DOCSLIB.ORG

Pagina 1 Di 7 23/01/2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pagina 1 Di 7 23/01/2015 Pagina 1 di 7 Print Highly pathogenic avian influenza, Chinese Taipei Close Information received on 21/01/2015 from Dr Ping-Cheng Yang, Vice President, Agriculture Technology Research Institute, Council of Agriculture, Hsinchu City, Chinese Taipei Summary Report type Follow-up report No. 5 Date of start of the event 07/01/2015 Date of pre-confirmation of the 11/01/2015 event Report date 21/01/2015 Date submitted to OIE 21/01/2015 Reason for notification Reoccurrence of a listed disease Date of previous occurrence 23/07/2014 Manifestation of disease Clinical disease Causal agent Highly pathogenic avian influenza virus Serotype H5N2 Nature of diagnosis Clinical, Laboratory (advanced) This event pertains to a defined zone within the country Immediate notification (12/01/2015) Follow-up report No. 1 (13/01/2015) Follow-up report No. 2 (15/01/2015) Related reports Follow-up report No. 3 (16/01/2015) Follow-up report No. 4 (19/01/2015) Follow-up report No. 5 (21/01/2015) New outbreaks (39) Outbreak 1 (yl-98) Dongshi Township, YUNLIN COUNTY Date of start of the outbreak 16/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 2200 900 900 Affected population Breeding geese Outbreak 2 (yl-102) Kouhu Township, YUNLIN COUNTY Date of start of the outbreak 16/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 2240 140 140 Affected population Geese Outbreak 3 (yl-91) Dongshi Township, YUNLIN COUNTY Date of start of the outbreak 16/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 11500 500 500 Affected population Geese Outbreak 4 (yl-95) Dongshi Township, YUNLIN COUNTY Date of start of the outbreak 16/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 3200 200 200 Affected population Geese http://www.oie.int/wahis_2/public/wahid.php/Reviewreport/Review?page_refer=Map... 23/01/2015 Pagina 2 di 7 Outbreak 5 (cy26) Dongshi Township, CHIAYI COUNTY Date of start of the outbreak 16/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 1500 1408 1408 92 0 Affected population Geese Outbreak 6 (ch6) Fangyuan Township, CHANGHUA COUNTY Date of start of the outbreak 16/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 7390 100 100 Affected population Geese Outbreak 7 (yl-82) Sihu Township, YUNLIN COUNTY Date of start of the outbreak 16/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 5000 4100 4100 Affected population Geese Outbreak 8 (yl-90) Dongshi Township, YUNLIN COUNTY Date of start of the outbreak 16/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 4760 260 260 Affected population Geese Outbreak 9 (kh5) Alian District, KAOHSIUNG Date of start of the outbreak 16/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 2930 2355 2355 575 0 Affected population Geese Outbreak 10 (pt65) Zhutian Township, PINGTUNG COUNTY Date of start of the outbreak 16/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 3200 3200 3200 Affected population Geese Outbreak 11 (kh3) Luzhu District, KAOHSIUNG Date of start of the outbreak 16/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 1904 68 68 1836 0 Affected population Geese Outbreak 12 (yl-92) Dongshi Township, YUNLIN COUNTY Date of start of the outbreak 16/01/2015 http://www.oie.int/wahis_2/public/wahid.php/Reviewreport/Review?page_refer=Map... 23/01/2015 Pagina 3 di 7 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 4800 1200 1200 Affected population Geese Outbreak 13 (yl-97) Dongshi Township, YUNLIN COUNTY Date of start of the outbreak 16/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 3600 100 100 Affected population Geese Outbreak 14 (yl-27) Dalin Township, CHIAYI COUNTY Date of start of the outbreak 16/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 1950 410 410 1540 0 Affected population Breeding geese Outbreak 15 (yl77) Sihu Township, YUNLIN COUNTY Date of start of the outbreak 16/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 900 400 400 Affected population Breeding geese Outbreak 16 (yl78) Sihu Township, YUNLIN COUNTY Date of start of the outbreak 16/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 1600 300 300 Affected population Breeding geese Outbreak 17 (pt67) Ligang Township, PINGTUNG COUNTY Date of start of the outbreak 16/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 2570 800 800 Affected population Geese Outbreak 18 (yl-81) Sihu Township, YUNLIN COUNTY Date of start of the outbreak 16/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 2550 420 420 Affected population Geese Outbreak 19 (kh4) Meinong District, KAOHSIUNG Date of start of the outbreak 16/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm http://www.oie.int/wahis_2/public/wahid.php/Reviewreport/Review?page_refer=Map... 23/01/2015 Pagina 4 di 7 Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 3000 160 160 2840 0 Affected population Ducks Outbreak 20 (ch7) Fangyuan Township, CHANGHUA COUNTY Date of start of the outbreak 16/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 9000 2565 2565 6435 0 Affected population Geese Outbreak 21 (yl-89) Mailiao Township, YUNLIN COUNTY Date of start of the outbreak 16/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 3550 250 250 Affected population Ducks Outbreak 22 (yl-101) Dongshi Township, YUNLIN COUNTY Date of start of the outbreak 16/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 3480 80 80 Affected population Geese Outbreak 23 (pt64) Zhutian Township, PINGTUNG COUNTY Date of start of the outbreak 16/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 2600 2600 2600 Affected population Geese Outbreak 24 (yl-79) Sihu Township, YUNLIN COUNTY Date of start of the outbreak 16/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 2200 200 200 Affected population Breeding geese Outbreak 25 (yl-80) Sihu Township, YUNLIN COUNTY Date of start of the outbreak 16/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 2000 200 200 Affected population Breeding geese Outbreak 26 (yl-109) Sihu Township, YUNLIN COUNTY Date of start of the outbreak 17/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 2200 400 400 http://www.oie.int/wahis_2/public/wahid.php/Reviewreport/Review?page_refer=Map... 23/01/2015 Pagina 5 di 7 Affected population Geese Outbreak 27 (yl-110) Sihu Township, YUNLIN COUNTY Date of start of the outbreak 17/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Birds 5500 500 500 Affected population Breeding geese Outbreak 28 (pt68) Changzhi Township, PINGTUNG COUNTY Date of start of the outbreak 17/01/2015 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Iafor the International Academic Forum Introduction
    A Study of Comfort Elements Combine with Local Mascot The Case of Yunlin Townships Wen-Ying Chiu, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Taiwan Wen-Shan Chang, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Taiwan The Asian Conference on the Social Sciences 2017 Official Conference Proceedings Abstract Yunlin County, which located in south-west of Taiwan, west of the Taiwan Strait and consists of twenty townships. Due to its plain ground and fertile soil environment advantages which suits for agriculture, it has been being the main supplier of rice and vegetables, which had made a great contribution to Taiwan. Although there is an official mascot “KIMONCHAN” representing Yunlin County, there is no mascot for township individually. The mascot should contain affinity which let people feel close, harmless and being kind. The purpose of this study is looking for a method to combine those elements and to improve those to create a new harmless mascot for the townships. At the beginning of the research, the researchers will use Secondary Qualitative Study for the collection of mascot design. And analysis the color, and comfort elements, and combine the two data collection. After the completion of the data collection, researchers use focus groups to conduct interviews on design background students to get those who have Basic Aesthetics and Design Sensitivity for the mascot’s opinion and the image of Yunlin local towns. The contents of the interview after the integration of the mascot in accordance with the results of the prototype design, prototype design is complete, the use of prototype for the comfort of the in-depth interview.
    [Show full text]
  • Tackling the “Five Shortages”
    April 2018 | Vol. 48 | Issue 4 THE AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE IN TAIPEI IN OF COMMERCE CHAMBER THE AMERICAN Tackling the “Five Shortages” 應對台灣的「五缺」 TAIWAN BUSINESS TOPICS TAIWAN April 2018 | Vol. 48 | Issue 4 Vol. April 2018 | 中 華 郵 政 北 台 字 第 INDUSTRY FOCUS 3 FOOD INDUSTRY FINANCIAL SECTOR ENTREPRENEURS 5000 號 執 照 登 記 為 雜 誌 交 寄 ISSUE SPONSOR Published by the American Chamber Of NT$150 Commerce In Taipei Read TOPICS Online at topics.amcham.com.tw 4_2018_Cover 2.indd 1 2018/4/9 上午7:22 CONTENTS NEWS AND VIEWS 7 AmCham President’s Message Zooming Out in the Year of the Dog APRIL 2018 VOLUME 48, NUMBER 4 一○七年四月號 狗年退一步看更遠 9 Taiwan Briefs Publisher 發行人 By Timothy Ferry William Foreman 傅維廉 Editor-in-Chief 總編輯 12 Issues Don Shapiro 沙蕩 Collaborative Approach to Food Associate Editor 副主編 Tim Ferry 法緹姆 Safety 產官攜手迎接食安新氣象 Art Director/ 美術主任/ 6 Editorial Production Coordinator 後製統籌 By Timothy Ferry Katia Chen 陳國梅 Welcoming the Taiwan Travel Act Manager, Publications Sales & Marketing 廣告行銷經理 欣迎《台灣旅行法》 Caroline Lee 李佳紋 Translation 翻譯 Kevin Chen, Yichun Chen, Charlize Hung, Andrew Wang COVER SECTION 陳又銘, 陳宜君, 洪兆怡, 王先棠 Tackling the “Five Shortages” 應對台灣的「五缺」 American Chamber of Commerce in Taipei 129 MinSheng East Road, Section 3, 7F, Suite 706, Taipei 10596, Taiwan 14 “Five Shortages” Inhibit P.O. Box 17-277, Taipei, 10419 Taiwan Growth and Investment Tel: 2718-8226 Fax: 2718-8182 e-mail: [email protected] 「五缺」有礙投資發展 website: http://www.amcham.com.tw 名稱：台北市美國商會工商雜誌 Amid continuing concern that 發行所：台北市美國商會 the lack of sufficient land, water, 臺北市10596民生東路三段129號七樓706室 電話：2718-8226 傳真：2718-8182 power, manpower, and talent Taiwan Business Topics is a publication of the American may impact Taiwan’s economic Chamber of Commerce in Taipei, ROC.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Insured Financial Institutions （PDF）
    401 INSURED FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS 2021/5/31 39 Insured Domestic Banks 5 Sanchong City Farmers' Association of New Taipei City 62 Hengshan District Farmers' Association of Hsinchu County 1 Bank of Taiwan 13 BNP Paribas 6 Banciao City Farmers' Association of New Taipei City 63 Sinfong Township Farmers' Association of Hsinchu County 2 Land Bank of Taiwan 14 Standard Chartered Bank 7 Danshuei Township Farmers' Association of New Taipei City 64 Miaoli City Farmers' Association of Miaoli County 3 Taiwan Cooperative Bank 15 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation 8 Shulin City Farmers' Association of New Taipei City 65 Jhunan Township Farmers' Association of Miaoli County 4 First Commercial Bank 16 Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank 9 Yingge Township Farmers' Association of New Taipei City 66 Tongsiao Township Farmers' Association of Miaoli County 5 Hua Nan Commercial Bank 17 UBS AG 10 Sansia Township Farmers' Association of New Taipei City 67 Yuanli Township Farmers' Association of Miaoli County 6 Chang Hwa Commercial Bank 18 ING BANK, N. V. 11 Sinjhuang City Farmers' Association of New Taipei City 68 Houlong Township Farmers' Association of Miaoli County 7 Citibank Taiwan 19 Australia and New Zealand Bank 12 Sijhih City Farmers' Association of New Taipei City 69 Jhuolan Township Farmers' Association of Miaoli County 8 The Shanghai Commercial & Savings Bank 20 Wells Fargo Bank 13 Tucheng City Farmers' Association of New Taipei City 70 Sihu Township Farmers' Association of Miaoli County 9 Taipei Fubon Commercial Bank 21 MUFG Bank 14
    [Show full text]
  • Formosa Plastics Corporation Corporate Social Responsibility Report Contents
    2015 Formosa Plastics Corporation Corporate Social Responsibility Report Contents 01 A Message from the Management Team 1. About the Report 3. Transparent and Honest Corporate Governance 05 1.1 Overview 37 3.1 Shareholders: A Trustworthy Corporation 05 1.2 Report Guidelines for Investors 06 1.3 Report Compilation Process 45 3.2 Customers: A Corporation that Grows with Its Customers 07 1.4 Stakeholder Identication and Communication 47 3.3 Suppliers and Contractors: Creating a Business Relationship based on Mutual 09 1.5 Identication of Critical Issues Trust and Interests 13 1.6 Risk Management 14 1.7 Corporate Social Responsibility Objectives 15 1.8 CSR Achievements at a Glance 2. Company Overview 23 2.1 Company Prole 4. A Happy and Healthy Work Environment 25 2.2 Management Philosophy 26 2.3 Main Products and Market Share 53 4.1 Protection of Human Rights and Recruitment 34 2.4 Participation in External Associations 56 4.2 Rights and Welfare of Employees 34 2.5 Economic Performance 62 4.3 Human Capital Cultivation 64 4.4 A Safe and Healthy Work Environment 5. Environment Sustainability 7. Social Welfare 71 5.1 Commitment to Environmental 119 7.1 Charitable Donations Protection 121 7.2Promotion of Medical Services and Education 74 5.2 Environmental Accounting 126 7.3 Social Assistance 75 5.3 Water and Energy Conservation and Greenhouse Gas Reduction 82 5.4 Energy Conservation in the Ofce 82 5.5 Environmental Protection at the Plant 90 5.6 Product Safety and Health Responsibility Appendix 135 1. Global Reporting Initiative 146 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Participant Selection for Crowdsourcing Disaster Information
    Disaster Management and Human Health Risk III 231 Participant selection for crowdsourcing disaster information E. T.-H. Chu1, C.-Y. Lin1, P. H. Tsai2 & J. W. S. Liu3 1Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Taiwan, ROC 2Institute of Manufacturing Information and Systems, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan, ROC 3Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan, ROC Abstract Experiences with past major disasters tell us that people with wireless devices and social network services can serve effectively as mobile human sensors. A disaster warning and response system can solicit eye-witness reports from selected participants and use information provided by them to supplement surveillance sensor coverage. This paper describes a natural formulation of the participant selection problem that the system needs to solve in order to select participants from available people given their qualities as human sensors and the costs of deploying them. For this, we developed a greedy algorithm, named PSP- G, that first calculates the benefit-to-cost (B2C) factor of each participant. It then dispatches participants to regions according to participants’ B2C. We compared PSP-G with the two well-known optimization methods, BARON and BONMIN. The results show that PSP-G delivers a near optimal solution with a low time complexity. In particular, the time PSP-G needs can be merely one tenth of the execution time of the existing optimization methods, which makes PSP-G a practical solution for emergency needs in disaster areas. Keywords: crowdsourcing, social network, disaster management. 1 Introduction Despite advances in sensor technologies, disaster surveillance and response systems cannot always rely solely on sensors and sensor networks/systems for surveillance data to acquire situation awareness and support decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Anopheline Mosquitoes of Taiwan: Annotated Catalog and Bibliography1
    Pacific Insects 4 (3) : 615-649 October 10, 1962 NON-ANOPHELINE MOSQUITOES OF TAIWAN: ANNOTATED CATALOG AND BIBLIOGRAPHY1 By J. C. Lien TAIWAN PROVINCIAL MALARIA RESEARCH INSTITUTE2 INTRODUCTION The studies of the mosquitoes of Taiwan were initiated as early as 1901 or even earlier by several pioneer workers, i. e. K. Kinoshita, J. Hatori, F. V. Theobald, J. Tsuzuki and so on, and have subsequently been carried out by them and many other workers. Most of the workers laid much more emphasis on anopheline than on non-anopheline mosquitoes, because the former had direct bearing on the transmission of the most dreaded disease, malaria, in Taiwan. Owing to their efforts, the taxonomic problems of the Anopheles mos­ quitoes of Taiwan are now well settled, and their local distribution and some aspects of their habits well understood. However, there still remains much work to be done on the non-anopheline mosquitoes of Taiwan. Nowadays, malaria is being so successfully brought down to near-eradication in Taiwan that public health workers as well as the general pub­ lic are starting to give their attention to the control of other mosquito-borne diseases such as filariasis and Japanese B encephalitis, and the elimination of mosquito nuisance. Ac­ cordingly extensive studies of the non-anopheline mosquitoes of Taiwan now become very necessary and important. Morishita and Okada (1955) published a reference catalogue of the local non-anophe­ line mosquitoes. However the catalog compiled by them in 1955 was based on informa­ tion obtained before 1945. They listed 34 species, but now it becomes clear that 4 of them are respectively synonyms of 4 species among the remaining 30.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to the Central Bank of China
    401 INSURED FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS 2021/6/30 39 Insured Domestic Banks 5 Sanchong City Farmers' Association of New Taipei City 62 Hengshan District Farmers' Association of Hsinchu County 1 Bank of Taiwan 13 BNP Paribas 6 Banciao City Farmers' Association of New Taipei City 63 Sinfong Township Farmers' Association of Hsinchu County 2 Land Bank of Taiwan 14 Standard Chartered Bank 7 Danshuei Township Farmers' Association of New Taipei City 64 Miaoli City Farmers' Association of Miaoli County 3 Taiwan Cooperative Bank 15 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation 8 Shulin City Farmers' Association of New Taipei City 65 Jhunan Township Farmers' Association of Miaoli County 4 First Commercial Bank 16 Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank 9 Yingge Township Farmers' Association of New Taipei City 66 Tongsiao Township Farmers' Association of Miaoli County 5 Hua Nan Commercial Bank 17 UBS AG 10 Sansia Township Farmers' Association of New Taipei City 67 Yuanli Township Farmers' Association of Miaoli County 6 Chang Hwa Commercial Bank 18 ING BANK, N. V. 11 Sinjhuang City Farmers' Association of New Taipei City 68 Houlong Township Farmers' Association of Miaoli County 7 Citibank Taiwan 19 Australia and New Zealand Bank 12 Sijhih City Farmers' Association of New Taipei City 69 Jhuolan Township Farmers' Association of Miaoli County 8 The Shanghai Commercial & Savings Bank 20 Wells Fargo Bank 13 Tucheng City Farmers' Association of New Taipei City 70 Sihu Township Farmers' Association of Miaoli County 9 Taipei Fubon Commercial Bank 21 MUFG Bank 14
    [Show full text]
  • Taipower Greennet
    1 Reporting Principles This is the tenth issue of the annual Sustainability Report published by Taiwan Power Company (Taipower). This year, the statistics and disclosures in the report have been compiled in accordance with the “Core” option of the G4 Guidelines of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). This report has been verified by the British Standards Institution (BSI) Taiwan to ensure that the report meets the requirements of the Core Option of the GRI G4 Guidelines and the GRI Electric Utilities Sector Disclosures, as well as the accountability principle standards (APS) in AA1000 (Type I Moderate Level). The contents featured in this Sustainability Report have been compiled from data submitted by relevant units of Taipower. To ensure the accuracy of report and meet stakeholders’ expectations, each year, an editorial meeting is held upon the completion of the report’s initial draft for all data-submitting units to review the contents of the report and provide feedback on the report. All contents of the report must be approved by the corresponding supervisor, the President and Chairman before publication. Following the last report of “Change for Power”, Taipower’s 2016 Sustainability Report will adopt “A Powerful New Age” as its main structure to further demonstrate Taipower’s efforts and effects of organizational transformation in 2015, showing how Taipower’s new mission and vision have guided the company in the process of organizational transformation to make Taipower’s endeavor of being sustainability visible in public. █ Period Covered by the Report From January 1 to December 31, 2015 (For the sake of complete disclosure and comparability, the report also includes some historical data.) █ Scope of the Report This report covers Taipower’s data and information regarding sustainability issues and achievements within the areas of economic management, social responsibility and environmental sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Important Performance
    Annual Important Performance Item Unit 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1.Capacity of Water Supply System M3/Day … … … … … … 2.Capacity of Water-Purification-Station M3/Day 1,552,559 1,802,000 2,439,390 2,731,112 2,921,834 3,187,036 3.Average Yield Per Day M3 1,176,321 1,265,741 1,332,205 1,513,115 1,791,415 1,996,937 4.Average Water Distributed Per Day M3 1,159,958 1,251,325 1,329,623 1,509,732 1,786,097 1,993,547 5.Average Water Sold Per Day M3 791,814 833,840 906,641 1,053,783 1,294,756 1,493,036 6.Yield M3 429,357,104 461,995,434 487,586,996 552,286,833 653,866,592 728,881,919 7.Distributed Water M3 423,384,502 456,733,547 486,641,970 551,052,131 651,925,230 727,644,563 8.Water Sold M3 289,012,366 304,351,457 331,830,538 384,630,881 472,585,950 544,957,993 9.Actual Meter-Readings M3 … … 325,943,007 366,487,228 447,447,054 508,369,477 10.Percentage of Water Sold ％ 68.26 66.64 68.19 69.80 72.49 74.89 11.Percentage of Actual Meter Readings ％ … … 66.98 66.51 68.63 69.87 12.Administrative Population Person 13,212,945 13,431,137 13,688,930 13,908,275 14,127,946 14,376,247 13.Designed Population Person 6,248,858 6,780,700 7,616,810 8,300,890 8,927,215 9,503,965 14.
    [Show full text]
  • The Re-Emergence and Emergence of Vector-Borne Rickettsioses in Taiwan
    Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease Review The Re-Emergence and Emergence of Vector-Borne Rickettsioses in Taiwan Nicholas T. Minahan 1, Chien-Chung Chao 2 and Kun-Hsien Tsai 1,3,* ID 1 Institute of Environmental Health, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, No. 17, Xu-Zhou Road, Taipei 100, Taiwan; [email protected] 2 Viral and Rickettsial Diseases Department, Infectious Diseases Directorate, Naval Medical Research Center, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Public Health, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, No. 17, Xu-Zhou Road, Taipei 100, Taiwan * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +886-2-3366-8103 Received: 30 November 2017; Accepted: 19 December 2017; Published: 21 December 2017 Abstract: Rickettsial diseases, particularly vector-borne rickettsioses (VBR), have a long history in Taiwan, with studies on scrub typhus and murine typhus dating back over a century. The climatic and geographic diversity of Taiwan’s main island and its offshore islands provide many ecological niches for the diversification and maintenance of rickettsiae alike. In recent decades, scrub typhus has re-emerged as the most prevalent type of rickettsiosis in Taiwan, particularly in eastern Taiwan and its offshore islands. While murine typhus has also re-emerged on Taiwan’s western coast, it remains neglected. Perhaps more alarming than the re-emergence of these rickettsioses is the emergence of newly described VBR. The first case of human infection with Rickettsia felis was confirmed in 2005, and undetermined spotted fever group rickettsioses have recently been detected. Taiwan is at a unique advantage in terms of detecting and characterizing VBR, as it has universal health coverage and a national communicable disease surveillance system; however, these systems have not been fully utilized for this purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Taiwan's Remote Areas
    Taiwan's Remote Areas County city Other country Wanli Dist.、Jinshan Dist. 、Shiding Dist. 、Pingxi Dist. 、Shuangxi Dist. 、Gongliao New Taipei City Dist. 、Pinglin Dist. 、Wulai Dist. 、Sanzhi Dist. 、Shimen Dist. 、Ruifang Dist. Taoyuan County Fuxing Dist. Baoshan Township、Guanxi Township、Wufeng Township、Hengshan Township、Jianshi Hsinchu County Township、Beipu Township、Emei Township Nanzhuang Township、Shitan Township、Dahu Township、Taian Township、Zhuolan Miaoli County Township Taichung City Fengyuan Dist. 、Heping Dist. 、Xinshe Dist. Changhua County Xizhou Township、Zhutang Township、Erlin Township、Dacheng Township Zhongliao Township、Guoxing Township、Renai Township、Jiji Township、Shuili Nantou County Township、YuchiTownship、Xinyi Township、Lugu Township Fanlu Township、Meishan Township、Alishan Township、Dapu Township、Dongshi Chiayi County Township、Xikou Township、Yizhu Township、Budai Township Baozhong Township、Dongshi Township、Taixi Township、Mailiao Township、Shuilin Yunlin County Township、Kouhu Township、Sihu Township、Yuanchang Township Zuozhen Dist.、Yujing Dist.、Nanxi Dist.、Nanhua Dist. 、Longqi Dist. 、Qigu Dist. 、 Tainan City Jiangjun Dist. 、Beimen Dist. 、Baihe Dist. 、Dongshan Dist. 、Danei Dist. Tianliao Dist.、Liugui Dist. 、Neimen Dist. 、Shanlin Dist. 、Jiaxian Dist. 、Taoyuan Kaohsiung City Dist. 、Namaxia Dist. 、Maolin Dist. Sandimen Township、Wutai Township、Majia Township、Jiuru Township、Ligang Township、Gaoshu Township、Yanpu Township、Linluo Township、Zhutian Township、 Taiwu Township、Laiyi Township、Wanluan Township、Kanding Township、Xinpi Pingtung County Township、Nanzhou
    [Show full text]
  • Wet Deposition of PCDD/Fs in Taiwan
    Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 18: 2600–2611, 2018 Copyright © Taiwan Association for Aerosol Research ISSN: 1680-8584 print / 2071-1409 online doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2018.07.0270 Wet Deposition of PCDD/Fs in Taiwan Yen-Yi Lee1, Wen-Che Hou1*, Jinning Zhu2*, Weiwei Wang2* 1 Department of Environmental Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan 2 School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 246011, China ABSTRACT In 2017, the seasonal variations in the wet deposition fluxes of total-PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ in ambient air were evaluated in Taiwan. The results showed the annual wet deposition fluxes of total-PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ to be –2 –1 –2 42.5 pg WHO2005-TEQ m month , and the seasonal distributions were 53.3, 62.9, 26.7 and 27.1 pg WHO2005-TEQ m –1 month in spring, summer, autumn and winter, respectively. The average Stot of total-PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ was 12300. There were obvious seasonal variations in Stot, for which the values were 13840, 6540, 8280 and 20540 in spring, summer, autumn, and winter, respectively. The average concentration of total-PCDD/Fs-WHO2005-TEQ in the rain were –1 0.453, 0.176, 0.218 and 0.649 pg WHO2005-TEQ L in spring, summer, autumn and winter, respectively. Atmospheric deposition is the major removal pathway for PCDD/Fs. The results of this study provide an evaluation of the adverse effects of PCDD/Fs exposure on human health, and provide a reason for the government to be concerned and to enact better control on air pollution.
    [Show full text]