del Teide, Santa Cruz de Tenerif South Be Live Experience La Nina 4 4 Costa Adeje Tenerife Av. de España, s/n, 38660 Costa Adeje, Santa Cruz de Tenerife Be Live Experience Playa La South Arena 4 4 Playa de la Arena Tenerife Calle Lajial, 4, 38683 Puerto de Santiago, Santa Cruz de Tenerife North Be Live Experienve Orotava 4 4 Puerto de la Cruz Tenerife Av. Aguilar y Quesada, 3, 38400 Puerto de la Cruz, Santa Cruz de Tenerife Be Live Family Costa Los South Gigantes 4 4 Playa de la Arena Tenerife C/ Juan Manuel Capdevielle, 8, 38683 Puerto de Santiago, Santa Cruz de Tenerife South Best Jacaranda 4 4 Costa Adeje Tenerife Av. de Bruselas, 4-6, 38670 Costa Adeje, Santa Cruz de Tenerife South Calle Antonio Dominguez Alfonso, 6, 38660 Playa de la Américas,
  • Projekt-Steckbrief

    Projekt-Steckbrief

    Projekt wird teilfinanziert durch die Europäische Union. Projekt-Steckbrief Aufbau: National Contact Point, Hamburg Verantwortlich für die Inhalte: Die Projekte Letzte Änderungen am 30.07.2009 DIPOL Projektname Website: DiPol (Diffuse Pollution - Impact of Climate Change www.interreg- on the Quality of Urban and Coastal Waters) dipol.de Priorität Promoting the Sustainable Management of our Nr. 2 Environment Area of Intervention Adapting to and reducing risks posed to society and Nr. 2.3 nature by a changing climate Ziele und Inhalte DIPOL hat zum Ziel, die Auswirkung der bekannten Stichworte : Klimafolgen auf die Belastung von küstennahen Regionen Wasserqualität, durch Schadstoffe, Nährstoffe und pathogene Bakterien Küstenregionen, zu untersuchen, in Relation zueinander stellen, und Entscheidungshilfe, Schemata zu erarbeiten, wie Gesetzmäßigkeiten auf Kommunikation, andere Regionen zwischen Fluss und Meer übertragen Adaptives werden können. Damit soll eine Informationsgrundlage für Management politische Entscheidungsträger, Behörden und NGOs erarbeitet werden, die die Einbeziehung von bisher wenig beachteten aber möglicherweise stark nutzungs- relevanten Aspekten der Klimaveränderung in langfristige Planungen ermöglicht. Die regional betroffene Bevölkerung wird mit der Problematik diffuser Quellen durch Information und aktive Einbindung in das Projekt vertraut gemacht werden, damit potenzielle Maßnahmen gemeinsam entwickelt und getragen werden. Lead Beneficiary Technische Universität Hamburg Harburg (TUHH) Hamburg, Deutschland Deutsche(r)
  • Downloaded Fra Jurabibliotek.Dk09/30/2021 04:03:40PM Via Free Access Table of Cases

    Downloaded Fra Jurabibliotek.Dk09/30/2021 04:03:40PM Via Free Access Table of Cases

    Table of Cases Table of Cases Table of Cases Judgments of the Danish Courts (alphabetical) Arriva Skandinavien A/S vs. Danish Transport Authority. Danish weekly law reports 2007.2106H 602 Bent Mousten Vestergaard vs. Spøttrup Boligselskab. Danish weekly law reports 2002. 1297V, 76 Bredkjær Industri A/S vs. Municipality of Hals. Judgment of the Supreme Court of 30 April 1985, 602 Brunata A/S vs. Aalborg Boligselskab anno 1956. Jugment of the Western High Court of 6 March 2007 in case B-1923/05, 602 Dan Skoubo vs. Revisionsfirmaet Teddie Thulstrup A/S. Danish weekly law reports 2000.521H Danish Ministry of Taxation vs SP Moulding A/S. Judgement of 20 May 2009 in case BS 99-1556/2007, 600 EDs Secure Networks vs. Økonomi- og It- & Telestyrelsen. Judgment of the Supreme Court of 24 February 2011 555 European Metro Group vs. Ørestadsselskabet. Judgment of the Eastern High Court of 16 September 2002 (3rd div) in Case B-104-97, 296, 357, 600, 609 European Metro Group vs. Ørestadsselskabet. Judgment of the Supreme Court of 31 March 2005 (2nd div) in Case 428. Danish weekly law reports 2005.1799H, 463, 592, 599, 600 Copenhagen Business School and Ministry of Research vs. Højgaard & Schultz A/S. Judgment of the Eastern High Court of 16 August 2000 (5th div) in Case B-1654-97 and others, 277 County of Århus vs. Judex A/S. Judgment of the Western High Court of 16 March 2004 in the Cases B-2567-01 and B-1979-02, 588, 595, 600, 605 Humus/Genplast ApS vs.