DOCSLIB.ORG

The United States Nuclear Weapon Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

/.i. - y _-. --_- -. : _ - . i - DOE/ES4005 (Draft) I _ __ _ _ _____-. 67521 - __ __-. -- -- .-- THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR - %”WEAPQN PROGRA,hik ..I .La;*I* . , ASUMMARYHISTORY \ ;4 h : . ,‘f . March 1983 \ .;_ U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary, Management and Administration Office of The Executive Secretariat History Division -. DOE/ES4005 (Draft) THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WEAPON PROG.RAM: ASUMMARYHISTORY .' . c *. By: . Roger M. Anders Archivist With: Jack M. Hall Alice L. Buck Prentice C. Dean March 1983 ‘ .I \ . U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary, Management and Administration Office of The Executive Secretariat History Division Washington, D. C. 20585 ‘Thelkpaemlt of Energy OqanizationAct of 1977 b-mughttcgether for the first tim in one departxrmtrmst of the Federal GovenmTle?t’s - Programs-With these programs cam a score of organizational ‘ . ? entities,eachwithi+ccxmhistoryandtraditions,frmadozendepart- . .‘I w ’ mnts and independentagencies. The EIistoryDivision,- prepareda . seriesof paqhlets on The Institutional Originsof the De-t of v Eachpamphletexplainsthehistory,goals,and achievemzntsof a predecessoragency or a major prqrm of the -to=-TY* This parquet, which replacesF&ger M. Anders'previous booklet on "The Office of MilitaxxApplication," traces the histoe of the UrL+& Statesnuclearweapx prcgramfrmits inceptionduring World War II to the present. Nuclear weqons form the core of America's m&z defenses. Anders'history describes the truly fo&idable effortscf 5e Atanic Energy Cmmission, the F;nergy Rfzsearch and Develqmlt z4dmCstratian,andtheDep&m- to create adiverse a* sophistica~arsenzl ofnucleaz ~accctqli&mentsofL~se agenciesandtheirplants andlabc J zrsatedan "atanic shie2 WMchp- Psrrericatoday. r kger M. Anders is a trained historianworking in the Eistzq Divisbn. Although whenever pssible he has checked his work K%C-;: appropriateoffices within the De-t, the author, and the CCef Historian ultitely detemined the conicentand conclusionsof L!7e study* The paqhlet is the product of teamork within the Hiszz~~ Division,and the authorjoins IE in thankingAJice Buck,prentice Dean, J&e Raines, and Travis Hulsey for their unflaggingskill, cheer- fulness,andhardwork It is our hope that this paxqhletwill prove useful both to De~talparsonnel and the public. _- ..-- _--_- - _ -- I _____ _ ._ .. .. -. c , .,’ l-l r-l In P W =t 2 2 ;;f A z Ki % x G m s; G 2 ts . 9 * . * . * . l . 0 . l . * . .* . a . e . 9 . $ . IG . 9 . g . B . 2 . .. ‘3 . +J . f . 2 . l . q . i . d, . m . +; . 2 . k . a . -i i . i . IQ . * . 8 . IT . I? ?ii . I . Ti . ‘cd . ri I illh . I3 ; . e: . ‘il . % . 2 . ii . $ . iI . 5!i B . g . B . 9 . 3 3 CH . d B ih PC8 . 1 PC 1 . d I . iI t: . I I I I . e-i 3 4 . 6 j 8 . l-l B . ii . # ci 6 ‘ii! 2 4 2 . II ii . .!z ul c tr, 5 I . 9 . y . ‘it 8 . , 1 .!T d a cc! B B . 2 iI Y . a d , , Ii ‘3 El8 % B a k B 8 4 fi IQ 3 B -2 1 ii! 8 IFi4 1- i3p P t 1i! Ii1 1 The origins of the UniM.States' nuclearweaponpxqramcanbe tracedto the discuveryof fissionin 1939. After scientistsdiscover& that an (_ atan ofuraniuxnaxldbe split,they also realizedthatfission. could release huge +munts of energy. If a fission bmb could be devel~,weapxsoftrm=ndous explosivepower couldbeprcduced. The weapms potential of fission was as apparent to American nuclear physicistsas to their counm in Nazi Germany.' Because Geman scientists disuvered fission,Hitler semzd to have a si~Lficant headstart on the road to a weapn which could terrorize Eursp an2 perhaps even the United States. Amzrican scientistsorganized them selves into research teams* anurgateffort todevelop an atcLc bmb beforeGemany. Hitler'sattackonPol.andandthe fall of France _cUele2 their efforks. whentheunitedStatesen~~thewarinDec~.1941, researchers dkecked by scientist-administratorsVann~BushandJ~~s B. t35nant. L un&r @JpJ& Tpc1;o -the Manhattsn Ehgineer District _- Grovesbuilttheplants and laboratoriesrequired toprcduceabak.At Oak Ridge,Tennessee, Grmes' engineerserected a huge gaseousdif,lsicn plant to prckce enricheduranic. At Eanford,Washiqton they t=,lt t!!ee reactorsto prcEuce the recentlydiscmered fissionableelmex plutonim. Finally at Los Alms Groves created a weapm lakrz~r~ under the directionof' J. F&x-t 0_3_=ztnheirrertc design atmic '-5. ..c.-c w~bzr and his colleagueswere c~rkin th$ a ,,cjun"km5 -_-.:' P uraniumwuld work but feared that an implosionbc& using plutorhm might fizzle. Therefore,they conducted the world's first nuclear weapon test at Alamgordo, New Maxicc in July 1945. The Tr5nitv shot wss a dramtic successand the ixplosionbmb, called"Fat Man" teas used on Nagasakion August 9, 1945,-three days after the “gun” lxrn?S, czlkd "Little Boy" was used on Hiroshima. The atmic bcxbs leveled both 2 citiesand ended the war in the Pacific. America now debat& hm tc manage the awesane power of attic energy* The debate'centered on congressionalefforts to create an .agencyto direct nuclear research and developmnt. One of the m* controversialLkueswaswhethertoentrustthe atcm to a civilianor to amilitary wency. Decidbigtoentrusttheatcmto civilians,Congress passed tie Atmic EnergyAct which President Truman signedon August 1, 1946. The Act established a five mnbar axmissiok and assignedto the CZczmissicnall atmic eneqy facilitiesandprogram. The AtunicDle-qy Act admmished the Carmissionto manage the atm "subjectat all~3ztas to the paramunt abjective of assuring the camm defense and security."3The congressionalmandatemeant thatdevelopingandtesting nuclearweapcns would be the firstpriority of the Atark Eneqy Cuks- Sian. To assure that the Cmmission factored military needs tit3 weaFonP=F=%the Act created a military liaison cmrnitteetc+LCi. repcrtedbothtcthe Cmmission and the Secretxy of Defewe. m provide Congressionalchecks and balances over the atic energy F-V q, the Act also created a Joint CongressionalCczmittee on Attic E==9Y* Before the Cmmission assumedcontrol of the atom, the Navy mr.cY: to Imcx what the attic bmb would do t=,a mdern fleet. 73.eKxI!-~c-L~ 3 Eqineer District acaxdingly axranged the Crossroads test at Bikini atoll. TwObc& weredetonatedneara ,,fleet"consisting of captured Germn and Japanese warships, a variety of other surfacevessels, and sukxnarines.For apublicccnditionedtoequatetheatomicbm-bswith the devastationof entire cities,the Mqaratively few ships sunk or damaged were a let-down. Afterwards,m congressmenquestionedthe i I 'need to hold the Crossroadstest atalL A coordinatedplan for developingatcmic weapons and investigatingtheir effectswould have to waituntilthenewCcmi.ssioncmld organize. The New Camnissionand the Cold War The Atmic Eneqy Ccxmissionofficially assured its duties on January 1, 1947. The Cmnission delegatedresponsibility for nucleaz weapon developmentto the division of military application. The divisim establishedprogram for the research,~develop-ent, and prsr duction of &clear weapons,andinterpretedmilitaqrequiremntsfor thepr&uctionofatanicbmbs totheCarmission.5 _ Intemationalevents soonlenturgencytothew=ponp~a= TensionsbeM2en the United States and the soviet Union had spkt t5e Grand Allianceof World War II and had begun the Cold War. The Cm- IluJnist guerillas under MqoTse-TqthenbroughtQzinaintotheSm-iet oxbit. Simul~ly CanTnmist guerrillas threatened to enguE Greece andperhaps thewhole eastern Nediterranean. ACXXpin Februazry1948 installedaC4mnunist ~ovwmwinczechoslovakia,and a few ~0:C,;:s later the Sovietsshut off the land routesto Berlin. PresidentT5.s~ equatedStalinwithHit&randdetexknedtostandup to the Camz-st threats" 3 W-g PresidentTruman that the United States'stzly of atomic weayns was not adqua- to met the security reqizments, the ccsnrnissionwent to work/ In the next few years the Ccmission con- vexed an obsolete oak Ridge plant to the prcduc?&m of weaponspar&; c. solv3d operating problems pla&ing Hanford reactors; put plutonium p1~03~don on an efficientbasis; and decidedto build 6~ rmre reactors r: at HanfoA. The Ccmnissionalso steppedup the p?cductionof enriched uxmtium frm the Oak Ridge gaseous diffusionplants and mved weapm ordnancewrk frmI;osAlams to the Sandia laboratoryin Albuquerqe, New &co, allming Los Alams to concmtrate on weapon research. Finally,the Mssion establisheda provinggrounds at EnewetakAtoll in the Pacific,sche&Aing its first test series,tied Sandstone,for the @ring of 1948. 'I% Sandstoneseries was a technicalsuccess 2nd enabled the (+rmissiontz double the smll stoc@ile of b&x.' 3 response to the Soviet ,*xt, the Cmmission had taken weapn ?rc- duction‘outofthe laboratory&>d had put it on an assezrbly-linebasis. After the Berlin crisis tit bmission decided to add a t!-k-5 gaseousdif-iuion plant to the Oak Ridge axrplex. The Joint Chiefs of Staff, hmever, determined in May 1949 that the riefenseEq!aLm.t needed far mxe b&x than Ccmission ,-la&s could then pmduce. c15Lo Joint Chiefs's requixdts mant that tz Gmnission would have zz build a fourthgaseous diffc?sion plant at Oak Ridge and redesignone cf the new reactorsat Hanford. The news that F?ussiahad set off an a*~Lc explosionon Pqust 29 'shockedthe nation and L3xched off a d3‘"a:e within'the govezmmt over whether to develop a hy3ogen bc&. X-x both tie &mission and the NationalSecurity Council bd conside_% 2~3 issue, president Trumn ordered the &mission to proceed Lzt!-.the develaprwt of a hydrogenbcrrb on January31, -1950.* The President'S order put the &mnission in a diffic_Lt-position. T0pmducethelarge gmntities of tritimthatthe hyd.rcgenIxxrbwould requiz, the CMrnissionwould have to reduce plutorim productionat Hanford and switch reactorsto
Recommended publications
  • People and Things

    People and Things

    People and things John Cumalat and David Neuffer, first Robert R. Wilson Fellows at Fermilab. The Wilson fellowships are special three year appointments awarded annually at Fermilab to outstanding young physicists in the fields of accelerators and particle physics. On people Accelerator specialist Ernie Courant is the recipient of the 1979 Boris Pregel A ward for Applied Science and Technology. The presentation was made at the annual meeting of the New York Academy of Sciences on 6 December. Giving cancer treatments at TRIUMF The first treatment of cancer patients began at TRIUMF in Nov­ ember using the negative pion beam from the biomedical channel. In this first series, patients with multiple skin tumour nodules are receiving ten daily treatments. In order to assess the effect of negative pions on human tissue, some of the nodules are being treated with pions and others with X-rays. Only when this is known can treatment of larger, deep-seated tumours com­ mence. The treatments at TRIUMF have been preceded by comprehen­ sive pre-clinical investigations in­ cluding both physical and radiobio­ logical studies, the latter including cultured cells, mice and pigs. Conferences on the horizon The Sixth International Conference on Experimental Meson Spectro­ scopy will be held at Brookhaven on 24-25 April. The Conference will cover experimental results in light and heavy quark spectroscopy, rele­ vant theory and spectrometer sys­ tems. For further information please contact CU. Chung or S.J. Linden- baum, Brookhaven National Labo­ ratory, Upton, New York 11973. The Mark II detector, previously used in experiments at SPEAR, seen here being installed in one of the experimental areas of the new PEP electron-positron collider.
  • Iowa State University Department Codes

    Iowa State University Department Codes

    Iowa State University Department Codes August 09, 2021 RMM RESOURCE PARENT CROSS- NUMERIC ALPHA UNIT DEPT DISCIPLINARY CODE CODE DIRECTORY NAME FULL NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER NUMBER DEPT NUMBER 30141 4HFDN 4-H FOUNDATION 4-H FOUNDATION 2150 BDSHR (515) 294-5390 030 01130 A B E AG/BIOSYS ENG AGRICULTURAL & BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING 1201 SUKUP (515) 294-1434 001 01132 A E AG ENGINEERING AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING 100 DAVIDSON (515) 294-1434 01130 01581 A ECL ANIMAL ECOLOGY ANIMAL ECOLOGY 253 BESSEY (515) 294-1458 01580 92290 A I C ACUMEN IND CORP ACUMEN INDUSTRIES CORPORATION 1613 RSRC PARK (515) 296-5366 999 45000 A LAB AMES LABORATORY AMES LABORATORY OF US DOE 151 TASF (515) 294-2680 020 10106 A M D APPAREL MERCH D APPAREL MERCHANDISING AND DESIGN 31 MACKAY (515) 294-7474 10100 80620 A S C APPL SCI COMPUT APPLIED SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING (515) 294-2694 999 10706 A TR ATH TRAIN ATHLETIC TRAINING 235 FORKER BLDG (515) 294-8009 10700 07040 A V C ART/VISUAL CULT ART AND VISUAL CULTURE 146 DESIGN (515) 294-5676 007 70060 A&BE AG & BIOSYS ENG AGRICULTURAL AND BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING (515) 294-1434 999 92100 AAT ADV ANAL TCH ADVANCED ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES INC ISU RSRC PARK (515) 296-6600 999 02010 ABE AG/BIOSYS ENG-E AGRICULTURAL & BIOSYSTEMS ENGR - ENGR 1201 SUKUP (515) 294-1434 002 01136 ABE A AG/BIOSYS ENG-A AGRICULTURAL & BIOSYSTEMS ENGR - AGLS 1201 SUKUP (515) 294-1434 01130 08100 ACCT ACCOUNTING ACCOUNTING 2330 GERDIN (515) 294-8106 008 08301 ACSCI ACTUARIAL SCI ACTUARIAL SCIENCE (515) 294-4668 008 10501 AD ED ADULT ED ADULT EDUCATION N131 LAGOMAR
  • Richard G. Hewlett and Jack M. Holl. Atoms

    Richard G. Hewlett and Jack M. Holl. Atoms

    ATOMS PEACE WAR Eisenhower and the Atomic Energy Commission Richard G. Hewlett and lack M. Roll With a Foreword by Richard S. Kirkendall and an Essay on Sources by Roger M. Anders University of California Press Berkeley Los Angeles London Published 1989 by the University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press, Ltd. London, England Prepared by the Atomic Energy Commission; work made for hire. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hewlett, Richard G. Atoms for peace and war, 1953-1961. (California studies in the history of science) Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Nuclear energy—United States—History. 2. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission—History. 3. Eisenhower, Dwight D. (Dwight David), 1890-1969. 4. United States—Politics and government-1953-1961. I. Holl, Jack M. II. Title. III. Series. QC792. 7. H48 1989 333.79'24'0973 88-29578 ISBN 0-520-06018-0 (alk. paper) Printed in the United States of America 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 CONTENTS List of Illustrations vii List of Figures and Tables ix Foreword by Richard S. Kirkendall xi Preface xix Acknowledgements xxvii 1. A Secret Mission 1 2. The Eisenhower Imprint 17 3. The President and the Bomb 34 4. The Oppenheimer Case 73 5. The Political Arena 113 6. Nuclear Weapons: A New Reality 144 7. Nuclear Power for the Marketplace 183 8. Atoms for Peace: Building American Policy 209 9. Pursuit of the Peaceful Atom 238 10. The Seeds of Anxiety 271 11. Safeguards, EURATOM, and the International Agency 305 12.
  • Department of Energy National Laboratories and Plants: Leadership in Cloud Computing (Brochure), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

    Department of Energy National Laboratories and Plants: Leadership in Cloud Computing (Brochure), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

    Department of Energy National Laboratories and Plants Leadership in Cloud Computing Prepared by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy; NREL is operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. JJJTABLE OF CONTENTS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NEVADA NATIONAL SECURITY SITE ........................................34 LABORATORIES AND PLANTS ......................................................4 Current State ...............................................................................34 Cloud Vision .................................................................................34 ABOUT THIS REPORT .....................................................................8 Key Initiatives ..............................................................................34 History of Computing ...............................................................9 Evolution of Computing Models ...........................................9 OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY ....................................36 What is Cloud Computing? ....................................................9 Current State and Future Work ............................................36 Cloud Security .............................................................................10 RightPath – DOE/NNSA Cloud Strategy ...........................11 PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY ..............38 Vision ..............................................................................................38
  • The United States Nuclear Weapon Program: A

    The United States Nuclear Weapon Program: A

    DOE/ES-0005 (Draft) 67521 wees ce eee ee ee THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WEAPON PROGRAM: | A SUMMARYHISTORY '<) March 1983 U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary, Management and Administration Office of The Executive Secretariat History Division DOE/ES-0005 (Draft) THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR | WEAPON PROGRAM: A SUMMARY HISTORY © | « By: Roger M. Anders Archivist With: Jack M. Holl Alice L. Buck Prentice C. Dean March 1983 U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary, Management and Administration Office of The Executive Secretariat History Division Washington, D.C. 20585 The Department of Energy Organization Act of 1977 brought together for the first time in one department most of the Federal Government's energy programs. With these programs came a score of organizational entities, each with its owm history and traditions, from a dozen depart- ‘ments and independent agencies. The History Division has prepared a series of pamphlets on The Institutional Origins of the Department of Energy. Each pamphlet explains the history, goals, and achievements of @ predecessor agency or a major program of the Department of Energy. This pamphlet, which replaces Roger M. Anders' previous booklet cn "The Office of Military Application," traces the history of the United States nuclear weapon program from its inception during World War II to the present. Nuclear weapons form the core of America's modern defenses. anders! history describes the truly formidable efforts of «ne Atomic Energy Commission, the Energy Research and Develogment Administration, and the Departmr to create a diverse anc sophisticated arsenal of nuclear 2 accomplishments of these agencies and their plants and lak : created an “atomic shieic" which protects America today.
  • Federal Register/Vol. 69, No. 162/Monday, August 23, 2004

    Federal Register/Vol. 69, No. 162/Monday, August 23, 2004

    Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 162 / Monday, August 23, 2004 / Notices 51825 Format (PDF) on the Internet at the Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, and oxidation process). Other following site: http://www.ed.gov/news/ SW., Washington, DC 20585; e-mail: corrections include: B&T Metals (OH) fedregister. [email protected]; toll free: (the DOE designation was in error and To use PDF you must have Adobe 1–877–447–9756; URL: http:// has been removed), Foote Mineral (PA) Acrobat Reader, which is available free www.eh.doe.gov/advocacy/. (the BE designation has been on the at this site. If you have questions about SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: program’s Web site (noted below) since using PDF, call the U.S. Government inception, but was inadvertently Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1– Purpose missing from the Federal Register 888–293–6498; or in the Washington, The Energy Employees Occupational notice), Swenson Evaporator (is located DC, area at (202) 512–1530. Illness Compensation Program Act of in Harvey, not Chicago, IL) and C.H. 2000 (‘‘Act’’), Title 36 of Public Law Schnorr, PA (previously Schnoor). This Note: The official version of this document 106–398, establishes a program to is the document published in the Federal notice also deletes the listing for Ledoux Register. Free Internet access to the official provide compensation to individuals (NY) entirely because it was learned that edition of the Federal Register and the Code who developed illnesses as a result of no radioactivity was used at that of Federal Regulations is available on GPO their employment in nuclear weapons location.
  • David Lilienthal, the Atomic Energy Commission, and The

    David Lilienthal, the Atomic Energy Commission, and The

    AGAINST A STEAMROLLER: DAVID LILIENTHAL, THE ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION, AND THE CONFLICT OVER MILITARIZATION DURING EARLY COLD WAR A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State Polytechnic University, Pomona In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts In History By Stephen Michael Schumacher 2004 ii SIGNATURE PAGE THESIS: AGAINST A STEAMROLLER: DAVID LILIENTHAL, THE ATOMIC ENERGYCOMMISSION, AND THE CONFLICT OVER MILITARIZATION DURING EARLY COLD WAR AUTHOR: Stephen Michael Schumacher DATE SUBMITTED: _______________________________________ Department of History Dr. Zuoyue Wang _______________________________________ Thesis Committee Chair History Dr. Stephen F. Englehart _______________________________________ History Dr. John A. Moore, Jr. _______________________________________ History iii ABSTRACT When David E. Lilienthal, chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission, lost his battle to stop the development of the hydrogen bomb in 1950, he used the term “steamroller” to illustrate the overwhelming forces which opposed him. Throughout his term as AEC chairman (1946-1950), Lilienthal fought the “steamroller” that came to represent not only the drive toward the hydrogen bomb but a militarization of American society in general. Beginning with his early skirmishes with General Leslie R. Groves, continuing with his successful campaign to keep the nation’s atomic arsenal in the custody of a civilian agency and concluding with his failed efforts in combating the H-bomb, Lilienthal persistently challenged militarization at every turn. But Lilienthal’s battles against militarization were not limited to his AEC days. Both before and after his AEC chairmanship he took stances which went against the grain of militarization. Historically, Lilienthal’s stringent and sustained opposition to the “steamroller” of militarization helped pave the way for the questioning of military technology during the counter-culture movement in the 1960s and 1970s.
  • President Harry S Truman's Office Files, 1945–1953

    President Harry S Truman's Office Files, 1945–1953

    A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of RESEARCH COLLECTIONS IN AMERICAN POLITICS Microforms from Major Archival and Manuscript Collections General Editor: William E. Leuchtenburg PRESIDENT HARRY S TRUMAN’S OFFICE FILES, 1945–1953 Part 2: Correspondence File UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of RESEARCH COLLECTIONS IN AMERICAN POLITICS Microforms from Major Archival and Manuscript Collections General Editor: William E. Leuchtenburg PRESIDENT HARRY S TRUMAN’S OFFICE FILES, 1945–1953 Part 2: Correspondence File Project Coordinators Gary Hoag Paul Kesaris Robert E. Lester Guide compiled by David W. Loving A microfilm project of UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA An Imprint of CIS 4520 East-West Highway • Bethesda, Maryland 20814-3389 LCCN: 90-956100 Copyright© 1989 by University Publications of America. All rights reserved. ISBN 1-55655-151-7. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................................ v Scope and Content Note ....................................................................................................... xi Source and Editorial Note ..................................................................................................... xiii Reel Index Reel 1 A–Atomic Energy Control Commission, United Nations ......................................... 1 Reel 2 Attlee, Clement R.–Benton, William ........................................................................ 2 Reel 3 Bowles, Chester–Chronological
  • The Atomic Energy Commission

    The Atomic Energy Commission

    The Atomic Energy Commission By Alice Buck July 1983 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Management Office of the Executive Secretariat Office of History and Heritage Resources Introduction Almost a year after World War II ended, Congress established the United States Atomic Energy Commission to foster and control the peacetime development of atomic science and technology. Reflecting America's postwar optimism, Congress declared that atomic energy should be employed not only in the Nation's defense, but also to promote world peace, improve the public welfare, and strengthen free competition in private enterprise. After long months of intensive debate among politicians, military planners and atomic scientists, President Harry S. Truman confirmed the civilian control of atomic energy by signing the Atomic Energy Act on August 1, 1946.(1) The provisions of the new Act bore the imprint of the American plan for international control presented to the United Nations Atomic Energy Commission two months earlier by U.S. Representative Bernard Baruch. Although the Baruch proposal for a multinational corporation to develop the peaceful uses of atomic energy failed to win the necessary Soviet support, the concept of combining development, production, and control in one agency found acceptance in the domestic legislation creating the United States Atomic Energy Commission.(2) Congress gave the new civilian Commission extraordinary power and independence to carry out its awesome responsibilities. Five Commissioners appointed by the President would exercise authority for the operation of the Commission, while a general manager, also appointed by the President, would serve as chief executive officer. To provide the Commission exceptional freedom in hiring scientists and professionals, Commission employees would be exempt from the Civil Service system.
  • A History of the Atomic Energy Commission

    A History of the Atomic Energy Commission

    DoE/Es-ooo3/l 410896 . A HISTORY OF THE ATOhtlC ENERGY COMMISSION by: Alice L. Buck July 19= U.S. Depa~ment of Energy - Assistant Secreta~, Management and Administration Otilce of The Executive Secretariat History Division Washington, D. C.20W5 . To W, B. McCOOI, Secretaw to the Commission, a dedicated public official whose imaginative leadership and foresight in administering the Office of the Secretary; whose initiative in establishing and supporting within his staff a history program for the preparation of an official history of the Commission; and whose skill in developing a highly sucessful manage- ment program for bringing outstanding young men and women into the federal service, all contributed to making the Executive Secretariat a model for administering complex and technical programs. ovA Department of Ener~ Washington, D.C. 20585 The Department of Energy Organization Act of 1977 brought together for the first time in one department most of the Federal Government’s energv programs. ~fi?iththese ~roarams. came a score of organizational entltiesl each with its own history and traditions, from a dozen departments and independent aqencies. The Historv Division has prepared a series of pamphlets on The Institutional Origins of the Department of Energy. Fach pamphlet explains the history, qoals, and achievements of a predecessor aqencv of the Department of Energy. One purpose of the series is to provide a handv reference work which traces the organizational antecedents of the major programs and offices of the Department. In several instances the search for materials has resulted in the preservation of valuable historical records that otherwise might have been lost or destroyed.
  • 2018 Annual Report

    2018 Annual Report

    2018 Annual Report Nevada Test Site Historical Foundation Organizational Profile VISION Members of the Nevada Test Site Historical Foundation work as responsible stewards of the U.S. defense legacy by preserving the history of the Nevada Test Site and assuring public access by future generations to resources that define the nation’s nuclear testing program. MISSION NEVADA TEST SITE HISTORICAL FOUNDATION The mission of the Nevada Test Site Historical Foundation is to preserve and foster public accessi- bility to the history associated with the Nevada Test Site and the nation’s nuclear weapons testing program. The NTS Foundation promotes and supports cultural, educational, and scientific program- ming to encourage the development and public exchange of views regarding the Nevada Test Site and its impact on the nation. NATIONAL ATOMIC TESTING MUSEUM The mission of the National Atomic Testing Museum is to objectively preserve and interpret the nuclear history of the Nevada Test Site and to educate and inform current and future generations about its impact on 21st Century nuclear science and the world. CORE VALUES The Foundation is dedicated to enhancing and supporting the programs and activities depicting the history of our nation’s nuclear weapons testing program and recognizing the contribution of its people. In so doing, we affirm our dedication by: » Applying creativity and commitment in support of activities that foster open communication and public awareness » Pledging ourselves to high standards of integrity and ethics in accomplishing our work » Providing a model of excellence in all that we do for others to emulate » Instilling a spirit of teamwork and cooperation within the Foundation and among partners » Encouraging and rewarding innovation and risk-taking GOVERNANCE The Nevada Test Site Historical Foundation management is vested in a Board of Trustees.
  • The Isotopic Signature of Fallout North Pacific Plutonium In

    The Isotopic Signature of Fallout North Pacific Plutonium In

    J. Environ. Radioactivity, Vol. 36, No. I, pp. 69-83, 1997 0 1997 Elsevier Science LImited All rights reserved. Printed in Ireland PII: SO265-931X(96)00071-9 0265-931X/97 $17.00 + 0.00 ELSEVIER The Isotopic Signature of Fallout Plutonium in the North Pacific Ken 0. Buesseler Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA (Received 27 June 1996; accepted 15 August 1996) ABSTRACT Plutonium analyses of a dated coral record from the French Frigate Shoals in the central North Pacific indicate that there are two major sources of PM in this basin: close-in (troposphertc) fallout from nuclear weapons testing at the Pact& Proving Grounds in the Marshall Islands in the 1950s and global (stratospheric) fallout which peaked in 1962. Furthermore, the 240Pu/239Pu atom ratio of fallout ,from the Pacific Proving Grounds is characteristically higher (0.24) than that of global jhllout Pu (O.l8+I9). Seawater and sediment samples from the North Pacific exhibit a wide range of “40Pu/239Pu values (0.19-+34), with a trend towards higher ratios in the subsurface waters and sediment. Deep water 240Pul”39Pu ratios are higher in the vicinity of the Marshall Islands relative to stations further from this close-in fallout source. These preli- minary data suggest that fallout Pu from the Pacific Proving Grounds is more rapidly removed from the surface waters than is global fallout Pu. Plutonium geochemistry appears to be related to the physical/chemical form of PM-bearing particles generated by dtfferent ,fallout sources. (‘ 1997 Elsevier Science Limited. INTRODUCTION The input of fallout plutonium (Pu) from atmospheric nuclear weapons testing is the largest source of Pu to the environment, including the oceans (Harley, 1980; Perkins & Thomas, 1980).