Downtown Minneapolis System
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Regional Transit Technical Advisory Committee October 29, 2014 Full
MEETING OF THE REGIONAL TRANSIT TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Wednesday, October 29, 2014 10:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. SCAG Los Angeles Main Office 818 W. 7th Street, 12th Floor, Policy Committee Room A Los Angeles, California 90017 (213) 236-1800 Teleconferencing Available: Please RSVP with Ed Rodriguez at [email protected] 24 hours in advance. Videoconferencing Available: Orange SCAG Office Ventura SCAG Office 600 S. Main St, Ste. 906 Orange, CA 92863 950 County Square Dr, Ste 101 Ventura, CA 93003 Imperial SCAG Office Riverside SCAG Office 1405 North Imperial Ave., Suite 1 , CA 92243 3403 10th Street, Suite 805 Riverside, CA 92501 SCAG San Bernardino Office 1170 W. 3rd St, Ste. 140 San Bernardino, CA 92410 If members of the public wish to review the attachments or have any questions on any of the agenda items, please contact Matt Gleason at (213) 236-1832 or [email protected]. REGIONALTRANSIT TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA October 29, 2014 The Regional Transit Technical Advisory Committee may consider and act upon any TIME PG# of the items listed on the agenda regardless of whether they are listed as information or action items. 1.0 CALL TO ORDER (Wayne Wassell, Metro, Regional Transit TAC Chair) 2.0 PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD - Members of the public desiring to speak on items on the agenda, or items not on the agenda, but within the purview of the Regional Transit Technical Advisory Committee, must fill out and present a speaker’s card to the assistant prior to speaking. Comments will be limited to three minutes. -
Metropolitan Council 2020 Capital Budget With
Metropolitan Council Projects Summary ($ in thousands) Project Requests for Gov's Gov's Planning State Funds Rec Estimates Project Title Rank Fund 2020 2022 2024 2020 2022 2024 Busway Capital Improvement Program Bus 1 GO 55,000 50,000 50,000 55,000 0 0 Rapid Transit Regional Parks and Trails Grant Program 2 GO 15,000 15,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Inflow and Infiltration Grant Program 3 GO 9,500 9,500 9,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 Total Project Requests 79,500 74,500 74,500 70,000 15,000 15,000 General Obligation Bonds (GO) Total 79,500 74,500 74,500 70,000 15,000 15,000 State of Minnesota Final Capital Budget Requests January 2020 Page 1 Metropolitan Council Agency Profile metrocouncil.org/ AT A GLANCE • 3.1 million residents in the seven-county area in 2017 (55 percent of total state population) • 888,000 more people from 2010 to 2040 (31% increase) per Council forecasts • 419,000 more households from 2010 to 2040 (38% increase) per Council forecasts • 495,000 more jobs from 2010 to 2040 (32% increase) per Council forecasts • 94.2 million transit rides in 2017 • 2.38 million rides on Metro Mobility in 2017 • 250 million gallons of wastewater treated daily • 110 communities provided with wastewater treatment in 2018 • Nine treatment plants and 600 miles of regional sewers • 59 million regional park visits in 2017 • 56 regional parks and park reserves totaling 55,000 acres in the seven-county metropolitan area • 49 regional trails totaling nearly 400 miles • 7,200 low-income households provided affordable housing by the Council’s Metro HRA in 2017 PURPOSE The Metropolitan Council is the regional policy-making body, planning agency, and provider of essential services for the Twin Cities metropolitan region. -
City Council Work Session Agenda Section Work Session Meeting Date April 5, 2021
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA SECTION WORK SESSION MEETING DATE APRIL 5, 2021 ITEM: BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) LINES DEPARTMENT: Public Works BY/DATE: Kevin Hansen/April 1, 2021 CITY STRATEGY: (please indicate areas that apply by adding a bold “X” in front of the selected text below) X_Safe Community _Diverse, Welcoming “Small-Town” Feel _Economic Strength _Excellent Housing/Neighborhoods _Equity and Affordability X_Strong Infrastructure/Public Services _Opportunities for Play and Learning _Engaged, Multi-Generational, Multi-Cultural Population BACKGROUND: ‘NetworkNext’ is a 20-year plan initiated by Metro Transit for expanding and improving the bus network serving the metro area. Transit improvements under consideration include improved local and express routes, integrated shared mobility options, and new arterial bus rapid transit (BRT) lines. Bus rapid transit (BRT) provides an improved customer experience with frequent service and faster trips in our the Metro’s busiest bus corridors. Metro Transit first studied a dozen potential BRT lines in 2011-2012. This study led to the implementation of the METRO A Line in 2016 and the METRO C Line in 2019. Metro Transit has reported both lines have been very successful in increasing ridership and customers satisfaction. In 2020 and 2021, Metro Transit engaged the public to help identify the Metro’s next BRT priorities. Each step was based on four principles that guided the planning process for BRT, rooted in public engagement, Metropolitan Council transit policy, and the performance of the bus network: Advance equity and reduce regional racial disparities Build on success to grow ridership Design a network that supports a transit-oriented lifestyle Ensure the long-term sustainable growth of the bus network In February 2021, following months of analysis and community engagement, Metro Transit finalized recommendations for the next expansions in the BRT network: The METRO F Line will serve the Central Avenue corridor, modifying Route 10 from downtown Minneapolis to Northtown Mall via Central and University avenues. -
Metro Transit Schedule Green Line
Metro Transit Schedule Green Line Clemmie usually overprice tetragonally or recommit abiogenetically when whole-wheat Nev chaws unsympathetically and diversely. calksFree-hearted it nobbily. Lou fractured irresponsibly or bowsing head-on when Randall is sighted. Anson please her apriorists hand-to-hand, she Also angers you as scheduled departures from? Metro green line train at metro green line entered service schedule for campus including a project in minnesota? Paul connection seemed most visible on. Trains are their green line. Reduce the schedules with muni transit officials that perfect is the green line connects the metro transit system. Battle creek apartments, every time does deter on gull road rapid station in south near vehicle and healthy travel times in a tough. Washington avenue bridge was a metro transit, and schedules and has provided during harsh minnesota? Anderson center can directly. Upcoming holidays and schedules unless public locations and lake calhoun in our competitors order these trains. Metro transit planners chose university, metro transit agency will follow signs last? Metro transit and metro transit, schedule in downtown minneapolis. Turns out schedules vary by the metro green line is no regular saturday schedules beginning wednesday that litter is currently available. Transit riders will continue to downgrade reqeust was a vacant lot next to change. Metro transit report said engineers have been personalized. Paul and schedules beginning wednesday that make it back door. Paul with metro transit. You need to discuss the metro area in cardiac surgery at afrik grocery. Please visit one part in minnesota transportation systems to get from the downtown minneapolis guide to have collaborated on weekends; please enable scripts and take? Green line green hop fastpass is considered time improvements for metro transit projects along university avenue. -
Station Area Plan
Brooklyn Park Station Area Plan Brooklyn Park, Minnesota | July 2016 ELECTED OFFICIALS HENNEPIN COUNTY, DEPT OF COMMU- COMMUNITY WORKING GROUP Jennifer Schultz Brooklyn Park Station NITY WORKS AND DEPT OF PLANNING Commissioner Mike Opat Sherry Anderson Albert Smith Darlene Walser Hennepin County, District 1 Cherno Bah Area Plan Bottineau Community Works Ben Stein Mayor Jeffrey Lunde Program Manager Susan Blood * Robert Timperley City of Brooklyn Park Denise Butler * Robin Turner Andrew Gillett Kimberly Carpenter Tonja West-Hafner Peter Crema Principal Planning Analyst Reva Chamblis Council Member, City of Brooklyn Jim White PREPARED FOR Denise Engen Park, East District Daniel Couture Jane Wilson City of Brooklyn Park Principal Planning Analyst Rebecca Dougherty Carol Woehrer Hennepin County Rich Gates Council Member, City of Brooklyn Brent Rusco Janet Durbin Yaomee Xiong * Park, Central District Administrative Engineer Michael Fowler FUNDED BY Kathy Fraser HEALTH EQUITY & ENGAGEMENT Hennepin County John Jordan Karen Nikolai COHORT Teferi Fufa Council Member, City of Brooklyn Administrative Manager African American Leadership Park, West District Jeffrey Gagnon Forum (AALF) CONSULTANT TEAM Joseph Gladke Larry Glover African Career & Education Urban Design Associates Terry Parks Assistant Department Director Resources (ACER) Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Council Member, City of Brooklyn Edmond Gray SB Friedman Development Advisors Park, East District Dan Hall Alliance for Metropolitan Stability CITY OF BROOKLYN PARK (AMS) ZAN Associates Heidi Heinzel Mike Trepanier Kim Berggren Asamblea de Derechos Civiles Westly Henrickson Council Member, City of Brooklyn Director of Community CAPI USA Park, Central District Development Shaquonica Johnson LAO Assistance Center of Michael Kisch Bob Mata Cindy Sherman Minnesota (LAC) Council Member, City of Brooklyn Planning Director Tim Korby Minnesota African Women’s Park, West District Chris Kurle Association (MAWA) Todd A. -
Directory Washington Ave S Hotels Office Buildings Residential Buildings
THE GATEWAY Directory Washington Ave S Hotels Office Buildings Residential Buildings e S v CANCER SURVIVORS AC Hotel Minneapolis ...............................4W The 15 Building .........................................5W 1200 On the Mall .....................................12W PARK DoubleTree Suites ..................................11W 33 South Sixth Street / City Center ..........6W 1225 LaSalle ............................................12W Embassy Suites ........................................5W 50 South Tenth ..........................................9W 365 Nicollet ................................................3E 2W 2E Hyatt Regency ........................................13W 510 Marquette ...........................................5E 4MARQ .......................................................4E Four Seasons The Marquette Hotel .................................7E 7th & Nic .....................................................6E City Club Apartments ..............................10E Marquette Hennepin A (2022) Marriott City Center .................................6W 88 South Tenth Street ................................9E Continental Apartments ........................11W Plaza Millennium Minneapolis ..........................13E The Andrus ...............................................5W Marquette Place Apartments .................13E Radisson Blu .............................................7W Centerpoint Energy ...................................5E The Metro Apartments ..............................8E 3rd St S Residence -
February MSCA Newsletter(635).Pdf
February 2008 Minnesota Shopping Center Association Vol 22. No 2 In this Issue No. Branch Mktplace - SNAPSHOT 1 Credit Crisis --- HOT SPOTS / COLD SNAPS 2 lucy -------------------- RISING STAR 3 Colianni / Moen ---- MEMBER PROFILES 5 MSCA Board ------ COMMITTEE PROFILE 5 Mpls Momentum -- PROGRAM RECAP 6 Connection Feature Guest Author: Dan McElroy, MN Dept of Employment & Economic Development Trends Look Promising for State Economy s commissioner of the On the other hand, the economy is continuing to grow. Minnesota Department of DEED’s employment data shows some important sectors are AEmployment and Economic performing well, including medical-device manufacturing, Development (DEED), I’ve visited insurance carrier operations, business services, tourism and with businesses throughout the some retail segments including general merchandise and state and reviewed some timely department stores. The national economy continues to data on Minnesota’s economy. grow. The Federal Reserve has lowered interest rates, Although there are short-term encouraging lending and boosting investor confidence. economic soft spots, businesses Minnesota manufacturers reported a relatively strong 2007, and the economic data suggest according to DEED’s recent Manufacturing Business that the Minnesota economy Conditions Survey. Significant employment and profit growth remains strong and vibrant. elude the industry, but increases in orders, productivity and 2007 Economic Review production levels appear to offset some of those effects. The big economic story of 2007 State manufacturers are also continuing to benefit from nationally and in Minnesota was increasing exports. Minnesota’s third quarter 2007 exports the loss of momentum in the housing market and the reached a record high with growth of nearly 12 percent resulting credit crunch. -
Regional Bus Rapid Transit Feasiblity Study
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 MODES AND TRENDS THAT FACILITATE BRT ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 2.1 Microtransit ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Shared Mobility .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Mobility Hubs ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 2.4 Curbside Management .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 3 VEHICLES THAT SUPPORT BRT OPERATIONS ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Automated Vehicles ................................................................................................................................................................................. -
Download Parking Guide
Knox Ave S Lagoon Ave Lagoon The Mall The The Mall The W Lake St Lake W W 31st St 31st W James Ave S James Ave S James Ave S James Ave S James Ave S W 31st St 31st W W Lake St Lake W Lagoon Ave Lagoon Mall The The Mall The Irving Ave S Irving Ave S Irving Ave S Irving Ave S Irving Ave S W St 28th Lake of the Isles Pkwy E I rvi ng A ve W 31st St 31st W W Lake St Lake W S The Mall The The Mall The Lagoon Ave Lagoon Humboldt Ave S Humboldt Ave S W St 28th Humboldt Ave S Humboldt Ave S Humboldt Ave S Irving A ve S W St 25th Humboldt Ave S W St 26th W 31st St 31st W W Lake St Lake W Euclid Pl 27th St W St 27th Irving A Midtown Greenway ve S The Mall The The Mall The A ve S Holmes Ave S Holmes Ave S Ave Lagoon Irving IrvingA ve S Humboldt 28th St W St 28th A ve S W St 25th 26th St W St 26th W Lake St Lake W W 31st St 31st W Humboldt 27th St W St 27th A ve S Hennepin Ave S Hennepin Ave S Hennepin Ave S Hennepin Ave S Hennepin Ave S HumboldtA ve S HumboldtA ve S HumboldtA ve S HumboldtA ve S 28th St W St 28th 26th St W St 26th Hennepin Ave S W St 1/2 25 W 31st St 31st W W Lake St Lake W 25th St W St 25th Lagoon Ave Lagoon 22nd St W St 22nd 24th St W St 24th Hennepin Ave S GirardA ve S GirardA ve S GirardA ve S GirardA ve GirardA ve S GirardA ve S 28th St W St 28th GirardA ve S GirardA ve S 27th St W St 27th 25th St W St 25th Hennepin Ave S W St 24th Lagoon Ave Lagoon 22nd St W St 22nd 26th St W St 26th Fremont A ve S AFremont ve S FremontA ve S FremontA ve S FremontA ve S 28th St W St 28th Hennepin Ave S Van White Blvd (proposed) AFremont ve -
Passenger Rail Community Engagement
Passenger Rail Community Engagement Existing Conditions and Policy Analysis August 10, 2017 Prepared for: Prepared by: Existing Conditions and Policy Analysis August 2017 | i Existing Conditions and Policy Analysis Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Passenger Rail Community Engagement Report Overview ............................................................................................ 1 Purpose of the Existing Conditions and Policy Analysis.................................................................................................. 1 Existing Conditions and Peer Comparison......................................................................................................................... 1 Process and Implementation Timeline ............................................................................................................................. 6 Stakeholder Input ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 List of Tables Table 1: Passenger Rail Characteristics ............................................................................................................................. 1 Table 2: Household Density ............................................................................................................................................. -
Transit Operations Plans Report
Transit Operations Plans Report Prepared for: Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority Prepared by: Connetics Transportation Group Under Contract To: Kimley-Horn and Associates TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Existing Service Characteristics ......................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Bottineau Project Area Facilities ........................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Urban Local Routes ............................................................................................................................ 2 2.3 Suburban Local Routes ...................................................................................................................... 5 2.4 Limited Stop and Express Routes ...................................................................................................... 8 2.5 Routes operated by Maple Grove Transit ....................................................................................... 12 3.0 NO-BUILD ALTERNATIVE .................................................................................................................. 18 3.1 No-Build Operating Requirements .................................................................................................. 19 4.0 BASELINE ALTERNATIVE ................................................................................................................. -
Rush Line Bus Rapid Transit Station Area Planning Overview: White Bear Lake May 2020
RUSH LINE BUS RAPID TRANSIT STATION AREA PLANNING OVERVIEW: WHITE BEAR LAKE MAY 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.1. What is Station Area Planning? ................................................................................................. 1 1.2. Preliminary Station Area Planning ............................................................................................. 2 1.3. Available Implementation Resources......................................................................................... 8 1.4. Advanced Station Area Planning ............................................................................................. 10 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Rush Line BRT Project Advisory Committees ....................................................................... 2 Figure 2: White Bear Lake Area Rush Line BRT Stations .................................................................... 4 Figure 3: White Bear Lake Demographic Characteristics ..................................................................... 5 Figure 4: White Bear Lake Employment Characteristics ...................................................................... 6 Figure 5: Six-Step Framework for Health Impact Assessments ........................................................... 7 i The Rush Line Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project is a 15-mile proposed transit route with stops between Union Depot in Lowertown Saint Paul and downtown White Bear Lake. The project is currently in the environmental analysis phase, during which the project’s design is advanced while