DOCSLIB.ORG

POSSIBLE EFFECTS of the RIO BLANCO PROJECT on the Oveklying OIL SHALE and MINERAL DEPOSITS F

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
POSSIBLE EFFECTS of the RIO BLANCO PROJECT on the Oveklying OIL SHALE and MINERAL DEPOSITS F TID-4500, UC-35 Nuclear Explosions — Peaceful Applications L5 LASA/RENCE UVERMORE LABORATORY Unh*^atCa*xrik/UmrnK^Cm>nl4/94550 UCRL-51163 POSSIBLE EFFECTS OF THE RIO BLANCO PROJECT ON THE OVEkLYING OIL SHALE AND MINERAL DEPOSITS F. Holzer D. O, Emerson MS. date: December 27, 1971 — NOT.CE- Thlt report was prepare? «*i an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States no? tha United States Aiomic Energy Commission, nor any/ of sheir employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontnctors; or their employees, maJcai vat 1*f*«M*y, »*gs«s,«s irnqKaA, « mawata any lags] liability or responsibility for the accuracy, com­ pleteness or usefulness of iny {information, apparatus, product or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. wawsimw OF THIS oocumm is ONI Contents Abstract 1 Introduction 1 The Hio Blanco Project and Site Geology 3 Proposed Phases of the ?roject 3 Subsurface Geology and Mineral Distribution 6 Stratigraphy 6 Mineral Distribution ~i Hydrology 10 Effects of Rio Blanco 10 Subsurface and Near-Surface Effects 10 Explosion-Induced Fault Motion 20 Effects on Mines 22 Summary 25 Acknowledgments 25 References 26 •iii- POSSIBLE EFFECTS OF THE RIO BLANCO PROJECT ON THE OVERLYING OIL SHALE AND MINERAL DEPOSITS Abstract The proposed Rio Blanco nuclear deto­ We expect no subsurface separation of the nation for stimulating natural gas produc­ rock layers in the Green River Forma­ tion (and the subsequent development of tion. A seismic reflection survey shows the Rio Blanco Unit) has raised questions that the closest indication of a subsurface about possible harmful effects of the ex­ fault occurs about 2 miles from the Rio plosions on the overlying formations con­ Blanco location. Data from the Nevada taining oil and sodium minerals. We Teat Site show that no fault farther than show that fractures will extend to perhaps 6000 ft from a 100-kt explosion would 400 ft above tht> upper explosive. Since undergo explosion-induced displacements, at least 2300 ft separates the gas-bearing and hence none is expected from Rio strata from the oil shale and minerals, Blanco. At the mine closest to Rio no fractures will extend into the forma­ Blanco, we predict the peak acceleration tions containing these resources. We to be 0.06 g. Since this was about the calculate a spall depth of about 170 ft; same acceleration experienced by this our experience indicates that no harmful mine from the Rulison explosion, Rio effects will occur as a result of this spall. Blanco should not cause any mine damage. Introduction As part of the Plowshare Program's tial phase are now being defined, and the use of nuclear explosives to stimulate environmental impact is being studied. the recovery of natural gaa from low- The progress of the plans for the first permeability formations, the CER- phase of the Rio Blanco Project, as well Geonuclear Corporation, together with as for the subsequent unit development, the Equity Oil Company, has proposed has raised concern among various corpo­ a project whose initial phase consists of rations that are attempting to develop the simultaneous detonation in a single economic techniques for recovering oil emplacement well of three 30-kt nuclear and other minerals from the oil shale explosives in the Fort Onion and deposits that are distributed in various Mesaverde Formations of Colorado's amounts in different parts of the Piceance Piceance Basin. The details of this ini- Basin,2 Emplacement well Parachute Greek Member Green River Formation (oil shale and minerals) 7MZL -Orange Marker 2900 3000 -- 4000 -- Wasatch Formation 5000 -- 53«) Fort Union Formation Oil shale 6000 (>I0gal/ron) 6180 Gas-bearing Mesaverde Formation sandstone 7000 H Fig. 1. Generalized geological cross section at the Rio Blanco site showing the main gas-bearing formations as well as oil- and mineral-containing formations. Depths indicated are in feet; the horizontal scale is equal to the vertical scale. -2 Our approach is to examine the poten­ 4) Explosion-induced motion on exist- tial impact of Rio Blanco on the geologic ing faults. formations containing the oil and the 5) Damage to existing mines. sodium minerals nahcolite and dawsonite. Figure 1 shows the relation of the pro­ The premise on which the conclusions are posed Rio Blanco Phase-1 project to the based is that if these formations are not geologic formations containing oil shale fractured as a result of the explosions and minerals. The gas-bearing forma­ or attendant phenomena, then the re­ tions that are planned for nuclear stimu­ covery of the oil and minerals will not lation lie, in general, at a depth greater be affected. than 5000 ft, while the oil shale and We examined the following possi­ mineral-containing rocks are, in general, bilities: encountered in the 400- to 3000-ft interval. The main conclusion reached from the 1) Direct fracturing from the explosion studies presented in the following sections zone into the oil shale and the for­ is that the separation of more than 2300 ft mations bearing sodium minerals. between the detonation zones and the 2) Extent and depth of surface fractur­ mineral-containing formations serves ing or "spall." as an effective barrier between them and 3) Subourface separation of the various makes any disturbance of the latter highly strata and layers. unlikely. The Rio Blanco Project and Site Geology The location of Phase 1 of the Bio Blanco simultaneously, the details of the Phase-2 Project, as well as th<? unit proposed for explosions are not yet formulated. The subsequent development, is shown in nature of this phase will depend on the re­ Fig. 2. Phase 1 {hereafter referred to sults from Phase 1 and on progress made simply as Bio Blanco) ie located 52 mites in developing explosives suitable for se­ north of Grand Junction, Colo., and 31, quential detonation. For example, it 30, and 37 miles from Rangely, Meeker, might make most sense at some locations and Rifle, Colo., respectively. to use three 100-kt explosives (emplaced Figure 3 shows the location of the Rio in the same bole) that would be detonated Blanco Unit with respect to the Piceance a number of minutes or longer apart so Basin boundaries and the approximate as to stimulate the largest vertical thick­ locations of the proposed P.hase-2 ness of gas-bearing formation with the explosions. minimum practical ground motion; in other locations a smaller or perhaps larger yield PROPOSED PHASES OP THE PROJECT might well be indicated. An explosive that While Rio Blanco is planned to consist is sufficiently rugged for sequential deto­ ot three 30-kt explosive* spaced approxi­ nation has not yet been developed, how­ mately 420 to 450 ft apart Eiid detonated ever, and proceeding to Phase 2 with Fig. 2. Map showing distances from the Rir Blanco emplacement well to nearby com­ munities. The Rio Blanco Unit is also outliaed. -4- j|g^y^ ® Rio Blanco Phase-1 location kfe- O ApProx'mate Phase-2 location Fig. 3. Location of the Rio Blanco Unit within the Piceance Creek Basin. Tht Phase-2 locations snown are approximate only. -5- simultaneous detonations should net be scription of these topics is necessary to ruled out at this time. evaluate the potential impact of the Rio Phase 3 is presently contemplated to Blanco Project. consist of 20 to 60 well stimulations whose Figure 4 depicts a cross section of the nature and location will depend on the re­ subsurface geology along a;i approximately sults from the previous phases. A more east-west line through the Rio Blanco em­ extensive development of the unit, con­ placement well, and Fig. 5 shows the sisting of stimulating perhaps an addi­ cross section in a generally northeast- tional 100 wells, would follow. southwest line for the western portion of the unit. These figures show that the beds SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY AND MINERAL dip and thicken from west to east and from DISTRIBUTION south to north. Generally, the Evacuation The general subsurface geology and Creek Member of the Green River Forma­ mineral attribution of the Piceance Creek tion is exposed at the surface. However, Basin have been studied extensively and are the Parachute Creek Member outcrops in 3 described in the literature. We will not the extreme southwestern corner. attempt to duplicate this information here Stratigraphy but will focus our attention instead on the The stratigrapbic horizons observed Rio Blanco Unit, for which a brief de­ near the emplacement well for Rio Blanco 6000 ft ~-~^-"ir-- Mahogany Zone-* _ m . _2range_Mar|(er (Base of lean oil shale) 4000 ft 2000 ft Sea level West last Fig. 4. Geologic cross section along a general east/west line through the Rio Blanco Unit and the Phase-1 emplacement well. 6000 ft "TCFarige Marker 4000 ft (Base of lean oil shale) 2000 ft Sea level Southwest Northe st Fig. 5. Geologic cross section from southwest to northeast of the western par. of the '. io Blanco Unit. are at a depth that is about average for the Formation, a mudstone and shal J unit unit. At that location alluvium deposits containing intermitteat and infr* quent in the stream bed are found bet'veen the lenses of sandstont carrying g 9 and surface and a depth of about 100 ft. Be­ water, extends from about 3000 to 5360 ft. tween 100 and 400 ft below the surface is Below this level are gas-bearing sands of found the Evacuation Creek Member of the Fort Union and Mesaverde Formations the Green River Formation—a barren in which the proposed nuclear detonations sandstone, siltstone, and mudstone forma­ will take place.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The United States Nuclear Weapon Program
    /.i. - y _-. --_- -. : _ - . i - DOE/ES4005 (Draft) I _ __ _ _ _____-. 67521 - __ __-. -- -- .-- THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR - %”WEAPQN PROGRA,hik ..I .La;*I* . , ASUMMARYHISTORY \ ;4 h : . ,‘f . March 1983 \ .;_ U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary, Management and Administration Office of The Executive Secretariat History Division -. DOE/ES4005 (Draft) THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WEAPON PROG.RAM: ASUMMARYHISTORY .' . c *. By: . Roger M. Anders Archivist With: Jack M. Hall Alice L. Buck Prentice C. Dean March 1983 ‘ .I \ . U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary, Management and Administration Office of The Executive Secretariat History Division Washington, D. C. 20585 ‘Thelkpaemlt of Energy OqanizationAct of 1977 b-mughttcgether for the first tim in one departxrmtrmst of the Federal GovenmTle?t’s - Programs-With these programs cam a score of organizational ‘ . ? entities,eachwithi+ccxmhistoryandtraditions,frmadozendepart- . .‘I w ’ mnts and independentagencies. The EIistoryDivision,- prepareda . seriesof paqhlets on The Institutional Originsof the De-t of v Eachpamphletexplainsthehistory,goals,and achievemzntsof a predecessoragency or a major prqrm of the -to=-TY* This parquet, which replacesF&ger M. Anders'previous booklet on "The Office of MilitaxxApplication," traces the histoe of the UrL+& Statesnuclearweapx prcgramfrmits inceptionduring World War II to the present. Nuclear weqons form the core of America's m&z defenses. Anders'history describes the truly fo&idable effortscf 5e Atanic Energy Cmmission, the F;nergy Rfzsearch and Develqmlt z4dmCstratian,andtheDep&m- to create adiverse a* sophistica~arsenzl ofnucleaz ~accctqli&mentsofL~se agenciesandtheirplants andlabc J zrsatedan "atanic shie2 WMchp- Psrrericatoday. r kger M. Anders is a trained historianworking in the Eistzq Divisbn.
    [Show full text]
  • 3: Containing Underground Nuclear Explosions
    Chapter 3 Containing Underground Nuclear Explosions . CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION . 31 WHAT HAPPENS DURING AN UNDERGROUND NUCLEAR EXPLOSION 32 Microseconds . 32 Milliseconds . +. 32 Tenths of a Second . 32 A Few Seconds . 32 Minutes to Days . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ........ 32 WHY NUCLEAR EXPLOSIONS REMAIN CONTAINED ... ...... SELECTING LOCATION, DEPTH, AND SPACING: . 35 REVIEWING A TEST SITE LOCATION . 37 CONTAINMENT EVALUATION PANEL . .38 CONTAINING VERTICAL SHAFT TESTS . 40 CONTAINING HORIZONTAL TUNNEL TESTS . .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... ...... 41 TYPES OF RADIATION RELEASES . 46 Containment Failure: . 46 Late-Time Seep . 46 Controlled Tunnel Purging . 47 Operational Release . 47 RECORD OF CONTAINMENT . 47 Containment Evaluation Panel . 47 Vertical Drill Hole ’lasts . 48 Horizontal Tunnel Tests . 48 From the Perspective of Human Health Risk . 49 A FEW EXAMPLES: . 49 IS THERE A REAL ESTATE PROBLEM AT NTS? . 51 TIRED MOUNTAIN SYNDROME? . 51 HOW SAFE IS SAFE ENOUGH? . 54 Box Page 3-A. Baneberry . 33 Figures Figure Page 3-1. Formation of Stress “Containment Cage” . 35 3-2. Minimum Shot Separation for Drill Hole Tests . 38 3-3. Minimum Shot Separation for Tunnel Tests . 39 3-4. “Typical’’ Stemming Plan . 41 3-5. Three Redundant Containment Vessels . 42 3-6. Vessel I . 43 3-7. Vessel 1 Closures . 44 3-8. Tunnel Closure Sequence . 45 3-9. Typical Post-Shot Configuration . .46 3-10.4Radius of Decrease in Rock Strength . .. .. ... ... ....... 53 Table Page 3-1. Release From Underground Tests . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .......8 48 Chapter 3 Containing Underground Nuclear Explosions Underground nuclear tests are designed and reviewed for containment, with redundancy and conservatism in each step. INTRODUCTION atmospheric testing was conducted in the Christmas Island and Johnston Island area of the Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Nuclear Weapon Program: A
    DOE/ES-0005 (Draft) 67521 wees ce eee ee ee THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WEAPON PROGRAM: | A SUMMARYHISTORY '<) March 1983 U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary, Management and Administration Office of The Executive Secretariat History Division DOE/ES-0005 (Draft) THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR | WEAPON PROGRAM: A SUMMARY HISTORY © | « By: Roger M. Anders Archivist With: Jack M. Holl Alice L. Buck Prentice C. Dean March 1983 U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary, Management and Administration Office of The Executive Secretariat History Division Washington, D.C. 20585 The Department of Energy Organization Act of 1977 brought together for the first time in one department most of the Federal Government's energy programs. With these programs came a score of organizational entities, each with its owm history and traditions, from a dozen depart- ‘ments and independent agencies. The History Division has prepared a series of pamphlets on The Institutional Origins of the Department of Energy. Each pamphlet explains the history, goals, and achievements of @ predecessor agency or a major program of the Department of Energy. This pamphlet, which replaces Roger M. Anders' previous booklet cn "The Office of Military Application," traces the history of the United States nuclear weapon program from its inception during World War II to the present. Nuclear weapons form the core of America's modern defenses. anders! history describes the truly formidable efforts of «ne Atomic Energy Commission, the Energy Research and Develogment Administration, and the Departmr to create a diverse anc sophisticated arsenal of nuclear 2 accomplishments of these agencies and their plants and lak : created an “atomic shieic" which protects America today.
    [Show full text]
  • Bob Farquhar
    1 2 Created by Bob Farquhar For and dedicated to my grandchildren, their children, and all humanity. This is Copyright material 3 Table of Contents Preface 4 Conclusions 6 Gadget 8 Making Bombs Tick 15 ‘Little Boy’ 25 ‘Fat Man’ 40 Effectiveness 49 Death By Radiation 52 Crossroads 55 Atomic Bomb Targets 66 Acheson–Lilienthal Report & Baruch Plan 68 The Tests 71 Guinea Pigs 92 Atomic Animals 96 Downwinders 100 The H-Bomb 109 Nukes in Space 119 Going Underground 124 Leaks and Vents 132 Turning Swords Into Plowshares 135 Nuclear Detonations by Other Countries 147 Cessation of Testing 159 Building Bombs 161 Delivering Bombs 178 Strategic Bombers 181 Nuclear Capable Tactical Aircraft 188 Missiles and MIRV’s 193 Naval Delivery 211 Stand-Off & Cruise Missiles 219 U.S. Nuclear Arsenal 229 Enduring Stockpile 246 Nuclear Treaties 251 Duck and Cover 255 Let’s Nuke Des Moines! 265 Conclusion 270 Lest We Forget 274 The Beginning or The End? 280 Update: 7/1/12 Copyright © 2012 rbf 4 Preface 5 Hey there, I’m Ralph. That’s my dog Spot over there. Welcome to the not-so-wonderful world of nuclear weaponry. This book is a journey from 1945 when the first atomic bomb was detonated in the New Mexico desert to where we are today. It’s an interesting and sometimes bizarre journey. It can also be horribly frightening. Today, there are enough nuclear weapons to destroy the civilized world several times over. Over 23,000. “Enough to make the rubble bounce,” Winston Churchill said. The United States alone has over 10,000 warheads in what’s called the ‘enduring stockpile.’ In my time, we took care of things Mano-a-Mano.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 69, No. 162/Monday, August 23, 2004
    Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 162 / Monday, August 23, 2004 / Notices 51825 Format (PDF) on the Internet at the Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, and oxidation process). Other following site: http://www.ed.gov/news/ SW., Washington, DC 20585; e-mail: corrections include: B&T Metals (OH) fedregister. [email protected]; toll free: (the DOE designation was in error and To use PDF you must have Adobe 1–877–447–9756; URL: http:// has been removed), Foote Mineral (PA) Acrobat Reader, which is available free www.eh.doe.gov/advocacy/. (the BE designation has been on the at this site. If you have questions about SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: program’s Web site (noted below) since using PDF, call the U.S. Government inception, but was inadvertently Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1– Purpose missing from the Federal Register 888–293–6498; or in the Washington, The Energy Employees Occupational notice), Swenson Evaporator (is located DC, area at (202) 512–1530. Illness Compensation Program Act of in Harvey, not Chicago, IL) and C.H. 2000 (‘‘Act’’), Title 36 of Public Law Schnorr, PA (previously Schnoor). This Note: The official version of this document 106–398, establishes a program to is the document published in the Federal notice also deletes the listing for Ledoux Register. Free Internet access to the official provide compensation to individuals (NY) entirely because it was learned that edition of the Federal Register and the Code who developed illnesses as a result of no radioactivity was used at that of Federal Regulations is available on GPO their employment in nuclear weapons location.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Annual Report
    2018 Annual Report Nevada Test Site Historical Foundation Organizational Profile VISION Members of the Nevada Test Site Historical Foundation work as responsible stewards of the U.S. defense legacy by preserving the history of the Nevada Test Site and assuring public access by future generations to resources that define the nation’s nuclear testing program. MISSION NEVADA TEST SITE HISTORICAL FOUNDATION The mission of the Nevada Test Site Historical Foundation is to preserve and foster public accessi- bility to the history associated with the Nevada Test Site and the nation’s nuclear weapons testing program. The NTS Foundation promotes and supports cultural, educational, and scientific program- ming to encourage the development and public exchange of views regarding the Nevada Test Site and its impact on the nation. NATIONAL ATOMIC TESTING MUSEUM The mission of the National Atomic Testing Museum is to objectively preserve and interpret the nuclear history of the Nevada Test Site and to educate and inform current and future generations about its impact on 21st Century nuclear science and the world. CORE VALUES The Foundation is dedicated to enhancing and supporting the programs and activities depicting the history of our nation’s nuclear weapons testing program and recognizing the contribution of its people. In so doing, we affirm our dedication by: » Applying creativity and commitment in support of activities that foster open communication and public awareness » Pledging ourselves to high standards of integrity and ethics in accomplishing our work » Providing a model of excellence in all that we do for others to emulate » Instilling a spirit of teamwork and cooperation within the Foundation and among partners » Encouraging and rewarding innovation and risk-taking GOVERNANCE The Nevada Test Site Historical Foundation management is vested in a Board of Trustees.
    [Show full text]
  • The Containment of Underground Nuclear Explosions
    The Containment of Underground Nuclear Explosions October 1989 NTIS order #PB90-156183 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, The Containment of Underground Nuclear Explosions, OTA-ISC-414 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, October 1989), Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 89-600707 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 (order form can be found in the back of this report) Foreword Within weeks after the ending of World War II, plans for the first nuclear test series “Operation Crossroads” were underway. The purpose then, as now, was to develop new weapon systems and to study the effects of nuclear explosions on military equipment. The development of the nuclear testing program has been paralleled by public opposition from both an arms control and an environmental perspective. Much of the criticism is due to the symbolic nature of testing nuclear weapons and from the radiation hazards associated with the early practice of testing in the atmosphere. Recently, however, specific concerns have also been raised about the current underground testing program; namely: . Are testing practices safe? . Could an accidental release of radioactive material escape undetected? ● Is the public being fully informed of all the dangers emanating from the nuclear testing program? These concerns are fueled in part by the secrecy that surrounds the testing program and by publicized problems at nuclear weapons production facilities. At the request of the House Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs and Senator Orrin G. Hatch, OTA undertook an assessment of the containment and monitoring practices of the nuclear testing program.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 66, No. 112/Monday, June 11
    31218 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2001 / Notices Dated: June 5, 2001. The meeting will commence at 8:30 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas M. Corwin, a.m. with opening remarks, and review Office of Worker Advocacy, 1–877–447– Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for and approval of the meeting agenda. 9756. Elementary and Secondary Education. From 9 a.m. to 12 noon, the Board will ADDRESSES: The Department welcomes [FR Doc. 01–14767 Filed 6–8–01; 8:45 am] discuss and take action on comments on this list. Individuals who BILLING CODE 4000–01–M recommendations of the Committee on wish to suggest additional facilities for Standards, Design, and Methodology inclusion on the list, indicate why one (COSDAM) on the NAEP design. From or more facilities should be removed DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 12 noon to 1 p.m. the Board will receive from the list, or provide other an update on NAEP related information may contact: National Assessment Governing Congressional activities. From 1:00 to Board; Meeting Office of Worker Advocacy (EH–8), U.S. 2:00 p.m., the Board will discuss Department of Energy, 1000 AGENCY: National Assessment COSDAM’s recommendations on the Independence Avenue, SW, Governing Board; Education. NAEP 2002 Field Test. A general Washington, DC 20585, email: discussion of President Bush’s ‘‘No ACTION: Notice of full board meeting. [email protected], toll- Child Left Behind’’ initiative will take free: 1–877–447–9756 place between 2 p.m. and 3 p.m., upon SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: schedule and proposed agenda of a which time the meeting will adjourn.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 249/Friday, December 27, 2002
    79068 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 249 / Friday, December 27, 2002 / Notices Applications) in the application Access at: http://www/access.gpo.gov/nara/ developed illnesses as a result of their package. index.html. employment in nuclear weapons For Applications Contact: Education Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1138–1138d. production-related activities and at Publications Center (ED Pubs), PO Box certain federally-owned facilities in Dated: December 20, 2002. 1398, Jessup, MD 20794–1398. which radioactive materials were used. Telephone (toll free): 1–877–433–7827. Jeffrey R. Andrade, On December 7, 2000, the President FAX: (301) 470–1244. If you use a Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, issued Executive Order 13179 (‘‘Order’’) telecommunications device for the deaf Planning and Innovation. directing the Department of Energy (TDD), you may call (toll free): 1–877– [FR Doc. 02–32714 Filed 12–26–02; 8:45 am] (‘‘Department’’ or ‘‘DOE’’) to list covered 567–7734. BILLING CODE 4001–01–P facilities in the Federal Register, which You may also contact ED Pubs at its the Department did on January 17, 2001, Web site: http://www.ed.gov/pubs/ and again on June 11, 2001. This notice edpubs.html. Or you may contact ED DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY revises the previous lists and provides Pubs at its e-mail address: additional information about the [email protected]. Energy Employees Occupational covered facilities, atomic weapons If you request an application from ED Illness Compensation Act of 2000; employers, and beryllium vendors. Pubs, be sure to identify this Revision to List of Covered Facilities Section 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Beyond Nuclear Testing the Nevada Test Site
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 5-1999 Life beyond nuclear testing the Nevada Test Site Fina Martinez-Myers University of Nevada Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Economic Policy Commons, Growth and Development Commons, Public Administration Commons, Public Policy Commons, and the Science and Technology Policy Commons Repository Citation Martinez-Myers, Fina, "Life beyond nuclear testing the Nevada Test Site" (1999). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 239. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/1452561 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LIFE BEYOND NUCLEAR TESTING THE NEVADA TEST SITE Fina Martinez-Myers A professional paper submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Public Administration Department of Public Administration University of Nevada, Las Vegas May 1999 ABSTRACT Life Beyond Nuclear Testing. The Nevada Test Site by Fina Martinez-Myers Dr. Karen Layne, Examination Committee Chair Professor of Public Administration University of Nevada, Las Vegas The Nevada Test Site (NTS) has served a crucial role in protecting the nation's security over the last 50 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada National Security Site Tour Booklet
    Nevada National Security Site Tour Booklet Nevada Site Specific Advisory Board October 15, 2015 Prohibited Articles On Nevada National Security Site Public Tours The following items are prohibited within the boundaries of the Nevada National Security Site public tours. Tour escorts are required to do random checks. • Cellular Phones • Recording Devices • Bluetooth Enabled Devices • Pets and Animals • PDA, BlackBerry, etc. • Explosives • Computers • Ammunition • Portable Data Storage Devices • Incendiary Devices • Global Positioning System (GPS) • Chemical Irritants • Cameras/Camcorders • Alcoholic Beverages • Binoculars • Controlled Substances • Optical Instruments • Any Item Prohibited by Law Possession of these items may delay the tour and prevent your participation. If at any point during the tour these items are discovered, the tour may be terminated. 1153FY16 – 10/15/2015 – Page 2 Log No. 2015-128Page 2Title Page 2 Tour Agenda* 7:15 a.m. NSSAB meets charter bus in front of lot 3 at 10:25 a.m. Arrive at Area 5 RWMC, Revegetation at CAU Centennial Hills Transit Center Park and Ride 111, Area 5 Closed Mixed Waste Sites, Work in Las Vegas Plan #3 7:30 a.m. Bus leaves Park & Ride promptly for 11:30 a.m. Depart for Stockade Wash Overlook Mercury, NV 12:15 p.m. Arrive at Stockade Wash Overlook, lunch, 8:20 a.m. Arrive at Mercury Badge Office Path to Closure for Rainier Mesa/Shoshone Mountain, Work Plan #6 8:40 a.m. Arrive at Gate 100 for badge check 1:05 p.m. Depart for U1a Complex 8:45 a.m. Depart for Frenchman Flat Overlook 1:30 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainier Mesa/Shoshone Mountain, Nevada Test Site, Nevada
    Nevada DOE/NV--1031 Environmental Restoration Project Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 99: Rainier Mesa/Shoshone Mountain, Nevada Test Site, Nevada Controlled Copy No.: Revision No.: 0 December 2004 Approved for public release; further dissemination unlimited. Environmental Restoration Division U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office Available for sale to the public from: U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Phone: 800.553.6847 Fax: 703.605.6900 Email: [email protected] Online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/ordering.htm Available electronically at http://www.osti.gov/bridge Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062 Phone: 865.576.8401 Fax: 865.576.5728 Email: [email protected] Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors. Printed on recycled paper DOE/NV--1031 CORRECTIVE ACTION INVESTIGATION PLAN FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION UNIT 99: RAINIER MESA/SHOSHONE MOUNTAIN NEVADA TEST SITE, NEVADA U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office Las Vegas, Nevada Controlled Copy No.: Revision No.: 0 December 2004 Approved for public release; further dissemination unlimited. CORRECTIVE ACTION INVESTIGATION PLAN FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION UNIT 99: RAINIER MESA/SHOSHONE MOUNTAIN NEVADA TEST SITE, NEVADA Approved by: Date: Bill Wilborn, Acting Project Manager Underground Test Area Project Approved by: Date: Robert M.
    [Show full text]