DOCSLIB.ORG

Community Redevelopment Plan 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Community Redevelopment Plan 2018 City of Gulf Breeze COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 2018 1 A. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 4 2. Economic Environment .................................................................................................. 24 1. City of Gulf Breeze Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) ................................ 4 3. Regulatory Environment ................................................................................................ 24 a. Conditions Determining the Need for Redevelopment ....................................... 5 H. STRATEGIES AND RECOMMENDATION ................................................................. 25 b. Comprehensive Plan Objectives for Redevelopment ........................................... 5 1. Strategies for Addressing Blight Conditions -1990 ................................................. 25 2. Purpose of the 2018 Community Redevelopment Plan Update ............................... 5 2. Community Redevelopment Objectives ..................................................................... 25 B. COMMUNITY VISION.......................................................................................................... 7 3. Strategies and Recommendations for Addressing Blight Conditions .................. 25 1. “Most Livable City Plan” ................................................................................................. 7 4. Local Funding Sources ................................................................................................... 29 2. Community Workshops 2006 .......................................................................................... 8 I. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN .............................................................................................. 33 3. “Vision 2020” ..................................................................................................................... 9 J. APPENDIX A: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ......................................................................... 36 C. LAND USE ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................ 10 K. APPENDIX B: LEGAL DESCRIPTION MAP BOUNDARIES ................................ 39 1. Existing Land Use ............................................................................................................ 10 L. APPENDIX C: SUMMARIZED SPECIAL DISTRICT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND CONTACT INFORMATION .............................................. 40 a. Institutional ................................................................................................................. 10 M. APPENDIX D: MARCH 30, 2006 MEETING ROSTER ............................................. 49 b. Residential................................................................................................................... 10 N. APPENDIX E: MAY 11, 2006 MEETING ROSTER ................................................... 52 c. Office and Commercial Land Use ......................................................................... 11 O. APPENDIX F: MAY 11, 2006 MEETING WEIGHTED RESULTS ........................ 53 d. Vacant Land Use ....................................................................................................... 11 P. APPENDIX G: COST ESTIMATING STREETSCAPE COMPONENTS .............. 55 2. Future Land Use/Zoning in the CRA ........................................................................... 12 D. INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................................................................ 15 1. Potable Water .................................................................................................................... 15 2. Sanitary Sewer .................................................................................................................. 15 3. Stormwater Management System ................................................................................. 16 4. Natural Gas ........................................................................................................................ 16 5. Electricity/Power Lines ................................................................................................... 17 E. TRANSPORTATION ............................................................................................................ 18 1. Sidewalks and Bike Trails .............................................................................................. 18 2. Transit ................................................................................................................................. 19 3. Airports ............................................................................................................................... 19 F. ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................. 20 1. Employment Sectors ........................................................................................................ 20 2. Investment and Development in the CRA – 1997 - 2016 ........................................ 20 3. Economic Development, Workforce and Business Support Service Providers .. 22 G. OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES FACING THE CRA ................................. 24 1. Physical Environment...................................................................................................... 24 2 List of Tables List of Maps Table 1: Community Feedback - 2012 .................................................................................................7 Map 1: Location Map - City of Gulf Breeze ....................................................................................... 4 Table 2: Indicators of Success - 2012 ..................................................................................................7 Map 2: City of Gulf Breeze CRA Area ................................................................................................ 5 Table 3: Community Priorities - 2006 ...................................................................................................8 Map 3: CRA Existing Land Use ......................................................................................................... 10 Table 3: SWOT Analysis – 2008 ............................................................................................................9 Map 4: Major Office and Commercial Centers in the CRA ........................................................... 11 Table 4: Vision 2020 Goals and Objectives .........................................................................................9 Map 5: CRA Vacant Land Use ............................................................................................................ 12 Table 5: Existing Land Use in the CRA ............................................................................................ 10 Map 6: City of Gulf Breeze Adopted Future Land Use Map ......................................................... 13 Table 6: Institutional Land Use in the CRA ..................................................................................... 10 Map 7: City of Gulf Breeze Adopted Zoning Map .......................................................................... 14 Table 7: Residential Land Use in the CRA ........................................................................................ 10 Map 8: CRA Potable Water System ................................................................................................... 15 Table 8: Office and Commercial Land Use in the CRA ................................................................. 11 Map 9: CRA Sanitary Sewer System ................................................................................................... 15 Table 9: Vacant Land Use in the CRA .............................................................................................. 11 Map 10: CRA Stormwater Management System .............................................................................. 16 Table 10: Future Land Use Categories in the CRA ......................................................................... 12 Map 11: CRA Natural Gas System ..................................................................................................... 17 Table 11: Zoning Categories in the CRA .......................................................................................... 12 Map 12: Trails in Gulf Breeze and Vicinity ....................................................................................... 19 Table 12: Roadways and Level of Service in the CRA .................................................................... 18 Map 13: Location of CRA Investment .............................................................................................. 22 Table 13: Regional Demographics ..................................................................................................... 20 Map 14: Proposed Connector Roadways .......................................................................................... 26 Table 14: CRA Investment 1990-2016 .............................................................................................. 21 Table 15: CRA TIF Revenue Projections .......................................................................................... 29 Table 16: Implementation Plan with Cost Estimates .....................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Ron Wyden GAO U.S. Senate April 2002 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Decisionmaking Process for Its Route and Service Proposals GAO-02-398 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 Status of the Growth Strategy 6 Amtrak Overestimated Expected Mail and Express Revenue 7 Amtrak Encountered Substantial Difficulties in Expanding Service Over Freight Railroad Tracks 9 Conclusions 13 Recommendation for Executive Action 13 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 13 Scope and Methodology 16 Appendix I Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes, Fiscal Year 2001 18 Appendix II Amtrak Route Actions, January 1995 Through December 2001 20 Appendix III Planned Route and Service Actions Included in the Network Growth Strategy 22 Appendix IV Amtrak’s Process for Evaluating Route and Service Proposals 23 Amtrak’s Consideration of Operating Revenue and Direct Costs 23 Consideration of Capital Costs and Other Financial Issues 24 Appendix V Market-Based Network Analysis Models Used to Estimate Ridership, Revenues, and Costs 26 Models Used to Estimate Ridership and Revenue 26 Models Used to Estimate Costs 27 Page i GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking Appendix VI Comments from the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 28 GAO’s Evaluation 37 Tables Table 1: Status of Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions, as of December 31, 2001 7 Table 2: Operating Profit (Loss), Operating Ratio, and Profit (Loss) per Passenger of Each Amtrak Route, Fiscal Year 2001, Ranked by Profit (Loss) 18 Table 3: Planned Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions 22 Figure Figure 1: Amtrak’s Route System, as of December 2001 4 Page ii GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 April 12, 2002 The Honorable Ron Wyden United States Senate Dear Senator Wyden: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is the nation’s intercity passenger rail operator.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT of INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION in Re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMEN
    USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 1 of 354 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION ) Case No. 3:05-MD-527 RLM In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE ) (MDL 1700) SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT ) PRACTICES LITIGATION ) ) ) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ) ) Carlene Craig, et. al. v. FedEx Case No. 3:05-cv-530 RLM ) Ground Package Systems, Inc., ) ) PROPOSED FINAL APPROVAL ORDER This matter came before the Court for hearing on March 11, 2019, to consider final approval of the proposed ERISA Class Action Settlement reached by and between Plaintiffs Leo Rittenhouse, Jeff Bramlage, Lawrence Liable, Kent Whistler, Mike Moore, Keith Berry, Matthew Cook, Heidi Law, Sylvia O’Brien, Neal Bergkamp, and Dominic Lupo1 (collectively, “the Named Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and the Certified Class, and Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (“FXG”) (collectively, “the Parties”), the terms of which Settlement are set forth in the Class Action Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) attached as Exhibit A to the Joint Declaration of Co-Lead Counsel in support of Preliminary Approval of the Kansas Class Action 1 Carlene Craig withdrew as a Named Plaintiff on November 29, 2006. See MDL Doc. No. 409. Named Plaintiffs Ronald Perry and Alan Pacheco are not movants for final approval and filed an objection [MDL Doc. Nos. 3251/3261]. USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 2 of 354 Settlement [MDL Doc. No. 3154-1]. Also before the Court is ERISA Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees and for Payment of Service Awards to the Named Plaintiffs, filed with the Court on October 19, 2018 [MDL Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Rosa Sound Water Quality Improvement Program Public Participation
    State of Florida State Expenditure Plan Initial SEP Program RESTORE Act Compliance SANTA ROSA COUNTY Santa Rosa Sound Water Quality Improvement Program Public Participation PROJECT NO. 2-1 Project Description OVERVIEW AND LOCATION Financial Integrity The Santa Rosa Sound Water Quality Improvement Program comprises three components that will directly contribute to the restoration of water quality in Santa Rosa Sound by reducing loads of nutrients, bacteria, and heavy metals delivered to the sound. The frst two components of the program will expand the existing centralized sewer system to allow for the abandonment Overall Consistency of 758 septic systems in two areas on the Fairpoint Peninsula. The third component involves the relocation of the effuent outfall from the Navarre Beach Wastewater Treatment Facility (NBWWTF) to eliminate the discharge of up to 900,000 gallons per day (gpd) of treated effuent into Santa Rosa Sound. This program will be implemented in southeastern Santa Rosa County (see Figure 2-1A). Proposed Projects NEED AND JUSTIFICATION Santa Rosa Sound is about 35 miles long, connecting the Pensacola Bay estuary to Choctawhatchee Bay. It is bordered along much of its northern edge by the Fairpoint Peninsula and is separated from the Gulf of Mexico by Figure 2-1A. Location of Santa Rosa Sound Water Quality Santa Rosa Island to the south. Santa Rosa Island is part Improvement Program components in Santa Rosa County. of the Gulf Islands National Seashore, and the associated Implementation waters of the sound are designated Outstanding Florida Waters. Santa Rosa Sound supports seagrass beds, which are important habitat and foraging areas for numerous fsh and invertebrate species, including many of commercial and recreational signifcance.
    [Show full text]
  • RESTORE ACT Direct Component Multiyear Plan Matrix — Department of the Treasury OMB Approval No
    RESTORE ACT Direct Component Multiyear Plan Matrix — Department of the Treasury OMB Approval No. 1505-0250 Applicant Name: Santa Rosa County, FL 1. MULTIYEAR PLAN VERSION (INITIAL OR AMENDMENT NUMBER): Initial 2a. DATE OF INITIAL MULTIYEAR PLAN ACCEPTANCE (mm/dd/yyyy): n/a 2b. DATE OF LAST MULTIYEAR PLAN ACCEPTANCE: n/a 3. CUMULATIVE DIRECT COMPONENT ALLOCATION AVAILABLE FOR DISTRIBUTION TO APPLICANT: $5,093,598.25 4. TOTAL ALLOCATIONS PLUS KNOWN FUNDS NOT YET DEPOSITED IN TRUST FUND FOR DIRECT COMPONENT: $29,179,124.98 5. Primary Direct Component Eligible 8. Estimated Total Funding Contributions For Proposed Activity(ies)(refer to Instructions) 9. Proposed Start Date 10. Proposed End Date Activity Further Described in Application 6. Activity Title (Static Field) 7. Location (Static Field) 11. Status (refer to Instructions) 8a. Direct Component 8b. Other RESTORE Act 8c. Other Third Party 8d. Total Contribution mm/dd/yyyy mm/dd/yyyy (Static Field) Contribution Contribution Contribution Infrastructure projects benefitting Dirt Road Paving Santa Rosa County, FL $525,000.00 $670,000.00 $1,195,000.00 08-2017 08-2019 the economy or ecological Districts 1, 4, 5 resources, including port infrastructure Infrastructure projects benefitting Driftwood, Navy Cove, Berry City of Gulf Breeze $356,540.00 $356,540.00 $713,080.00 08-2017 08-2019 the economy or ecological Stormwater Improvements resources, including port infrastructure Restoration and protection of the Santa Rosa County Oyster Santa Rosa County, FL $300,000.00 $25,000.00 $325,000.00 08-2017
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Security Disclosure
    MUNICIPAL SECURITY DISCLOSURE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 For the City of Miami Beach, Florida and The Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency (A Component Unit of the City of Miami Beach, Florida) MUNICIPAL SECURITY DISCLOSURE City of Miami Beach, Florida For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2019 Prepared by: The City of Miami Beach Finance Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida • 33139 Tel: (305) 673 – 7466 • Fax: (305) 673 – 7795 Last updated July 13, 2020 City of Miami Beach, Florida Report of Annual Financial Information For Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2019 This Report of Annual Financial Information is being filed with the Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA), a service of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB). The following is a list of all outstanding bonds and other obligations for the City of Miami Beach at September 30, 2019, in accordance with provisions regarding continuing disclosure set forth in: Outstanding Bonds Original Description Resolution Resolution Commitment Amount Number Date Date $22,500,000 Gulf Breeze Fixed Rate Loan, Series 1985E No. 2001-24500 June 26, 2001 August 1, 2001 (used to repay a portion of the outstanding principal from the Sunshine State Loan and renovation and improvement of two City owned golf courses and their related facilities), (“2001 Gulf Breeze Loan”) $62,465,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003 (used No. 2003-25240 June 11, 2003 July 22, 2003 to improve neighborhood infrastructure in the City, consisting of streetscape and traffic calming measures, shoreline stabilization, Fire Safety Projects and Beaches Projects) (Note: The outstanding balance on the above City of Miami Beach, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003 were fully refunded by the Series 2019 bonds at September 30, 2019.) $13,590,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Pensacola Bay System EPA Report
    EPA/600/R-16/169 | August 2016 | www.epa.gov/research Environmental Quality of the Pensacola Bay System: Retrospective Review for Future Resource Management and Rehabilitation Office of Research and Development 1 EPA/600/R-16/169 August 2016 Environmental Quality of the Pensacola Bay System: Retrospective Review for Future Resource Management and Rehabilitation by Michael A. Lewis Gulf Ecology Division National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory Gulf Breeze, FL 32561 J. Taylor Kirschenfeld Water Quality and Land Management Division Escambia County Pensacola, FL 32503 Traci Goodhart West Florida Regional Planning Council Pensacola, FL 32514 National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gulf Breeze, FL. 32561 i Notice The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through its Office of Research and Development (ORD) funded and collaborated in the research described herein with representatives from Escambia County’s Water Quality and Land Management Division and the West Florida Regional Planning Council. It has been subjected to the Agency’s peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. This is a contribution to the EPA ORD Sustainable and Healthy Communities Research Program. The appropriate citation for this report is: Lewis, Michael, J. Taylor Kirschenfeld, and Traci Goodheart. Environmental Quality of the Pensacola Bay System: Retrospective Review for Future Resource Management and Rehabilitation. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Gulf Breeze, FL, EPA/600/R-16/169, 2016. ii Foreword This report supports EPA’s Sustainable and Healthy Communities Research Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Gulf Coast Working Group Report to Congress
    Gulf Coast Working Group Report to Congress Prepared for: Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives Submitted by: The Gulf Coast Working Group Final Report July 2017 Table of Contents 1 OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................. 1 2 BACKGROUND AND HISTORY ................................................................................................. 1 2.1 DESCRIPTION OF GCWG SCOPE OF WORK ...................................................................... 1 2.1.1 THE FAST ACT AND RESPONSE TO CONGRESS ............................................................... 1 2.1.2 GOALS .............................................................................................................................. 2 2.1.3 REPORT ORGANIZATION .................................................................................................. 2 2.2 HISTORY .......................................................................................................................... 2 2.2.1 PREVIOUS PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE TO THE GULF COAST ........................................... 2 2.2.2 RECENT HISTORY OF LOCAL SUPPORT TO RESTORE PASSENGER SERVICE .................... 4 2.3 REGIONAL ECONOMIC SUMMARY .................................................................................... 4 2.3.1 POTENTIAL ECONOMIC BENEFITS ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Panhandle Birding Trail
    The Great Florida Birding Trail is a project of the Florida Fish and Wildlife PANHANDLE FLORIDA Conservation Commission BIRDING TRAIL In partnership with : Wildlife Foundation of Florida U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Florida Park Service Florida Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Many thanks to our generous sponsors : www.gulfpower.com The Great Florida Birding Trail www.nfwf.org www.FloridaBirdingTrail.com 05/06 Printed on recycled paper Getting Started... Ciity Locator Loaner optics are available free of charge at all Gateways, as well as at City Map City Map additional sites as marked in the site Apalachicola I Laguna Beach G descriptions! Bristol J Marianna F Carrabelle I Mexico Beach H Chattahoochee J Milton C Trail Tips Chipley F Panama City G When birding: Crawfordville M Pensacola B Crestview C Port St. Joe H • Take sunscreen, water and bug spray. De Funiak Springs E Quincy K • Make reservations in advance for "by-appointment Destin D Sopchoppy M only" sites. Ft. Walton Beach D St. Marks M • Check seasonality of site; are you visiting at the Grayton Beach D Sumatra I right time of year? Gulf Beach A Tallahassee L Gulf Breeze B Birder Vocabulary Some words used in this guide are specific to bird- How were these sites selected? ers and birdwatching. Bone-up on the following lingo Each of the sites in this guide was chosen for its bird- so you’ll blend in at your next birding dinner party! watching characteristics, accessibility and ability to Birding by ear: the ability to identify birds by their withstand birder use.
    [Show full text]
  • Gulf Islands National Seashore National Park Service Gulf Islands Florida and Mississippi U.S
    Gulf Islands National Seashore National Park Service Gulf Islands Florida and Mississippi U.S. Department of the Interior Treasures Along the Gulf Coast NPS Gulf Islands National Seashore is a place of many riches—blue- of white sand carried seaward by rivers draining from the Appa- purpose of cultivating live oaks, used for shipbuilding. To help How Barrier Islands Change green, sparkling waters, magnificent white beaches, and fertile lachian Mountains. During violent storms the islands function as defend the mainland against foreign invasion, the government All theories about the barrier islands’ formation involve waves, coastal marshes. It stretches 160 miles along the northern coast barriers, blocking ocean waves that would otherwise strike the began fortifying Pensacola in 1829, and Ship Island, Mississippi, winds, and fluctuating sea levels. The islands move steadily of the Gulf of Mexico in Florida and Mississippi, and includes mainland with greater force. in 1859. From Ship Island’s Fort Massachusetts the Union Army westward as longshore currents wear away their eastern ends barrier islands, maritime forests, historic forts, bayous, and staged the capture of New Orleans in 1862. By the end of the and build up the western ends. Shifting winds sculpt the dunes. marine habitat. Evidence of the American Indians who settled in the forests and Civil War new inventions like rifled cannon and ironclad warships Storms also alter islands’ shapes when waves wash over the sur- marshes helps archeologists understand the native peoples’ long called for new defenses. The US Army Coast Artillery Corps built faces and rearrange sand. Such constant changes are slowed Congress established the national seashore in 1971 to protect history.
    [Show full text]
  • South Santa Rosa Bicycle-Pedestrian Plan
    South Santa Rosa Bicycle-Pedestrian Plan 1 Approved: August 27, 2015 PREPARED FOR SANTA ROSA COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BY WEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL IN CONJUNCTION WITH SANTA ROSA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES For information regarding this document, please contact: Kristen A. Shell, AICP | Senior Planner Santa Rosa County Development Services 6051 Old Bagdad Highway, Suite 202 | Milton, FL 32583 South End Phone (MWF) 850-983-1816 | North End Phone (TTH) 850-981-7078 | Fax: (850) 983-9874 [email protected] The preparation of this report has been financed through grant funding from the Department of Economic Opportunity. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 TASK ONE: CITIZEN PARTICIPATION ...................................................................................................................................... 4 TASK TWO: IDENTIFICATION OF GOALS AND PRIORITIZATION OBJECTIVES ................................................................. 5 RANKING INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS ................................................................................ 7 PRIORITIZED GOALS ........................................................................................................................... 15 TASK THREE: EXISTING AND PLANNED BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES ANALYSIS ............................................. 16 PLANNED PROJECTS .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gulf Breeze 1 the Park Is Open 24 Hours a Day, 365 Days a Malaquite the Lower National Park Service Year
    National Park Service Park News U.S. Department of the Interior The offi cial newspaper of Padre Island National Seashore The GulGulff BrBreezeeeze Fall 2006 The parkpark protectsprotects the longelongestst sectionsection of undevelopedundeveloped barrier island in the worworld,ld, preservingpreserving rrareare ccoastaloastal prprairie;airie; a ccomplex,omplex, dynamicdynamic dune system;system; and the Laguna Madre,Madre, one of the fewfew hhypersalineypersaline lagoon envirenvironmentsonments llefteft iinn ththee wworld.orld. Superintendent’s WelcomeRecord Year for Endangered Look inside... WELCOME TO PADRE ISLAND Welcome.......................1 National Seashore, one of the most Kemp’s Ridley Sea Turtle Nesting By Donna J. Shaver, Ph.D., Chief, Division of Sea Turtle Science and Recovery special places of the 390 units of the Kemp’s Ridley Turtle......1 National Park Service (NPS). We PADRE ISLAND NATIONAL SEASHORE HAS WORKED DILIGENTLY FOR NEARLY trust that you will have a wonderful Park Information..........2 time as you explore and experience three decades to help save the world’s most endangered sea turtle species from extinction. A this great park. record 64 Kemp’s ridley nests were found at the National Seashore during 2006, exceeding Oil and Gas...................3 the number found in the entire state during 2005. The success of our Kemp’s Ridley Sea Congress established Padre Island Turtle Recovery Program during 2006 is one more step that helps secure the future of this Reptiles.........................4 National Seashore on September 28, magnifi cent species at Padre Island National Seashore and throughout the world. 1962 to “save and preserve, for purpose of public recreation, Feeding Wildlife...........4 benefi t, and inspiration, a portion of the diminishing Long-term recovery eff orts making a diff erence seashore of the United States that remains undeveloped”.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Accreditation Report Santa Rosa County School District Executive Summary SY 2016-2017 Page 1 © 2017 Advance Education, Inc. All rights reserved unless otherwise granted by written agreement. Accreditation Report Santa Rosa County School District Introduction Every school system has its own story to tell. The context in which teaching and learning takes place influences the processes and procedures by which the school system makes decisions around curriculum, instruction, and assessment. The context also impacts the way a school system stays faithful to its vision. Many factors contribute to the overall narrative such as an identification of stakeholders, a description of stakeholder engagement, the trends and issues affecting the school system, and the kinds of programs and services that a school system implements to support student learning. The purpose of the Executive Summary (ES) is to provide a school system with an opportunity to describe in narrative form the strengths and challenges it encounters. By doing so, the public and members of the community will have a more complete picture of how the school system perceives itself and the process of self-reflection for continuous improvement. This summary is structured for the school system to reflect on how it provides teaching and learning on a day to day basis. SY 2016-2017 Page 2 © 2017 Advance Education, Inc. All rights reserved unless otherwise granted by written agreement. Accreditation Report Santa Rosa County School District Description of the School System Describe the school system's size, community/communities, location, and changes it has experienced in the last three years. Include demographic information about the students, staff, and community at large.
    [Show full text]