Skyscraper Geography Donald Mcneill

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Skyscraper Geography Donald Mcneill Progress in Human Geography 29, 1 (2005) pp. 41–55 Skyscraper geography Donald McNeill Department of Geography, King’s College, London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK Abstract: This paper argues that geographers have tended to neglect the substantial impact of skyscrapers on urban life. Yet the significance of these buildings – in terms of height, levels of human occupancy, aesthetic impact and popular representation and use – is in need of careful geographical interpretation. Synthesizing work from a number of disciplines – geography, social history, architecture, planning, and cultural studies – it argues that the skyscraper is an extremely complex spatial phenomenon. First, the development and diffusion of skyscrapers as a global form is considered in terms of its geographical contingency, and the relational nature of its production. Secondly, the representational nature of the form in relation to cities is discussed, including attention to cinematic, biographical and everyday practices of representation. Thirdly, the volumetric nature of the skyscraper in urban form is briefly reviewed, focusing on its differing impacts on urban space and at various physical strata of the city. Taken together, there are important urban, political, social, cultural and economic debates that underpin this apparently regularized, rationalized built form. Key words: architecture, cinematic city, design, skylines, tall buildings, urban geography. I Introduction and urban planners all have good cause to consider as their own the presence of For the skyscraper is not only the building of the century, it is also the single work of these densely inanimate, yet vibrantly architecture that can be studied as the human, interventions in urban societies. Yet embodiment and expression of much that recent debates on the future of tall buildings, makes the century what it is ... For better or only given urgency by the attack on the for worse, it is measure, parameter, or World Trade Center, may benefit from apotheosis of our consumer and corporate culture. No other building type incorporates so insights drawn from various subdisciplines of many forces of the modern world, or has been human geography. These machines for so expressive of changing belief systems and so working in, these huge interruptions to responsive to changing tastes and practices. It place identity, these knots in a mesh of romanticizes power and the urban condition ... flows, these gargantuan footprints on the The tall building probes our collective psyche as it probes the sky. (Huxtable, 1984: 11) urban geography of the city are open to experiential, perspectival, sensual, locational Which discipline owns the skyscraper? Archi- and sociological phenomena that remain tectural theorists, social historians, engineers barely explored. © 2005 Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd 10.1191/0309132505ph527oa 42 Skyscraper geography In framing this discussion, I am not overly Trade Center site provided yet another twist: concerned with an enforced categorization. a skyscraper as monument and memorial. Some refer to the ‘tall building’ as opposed to The collapse of the WTC gave succour to a skyscraper. The fairly minimal definition those keen to herald the demise of the adopted by the most detailed compendium of skyscraper, who came from many political the skyscraper form – www.emporis.com – directions, from those who saw it as an details all buildings in the world over 35 abhorrent imposition upon the human scale of metres in height, giving a total of 85,350 cities, to those, such as Mike Davis, who see a at the time of writing (which includes 5158 geopolitics of capitalist fear at the heart of under construction, and 1402 demolished). urban decision-making in major cities: This website includes a table of the world’s 200 tallest skyscrapers (currently led by There is little doubt ... that bin Laden et al have put a silver stake in the heart of the ‘downtown Taipei), a skyline ‘impact’ index (led by Hong revival’ in New York and elsewhere. The Kong), and – most intriguingly perhaps – a traditional central city where buildings and table of skyscrapers by population size (led by land values soar towards the sky is not yet the Spanish resort of Benidorm). Perhaps dead, but the pulse is weakening. The current most significant, however, is that of the globalization of fear will accelerate the high- tech dispersal of centralized organizations, world’s 15 tallest buildings, only three are in including banks, securities firms, government the USA, and none are in Europe. In debates offices, and telecommunications centres, into over the future of urban form, existing regional multi-site networks ... In this spatial western-biased theories and models are of model ... satellite offices, telecommuting and, if questionable relevance. the need be, comfortable bunkers will replace most of the functions of that obsolete Furthermore, many of the arguments pre- behemoth, the skyscraper. (Davis, 2001: 44) sented below are concerned with the tall office building, and the sociology of work that Yet, while in the aftermath of the World attaches to that. However, many skyscrapers Trade Center attack doubt was cast on are, of course, apartment blocks, which can the future of the tall building in the city, it range from cramped, cheaply constructed soon became clear that, if anything, it stiff- forms of social housing to luxury condomi- ened the resolve of architects and developers niums. A substantial number of tall buildings to improve evacuation, fire and structural are occupied by hotels, where lofty aerial per- technologies. spectives become a commercial selling point. My argument in this paper is that geogra- Finally, there is a growing tendency among phy is well positioned to provide the holistic developers and policy-makers to favour interpretation of such materially substantial mixed-use developments, where office, hotel interventions in the urban context. The eclec- and residential uses are shared within one ticism of geography – with a corpus of theory building. on place identity (and the placelessness often Such insights give a flavour of the loca- associated with the skyscraper form), on the tional geography of the skyscraper, but, while relational geographies of financial and corpo- acknowledging the importance of aggregate real flow that provides a rationale for the statistics and rankings, it is clear that some existence of such structures, with an interest skyscrapers, some architects, and some sky- in urban form and city life, and with an under- lines are more discussed, represented and standing of the nature of everyday urban cognized than others. Here, the historical space and space usage – provides a series of emergence of tall buildings in certain key critical perspectives that might explain the cities – New York and Chicago, particularly – prevalence and significance of these struc- has established the form as a vernacular. tures. Yet, in Sorkin and Zukin’s (2002a) edited The debate over the rebuilding of the World collection, After the World Trade Center, only Donald McNeill 43 two of the contributors – Neil Smith and of specific, material spaces as being switching David Harvey – would be considered main- points or containers of people and techno- stream geographers, perhaps explicable by logies that are interconnected with other local factors in the case of this specific collec- similar spaces many miles distant. As with tion, but symptomatic of a wider issue. When airports and communication towers, sky- considering the materiality of the urban – how scrapers are obvious candidates for housing it is planned and designed, how it has evolved globalized flows, whether metaphorical or historically – a considerable amount of the material. Yet this ‘global’ history of the best work has been undertaken in other disci- skyscraper conceals a range of complex plines. In what follows, I make a call for relational geographies, from a conventional geographers to take a fuller interest in the sky- locational geography (the distribution of scraper, through three main bodies of work: tall buildings in the world’s cities), to a first, the literature on globalization, flow and mobile range of visual codes and corporeal mobility, which opens up a number of perspec- movements, to debates over the nature of tives on skyscrapers as an essential part of the transnationalism, global-local relations, and global economy and ecumene; secondly, the ideals of a ‘universal’ building style popular- relationship between the tall building and ized by the modernist movement. Within the ‘city’ as an identifiable place with its own economic geographies, the density of human identities, histories, myths and collective place occupation afforded by the skyscraper is narratives; thirdly, a discussion of the plasticity an important element of the modern eco- and multidimensionality of the urban experi- nomy. On the one hand, they are central ence. Much of the work reviewed in this points in the debate over ‘cities as sites’ of paper hails from outside geography, including both tacit and codified knowledge allowing social history, urban studies, film studies, soci- the kind of logistical access required to sustain ology and – of course – architectural history urban clusters, and often housing some of and criticism. However, it is my contention the ‘light institutions’ deemed significant to that a number of geography subdisciplines – the functioning of the contemporary eco- economic, cultural, political and of course nomy (Amin and Thrift, 2002: 53–77). This urban – could both enrich and be enriched by has been central to the relaxation of planning a greater sensitivity to this literature. controls on tall buildings in the City of London in recent years, for example II Relational geographies (McNeill, 2002). On the other hand: ‘once of skyscrapers we replace the idea of the city as a territorial economic engine with an understanding of 1 Skyscrapers, spatial stretching and cities as sites in spatially stretched economic urban ecologies relations, a rich ecology of urban life opens Relational links within and between cities are far up for consideration’ (Amin and Thrift, too multiple and complex, and far too mediated 2002: 63).
Recommended publications
  • Read Where Architecture Expert Paul Goldberg Comments on the History of New York's Famous Skyscrapers. As You Do So, Complete
    Can you identify any of these buildings? What do they all have in common? Which one do you like best? Read where architecture expert Paul Goldberg comments on the history of New York’s famous skyscrapers. As you do so, complete the following tasks: · In New York buildings are not only buildings, they become ___________________ · New York took over Chicago as regards skyscrapers in ___________________. · The Woolworth building was the tallest building worldwide for _________________. · The _______________ defined the Manhattan skyline. · They are trying to keep a memory of the people who were lost and also to show New York’s ______________________________. · New York stands out from the other cities as the embodiment of ____________________. Woolworth Building; Empire State Building; Chrysler Building; Flatiron; Hearst Tower The Woolworth Building, at 57 stories (floors), is one of the oldest—and one of the most famous—skyscrapers in New York City. It was the world’s tallest building for 17 years. More than 95 years after its construction, it is still one of the fifty tallest buildings in the United States as well as one of the twenty tallest buildings in New York City. The building is a National Historic Landmark, having been listed in 1966. The Empire State Building is a 102-story landmark Art Deco skyscraper in New York City at the intersection of Fifth Avenue and West 34th Street. Like many New York building, it has become seen as a work of art. Its name is derived from the nickname for New York, The Empire State. It stood as the world's tallest building for more than 40 years, from its completion in 1931 until construction of the World Trade Center's North Tower was completed in 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • College of Architecture and Planning Annual Report Academic Year 2008 – 2009
    COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING ANNUAL REPORT ACADEMIC YEAR 2008 – 2009 The word is out…. It is a true pleasure to submit this annual report. We have many success stories to report, and we certainly had a lot of fun working on those, but we also had substantial challenges; we all did. In our February issue of e-cap we acknowledged that “every challenge is an opportunity” and that creative minds are particularly well equipped to take advantage of such opportunities. Today we want to celebrate the fact that in spite of financial uncertainty we have been able to continue to move forward in an aggressive quest to take our college to the next level. A fundamental move in that quest has been to build a “dream team” for the college’s departmental leadership. Last fall we welcomed Prof. Mahesh Senagala as our new Chair in the Department of Architecture, this summer we have been blessed with the arrival of Prof. Michael Burayidi as our new Chair in the Department of Urban Planning, and before it gets too cold in January we will be joined by Professor Jody Naderi as our new Chair in the Department of Landscape Architecture. I don’t know of any other college of architecture and planning in the nation with a stronger leadership team. We have adopted the structure of our University’s Strategic Plan and in such a way promote integration and synergy through all our units. We invite you to review this report and share in our excitement and enthusiasm. This is a great time to be at CAP.
    [Show full text]
  • Hearst Tower Makes Dramatic Use of Light & Space
    Inside & out, Hearst Tower makes dramatic use of light & space. Welcome to Hearst Tower, Hearst’s global headquarters and the first New York City st landmark of the 21 century. Using the original 1928 Hearst International Magazine Building as his pedestal, noted British architect Norman Foster has conceived an arresting 46-story glass-and-steel skyscraper that establishes a number of design and environmental milestones. Hearst Tower is a true pioneer in environmental sustain- ABOUT HEARST ability, having been declared the first “green” Hearst Tower is home to employees office building in New York City history. of Hearst, one of the largest Inside and out, the design of Hearst Tower diversified media, information and makes dramatic use of light and space. The soar- services companies. Its major inter- ing three-story atrium—filled with the sound of ests span close to 300 magazines cascading water—creates a sense of calm on a around the world, including Cosmo- grand scale. The exterior honeycomb of steel politan, ELLE and O, The Oprah Mag- keeps the interior work areas uncluttered by azine; respected daily newspapers, pillars and walls, thus creating superb views of including the Houston Chronicle and the city from most vantages on the work floor. San Francisco Chronicle; television At night, with its radically angled panes of glass, stations around the country that Hearst Tower looks like a faceted jewel. reach approximately 19 percent of U.S. TV households; ownership in leading cable networks, including Lifetime, A&E, HISTORY and ESPN; as well as business information, digital services businesses and investments in emerging digital and video companies.
    [Show full text]
  • 20190304 Khee-Poh-Lam-CV.Pdf
    March 2019 School of Architecture College of Fine Arts Margaret Morrison Carnegie Hall 415 Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890, USA (t) 412.268.8503 (f) 412.268.6129 (e) [email protected] (w) soa.cmu.edu/khee-poh-lam Professor Khee Poh LAM Ph.D. ,Architect (UK), FRIBA Academic and Professional Qualifications Ph.D. (Architecture) Carnegie Mellon University, USA. 1994 Bachelor of Architecture (Hons) University of Nottingham, UK 1982 Bachelor of Arts (Architecture & Environmental Design)(Hons), University of Nottingham, UK. 1979 Registered Architect, Architects Registration Board, UK. 1984 Chartered Member, Royal Institute of British Architects, UK. 1984 Fellow, Royal Institute of British Architects, UK, 2016 Appointments 08-2018 Professor Emeritus College of Fine Arts, Carnegie Mellon University 2003-2018 Professor (Tenured) School of Architecture, Carnegie Mellon University 1998-2003 Associate Professor (joint appointment in the Department of Architecture and Department of Building, NUS since 2000) 1984-1998 Lecturer/Senior Lecturer School of Architecture, NUS 1982-1984 Architect, Nottinghamshire County Council Architects Department, County Hall, West Bridgford, Nottingham, NG2 7QP, UK. ________ 2016-2022 Provost’s Chair Professor of Architecture and Building School of Design & Environment, National University of Singapore 2015 Visiting Professor School of Design & Environment, National University of Singapore 2009-2015 Adjunct Professor School of Architecture, Chinese University of Hong Kong 2011-2014 Visiting Professor, Tsinghua University, Beijing,
    [Show full text]
  • Excerpts from the Accidental Skyline
    Excerpts from The Accidental Skyline A report by the Municipal Art Society of New York, December 2013 Full text (with images): https://www.mas.org/pdf/accidental-skyline-2013-12-20-web.pdf Executive Summary The size and scale of the as-of-right buildings going up on and around 57th St. deserve particular attention because of their proximity to Central Park. Individually, the towers may not have a significant effect; however their collective impact has not been considered… Central Park and New York City’s other open spaces are critical to the economic health of the city and to the well-being of its residents. The mixed skyline along the edges of Central Park is one of the park’s defining and most memorable features. The solution is not to landmark this skyline, but to find a way to ensure that the public has a voice when our skyline and open spaces are affected by new development and to require careful analysis to help inform the decision-making process… Based on the shadow studies MAS has produced, it is clear that the existing regulations do not sufficiently protect Central Park, nor do they provide a predictable framework for guiding development. Quite to the contrary, the existing regulations are producing buildings that have caught the public off- guard and have surprised regulators. A re-appraisal of the zoning around our key open spaces is needed to ensure that, as New York continues to develop, we are carefully considering the impacts of growth… Background Even a hundred years ago, New York City’s skyline was called, “the most stupendous unbelievable manmade spectacle since the hanging gardens of Babylon.” For over a century, the demand for land, advancing technology and intense ambition to create the tallest building in the world has transformed New York City’s skyline.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology Design
    ECOLOGY and DESIGN Ecological Literacy in Architecture Education 2006 Report and Proposal The AIA Committee on the Environment Cover photos (clockwise) Cornell University's entry in the 2005 Solar Decathlon included an edible garden. This team earned second place overall in the competition. Photo by Stefano Paltera/Solar Decathlon Students collaborating in John Quale's ecoMOD course (University of Virginia), which received special recognition in this report (see page 61). Photo by ecoMOD Students in Jim Wasley's Green Design Studio and Professional Practice Seminar (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee) prepare to present to their client; this course was one of the three Ecological Literacy in Architecture Education grant recipients (see page 50). Photo by Jim Wasley ECOLOGY and DESIGN Ecological by Kira Gould, Assoc. AIA Literacy in Lance Hosey, AIA, LEED AP Architecture with contributions by Kathleen Bakewell, LEED AP Education Kate Bojsza, Assoc. AIA 2006 Report Peter Hind , Assoc. AIA Greg Mella, AIA, LEED AP and Proposal Matthew Wolf for the Tides Foundation Kendeda Sustainability Fund The contents of this report represent the views and opinions of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the American Institute of Architects (AIA). The AIA supports the research efforts of the AIA’s Committee on the Environment (COTE) and understands that the contents of this report may reflect the views of the leadership of AIA COTE, but the views are not necessarily those of the staff and/or managers of the Institute. The AIA Committee
    [Show full text]
  • Linking Bioclimatic Theory and Environmental Performance in Its Climatic and Cultural Context – an Analysis Into the Tropical Highrises of Ken Yeang
    PLEA2006 - The 23rd Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Geneva, Switzerland, 6-8 September 2006 Linking bioclimatic theory and environmental performance in its climatic and cultural context – an analysis into the tropical highrises of Ken Yeang Puteri Shireen Jahnkassim1 and Kenneth Ip2 1 Department of Building Technology and Engineering, Kulliyyah of Architecture and Environmental Design, International Islamic University Malaysia. E-mail: [email protected] 2 School of the Environment, University of Brighton, United Kingdom. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: This paper presents the outcome of an environmental performance analysis and theoretical study into the bioclimatic highrises of Malaysian architect Ken Yeang – with a focus on the tropical climate. By focusing on case studies representing the three main phases of Yeang’s work, the impact of features such as core placement, sky courts, balconies, shading system and vegetation system are evaluated in terms of cooling and total energy use under the Malaysian climate. The climatic performances of the bioclimatic high-rise envelopes are then tested through comparisons with generic highrise forms. The study highlights the link between bioclimatic theories and climatic ‘performances’ and any conflicts between them. A paradox between theories based on critical regionalism and bioclimatic intentions are also described. Yeang’s designs are then evaluated in terms of overall forms rather than separate components. The study then focuses on the debate on critical regionalism and sustainable design, the balance of modernization and traditional values within the context of developing cities, and the significance of bioclimatic and critical regionalist theories in forming the basis of a sustainable architecture appropriate to its cultural and climatic context.
    [Show full text]
  • L-G-0013408524-0037547042.Pdf
    Guest-edited by YAEL REISNER ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN September/October 2019 Profile No 261 Beauty Matters 05/2019 Introduction About the Beauty in Guest-Editor Architecture Architecture and Beauty Not a Luxury – Yael Reisner Only a Necessity A Symbiotic Relationship Semir Zeki 05 Yael Reisner 14 06 Truth and Beauty The Return The Role of Aesthetics of Beauty in Mathematics and Physics Driving a Wedge Between Objects Robbert Dijkgraaf and Qualities 20 Graham Harman 26 Abstraction and Informality Generate a New Aesthetic Kazuyo Sejima & Associates, Nishnoyama House, Kyoto, Japan, An Interview with 2013 Kazuyo Sejima 30 Which Beauty Will Guide Us? Seeking a Refl ective, New Solids and Sustainable, Socially Massive Forms Engaged Visual Culture Izaskun Chinchilla Winka Dubbeldam and Emilio Luque 38 46 Beauty as Ecological Chromatic Intelligence Compositions Bio-digital Aesthetics as a Value Design Dissonance System of Post-Anthropocene and the Aesthetic Architecture of Fusion Archi-Tectonics, Claudia Pasquero and Marco Poletto Nannette Jackowski Inscape meditation space, and Ricardo de Ostos Chelsea, New York, 2016 58 52 ISSN 0003-8504 2 ISBN 978 1119 546245 Guest-edited by Yael Reisner The Geometry of Seduction The Primacy of Relationships and the Considerations of Beauty Reclamation of Beauty from Noun to Verb David A Garcia Jeanne Gang: Observed and Interviewed 74 Peter Cook Ambiguous, 66 Bipolar Beauty And Similarly Agile and A Specifi c Fragile Post-Digital Practices Theory of Models Marjan Colletti 90 The Posthuman Beauty of Weird Scales,
    [Show full text]
  • Green Cities Edited by Michael Lindfield and Florian Steinberg
    www.kargosha.com Urban Development Series Green Cities Edited by Michael Lindfield and Florian Steinberg November 2012 www.kargosha.com © 2012 Asian Development Bank All rights reserved. Published in 2012. Printed in the Philippines ISBN 978-92-9092-896-6 (Print), 978-92-9092-897-3 (PDF) Publication Stock No. BKK125129 Cataloging-In-Publication Data Lindfield, Michael and Florian Steinberg. Green cities. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2012. 1. Green cities. 2. Environmental management. 3. Asia. I. Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. ADB encourages printing or copying information exclusively for personal and noncommercial use with proper acknowledgment of ADB. Users are restricted from reselling, redistributing, or creating derivative works for commercial purposes without the express, written consent of ADB. Notes: In this report, “$” refers to US dollars. “Hong Kong” and "Taipei" refer to the entire urbanized area within Hong Kong, China and
    [Show full text]
  • Collaborative Modes of Practice: Incomplete Trajectories of Thinking Guiding a Practice
    Collaborative Modes of Practice: Incomplete trajectories of thinking guiding a practice. Ephraim Joris Master of Architecture 2008 Declaration I certify that except where due acknowledgement has been made, the work is that of the author alone; the work has not been submit- ted previously, in whole or in part, to qualify for any other academic award; the content of the thesis is the result of work which has been carried out since the official commencement date of the approved research program; and, any editorial work, paid or unpaid, carried out by a third party is acknowledged. Ephraim Joris 22-08-2008 Collaborative Modes of Practice: Incomplete trajectories of thinking guiding a practice. A catalogue submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Architecture Ephraim Joris School of Architecture and Design RMIT University October 2008 Contents Introduction; Mode, Nature and Tools The importance of history in the design of place The importance of climate in the design of place The importance of cognition in the design of place The importance of the collaborative practice Conclusion; The offset of a trajectory In short about myself; Bibliography Introduction; Mode, Nature and Tools Through the course of this research I looked at the mode of my practice considering the collaborative as an important instrument in the way I work as well as the nature of the work produced through this practice driven by contextual concerns and negotiated by a variety of design tools informing both my practice and my teaching. In my practice, this collaborative mode concerns the notion of the embedded practice as part of a wider interactive network of practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Public-Private Partnerships – Changing New York City's Skyline
    PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS – CHANGING NEW YORK’S SKYLINE New York State Bar Association Real Property Law Section Advanced Real Estate Topics 2016 December 12, 2016 Meredith J. Kane, Esq. Andrea D. Ascher, Esq. Partner Deputy General Counsel, Real Estate Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Metropolitan Transportation Authority Garrison LLP 2 Broadway 1285 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10004 New York, New York 10019 1 PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS – CHANGING NEW YORK’S SKYLINE A public–private partnership (PPP) is a cooperative arrangement among government agencies and private sector partners to undertake a complex large-scale development project, typically with a large infrastructure component. Governments have used such a mix of public and private arrangements in large-scale projects for years. In modern times, almost no private development project is done without public subsidy. Tax and interest rate subsidies, and land use policy, with its implicit subsidies, have played, and continue to play, a critical role in promoting and directing private development in New York City and New York State. For example, consider the roles of: Real Property Tax Incentives – J-51, 421-a, ICAP Multi-Family Housing Incentives: Tax-Exempt Bonds, Inclusionary Housing Zoning Bonuses Zoning Bonuses, Zoning Overrides, Zoning Special Districts (for Affordable Housing, Landmarks Preservation, Creation of Open Space) IDA Benefits for Commercial Tenant Retention and Relocation All of these mechanisms have been used variously in privately-sponsored projects having major public improvements, such as Atlantic Yards, Bank of America Headquarters, Columbia University Expansion and, most recently, One Vanderbilt. Similarly, almost no publicly-sponsored project in New York City is done without private developers – consider, for example, 42nd Street, Battery Park City, Hudson Yards, CornellTech Roosevelt Island, Queens West, World Trade Center, Fulton Center, the Moynihan Farley Post Office Building, Penn Station, and 347 Madison - MTA Headquarters Development.
    [Show full text]
  • Skyscrapers and the Skyline: Manhattan, 18952004
    2010 V38 3: pp. 567–597 DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6229.2010.00277.x REAL ESTATE ECONOMICS Skyscrapers and the Skyline: Manhattan, 1895–2004 Jason Barr∗ This article investigates the market for skyscrapers in Manhattan from 1895 to 2004. Clark and Kingston (1930) have argued that extreme height is a result of profit maximization, while Helsley and Strange (2008) posit that skyscraper height can be caused, in part, by strategic interaction among builders. I provide a model for the market for building height and the number of completions, which are functions of the market fundamentals and the desire of builders to stand out in the skyline. I test this model using time series data. I find that skyscraper completions and average heights over the 20th century are consistent with profit maximization; the desire to add extra height to stand out does not appear to be a systematic determinant of building height. Skyscrapers have captured the public imagination since the first one was com- pleted in Chicago in the mid-1880s. Soon thereafter Manhattan skyscrapers became the key symbol of New York’s economic might. Although the exis- tence and development of skyscrapers and the skyline are inherently economic phenomena, surprisingly little work has been done to investigate the factors that have determined this skyline. In Manhattan, since 1894, there have been five major skyscraper building cycles, where I define a “skyscraper” as a building that is 100 m or taller.1 The average duration of the first four cycles has been about 26 years, with the average heights of completed skyscrapers varying accordingly.
    [Show full text]