The Incidence of Xyloporosis (Cachexia) in Certain Florida Citrus Varieties

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Incidence of Xyloporosis (Cachexia) in Certain Florida Citrus Varieties CHILDS ET AL: XYLOPOROSIS 77 to several dozen. These efforts that are con species is as great, or greater, than that paid tinuing over the years must be fruitful as they for organic miticide to control another mite. have in the past. In fact, after the adjustment And sulfur also brings on other biological has been made to the Miller Pesticide Residue complications because of its plant and soil Amendment, I think it very probable that the residue problems. > production of new chemicals as miticides From a study of the new publications on will again appear as frequently, or even more the biological and ecological factors surround frequently, than before. ing mite control, and through discussions with We know that pesticides sometimes fail with the specialists in this area, it seems that the out evident reasons. Sometimes it takes a effectiveness of miticides often has been al long time to discover these reasons. That may tered considerably by changing environmental be the case in Florida with miticides. It may factors to the point where failure has follow be a long, step-wise study over several years, ed. A great deal of study is going on in this to discover how to use present miticides alone, area and as more knowledge becomes available, or in combination. On the other hand, because it seems certain that the present miticides of favorable weather and other ecological con can be used alone, or in combinations, more ditions for mites in Florida, it may be this effectively, and the known ones in process same difficult situation may develop later on of development will find their places in the and more slowly in other areas. scheme of mite control more readily. As you can understand from the foregoing We all recognize'also, I think, that the new in the developing of a new miticide, the organic miticides are actually a great improve cooperation of independent companies, experi ment over the inorganic ones, even though ment stations, growers, and many other they are not as yet perfect, nor have we agencies is necessary. We can, therefore, ex learned how to use them with the greatest pect the same continued progress that has efficiency. On a basis of cost per £bund prevailed during the last decade, with only the new miticides are expensive. But com a temporary slow-up in order to become ad paring their cost with that of sulfur for the justed to the new laws and regulations fol control of the citrus rust mite, the actual in lowing the enactment of the Miller Pesticide vestment in sulfur for the control of this one Residue Amendment. THE INCIDENCE OF XYLOPOROSIS (CACHEXIA) IN CERTAIN FLORIDA CITRUS VARIETIES J. F. L. Childs1, G. R. Grimm2, T. J. Grant3, certification nursery, and from observations on 6 L. C. Knorr4, and G. Norman5 parent trees in the Certification Program, all Introduction of which attest to the high incidence of xylo porosis infection in Florida citrus. The re Evidence of the widespread occurrence of sults are discussed in relation to budwood the causal agent of xyloporosis (cachexia) in certification. Florida citrus trees is presented herein. In order that the disease, its cause, and range The causal agent of xyloporosis, a disease of in symptoms be understood, a brief review citrus trees on sweet lime (Citrus aurantifolia) is given of significant facts previously estab rootstock first described in 1934 in Palestine lished. This is followed by presentation of (12), is believed to be identical with the data obtained from general field observations causal agent of cachexia, a disease of Orlando on bud union disorders, from observations on tangelo first described in Florida in 1950 (I). Orlando tangelo test plants in the budwood The identity is indicated by the following considerations: Xyloporosis is characterized by V, a/» and V—Pathologists, Horticultural Crops Re search Branch, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. degeneration of the phloem and xylem of sweet Department of Agriculture, Orlando, Florida. _ V—Pathologist, Florida Citrus Experiment Station, lime rootstock and subsequent deterioration Lake Alfred. Fla. of the citrus scion top. On the basis of these «iB/7TIno char*e °* Budwood Certification Program, Florida State Plant Board, Winter Haven, Fla. symptoms xyloporosis was recognized in Brazil 78 FLORIDA STATE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY, 1955 (6) in 1937 and in Florida (5) in 1951. This budded with many different varieties of citrus*. disease was at first attributed to physiological In recent tests, xyloporosis was transmitted to factors although a virus relationship was con Orlando tangelo test trees from 25 previously sidered possible (12). Incompatibility between unreported varieties (6 species) of citrus. stock and scion was later suggested (9). Thus the extent to which xyloporosis virus is Examinations made in experimental root- distributed in commercial sweet orange and stock plantings in Florida (2) and in Texas grapefruit varieties is becoming apparent. (10) disclosed that 25 varieties including Surveys of citrus orchards in Argentina mandarins, (C. reticulata), mandarin hybrids, (4, 8) and Florida (7) carried out independ kumquats (Fortunelh sp.), and kumquat ently by some of the authors revealed that hybrids, when used as rootstocks, were sus certain bud-union abnormalities were frequent ceptible to cachexia. Cachexia has been dem ly observed on sweet lime, Everbearing lemon, onstrated to be bud transmissible (2, 3, 11). and Rough lemon rootstocks. The similarity In a previous report a possible indirect rela of these abnormalities to the symptoms of tionship to psorosis virus was discussed (2), xyloporosis in Orlando tangelo prompted an but further work indicated that none existed. examination of the orchard trees that were That the causal agent of cachexia is a separate candidates for registration as sources of bud- entity is also shown by Olson's report that it wood in the Budwood Certification Program, was transmitted with buds from trees tested in relation to the Orlando test trees in the and certified as free of psorosis (11). nursery where xyloporosis symptoms had been Similarity of the phloem and xylem symp noted. toms of cachexia on Orlando tangelo to those Phloem discoloration in Rough lemon root of xyloporosis on sweet lime rootstock has been stocks suggesting xyloporosis infection was first pointed out (2). Transmission of xyloporosis noted in Florida in 1953. In addition to show virus from sweet lime to Orlando tangelo and ing phloem discoloration, Rough lemon usually of cachexia virus from Orlando tangelo to exhibits other symptoms consisting of a nar sweet lime indicates that in Florida both row constriction or indentation of the wood diseases are probably caused by the same beneath the bark at the bud union and mild agent (3). The name xyloporosis has priority pitting of the Rough lemon wood (Fig. 1). and consequently will be used hereafter in There is a corresponding ridge in the cambial this paper. It is known that the xyloporosis * Suit, R. P., E. P. DuCharme, and I*. C. Knorr. virus causes severe and extensive phloem Citrus Experiment Station, Lake Alfred, Florida, un symptoms in Orlando tangelo, but it may be published data. present in sweet orange (C. sinensis), grape fruit (C. paradisi), and certain other species without causing any recognized symptoms (2). Citrus varieties differ in the time re quired to express disease symptoms. Satsuma mandarin (C. reticulata) rootstocks, for ex ample, required 2 years longer than Orlando tangelo to show symptoms (10). Although there is considerable variation in the severity of symptom expression in different varieties, this was not emphasized in previous publica tions. Distribution of Xyloporosis It has been suspected for some time that xyloporosis virus is widely distributed without causing symptoms in the commercial varieties of sweet orange and grapefruit in Florida and Texas (5, 11). In fact, xyloporosis symptoms have been observed in sweet lime and Ever Fig. 1. Constricted bud union of sweet orange (C. sinensis) on Rough lemon (C. limon.) infected with bearing lemon (C. limon) rootstock when xyloporosis. CHILDS ET AL: XYLOPOROSIS 79 face of the bark at which point phloem dis union symptoms with the evidence of xyloporo coloration is most pronounced and occasional sis infection as demonstrated in the nursery ly slight separation of the outer bark tissues test. Of the total trees, 262 were sweet orange occurs at the line of the bud union. To date, these symptoms have been confined almost or grapefruit trees on Rough lemon or sour entirely to Rough lemon rootstock budded orange (C. aurantium) rootstocks. The results with sweet orange scions (7). of these examinations are as follows: Sweet orange on Rough lemon rootstock: Of Examination of Nursery Test Trees 97 candidate sweet orange trees (5 varieties) Each candidate tree in the Budwood Pro on Rough lemon rootstock, 53 percent ex gram is budded on 3 Orlando tangelo seed hibited bud union symptoms in the parent trees lings to test for xyloporosis virus which may and also induced typical symptoms of xyloporo be present without causing symptoms in the sis in the Orlando tangelo test trees in the candidate tree. Many of these seedlings have nursery. Seven percent of the parent trees been budded 2 to 2& years, long enough for expressed no bud union symptoms but induced some to express symptoms; and it was round, symptoms on the Orlando tangelo test root upon examination, that 62 percent of the can stocks. Twenty-six percent of the parent trees didate trees had transmitted xyloporosis to the that exhibited bud union symptoms are nega Orlando tangelo rootstocks. In a few cases, tive to date by the Orlando tangelo test in the only one of the 3 Orlando tangelo replicates nursery. Failure of some Orlando test trees (budded from each candidate tree) had to show symptoms when budded from parent developed typical symptoms but, in the light trees that are undoubtedly affected by xylo of previous experience, that is considered suf porosis is probably due to the fact that not all ficient evidence that the parent tree is in Orlando tangelo test trees will show symptoms fected.
Recommended publications
  • Kettleman City, Kings County Please Read Immediately
    CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE OFFICIAL NOTICE FOR CITY OF KETTLEMAN CITY, KINGS COUNTY PLEASE READ IMMEDIATELY THE NOTICE OF TREATMENT FOR THE ASIAN CITRUS PSYLLID On September 18, 2020 the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) confirmed the presence of Asian citrus psyllid (ACP), Diaphorina citri Kuwayama, a harmful exotic pest in the city of Kettleman City, Kings County. This detection indicate that a breeding population exists in the area. The devastating citrus disease Huanglongbing (HLB) is spread by the feeding action of ACP. The ACP infestation is sufficiently isolated and localized to be amenable to the CDFA’s ACP treatment work plan. A Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) has been certified which analyzes the ACP treatment program in accordance with Public Resources Code, Sections 21000 et seq. The PEIR is available at http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/plant/peir/. The treatment activities described below are consistent with the PEIR. In accordance with integrated pest management principles, CDFA has evaluated possible treatment methods and determined that there are no physical, cultural, or biological control methods available to eliminate the ACP from this area. Notice of Treatment is valid until September 18, 2021, which is the amount of time necessary to determine that the treatment was successful. The treatment plan for the ACP infestation will be implemented within a 50-meter radius of each detection site, as follows: • Tempo® SC Ultra (cyfluthrin), a contact insecticide for controlling the adults and nymphs of ACP, will be applied from the ground using hydraulic spray equipment to the foliage of host plants; and • Merit® 2F or CoreTect™ (imidacloprid), a systemic insecticide for controlling the immature life stages of ACP, will be applied to the soil underneath host plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperatives in the U.S.-Citrus Industry
    Agriculture Cooperatives in the Rural Business and Cooperative Development U.S.-Citrus Industry Service RBCDS Research Report 137 Abstract Cooperatives in the U.S. Citrus Industry James A. Jacobs Agricultural Economist U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Business and Cooperative Development Service Citrus is one of the leading fruit crops produced in the United States. Cooperatives play an important role in the handling and marketing of both fresh and processed citrus products. This report examines the development and posi- tion of cooperatives in the citrus industry, their functions and operating prac- tices, and the impact of changes in production practices and industry structure on cooperatives. Cooperatives range from small, local fresh packinghouse associations to large cooperative federations with comprehensive marketing and sales pro- grams in both fresh and processed markets. Cooperatives are among the lead- ing marketers in all producing areas, and are the dominant marketing organiza- tion in California and Arizona. Citrus cooperatives use the pooling method to market and allocate returns. This cooperative practice of averaging price and sharing risk is commonly used by some private citrus firms as well, reflecting the inherent volatility of citrus production. Keywords: Cooperative, grove, grower-member, fresh citrus, processed citrus, frozen-concentrated orange juice, packinghouse, processor, marketing federa- tion, sales agency, marketing agreement, pooling, grove care, freezes, box, eliminations. RBCDS Research Report 137 December 1994 Preface This report describes the position and functions of cooperatives in the U.S. citrus industry. It is the first known detailed examination of its kind on citrus cooperative activities and operating practices. The report is intended as a reference for cooperative managers and mem- bers, professional advisors, and anyone involved in professional activities or research in the citrus industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Phenolic Compounds Produced in Citrus
    USDA ??:-Z7 S rveyof Phenolic United States Department of Agriculture C mpounds Produced IliIIiI Agricultural Research In Citrus Service Technical Bulletin Number 1856 December 1998 United States Department of Agriculture Survey of Phenolic Compounds Agricultural Produced in Citrus Research Service Mark Berhow, Brent Tisserat, Katherine Kanes, and Carl Vandercook Technical Bulletin Number 1856 December 1998 This research project was conducted at USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Fruit and Vegetable Chem­ istry laboratory, Pasadena, California, where Berhow was a research chemist, TIsserat was a research geneticist, Kanes was a research associate, and Vandercook, now retired, was a research chemist. Berhow and Tisserat now work at the USDA-ARS National Center for AgriCUltural Utilization Research, Peoria, Illinois, where Berhow is a research chemist and Tisserat is a research geneticist. Abstract Berhow, M., B. Tisserat, K. Kanes, and C. Vandercook. 1998. Survey of Mention of trade names or companies in this publication is solely for the Phenolic Compounds Produced in Citrus. U.S. Department ofAgriculture, purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommenda­ Agricultural Research Service, Technical Bulletin No. 1856, 158 pp. tion or endorsement by the U. S. Department ofAgriculture over others not mentioned. A survey of phenolic compounds, especially flavanones and flavone and flavonol compounds, using high pressure liquid chromatography was While supplies last, single copies of this publication may be obtained at no performed in Rutaceae, subfamily Aurantioideae, representing 5 genera, cost from- 35 species, and 114 cultivars. The average number of peaks, or phenolic USDA, ARS, National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research compounds, occurring in citrus leaf, flavedo, albedo, and juice vesicles 1815 North University Street were 21, 17, 15, and 9.3, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Generation of Sexual and Somatic Hybrids in Acid Citrus Fruits
    GENERATION OF SEXUAL AND SOMATIC HYBRIDS IN ACID CITRUS FRUITS By ZENAIDA JOSEFINA VILORIA VILLALOBOS A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2003 Copyright 2003 by Zenaida Josefina Viloria Villalobos This dissertation is dedicated to my darling mother Olivia and to the memory of my beloved father Dimas, and to my sisters Celina, Doris, Celmira, and Olivia, and brothers Dimas, Silfredo and Alejandro, with love. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was completed with the generous collaboration of many people to whom I will always be grateful. First I wish to thank my supervisor Dr. Jude Grosser, for his guidance, suggestions, and financial assistance during the last period of my studies. I also want to thank the University of Zulia and Fondo Nacional de Ciencias, Tecnologia e Innovation for giving me the opportunity to do my doctoral studies. I thank very much Dr. Renee Goodrich, Dr. Frederick Gmitter, Dr. Michael Kane and Dr. Dennis Gray for being members of my committee and for their contributions to this work. Thanks go to Dr. Glem Wright (University of Arizona) for making it possible to generate more lemon progenies in this study. I appreciate very much the supervision and help in completing the canker screening study from Dr. Graham, Diana Drouillard and Diane Bright. I thank very much Dr. Ramon Littell and Belkys Bracho for their assistance on the statistical analysis of my experiments. Thanks go to the Division of Plant Industry (Lake Alfred, FL), particularly to Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Citrus Industry Biosecurity Plan 2015
    Industry Biosecurity Plan for the Citrus Industry Version 3.0 July 2015 PLANT HEALTH AUSTRALIA | Citrus Industry Biosecurity Plan 2015 Location: Level 1 1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6215 7700 Fax: +61 2 6260 4321 E-mail: [email protected] Visit our web site: www.planthealthaustralia.com.au An electronic copy of this plan is available through the email address listed above. © Plant Health Australia Limited 2004 Copyright in this publication is owned by Plant Health Australia Limited, except when content has been provided by other contributors, in which case copyright may be owned by another person. With the exception of any material protected by a trade mark, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivs 3.0 Australia licence. Any use of this publication, other than as authorised under this licence or copyright law, is prohibited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ - This details the relevant licence conditions, including the full legal code. This licence allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to Plant Health Australia (as below). In referencing this document, the preferred citation is: Plant Health Australia Ltd (2004) Industry Biosecurity Plan for the Citrus Industry (Version 3.0 – July 2015). Plant Health Australia, Canberra, ACT. Disclaimer: The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only. It is not intended as professional advice on any particular matter. No person should act or fail to act on the basis of any material contained in this publication without first obtaining specific and independent professional advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Joimalofagmoiltdraiesea
    JOIMALOFAGMOILTDRAIESEARCH VOL. XIX WASHINGTON, D. C, JULY 15, 1920 No. 8 RELATIVE SUSCEPTIBILITY TO CITRUS-CANKER OF DIFFERENT SPECIES AND HYBRIDS OF THE GENUS CITRUS, INCLUDING THE WILD RELATIVES » By GEORGE I*. PELTIER, Plant Pathologist, Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, and Agent, Bureau of Plant Industry, United States Department of Agriculture, and WILLIAM J. FREDERICH, Assistant Pathologist, Bureau of Plant Industry, United States Department of Agriculture 2 INTRODUCTION In a preliminary report (6)3 the senior author briefly described the results obtained under greenhouse conditions for a period of six months on the susceptibility and resistance to citrus-canker of a number of plants including some of the wild relatives, Citrus fruits, and hybrids of the genus Citrus. Since that time the plants reported on have been under close observation; a third experiment has been started, and many inoculations have been made in the isolation field in southern Alabama during the summers of 1917, 1918, and 1919. Many more plants have been successfully inoculated; others have proved to be extremely sus- ceptible; while some of those tested still show considerable resistance. The results obtained up to November 1, 1919, are described in tjhis report. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS In the greenhouse, the methods used and the conditions governing the inoculations described in the preliminary report were closely fol- lowed. The same strain of the organism was used and was applied in the 1 Published with the approval of the Director of the Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station. The paper is based upon cooperative investigations between the Office of Crop Physiology and Breeding Investi- gations, Bureau of Plant Industry, United States Department of Agriculture, and the Department of Plant Pathology, Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Holdings of the University of California Citrus Variety Collection 41
    Holdings of the University of California Citrus Variety Collection Category Other identifiers CRC VI PI numbera Accession name or descriptionb numberc numberd Sourcee Datef 1. Citron and hybrid 0138-A Indian citron (ops) 539413 India 1912 0138-B Indian citron (ops) 539414 India 1912 0294 Ponderosa “lemon” (probable Citron ´ lemon hybrid) 409 539491 Fawcett’s #127, Florida collection 1914 0648 Orange-citron-hybrid 539238 Mr. Flippen, between Fullerton and Placentia CA 1915 0661 Indian sour citron (ops) (Zamburi) 31981 USDA, Chico Garden 1915 1795 Corsican citron 539415 W.T. Swingle, USDA 1924 2456 Citron or citron hybrid 539416 From CPB 1930 (Came in as Djerok which is Dutch word for “citrus” 2847 Yemen citron 105957 Bureau of Plant Introduction 3055 Bengal citron (ops) (citron hybrid?) 539417 Ed Pollock, NSW, Australia 1954 3174 Unnamed citron 230626 H. Chapot, Rabat, Morocco 1955 3190 Dabbe (ops) 539418 H. Chapot, Rabat, Morocco 1959 3241 Citrus megaloxycarpa (ops) (Bor-tenga) (hybrid) 539446 Fruit Research Station, Burnihat Assam, India 1957 3487 Kulu “lemon” (ops) 539207 A.G. Norman, Botanical Garden, Ann Arbor MI 1963 3518 Citron of Commerce (ops) 539419 John Carpenter, USDCS, Indio CA 1966 3519 Citron of Commerce (ops) 539420 John Carpenter, USDCS, Indio CA 1966 3520 Corsican citron (ops) 539421 John Carpenter, USDCS, Indio CA 1966 3521 Corsican citron (ops) 539422 John Carpenter, USDCS, Indio CA 1966 3522 Diamante citron (ops) 539423 John Carpenter, USDCS, Indio CA 1966 3523 Diamante citron (ops) 539424 John Carpenter, USDCS, Indio
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Citrus Brightens Cold Weather Gloom
    By Frieda’s Specialty Produce CEO Karen Caplan What better way to enliven the spirit during the winter months than with the bright colors, refreshing fragrance, and sweet taste of fresh citrus fruit. Not a lot of people associate citrus fruit with winter because it seems to be available year round, but, in fact, the winter months are when citrus fruits are at their sweetest. Florida produced 63% of the total U.S. citrus crop in 2012 with California coming in at 34%, and Texas and Arizona rounding out the last 3%. Florida is the largest grower of oranges at 70% of total U.S. production and grapefruit at 65%, while California is the largest producer of lemons at 92% and tangerines at 80%. Did you know that Americans consume more citrus per person than any other fruit? The bulk of this is attributable to orange juice, but the fresh citrus category is still among the top sellers in the industry. Our top selling citrus at Frieda’s include Oroblanco, Meyer lemons,blood oranges, A pomelo-grapefruit cross, the Oroblanco can brighten up a range of dishes. UGLI® (Uniq) fruit, and kumquats. Most of our citrus come from California, but our UGLI® (Uniq) fruit are only grown in Jamaica. We also extend our Meyer lemon season by sourcing from New Zealand and our blood oranges by importing them from Australia and Italy. Meaning "white gold" in Spanish, the Oroblanco was developed in 1958 and is a cross between a white grapefruit and a pomelo, the giant Chinese citrus. The fruit has yellow skin, a thick rind, and is virtually seedless.
    [Show full text]
  • Improvement of Subtropical Fruit Crops: Citrus
    IMPROVEMENT OF SUBTROPICAL FRUIT CROPS: CITRUS HAMILTON P. ÏRAUB, Senior Iloriiciilturist T. RALPH ROBCNSON, Senior Physiolo- gist Division of Frnil and Vegetable Crops and Diseases, Bureau of Plant Tndusiry MORE than half of the 13 fruit crops known to have been cultivated longer than 4,000 years,according to the researches of DeCandolle (7)\ are tropical and subtropical fruits—mango, oliv^e, fig, date, banana, jujube, and pomegranate. The citrus fruits as a group, the lychee, and the persimmon have been cultivated for thousands of years in the Orient; the avocado and papaya were important food crops in the American Tropics and subtropics long before the discovery of the New World. Other types, such as the pineapple, granadilla, cherimoya, jaboticaba, etc., are of more recent introduction, and some of these have not received the attention of the plant breeder to any appreciable extent. Through the centuries preceding recorded history and up to recent times, progress in the improvement of most subtropical fruits was accomplished by the trial-error method, which is crude and usually expensive if measured by modern standards. With the general accept- ance of the Mendelian principles of heredity—unit characters, domi- nance, and segregation—early in the twentieth century a starting point was provided for the development of a truly modern science of genetics. In this article it is the purpose to consider how subtropical citrus fruit crops have been improved, are now being improved, or are likel3^ to be improved by scientific breeding. Each of the more important crops will be considered more or less in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Citrus Psyllid Control Program in the Continental United States
    United States Department of Agriculture Asian Citrus Psyllid Marketing and Regulatory Control Program in the Programs Animal and Continental Plant Health Inspection Service United States and Puerto Rico Environmental Assessment August 2010 Asian Citrus Psyllid Control Program in the Continental United States and Puerto Rico Environmental Assessment August 2010 Agency Contact: Osama El-Lissy Director, Emergency Management Emergency and Domestic Programs Animal Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 4700 River Rd. Unit 134 Riverdale, MD 20737 __________________________________________________________ The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’S TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326–W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250–9410 or call (202) 720–5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. __________________________________________________________ Mention of companies or commercial products in this report does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture over others not mentioned. USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of any product mentioned. Product names are mentioned solely to report factually on available data and to provide specific information. __________________________________________________________ This publication reports research involving pesticides. All uses of pesticides must be registered by appropriate State and/or Federal agencies before they can be recommended.
    [Show full text]
  • AUSTRALIAN CITRUS TREE CENSUS 2014 Survey Scope 1,750 Businesses Contacted 1,064 Businesses in Report*
    AUSTRALIAN CITRUS TREE CENSUS 2014 Survey Scope 1,750 businesses contacted 1,064 businesses in report* *It is estimated that an additional 2,500 hectares are not represented in this report. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following personnel and agencies are INTRODUCTION acknowledged for their input and assistance in collecting data for the 2014 Citrus Tree Census. New South Wales Department of Primary Industries The Australian citrus industry is one of Australia’s largest Andrew Creek, Development Officer – Citrus horticulture industries, with commercial production in five States Tammy Galvin, Senior Land Services Officer (Projects) and one territory. Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia It is one of Australia’s largest fresh produce exporters, exporting on average 160,000 tonnes Bronwyn Walsh, Value Chain Coordinator – Citrus per year, over the last ten years. While the industry’s size and output is significant in Australia, it comprises less than 0.5% of global production and is one of the highest cost producers in the Citrus Australia South Australia Region world, relying on its reputation for quality and safety to command premium prices in high paying Mark Doecke, Committee Member export markets. Anthony Fulwood, Committee Member The Citrus Tree Census is an online database developed by Citrus Australia to collect national Penny Smith Committee Member production statistics about variety, rootstock, tree age and hectares planted. This information is essential for: This project has been funded by Horticulture Innovation Australia Limited using the citrus industry levy and funds • Guiding growers when choosing which varieties to plant from the Australian Government. • Assisting the citrus supply chain with packing and logistics investment decisions and • Directing market development and research and development needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Physiology of Citrus Fruiting
    REVIEW Physiology of citrus fruiting Domingo J. Iglesias, Manuel Cercós, José M. Colmenero-Flores, Miguel A. Naranjo, Gabino Ríos, Esther Carrera, Omar Ruiz-Rivero, Ignacio Lliso, Raphael Morillon1, Francisco R. Tadeo and Manuel Talon* Centro de Genómica, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Apdo. Oficial, 46113 Moncada, Valencia, Spain. 1Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Dévelopement (CIRAD), San Giuliano (Corse), F-20230, France. *Corresponding author: [email protected] Received: 31 October 2007; Accepted: 02 November 2007 Citrus is the main fruit tree crop in the world and therefore has a tremendous economical, social and cultural impact in our society. In recent years, our knowledge on plant reproductive biology has increased considerably mostly because of the work developed in model plants. However, the information generated in these species cannot always be applied to citrus, predominantly because citrus is a perennial tree crop that exhibits a very peculiar and unusual reproductive biology. Regulation of fruit growth and development in citrus is an intricate phenomenon depending upon many internal and external factors that may operate both sequentially and simultaneously. The elements and mechanisms whereby endogenous and environmental stimuli affect fruit growth are being interpreted and this knowledge may help to provide tools that allow optimizing production and fruit with enhanced nutritional value, the ultimate goal of the Citrus Industry. This article will review the progress that has taken place in the physiology of citrus fruiting during recent years and present the current status of major research topics in this area. Key words: abiotic stresses, abscission, color break, flowering, fruit set, ripening Fisiologia da frutificação em citrus.
    [Show full text]