<<

Méthodes de simulation et modélisation

Caroline Mellot-Draznieks [email protected]

avec la participation de Frédérik Tielens 2

Chemistry Software Hardware Quantum Chemical Packages ? QM/MM, MM approaches, Coarse grain…

Computational Chemistry

Complements to experiments Properties • Predictions of never observed phenomena! of and solids • • Design of new molecules and materials

• Nobel Prize Chemistry 1998 Choose the • Nobel Prize Chemistry 2013 Several appropriate Approaches approaches

3 Introduction

• Computational Chemistry?

• Each system its approach!

• Different groups of software   Computational Chemistry

QM/MM

DFT – physics, astrophysics, biochemistry, material sciences… Computational Chemistry

QM/MM

DFT – Gaussian physics, astrophysics, biochemistry, material sciences… Which system for which method/software?

• Is there a particular category of computations that is of most interest? – Structure: • Geometry optimizations based on model chemistry • Comparison of computational results to experimental results • Transition state geometries – Property: • Electrical, optical, magnetic, etc • Determination of spectra, from NMR to X-Ray • Calculation of quantum descriptors – Quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) – (Re)activity: • Reaction mechanisms in chemistry and biochemistry • QSAR-types of problems – Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) is the process by which chemical structure is quantitatively correlated with a well defined process 7 Each System its approach …

Approaches involve different approximations: • Simplified forms = easier or faster to solve • Approximations by limiting the size of the system

For example, most ab initio calculations make the Born- Oppenheimer approximation, which greatly simplifies the underlying Schrödinger Equation by freezing the nuclei in place during the calculation.

Ab Initio Methods Exact solution In practice impossible The goal of computational chemistry is to minimize this residual error while keeping the calculations tractable. 8 Which system for which method/software?

• Systems • Methods • Atoms & molecules •MM • Clusters • Parameters Exp./QC • Molecular complexes •HF/Post-HF • Large molecular systems • MPn/CC/CI • Biomolecules • Localized basis functions • Solvated systems • Slater/Gaussian •Biological membranes • Pseudo-potentials • External Perturbations • DFT • Electric/magnetic Fields • Functionals • Solids • Pure DFT/Hybrid • Bulk/Surfaces • Local Basis/Plane waves • Crystals/Amorphous • Pseudopotentials • Metals/oxides • Cluster/Periodic 9 Methodologies

No mathematical solution Several Too computationally demanding Approaches Specificity of the system Calculation Complexity

Semi Exact Post HF HF DFT Empir. MM Only for Only for Finite and Large & complex H-atom relatively Periodic, systems small etc. systems System Complexity Price to pay … Accuracy!10 11 Limits of Computational Chemistry

Exact

l Post-HF e v e

L DFT

on HF ati l u

Semi-Empiricalc l a

C MM Atomistic Methods

Atoms Poly atomic molecules Solids Solids + Solvents

Diatomic Molecules Metallic Clusters Amorphous Solids13 # Atoms IntermolecularInteraction between Interactions atoms and molecules

« Chemical » Forces short range (1-2 Å) 200-800 kJ/mol 1. E covalent share of electrons

« Physical » Forces

2. E electrostatic charge - charge long range (10 Å) charge - dipole NaCl, LiF, Rbi… dipole - dipole 600-1000 kJ/mol charge - non polar atom

3. E repulsion short range

4. E dispersion dipole inst / dipole inst short to long range Ar liquid: U ~ 8 kJ/mol

Short range 5. E hydrogen bond 10-40 kJ/mol IntermolecularInteraction between Interactions atoms and molecules

Dipole moment

  qi r i    q 1 2 2  .E 1 2 Vdipdip (r)  3 1(  3cos  ) ind Viondip (r)   cos 2 40r 40r

Dipoles in motion (Temp.) 2 2 2 C C  1 2 V (r)   2 2 dipdip 6 4(3 0 ) kBT r 1 '2 Vdipdip.ind (r)   6 0r

• Model based on classical mechanics (not quantum)

• Molecules are treated like an ensemble of atoms in space linked to each other with bonds described by functions of elastic potentials

 Very big systems  F=-kx Results not always reliable 16 Forcefield Methods: Forcefield methods

They are based on a simple description of the potential energy between atoms using empirical equations

Total potential energy:

N E(r ) = Ebond + Eangles + Edihedral + E van der Waals + E electrostatic + E polarisation

Bonded interactions Non bonded interactions INTRA-molecular only INTER-molecular only

FORCEFIELD = a parametrized function of E   Eij   Eijk   Eijkl the potential energy ij ijk ijkl

F Q* 1 k (r -r* )2 + 1 k (Q -Q* )2 + k (1 cosnF ) ie ij ij ij ijk ijk ijk ijkl ± ijkl E covalent 2 2 liaison angle torsion e r*

qi qj qi qj ie E électrost 4o rij .

ie Potentiel de Lennard-Jones E répuls°- 12 6 disp ° r*ij r*ij Eij = ij -2 rij rij r*ij Potentiel de Buckingham ij 6 Eij = Aij exp (-rij/ij) - Bij/rij Explore the Potential Energy Surfaces

Initial Crystal Structure + ForceField

Unit cell kij r*ij kijk Q*ijk kijkl Fijkl symmetry qi qj ij Atomic coordinates kcore-shell qcore qshell

SIMULATIONS

=

Exploration of the HYPERSURFACE OF ENERGY

Explore the Potential Energy Surfaces

The minima of the total potential energy corresponds to - conformers of a single organic

- polymorphs of a solid (SiO2, TiO2) - adsorption sites on a surface

The PES possesses many minima and there is no general mathematical approach to find the global minimum. One uses numerical approaches that allow to find local minima.

There are different strategies to explore the PES, depending on the kind of information wanted.

STATISTICAL METHODS

ENERGY MINIMISATION DYNAMICS MONTE CARLO Molecular Mechanics

• Ball and spring description of molecules • Able to compute relative strain energies • Cheap to compute • Lots of empirical parameters that have to be carefully tested and calibrated • equilibrium geometries • No electronic interactions into account No information on reactivity Cannot readily handle reactions involving the making and breaking of bonds

ReaxFF(William A Goddard III) for hydrocarbons reactions, transition metals catalysed nanotube formation, zeolites, silica surfaces, benchmarking DFT. Molecular Mechanics

•AMBER •CHARMM

•VMD - Visual •MOLDY - Free MD program •GROMACS Molecular Dynamics on Parallel Computers •GROMOS Dynamic Modelling of Molecular Systems •MacroModel - Molecular Modelling •MSI/Biosym Molecular Modelling Software •NAMD - Scalable Molecular Dynamics •TINKER package for molecular mechanics and dynamics •SYBYL - software from Tripos •X-PLOR- MM program free for Academics •DNAtools-Web tools to analyze DNA

22 Molecular Mechanics

23 Molecular Mechanics

24 Molecular Mechanics

25 26 Molecular Dynamics

Principle of Molecular Dynamics Molecular Dynamics/ Energy Minimisation

• Move atoms in the direction of the force • Minimisation: one conformation: which is acting on this atom: problem of local minimum

• Dynamics: Trajectory with time calculations of averages comparison with macroscopic measurements

• The force F is derived from the potential • Dynamics can pass energy barriers energy, which is evaluted using the empirical forcefield or ab initio

• Sampling of configurations

• Simulation of time-dependant events Molecular Dynamics

T Eie Equation de Newton:

F = m . a = m . dv/dt = m . d2x/dt2

a = dv/dt a = -1/m dE/dr

equations de Newton v = at + v X ( t ) ( t + t ) o i X i D v i ( t ) v i ( t + Dt ) v = dx/dt

• Long x = v.t + x • Rich in informations on o dynamics and structures 2 • Cross energy barriers x = a.t + vo.t + xo

Activation energies Diffusion coefficients Trajectories Simulations Based on Statistics

• Molecular Dynamics  *Grands systèmes *Effet solvant Equations of movement (Newton) *Propriétés macroscopique (capacité calorifique, const. dielectr., diffusion) • Monte Carlo  *Souvent parametrisé Different configurations of a system are *Sinon long temps de calculs generated ad random, and a selected is *Propriétés électroniques made on the basis of the Boltzmann distribution

Start conditions known: Atom Positions Conditions Conditions Forces … after Dt1 after Dtn Masses Temperature Etc.

Properties are calculated as mean values after a certain time (when equilibrium is reached) 29 Statistical ensembles

• Microcanonical ensemble (NVE):The thermodynamic state characte- rized by a fixed number of atoms, N, a fixed volume, V, and a fixed energy, E. This corresponds to an isolated system.

•Canonical Ensemble (NVT): it is a collection of all systems whose thermodynamic state is characterized by a fixed number of atoms, N, a fixed volume, V, and a fixed temperature, T.

•Isobaric‐Isothermal Ensemble (NPT):This ensemble is characterized by a fixed number of atoms, N, a fixed pressure, P, and a fixed temperature, T.

•Grand canonical Ensemble(μVT):The thermodynamic state for this e ensemble is characterized by a fixed chemical potential, μ, a fixed volume, V, and a fixed temperature, T.

Monte Carlo Methods

Metropolis algorithm

T (N,V,T):

1. Calculate the energy E(i) of the initial configuration of the N atomes 2. Random move of atoms (translation and rotation), with new energy E (i+1) Rich in information E < 0 p acc = 1 D (i, i+1)

DE(i, i+1) > 0 p acc  exp (- DE(i, i+1) /kT) Adsorption Heats (N,V,T) Isotherms (,V,T)

Density of states 3. Statistical average: Radiale distribution functions

NB: importance choice of the move parameters , acceptance/rejectance ratio of 50% for a good sampling Simulated Annealing

Decrease the temperature T

T

T

Identifies various local minima Adsorption of cyclohexane in zeolite HY

NEUTRON DIFFRACTION «@ low température (5 K)

2.74 Å

Rietveld Refinement

Location of adsorbed molecules 50 % of cyclohexane located In nanoporous frameworks In 12-ring windows Adsorption of cyclohexane in zeolite HY

ENERGY MINIMISATION (zéro K)

Monte Carlo : Random generation of 50 % 3 Å 20 initial configurations of cyclohexane

50 % Energy Minimisation de of each of the 20 configurations 2.9 Å

2.8 Å 2.8 Å

2.8 Å 2.8 Å

Vitale, Mellot and Cheetham, J. Phys. Chem. 1997, 101, 9886. CH3OH distribution through pair distribution functions Dominant Na+(II) - Om Hydrogen bond between methanol interactions molecules

16 methanol

32 methanol Liquid 48 methanol 96 methanol

Intensity (a.u.) Intensity (a.u.)

1,2 1,6 2,0 2,4 2,8 3,2 3,6 4,0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Distance (Å) Distance (Å)

• 1926 Schrödinger: finds the solution for the hydrogen atom using quantum mechanics

No solution nor operational HY = EY method, nor computation power for multi-electronic  systems

• Hartree-Fock Approach 1930 … 1960 (Each e- is described in the field of the other e-, No electron correlation, SCF method)

Poly-electronic Unpaired electrons & systems! correlation of electron   movements

Looking for new methods for the calculation of systems in

which electron correlation is important. 36 Quantum Chemistry

37 Post-HF methods

38 Post-HF methods

39 Density Functional Theory

40 The VASP approach

Periodic models + DFT + plane waves + pseudopotentials

All electrons meta-GGA, hybrid Pseudopotentials GGA LDA

Atomic orbital periodic Plane waves not periodic Numeric Density FunctionalDensity Functional Theory Theory

42 Self-consistent calculation procedure

43 44 Exchange-correlation functional

45 Accuracy of DFT

46 Accuracy of DFT

47 Accuracy of DFT

48 Limitations of DFT

49 Limitations of DFT

50 Strategies

Type of interactions in the system matters … but also the Size!

Methods Calculation Strategies

51 Calculation Strategies

– Finite Size vs. Periodic – Simulations based on statistics – Approaches for systems with a large number of atoms

Tools – Calculation of electronic properties – Calculation of macroscopic properties

52 Finite vs. Periodic?

• Periodic –  – No edge effects – Larger models – Plane wave basis set – IR and Raman frequencies – Specific calculations: TSs, crossing points –  PBE/plane waves – Pure DFT VASP 4.6 program – Heavy calcs for Hybrid methods • Finite Size & localized basis sets –  – Hybrid methods: B3LYP – Localized basis sets – IR and Raman intensities – Specific calculations: TSs, crossing points

–  – Smaller model B3LYP 6-311G(2d,p) – Edge effects 53 Gaussian03 program – No coverage effect 54 55 56 Approximations for Systems with a Large Number of Atoms

• QM/MM & ONIOM  *Large systems • Ex. Bio Systems (, , etc.) *Very versatile • Ex. Zeolites  *long calculation times Level 1: *difficult description border Ab Initio zones between levels *MM Potential not always Level 2: available Semi-Empirical/MM Level 3: MM/charges

57 « The DFT » from the physicists used by chemists

• DFT not Computational but Conceptual The mathematical framework of DFT permits de precise definition of chemistry concepts (link to reactivity) – Electronegativity – Hardness and Softness – Chemical Potential – Variations of the electron density (Fukui) Chemical Reactivity Theory 58 Molecular Modeling Software

• Molecular Mechanics • Quantum Chemistry • Molecular visualization and editing • Other …

Companies – Academics Freeware – Web Applications

59 Quantum Chemistry Molecular visualization and editing

Molecules Periodic Systems

Crystal Maker •GaussView VMD •ECCE ModelView •Arguslab MOLDRAW (Molecules and crystals) •VMD (Molecules and crystals) •VegaZZ •DeepView • •MolView and Molview Lite - Macintosh

Selection!