DOCSLIB.ORG

November 15, 2017 the Honorable Paul

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
November 15, 2017 the Honorable Paul This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp November 15, 2017 The Honorable Paul Torkelson, Chair The Honorable Scott Newman, Chair House Transportation Finance Committee Senate Transportation Finance & Policy Committee 381 State Office Building 3105 Minnesota Senate Building Saint Paul, MN 55155 Saint Paul, MN 55155 The Honorable Linda Runbeck, Chair The Honorable Scott Dibble House Transportation & Regional Governance Policy Ranking Minority Member Committee Senate Transportation Finance & Policy Committee 417 State Office Building 2213 Minnesota Senate Building Saint Paul, MN 55155 Saint Paul, MN 55155 The Honorable Frank Hornstein, DFL Lead The Honorable Connie Bernardy, DFL Lead House Transportation Policy & Finance Committee House Transportation & Regional Governance Policy 243 State Office Building Committee Saint Paul, MN 55155 253 State Office Building Saint Paul, MN 55155 RE: 2017 Guideway Status report Dear Legislators: The Minnesota Department of Transportation, in collaboration with the Metropolitan Council, is pleased to provide the 2017 Guideway Status report as required under 2016 Minnesota Statutes 174.93, subdivision 2. This report updates information for eight guideway corridors currently in operation, construction or design, and thirteen more that are in planning or analysis phase, or that were at the time of the last report in 2015. The capacity analysis looks at regional guideway funding needs and resources related to capital, operations and capital maintenance for the next ten years. If you have specific questions about this report or want additional information, please contact MnDOT’s Brian Isaacson at [email protected] or at 651 234-7783; or, you can contact Met Council’s Cole Hiniker at [email protected] or at 651 602-1748. Sincerely, Charles A. Zelle Commissioner 2017 Guideway Status cover letter November 15, 2017 Guideway Status Report November 2017 2017 Guideway Status Report 1 Prepared by: The Minnesota Department of Transportation 395 John Ireland Boulevard Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-1899 Phone: 651-296-3000 Toll-Free: 1-800-657-3774 TTY, Voice or ASCII: 1-800-627-3529 In collaboration with: The Metropolitan Council 390 Robert Street North Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101-1805 Phone: 651-602-1000 To request this document in an alternative format, call 651-366-4718 or 1-800-657-3774 (Greater Minnesota). You may also send an email to [email protected] 2017 Guideway Status Report 2 Guideway Status Report .........................................................................................................................1 Legislative Request ........................................................................................................................................5 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................7 Statewide Planning .................................................................................................................................................7 Regional Planning....................................................................................................................................................8 Summaries: Corridors in Operation, Construction or Design .......................................................................... 12 METRO Blue Line (Hiawatha) LRT ....................................................................................................................... 12 Summary Financial Plan-Blue Line ....................................................................................................................... 12 Northstar Commuter Rail..................................................................................................................................... 16 Summary Financial Plan-Northstar ...................................................................................................................... 16 Red Line Bus Rapid Transitway/Cedar Avenue Transitway ................................................................................. 20 Summary Financial Plan-Red Line ........................................................................................................................ 20 METRO Green Line/Central Corridor LRT ........................................................................................................... 24 Summary Financial Plan-Green Line ..................................................................................................................... 24 METRO Green Line Extension (Southwest LRT) .................................................................................................. 28 Summary Financial Plan-Southwest LRT .............................................................................................................. 29 METRO Orange Line BRT/I-35W South ................................................................................................................ 32 Summary Financial Plan ....................................................................................................................................... 33 METRO Blue Line Extension / Bottineau LRT ...................................................................................................... 36 Summary Financial Plan-Bottineau LRT ............................................................................................................... 37 Metro Gold Line (Gateway Corridor) BRT ............................................................................................................ 40 Summary Financial Plan ....................................................................................................................................... 41 Corridors in Planning or Analysis Phases ....................................................................................................... 43 Highway 169 Mobility Study ................................................................................................................................ 43 Summary Financial Plan-Hwy 169 BRT ................................................................................................................ 44 I-35W North ......................................................................................................................................................... 46 Midtown Corridor ............................................................................................................................................... 47 Summary Financial Plan-Midtown Corridor ........................................................................................................ 48 Nicollet-Central Modern Streetcar ...................................................................................................................... 50 Summary Financial Plan-Nicollet Central ............................................................................................................. 51 Red Rock Corridor ............................................................................................................................................... 54 Robert Street Corridor ......................................................................................................................................... 56 2017 Guideway Status Report 3 Summary Financial Plan-Robert Street ................................................................................................................ 57 Rush Line Corridor ............................................................................................................................................... 61 Summary Financial Plan-Rush Line ...................................................................................................................... 62 Riverview Corridor ............................................................................................................................................... 65 Summary Financial Plan-Riverview Corridor ........................................................................................................ 65 West Broadway Corridor ..................................................................................................................................... 68 Summary Financial Plan-West Broadway ............................................................................................................ 68 Intercity Passenger Rail Corridors ................................................................................................................. 70 Northern Lights Express - Minneapolis to Duluth High Speed Passenger Rail .................................................... 70 Summary Financial Plan-NLX ............................................................................................................................... 71 Twin Cities-Milwaukee-Chicago Intercity Passenger Rail Service Phase 1 Study ................................................ 74 Summary Financial Plan-TCMC ............................................................................................................................ 75 Zip Rail - Twin Cities to Rochester High Speed Rail Corridor ............................................................................... 77 Twin Cities to Milwaukee Portion
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 6
    Chapter 6. Transportation Chapter Table of Contents VISION FOR THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ..................................................................................................... 3 REPORT ORGANIZATION ............................................................................................................................................. 3 ROADWAY SYSTEM PLAN............................................................................................................................................ 4 JURISDICTIONAL CLASSIFICATION ...................................................................................................................... 4 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION ............................................................................................................................. 7 PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS ..................................................................................... 14 COORDINATION WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS .......................................................................................... 14 2040 TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS ................................................................................................................ 18 EXISTING AND ANTICIPATED SYSTEM DEFICIENCIES ............................................................................... 20 FUTURE CAPACITY DEFICIENCIES ..................................................................................................................... 31 ROADWAY SAFETY .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota State Legislature -‐ House of Representatives
    Minnesota State Legislature - House of Representatives 463 State Office Building 529 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 St. Paul, MN 55155 Tony Albright (55B, R) Susan Allen651 (62B,-296 -DFL)5364 651-296-4212 407 State Office Building 229 State OfficeEmail: Building [email protected] Email:[email protected] St. Paul, MN 55155 St. Paul, MN 55155 651-296-5185 651-296-7152 Email:[email protected] Email:[email protected] Jim Davnie (63A, DFL) John (Jack) Considine Jr. (19B, DFL) 393 State Office Building 323 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 St. Paul, MN 55155 Sarah Anderson (44A, R) Paul Anderson651- 296(12B,-0173 R) 651-296-3248 583 State Office Building 597 State OfficeEmail: [email protected] Email:[email protected] St. Paul, MN 55155 St. Paul, MN 55155 651-296-5511 651-296-4317 Email:[email protected] Email:[email protected] Raymond Dehn (59B, DFL) Brian Daniels (24B, R) 279 State Office Building 551 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 St. Paul, MN 55155 Jon Applebaum (44B, DFL) 651-Tom296-8659 Anzelc (05B, DFL) 651-296-8237 223 State Office Building Email:[email protected] State Office Building Email:[email protected] St. Paul, MN 55155 St. Paul, MN 55155 651-296-9934 651-296-4936 Email:[email protected] Email: [email protected] David Dill (03A, DFL) Greg Davids (28B, R) 311 State Office Building 585 State Office Building St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Southwest LRT Corridor: Connecting People to Jobs, Housing, Shopping, and Fun
    Southwest LRT Community Works Vision Adopted by the Southwest LRT Community Works Steering Committee on April 21, 2011 The Southwest LRT corridor: connecting people to jobs, housing, shopping, and fun. The Southwest Community Works Initiative collaborates with citizens, businesses, and government to align land use and transit planning so that the Southwest LRT Corridor is a premiere destination that is · accessible · livable · vibrant Economic competitiveness and job growth Promoting opportunities for business and employment growth Housing choices Positioning the Southwest LRT communities as a place for all to live Quality neighborhoods Creating unique, vibrant, safe, beautiful, and walkable station areas Critical connections Improving affordable regional mobility for all users The Southwest LRT Corridor now and in the future is a: Jobs corridor: Within 1/2 mile: 210,000 jobs now; 270,000 by 2030 1,000 construction jobs per year (2014-2016) Housing corridor: Within 1/2 mile: 31,000 housing units now; over 40,000 by 2030 Growth corridor: Within 1/2 mile: 60,000 population now; 75,000 by 2030 Commuter corridor: Nearly 30,000 daily trips by 2030 High reverse commute ridership; over 7,000 daily trips by 2030 Southwest LRT Community Works Adopted Vision Statement The Southwest LRT Community Works Initiative collaborates with citizens, businesses and government to align land use and transit planning so that the Southwest LRT Corridor is a premiere destination that is accessible, livable and vibrant. Guiding Principles These Guiding Principles are a reflection of the cooperative efforts underway between the jurisdictions in the Southwest LRT Corridor to guide land use and economic development in and around station areas in a transit-supportive manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Transit Schedule Green Line
    Metro Transit Schedule Green Line Clemmie usually overprice tetragonally or recommit abiogenetically when whole-wheat Nev chaws unsympathetically and diversely. calksFree-hearted it nobbily. Lou fractured irresponsibly or bowsing head-on when Randall is sighted. Anson please her apriorists hand-to-hand, she Also angers you as scheduled departures from? Metro green line train at metro green line entered service schedule for campus including a project in minnesota? Paul connection seemed most visible on. Trains are their green line. Reduce the schedules with muni transit officials that perfect is the green line connects the metro transit system. Battle creek apartments, every time does deter on gull road rapid station in south near vehicle and healthy travel times in a tough. Washington avenue bridge was a metro transit, and schedules and has provided during harsh minnesota? Anderson center can directly. Upcoming holidays and schedules unless public locations and lake calhoun in our competitors order these trains. Metro transit planners chose university, metro transit agency will follow signs last? Metro transit and metro transit, schedule in downtown minneapolis. Turns out schedules vary by the metro green line is no regular saturday schedules beginning wednesday that litter is currently available. Transit riders will continue to downgrade reqeust was a vacant lot next to change. Metro transit report said engineers have been personalized. Paul and schedules beginning wednesday that make it back door. Paul with metro transit. You need to discuss the metro area in cardiac surgery at afrik grocery. Please visit one part in minnesota transportation systems to get from the downtown minneapolis guide to have collaborated on weekends; please enable scripts and take? Green line green hop fastpass is considered time improvements for metro transit projects along university avenue.
    [Show full text]
  • Next Steps Study
    Prepared for: City of Englewood 1000 Englewood Parkway Englewood, CO 80110-2373 City of Sheridan 4101 S. Federal Boulevard Sheridan, CO 80110-5399 Prepared by: Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 6300 S. Syracuse Way, Suite 600 Centennial, CO 80111 In Association With: ArLand LLC Bachman PR Design Workshop Toole Design Group Table of Contents Page Executive Summary -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ES-1 Acknowledgements ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ES-18 1.0 Introduction -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1.1 Study Location and Description -------------------------------------------------2 1.2 Vision ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 1.3 Objectives ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 1.4 Planning Context ---------------------------------------------------------------- 5 1.4.1 South Santa Fe Drive Corridor Improvements Study ------------------- 6 1.4.2 North Englewood Small Area Plan -------------------------------------- 6 1.4.3 CityCenter Englewood: Redevelopment of the Cinderella City Mall -- 6 1.4.4 Englewood Industrial Urban Renewal Plan and the General Ironworks Development Plan ------------------------------------------- 7 1.4.5 Southwest Light Rail Transit Line Major Investment Study ------------- 7 1.4.6 Englewood Civic Center Pedestrian Underpass Feasibility Study ----- 7
    [Show full text]
  • Station Area Plan
    Brooklyn Park Station Area Plan Brooklyn Park, Minnesota | July 2016 ELECTED OFFICIALS HENNEPIN COUNTY, DEPT OF COMMU- COMMUNITY WORKING GROUP Jennifer Schultz Brooklyn Park Station NITY WORKS AND DEPT OF PLANNING Commissioner Mike Opat Sherry Anderson Albert Smith Darlene Walser Hennepin County, District 1 Cherno Bah Area Plan Bottineau Community Works Ben Stein Mayor Jeffrey Lunde Program Manager Susan Blood * Robert Timperley City of Brooklyn Park Denise Butler * Robin Turner Andrew Gillett Kimberly Carpenter Tonja West-Hafner Peter Crema Principal Planning Analyst Reva Chamblis Council Member, City of Brooklyn Jim White PREPARED FOR Denise Engen Park, East District Daniel Couture Jane Wilson City of Brooklyn Park Principal Planning Analyst Rebecca Dougherty Carol Woehrer Hennepin County Rich Gates Council Member, City of Brooklyn Brent Rusco Janet Durbin Yaomee Xiong * Park, Central District Administrative Engineer Michael Fowler FUNDED BY Kathy Fraser HEALTH EQUITY & ENGAGEMENT Hennepin County John Jordan Karen Nikolai COHORT Teferi Fufa Council Member, City of Brooklyn Administrative Manager African American Leadership Park, West District Jeffrey Gagnon Forum (AALF) CONSULTANT TEAM Joseph Gladke Larry Glover African Career & Education Urban Design Associates Terry Parks Assistant Department Director Resources (ACER) Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Council Member, City of Brooklyn Edmond Gray SB Friedman Development Advisors Park, East District Dan Hall Alliance for Metropolitan Stability CITY OF BROOKLYN PARK (AMS) ZAN Associates Heidi Heinzel Mike Trepanier Kim Berggren Asamblea de Derechos Civiles Westly Henrickson Council Member, City of Brooklyn Director of Community CAPI USA Park, Central District Development Shaquonica Johnson LAO Assistance Center of Michael Kisch Bob Mata Cindy Sherman Minnesota (LAC) Council Member, City of Brooklyn Planning Director Tim Korby Minnesota African Women’s Park, West District Chris Kurle Association (MAWA) Todd A.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Transit Agency Outreach Summary
    Memorandum SRF No. 12758 To: Cole Hiniker, AICP Metropolitan Council From: Joseph Kapper, AICP SRF Consulting Group Date: May 20, 2020 Subject: Metropolitan Council Service Allocation Study Initial Transit Agency Outreach Summary Executive Summary Introduction One of the first tasks associated with the Service Allocation Study involved a report on existing conditions for transit service within the Minneapolis – St. Paul region. In addition to documenting the scope of transit service and socioeconomic data, the consultant team conducted outreach to each transit provider to understand the scope of their services and gain general input on the study. In March and April of 2020 several video and tele-conferences were held with individuals responsible for service monitoring, planning, and allocation at each agency. The content of each meeting included the following topics: • Offering an overview of the Service Allocation Study and gathering initial feedback on work to date and potential successful outcomes. • Transit agencies provide a summary of their current services. • How are transit operating resources allocated today? o How does the agency currently approach service allocation decisions? o What policies currently exist to guide service expansion or reduction? o Are there separate performance guidelines or goals for different types of service? • Agency planning and service development priorities. As of this memo’s completion, interviews have been conducted with Metro Transit, Minnesota Valley Transit Authority, SouthWest Transit, the City of Plymouth, Maple Grove Transit, and Metropolitan Transportation Services. Prior to each stakeholder interview, the consultant team reviewed the transit services currently offered by each agency, as well as relevant survey results, internal procedures, and long-range planning documents provided for the purposes of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota House of Representatives Seating Chart
    The Minnesota House of Representatives House Leadership Seat Paul Thissen ........................................... 139 Minnesota House of Representatives Public Information Services, 651-296-2146 or 800-657-3550 Speaker of the House District Room* 296- Seat Erin Murphy ........................................... 102 60B Kahn, Phyllis (DFL) ............365 ....... 4257 ....... 97 Majority Leader 21A Kelly, Tim (R) ......................335 ....... 8635 ....... 12 53B Kieffer, Andrea (R) ..............213 ....... 1147 ....... 43 Minnetonka—44B Kurt Daudt ............................................... 23 Shoreview—42B Murdock—17A Jason Isaacson John Benson 1B Kiel, Debra (R) ....................337 ....... 5091 ....... 30 Andrew Falk Seat 124 Seat 135 Minority Leader Seat 129 9B Kresha, Ron (R) ...................329 ....... 4247 ....... 53 Seat 1 Seat 6 41B Laine, Carolyn (DFL) ..........485 ....... 4331 ....... 82 Seat 11 Joe Hoppe Mayer—47A Ernie Leidiger Mary Franson Chaska—47B House Officers Alexandria—8B 47A Leidiger, Ernie (R) ...............317 ....... 4282 ......... 1 Mary Sawatzky Faribault—24B Willmar—17B Virginia—6B Albin A. Mathiowetz ....... 142 Timothy M. Johnson ....... 141 Jason Metsa 50B Lenczewski, Ann (DFL) ......509 ....... 4218 ....... 91 Seat 123 Seat 128 Seat 134 Patti Fritz Seat 139 Chief Clerk Desk Clerk Paul Thissen 66B Lesch, John (DFL) ...............537 ....... 4224 ....... 71 Patrick D. Murphy .......... 143 David G. Surdez ............. 140 Minneapolis—61B Seat 7 Seat 2 26A Liebling, Tina (DFL) ...........367 ....... 0573 ....... 90 Seat 12 Speaker of the House Kelly Tim Bob Dettmer 1st Asst. Chief Clerk Legislative Clerk Bob Barrett Lindstrom—32B Red Wing—21A Forest Lake—39A 4A Lien, Ben (DFL) ..................525 ....... 5515 ....... 86 Gail C. Romanowski ....... 144 Travis Reese ...................... 69 South St. Paul—52A Woodbury—53A Richfield—50A 2nd Asst. Chief Clerk Chief Sergeant-at-Arms Linda Slocum 43B Lillie, Leon (DFL) ...............371 ......
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Rail System
    Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Passenger Rail System draft technical memorandum 3 prepared for Minnesota Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. TKDA, Inc. July 17, 2009 www.camsys.com technical memorandum 3 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Passenger Rail System prepared for Minnesota Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 100 CambridgePark Drive, Suite 400 Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140 July 17, 2009 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Passenger Rail System Technical Memorandum Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. ES-1 1.0 Objective ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 2.0 Methodology ................................................................................................................. 2-1 3.0 Overview of Findings .................................................................................................. 3-1 4.0 Operating and Capacity Conditions and Existing Ridership Forecasts for Potential Passenger Rail Corridors ........................................................................... 4-1 4.1 CP: Rochester-Winona......................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 CP: St. Paul-Red
    [Show full text]
  • Your Ticket Andy Gitzla! of Washington County 651-430-4338 Or by E-Mail to the Southeast Metro [email protected] Planning Future Stations
    RED ROCK PREPARING FOR THE FUTURE CORRIDOR The Red Rock Corridor has seen population growth at a rate more than twice the state’s average. In the next 20 years, the southeast suburbs of the COMMISSION metropolitan area are projected to add more than 100,000 new residents. is a Joint Powers Commission of the following county rail PART OF A SYSTEM The Red Rock Corridor connects the southeastern suburbs with the entire authorities, corridor communities Twin Cities metro. Originating in Hastings, the corridor spans through and stakeholders: downtown St. Paul and on to downtown Minneapolis. Dakota County With a stop at the Union Depot in St. Paul, the Red Rock Corridor will seamlessly connect with Metro Transit buses, taxis, intercity buses, Central Hennepin County Corridor LRT, high-speed passenger rail from Chicago, Amtrak’s Empire Ramsey County Builder and future connections to both the Gateway and Rush Line Corridors. At the Minneapolis Interchange Station, Red Rock will connect Washington County to buses, taxis, Southwest LRT, Hiawatha LRT, Northstar commuter rail and Goodhue County* other planned future transitways. Newport St. Paul Park Minneapolis Hastings CP Railway* 3-FOR-1 Cottage Grove INVESTMENT The proposed high-speed rail line St. Paul connecting the Twin Cities to Chicago Denmark Twp. will share tracks with the Red Rock Corridor. Improvements to track Red Wing* 1 FREIGHT capacity and safety upgrades, including Prairie Island Indian Community* 2 lights, crossing gates, and additional COMMUTER RAIL tracks for a 3-for-1 investment in the corridor. *Non-voting members 3 HIGH-SPEED RAIL WWW.REDROCKRAIL.ORG Contact: Your Ticket Andy Gitzla! of Washington County 651-430-4338 or by e-mail to the Southeast Metro [email protected] Planning future stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee
    Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee September 26, 2016 The Goal . Implementation Plan that Outlines: . Detailed technical elements . Service plan, stations, vehicles, etc. Station area plans . Schedule and costs of staged investments . Partner responsibilities through 2040 . Stakeholder buy-in and detailed resolutions of support 2 Implementation Plan – Committee Structure TAC B-CAC RRCC Technical Business and Red Rock Advisory Civic Advisory Corridor Committee Committee Commission Staff from MnDOT, the Staff and leaders from Staff and elected officials Metropolitan Council, Metro businesses and civic from the cities and counties Transit, and the cities and organizations along the along the corridor counties along the corridor corridor 3 Bus Rapid Transit Alignment 4 Potential BRT Phases . Frequency: 15 minutes (30 minutes 7pm-12am) . Span: 5am-12am . BRT station amenities . Potential Phases: 1. To Cottage Grove w/o Gateway Stations 2. Add Gateway Stations 3. To Hastings Depot 4. Add last two Hastings Stations Evaluation of BRT Phases Ridership In-Service Daily PPISH Year PPISH* Increase Hours Boardings Target Needed BRT Phase 1 2024 92 1,070 12 114% ≥25 (To Cottage Grove) 2040 92 1,240 14 85% BRT Phase 2 2024 96 1,550 16 55% (add Gateway ≥25 Stations) 2040 96 1,800 19 33% BRT Phase 3 2040 114 2,000 18 ≥25 43% (to Hastings) BRT Phase 4 (final 2040 135 2,200 16 ≥25 54% Hastings stations) Red Line 2040 73 4,700 65 ≥25 ----- *Passengers per In-Service Hour = daily boardings divided by in-service hours 6 Ridership Increase Needed to Meet Regional Target . BRT Phase 2 (to Cottage Grove with Gateway Stations) is the best performing option in 2040 .
    [Show full text]
  • City of Forest Lake 2040 Comprehensive Plan June 2018
    DRAFT City of Forest Lake 2040 Comprehensive Plan June 2018 Table of Contents I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 Vision and Goals .................................................................................................... 1 Background/History of the Community ............................................................... 2 Purpose of the Plan ............................................................................................... 3 Process ................................................................................................................... 3 Regional Setting .................................................................................................... 3 II. Land Use .............................................................................................................................. 6 Land Use Goals and Objectives ............................................................................. 6 Forecasts and Current Demographics .................................................................. 7 Existing Land Use ................................................................................................. 10 Future Land Use .................................................................................................. 15 Natural Resources ............................................................................................... 24 Special Resource Protection ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]