Fiscal Year 2019 Annual Report to the Citizens Of
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Santa Rosa Sound Water Quality Improvement Program Public Participation
State of Florida State Expenditure Plan Initial SEP Program RESTORE Act Compliance SANTA ROSA COUNTY Santa Rosa Sound Water Quality Improvement Program Public Participation PROJECT NO. 2-1 Project Description OVERVIEW AND LOCATION Financial Integrity The Santa Rosa Sound Water Quality Improvement Program comprises three components that will directly contribute to the restoration of water quality in Santa Rosa Sound by reducing loads of nutrients, bacteria, and heavy metals delivered to the sound. The frst two components of the program will expand the existing centralized sewer system to allow for the abandonment Overall Consistency of 758 septic systems in two areas on the Fairpoint Peninsula. The third component involves the relocation of the effuent outfall from the Navarre Beach Wastewater Treatment Facility (NBWWTF) to eliminate the discharge of up to 900,000 gallons per day (gpd) of treated effuent into Santa Rosa Sound. This program will be implemented in southeastern Santa Rosa County (see Figure 2-1A). Proposed Projects NEED AND JUSTIFICATION Santa Rosa Sound is about 35 miles long, connecting the Pensacola Bay estuary to Choctawhatchee Bay. It is bordered along much of its northern edge by the Fairpoint Peninsula and is separated from the Gulf of Mexico by Figure 2-1A. Location of Santa Rosa Sound Water Quality Santa Rosa Island to the south. Santa Rosa Island is part Improvement Program components in Santa Rosa County. of the Gulf Islands National Seashore, and the associated Implementation waters of the sound are designated Outstanding Florida Waters. Santa Rosa Sound supports seagrass beds, which are important habitat and foraging areas for numerous fsh and invertebrate species, including many of commercial and recreational signifcance. -
Pensacola Bay System EPA Report
EPA/600/R-16/169 | August 2016 | www.epa.gov/research Environmental Quality of the Pensacola Bay System: Retrospective Review for Future Resource Management and Rehabilitation Office of Research and Development 1 EPA/600/R-16/169 August 2016 Environmental Quality of the Pensacola Bay System: Retrospective Review for Future Resource Management and Rehabilitation by Michael A. Lewis Gulf Ecology Division National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory Gulf Breeze, FL 32561 J. Taylor Kirschenfeld Water Quality and Land Management Division Escambia County Pensacola, FL 32503 Traci Goodhart West Florida Regional Planning Council Pensacola, FL 32514 National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gulf Breeze, FL. 32561 i Notice The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through its Office of Research and Development (ORD) funded and collaborated in the research described herein with representatives from Escambia County’s Water Quality and Land Management Division and the West Florida Regional Planning Council. It has been subjected to the Agency’s peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. This is a contribution to the EPA ORD Sustainable and Healthy Communities Research Program. The appropriate citation for this report is: Lewis, Michael, J. Taylor Kirschenfeld, and Traci Goodheart. Environmental Quality of the Pensacola Bay System: Retrospective Review for Future Resource Management and Rehabilitation. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Gulf Breeze, FL, EPA/600/R-16/169, 2016. ii Foreword This report supports EPA’s Sustainable and Healthy Communities Research Program. -
Executive Summary
Accreditation Report Santa Rosa County School District Executive Summary SY 2016-2017 Page 1 © 2017 Advance Education, Inc. All rights reserved unless otherwise granted by written agreement. Accreditation Report Santa Rosa County School District Introduction Every school system has its own story to tell. The context in which teaching and learning takes place influences the processes and procedures by which the school system makes decisions around curriculum, instruction, and assessment. The context also impacts the way a school system stays faithful to its vision. Many factors contribute to the overall narrative such as an identification of stakeholders, a description of stakeholder engagement, the trends and issues affecting the school system, and the kinds of programs and services that a school system implements to support student learning. The purpose of the Executive Summary (ES) is to provide a school system with an opportunity to describe in narrative form the strengths and challenges it encounters. By doing so, the public and members of the community will have a more complete picture of how the school system perceives itself and the process of self-reflection for continuous improvement. This summary is structured for the school system to reflect on how it provides teaching and learning on a day to day basis. SY 2016-2017 Page 2 © 2017 Advance Education, Inc. All rights reserved unless otherwise granted by written agreement. Accreditation Report Santa Rosa County School District Description of the School System Describe the school system's size, community/communities, location, and changes it has experienced in the last three years. Include demographic information about the students, staff, and community at large. -
Hurricane Dennis & Hurricane Katrina
Hurricane Dennis & Hurricane Katrina Final Report on 2005 Hurricane Season Impacts to Northwest Florida Florida Department of Environmental Protection Division of Water Resource Management Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems April 2006 Foreword The Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection is responsible for protection and management of Florida’s sandy beaches fronting the Gulf of Mexico, the Atlantic Ocean and the Straits of Florida, and the regulation of coastal development adjacent to those coastal beaches. The monitoring and assessment of hurricane impacts to Florida’s beaches and coastal construction and the preparation of post-storm recovery responses and management strategies are important elements of the Bureau’s responsibilities. This report provides documentation of the impacts of Hurricanes Dennis and Katrina on the coast of northwest Florida. The report also provides recommendations for post-storm response activities. This report was prepared by the Coastal Engineering Section for the Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems. The report was written by Ralph R. Clark, P.E., P.L.S., with major contributions and preparation of graphics by James LaGrone, Coastal Engineer. Field data of beach and dune erosion and structural damage were obtained by Ralph Clark, James LaGrone, Robert Brantly, P.E., and Junaid As-Salek, P.E. Post-storm high water surveys and beach and dune surveys were obtained by Thomas Watters, P.L.S., Ernest Besse, Guy Weeks, and James LaGrone. Aerial videography and oblique aerial photography were provided by Stacey B. Roberts of PBS&J and Camera Copters, Inc. STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION _________________________________ Michael R. -
A Comparative Analysis of Hurricane Dennis and Other Recent Hurricanes on the Coastal Communities of Northwest Florida
A Comparative Analysis of Hurricane Dennis and Other Recent Hurricanes on the Coastal Communities of Northwest Florida by – Ralph R. Clark1 and James LaGrone1 Abstract Northwest Florida has been directly impacted by nine hurricanes and sustained major fringe impacts from three other major hurricanes between 1972 and 2005, or roughly one hurricane every three years (Figure 1). The Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and predecessor agencies have monitored and assessed the impact of most of these hurricanes on northwest Florida’s beaches and coastal construction during the past three decades. Much of the information on these hurricanes has been published in Bureau reports of post-storm beach conditions and coastal impact with recommendations for recovery. Post-storm reports are available for at least eight of these hurricanes. As this data base of storm damages continues to grow, comparisons can be made for different northwest Florida beach communities. There are both similarities and differences in each storm’s impact on a coastal community from which we may learn and plan for the future. Figure 1. Northwest Florida hurricane tracks (1972-2005). 1 Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems, 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Introduction Hurricane Dennis, the first hurricane of the 2005 hurricane season for the Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean Sea, and Gulf of Mexico, made landfall June 10th, on Santa Rosa Island, Florida, between the beach communities of Pensacola Beach and Navarre Beach. Dennis made landfall as a category three hurricane on the Saffir-Simpson hurricane intensity scale with winds of 115 to 120 mph. -
Santa Rosa County Local Mitigation Strategy SECTION 3 HAZARD
Santa Rosa County Local Mitigation Strategy SECTION 3 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT 3.1 Santa Rosa County Local Mitigation Strategy This page intentionally left blank. 3.2 Santa Rosa County Local Mitigation Strategy HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT Introduction This section of the Santa Rosa County LMS summarizes the results of a hazards and vulnerability assessment process undertaken by the Task Force members and includes a description of the types of hazards that may affect Santa Rosa County, their probability of occurrence, the geographic locations that are vulnerable, the number of structures and population affected, and potential loss estimates. This information, gathered from a variety of sources, provides the best available data for describing and quantifying the potential impacts to Santa Rosa County and is consistent with the County’s Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. Primary attention is given to natural hazards considered reasonably possible to occur in the County as identified thorough research by staff, input from members and citizens, and data provided by FEMA and other sources. These hazards include: Flooding (Hurricanes, Tropical Storms, and Thunderstorms) Severe Storms and Lightning (Including Hurricane Winds) Tornadoes and Waterspouts Wildfire Heat Waves and Drought Winter Storms and Freezes Erosion Tsunamis/Rogue Waves This update of the LMS omits hazards noted in prior versions that are unlikely to occur in Santa Rosa County. Those hazards are earthquake, avalanche, land subsidence, landslide, volcano, and sinkholes. The previous LMS also identified dam/levee failure as a separate hazard; however, the dams in Santa Rosa County are fairly small in size and impacts from failures fall within the broader hazard category of flooding. -
Community Redevelopment Plan 2018
City of Gulf Breeze COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 2018 1 A. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 4 2. Economic Environment .................................................................................................. 24 1. City of Gulf Breeze Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) ................................ 4 3. Regulatory Environment ................................................................................................ 24 a. Conditions Determining the Need for Redevelopment ....................................... 5 H. STRATEGIES AND RECOMMENDATION ................................................................. 25 b. Comprehensive Plan Objectives for Redevelopment ........................................... 5 1. Strategies for Addressing Blight Conditions -1990 ................................................. 25 2. Purpose of the 2018 Community Redevelopment Plan Update ............................... 5 2. Community Redevelopment Objectives ..................................................................... 25 B. COMMUNITY VISION.......................................................................................................... 7 3. Strategies and Recommendations for Addressing Blight Conditions .................. 25 1. “Most Livable City Plan” ................................................................................................. 7 4. Local Funding Sources .................................................................................................. -
Pensacola Bay System Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan
Pensacola Bay System Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan November 2017 Program Development Series 17-06 Northwest Florida Water Management District Pensacola Bay System Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan November 2017 Program Development Series 17-06 NORTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT GOVERNING BOARD George Roberts Jerry Pate John Alter Chair, Panama City Vice Chair, Pensacola Secretary-Treasurer, Malone Gus Andrews Jon Costello Marc Dunbar DeFuniak Springs Tallahassee Tallahassee Ted Everett Nick Patronis Bo Spring Chipley Panama City Beach Port St. Joe Brett J. Cyphers Executive Director Headquarters 81 Water Management Drive Havana, Florida 32333-4712 (850) 539-5999 www.nwfwater.com Crestview Econfina Milton 180 E. Redstone Avenue 6418 E. Highway 20 5453 Davisson Road Crestview, Florida 32539 Youngstown, FL 32466 Milton, FL 32583 (850) 683-5044 (850) 722-9919 (850) 626-3101 Pensacola Bay System SWIM Plan Northwest Florida Water Management District Acknowledgements This document was developed by the Northwest Florida Water Management District under the auspices of the Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) Program and in accordance with sections 373.451-459, Florida Statutes. The plan update was prepared under the supervision and oversight of Brett Cyphers, Executive Director, and Carlos Herd, Director, Division of Resource Management. Funding support was provided by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation’s Gulf Environmental Benefit Fund. The assistance and support of the NFWF is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would like to especially recognize members of the public, as well as agency reviewers and staff from the District and from the Ecology and Environment, Inc., team that contributed to the development of this plan. -
Download Download
.Iournal of Coastal Research 4[)7 4HI Fort Lauderdale, Florida Spring 1992 I Inlet Migration and Hydraulic Processes at East Pass, Florida Andrew Morang Coastal Engineering Research Center U.S,Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station Vicksburg, MS ;~9180-6199. U.S.A. ABSTRA{=T _ MOHAN(;, A., 1992. Inlet Migrat ion and Hydraulic Processes at East Pass, Florida. Journal (if Coast.al ,ttlllllll:. Research, Hen, ·1;)7 481. Fort Lauderdale (Florida), ISSN 0719-0208. East Pass, a tidal inlet in the Florida Panhandle between Pensacola and Panama City, connects Choc •• • tawhatchee Bay to the Gulf of Mexico. From 198;{ t.o 1991, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers sponsored ~ ~ a monitoring project to measure waVCH, currents. tidal elevations, bathymetry, and shoreline changes at ass'#" the site. Based on these data and on historical records, a three-phase model has heen developed which --+4 describes the inlet's behavior during the last. 120 years. The first phase (pre-1928) is of spit development 1+-- and breaching and covers the period when the pass was oriented in a northwest-southeast direction between Choctawhatchee Bay and the Gulf. From 1928 to 1968, the inlet was characterized by the second phase: stable throat position but with a main ebb channel that migrated over a developing ebb-tidal delta. This phase covers the time after the inlet breached through Santa Rosa Island in a north-south direction and began to migrate to the east. The third phase, spanning 1968, when rubble-mound jetties were built, to the present is characterized by a stable throat and ebb channel, and ebb-tidal shoal growth. -
Seagrass Abundance and Productivity in Pensacola Bay and Santa Rosa
Seagrass abundance and productivity in Pensacola Bay and Santa Rosa Sound Final Technical Report Submitted to Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute Photo credit: B. Albrecht Jane M. Caffrey, Barbara Albrecht, Rachel Capps Center for Environmental Diagnostics and Bioremediation University of West Florida January 31, 2017 Deliverable 1 - Historical Perspective A variety of information related to seagrasses in Pensacola Bay and Santa Rosa Sound has been collated. This includes available seagrass data, publications, maps and imagery and was included in the Progress report and Appendix 1. The results from the workshop conducted on January 29- 30 were reported in the Progress report and are included in Appendix 2. The Pensacola Bay System (PBS) is located in the extreme western panhandle of Florida. The PBS covers 372 km2 and receives drainage from 18,130 km2 in northwest Florida and southern Alabama. The PBS encompasses the Escambia, Blackwater, East, and Pensacola Bays. It is a drowned river valley with a small outlet into the Gulf of Mexico at the western end of Santa Rosa Island. A 1948 survey of the PBS reported extensive seagrass beds, followed by reports of seagrass die off beginning in 1955 with the most rapid loss in Escambia Bay near industry.Historically, the PBS has had problems with anthropogenic inputs, both point and non- point source, discharging into its waters (Olinger 1975). Large areas of submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) and oyster reefs were lost in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s. After the implementation of regulatory standards in the 1970’s, the condition of the system improved.