Antimicrobials Amy J

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Antimicrobials Amy J Antimicrobials Amy J. Rankin Diplomate ACVO Associate Professor Ophthalmology Kansas State University Antimicrobial Agents • Interpretation of efficacy • Prophylactic vs therapeutic treatment • Antibacterial agents • Antifungal agents “Best” Antimicrobial • Legal • Efficacy • Safe – patient, owner, consumer • Available • Readily administered • Financial constraints Terminology • MBC-Minimum Bactericidal Concentration – Lowest concentration of an antibacterial agent required to kill a particular bacterium – Bactericidal -- MBC is no more than 4x the MIC • MIC-Minimum Inhibitory Concentration – Lowest concentration of an antimicrobial drug that will inhibit visible growth of a microorganism Terminology • Breakpoint in vitro – MIC used to indicate susceptible “S”, intermediate “I” or resistant “R” • MIC ˂ breakpoint – S • MIC > breakpoint – I, R – Chosen concentration of an antibiotic which defines whether a species of bacteria is susceptible or resistant to the antibiotic • Breakpoint in vivo – PK/PD = pharmacokinetics (what the body does to the drug) pharmacodynamics (what the drug does to the body) – Empirically based – Individual variation • Susceptible – Infection may be appropriately treated with the dosage regimen of an antimicrobial agent recommended for that type of infection • Intermediate – infection may be appropriately treated in body sites where the drugs are physiologically concentrated, or when a high dosage of a drug can be used • Resistant – Strains are not inhibited by the usually achievable concentration of the agent with normal dosage schedules and/or microbial resistance mechanisms likely T>MIC—optimize the duration of exposure (time-dependent) Cmax/MIC—maximize concentrations (conc.-dependent) Antimicrobial Agents • Concentration dependent – Effects are proportionate to concentration – Aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, & amphotericin B – GOAL: maximize concentrations Antibacterial Agents • Time-dependent – Killing capacity directly linked to exposure time – Includes bacteriostatic antibiotics – Beta-lactams & macrolides – GOAL: optimize duration of exposure https//u.osu.edu/beef/2017 Classification of Antibiotics Bacteriostatic Bactericidal • Chloramphenicol • Aminoglycosides • Macrolides • Bacitracin • Sulfonamides • Cephalosporins • Tetracyclines • Fluoroquinolones • Trimethoprim • Gramicidin • Penicillins • Polymyxin B • Vancomycin Antibacterial Agents • MOA – Cell wall synthesis – Cell membrane integrity – Protein synthesis – Folate metabolism – DNA synthesis • Gram positive • Gram negative – Thick cell wall – Outer membrane of LPS & phospholipids – Thinner cell wall www.onlinebiologynotes.com Inhibit Cell Wall Synthesis • Penicillins • Cephalosporins • Bacitracin • Vancomycin Penicillin • Thiazolidine ring & a β-lactam ring connected to a side chain Thiazolidine ring • 1928 Fleming • 1940 drug isolated • Side chain – PK Side chain β-lactam – Spectrum – Susceptibility to destruction • β-lactam ring – Binds transpeptidase and inhibits formation of peptidoglycan Mechanism of Action Penicillins Resistance to Penicillins • Bacteria – Alter their transpeptidases (PBP) – Decreased penetration of outer cell membrane – **Production of β-lactamases • Inactivate the β-lactam portion • Penicillinases subgroup of bacterial β-lactamases www.antimicrobe.org Penicillinase-Resistant Agents • Methicillin, oxacillin, cloxacillin, dicloxacillin, & nafcillin • Resist bacterial β- lactamases “Superbug” • Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) • Methicillin-resistant S. pseudointermedius (MRSP) • Oxacillin is used to test for this resistance • Altered PBP/transpeptides • MR Staphyloccus in dogs with keratitis – 4X more likely to be owned by healthcare worker – 23.5% dogs + nasal culture LoPinto et al., Vet Ophthalmol, 2015 www.steemkr.com β-lactamase Inhibitors • Bind to β–lactamase enzyme (irreversible/noncompetitive) • “Suicide inhibitors” • Always combined with another β-lactam antibiotic Riviere & Papich, Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 10 Ed. Clavamox® • Amoxicillin-clavulanate – Extends spectrum of amoxicillin to include β- lactamase-producing bacteria – 4:1 ratio of amoxicillin:clavulanate – Augmentin 4:1 or 7:1 ratio Drug Route Spectrum Drawback Penicillin G parenteral Gm + Susceptible to Penicillin V po Gm + organisms that produce β- lactamase S. Aureus S. epidermidis Ampicillin Gm + & Gm - Inactivated by β- Amoxicillin Gm + & Gm - lactamase Carbenicillin Pseudomonas Mezlocillin aeruginosa Piperacillin Some Proteus & Ticarcillin Enterobacter sp. Gm - Cephalosporins • Dihydrothiazine and β-lactam ring connected to a side chain • Interfere with peptidoglycan cross-linking • β-lactam Side chain β-lactam – Antibacterial activity dihydrothiazine – Bind transpeptidase – Inhibit peptidoglycan formation • Side chain Side chain – Determines spectrum Cephalosporins • Resistance – Destruction by β-lactamases – Less susceptible than penicillins • S. aureus produces penicillinases • Gm – bacteria produce β-lactamases – Generation classification – Based on spectrum of activity Cephalosporin Generations First Second Third Fourth Cephalexin Cefamandole Cefoperazone Cefquinome Cephalothin Cefmetazole Cefotaxime Cefepime Cefadroxil Cefonicid Ceftazidime Cephapirin Cefprozil Ceftizoxime Cefazolin Cefotetan Ceftriazone Cephradine Cefoxitin Moxalactam Cefaparin Cefuroxime Cefixime Cefaclor Ceftiofur Cefpodoxime Cefovecin Cephalosporin Generations First Second Third Good Gm + activity Good Gm + activity Modest Gm + activity (except Enterococcus) Modest Gm - activity Improved Gm - activity Improved Gm – activity (enteric bacteria) Cefazolin has greatest Increased resistance to Ceftazidime- Gm - activity β-lactamases Pseudomonas aeruginosa Penicillins and Cephalosporins • Not commercially available topically • Compound cefazolin 5% solution • Systemic administration – Adnexal disease – Orbital disease • Wang et al, Vet Ophtho, 2009 • 100% canine isolates-ceftiofur, ticarcillin • 78.3% canine isolates-Clavamox • 100% feline isolates-Clavamox, ampicillin, cefazolin cefpodoxime Bacitracin • Good Gm+ activity • Does not penetrate cornea • Not administered systemically due to nephrotoxicity • Inhibits movement of a peptidoglycan precursor from cytoplasm to cell wall www.faculty.ccbmd.edu Vancomycin • Glycopeptide (vancomycin, teicoplanin (Europe)) • Good Gm+ activity – Staphylococcus spp. (including MRSA),Streptococcus spp., Clostridium difficile, Enterococcus faecium & E. faecalis, Neisseria • Good Gm + anaerobic cocci – Not Gm – anaerobes • Increasing resistance to vancomycin among MRSA isolates Vancomycin • Ophthalmic use – Topical-infectious keratitis • First 2 hr after administration 0.52 µl/ml detected in AH • Therapeutic for most Gm + bacteria • Levels undetectable by 4 hours • Recommend 1 drop q 2 hr – Huerva et al., J Ocul Pharmacol, 1993 – Cystoid macular edema after cataract surgery • Vancomycin 10 µg.ml in the BSS irrigating solution • 55% of patients vs 19% in control group – Axer-Siegel, et al, Ophthalmolol, 1999 – Intravitreal injection-endophthalmitis Disrupt Cell Membrane • Polymyxin B • Gramicidin • Similarities btwn. bacterial and mammalian cell membranes limit systemic use Polymyxin B • Spectrum limited to Gm – – All Gm + resistant – Aerobacter, Escherichia, Histophilus, Klebsiella, Pasteurella, Pseudomonas, Salmonella, & Shigella – Proteus spp. and most Serratia spp. not effective • Not absorbed from GIT- administered IV • Poor penetration intact epithelium • Local hypersensitivity • Anaphylactic reaction-cats • Neurotoxic, nephrotoxic Gramicidin • Gr + spectrum • Forms membrane channel • Stable in solution • Causes hemolytic anemia if administered systemically www.nature.com David & Rajasekaran, J Kidney Cancer, 2015 Affect Bacterial Protein Synthesis • Aminoglycosides • Macrolides – Gentamicin – Erythromycin – Neomycin – Azithromycin – Tobramycin – Clarithromycin – Amikacin • Chloramphenicol – Kanamycin • Oxazolidinones • Tetracyclines – Linezolid Aminoglycosides • Irreversibly bind to receptor protein on 30S subunit • Disrupt initiation complex btwn mRNA and 30S subunit • Incorporation of incorrect aa in protein www.faculty.ccbcmd.edu Aminoglycosides • Poor oral absorption • Administered topically or parenterally • Strong Gm – activity – P. aeruginosa, Proteus, E. coli, Enterobacter... • Gm + efficacy restricted to S. aureus Aminoglycoside Toxicity • Nephrotoxicity – Concentrate in proximal tubule – Initial subclinical phase • Decreased urinary concentrating – Followed by azotemic phase – Risk factors • Dehydration, fever, old age, preexisting renal disease – If identified early aminoglycoside-induced renal injury can be reversed Aminoglycoside Toxicity • Ototoxicity/Vesibulartoxicity – Systemic aminoglycoside therapy (rarely topical) – Localization in hair cells, cochlea, spiral ganglion neurons, organ of Corti Aminoglycoside Toxicity • Neuromuscular blockade – Decrease the release of Ach – Decrease sensitivity of the end-plate to ACh – Increase clinical duration and time to recovery with neuromuscular blockers (atracurium vercuronium) with aminoglycosides Dupuis et al., Canadian J of Anaesthesia, 1989 Forsyth et al., Am J Vet Res, 1990 Aminoglycosides in Ophthalmology Topical Intravitreal • Neomycin • Gentamicin • Gentamicin – Chemical ablation • Tobramycin • Amikacin • Effects on cornea – Endophthalmitis treatment (may be – Delayed re- combined with epithelialization, punctate epithelial vancomycin to erosions, chemosis increase Gm + coverage) Plasma Concentration of Gentamicin • Post chemical ablation
Recommended publications
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0163484 A1 Heep Et Al
    US 200901 63484A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0163484 A1 Heep et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jun. 25, 2009 (54) PHARMACEUTICALS CONTAINING (30) Foreign Application Priority Data FLUOROQUINOLONES (75) Inventors: Iris Heep, Köln (DE); Kristine Mar. 8, 2006 (DE) ......................... 102O06O10642.3 Rigi,R. Dormagen Publication Classification (DE); Markus Edingloh, (51) Int. Cl. Leverkusen (DE) A 6LX 3/5.395 (2006.01) Correspondence Address: A63/496 (2006.01) BSER HEALTHCARE LLC A 6LX 3L/24709 (2006.01) P.O.BOX390 A6II 47/20 (2006.01) SHAWNEE MISSION, KS 66201 (US) A6IP3L/04 (2006.01) (73) Assignee: BAYER ANIMAL, HEALTH (52) U.S. Cl. ................. 514/229.2: 514/253.08: 514/300; GMBH, LEVERKUSEN (DE) 514/769; 514/772 (21) Appl. No.: 12/280,996 (57) ABSTRACT (22) PCT Filed: Feb. 23, 2007 The invention relates to pharmaceutical formulations in liq uid form, containing fluoroquinolones and antioxidative Sul (86). PCT No.: PCT/EP2007/001568 phur compounds. The formulations are particularly Suitable S371 (c)(1), for parenteral uses and are distinguished, interalia, by good (2), (4) Date: Oct. 31, 2008 tolerance. US 2009/0163484 A1 Jun. 25, 2009 PHARMACEUTICALS CONTAINING reconstitution, or must be discarded directly as the result of FLUOROQUINOLONES the possibility of particle formation. Accordingly, a ready-to use solution is advantageous as solution for injection. 0006. It is furthermore necessary that a suitable amount of the fluoroquinolone enters the serum after the administration, 0001. The invention relates to pharmaceutical formula as this is also described in WO99/29322. Again, this is not a tions in liquid form comprising fluoroquinolones and antioxi matter of course with injectable fluoroquinolone formula dant Sulphur compounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Trisindolyl-Cycloalkanes and Bis- Indolyl Naphthalene Small Molecules As Potent Antibacterial and Antifungal Agents
    Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Trisindolyl-Cycloalkanes and Bis- Indolyl Naphthalene Small Molecules as Potent Antibacterial and Antifungal Agents Dissertation Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) Vorgelegt der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät I Institut für Pharmazie Fachbereich für Pharmazeutische Chemie der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg von Kaveh Yasrebi Geboren am 09.14.1987 in Teheran/Iran (Islamische Republik) Gutachter: 1. Prof. Dr. Andreas Hilgeroth (Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Germany) 2. Prof. Dr. Sibel Süzen (Ankara Üniversitesi, Turkey) 3. Prof. Dr. Michael Lalk (Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald, Germany) Halle (Saale), den 21. Juli 2020 Selbstständigkeitserklärung Hiermit erkläre ich gemäß § 5 (2) b der Promotionsordnung der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät I – Institut für Pharmazie der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit selbstständig und ohne Benutzung anderer als der angegebenen Hilfsmittel und Quellen angefertigt habe. Alle Stellen, die wörtlich oder sinngemäß aus Veröffentlichungen entnommen sind, habe ich als solche kenntlich gemacht. Ich erkläre ferner, dass diese Arbeit in gleicher oder ähnlicher Form bisher keiner anderen Prüfbehörde zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades vorgelegt wurde. Halle (Saale), den 21. Juli 2020 Kaveh Yasrebi Acknowledgement This study was carried out from June 2015 to July 2017 in the Research Group of Drug Development and Analysis led by Prof. Dr. Andreas Hilgeroth at the Institute of Pharmacy, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg. I would like to thank all the people for their participation who supported my work in this way and helped me obtain good results. First of all, I would like to express my gratitude to Prof. Dr. Andreas Hilgeroth for providing me with opportunity to carry out my Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Antimicrobial Resistance in Companion Animal Pathogens in Australia and Assessment of Pradofloxacin on the Gut Microbiota
    Antimicrobial resistance in companion animal pathogens in Australia and assessment of pradofloxacin on the gut microbiota Sugiyono Saputra A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences The University of Adelaide February 2018 Table of Contents Thesis Declaration ...................................................................................................................... iii Dedication ................................................................................................................................. iv Acknowledgement ...................................................................................................................... v Preamble .................................................................................................................................... vi List of Publications ..................................................................................................................... vii Abstract .......................................................................................................................................ix Chapter 1 General Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Antimicrobials and their consequences ............................................................................ 2 1.2. The emergence and monitoring AMR................................................................................ 2
    [Show full text]
  • Fluoroquinolones in Children: a Review of Current Literature and Directions for Future Research
    Academic Year 2015 - 2016 Fluoroquinolones in children: a review of current literature and directions for future research Laurens GOEMÉ Promotor: Prof. Dr. Johan Vande Walle Co-promotor: Dr. Kevin Meesters, Dr. Pauline De Bruyne Dissertation presented in the 2nd Master year in the programme of Master of Medicine in Medicine 1 Deze pagina is niet beschikbaar omdat ze persoonsgegevens bevat. Universiteitsbibliotheek Gent, 2021. This page is not available because it contains personal information. Ghent Universit , Librar , 2021. Table of contents Title page Permission for loan Introduction Page 4-6 Methodology Page 6-7 Results Page 7-20 1. Evaluation of found articles Page 7-12 2. Fluoroquinolone characteristics in children Page 12-20 Discussion Page 20-23 Conclusion Page 23-24 Future perspectives Page 24-25 References Page 26-27 3 1. Introduction Fluoroquinolones (FQ) are a class of antibiotics, derived from modification of quinolones, that are highly active against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. In 1964,naladixic acid was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as first quinolone (1). Chemical modifications of naladixic acid resulted in the first generation of FQ. The antimicrobial spectrum of FQ is broader when compared to quinolones and the tissue penetration of FQ is significantly deeper (1). The main FQ agents are summed up in table 1. FQ owe its antimicrobial effect to inhibition of the enzymes bacterial gyrase and topoisomerase IV which have essential and distinct roles in DNA replication. The antimicrobial spectrum of FQ include Enterobacteriacae, Haemophilus spp., Moraxella catarrhalis, Neiserria spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1). And FQ usually have a weak activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Antibiotic Use Guidelines for Companion Animal Practice (2Nd Edition) Iii
    ii Antibiotic Use Guidelines for Companion Animal Practice (2nd edition) iii Antibiotic Use Guidelines for Companion Animal Practice, 2nd edition Publisher: Companion Animal Group, Danish Veterinary Association, Peter Bangs Vej 30, 2000 Frederiksberg Authors of the guidelines: Lisbeth Rem Jessen (University of Copenhagen) Peter Damborg (University of Copenhagen) Anette Spohr (Evidensia Faxe Animal Hospital) Sandra Goericke-Pesch (University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover) Rebecca Langhorn (University of Copenhagen) Geoffrey Houser (University of Copenhagen) Jakob Willesen (University of Copenhagen) Mette Schjærff (University of Copenhagen) Thomas Eriksen (University of Copenhagen) Tina Møller Sørensen (University of Copenhagen) Vibeke Frøkjær Jensen (DTU-VET) Flemming Obling (Greve) Luca Guardabassi (University of Copenhagen) Reproduction of extracts from these guidelines is only permitted in accordance with the agreement between the Ministry of Education and Copy-Dan. Danish copyright law restricts all other use without written permission of the publisher. Exception is granted for short excerpts for review purposes. iv Foreword The first edition of the Antibiotic Use Guidelines for Companion Animal Practice was published in autumn of 2012. The aim of the guidelines was to prevent increased antibiotic resistance. A questionnaire circulated to Danish veterinarians in 2015 (Jessen et al., DVT 10, 2016) indicated that the guidelines were well received, and particularly that active users had followed the recommendations. Despite a positive reception and the results of this survey, the actual quantity of antibiotics used is probably a better indicator of the effect of the first guidelines. Chapter two of these updated guidelines therefore details the pattern of developments in antibiotic use, as reported in DANMAP 2016 (www.danmap.org).
    [Show full text]
  • Convenia, INN-Cefovecin Sodium
    EMA/215997/2006 EMEA/V/C/000098 EPAR summary for the public CONVENIA cefovecin This document is a summary of the European Public Assessment Report. Its purpose is to explain how the assessment done by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP) on the basis of the documentation provided, led to the recommendations on the conditions of use. This document cannot replace a face-to-face discussion with your veterinarian. If you need more information about your animal’s medical condition or treatment, contact your veterinarian. If you want more information on the basis of the CVMP recommendations, read the Scientific Discussion (also part of the EPAR). What is Convenia? Convenia contains cefovecin, an antibiotic which is given by injection (under the skin). It is used for dogs and cats. There are two vials in each pack of Convenia, one vial containing a powder, and one vial containing the diluent. The powder is dissolved in the diluent before use to make up a solution for injection. What is Convenia used for? Convenia is used to treat infections caused by certain specific bacteria (see the SPC for further details). It is generally given as a single injection, and the effect of the injection lasts for up to 14 days. Depending on the infection concerned, the injection can be repeated if necessary (up to three times). Convenia is used in dogs to treat skin and soft tissue infections; these are infections on the skin and in the layers just below the skin, such as wounds, abscesses and pyoderma (a skin infection with a rash and pustules).
    [Show full text]
  • AMEG Categorisation of Antibiotics
    12 December 2019 EMA/CVMP/CHMP/682198/2017 Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary use (CVMP) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Categorisation of antibiotics in the European Union Answer to the request from the European Commission for updating the scientific advice on the impact on public health and animal health of the use of antibiotics in animals Agreed by the Antimicrobial Advice ad hoc Expert Group (AMEG) 29 October 2018 Adopted by the CVMP for release for consultation 24 January 2019 Adopted by the CHMP for release for consultation 31 January 2019 Start of public consultation 5 February 2019 End of consultation (deadline for comments) 30 April 2019 Agreed by the Antimicrobial Advice ad hoc Expert Group (AMEG) 19 November 2019 Adopted by the CVMP 5 December 2019 Adopted by the CHMP 12 December 2019 Official address Domenico Scarlattilaan 6 ● 1083 HS Amsterdam ● The Netherlands Address for visits and deliveries Refer to www.ema.europa.eu/how-to-find-us Send us a question Go to www.ema.europa.eu/contact Telephone +31 (0)88 781 6000 An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2020. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Categorisation of antibiotics in the European Union Table of Contents 1. Summary assessment and recommendations .......................................... 3 2. Introduction ............................................................................................ 7 2.1. Background ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Current Case of Quinolones: Synthetic Approaches and Antibacterial Activity
    molecules Review The Current Case of Quinolones: Synthetic Approaches and Antibacterial Activity Abdul Naeem 1, Syed Lal Badshah 1,2,*, Mairman Muska 1, Nasir Ahmad 2 and Khalid Khan 2 1 National Center of Excellence in Physical Chemistry, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Khyber Pukhtoonkhwa 25120, Pakistan; [email protected] (A.N.); [email protected] (M.M.) 2 Department of Chemistry, Islamia College University Peshawar, Peshawar, Khyber Pukhtoonkhwa 25120, Pakistan; [email protected] (N.A.); [email protected] (K.K.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +92-331-931-6672 Academic Editor: Peter J. Rutledge Received: 23 December 2015 ; Accepted: 15 February 2016 ; Published: 28 March 2016 Abstract: Quinolones are broad-spectrum synthetic antibacterial drugs first obtained during the synthesis of chloroquine. Nalidixic acid, the prototype of quinolones, first became available for clinical consumption in 1962 and was used mainly for urinary tract infections caused by Escherichia coli and other pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria. Recently, significant work has been carried out to synthesize novel quinolone analogues with enhanced activity and potential usage for the treatment of different bacterial diseases. These novel analogues are made by substitution at different sites—the variation at the C-6 and C-8 positions gives more effective drugs. Substitution of a fluorine atom at the C-6 position produces fluroquinolones, which account for a large proportion of the quinolones in clinical use. Among others, substitution of piperazine or methylpiperazine, pyrrolidinyl and piperidinyl rings also yields effective analogues. A total of twenty six analogues are reported in this review. The targets of quinolones are two bacterial enzymes of the class II topoisomerase family, namely gyrase and topoisomerase IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Belgian Veterinary Surveillance of Antibacterial Consumption National
    Belgian Veterinary Surveillance of Antibacterial Consumption National consumption report 2020 Publication : 22 June 2021 1 SUMMARY This annual BelVet-SAC report is now published for the 12th time and describes the antimicrobial use (AMU) in animals in Belgium in 2020 and the evolution since 2011. For the third year this report combines sales data (collected at the level of the wholesalers-distributors and the compound feed producers) and usage data (collected at farm level). This allows to dig deeper into AMU at species and farm level in Belgium. With a consumption of 87,6 mg antibacterial compounds/kg biomass an increase of +0.2% is seen in 2020 in comparison to 2019. The increase seen in 2020 is spread over both pharmaceuticals (+0.2%) and antibacterial premixes (+4.0%). This unfortunately marks the end of a successful reduction in antibacterial product sales that was seen over the last 6 years resulting in a cumulative reduction of -40,2% since 2011. The gap seen in the coverage of the sales data with the Sanitel-Med collected usage data increased substantially compared to 2019, meaning continuous efforts need to be taken to ensure completeness of the collected usage data. When looking at the evolution in the number of treatment days (BD100) at the species level, as calculated from the SANITEL- MED use data, use increased in poultry (+5,0%) and veal calves (+1,9%), while it decreased in pigs (-3,1%). However, the numerator data for this indicator remain to be updated for 2020, potentially influencing the reliability of the result.
    [Show full text]
  • NVA237 / Glycopyrronium Bromide Multinational, Multi-Database Drug
    Quantitative Safety & Epidemiology NVA237 / Glycopyrronium bromide Non-interventional Final Study Report NVA237A2401T Multinational, multi-database drug utilization study of inhaled NVA237 in Europe Author Document Status Final Date of final version 28 April 2016 of the study report EU PAS register ENCEPP/SDPP/4845 number Property of Novartis Confidential May not be used, divulged, published or otherwise disclosed without the consent of Novartis NIS Report Template Version 2.0 August-13-2014 Novartis Confidential Page 2 Non-interventional study report NVA237A/Seebri® Breezhaler®/CNVA237A2401T PASS information Title Multinational, multi-database drug utilization study of inhaled NVA237 in Europe –Final Study Report Version identifier of the Version 1.0 final study report Date of last version of 28 April 2016 the final study report EU PAS register number ENCEPP/SDPP/4845 Active substance Glycopyrronium bromide (R03BB06) Medicinal product Seebri®Breezhaler® / Tovanor®Breezhaler® / Enurev®Breezhaler® Product reference NVA237 Procedure number SeebriBreezhaler: EMEA/H/C/0002430 TovanorBreezhaler: EMEA/H/C/0002690 EnurevBreezhaler: EMEA/H/C0002691 Marketing authorization Novartis Europharm Ltd holder Frimley Business Park Camberley GU16 7SR United Kingdom Joint PASS No Research question and In the context of the NVA237 marketing authorization objectives application, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended conditions for marketing authorization and product information and suggested to conduct a post-authorization
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on the Efficacy and Corneal Penetration of Besifloxacin in Routine Cataract Surgery Cases
    A STUDY ON THE EFFICACY AND CORNEAL PENETRATION OF BESIFLOXACIN IN ROUTINE CATARACT SURGERY CASES Thesis submitted to THE TAMILNADU Dr.M.G.R. MEDICAL UNIVERSITY Chennai - 600 032. In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the award of the degree of MASTER OF PHARMACY in PHARMACY PRACTICE Submitted by Reg. No.: 261640151 DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACY PRACTICE PERIYAR COLLEGE OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES TIRUCHIRAPPALLI – 620 021. An ISO 9001:2015 Certified Institution SEPTEMBER – 2018 Dr. A. M. ISMAIL, M.Pharm., Ph.D., Professor Emeritus Periyar College of Pharmaceutical Sciences Tiruchirappalli – 620 021. CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the thesis entitled “A STUDY ON THE EFFICACY AND CORNEAL PENETRATION OF BESIFLOXACIN IN ROUTINE CATARACT SURGERY CASES” submitted by B. NIVETHA, B. Pharm., during September 2018 for the award of the degree of “MASTER OF PHARMACY in PHARMACY PRACTICE” under the Tamilnadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University, Chennai is a bonafide record of research work done in the Department of Pharmacy Practice, Periyar College of Pharmaceutical Sciences and at Vasan Eye Care Hospital, Tiruchirappalli under my guidance and direct supervision during the academic year 2017-18. Place: Tiruchirappalli – 21. Date: 10th Sep 2018 (Dr. A. M. ISMAIL) Dr. R. SENTHAMARAI, M.Pharm., Ph.D., Principal Periyar College of Pharmaceutical sciences Tiruchirappalli – 620 021. CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the thesis entitled “A STUDY ON THE EFFICACY AND CORNEAL PENETRATION OF BESIFLOXACIN IN ROUTINE CATARACT SURGERY CASES” submitted by B. NIVETHA, B. Pharm., during September 2018 for the award of the degree of “MASTER OF PHARMACY in PHARMACY PRACTICE” under the Tamilnadu Dr.M.G.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Staphylococcus Aureus Phage Lysate (SPL) Use for Control of Recurrent Eczematizing Pyoderma of Dogs with Atopic Dermatitis 2011 – by Dr
    RECURRENT PYODERMA IN DOGS WITH ATOPIC DERMATITIS YOU CAN CONTROL IT! READ HOW Staphage Lysate (SPL)® CAN HELP. A STAPHYLOCOCCAL BIOLOGIC REDUCES PRURITUS AND RECURRENCES OF INFECTION WORKS IN DOGS WITH MRSP AND MRSA REDUCES THE OVERUSE OF ANTIBIOTICS WHICH OFTEN LEADS TO ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS ALL NATURAL - HAS NO PRESERVATIVES FOR LONG-TERM CONTROL THE ANSWER IS Staphage Lysate (SPL)® To order Staphage Lysate (SPL)® CALL - 800 .562 .5541 FAX - 610 .543 .6298 EMAIL - [email protected] Abstract from Masters Thesis - Staphylococcus Aureus Phage Lysate (SPL) use for control of recurrent eczematizing pyoderma of dogs with atopic dermatitis 2011 – By Dr. Suzana Evelyn Bahr Solomon – Pontifica Universidade Católica do Paraná, São José dos Pinhais, Paraná, Brazil Recurrent staphylococcal infections are The aim of this study was to evaluate whether frequent in dogs with atopic dermatitis. the use of Staphylococcus aureus Phage Several factors such as decrease of epidermal Lysate (Staphage Lysate (SPL)®), a bacterin barrier function, decrease in production of obtained from S. aureus used in vaccine antimicrobial peptides and increased protocol, can minimize the symptoms colonization and adherence of bacteria to of recurrent pyoderma and increase the keratinocytes seem to combine to make interval between episodes in atopic dogs. bacterial pyoderma refractory to treatment. Twelve dogs with a history of recurrent Systemic antibiotic therapy in the short-term is bacterial pyoderma received SPL® at effective for the treatment of episodes and with increasing intervals for twenty three weeks. pulse therapy, might contribute to long-term An efficacy rate of 83.33% for the control control. However, in addition to undesirable of pruritus and regression of lesions was side-effects, microbial resistance has become observed.
    [Show full text]