DOCSLIB.ORG

The Moundbuilders Ancient Peoples of Eastern North America 1St Edition Download Free

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Moundbuilders Ancient Peoples of Eastern North America 1St Edition Download Free THE MOUNDBUILDERS ANCIENT PEOPLES OF EASTERN NORTH AMERICA 1ST EDITION DOWNLOAD FREE George R Milner | 9780500284681 | | | | | Mound Builders Retrieved The Moundbuilders Ancient Peoples of Eastern North America 1st edition 19, This wide-ranging and copiously illustrated book, complete with information on dozens of sites to visit, is the perfect guide to the region for tourists, archaeologists, and students. One of these, Cahokia by the Mississippi, is the largest prehistoric site in the United States. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. It calls up the indefinite past. Pre-Columbian North America. Through the midth century, European Americans did not recognize that ancestors of the Native Americans had built the prehistoric mounds of the eastern U. Chapter 1, p. List of archaeological periods North America Mound Builders. He hath garnished the heavens; His hand hath formed the crooked serpent. For other uses, see Mound builder The Moundbuilders Ancient Peoples of Eastern North America 1st edition. Retrieved 5 September Squier and Edwin H. Authority control LCCN : sh Hopewellian peoples. September 25—30, ] ". Kailey rated it liked it Apr 16, The eyes of that species of extinct giants, whose bones fill the mounds of America, have gazed on Niagara, as ours do now. They believed that the massive earthworks and large ceremonial complexes were built by a different people. Inbunden Engelska, Javascript is not enabled in your browser. Between BC and the 16th century Native Americans built thousands of mounds, of all shapes and sizes and for a multitude of reasons, in the Eastern Woodlands. People also claimed that Native Americans were not the Mound Builders because the mounds and related artifacts were older than Native American cultures known by European Americans at that time. Overview Nineteenth-century explorers of the American continent were amazed to find great monuments built of earth in the Eastern Woodlands. Barbra rated it really liked it Mar 30, Population and cultural and political complexity increased, especially by the end of the Coles Creek period. He produced a series of watercolor paintings depicting scenes of native life. This is because the Native Americans encountered by the Europeans and European Americans were not thought to engage in metallurgy. Coles Creek and Plum Bayou cultures. To me, the most interesting aspect was how the construction of the mounds was linked with the transition between hunter-gather living This was a wonderful book. During the 20th century, certain sects affiliated with the Black nationalist Moorish Science philosophy theorized an association with the Mound Builders. Book Description Thames and Hudson, Community Reviews. Landon West of Pleasant Hill, O. Main article: Woodland period. The associated stone, metal, and clay artifacts were thought to be too complex for ancient Native Americans to have made. Books by George R. Living in an area with numerous Ojibway petroglyphs and rock paintings, I have an interest in the art and culture of the Eastern Woodland Indians. In a period ranging from BC Thousands The Moundbuilders Ancient Peoples of Eastern North America 1st edition these mounds were discovered in the plains and forestssome up to a hundred feet high, some overgrown hillocks, some conical, others flat-topped. Archaeology of the Mississippian culture: a research guide. Publisher: Thames and Hudson As George Milner shows, research over the past century demonstrates conclusively that Native Americans built these mounds. The Moundbuilders: Ancient Peoples of Eastern North America Some people attributed the mounds to mythical cultures: Lafcadio Hearn suggested that the mounds were built by people from the lost continent of Atlantis. Having a population of some 4, they occupied at least nine villages and were presided over by a paramount chiefknown as the Great Sun, who wielded absolute power. I am not really a student of archeology one college class and a passing interestbut the story told here was incredibly interesting, and just the right level for me. A New York Times article from described a mound in Wisconsin in which a giant human skeleton measuring over 9 feet 2. Authority control LCCN : sh Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Read more Between —, Hernando de Sotothe Spanish conquistadortraversed what became the southeastern United States. About George R. Seller Inventory thinkX. Although many of the The Moundbuilders Ancient Peoples of Eastern North America 1st edition traits of chiefdom societies were not yet made, by CE, the formation of simple elite polities had begun. There are no discussion topics on this book yet. In support of this startling claim the Rev. New York Times. Many different tribal groups and chiefdomsinvolving an array of beliefs and unique cultures over thousands of years, built mounds as expressions of their cultures. The Adena and Hopewell were not the only mound-building peoples during this time period. Not a casual read. Gibbon; Kenneth M. Christina Hall rated it it was amazing Jun 18, Welcome back. His large residence was built atop the highest mound, from "which, every morning, he greeted the rising sun, invoking thanks and blowing tobacco smoke to the four cardinal directions". Pre-Columbian cultures of North America that constructed various styles of earthen mounds. When Columbus first sought this continent The Moundbuilders Ancient Peoples of Eastern North America 1st edition when Christ suffered on the cross — when Moses led Israel through the Red-Sea — nay, even, when Adam first came from the hand of his Maker — then as now, Niagara was roaring here. Apr 01, Christopher Duston rated it it was amazing. Nov 02, Dejanira Dawn rated it it was amazing Shelves: college-booksmy-majorreads. Add to Wishlist. Barbra rated it really liked it Mar 30, Bobby rated it really liked it Sep 01, In that long — long time, never still for a single moment. The Moundbuilders Ancient Peoples of Eastern North America 1st edition Winterville and Holly Bluff Lake George sites in western Mississippi are good examples that exemplify this change of layout, but continuation of site usage. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Wikimedia Commons. Population and cultural and political complexity increased, especially by the end of the Coles Creek period. Upper Mississippi, or, historical sketches of the mound-builders, the Indian tribes and the progress of civilization in the North-west, from A. About the Author George R. These Black groups claim that the American Indians were too primitive to have developed the sophisticated societies and the technology believed necessary to build the mounds. Two thigh bones were measured with the height of their owners estimated at 14 feet 4. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Moundbuilders: Ancient Peoples of Eastern North America Numerous observers have suggested that the Book of Mormon appears to be a work The Moundbuilders Ancient Peoples of Eastern North America 1st edition fiction that parallels others within the 19th-century "mound-builder" genre that was pervasive at the time. When British colonists first arrived in America, they did not witness the Native Americans building mounds and these colonists reported that few Native Americans specifically referring to those Native Americans living in this area newly colonized by England on the Atlantic coast - knew of their own The Moundbuilders Ancient Peoples of Eastern North America 1st edition Having a population of some 4, they occupied at least nine villages and were presided over by a paramount chiefknown as the Great Sun, who wielded absolute power. Nov 02, Dejanira Dawn rated it it was amazing Shelves: college-booksmy-majorreads. Related Articles. For example, Caleb Atwater 's misunderstanding of stratigraphy caused him to believe that the Mound Builders were a much older civilization than known Native Americans. The focus, however, is on the cultures that built the mounds as burial mounds for thousands of bodies, often sacrificial victims, as platforms or as mounds of refuse built up over millennia, such as the large mound of nothing but shell that was discovered in Florida. This work is intended for the general public but nonetheless provides an excellent foundation for the reading of more academic books later. It calls up the indefinite past. Co[n]temporary with the whole race of men, and older than the first man, Niagara is strong, and fresh to-day as ten thousand years ago. Add to Basket. Sometimes the deceased king of this province is buried with great solemnity, and his great cup from which he was accustomed to drink is placed on a tumulus with many arrows set about it. Never dried, never froze, never slept, never rested. Buy New Learn more about this copy. Late Woodland period List of archaeological periods North America. Read more There he encountered many different mound-builder peoples who were perhaps descendants of the great Mississippian culture. Sites inhabited by Plaquemine peoples continued to be used as vacant ceremonial centers without large village areas much as their Coles Creek The Moundbuilders Ancient Peoples of Eastern North America 1st edition had done, although their layout began to show influences from Middle Mississippian peoples to the north. One of the two Monte Sano Site mounds, excavated in before being destroyed for new construction at Baton Rouge, was dated at BP plus or minus years. The Adena and Hopewell were not the only mound-building peoples during this time period. Their food consisted mostly of fish and deer, as well as available plants. Thanks for telling us about the problem. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. Mounds State Park. Apr 01, Christopher Duston rated it it was amazing. This specific ISBN edition is currently not available. Related Genetic history Pre-Columbian era. These mound builders were organized; hundreds or even thousands of workers had to dig up tons of earth with the hand tools available, the soil had to be moved long distances, and finally, workers had to create the shape the builder had planned.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Burial Mounds in Europe and Japan Comparative and Contextual Perspectives
    Comparative and Global Perspectives on Japanese Archaeology Burial Mounds in Europe and Japan Comparative and Contextual Perspectives edited by Access Thomas Knopf, Werner Steinhaus and Shin’ya FUKUNAGAOpen Archaeopress Archaeopress Archaeology © Archaeopress and the authors, 2018. Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Summertown Pavilion 18-24 Middle Way Summertown Oxford OX2 7LG www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978 1 78969 007 1 ISBN 978 1 78969 008 8 (e-Pdf) © Archaeopress and the authors 2018 © All image rights are secured by the authors (Figures edited by Werner Steinhaus) Access Cover illustrations: Mori-shōgunzuka mounded tomb located in Chikuma-shi in Nagano prefecture, Japan, by Werner Steinhaus (above) Magdalenenberg burial mound at Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany,Open by Thomas Knopf (below) The printing of this book wasArchaeopress financed by the Sainsbury Institute for the Study of Japanese Arts and Cultures All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Printed in England by Oxuniprint, Oxford This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com © Archaeopress and the authors, 2018. Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................................................................................................... iii List of authors .................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio History Lesson 1
    http://www.touring-ohio.com/ohio-history.html http://www.ohiohistorycentral.org/category.php?c=PH http://www.oplin.org/famousohioans/indians/links.html Benchmark • Describe the cultural patterns that are visible in North America today as a result of exploration, colonization & conflict Grade Level Indicator • Describe, the earliest settlements in Ohio including those of prehistoric peoples The students will be able to recognize and describe characteristics of the earliest settlers Assessment Lesson 2 Choose 2 of the 6 prehistoric groups (Paleo-indians, Archaic, Adena, Hopewell, Fort Ancients, Whittlesey). Give two examples of how these groups were similar and two examples of how these groups were different. Provide evidence from the text to support your answer. Bering Strait Stone Age Shawnee Paleo-Indian People Catfish •Pre-Clovis Culture Cave Art •Clovis Culture •Plano Culture Paleo-Indian People • First to come to North America • “Paleo” means “Ancient” • Paleo-Indians • Hunted huge wild animals for food • Gathered seeds, nuts and roots. • Used bone needles to sew animal hides • Used flint to make tools and weapons • Left after the Ice Age-disappeared from Ohio Archaic People Archaic People • Early/Middle Archaic Period • Late Archaic Period • Glacial Kame/Red Ocher Cultures Archaic People • Archaic means very old (2nd Ohio group) • Stone tools to chop down trees • Canoes from dugout trees • Archaic Indians were hunters: deer, wild turkeys, bears, ducks and geese • Antlers to hunt • All parts of the animal were used • Nets to fish
    [Show full text]
  • I. a Consideration of Tine and Labor Expenditurein the Constrijction Process at the Teotihuacan Pyramid of the Sun and the Pover
    I. A CONSIDERATION OF TINE AND LABOR EXPENDITURE IN THE CONSTRIJCTION PROCESS AT THE TEOTIHUACAN PYRAMID OF THE SUN AND THE POVERTY POINT MOUND Stephen Aaberg and Jay Bonsignore 40 II. A CONSIDERATION OF TIME AND LABOR EXPENDITURE IN THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS AT THE TEOTIHUACAN PYRAMID OF THE SUN AND THE POVERTY POINT 14)UND Stephen Aaberg and Jay Bonsignore INTRODUCT ION In considering the subject of prehistoric earthmoving and the construction of monuments associated with it, there are many variables for which some sort of control must be achieved before any feasible demographic features related to the labor involved in such construction can be derived. Many of the variables that must be considered can be given support only through certain fundamental assumptions based upon observations of related extant phenomena. Many of these observations are contained in the ethnographic record of aboriginal cultures of the world whose activities and subsistence patterns are more closely related to the prehistoric cultures of a particular area. In other instances, support can be gathered from observations of current manual labor related to earth moving since the prehistoric constructions were accomplished manually by a human labor force. The material herein will present alternative ways of arriving at the represented phenomena. What is inherently important in considering these data is the element of cultural organization involved in such activities. One need only look at sites such as the Valley of the Kings and the great pyramids of Egypt, Teotihuacan, La Venta and Chichen Itza in Mexico, the Cahokia mound group in Illinois, and other such sites to realize that considerable time, effort and organization were required.
    [Show full text]
  • Funnel Beaker Pottery in North-Eastern Hungary? in My
    Funnel Beaker pottery in North-Eastern Hungary? In my presentation, I would like to discuss an old find from a new perspective. In this sense, it is less of a presentation and more of a brief preliminary report of a research project in its initial phase. In the last two years, I undertook the critical re-assessment of the earlier excavated Late Copper Age Baden material from north-eastern Hungary. During this research, I noticed a curious, non-local, probably intrusive pottery sherd in the material from the Salgótarján– Pécs-kő site, whose cultural affiliation eluded me. I was only certain that it could not belong either to the Baden, or to the Kostolác culture. It was suggested that it could perhaps be assigned to Coţofeni or Bošáca, the well-known post-Baden groups bordering on the Baden distribution in Hungary, but in order to determine this, I had to consult other specialists, who would be able to confirm or refute my impression. Finally, with some trial and error, involving requests to colleagues in Transylvania regarding Coţofeni, and to colleagues in Slovakia regarding Bošáca, my Polish colleague, Prof. Marzena Szmyt finally suggested an acceptable cultural attribution, according to which the sherd should be assigned to the Funnel Beaker culture – however, the distribution of this culture did not extend to the territory of Hungary, and to the best of my knowledge, Hungarian archaeologists have not yet reported any Funnel Beaker finds from the Hungarian collections. First, let me describe the find in detail. Inventory number 60.1.496. Rim and body fragment of a decorated, thin-walled, wide- mouthed pot or bowl tempered with grog, gravelly sand and mica.
    [Show full text]
  • Burial Mounds & Cairns and the Development of Social Classes In
    THE DEAD AND THE LIVING: Burial Mounds & Cairns and the Development of Social Classes in the Gulf of Georgia Region by BRIAN DAVID THOM B.A., The University of British Columbia, 1992 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of Anthropology and Sociology) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA July 1995 © Brian David Thorn, 1995 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree -i that permission for extensive copying of this thesis ~for scholarly purposes may be "granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. i i Department of i/l/W^r I Sccc^Y The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada Date DE-6 (2/88) 11 Abstract This thesis provides a model for understanding how social classes arose in the Gulf of Georgia area. This model distinguishes how social status in rank and a class societies are manifested and maintained in non-state, kin-based societies, drawing mainly from ethnographic descriptions. The relationship between the living and the dead for making status claims in both rank and class societies makes the archaeological study of mortuary ritual important for investigating these relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Al Relations Between the Bosporus and Rhodes Are the Finds of the Work Of
    Acta Archaeologica Lodziensia nr 66 Vladimir Goroncharovskiy https://doi.org/10.26485/AAL/2020/66/1 THE MARBLE LION FROM LION TUMULUS NEAR KERCH TO THE QUESTION ABOUT SCULPTURES ON THE CIMMERIAN BOSPORUS ABSTRACT In this article the author presents a very rare find from the 1894 excavations of the so-called Lion Tumulus near Kerch. It is a huge marble statue of a lion, which is shown leaning on the head of a bull supported by its left paw. The Lion Tumulus is dated by an inscription to AD 14/15 and can be classified as a Royal tomb. Perhaps a rival of the Bosporan King Aspurgus in the struggle for the throne was buried there. Keywords: Bosporan Kingdom, Lion Tumulus, sculpture MARMUROWY LEW Z LWIEGO KURHANU KOŁO KERCZU. PRZYCZYNEK DO KWESTII RZEŹBY NA BOSPORZE KIMMERYJSKIM ABSTRAKT W prezentowanym studium autor analizuje znalezisko, dokonane w 1894 r. w trakcie wykopalisk na Lwim Kurhanie koło Kerczu. Odkryto tam marmurową rzeźbę lwa, opierającego łapę na głowie byka. Grobowiec, datowany jest, na podstawie znalezionej inskrypcji, na 14/15 r. n.e. Uznano go za grobowiec królewski. Możliwe, że pochowano w nim rywala króla Bosporu Aspurgosa. Słowa kluczowe: Królestwo Bosporańskie, Lwi Kurhan, rzeźba An additional aspect for the study of cultur- one another only in small details: the statue from al relations between the Bosporus and Rhodes are Rhodes is turned to the viewer’s left side, and the the finds of the work of Rhodian sculptors there.1 right, not the left, leg is supported by a pedestal. Until recently this consisted of a small statue of Also there are other finds which can be attributed to Aphrodite, the so-called Aphrodite of Taman.
    [Show full text]
  • Monks Mound—Center of the Universe? by John Mcclarey
    GUEST ESSAY Monks Mound—Center of the universe? By John McClarey hyperbole or a facsimile? I think the case can be made that Monks Mound and the entire Alayout of this ancient metropolis in the H American Bottom near East St. Louis was a facsimile or model of Cahokia’s place in the cosmos, similar to the Black Hills as a “mirror or heaven” or the heart of all that is.” These are good metaphors to describe Cahokia’s center in the three-layer cake concept of the universe—the Underworld, the Earth, and the Sky. Cahokia by the 12th century B.C.E., was the place for people to connect with the spirits of this sacred sphere. In this article I will identify the sacred elements that made this place special to local and non-local populations and the role of the Birdman chiefs, priests, and shamans to interpret this unique place as a center in a larger world. Additionally, I identify the similarities of Cahokia as a a sacred place to other societies at different times and places. My fascination with Cahokia Mounds developed over a period of time with many visits from the early 1970s to the present. Briefly, Cahokia was the largest America city north of Mexico before the coming of the Europeans in the 15th cen- tury. It is believed that Cahokia was a political, religious, and economic center for perhaps as many as 500,000 Indians in the Mississippi Valley. It was a planned city with everything the world and in all religions, but the focus here is on the laid out on the cardinal points on the compass, Monks Cahokia Mounds in southern Illinois and cross culture Mound, the largest mound at the center, served as the official comparisons, Cahokia’s unique story includes the cruciform residence of the Great Sun god or Birdman deity.
    [Show full text]
  • Archeology of the Funeral Mound, Ocmulgee National Monument, Georgia
    1.2.^5^-3 rK 'rm ' ^ -*m *~ ^-mt\^ -» V-* ^JT T ^T A . ESEARCH SERIES NUMBER THREE Clemson Universii akCHEOLOGY of the FUNERAL MOUND OCMULGEE NATIONAL MONUMENT, GEORGIA TIONAL PARK SERVICE • U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 3ERAL JCATK5N r -v-^tfS i> &, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fred A. Seaton, Secretary National Park Service Conrad L. Wirth, Director Ihis publication is one of a series of research studies devoted to specialized topics which have been explored in con- nection with the various areas in the National Park System. It is printed at the Government Printing Office and may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D. C. Price $1 (paper cover) ARCHEOLOGY OF THE FUNERAL MOUND OCMULGEE National Monument, Georgia By Charles H. Fairbanks with introduction by Frank M. Settler ARCHEOLOGICAL RESEARCH SERIES NUMBER THREE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR • WASHINGTON 1956 THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM, of which Ocmulgee National Monument is a unit, is dedi- cated to conserving the scenic, scientific, and his- toric heritage of the United States for the benefit and enjoyment of its people. Foreword Ocmulgee National Monument stands as a memorial to a way of life practiced in the Southeast over a span of 10,000 years, beginning with the Paleo-Indian hunters and ending with the modern Creeks of the 19th century. Here modern exhibits in the monument museum will enable you to view the panorama of aboriginal development, and here you can enter the restoration of an actual earth lodge and stand where forgotten ceremonies of a great tribe were held.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2016 in France: Chasing the Neolithic - Elly’S Notes
    June 2016 in France: chasing the Neolithic - Elly’s notes I had a conference in the middle of June in Caen, Normandy, and another the end of June in Ghent, Belgium. I rented a car in Paris and drove to Caen and then vacationed in Brittany among the spectacular Neolithic monuments that remain from 6500 years ago. I also saw family in The Netherland before going to Gent. The Brexit vote happened during my stay as did real conversations about the E.U., very different from before. One conference participant cancelled because he was ashamed to be British. Map of the first part of my trip, with the arrows pointing to some of the major areas I visited in France Normandy I spent four days in Caen, Normandy, which was a city much beloved by William the Conqueror and his wife Mathilde. Bayoux, with its famous carpet, is not far but I didn’t visit that. Both William and Mathilda built monasteries to convince the pope into ok-ing their marriage. Below are some pictures of Caen. Very little but interesting street art The city of churches A famous recipee from Caen but not for vegans And more street art The parking garage I had trouble getting out Many bookstores… of! After Caen, I visited Mont St Michel; its size is immense. Before the church was built, there had been a pointed rock – pyramid-like. To construct the church, they first built four crypts around the point and then put the church on the plateau formed that way. The building styles vary depending in which ages they were built: Norman, to Gothic, to Classic.
    [Show full text]
  • Megalithic Structures of the Northern Sahara (Chott El Jérid, Tunisia)
    Cartagine. Studi e Ricerche, 5 (2020) Sezione: Saggi e Studi Rivista della Scuola Archeologica Italiana di Cartagine Articolo presentato il 15/04/2020 http://ojs.unica.it/index.php/caster/index Accettato in data 09/05/2020 issn 2532-1110; doi: 10.13125/caster/4078 Pubblicato in data 21/05/2020 CaSteR, 5 (2020) Megalithic Structures of the northern Sahara (Chott el Jérid, Tunisia) Andrea Monaco1, LotfiBelhouchet 2, Hedi Bel Hadj Brahim3, Tarek Ben Fraj4, Jaâfar Ben Nasr5, Ridha Boussoffara2, Emanuele Cancellieri1, Moufida Jnen2, Enrico Lucci1, Rocco Rotunno1, Savino di Lernia1, 6 1Department of Ancient World Studies, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; 2Institute National du Patrimoine, Tunisia; 3Ar- tisanat du Sahara, Douz, Tunisia; 4Faculté des Lettres et des Sciences Humaines, Université de Sousse, Tunisia; Laboratoire de Cartographie Géomorphologique des Milieux, des Environnements et des Dynamiques (CGMED), Université de Tunis, Tunisia; 5Faculté des Lettres et des Sciences Humaines, Université de Kairouan, Tunisia; 6GAES, University of Witwaters- rand, Johannesburg, South Africa. corresponding author Savino di Lernia; mail: [email protected] 1. Introduction One of the distinctive archaeological features of the Sahara are the megalithic structures that in thousands punctuate the desert landscape as part of a larger phenomenon of Holo- cene North Africa. Stone monuments built to bury animals1, humans2 or exclusively as land- marks3, are found scattered over wide areas across the Sahara since the Middle Holocene, re- vealing a network of cultural connections among early pastoral communities. The typological variability of stone structures, reflecting a long chronological range and the local availability of raw materials, appears also to be correlated to their different functions.
    [Show full text]
  • New Discoveries and Documentation of Megalithic Structes in Juffain Dolmen Archaeological Field, Jordan
    Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, Vol. 18, No 1, (2018), pp. 175-197 Copyright © 2018 MAA Open Access. Printed in Greece. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1161357 NEW DISCOVERIES AND DOCUMENTATION OF MEGALITHIC STRUCTES IN JUFFAIN DOLMEN ARCHAEOLOGICAL FIELD, JORDAN Atef Shiyab1, Kennett Schath, Hussein Al-jarrah, Firas Alawneh2, Wassef Al Sekheneh1 1Faculty of Archaeology and Anthropology-Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan. 2Department of Conservation Science, Queen Rania Faculty of Tourism & Heritage, Hashemite University, P.O. Box 330127 Postal Code 13115 Zarqa, Jordan Received: 02/01/2018 Accepted: 02/02/2018 Corresponding Author: Firas Alawneh ([email protected]) ABSTRACT The research presented here is about documentation, analysis and sharing new discoveries of Juffain mega- lithic field. Using Geographic information system (GIS) to produce topographical maps is the basis for the conservation and the development of a Dolmen Heritage Park. A previous survey with Perugia University, was performed in 2016, which provide insight about the high density of megalithic structures and study of structure distribution. While collecting data for a topographical map, of the structural types there are two different categories, single and centers. Single structures are those that stand alone they are, D, Dolmens; TU, Tumulus; T, Tomb; PA – Patio, W – Wall, CA – Cave, CIS - Cistern, S – Silo, P – Press, QS – Quarry Stone, C – Circle and SS – Standing Stone. Five major stunning discoveries relating to the dolmen culture is found. In rank of Importance, here are the discoveries: (1) borders and boundaries, show that each of the dolmen groups stand alone, (2) domestic meeting places point to a sedentary society, (3) quarries and cup hole cen- ters demonstrate a high scale of distribution of central places, and (4) ritualistic centers indicates a higher level of human relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • A303 Stonehenge
    Track Winterbourne Stoke Down Def 112.0m Till Post Grain Drier Tumuli 100.000 120.9m Stone REFER TO INSET A FOR ROLLESTONE Sub Sta 110.9m Def Tank A360 Tanks Def Def Track Reservoir Pipeline Track JUNCTION THE PACKWAY Pipeline CF 120.6m Tumulus LB Track 112.4m THE 101.6m Tumulus Def FF 90.000 CROSSROADS CB Tumulus Memorial Tumuli Track Track 104.7m Def Track BB Track 142.0m MS Def Track N FF 104.8m Tumuli Foredown Barn Track S Baulk Tumulus The Coniger Track CF Drain N Tumuli CF Old King Barrows Und 112.5m 90.000 Def Tumuli S Baulk ED Bdy Und Tumuli Tumulus Camp REALIGNED A360 156.1m 100.000 Def Tumulus SEVEN BARROWS Tumulus Def Def Def Tumulus Tumulus Pond Track Track Pump House Pond The Avenue Drain River Till 91.4m Tumuli Und Tumulus A360 PC 103.3m Seven Barrows 100.000 90.000 Track THE AVENUE The Avenue Track Car Park Tumulus 92.0m A 360 A Def FF 105.7m REFER BELOW FOR MAINLINE FF PC Track WORLD Greenland Tumulus HERITAGE SITE The Avenue Stone Track Track Def Track Bungalow Deptford Down STONEHENGE MS FB ED Bdy Stonehenge Down Tumulus FB INSET A Track 105.7m Heel 90.9m Long Barrow ROLLESTONE JUNCTION Stonehenge Winterbourne Stoke Group 98.5m Und Def Tumuli 80.000 80.000 Tumuli Tumulus Tumulus 4000 Tumulus 152.1m Stonehenge Down 153.9m 110.6m S Baulk Def Def 77.4m FF Field System ED Bdy Def EXISTING A303 FF Down 90.000 90.000 Pump House CONVERTED TO BYWAY 3000 River Till 109.2m ED Bdy Def WESTERN TUNNEL Pump House Tumuli King Barrow WINTERBOURNE STOKE Def ENTRANCE Tumulus sites of Tumulus BARROW GROUP site of Def 80.000 A 303 Track
    [Show full text]