An Archaic Ivory Figurine from a Tumulus Near Elmali

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Archaic Ivory Figurine from a Tumulus Near Elmali AN ARCHAIC IVORY FIGURINE FROM A TUMULUS NEAR ELMALI: Cultural Hybridization and a New Anatolian Style Author(s): Tuna Şare Source: Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens, Vol. 79, No. 1 (January-March 2010), pp. 53-78 Published by: The American School of Classical Studies at Athens Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40835454 . Accessed: 18/03/2014 10:12 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The American School of Classical Studies at Athens is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 71.168.218.10 on Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:12:25 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions «ESPE..*7,uoio) AN ARCHAIC IVORY P"s"s"s FIGURINE FROM A TUMULUS NEAR ELMALI Cultural Hybridization and a New Anatolian Style To myfather, Arif Care ABSTRACT The extentof culturaland artistichybridization in ArchaicAnatolia is ex- ploredthrough close examinationof an ivoryfigurine of a motherwith two childrenfrom Tumulus D at Bayindir,near Elmali in southwesternTurkey. Alongwith other figurines from that tomb and fromArchaic Ephesos, this familygroup testifies to the late-Tth-century b.c. birthof a westernAnatolian stylein theminor arts that anticipates the Ionian stylein Greeksculpture. The authorsuggests that the figurines served as handlesof sacred implements and thatthey represent elite participants in thecult of an Anatoliangoddess, perhapsArtemis Ephesia. Amongthe remarkable archaeological discoveries of thepast century is an ivoryfigurine of a motherwith two children recovered from a tumulus adjacentto the village of Bayindir, near Elmali in Antalya province, south- westernTurkey (Figs. 1-4, below).1 Since its discovery in 1987,the group hasstimulated scholarly debate over its date, style, and the workshop that producedit, as well as theidentity of the figures itrepresents. The proposed datesfor the figurine range from the late 8th to theearly 6th century b.c. Somescholars consider the group to be theproduct of a Neo-Hittitework- shop,while others suggest an Ionian, Lydian, Phrygian, orLycian workshop; someidentify the figures as theAnatolian Kybele with her children, while othersidentify them as Letowith Apollo and Artemis.2 In thisarticle, I reevaluate the existing scholarship on thefigurine in lightof other figurines discovered in thesame tomb, as well as relatedmate- rialfrom Ephesos. I suggestthat the Antalya figurines were carved in an 1. AntalyaMuseum 2.21.87. This areowed to FahriI§ik, and to friends hereto referto theperiod ca. 700-480. articlederives from a case studyin my at ÇanakkaleOnsekiz Mart Univer- 2. The mainpublications concerning dissertation(Care, forthcoming). sity.I am also gratefulto theeditors of thisfigurine are Dörtlük 1988; Özgen I wouldlike to thankLarissa Hesperiaand to theanonymous review- and Özgen 1988;Akurgal 1992; Özgen Bonfante,John Kenfield, Clemente ers,whose suggestions improved this and Öztürk1996; Roller1999; Isik Marconi,Maya Vassileva,and Maya article. 2000; Boardman2000; and Börker- Muratovfor their inspirational support All datesare b.c. unlessotherwise Klähn2003. and helpfulcomments. Special thanks indicated.The term"Archaic" is used © The American School of Classical Studies at Athens This content downloaded from 71.168.218.10 on Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:12:25 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 54 TUNA CARE "Anatolian"workshop and exemplify the cultural and artistic amalgamation of Greekand local traditions that flourished in Anatoliaand developed intowhat art historians call the Ionian style. I alsoargue that the figurines functionedashandles of ritual implements, possibly distaffs orlibation cups, andthat they depict high-status participants in thecult of an Anatolian goddess,possibly Artemis Ephesia. I payspecial attention to the costumes ofthe figurines as evidence for religious and gender-specific roles and status inArchaic Anatolia. I beginby describing the figurine and its archaeological context. I then reassessthe figurine s date, style, and workshop of production; the iconogra- phyand identity of the subjects represented; the figurine's cult associations; itsfunction within the funerary context; and thepossible identity of the deceased.Adopting Ifik's label, I referto thisfigurine as AntalyaC.3 ANTALYA C IN CONTEXT TumulusD, fromwhich Antalya C wasunearthed, is one ofover a hun- dredsmall tumuli on the plain outside Bayindir. Only two of these tumuli, C andD, havebeen excavated systematically, both by Kayhan Dörtlük.4 Bothtumuli have revealed similar construction techniques: a burialpit sunkin thehardpan, enclosed within a woodenchamber, with the whole structurecovered by stones forming a mound. Interestingly, thecontents of - thetumuli represent different burial traditions cremation in Tumulus C andinhumation in Tumulus D.5 The woodenburial chamber in Tumulus D measures3.25 x 4.50 m andhas a floordecorated with pebbles.6 The skeletalremains of a female in herlate 20s laidout on a woodenkliney with her head facing east, were foundon the north side of the room.7 Surviving elements of the deceased s costumeinclude a largesilver belt over her waist, ten bronze fibulae over her chest,and nine silver fibulae found next to herchin. Scattered around the bodywere two small bronze cauldrons with bull protomes, ivory furniture appliqués(possibly from the k/ine), embossed silver plaques (possibly from a horses harness),and two iron horse bits.8 The easterncorner of the chamber yieldedanother silver belt and a largecauldron containing the remains of 3.Isik2000. tumuliare typical of Phrygian burial garmentof the deceased. Börker-Klähn 4. Dörtlük1988. tradition,the most famous example (2003,pp. 70-72), however,believes 5. Both tumuliare similarin size. beingthe so-called Tomb of Midas or thatthe silver plaques belong to a horse TumulusC is 36-38 m in widthand TumulusMM fromGordion; see Gor- saddle,a personalpossession of the 4.20 m in height(at thecenter); and dionI, pp. 79-102; Özgen and Öztürk deceasedwoman that was deliberately TumulusD is 40-45 m in widthand 1996,p. 32; Uçankus2002, pp. 287- damagedand renderedunusable at the 5.10 m in height.See Dörtlük1988, 338. timeof burial. She furthernotes that p. 172. 7. The woodenkline had virtually remainsof such saddles are known from 6. Not muchsurvived of the wooden disintegratedand theremains of the Phrygiantombs at Gordion.For golden wallsand theceiling. Eight postholes in deceasedhad fallento thefloor. appliquéssewn onto the garments, see thepebbled floor, 50 cm in depthand 8. The tumulusdid notcontain any Özgen and Öztürk1996, pp. 165-167, 22 cm in circumference,once held the equineskeletal remains. Almost all of nos. 115-119;for a representationofa supportsof the wooden roof. See Dört- theembossed silver plaques are perfo- dressdecorated with appliqués on a lük1988, p. 173.Wooden burial cham- ratedwith holes for attachment. Thus, 7th-centurymedallion, see Özgen and bersunderneath earthen and stone theymay be thesurviving parts of the Öztürk1996, p. 166,fig. 158. This content downloaded from 71.168.218.10 on Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:12:25 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions AN ARCHAIC IVORY FIGURINE 55 burnedceramics. Antalya C andthree more figurines, two of ivory and one ofsilver, were found in thesouthwest corner in a pileof objects including severalsilver and bronze omphalos cups (some plain, some with petaled decoration);bronze and silver bowls with swiveling ring handles attached to bolsters;a silverladle and a bronzeladle; small cauldrons of silver and bronzewith ring-handles orbull protomes; and a smallivory cup. Eleven ofthe metal vessels bear incised Phrygian names.9 AntalyaC, 17 cmin heightand 5.4 cmin width,offers a lively rep- resentationof a motherwith her two children (Fig. 1). The familygroup is carvedfrom a singlepiece of ivory. A rectangularhole at thetop of the mothers polos indicates that the figurine was originally attached to an object (Fig.2). The motherstands at thecenter on a shallowbase with her left footforward. She wears a one-piece,sleeved dress with a beltand a large circularcollar band at theneck. The dresshas decorativehorizontal and verticalbands; one ofthe horizontal bands forms the hem. The belthas incisionsimitating metalwork, recalling the two silver belts found in the sametumulus.10 Over the high polos the figure wears a veil,two corners ofwhich are brought to thefront and tucked into the belt; the veil is also heldin placeby a bandtied around the polos in typicalAnatolian fash- ion.11The dress,which responds to the forward movement of the mother s foot,is renderedlonger in thefront and shorterin theback and reveals thebacks of her ankles. Two straight chin-length locks of hair fall in front of herears. She wearsa beadednecklace arranged like a bead-and-reel molding,and spiral bracelets on bothwrists. The figurehas fullrounded cheeks,almond-shaped, slanting eyes, a largerounded nose, and full lips withan Archaicsmile. A smallgirl on theright stands
Recommended publications
  • Burial Mounds in Europe and Japan Comparative and Contextual Perspectives
    Comparative and Global Perspectives on Japanese Archaeology Burial Mounds in Europe and Japan Comparative and Contextual Perspectives edited by Access Thomas Knopf, Werner Steinhaus and Shin’ya FUKUNAGAOpen Archaeopress Archaeopress Archaeology © Archaeopress and the authors, 2018. Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Summertown Pavilion 18-24 Middle Way Summertown Oxford OX2 7LG www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978 1 78969 007 1 ISBN 978 1 78969 008 8 (e-Pdf) © Archaeopress and the authors 2018 © All image rights are secured by the authors (Figures edited by Werner Steinhaus) Access Cover illustrations: Mori-shōgunzuka mounded tomb located in Chikuma-shi in Nagano prefecture, Japan, by Werner Steinhaus (above) Magdalenenberg burial mound at Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany,Open by Thomas Knopf (below) The printing of this book wasArchaeopress financed by the Sainsbury Institute for the Study of Japanese Arts and Cultures All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Printed in England by Oxuniprint, Oxford This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com © Archaeopress and the authors, 2018. Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................................................................................................... iii List of authors .................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Funnel Beaker Pottery in North-Eastern Hungary? in My
    Funnel Beaker pottery in North-Eastern Hungary? In my presentation, I would like to discuss an old find from a new perspective. In this sense, it is less of a presentation and more of a brief preliminary report of a research project in its initial phase. In the last two years, I undertook the critical re-assessment of the earlier excavated Late Copper Age Baden material from north-eastern Hungary. During this research, I noticed a curious, non-local, probably intrusive pottery sherd in the material from the Salgótarján– Pécs-kő site, whose cultural affiliation eluded me. I was only certain that it could not belong either to the Baden, or to the Kostolác culture. It was suggested that it could perhaps be assigned to Coţofeni or Bošáca, the well-known post-Baden groups bordering on the Baden distribution in Hungary, but in order to determine this, I had to consult other specialists, who would be able to confirm or refute my impression. Finally, with some trial and error, involving requests to colleagues in Transylvania regarding Coţofeni, and to colleagues in Slovakia regarding Bošáca, my Polish colleague, Prof. Marzena Szmyt finally suggested an acceptable cultural attribution, according to which the sherd should be assigned to the Funnel Beaker culture – however, the distribution of this culture did not extend to the territory of Hungary, and to the best of my knowledge, Hungarian archaeologists have not yet reported any Funnel Beaker finds from the Hungarian collections. First, let me describe the find in detail. Inventory number 60.1.496. Rim and body fragment of a decorated, thin-walled, wide- mouthed pot or bowl tempered with grog, gravelly sand and mica.
    [Show full text]
  • Dress and Cultural Difference in Early Modern Europe European History Yearbook Jahrbuch Für Europäische Geschichte
    Dress and Cultural Difference in Early Modern Europe European History Yearbook Jahrbuch für Europäische Geschichte Edited by Johannes Paulmann in cooperation with Markus Friedrich and Nick Stargardt Volume 20 Dress and Cultural Difference in Early Modern Europe Edited by Cornelia Aust, Denise Klein, and Thomas Weller Edited at Leibniz-Institut für Europäische Geschichte by Johannes Paulmann in cooperation with Markus Friedrich and Nick Stargardt Founding Editor: Heinz Duchhardt ISBN 978-3-11-063204-0 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-063594-2 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-063238-5 ISSN 1616-6485 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 04. International License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Library of Congress Control Number:2019944682 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston The book is published in open access at www.degruyter.com. Typesetting: Integra Software Services Pvt. Ltd. Printing and Binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck Cover image: Eustaţie Altini: Portrait of a woman, 1813–1815 © National Museum of Art, Bucharest www.degruyter.com Contents Cornelia Aust, Denise Klein, and Thomas Weller Introduction 1 Gabriel Guarino “The Antipathy between French and Spaniards”: Dress, Gender, and Identity in the Court Society of Early Modern
    [Show full text]
  • Al Relations Between the Bosporus and Rhodes Are the Finds of the Work Of
    Acta Archaeologica Lodziensia nr 66 Vladimir Goroncharovskiy https://doi.org/10.26485/AAL/2020/66/1 THE MARBLE LION FROM LION TUMULUS NEAR KERCH TO THE QUESTION ABOUT SCULPTURES ON THE CIMMERIAN BOSPORUS ABSTRACT In this article the author presents a very rare find from the 1894 excavations of the so-called Lion Tumulus near Kerch. It is a huge marble statue of a lion, which is shown leaning on the head of a bull supported by its left paw. The Lion Tumulus is dated by an inscription to AD 14/15 and can be classified as a Royal tomb. Perhaps a rival of the Bosporan King Aspurgus in the struggle for the throne was buried there. Keywords: Bosporan Kingdom, Lion Tumulus, sculpture MARMUROWY LEW Z LWIEGO KURHANU KOŁO KERCZU. PRZYCZYNEK DO KWESTII RZEŹBY NA BOSPORZE KIMMERYJSKIM ABSTRAKT W prezentowanym studium autor analizuje znalezisko, dokonane w 1894 r. w trakcie wykopalisk na Lwim Kurhanie koło Kerczu. Odkryto tam marmurową rzeźbę lwa, opierającego łapę na głowie byka. Grobowiec, datowany jest, na podstawie znalezionej inskrypcji, na 14/15 r. n.e. Uznano go za grobowiec królewski. Możliwe, że pochowano w nim rywala króla Bosporu Aspurgosa. Słowa kluczowe: Królestwo Bosporańskie, Lwi Kurhan, rzeźba An additional aspect for the study of cultur- one another only in small details: the statue from al relations between the Bosporus and Rhodes are Rhodes is turned to the viewer’s left side, and the the finds of the work of Rhodian sculptors there.1 right, not the left, leg is supported by a pedestal. Until recently this consisted of a small statue of Also there are other finds which can be attributed to Aphrodite, the so-called Aphrodite of Taman.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Funerary Ceramics
    Harn Museum of Art Educator Resources Chinese Funerary Ceramics Large Painted Jar (hu) China Han Dynasty (206 BCE-220 CE) Earthenware with pigment 15 3/16 x 11 1/8 in. Harn Museum Collection, 1996.23, Museum purchase, gift of Dr. and Mrs. David A. Cofrin Ceramics have been an integral part of Chinese culture throughout its history. How they were fashioned, decorated and used reflected functional needs, cultural practices and spiritual beliefs. High quality ceramic vessels were created as early as the Neolithic period. By the time of the Han dynasty (206 B.C.E. - 220 C.E.), ceramics took many forms, from various types of vessels to figurative work. Surface decoration could take the form of relief, incision, painting, or glazing. Vessels were wheel- thrown, indicating high technical achievement. Many ceramic forms, it seems evident, were modeled on costlier metal prototypes. While ceramics undoubtedly served utilitarian functions, they were also used as funerary objects. During the Han dynasty, the Chinese often buried their dead with objects they would need in the afterlife. This ceramic jar was made for that purpose. Its painted design is intended to resemble lacquer, an extremely valuable material that was considered a sign of high status. Because it was prohibitively expensive for most families to bury the dead with actual lacquer vessels, ceramic replicas were used instead as a way of conserving financial resources for the living. The form and decoration of this jar are perfectly balanced. The painted decoration is intricate and expertly applied. The major theme, seen in the central band, is that of a dragon and a phoenix.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2016 in France: Chasing the Neolithic - Elly’S Notes
    June 2016 in France: chasing the Neolithic - Elly’s notes I had a conference in the middle of June in Caen, Normandy, and another the end of June in Ghent, Belgium. I rented a car in Paris and drove to Caen and then vacationed in Brittany among the spectacular Neolithic monuments that remain from 6500 years ago. I also saw family in The Netherland before going to Gent. The Brexit vote happened during my stay as did real conversations about the E.U., very different from before. One conference participant cancelled because he was ashamed to be British. Map of the first part of my trip, with the arrows pointing to some of the major areas I visited in France Normandy I spent four days in Caen, Normandy, which was a city much beloved by William the Conqueror and his wife Mathilde. Bayoux, with its famous carpet, is not far but I didn’t visit that. Both William and Mathilda built monasteries to convince the pope into ok-ing their marriage. Below are some pictures of Caen. Very little but interesting street art The city of churches A famous recipee from Caen but not for vegans And more street art The parking garage I had trouble getting out Many bookstores… of! After Caen, I visited Mont St Michel; its size is immense. Before the church was built, there had been a pointed rock – pyramid-like. To construct the church, they first built four crypts around the point and then put the church on the plateau formed that way. The building styles vary depending in which ages they were built: Norman, to Gothic, to Classic.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-64441-0 - The Roman Imperial Mausoleum in Late Antiquity Mark J. Johnson Excerpt More information Introduction Of all the building projects undertaken by Roman emperors during the course of their individual reigns, none elicited more personal interest than their own funerary monuments. In the later Roman Empire, as it had been earlier, these were buildings destined to provide a secure resting place for their mortal remains and a site of cult practices. The monuments were meant to project an image of majesty and importance for all others to see, for these were, in fact, sepulcra divorum, tombs of the divi, or demigods, an honor reserved for emperors. The mausolea of the emperors and members of their families thus constitute one of the most conspicuous groups of buildings in late Roman and Early Christian architecture, some of which are well-preserved, whereas others are now in ruins or known solely from literary sources. These monuments are among the period’s most important examples of funerary architecture, a form that was as innovative and varied as it was ubiquitous in the empire. Previous to the present study, these buildings have never been examined as a group, with two exceptions – a brief article that consisted of little more than an annotated list of monuments, and a slim volume that provides an overview of Roman imperial funerals and monuments.1 Some of the individual mausolea have been the subjects of comprehensive monographs, especially in recent years, though others have been treated only in short articles or as parts of larger works.
    [Show full text]
  • Megalithic Structures of the Northern Sahara (Chott El Jérid, Tunisia)
    Cartagine. Studi e Ricerche, 5 (2020) Sezione: Saggi e Studi Rivista della Scuola Archeologica Italiana di Cartagine Articolo presentato il 15/04/2020 http://ojs.unica.it/index.php/caster/index Accettato in data 09/05/2020 issn 2532-1110; doi: 10.13125/caster/4078 Pubblicato in data 21/05/2020 CaSteR, 5 (2020) Megalithic Structures of the northern Sahara (Chott el Jérid, Tunisia) Andrea Monaco1, LotfiBelhouchet 2, Hedi Bel Hadj Brahim3, Tarek Ben Fraj4, Jaâfar Ben Nasr5, Ridha Boussoffara2, Emanuele Cancellieri1, Moufida Jnen2, Enrico Lucci1, Rocco Rotunno1, Savino di Lernia1, 6 1Department of Ancient World Studies, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; 2Institute National du Patrimoine, Tunisia; 3Ar- tisanat du Sahara, Douz, Tunisia; 4Faculté des Lettres et des Sciences Humaines, Université de Sousse, Tunisia; Laboratoire de Cartographie Géomorphologique des Milieux, des Environnements et des Dynamiques (CGMED), Université de Tunis, Tunisia; 5Faculté des Lettres et des Sciences Humaines, Université de Kairouan, Tunisia; 6GAES, University of Witwaters- rand, Johannesburg, South Africa. corresponding author Savino di Lernia; mail: [email protected] 1. Introduction One of the distinctive archaeological features of the Sahara are the megalithic structures that in thousands punctuate the desert landscape as part of a larger phenomenon of Holo- cene North Africa. Stone monuments built to bury animals1, humans2 or exclusively as land- marks3, are found scattered over wide areas across the Sahara since the Middle Holocene, re- vealing a network of cultural connections among early pastoral communities. The typological variability of stone structures, reflecting a long chronological range and the local availability of raw materials, appears also to be correlated to their different functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology Activity Book
    Archaeology Activity Book Illustrations: Heather Brindza Text: Danielle Ellis Layout: Rebecca Conway Appalachian Forest Heritage Area (AFHA) is a non-profit, grassroots organization that promotes economic and community development by linking central Appalachian forest history, culture, natural history, products and forest management into a multi-state heritage tourism initiative. Monongahela National Forest hosts AFHA-sponsored AmeriCorps service at forest sites that enhance natural resources and tourism and connect local communities. The Eastern National Forests Interpretive Association (ENFIA) is a non-profit association that aids and promotes the historical, scientific, and educational activities of the USDA Forest Service. This activity book was made possible through grants and partnership agreements with AFHA AmeriCorps, ENFIA, and USDA Forest Service. Archaeology is the study of material culture left behind by people from the past. Material culture are things created or used by people, like stone tools, a glass bottle, or even an entire building. Archaeologists look for archaeological sites to try to answer questions about the past. A site is where artifacts, features, or ecofacts are grouped together in an area. This means people were in that area in the past, and it’s up to the archaeologist to figure out what they were doing there. Sometimes archaeologists find things that can’t be easily collected or are part of the environment past peoples used. These things are called features. Features are often large, like the foundation of a house, or difficult to collect from the site, like an ashy campfire ring. Feature example: campfire ring Artifacts are things created or used by past peoples.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of 1He Lithic Artifact Assemblage From
    AN ANALYSIS OF 1HE LITHIC ARTIFACT ASSEMBLAGE FROM THE FORBUSH CREEK SITE (31YD1), YADKIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA by Jane Madeline McManus A thesis sul::mitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts with Honors in the Department of Anthropology. Chapel Hill 1985 Approved by: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the members of my committee, Dr. Dickens, Dr. Crumley, and Dr. Davis, whose support, help, and advice is greatly appreciated. I would especially like to thank Steve who helped me from the first day of this project to the last. You know I couldn't have done it without your help. I would also like to thank Dr. Dickens and Trawick for teaching me the ropes of photography. You all have made this a very rewarding learning experience. Finally, I would like to say thanks to Carol Anne and Lee for putting up with me and I'm sorry for the neglect. DEDICATION To Monnna and Daddy, with all my love and appreciation for the opportunity. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION • 1 RAW MATERIAL. 7 DEBITAGE. 8 CHIPPED STONE IMPLEMENTS • 15 CHIPPED STONE PROJECTILE POINTS. 22 GROUND STONE IMPLEMENTS. 28 DISCUSSION • 35 Characteristics of the Forbush Creek Assemblage • • 35 The Introduction of European Metal Tools. 36 The Subsistence Pattern. 37 Small Triangular Projectile Points. 38 SUMMARY. • 48 REFERENCES CITED. 50 APPENDICES • 51 Appendix A. Lithic Artifact Analysis Format. 52 Appendix B. Distribution of Lithic Artifacts by Feature. 58 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Music in the Northern Woods: an Archaeological Exploration of Musical Instrument Remains
    Michigan Technological University Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Reports 2018 Music in the Northern Woods: An Archaeological Exploration of Musical Instrument Remains Matthew Durocher Michigan Technological University, [email protected] Copyright 2018 Matthew Durocher Recommended Citation Durocher, Matthew, "Music in the Northern Woods: An Archaeological Exploration of Musical Instrument Remains", Open Access Master's Thesis, Michigan Technological University, 2018. https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.etdr/575 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etdr Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Ethnomusicology Commons, and the Musicology Commons MUSIC IN THE NORTHERN WOODS: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXPLORATION OF MUSICAL INSTRUMENT REMAINS By Matthew J Durocher A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In Industrial Archaeology MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2018 © 2018 Matthew J Durocher This thesis has been approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Industrial Archaeology. Department of Social Sciences Thesis Advisor: Dr. LouAnn Wurst Committee Member: Dr. Steven A. Walton Committee Member: M. Bartley Seigel Department Chair: Dr. Hugh Gorman Table of Contents List of Figures………………………………………………………………………….v List of Tables…………………………………………………………………………vii Acknowledgments........................................................................viii Abstract………………………………………………………………………………….x 1. There was music…………………………………………………………………..1 1.1. Enter Coalwood…………………………………………………………………………….3 1.2. A prelude……………………………………………………………………………………..7 2. Fresh Water, Ore, and Lumber……………………………………………10 2.1. Early logging and music in the Upper Peninsula………………………….…14 2.2. Cleveland Cliffs Iron Mining Company………………………………………….16 2.3. Coalwood: 1901-1912…………………………………………………………………..18 2.4. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………26 3. The Sounds of a Place.………………………………………………………..28 3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • TOMBS and FOOTPRINTS: ISLAMIC SHRINES and PILGRIMAGES IN^IRAN and AFGHANISTAN Wvo't)&^F4
    TOMBS AND FOOTPRINTS: ISLAMIC SHRINES AND PILGRIMAGES IN^IRAN AND AFGHANISTAN WvO'T)&^f4 Hugh Beattie Thesis presented for the degree of M. Phil at the University of London School of Oriental and African Studies 1983 ProQuest Number: 10672952 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10672952 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 abstract:- The thesis examines the characteristic features of Islamic shrines and pilgrimages in Iran and Afghan­ istan, in doing so illustrating one aspect of the immense diversity of belief and practice to be found in the Islamic world. The origins of the shrine cults are outlined, the similarities between traditional Muslim and Christian attitudes to shrines are emphasized and the functions of the shrine and the mosque are contrasted. Iranian and Afghan shrines are classified, firstly in terms of the objects which form their principal attrac­ tions and the saints associated with them, and secondly in terms of the distances over which they attract pilgrims. The administration and endowments of shrines are described and the relationship between shrines and secular authorities analysed.
    [Show full text]