Software and Techniques for Bio-Molecular Modelling
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
MODELLER 10.1 Manual
MODELLER A Program for Protein Structure Modeling Release 10.1, r12156 Andrej Saliˇ with help from Ben Webb, M.S. Madhusudhan, Min-Yi Shen, Guangqiang Dong, Marc A. Martı-Renom, Narayanan Eswar, Frank Alber, Maya Topf, Baldomero Oliva, Andr´as Fiser, Roberto S´anchez, Bozidar Yerkovich, Azat Badretdinov, Francisco Melo, John P. Overington, and Eric Feyfant email: modeller-care AT salilab.org URL https://salilab.org/modeller/ 2021/03/12 ii Contents Copyright notice xxi Acknowledgments xxv 1 Introduction 1 1.1 What is Modeller?............................................. 1 1.2 Modeller bibliography....................................... .... 2 1.3 Obtainingandinstallingtheprogram. .................... 3 1.4 Bugreports...................................... ............ 4 1.5 Method for comparative protein structure modeling by Modeller ................... 5 1.6 Using Modeller forcomparativemodeling. ... 8 1.6.1 Preparinginputfiles . ............. 8 1.6.2 Running Modeller ......................................... 9 2 Automated comparative modeling with AutoModel 11 2.1 Simpleusage ..................................... ............ 11 2.2 Moreadvancedusage............................... .............. 12 2.2.1 Including water molecules, HETATM residues, and hydrogenatoms .............. 12 2.2.2 Changing the default optimization and refinement protocol ................... 14 2.2.3 Getting a very fast and approximate model . ................. 14 2.2.4 Building a model from multiple templates . .................. 15 2.2.5 Buildinganallhydrogenmodel -
Latest Stable Copy and Install It With: Chmod+X Chimera- *.Bin&&./Chimera- *.Bin
Tangram Suite Documentation Release 0.0.8 InsiliChem Mar 26, 2019 General instructions 1 What is Tangram Suite 3 2 How to install Tangram Suite5 3 General usage 7 4 FAQ & Known issues 9 5 List of Tans 11 6 Tangram BondOrder 13 7 Tangram QMSetup 15 8 Tangram DummyAtoms 17 9 Tangram GAUDIView 19 10 Tangram MMSetup 21 11 Tangram NCIPlot 23 12 Tangram NormalModes 25 13 Tangram OrbiTraj 27 14 Tangram PLIP 29 15 Tangram PoPMuSiCGUI 31 16 Tangram PropKaGUI 33 17 Tangram ReVina 35 18 Tangram SubAlign 37 19 Tangram TalaDraw 39 i ii Tangram Suite Documentation, Release 0.0.8 It’s composed of several independent graphical interfaces and commands for UCSF Chimera. General instructions 1 Tangram Suite Documentation, Release 0.0.8 2 General instructions CHAPTER 1 What is Tangram Suite In progress 3 Tangram Suite Documentation, Release 0.0.8 4 Chapter 1. What is Tangram Suite CHAPTER 2 How to install Tangram Suite 2.1 Install the full Tangram Suite (recommended) 1 - If you don’t have UCSF Chimera installed, download the latest stable copy and install it with: chmod+x chimera- *.bin&&./chimera- *.bin 2 - Download the latest installer from the releases page (Linux and MacOS only) and run it with: bash tangram-*.sh 2.2 Using the conda meta-package Instead of using the Bash installer, you can use conda (if you are already using it) to create a new environment with the tangram metapackage, which will handle all the dependencies. While in alpha, both insilichem channels are needed (the main one and also the dev label): conda create-n tangram-c insilichem/label/dev-c insilichem-c omnia-c rdkit-c ,!conda-forge tangram 2.3 Updating extensions Each extension will check if there’s a new release available every time you launch it. -
MODELLER 10.0 Manual
MODELLER A Program for Protein Structure Modeling Release 10.0, r12005 Andrej Saliˇ with help from Ben Webb, M.S. Madhusudhan, Min-Yi Shen, Guangqiang Dong, Marc A. Martı-Renom, Narayanan Eswar, Frank Alber, Maya Topf, Baldomero Oliva, Andr´as Fiser, Roberto S´anchez, Bozidar Yerkovich, Azat Badretdinov, Francisco Melo, John P. Overington, and Eric Feyfant email: modeller-care AT salilab.org URL https://salilab.org/modeller/ 2021/01/25 ii Contents Copyright notice xxi Acknowledgments xxv 1 Introduction 1 1.1 What is Modeller?............................................. 1 1.2 Modeller bibliography....................................... .... 2 1.3 Obtainingandinstallingtheprogram. .................... 3 1.4 Bugreports...................................... ............ 4 1.5 Method for comparative protein structure modeling by Modeller ................... 5 1.6 Using Modeller forcomparativemodeling. ... 8 1.6.1 Preparinginputfiles . ............. 8 1.6.2 Running Modeller ......................................... 9 2 Automated comparative modeling with AutoModel 11 2.1 Simpleusage ..................................... ............ 11 2.2 Moreadvancedusage............................... .............. 12 2.2.1 Including water molecules, HETATM residues, and hydrogenatoms .............. 12 2.2.2 Changing the default optimization and refinement protocol ................... 14 2.2.3 Getting a very fast and approximate model . ................. 14 2.2.4 Building a model from multiple templates . .................. 15 2.2.5 Buildinganallhydrogenmodel -
GROMACS: Fast, Flexible, and Free
GROMACS: Fast, Flexible, and Free DAVID VAN DER SPOEL,1 ERIK LINDAHL,2 BERK HESS,3 GERRIT GROENHOF,4 ALAN E. MARK,4 HERMAN J. C. BERENDSEN4 1Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, Box 596, S-75124 Uppsala, Sweden 2Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, SCFAB, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden 3Max-Planck Institut fu¨r Polymerforschung, Ackermannweg 10, D-55128 Mainz, Germany 4Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, NL-9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands Received 12 February 2005; Accepted 18 March 2005 DOI 10.1002/jcc.20291 Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). Abstract: This article describes the software suite GROMACS (Groningen MAchine for Chemical Simulation) that was developed at the University of Groningen, The Netherlands, in the early 1990s. The software, written in ANSI C, originates from a parallel hardware project, and is well suited for parallelization on processor clusters. By careful optimization of neighbor searching and of inner loop performance, GROMACS is a very fast program for molecular dynamics simulation. It does not have a force field of its own, but is compatible with GROMOS, OPLS, AMBER, and ENCAD force fields. In addition, it can handle polarizable shell models and flexible constraints. The program is versatile, as force routines can be added by the user, tabulated functions can be specified, and analyses can be easily customized. Nonequilibrium dynamics and free energy determinations are incorporated. Interfaces with popular quantum-chemical packages (MOPAC, GAMES-UK, GAUSSIAN) are provided to perform mixed MM/QM simula- tions. The package includes about 100 utility and analysis programs. -
Secondary Structure Propensities in Peptide Folding Simulations: a Systematic Comparison of Molecular Mechanics Interaction Schemes
Biophysical Journal Volume 97 July 2009 599–608 599 Secondary Structure Propensities in Peptide Folding Simulations: A Systematic Comparison of Molecular Mechanics Interaction Schemes Dirk Matthes and Bert L. de Groot* Department of Theoretical and Computational Biophysics, Computational Biomolecular Dynamics Group, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Go¨ttingen, Germany ABSTRACT We present a systematic study directed toward the secondary structure propensity and sampling behavior in peptide folding simulations with eight different molecular dynamics force-field variants in explicit solvent. We report on the combi- national result of force field, water model, and electrostatic interaction schemes and compare to available experimental charac- terization of five studied model peptides in terms of reproduced structure and dynamics. The total simulation time exceeded 18 ms and included simulations that started from both folded and extended conformations. Despite remaining sampling issues, a number of distinct trends in the folding behavior of the peptides emerged. Pronounced differences in the propensity of finding prominent secondary structure motifs in the different applied force fields suggest that problems point in particular to the balance of the relative stabilities of helical and extended conformations. INTRODUCTION Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are routinely utilized to that study, simulations of relatively short lengths were per- study the folding dynamics of peptides and small proteins as formed and the natively folded state was used as starting well as biomolecular aggregation. The critical constituents of point, possibly biasing the results (13). such molecular mechanics studies are the validity of the under- For folding simulations, such a systematic test has not lyingphysical models together with theassumptionsofclassical been carried out so far, although with growing computer dynamics and a sufficient sampling of the conformational power several approaches toward the in silico folding space. -
JRC QSAR Model Database
JRC QSAR Model Database EURL ECVAM DataBase service on ALternative Methods to animal experimentation To promote the development and uptake of alternative and advanced methods in toxicology and biomedical sciences SDF - STRUCTURE DATA FORMAT: How to create from SMILES The European Commission’s science and knowledge service Joint Research Centre Directorate F Health, Consumers & Reference Materials Chemicals Safety & Alternative Methods Unit The European Commission’s science and knowledge service Joint Research Centre EUR 28708 EN This publication is a Tutorial by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide user support. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. Contact information Email: [email protected] JRC Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRC107492 EUR 28708 EN PDF ISBN 978-92-79-71294-4 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2760/952280 Print ISBN 978-92-79-71295-1 ISSN 1018-5593 doi:10.2760/668595 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017 Ispra: European Commission, 2017 © European Union, 2017 The reuse of the document is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the original meaning or message of the texts are not distorted. The European Commission shall not be held liable for any consequences stemming from the reuse. How to cite this document: Triebe -
Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Drug Discovery and Pharmaceutical Development
processes Review Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Drug Discovery and Pharmaceutical Development Outi M. H. Salo-Ahen 1,2,* , Ida Alanko 1,2, Rajendra Bhadane 1,2 , Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin 3,* , Rodrigo Vargas Honorato 3, Shakhawath Hossain 4 , André H. Juffer 5 , Aleksei Kabedev 4, Maija Lahtela-Kakkonen 6, Anders Støttrup Larsen 7, Eveline Lescrinier 8 , Parthiban Marimuthu 1,2 , Muhammad Usman Mirza 8 , Ghulam Mustafa 9, Ariane Nunes-Alves 10,11,* , Tatu Pantsar 6,12, Atefeh Saadabadi 1,2 , Kalaimathy Singaravelu 13 and Michiel Vanmeert 8 1 Pharmaceutical Sciences Laboratory (Pharmacy), Åbo Akademi University, Tykistökatu 6 A, Biocity, FI-20520 Turku, Finland; ida.alanko@abo.fi (I.A.); rajendra.bhadane@abo.fi (R.B.); parthiban.marimuthu@abo.fi (P.M.); atefeh.saadabadi@abo.fi (A.S.) 2 Structural Bioinformatics Laboratory (Biochemistry), Åbo Akademi University, Tykistökatu 6 A, Biocity, FI-20520 Turku, Finland 3 Faculty of Science-Chemistry, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands; [email protected] 4 Swedish Drug Delivery Forum (SDDF), Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala Biomedical Center, Uppsala University, 751 23 Uppsala, Sweden; [email protected] (S.H.); [email protected] (A.K.) 5 Biocenter Oulu & Faculty of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Oulu, Aapistie 7 A, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland; andre.juffer@oulu.fi 6 School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, FI-70210 Kuopio, Finland; maija.lahtela-kakkonen@uef.fi (M.L.-K.); tatu.pantsar@uef.fi -
Quantitative Evaluation of Dissociation Mechanisms in Phenolphthalein and the Related Compounds
J. Comput. Chem. Jpn., Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 13–21 (2016) ©2016 Society of Computer Chemistry, Japan Technical Paper Quantitative Evaluation of Dissociation Mechanisms in Phenolphthalein and the Related Compounds Toshihiko HANAI Health Research Foundation, Research Institute for Production Development 4F, 15 Shimogamo-morimoto-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-0805, Japan e-mail: [email protected] (Received: October 11, 2015; Accepted for publication: April 14, 2016; Online publication: May 6, 2016) Computational chemistry programs were evaluated as aids to teaching qualitative analytical chemistry. Compu- tational chemical calculations can predict absorption spectra, thus enabling the modeling of indicator dissociation mechanisms by different computational chemical programs using a personal computer. An updated MNDO program among 51 programs was found to be the best predictor to explain the dissociation mechanisms of isobenzofuranones and sulfonephthaleins. Unknown dissociation constants were predicted from atomic partial charges instead of Ham- mett's constants. Keywords: Quantitative analysis of dissociation mechanisms, Isobenzofuranone, Sulfonephthalein, Computational chemistry 1 Introduction the absorption wavelength and electron density changes were not well described. The dissociation mechanisms, maximum How to quantitatively teach qualitative analytical chemistry is wavelengths, and electron density maps of isobenzofuranones a very important subject for analytical chemists. Previously, a and sulfonephthaleins were, therefore, evaluated by in silico method to teach molecular interaction mechanisms in chroma- analysis despite the anticipated poor precision. The experimen- tography was quantitatively achieved using molecular mechan- tally measured dissociation of phenolphthalein is described ics and MOPAC programs [1]. Furthermore, the reaction mech- using four dissociation structures, where the ionization of two anisms of highly sensitive detections were also quantitatively phenolic hydroxyl groups converts the neutral molecular form described [2,3]. -
Molecular Docking Studies of a Cyclic Octapeptide-Cyclosaplin from Sandalwood
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 11 June 2019 doi:10.20944/preprints201906.0091.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Biomolecules 2019, 9; doi:10.3390/biom9040123 Molecular Docking Studies of a Cyclic Octapeptide-Cyclosaplin from Sandalwood Abheepsa Mishra1, 2,* and Satyahari Dey1 1Plant Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur-721302, West Bengal, India; [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (S.D.) 2Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, USA *Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.:+1(518) 881-9196 Abstract Natural products from plants such as, chemopreventive agents attract huge attention because of their low toxicity and high specificity. The rational drug design in combination with structure based modeling and rapid screening methods offer significant potential for identifying and developing lead anticancer molecules. Thus, the molecular docking method plays an important role in screening a large set of molecules based on their free binding energies and proposes structural hypotheses of how the molecules can inhibit the target. Several peptide based therapeutics have been developed to combat several health disorders including cancers, metabolic disorders, heart-related, and infectious diseases. Despite the discovery of hundreds of such therapeutic peptides however, only few peptide-based drugs have made it to the market. Moreover, until date the activities of cyclic peptides towards molecular targets such as protein kinases, proteases, and apoptosis related proteins have never been explored. In this study we explore the in silico kinase and protease inhibitor potentials of cyclosaplin as well as study the interactions of cyclosaplin with other cancer-related proteins. -
BIOVIA DISCOVERY STUDIO® 2016 COMPREHENSIVE MODELING and SIMULATIONS for LIFE SCIENCES Datasheet
BIOVIA DISCOVERY STUDIO® 2016 COMPREHENSIVE MODELING AND SIMULATIONS FOR LIFE SCIENCES Datasheet ACCURATELY Drug discovery is a multi-objective optimization. Scientists have to optimize both biochemical potency and characteristics such as ADME and toxicity. The latest PREDICT LIGAND release of BIOVIA’s predictive science application, Discovery Studio®, continues the BINDING evolution of new science in its market-leading CHARMm molecular simulations engine. Built on BIOVIA Foundation™, Discovery Studio® is uniquely positioned as ENERGIES the most comprehensive, collaborative modeling and simulation application for Life Sciences discovery research. DISCOVERY STUDIO 2016 Part of the 2016 BIOVIA product release series, Discovery Studio 2016 continues to deliver key new CHARMm-based molecular simulations. NEW AND ENHANCED SCIENCE • New! Steered Molecular Dynamics: Developed and validated in academia by members of the CHARMM Developer community2,3, the CHARMM AFM (Atomic Force Microscopy) function has been included in the latest release of Discovery Studio CHARMm • Apply a pull force to a molecular system to: • Estimate the ligand binding free energy • Study the conformational details of the ligand unbinding process • Investigate protein unfolding or conformational • Major DMol3 Performance Improvement: The latest release changes of the density functional theory program DMol3, version • Two protocols have been included to enable the simulation 2016, includes dramatic performance improvements, both in of protein or protein-ligand complexes while -
UCSF Chimera Was Developed by the Computer Graphics Laboratory at the University of California, San Francisco, Under Support of NIH Grant P41-RR01081
matrixcopy apply the transformation matrix of one model to another tcolor color using texture map colors UCSF Chimera matrixget write the current transformation matrices to a ®le texture de®ne texture maps and associated colors QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE June 2007 matrixset read and apply transformation matrices from a ®le thickness move the clipping planes in opposite directions minimize energy-minimize structures turn rotate about the X, Y, or Z axis mmaker (matchmaker) align models in sequence, then in 3D vdw* display van der Waals (VDW) surface modelcolor set color at the model level vdwde®ne* set VDW radii Commands modeldisplay* set display at the model level vdwdensity set VDW surface dot density *reverse function Äcommand available move translate along the X, Y, or Z axis version show copyright information and Chimera version movie capture image frames and assemble them into a movie viewdock start ViewDock and load docking results 2dlabels create arbitrary text labels and place them in 2D namesel name and save the current selection wait suspend command processing until motion has stopped ac enable accelerators (keyboard shortcuts) neon create a shadowed stick/tube image (not on Windows) window adjust the view to contain the speci®ed atoms addaa add an amino acid to a peptide C-terminus objdisplay* display graphical objects windowsize adjust the dimensions of the graphics window addcharge assign partial charges to atoms open* read structures and data, execute command ®les write save a molecule model as a PDB ®le addh add hydrogens pdbrun -
In Silico Screening and Molecular Docking of Bioactive Agents Towards Human Coronavirus Receptor
GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2020, 11(01), 132–140 Available online at GSC Online Press Directory GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences e-ISSN: 2581-3250, CODEN (USA): GBPSC2 Journal homepage: https://www.gsconlinepress.com/journals/gscbps (RESEARCH ARTICLE) In silico screening and molecular docking of bioactive agents towards human coronavirus receptor Pratyush Kumar *, Asnani Alpana, Chaple Dinesh and Bais Abhinav Priyadarshini J. L. College of Pharmacy, Electronic Building, Electronic Zone, MIDC, Hingna Road, Nagpur-440016, Maharashtra, India. Publication history: Received on 09 April 2020; revised on 13 April 2020; accepted on 15 April 2020 Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2020.11.1.0099 Abstract Coronavirus infection has turned into pandemic despite of efforts of efforts of countries like America, Italy, China, France etc. Currently India is also outraged by the virulent effect of coronavirus. Although World Health Organisation initially claimed to have all controls over the virus, till date infection has coasted several lives worldwide. Currently we do not have enough time for carrying out traditional approaches of drug discovery. Computer aided drug designing approaches are the best solution. The present study is completely dedicated to in silico approaches like virtual screening, molecular docking and molecular property calculation. The library of 15 bioactive molecules was built and virtual screening was carried towards the crystalline structure of human coronavirus (6nzk) which was downloaded from protein database. Pyrx virtual screening tool was used and results revealed that F14 showed best binding affinity. The best screened molecule was further allowed to dock with the target using Autodock vina software.