DOCSLIB.ORG

Hawaiian Cultural Systems and Archaeological Site Patterns

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hawaiian Cultural Systems and Archaeological Site Patterns Hawaiian cultural systems and archaeological site patterns Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Hommon, Robert J. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 30/09/2021 05:44:32 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/554776 HAWAIIAN CULTURAL SYSTEMS AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE PATTERNS by Robert John Hoimnon A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the. DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of ' MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 2 STATEMENT BY.AUTHOR This' thesis-has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library, Brief quotations.from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author, . SIGNED; APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved.on the date shown below; g s - 7 2 .: ■WILLIAM A,U LONGACRE - Date Associate.Professor of Anthropology TO JIGGIE WITH ALOHA iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to acknowledge the efforts of. the following people who helped in the preparation of this thesis 0 First5 I wish to thank the three members of my thesis committees Dr0 William A„ Longacre (chairman)| Dra T0 Patrick Cnlbertj and Dr0 Raymond H 0 Thompson, as well as Mr a Edwin Ne Ferdon, Jre, for their patience, aid and con­ structive criticism during the years of its preparation» I gratefully acknowledge the special efforts of Dre Harry T0 Getty whose aid in smoothing out the administrative process enabled me to write and submit the manuscript while remaining in Honolulu0 I particularly wish to thank Mrsc Hazel Gillie who typed the final draft for submission6 I am indebted to the following archaeologists for the infor­ mation and points of view derived from countless discussions of Hawaiian archaeology and ethnohistorys Mr0 William Barrera| Dro Kenneth P0 Emory; Dr. P. Bion Griffin; Mr. Patrick V. Kirch; . Dr. T. Stell Newman; Mr. Paul H. Rosendahl; Dr. Yosihiko H. Sinoto; and Dr. H. David Tuggle. I am grateful to Dr. Marshall D. Sahlins, Mrs. Dorothy Barrere and Mrs. Marion Kelly for providing information concerning the ethnohistory of ancient Hawaii. To my wife, Jiggie, I am deeply grateful for the patience she displayed and the confidence she instilled during the final stages of the production of this thesis. iv TABLE OF'CONTENTS - Page ABSTRACT 0 ........ ........... vii Xo INTRODUCTION .. ......... ...... ...... X Purpose and Limitations . ......... X GeographicaX Background „ . „ . ..... ....... U The TemporaX Framework . „ . ......... 6 Ethnohistoric Sources . ..... 7 The PotentiaX of Hawaiian ArchaeoXogy ........ XU PART I t THE HAWAIIAN PRIMITIVE STATE MODEL .... 18 2. PRIMITIVE STATE SOCIETY: FUNDAMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS . 19 The Value of Definition . ...... 20 The Sociopolitical Aspect . ..... ........ 21 Monopoly of Political:Powers The Mechanism of Integration . © . @ . .%.. ... * . * .... 22 , Kin and Powers Integrating Mechanisms and Levels of Integration ................. 26 The State Society; An Outline of the Maximal Corporate Unit ....... V, ........ 28 The Socioeconomic Classes » . ....... 32 Other Aspects of the Primitive State Model ...... 33 The Economic System . .. ........ 3li The Religious System ............... 35 30: THE HAWAIIAN PRIMITIVE STATE HYPOTHESIS- b'. ..... 37 The Hawaiian Community . ....... .... „ „ 37 The Hawaiian Government . ........ h i The Hawaiian Primitive State ... ..... ...... 68 . PART II; THE HAWAIIAN PRIMITIVE STATE HYPOTHESES; THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE ....... 81 h o A FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF HAWAIIAN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES o e . # . o 00 o o 0.0 . o . o . .0 . o . 82 v TABLE OF CONTENTS— Continued Page Archaeological Sites of Economic Function 0 85 Archaeological Sites of Food Production 91 Archaeological Sites of Production of Non-Food ItemS o o » o » » o o o o'o 6 o d o dd e d d O O llU Archaeological Sites of Storage Function » d . » o 118 Archaeological Sites of Social Function 120 Trails and Gaming Sites . * ...... 120 Habitation Sites ■ ................. 125 Archaeological Sites of Political and Religious PunC UlOn o e e o. 0 . o . c 0 .«e . .. o o lk3 Sites of Worship and Political Administration . lij.3 Sites Associated With Warfare ........... 161 THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF HAWAIIAN SITES AND THE PRIMITIVE STATE HYPOTHESIS; SUMMARY . ........... 168 The Community . » . « .... .... 168 The Government. .. , . .......... 171 LIST OF REFERENCES . .......... 175 ABSTRACT In Part Is a model of the characteristic features that serve to distinguish a primitive state society from other types of socio­ cultural systems is presented* The ethnographic, historic and ethno- historic data concerning the sociocultural systems that existed in the Hawaiian islands, prior to and for a few years after contact with European cultural influences are then compared with the model The Hawaiian community segment, governmental segment and their interre­ lationships are emphasized* The Hawaiian primitive state hypothesis, that is,"primitive state societies had evolved in the Hawaiian islands prior to contact" is supported by these datas In Part II, the portion of the archaeological data that is available in Hawaiian non-portable artifacts, classified according to sociocultural function (economic, social and ideological) and pertinent sociopolitical groups (family, community, and supra- community or state society) is presented in support of the Hawaiian primitive state hypothesis* vii CHAPTER 1 ' INTRODUCTION ; Purpose and Limitations The introduction is presented in five sections* The first outlines the logical framework and hypotheses discussed in the body of the thesis and sets forth the limitations of subject matter and approach that I have found, necessary to impose in order to produce a thesis of manageable size* The second section sketches the geography of the islands* Section three presents the temporal framework that is important to the present study. A brief discussion of the ethno- historic sources comprises the fourth section and five concerns the potential of Hawaiian archaeology. The main body of the thesis is presented in two parts. The first part is an exploration of the hypothesis that at least one of the Hawaiian sociocultural systems operating at the time of first ■ European contact (1778) was a state rather than a chiefdom. The method is used to present various parts of the Hawaiian sociocultural system as they have been observed and analyzed by various ethnohis- toric authors and to compare these data with commonly accepted features of the type of society known as the state. The ethnohistoric sources are those written by native, European and American authors based upon personal observation, and participation as well as library research during a period of nearly two centuries from 1778 to the present day. Some of the problems involved in using such sources in the present study are discussed in the fourth section. The second part of the thesis5 entitled "The Archaeological Pattern," is an outline of the various types of non-portable archae­ ological artifacts of Hawaii, their formal attributes, their function^ and their spatial patterns as they were.related to the operating sociocultural systems in general and to the factors. relating to the statehood hypothesis in particular. In view of the general goals of the thesis — the delineation of an entire sociocultural system on the one hand, and a discussion of a large portion of the available archaeological material on the other — both data and approach had to be severely limited for reasons of space and clarity of presentation, .Limitations on data consist primarily of a lack of emphasis on the details of various ideal types developed in both the archaeological and the ethnohistoric literature through the years in favor of examples which suggest the real ranges of cultural phenomena. This real-ideal dichotomy is discussed fur­ ther in the fifth section. The limitations of approach can be summarized by the word "synchronic," Since an operating system and the spatial pattern of the archaeological features associated with it are subjects of re­ search, a. single relatively short period would provide the appropriate data for this study. In view of the possibility that the development toward statehood may have occurred relatively late in the aboriginal sequence, the ideal period, of study would seem to be immediately prior to initial European contact. Some ethnohistoric and archaeological data can be identified as pertaining to the Hawaiian culture as it operated immediately prior to European contacte The most obvious examples would be those cultural traits described in the journals of the Cook expedition. These sources are, of course, rather limited in scope.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Dread Taboo, Human Sacrifice, and Pearl Harbor
    The Dread Taboo, Human Sacrifice, and Pearl Harbor RDKHennan The word taboo, or tabu, is well known to everyone, but it is especially interesting that it is one of but two or possibly three words from the Polynesian language to have been adopted by the English-speaking world. While the original meaning of the taboo was "Sacred" or "Set apart," usage has given it a decidedly secular meaning, and it has become a part of everyday speech all over the world. In the Hawaiian lan­ guage the word is "kapu," and in Honolulu we often see a sign on a newly planted lawn or in a park that reads, not, "Keep off the Grass," but, "Kapu." And to understand the history and character of the Hawaiian people, and be able to interpret many things in our modern life in these islands, one must have some knowledge of the story of the taboo in Hawaii. ANTOINETTE WITHINGTON, "The Dread Taboo," in Hawaiian Tapestry Captain Cook's arrival in the Hawaiian Islands signaled more than just the arrival of western geographical and scientific order; it was the arrival of British social and political order, of British law and order as well. From Cook onward, westerners coming to the islands used their own social­ civil codes as a basis to judge, interpret, describe, and almost uniformly condemn Hawaiian social and civil codes. With this condemnation, west­ erners justified the imposition of their own order on the Hawaiians, lead­ ing to a justification of colonialism and the loss of land and power for the indigenous peoples.
    [Show full text]
  • Ka'u Coast, Island of Hawai'i Reconnaissance Survey
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Pacific West Region, Honolulu Office Ka‘u Coast, Island of Hawai‘i Reconnaissance Survey DEDICATION Ka‘ū, hiehie i ka makani. Ka‘ū, regal in the gales. An expression of admiration for the district of Ka‘ū, or for a stately or outstanding person of that district (Mary Kawena Pukui, ‘Ōlelo No‘eau, 1983) In memory of Jimmyleen Keolalani Hanoa (1960-2006). Her life and work as a visionary leader in the Hawaiian community of Ka‘ū, and her roles as mother, friend and facilitator for cultural education programs, live on. We are all better people for having her present in our lives and having had the opportunity of a lifetime, to share her knowledge and aloha. Mahalo, me ke aloha pumehana. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 SUMMARY………………………………………………………………………………. 1 2 BACKGROUND………………………………………………………………………….2 2.1 Background of the Study…………………………………………………………………..……… 2 2.2 Purpose and Scope of the Study Document…………………………….……………………… 2 2.3 Evaluation Criteria…………………………………………....................................................... 3 2.3.1 National Significance……………………………………………………..……………… 3 2.3.2 Suitability………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 2.3.3 Feasibility…………………………………………………………………………………. 5 2.3.4 Management Options…………………………………………………….……………… 5 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA………………………………………………6 3.1 Regional Context………………………………………………………………………………….. 6 3.2 Location and Maps………………………………………………………………………………… 7 3.3 Land Use and Ownership………………………………………………………………….……… 8 3.4 Resources………………………………………………………………….……………………… 10 3.4.1 Geology and Soils……………………………………………………….……………… 10 3.4.2 Vegetation………………………………………………………………...……………... 12 3.4.3 Wildlife………………………………………………………...................………………13 3.4.4 Marine Resources……………………………………………………….……………… 16 3.4.5 Pools, Ponds and Estuaries…………………………………………………………….18 3.4.6 Cultural and Archeological Resources……………………………………………….. 20 3.4.7 Recreational Resources and Community Use……………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Visibility Analysis of Oahu Heiau
    Visibility Analysis of Oahu Heiau A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN GEOGRAPHY May 2012 By Kepa Lyman Thesis Committee: Matthew McGranaghan, Chair Hong Jiang William Chapman Keywords: heiau, intervisibility, viewshed analysis Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................... III LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................................... IV INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 5 CHAPTER OUTLINE ..................................................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER I. HAWAIIAN HEIAU ............................................................................................................ 8 HEIAU AS SYMBOL ..................................................................................................................................... 8 HEIAU AS FORTRESS ................................................................................................................................. 12 TYPES ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture, Power, and Community in Kaupō, Maui
    On the Cloak of Kings: Agriculture, Power, and Community in Kaupō, Maui By Alexander Underhill Baer A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Patrick V. Kirch Professor Kent G. Lightfoot Professor Anthony R. Byrne Spring 2015 On the Cloak of Kings: Agriculture, Power, and Community in Kaupō, Maui Copyright © 2015 By Alexander Underhill Baer Table of Contents List of Figures iv List of Tables viii Acknowledgements x CHAPTER I: OPENING THE WATERS OF KAUPŌ Introduction 1 Kaupō’s Natural and Historical Settings 3 Geography and Environment 4 Regional Ethnohistory 5 Plan of the Dissertation 7 CHAPTER 2: UNDERSTANDING KAUPŌ: THEORETICAL APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF POWER AND PRODUCTION Introduction 9 Last of the Primary States 10 Of Chiefdoms and States 12 Us Versus Them: Evolutionism Prior to 1960 14 The Evolution Revolution: Evolutionism and the New Archaeology 18 Evolution Evolves: Divergent Approaches from the 1990s Through Today 28 Agriculture and Production in the Development of Social Complexity 32 Lay of the Landscape 36 CHAPTER 3: MAPPING HISTORY: KAUPŌ IN MAPS AND THE MAHELE Introduction 39 Social and Spatial Organization in Polynesia 40 Breaking with the Past: New Forms of Social Organization and Land Distribution 42 The Great Mahele 47 Historic Maps of Hawaiʻi and Kaupō 51 Kalama Map, 1838 55 Hawaiian Government Surveys and Maps 61 Post-Mapping: Kaupō Land
    [Show full text]
  • Heiau and Noted Places of the Makena–Keone'ö'io Region
    HEIAU AND NOTED PLACES OF THE MAKENA–KEONE‘Ö‘IO REGION OF HONUA‘ULA DESCRIBED IN HISTORICAL ACCOUNTS (1870S-1930S) This section of the study presents readers with verbatim accounts of heiau and other cultural properties as described by researchers in the region of Honua‘ula—with emphasis on the ahupua‘a of Ka‘eo—since 1916. Detailed research was conducted in collections of the Bishop Museum, Maui Historical Society, Mission Children’s Society Library-Hawaiian Historical Society, and Hawaii State Archives as a part of this study. While a significant collection of references to traditional-cultural properties and historical sites was found, only limited and inconclusive documentation pertaining to the “Kalani Heiau” (Site 196) on the Garcia family property was located. Except for documentation associated with two kuleana awarded during the Mähele of 1848, no other information pertaining to sites on the property was located in the historical accounts. In regards to the “Kalani Heiau,” the earliest reference to a heiau of that name was made in 1916, though the site was not visited, or the specific location given. It was not until 1929, that a specific location for “Kalani Heiau” was recorded by W. Walker (Walker, ms. 1930-31), who conducted an archaeological survey on Maui, for the Bishop Museum. The location of Walker’s “Site No. 196” coincides with that of the “Kalani Heiau” on the Garcia property, but it also coincides with the area claimed by Mähele Awardee, Maaweiki (Helu 3676)—a portion of the claim was awarded as a house lot for Maaweiki. While only limited information of the heiau, and other sites on the property could be located, it is clear that Site No.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary for Hawaiian and Other Polynesian Terms
    Glossary for Hawaiian and Other Polynesian Terms Pronunciation Hawaiian vowels are as in English: a, e, i, o, and u. But with respect to pronunciation, the letter “a” is pronounced as the soft ah sound in papa; “e” as the ā sound in play; “i” as the ē sound in need; “o” as used in bowl; and “u” as the ew sound in tune. Diacritical marks are used to indicate stress on particular vowels, and as glottal stops. Te macron (called kahakō in Hawaiian) is used to stress and elongate any of the vowel sounds. For example, the ā sound in pāhoe- hoe (sheet lava) is stressed and lengthened, as in pahh-ho-ay-ho-ay. Te reverse apostrophe (called an okina in Hawaiian) is used as a glot- tal stop, as in the closed throat sound that should precede formation of the word ‘ahi (pronounced ah-hee), or between sounds, as in Punalu‘u (pronounced poo-nah-lew-ew). Certain vowel combinations (diph- thongs) are also pronounced in a manner dissimilar to the way they are pronounced in English, with stress on the frst vowel. For instance, the “ou” sound in Hawaiian is pronounced with stress on the o, as in pouli © Te Editor(s) (if applicable) and Te Author(s), under exclusive license 247 to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 E. W. Glazier, Tradition-Based Natural Resource Management, Palgrave Studies in Natural Resource Management, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14842-3 248 Glossary for Hawaiian and Other Polynesian Terms (Hawaiian for dark or eclipse, pronounced poh-lee).
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of the Hawaiian People
    0 A BRIEF HISTORY OP 'Ill& HAWAIIAN PEOPLE ff W. D. ALEXANDER PUBLISHED BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE HAWAIIAN KINGDOM NEW YORK,: . CINCINNATI•:• CHICAGO AMERICAN BOOK C.OMPANY Digitized by Google ' .. HARVARD COLLEGELIBRAllY BEQUESTOF RCLANOBUr.ll,' , ,E DIXOII f,'.AY 19, 1936 0oPYBIGRT, 1891, BY AlilBIOAN BooK Co)[PA.NY. W. P. 2 1 Digit zed by Google \ PREFACE AT the request of the Board of Education, I have .fi. endeavored to write a simple and concise history of the Hawaiian people, which, it is hoped, may be useful to the teachers and higher classes in our schools. As there is, however, no book in existence that covers the whole ground, and as the earlier histories are entirely out of print, it has been deemed best to prepare not merely a school-book, but a history for the benefit of the general public. This book has been written in the intervals of a labo­ rious occupation, from the stand-point of a patriotic Hawaiian, for the young people of this country rather than for foreign readers. This fact will account for its local coloring, and for the prominence given to certain topics of local interest. Especial pains have been taken to supply the want of a correct account of the ancient civil polity and religion of the Hawaiian race. This history is not merely a compilation. It is based upon a careful study of the original authorities, the writer having had the use of the principal existing collections of Hawaiian manuscripts, and having examined the early archives of the government, as well as nearly all the existing materials in print.
    [Show full text]
  • Ka Moolelo O Kauai O Kukona Ka Mo’I O Ke Aupuni O Kauai, Huiia Me Kaula, Niihau, a Me Lehua I Na KA MOOLELO KAUA‘I’S Makahiki 1400
    Ka Moolelo o Kauai O Kukona ka mo’i o ke aupuni o Kauai, huiia me Kaula, Niihau, a me Lehua i na KA MOOLELO KAUA‘I’S makahiki 1400. Noloko mai no o Kukona kekahi lalani alii nana i hoomalu maluna o ka aina a hiki ia Kaumualii (hanauia 1778 a make 1824) a lilo ke aupuni ia Kamehameha i ka makahiki 1810 ma ke kuikahi mawaena o ke aupuni o Kauai a O KAUAI HERITAGE me ke aupuni o Kamehameha. O Manokalanipo ke keiki a Kukona. Oia ka mo’i i mele nui ia’i iloko o na mele e like me Nani Waialeale a me Kauai Beauty. O ke kumu o kona mele nui ia ana, no ka Holomua ka Naauao A Growing Society mea, oia ka mo’i o ka aina nei nana i kukulu i kona aupuni me ka hoonohonoho pono ana i na mahele aina like ole he moku a he ahupuaa me ka hoonoho ana i Ua holomua loa ka naauao o kanaka mamuli o ke akamai Kānaka Maoli (native Hawaiians) have lived in the area na alii maluna o kela me keia na lakou e lawelawe no ka pono o ka lahui. Mamuli o o ka noho alii ana o Manokalanipo. I kona wa i kukuluia’i surrounding Kānei‘olouma for several centuries. Upon keia papa hana, ua lako ka aina a lako ka ai a me ka i’a na kanaka. Ma ia hope mai na loko ia e like me ka mea kamaaina i keia au nei, a peia settling the area, Kānaka Maoli organized their system ikeia ka laha loa o ka maluhia maluna o ka aina a ua nui ke alohaia o ua mo’i nei.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Ethnography and Archaeology of Russian Fort Elisabeth State Historical Park, Waimea, Kaua'i
    Historical Ethnography and Archaeology of Russian Fort Elisabeth State Historical Park, Waimea, Kaua'i Peter R Mills Department ofAnthropology, University ofVermont Introduction There is a sign on the highway in Waimea, Kaua'i in the Hawaiian Islands with the words "Russian Fort" printed on it. Local residents use the same term to refer to the State Historical Park that the sign marks. I give this introduction not because it is the best, but because it is the one that everyone else gets. Fort Elisabeth was built in Waimea, Kaua' i following an alliance between Kaumuali'i, paramount chief of Kaua'i, and Georg Anton Schiffer of the Russian-American Company (RAC) in 1816. Georg Schaffer and the RAC were forced to leave Kaua'i in 1817 which left Kaumuali'i in sole control of the fort. Most tourists visiting the site are surprised to fmd that Russians were building forts in the Hawaiian Islands, but the story of Fort Elisabeth and two smaller forts (Alexander and Barclay) on the north shore of Kaua'i (Figure 1) has been "well-tilled" (Barratt 1988:v) for over a century (Alexander 1894; Barratt 1988:15-24; Bolkhovitinov 1973; Bradley 1942; Emerson 1900; Golder 1930; Gronski 1928; Jarves 1844:201-203; Mazour 1937; Mehnert 1939: 22-65; Okun 1951; Pierce 1965; Tumarkin 1964:134-166; Whitney 1838:48-51). On Kaua'i, Fort Elisabeth seems to be perceived as a cumbersome and obscure monument to 19th century European expansion, lacking in any connection to traditional Hawaiian landscapes. Within the academic community, little recent attention focuses on the fort other than Richard Pierce's Russia's Hawaiian Adventure 1815-1817 (1965) with a follow-up article by Bolkhovitinov (1973).
    [Show full text]
  • Kapa'a, Waipouli, Olohena, Wailua and Hanamā'ulu Island of Kaua'i
    CULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE KAPA‘A RELIEF ROUTE; KAPA‘A, WAIPOULI, OLOHENA, WAILUA AND HANAMĀ‘ULU ISLAND OF KAUA‘I by K. W. Bushnell, B.A. David Shideler, M.A. and Hallett H. Hammatt, PhD. Prepared for Kimura International by Cultural Surveys Hawai‘i, Inc. May 2004 Acknowledgements ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Cultural Surveys Hawai‘i wishes to acknowledge, first and foremost, the kūpuna who willingly took the time to be interviewed and graciously shared their mana‘o: Raymond Aiu, Valentine Ako, George Hiyane, Kehaulani Kekua, Beverly Muraoka, Alice Paik, and Walter (Freckles) Smith Jr. Special thanks also go to several individuals who shared information for the completion of this report including Randy Wichman, Isaac Kaiu, Kemamo Hookano, Aletha Kaohi, LaFrance Kapaka-Arboleda, Sabra Kauka, Linda Moriarty, George Mukai, Jo Prigge, Healani Trembath, Martha Yent, Jiro Yukimura, Joanne Yukimura, and Taka Sokei. Interviews were conducted by Tina Bushnell. Background research was carried out by Tina Bushnell, Dr. Vicki Creed and David Shideler. Acknowledgements also go to Mary Requilman of the Kaua‘i Historical Society and the Bishop Museum Archives staff who were helpful in navigating their respective collections for maps and photographs. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 A. Scope of Work............................................................................................................ 1 B. Methods......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table 4. Hawaiian Newspaper Sources
    OCS Study BOEM 2017-022 A ‘Ikena I Kai (Seaward Viewsheds): Inventory of Terrestrial Properties for Assessment of Marine Viewsheds on the Main Eight Hawaiian Islands U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Pacific OCS Region August 18, 2017 Cover image: Viewshed among the Hawaiian Islands. (Trisha Kehaulani Watson © 2014 All rights reserved) OCS Study BOEM 2017-022 Nā ‘Ikena I Kai (Seaward Viewsheds): Inventory of Terrestrial Properties for Assessment of Marine Viewsheds on the Eight Main Hawaiian Islands Authors T. Watson K. Ho‘omanawanui R. Thurman B. Thao K. Boyne Prepared under BOEM Interagency Agreement M13PG00018 By Honua Consulting 4348 Wai‘alae Avenue #254 Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96816 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Pacific OCS Region August 18, 2016 DISCLAIMER This study was funded, in part, by the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Environmental Studies Program, Washington, DC, through Interagency Agreement Number M13PG00018 with the US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of National Marine Sanctuaries. This report has been technically reviewed by the ONMS and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and has been approved for publication. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the US Government, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. REPORT AVAILABILITY To download a PDF file of this report, go to the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Environmental Studies Program Information System website and search on OCS Study BOEM 2017-022.
    [Show full text]
  • Kekuaokalani: an Historical Fiction Exploration of the Hawaiian Iconoclasm
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Undergraduate Honors Theses 2018-12-07 Kekuaokalani: An Historical Fiction Exploration of the Hawaiian Iconoclasm Alex Oldroyd Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studentpub_uht Part of the English Language and Literature Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Oldroyd, Alex, "Kekuaokalani: An Historical Fiction Exploration of the Hawaiian Iconoclasm" (2018). Undergraduate Honors Theses. 54. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studentpub_uht/54 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Honors Thesis KEKUAOKALANI: AN HISTORAL FICTION EXPLORATION OF THE HAWAIIAN ICONOCLASM by Alexander Keone Kapuni Oldroyd Submitted to Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of graduation requirements for University Honors English Department Brigham Young University December 2018 Advisor: John Bennion, Honors Coordinator: John Talbot ABSTRACT KEKUAOKALANI: AN HISTORAL FICTION EXPLORATION OF THE HAWAIIAN ICONOCLASM Alexander K. K. Oldroyd English Department Bachelor of Arts This thesis offers an exploration of the Hawaiian Iconoclasm of 1819 through the lens of an historical fiction novella. The thesis consists of two parts: a critical introduction outlining the theoretical background and writing process and the novella itself. 1819 was a year of incredible change on Hawaiian Islands. Kamehameha, the Great Uniter and first monarch of the Kingdom of Hawaiʻi, had recently died, thousands of the indigenous population were dying, and foreign powers were arriving with increasing frequency, bringing with them change that could not be undone.
    [Show full text]