At the Margins of Europe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

At the Margins of Europe At the margins of Europe The externalisation of migration controls 2010-2011 Report Migreurop member organisations BELGIUM : CIRÉ Coordination et initiatives pour et avec les refugiés et étrangers / CNCD Centre national de coopération au développement / LDH Ligue des droits de l’homme / SAD Syndicat des avocats pour la démocratie SPAIN : Andalucia acoge /APDHA Asociación pro derechos humanos de Andalucía / CEAR Comisión española de ayuda al refugiado / SOS Racismo / ACSUR-Las Segovias FRANCE : ACORT Assemblée citoyenne des originaires de Turquie / Act Up-Paris / ANAFE Association nationale d’assistance aux frontières pour les étrangers / ATMF Association des travailleurs maghrébins de France / FASTI Fédération des associations de solidarité avec les travailleurs immigrés / FTCR Fédération des Tunisiens pour une citoyenneté des deux rives / GAS Groupe accueil et solidarité / GISTI Groupe d’information et de soutien des immigrés / IPAM Initiatives pour un autre monde / JRS France Jesuit Refugee Service / La Cimade/ MRAP Mouvement contre le racisme et pour l’amitié entre les peuples ITALY : ARCI Associazione ricreativa culturale italiana / ASGI Associazione studi giuridici sull’immigrazione / Melting Pot / NAGA Associazione volontaria di assistenza socio- sanitaria e per i diritti di stranieri e nomadi MALI : AME Association malienne des expulsés / ARACEM Association des refoulés d’Afrique centrale au Mali MOROCCO : ABCDS-Oujda Association Beni Znassen pour la culture, le développement et la solidarité / AFVIC Association des amis et familles des victimes de l’immigration clandestine / AMDH Association marocaine des droits humains / AMERM Association marocaine d’études et de recherches sur les migrations / GADEM Groupe antiraciste d’accompagnement et de défense des étrangers et migrants / Pateras de la vida MAURITANIA : AMDH Association mauritanienne des droits de l’homme PORTUGAL : SOLIM Solidariedade Imigrante UNITED KINGDOM : Statewatch / Barbed wire britain network LEBANON : Frontiers SWITZERLAND : Solidarité sans frontières TOGO : Attac Togo TURKEY : HCA Helsinki Citizens’ Assembly / RASP Refugee advocacy and support programm The network also includes around thirty individual members. Table of contents Introduction : When peoples rebel, the Union fortifies itself 6 Part 1 – On Turkey’s border: the last eastern wall 11 I. Between Iran and Turkey: a high mountain border 12 Random controls 12 The ordeal of crossing 13 An area marked by a significant number of irregular entries 13 Extreme climatic conditions 14 Militarisation of the region 14 Inhumane treatment 16 Hunting foreigners 17 The legal procedure 17 Turkish authorities’ practices on the Iranian border 17 II. Van, the net 20 "Satellite city", jail-city 21 An endless internment 21 Refugee strategies 21 An NGO support network under construction 22 A dehumanising asylum system 22 The UNHCR local branch 22 The foreigners’ police 24 Multiple forms of oppression: painful survival in a camp-city 25 Harassment and exploitation of women 25 The paradoxes of the right to asylum 26 Psychological distress and depression 26 At the service of the EU: exclusion and organisation of returns 27 The future "reception" centre 27 The future detention camp 28 Part 2 – "Stowaways" in harbours and at sea 29 Glossary and acronysm 32 III. " Grains of sand " in sea freight 33 Travelling on board of merchant navy ships 33 Humans in the midst of merchandise 33 Invisibility of "stowaways" in ports 34 Some authentic migration odysseys 36 The extreme vulnerability of "stowaways" 39 Human tragedies 39 Pact of silence concerning asylum requests 41 The presence of unaccompanied minors among the "stowaways" 44 IV. Financial stakes and security measures 46 People caught up in huge financial stakes 46 The penalties incurred by "stowaways" 46 The risk of fines and economic losses for carriers 47 Securing port areas to the hilt 49 The securitarian drift introduced by the ISPS code 50 Perimeters and control of entry points 51 Reinforcing controls around ships arriving from "risk" ports 53 V. The detention of maritime "stowaways" 58 Onboard, during the journey 58 Interviewing people after they are found 58 Confinement in a cabin 61 Additional work for seamen 62 In the ports, places of detention 64 Confinement on board of a ship 64 Surveillance by seamen and resorting to private security companies 66 Other detention spaces: waiting areas and informal facilities 67 "Stowaways" who have scant information about their rights 69 Random availability of interpreting 69 The weakness of jurisdictional control on detention 70 Requesting protection: a difficult right to exercise 71 VI. Towards a privatisation of returns 75 The growing role of insurance companies in the management of "stowaways" 75 A variety of public and private actors 75 The key role played by P&I clubs 79 Objective: getting rid of them at any cost 83 Repatriation by flight : acting quickly without regard for rights 84 Arrest upon return 87 Repatriation by boat 88 "Assisted" escapes in ports 91 Appendix 93 "country sheets" Migratory situation in merchent harbours 94 Germany (Hamburg) 94 Bulgaria (Varna and Burgas) 95 Cyprus-EU(Limassol) 96 Spain 97 France 98 Italy (Genoa and Naples) 99 The Netherlands (Rotterdam) 100 "Arab revolutions and migrations", inter-NGO press releases by Migreurop 102 Lampedusa (Italy): Europe must not be afraid of democracy in North Africa 102 Until when will EU’s migration policy rest on South Mediterranean dictatorships? 103 Call for a EU solidary intervention in the Mediterranean 104 Call for a humanitarian evacuation of the 250 Somalian, Ethiopian and Erythrean refugees blocked in Benghazi 105 Emergency of a moratorium of repatriations towards Tunisia and of a decent reception of the Tunisians in the EU! 106 Deadly vice-like grip in the Mediterranean: hundreds of boat Peoples killed by international coalition’s inaction 108 A flotilla to stop the killing in the Mediterranean 109 The Mediterranean: NATO finally comes to the aid of shipwrecked migrants, but the European Union refuses to admit them 110 A NATO ship leaves dozens of migrants dying at sea in the Mediterranean 112 Bibliography 113 Introduction When peoples rebel, mobility in a secure environment so as to address the root causes of migrations"2. The the Union fortifies message is clear: in the field of migration, the itself EU wants to continue following the course that it has set so far. To do so, it will stick to In 2011, a report on the violence of extending and reactivating the agreements migration controls could not ignore the dra- struck with authoritarian regimes that have matic situations which occurred in the Medi- been ousted from power with new provisio- terranean, with the death by drowning or nal governements, following the same direc- exhaustion on board of overloaded and often tion. The Libyan National Transition Council damaged boats of several thousands exiles has understood this well and, hardly a month seeking to flee Libya, but lawfully prevented after the start of the uprising in Lybia, one of from doing so because of the surveillance of its leaders stated that his movement wished sea borders implemented in the south of the to combat illegal migration if it were to seize European Union (EU). While the fieldwork power, in particular by respecting the "frien- dship treaty" signed in 2008 by Silvio Ber- on which this report is based was mainly car- 3 ried out before the outbreak of the Libyan lusconi and Muammar Gaddafi . Far from uprising in February, Migreurop has closely hearing the call for change expressed by the followed this tragic demonstration of Wes- Arab revolts, Europe primarily seeks to perpe- tern selfishness when faced by the movement tuate the system established since the end of of refugees1. the 1990s that keeps migrants at a distance. A system that gives rise to many human This is because the revolutionary Arab rights violations, which Migreurop regularly movements, applauded – sometimes belate- reports. dly – by European governments, have not led the latter to reconsider the issue of popula- This 2010-2011 report focusses once tion movements from these southern Medi- again on two pillars of European migration terranean neighbours. While they included it policy that Migreurop has often described: in the agenda of the summit held in Brussels the subcontracting of controls and the deten- in June 2011, it was to express their concern tion of migrants and asylum seekers, this about "massive migratory movements pro- time surveyed in their maritime and eastern voked by the events (...)" and to decide to dimensions. The research conducted in seve- implement partnerships with neighbouring ral European ports and on the eastern Turkish countries to the south and east to "manage 2. Conclusions of the European Council of 23 and 24 June 2011. 1. See press releases in appendix 2. 3. AFP, 29 March 2011 6 border, shed new light on these mechanisms contracting, these trasfers of competencies are that have not been documented extensively to a further incentive for violations of rights and date. of the law because, as they happen in secret and there is lttle information about them, Subcontracting and if there is any at all. The development of transfer of migration detention practices is one of the most blatant examples of this. controls The externalisation of migratory controls Detention takes on many varied forms: the EU’s deci- In its commentary on its first map of sion, in the wake of the Tunisian revolution, ‘camps for foreigners in Europe’ in 2003, to deploy Frontex on the high seas off the Migreurop already raised the matter of the Tunisian and Libyan shores, in order to dis- diversity of administrative mechanisms suade the populations freed from the yoke of aimed at grouping migrants together, and dictatorship from heading towards Europe, called to "move beyond the sole reference is an example of the delocalisation of bor- to detention and consider any place used to ders, embodied by radars, drones and other exclude migrants as a camp" 4.
Recommended publications
  • Major International Tobacco Contraband Network Dismantled in Italy and Germany
    PRESS RELEASE No 23 /2014 8 December 2014 Major international tobacco contraband network dismantled in Italy and Germany On 27 November 2014, law enforcement authorities in Italy (Agenzia delle Dogane and Guardia di Finanza) and Germany (Zollkriminalamt Köln and Zollfahndungsamt Berlin) succeeded in dismantling an international tobacco contraband network. The European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) contributed to the joint efforts that led to this successful operation. Under the coordination of the Prosecutors of Turin and Frankfurt/Oder, law enforcement officials searched a cigarette production plant near Turin which was found to be producing “made in Italy” cigarettes destined in part for the illegal market in the EU. Investigations are continuing, but to date over 10 persons have been arrested and a large amount of documents detailing financial transactions concerning this traffic were seized. The network produced cigarettes in the EU. It then simulated fictitious exports outside the EU or carried out real exports to third countries and subsequently smuggled the cigarettes back into the EU with the aim of avoiding the applicable customs duties and taxes. It is estimated that the harm caused to the Italian budget alone is in excess of €90 million. The final figures are likely to be much higher. OLAF had, since 2012, investigated activities linked to this network and cooperated in the criminal investigations organised jointly by the Italian and German authorities that led to this operation. In this context, OLAF organised a coordination meeting in autumn 2013 with judicial and law enforcement authorities of these countries and cooperated with several other EU Member States (Belgium, Hungary, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and Slovakia) and third countries (Moldavia, Ukraine).
    [Show full text]
  • Arab Uprisings and Armed Forces: Between Openness and Resistance
    SSR PAPER 2 Arab Uprisings and Armed Forces: Between Openness and Resistance Derek Lutterbeck DCAF DCAF a centre for security, development and the rule of law SSR PAPER 2 Arab Uprisings and Armed Forces Between Openness and Resistance Derek Lutterbeck DCAF The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) is an international foundation whose mission is to assist the international community in pursuing good governance and reform of the security sector. The Centre develops and promotes norms and standards, conducts tailored policy research, identifies good practices and recommendations to promote democratic security sector governance, and provides in‐country advisory support and practical assistance programmes. SSR Papers is a flagship DCAF publication series intended to contribute innovative thinking on important themes and approaches relating to security sector reform (SSR) in the broader context of security sector governance (SSG). Papers provide original and provocative analysis on topics that are directly linked to the challenges of a governance‐driven security sector reform agenda. SSR Papers are intended for researchers, policy‐makers and practitioners involved in this field. ISBN 978‐92‐9222‐180‐5 © 2011 The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces EDITORS Alan Bryden & Heiner Hänggi PRODUCTION Yury Korobovsky COPY EDITOR Cherry Ekins COVER IMAGE © Suhaib Salem/Reuters The views expressed are those of the author(s) alone and do not in any way reflect the views of the institutions referred to or
    [Show full text]
  • Arab Spring’ ―Some Thoughts on the Civil-Military Relations―
    The Armies in the ‘Arab Spring’ ―Some Thoughts on the Civil-Military Relations― Akifumi Ikeda Eva Bellin, a leading political scientist on the contemporary Arab world, once argued the robustness of authoritarianism in the region as an outcome of the extraordinary capacity and will of the coercive apparatuses, the military in particular, to repress any sort of protestation from among the public.1 She was astounded, together with most other analysts, as the phenomena known by the name of ‘Arab Spring’ unfolded and those deeply entrenched authoritarian regimes started stumbling one by one, with some of them being rapidly overthrown. Yet, she maintains the basic appropriateness of her previous arguments, as the variation in the uprisings and their consequences tend to confirm that the central insight, that is to say the coercive apparatus’ will to repress, determined the fates of those regimes.2 Moderate Cases: Tunisia and Egypt In fact, relatively peaceful processes of regime change were seen in Tunisia and Egypt, where the armed forces remained at least politically neutral and/or 1 Eva R. Bellin, "The Robustness of Authoritarianism in the Middle East: Exceptionalism in Comparative Perspective," Comparative Politics, 36 (2) (2004). 2 Bellin, "Reconsidering the Robustness of Authoritarianism: Lessons of the Arab Spring," Comparative Politics, 44 (2) (2012). maintained a non-interventionist attitude towards the process and, by and large, refrained from violent repression against the mass protestations. In a way, it was a manifesto that the military is a national, professional and integrated institution which serves the interest of the nation and not that of the regime.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prospect of Libya
    FHSMUN GULF COAST 7 UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL THE SITUATION IN LIBYA Author: Brian D. Sutliff “The prospect of Libya in freefall should give all pause, especially the vulnerable neighbours.”1 “…ensuring the democratic rights of the Libyan people, the need for a consensual government based on the principle of separation of powers, oversight and balance between them, as well as the need to empower state institutions like the Government of National Accord so that they can address the serious challenges ahead, respect for the Libyan judiciary and its independence.”2 Introduction In the aftermath of the Arab Spring of 2011 and subsequent regime changes in Egypt and Tunisia, the overthrow of Muammar Qaddafi’s3 42-year long reign unleashed violence and reprisals that continue to rend Libya’s fragile social fabric and threaten to destabilize the broader region of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). While the Fund for Peace currently ranks Libya as the 28th most fragile country, simultaneously the Fund ranks Libya as experiencing the most severe deterioration of its situation over the last 10 years (2009-2019).4 Renewed violence and continued power struggles exacerbate existing regional and/or ethnic/tribal rivalries within Libya, while also attracting the attention of both neighboring and global powers. The violence and instability of the past 8 years, exemplified by General Khalifa Hiftar’s renewed assault on Tripoli, starkly illustrate the profound need for a just and enduring political solution. Scale of the Problem The estimates for the numbers of Libyans killed, wounded, and displaced, including those who have fled the country, do not garner the same attention and focus as the horrific totals emanating from Syria, but Libya’s population is approximately 35% that of Syria’s 1 International Crisis Group (ICG), “The Libyan Political Agreement: Time for a Reset”, Middle East and North Africa Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Activity-Report-2004
    2004 Annual Report 1 © SECI Regional Center for Combating Transborder Crime Reproduction is authorized provided that the source is acknowledged. Printed in Bucharest, Romania April, 2005 2 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ATTF Anti-Terrorism Task Force DEA Drug Enforcement Administration EU European Union EC European Commission DHS Department of Homeland Security FBI Federal Bureau of Investigation GUUAM Georgia, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, Moldova ICMPD International Center for Migration Policy and Development IOM International Organization for Migration CEI Central European Initiative JCC Joint Cooperation Committee NFP National Focal Point NGO Non Governmental Organization MOU Memorandum of Understanding OSCE Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe OSD Operational Support Department RACVIAC Regional Arms Control and Verification Information and Assistance Center SALW Small Arms and Light Weapons SECI Southeast European Cooperative Initiative SECI Center Regional Center for Combating Transborder Crime SEE South East Europe SEEPAG South East European Prosecutors Advisory Group SEESAC South Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons SPOC Stability Pact Initiative against Organized Crime TF Task Force THB Trafficking in Human Beings USSS United States Secret Service WCO World Customs Organization WMD Weapons of Mass Destruction ZKA German Customs Investigation Office (Zollkriminalamt) 3 1 Forewords 1.1. JCC Chairman, Dr. Ferenc Banfi The SECI Regional Centre for Combating Transborder Crime, with the support of the 12 Member Countries, the two Permanent Advisors (Interpol and World Customs Organisation), together with the Observer Countries and organisations, has achieved in quite a short time considerable success in tackling organized crime in the region. The future development of the SECI Centre, outlined in our Strategy for the period 2005-2010, describes a flexible and effective regional law enforcement tool, capable of assuming a leading role in South-Eastern European response to cross-border crime.
    [Show full text]
  • An Integrated Civil Police Force for the European Union
    AN INTEGRATED CIVIL POLICE FORCE FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION TASKS, PROFILE AND DOCTRINE CARLO JEAN CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN POLICY STUDIES BRUSSELS The Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) is an independent policy research institute in Brussels. Its mission is to produce sound analytical research leading to constructive solutions to the challenges facing Europe today. As a research institute, CEPS takes no position on matters of policy. The views expressed are entirely those of the author. Carlo Jean is currently Professor of Strategic Studies at LUISS (Libera Università Internazionale di Studi Sociali) in Rome. He is a retired Lieutenant General of the Italian Army, former Military Advisor to the Italian President of the Republic and Commander of the Centre of High Defence Studies, Rome. He served as Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairman in Office for the implementation of parts of the Dayton- Paris Peace Accords. Professor Jean has published extensively on security and military issues, geopolitics and geo-economics. The author would like to express his gratitude to Brigadier General Vincent Coeurderoy of the French Gendarmerie, IPTF Commissioner in the UNMIBiH, and to Colonel Vincenzo Coppola of the Italian Carabinieri and former Commander of the SFOR-MSU for their advice and support. ISBN 92-9079- 379-1 © Copyright 2002, Centre for European Policy Studies. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means – electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise – without the prior permission of the Centre for European Policy Studies. Centre for European Policy Studies Place du Congrès 1, B-1000 Brussels Tel: 32 (0) 2 229.39.11 Fax: 32 (0) 2 219.41.51 e-mail: [email protected] internet: http://www.ceps.be CONTENTS Executive Summary ..........................................................................................................1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 7644/1/05 REV 1 DCL 1 VG DG F 2A Delegations Will
    Council of the European Union Brussels, 13 January 2016 (OR. en) 7644/1/05 REV 1 DCL 1 CRIMORG 31 DECLASSIFICATION of document: ST 7644/1/05 REV 1 RESTREINT UE dated: 2 May 2005 new status: Public Subject: EVALUATIONREPORT THIRD ROUND OF MUTUAL EVALUATIONS "EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION AND INTELLIGENCE BETWEEN EUROPOL AND THE MEMBER STATES AND BETWEEN THE MEMBER STATES RESPECTIVELY" REPORT ON ITALY Delegations will find attached the declassified version of the above document. The text of this document is identical to the previous version. 7644/1/05 REV 1 DCL 1 VG DG F 2A EN RESTREINT UE COUNCIL OF Brussels, 2 May 2005 THE EUROPEAN UNION 7644/1/05 REV 1 RESTREINT UE CRIMORG 31 EVALUATION REPORT ON THE THIRD ROUND OF MUTUAL EVALUATIONS "EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION AND INTELLIGENCE BETWEEN EUROPOL AND THE MEMBER STATES AND BETWEEN THE MEMBER STATES RESPECTIVELY" REPORT ON ITALY 7644/1/05 REV 1 EL/ld 1 DG H III RESTREINT UE EN RESTREINT UE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 3 2. GENERAL INFORMATION AND STRUCTURES ................................................................... 4 3. INTERNAL ORGANISATION OF THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ........................ 38 4. EXTERNAL EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ..................................................................... 40 5. EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION BETWEEN MEMBER STATES AND EUROPOL ......... 41 6. EVALUATION BY EXPERT TEAM ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Orientamento Alle Carriere in Divisa
    con il sostegno di ORIENTAMENTO ALLE CARRIERE IN DIVISA Alcuni sognano il successo, altri si attivano per raggiungerlo Un lavoro stabile e duraturo Scopri le opportunità fornite dalle FORZE ARMATE e dalle Una brillante carriera FORZE DI POLIZIA in divisa per indossare la divisa Una laurea triennale e/o magistrale FORZE ARMATE FORZE DI POLIZIA Si occupano prevalentemente della difesa del territorio Intervengono per tutelare l’ordine e la sicurezza pubblica e intervengono in casi di calamità naturali Esercito Marina Aeronautica Arma dei Carabinieri* Guardia di Polizia Polizia Italiano Militare Militare (Corpo Forestale dal Finanza di Stato Penitenziaria 2016 inglobato nei CC) CORPI MILITARI CORPI CIVILI * L’Arma dei Carabinieri, oltre a rappresentare un Corpo di Polizia, è la quarta Forza Armata, con compiti di Polizia Militare FORZE ARMATE FORZE DI POLIZIA Per entrare a far parte delle Forze Armate e delle UFFICIALI DIRETTORI/FUNZIONARI Forze di Polizia è necessario partecipare a dei Concorsi pubblici (aperti a tutti i cittadini italiani di entrambi i sessi in possesso di determinati MARESCIALLI/ISPETTORI ISPETTORI requisiti), oppure a dei Concorsi interni (riservati al personale delle Amministrazioni in divisa – utili VOLONTARI/AGENTI AGENTI per la carriera interna). Piramide dei Ruoli del personale Scansiona con il tuo telefono questo QrCode e scarica le guide gratuite ai concorsi CORPI CONCORSI UFFICIALI MILITARI FORMAZIONE LAUREA GRADO STIPENDIO 5 anni Magistrale Tenente Mensile (da subito) Accademie Militari Esercito, Marina, Aeronautica
    [Show full text]
  • Politics by Other Means: Conflicting Interests in Libya's Security Sector
    20 Politics by Other Means Conflicting Interests in Libya’s Security Sector by Wolfram Lacher and Peter Cole A Working Paper of the Small Arms Survey/Security Assessment in North Africa project, with support from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands, the Royal Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, and the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Copyright Published in Switzerland by the Small Arms Survey © Small Arms Survey, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva 2014 Published in October 2014 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the Small Arms Survey, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Publications Manager, Small Arms Survey, at the address below. Small Arms Survey Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies 47 Avenue Blanc, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Series editor: Matthew Johnson Copy-edited by Tania Inowlocki Proofread by Stephanie Huitson Typeset in Optima and Palatino by Frank Benno Junghanns Printed in France by GPS ISBN 978-2-940548-07-1 2 Small Arms Survey Working Paper 20 Lacher and Cole Politics by Other Means 3 The Small Arms Survey The Small Arms Survey is an independent research project located at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva, Switzerland. Established in 1999, the project is supported by the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs and current contributions from the Govern- ments of Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 5 January 2009
    United Nations E/CN.7/2009/7 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 5 January 2009 Original: English Commission on Narcotic Drugs Fifty-second session Vienna, 11-20 March 2008 Item 6 (a) of the provisional agenda* Illicit drug traffic and supply: world situation with regard to drug trafficking and action taken by subsidiary bodies of the Commission Provision of international assistance to the most affected States neighbouring Afghanistan Report of the Executive Director Summary Data collected in Afghanistan: Opium Poppy Survey 2008, Executive Summary, a publication prepared by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and the Ministry of Counter Narcotics of Afghanistan, show that 159,000 hectares of land were under opium poppy cultivation in 2008, a decrease of 19 per cent compared with 2007. In 2008, however, favourable weather conditions resulted in the highest opium yields ever (48.8 kg per hectare) compared with the already high yield recorded in 2007 (42.5 kg per hectare). Afghanistan produced an extraordinary 7,700 tons of opium in 2008 (6 per cent less than in 2007), thereby remaining the largest supplier of opiates in the world (accounting for over 90 per cent of global production). Afghanistan’s neighbouring States are affected by trafficking in opium, morphine and refined heroin, as well as by the diversion and smuggling of precursor chemicals, the operation of clandestine laboratories illicitly manufacturing drugs and the abuse of and addiction to opiates. In order to seek solutions to the drug problem, affected States are coming together through the Rainbow Strategy, which is based on the principle of shared responsibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Italy OP 1 and Related Matters from OP 5, OP 6, OP 8 (A), (B), (C) And
    OP 1 and related matters from OP 5, OP 6, OP 8 (a), (b), (c) and OP 10 State: Italy Date of Report: 27 October 2004 Date of Addendum 1: 05 December 2005 Date of Addebdum 2: 10 December 2007 Did you make one of the following Remarks statements or is your country a State (information refers to the if YES, indicate relevant information (i.e. signing, accession, ratification, Party to or Member State of one of the YES page of the English version entering into force, etc) following Conventions, Treaties and of the report or an official Arrangements ? web site) General statement on non- 1 possession of WMD 1. EU Strategy against proliferation of WMD General statement on commitment to 2 X 2. Committed to the universalization and full implementation of multilateral disarmament and non-proliferation instruments in the field of disarmament and non-proliferation General statement on non-provision 3 of WMD and related materials to non- X Does not provide any form of support to either States or non-State actors State actors Biological Weapons Convention 4 X Ratified 8 October 1974 (BWC) Chemical Weapons Convention 5 X Ratified 18 November 1995 (CWC) Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty 6 X Ratified 24 April 1975 (NPT) The information in the matrices originates primarily from national reports and is complemented by official government information, including that made available to inter-governmental organizations. The matrices are prepared under the direction of the 1540 Committee. The 1540 Committee intends to use the matrices as a reference tool for facilitating technical assistance and to enable the Committee to continue to enhance its dialogue with States on their implementation of Security Council Resolution 1540.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Theory of Military Behavior in the Arab Uprisings: 'Pro-State'
    Sarihan, A. (2021). A new theory of military behavior in the Arab uprisings: ‘Pro- Journal State’ and ‘Pro-Regime’. Journal of International Studies, 14(1), 9-23. of International doi:10.14254/2071-8330.2021/14-1/1 Studies © Foundation A new theory of military behavior in the of International Studies, 2021 Arab uprisings: ‘Pro-State’ and ‘Pro- © CSR, 2021 Papers Scientific Regime’ Ali Sarihan Georgetown University, Department of Government, USA [email protected] Abstract. Many articles have been published on civil-military relations. But the Received: March, 2020 unexpected events circle that was the so-called Arab spring or Arab uprisings has 1st Revision: created a gap that should be filled by scholars. The article sets forth a new December, 2020 theoretical framework that is pro-state and pro-regime by applying this Accepted: March, 2021 framework respectively to the two different cases Tunisia and Libya. This article provides a comparison of the military’s behavior in Tunisia, which led to the DOI: success of the uprisings, and the military’s behavior in Libya, where the army 10.14254/2071- fought protesters and precipitated in the NATO intervention and about 9 months 8330.2021/14-1/1 of armed struggle. The data indicates that the military’s response to the social protests played an undeniable role in the diverse outcomes of the uprisings. Pro- state and pro-regime framework aids in the exploration of this response by integrating rational choice and institutionalism to develop a comprehensive lens through which we can view this phenomenon. Keywords: Pro-state, Pro-regime, rational choice, institutionalism, Tunisia, Libya and the Arab uprisings.
    [Show full text]