METRO Blue Line Extension Newsletter May 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

METRO Blue Line Extension Newsletter May 2015 BROOKLYN PARK | CRYSTAL | ROBBINSDALE | GOLDEN VALLEY | MINNEAPOLIS Tracking the Blue Line Extension Issue 2 | May 2015 www.BlueLineExt.org A new, narrower plan proposed for West Broadway’s reconstruction with LRT Changes made in the last year to the design of the West Broadway Avenue reconstruction project including LRT in Brooklyn Park narrow the overall width significantly, lessening the impact on adjacent properties. The Metropolitan Council and Hen- nepin County are working together to reconstruct the road itself and install a center-running light rail line that would be an extension of the METRO Blue Line in Minneapolis. “The plan has changed dramatically,” Brooklyn Park Mayor Jeff Lunde told residents at a City Council meeting on April 28, referring to the engineer- ing work that’s been done to minimize impacts. In 2014, Hennepin County presented a redesign of West Broadway in Brooklyn Park that would have required taking many residences along the road. The city asked engineers to modify the de- sign to minimize impacts to residences and businesses. Earlier this year, Metropolitan Council and Hennepin County engineers began working together on a design for West Broadway that includes both a rede- signed roadway and the proposed Blue Top: A METRO Blue Line light rail train passes through a residential area near the Line Extension LRT Project. The Blue Veterans Administration Medical Center in south Minneapolis. Line Extension would run from Target Above: An artist’s rendering shows what light rail service would look like at the Field Station in downtown Minneapolis proposed 85th Avenue station along West Broadway Avenue. NEW PLAN continued on next page for news updates, project Visit us online at 2 www.BlueLineExt.org information and events NEW PLAN continued from first page to a station near the Target North cam- pus in Brooklyn Park. Above left: Blue Line Extension project director Dan Soler speaks Public feedback led to changes at a meeting in Brooklyn Park. In response to concerns voiced by resi- Above right: Project staff were on dents and the city, the maximum width hand to discuss design options. of the right-of-way for the West Broad- way Project was reduced from 176 feet Right: Meeting attendees gave to 142 feet. The reduction became feedback on design drawings. possible with the elimination of right- turn lanes, reduced lane, gutter and boulevard widths, trails located closer sent of the West Broadway and light to property lines and a reduced width rail projects a year from now, he said. needed for the LRT. The public meetings at North Henne- In March and April, staff from the Met- pin Community College featured both ropolitan Council’s Blue Line Extension roundtable discussions of the project, Project Office, Hennepin County and one to one conversations with the engi- the city of Brooklyn Park sponsored neering staff over maps, and opportu- public meetings at North Hennepin nity to ask questions in a public forum. Engineers from Hennepin County and Community College. The meetings Concerns were expressed about: the Metropolitan Council, as well as drew large crowds and provided the environmental staff, will consider those public a chance to learn about and give • Current road conditions and needed comments and other issues raised by feedback on both the West Broadway repairs the public as they continue work on the project and the light rail project. • A preference for a four-lane roadway project. design compared to a two-lane At the April 28 Brooklyn Park City design Council meeting, Mayor Lunde said • Better access and traffic signals at that the project’s redesign and nar- Maplebrook Parkway rower profile reflects the changes the city wanted made to the 2014 plan. • Noise and vibration from the LRT The Brooklyn Park City Council would line anticipate a vote on municipal con- • Property impacts, including valuation and acquisition TRACKING THE BLUE LINE EXTENSION Issue 2 May 2015 for news updates, project Visit us online at www.BlueLineExt.org information and events 3 Work underway to minimize number, size of property acquisitions along West Broadway Along West Broadway Avenue in Brooklyn Park, The acquisitions can include either permanent easements partners in the Blue Line Extension Project are on a property, such as an easement for drainage, a trail or a storm water pond. Or, work may require a temporary ease- working to minimize the number and size of ment, such as allowing workers to use property during a needed property acquisitions. construction period. Full ownership then reverts back to the owner after the project is complete. At public meetings in March and April, area property own- ers received first-hand information about the scope of the project, how it’s changed since 2014 and what’s ahead. The Metropolitan Council, Hennepin County and the city of Brooklyn Park are the three government units involved in the West Broadway project. When Hennepin County un- veiled the stand-alone road reconstruction project for West Broadway last summer, numerous homes were identified as potential acquisitions. In recent months, that plan has changed. The Blue Line Extension is now incorporated into West Broadway’s re- construction, and the redesign of the construction plan is intended to impact fewer properties. Engineers narrowed the LRT and road reconstruction proj- ects to avoid impacting more structures. The maximum width Property owners learn about the acquisitions process at an of the project was reduced from 176 feet to 142 feet. Engi- informational meeting in Brooklyn Park. neers accomplished that in several ways, including eliminat- ing right-turn lanes; reducing lane, gutter and boulevard widths; and reducing the width of the land needed for the After a preliminary design is completed, the Metropolitan Blue Line Extension. Council will seek municipal consent to the project from the cities and county. Once the environmental review is com- Final decisions on which properties will be acquired will be plete, with the issuance of the Record of Decision, property determined as engineering plans become more detailed in offers can begin. Offers and negotiations for needed land 2016. begin before construction starts but construction may pro- ceed before the negotiations are complete. Here’s what happens when property acquisitions Property owners can expect compensation for their property are needed that’s defined as fair market value. A settlement amount is negotiated. If relocation is necessary, reimbursement of eli- If property acquisitions are needed, the Metropolitan Coun- gible costs would be available based on federal or state law. cil would acquire property south of Candlewood and north of 93rd Avenue. Hennepin County would acquire property Owners may acquire their own appraisal, but state laws set between Candlewood and 93rd Avenue. maximums. For most cases, $1,500 is the maximum reim- bursement amount for an appraisal. At the community meetings along West Broadway, property owners asked questions about how project staff determines For details, see the Council’s information for property owners if their property could be a complete or partial acquisition. and renters about real estate acquisition and relocation as- sistance: http://bit.ly/1AAu3OW If a partial land acquisition is required, the owner typically retains the rest of the property. TRACKING THE BLUE LINE EXTENSION Issue 2 May 2015 for news updates, project Visit us online at 4 www.BlueLineExt.org information and events Keep Plymouth Avenue, Golden¤£169 ValleyOak Grove Road Parkway LRT stations in the mix for now, panel says ÉÉ610 93rd Avenue As the Metropolitan Council considers including feedback on the station locations and potential impacts to one or two LRT stations in Golden ValleyOSSEO in the the surrounding areas. METRO Blue Line Extension plans, project staff are Engineers85th Avenueare working on a technical analysis of both sta- weighing engineering issues, cost and community tions. The analysis will look at ridership, access for under- benefits. served populations, accessibility, connections to key destina- tions and access to regional parks. Brooklyn Boulevard While the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the The work also includes identifying the cost of construction Blue Line Extension analyzed stations at both Golden Valley andBROOKLYN evaluating floodplain and wetland impacts near the sta- Road and Plymouth Avenue, only one station is in the current tion sites.PAR K project budget. §¨¦94 At a Corridor Management Committee meetingEagle Lake in April, members asked project staff to continue the design and envi- 63rd Avenue ronmental review and development for both stations. The scope and budget for the entire Blue Line Extension Proj- ect is being reviewed, and the full Metropolitan Council is expected to make a decision this fall on whether to¤£169 build one Bass Lake Road or two LRT stations in Golden Valley. NEW Twin Lake HOPE What’s similar, different about the two station CRYSTAL ÉÉ100 locations Each station would be located in an area below the Plymouth Robbinsdale Avenue and Golden Valley Road bridges. §¨¦94 Both station sites are on right-of-way currently owned by BNSF Railway, which is located immediately east of the east- ROBBINS- ern edge of Theodore Wirth Park. DALE The stations are seven-tenths of a mile apart but would serve different neighborhoods. The Plymouth Avenue station site ÉÉ100 is technically in Golden Valley, but is adjacent to north Min- Golden Valley Road neapolis and the Willard-Hay neighborhood. The Golden Valley Road station site is close to Courage Kenny Rehabilita- Plymouth Avenue tion Institute and Golden Valley neighborhoods to the north Penn and west. É Van White É55 %% Community members have had several chances to weigh in GOLDEN Theodore Wirth on the locations of both stations. Those included community VA LL EY Park meetings held earlier this year in Golden Valley at Courage MINNEAP OLIS Kenny and at the Church of St.
Recommended publications
  • Metro Transit Schedule Green Line
    Metro Transit Schedule Green Line Clemmie usually overprice tetragonally or recommit abiogenetically when whole-wheat Nev chaws unsympathetically and diversely. calksFree-hearted it nobbily. Lou fractured irresponsibly or bowsing head-on when Randall is sighted. Anson please her apriorists hand-to-hand, she Also angers you as scheduled departures from? Metro green line train at metro green line entered service schedule for campus including a project in minnesota? Paul connection seemed most visible on. Trains are their green line. Reduce the schedules with muni transit officials that perfect is the green line connects the metro transit system. Battle creek apartments, every time does deter on gull road rapid station in south near vehicle and healthy travel times in a tough. Washington avenue bridge was a metro transit, and schedules and has provided during harsh minnesota? Anderson center can directly. Upcoming holidays and schedules unless public locations and lake calhoun in our competitors order these trains. Metro transit planners chose university, metro transit agency will follow signs last? Metro transit and metro transit, schedule in downtown minneapolis. Turns out schedules vary by the metro green line is no regular saturday schedules beginning wednesday that litter is currently available. Transit riders will continue to downgrade reqeust was a vacant lot next to change. Metro transit report said engineers have been personalized. Paul and schedules beginning wednesday that make it back door. Paul with metro transit. You need to discuss the metro area in cardiac surgery at afrik grocery. Please visit one part in minnesota transportation systems to get from the downtown minneapolis guide to have collaborated on weekends; please enable scripts and take? Green line green hop fastpass is considered time improvements for metro transit projects along university avenue.
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Rail Community Engagement
    Passenger Rail Community Engagement Existing Conditions and Policy Analysis August 10, 2017 Prepared for: Prepared by: Existing Conditions and Policy Analysis August 2017 | i Existing Conditions and Policy Analysis Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Passenger Rail Community Engagement Report Overview ............................................................................................ 1 Purpose of the Existing Conditions and Policy Analysis.................................................................................................. 1 Existing Conditions and Peer Comparison......................................................................................................................... 1 Process and Implementation Timeline ............................................................................................................................. 6 Stakeholder Input ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 List of Tables Table 1: Passenger Rail Characteristics ............................................................................................................................. 1 Table 2: Household Density .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Operations Plans Report
    Transit Operations Plans Report Prepared for: Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority Prepared by: Connetics Transportation Group Under Contract To: Kimley-Horn and Associates TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Existing Service Characteristics ......................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Bottineau Project Area Facilities ........................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Urban Local Routes ............................................................................................................................ 2 2.3 Suburban Local Routes ...................................................................................................................... 5 2.4 Limited Stop and Express Routes ...................................................................................................... 8 2.5 Routes operated by Maple Grove Transit ....................................................................................... 12 3.0 NO-BUILD ALTERNATIVE .................................................................................................................. 18 3.1 No-Build Operating Requirements .................................................................................................. 19 4.0 BASELINE ALTERNATIVE .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • November 15, 2017 the Honorable Paul
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp November 15, 2017 The Honorable Paul Torkelson, Chair The Honorable Scott Newman, Chair House Transportation Finance Committee Senate Transportation Finance & Policy Committee 381 State Office Building 3105 Minnesota Senate Building Saint Paul, MN 55155 Saint Paul, MN 55155 The Honorable Linda Runbeck, Chair The Honorable Scott Dibble House Transportation & Regional Governance Policy Ranking Minority Member Committee Senate Transportation Finance & Policy Committee 417 State Office Building 2213 Minnesota Senate Building Saint Paul, MN 55155 Saint Paul, MN 55155 The Honorable Frank Hornstein, DFL Lead The Honorable Connie Bernardy, DFL Lead House Transportation Policy & Finance Committee House Transportation & Regional Governance Policy 243 State Office Building Committee Saint Paul, MN 55155 253 State Office Building Saint Paul, MN 55155 RE: 2017 Guideway Status report Dear Legislators: The Minnesota Department of Transportation, in collaboration with the Metropolitan Council, is pleased to provide the 2017 Guideway Status report as required under 2016 Minnesota Statutes 174.93, subdivision 2. This report updates information for eight guideway corridors currently in operation, construction or design, and thirteen more that are in planning or analysis phase, or that were at the time of the last report in 2015. The capacity analysis looks at regional guideway funding needs and resources related to capital, operations and capital maintenance for the next ten years. If you have specific questions about this report or want additional information, please contact MnDOT’s Brian Isaacson at [email protected] or at 651 234-7783; or, you can contact Met Council’s Cole Hiniker at [email protected] or at 651 602-1748.
    [Show full text]
  • Transitway Branding Transportation Committee January 23, 2012 Northstar Line Continued
    Transitway Branding Transportation Committee January 23, 2012 Northstar Line continued 94 94 35W 35E 694 94 694 Northstar Line 694 94 35W 35E Minneapolis 694 394 Green Line St. Paul 94 494 extension Blue Line Green Line 494 494 Orange Line Orange 35W 35E 77 METRO system Red Line June 2014 Downtown Minneapolis Inset Blue Line (LRT) 94 Green Line (LRT) 35W Orange Line (BRT) 55 Red Line (BRT) Transit Stations Northstar Line (commuter rail) 94 Regional Multimodal Hub 35W Miles 0 1 2 4 6 Metropolitan Council Regional Transit Services Branding Service Type Name Logo LRT & Hwy BRT METRO Local, Limited, Express Bus Metro Transit Commuter Rail Metro Transit Northstar Regional ADA Metro Mobility Regional Dial-a-Ride Transit Link Regional Vanpool Metro Vanpool Metro Street side back Curb side front NOTE: KIOSK 1 - ALL STAINLESS STEEL SHEET IS 316L W/ #6 BRUSH FINISH. ILLUMINATED D/F CABINET W/ - ALL STAINLESS STEEL TO BE ADHERED WITH 3M4950 VHB TAPE. ILLUMINATED S/F HEADER - ALL DISSIMILAR METALS TO BE TREATED WITH ECK (ELECTROLYSIS CORROSION KONTROL) TO PROHIBIT DISSIMILAR METALS FROM ELECTROLYSIS AND GALVANIC CORROSION.A HEADER - FABRICATED ALUMINUM W/ STAINLESS STEEL EXTERIOR SHEETING 3 2 - SIDE A TO HAVE CLEAR LEXAN FACE WITH 2ND SURFACE VINYL GRAPHICS - ONLY “INFORMATION” COPY IS TO ILLUMINATE WHITE - SIDE B TO BE BLANK FACE B CABINET - FABRICATED ALUMINUM W/ STAINLESS STEEL EXTERIOR SHEETING - TWO GILL STYLE LOUVERED VENTS ON EACH END 3 - SIDE A TO HAVE DIGITAL PRINT INSERT SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY OTHERS - SIDE B TO HAVE VINYL GRAPHICS APPLIED TO DIFFUSER C CABINET DOOR - FABRICATED STAINLESS STEEL SQ.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Guide for Minneapolis Visitors
    August 2015 TRANSIT GUIDE FOR MINNEAPOLIS VISITORS 11 61 6 4 2nd St NE 1st Ave 61 4th St SE 6 Main 4 25 17 6 10 Hennepin University Ave River Place 6 6 2nd St SE 4 6 1st St Bryant 4 Main 5 Central Ave 22 5th Ave St. Anthony Main Olson Memorial Hwy 19 6th Ave 12 5th St 6 3 2nd St 14 Target Field Station N 11 1st St Washingto West River Pkwy Mississippi River Main Northstar Line Platform N e N 59 TargetT tF Fieldild 1st Ave 25 LEGEND Target Field AvAve Ramp C 17 Platform 2 Platform 1 7th St 3rd Ave n 7 10 5th Ave N 3rd St 4th St e N 14 0 2.5 5 5 3 2nd Ave 19 Walking time (minutes) 22 St. Anthony Falls 4th Ave Bryant 14 12 7 6 METRO Green Line Target Field 3 Farmers 3 2nd St approximately every 10 minutes 4 1st St throughout the day; every 10-15 Market Blue Line 11 minutes evenings; every 30-60 Ramp B/5th Street Green Line Royalston Warehouse District/ Transit Center Washingto minutes overnight. Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis 3rd St Stone Arch Bridge Central The Depot Marquette METRO Blue Line Border 14 n N Library Minneapolis Mill Ruins approximately every 10 minutes 94 Park Milwaukee during weekday rush hours; 94 1st Ave 4th St 2nd Ave S Residence every 10 minutes midday; Target Cowles Road Depot We Inn st Center Center Riv every 15 minutes evenings. Twins Way 5 5th St er 3rd Ave S 18 P 19 59 kw Loews y METRO Station Glenwood 22 Nicollet Mall 11 94 Hotel Hennepin 25 Mill City 4th Ave Gateway Mayo Clinic 6th St 3 18 7 Museum Northstar Commuter Rail Ramp A/7th Street First Transit Center 94 7 Transit Center Avenue Square 17 22 Colfax 14 Hotels
    [Show full text]
  • Northstar Commuter Rail Extension Feasibility Assessment: Summary
    Office of Freight and Commercial Vehicle Operations 395 John Ireland Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55155 7/31/2020 Northstar Commuter Rail Extension Feasibility Assessment An assessment of the feasibility to extend Northstar commuter rail service to St. Cloud was conducted by MnDOT and Metro Transit at the direction of the Minnesota State legislature during its 2019 session. This included evaluation of capital and service costs. Ridership forecasting was not included. Background Northstar Commuter Rail began operation in 2009 between downtown Minneapolis and Big Lake, serving seven stations (Target Field, Fridley, Coon Rapids, Anoka, Elk River, Big Lake) with six morning and six afternoon rush hour trains on weekdays; three trains each direction on Saturdays, Sundays and Holiday; special trains for each Minnesota Twins Game at Target Field and other special events. In October 2019, ridership averaged 2,550 on weekdays, 260 on Saturdays, and 166 on Sundays. Twins Game day ridership increased 800-1,000 over the average. Total project cost was $308.5 million. In 2010, Metro Transit and the Northstar Corridor Development Authority (NCDA) evaluated the potential for extending commuter rail to St. Cloud. At that time the findings in capital, operating cost, infrastructure constraints and limited ridership led to a recommendation of deferring further development of rail service extension. The following criteria were identified as needed to trigger re-evaluation: • Ridership: >4,500 average daily Phase I and Northstar Link boardings: As the economy recovers, if average daily Phase I ridership grows closer to initial projections and Northstar Link continues to grow, project reevaluation may be justified.
    [Show full text]
  • List of LCA Awards by City
    Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Grants by City, 1996-Present City Grant Name Fund Funding Year Awarded Amount Relinquished Amount Anoka Anoka Station Area Master Planning LCDA 2011 $22,500 $0 Anoka Greenhaven Housing LCDA 2010 $75,000 $0 Anoka IMI Cornelius (fka Eniva) TBRA 2007 $339,000 $101,162 Anoka Anoka North Central Business District LCDA 2005 $1,000,000 $0 Anoka Heart of Anoka LCDA 2001 $70,000 $0 Anoka North Central Business District TBRA 2001 $116,870 $0 Anoka Total $1,623,370 $101,162 TOD Pre-Development & Repositioning at 147th Street and Garrett Avenue and Glazier Apple Valley Avenue LCDA 2016 $35,000 $0 Apple Valley Village Pointe Plaza LCDA 2014 $1,148,639 $0 Cedar Village West (fka Commons I and Apple Valley Commons II Site Acquisition Assistance) LCDA 2011 $866,000 $866,000 Apple Valley Gathering (fka The Enclave Trails) LCDA 2011 $174,800 $174,800 Cobblestone Lakes Senior Housing & Park Apple Valley Improvement LCDA 2011 $896,000 $0 Market Analysis for the Hanson Concrete Apple Valley Site LCDA 2010 $50,000 $0 Apple Valley Master TOD Development Plan LCDA 2010 $60,000 $0 Apple Valley Cobblestone Senior Housing LCDA 2008 $556,834 $0 Apple Valley Central Village - Legacy Park North LCDA 2005 $425,000 $0 Harmony Commons (fka The Village at Apple Valley Founders Circle) LCDA 2004 $2,356,244 $2,356,244 Apple Valley Lebanon Valley Place LHIA 2003 $150,000 $0 Central Village Small Area Plan - II (fka Apple Valley Galaxie Avenue) LCDA 2002 $30,000 $0 Central Village Small Area Plan - I (fka Apple Valley Galaxie Avenue) LCDA
    [Show full text]
  • METRO GREEN LINE Light Rail Time Schedule & Line Route
    METRO GREEN LINE light rail time schedule & line map METRO GREEN LINE To Mpls-Target Field View In Website Mode The METRO GREEN LINE light rail line (To Mpls-Target Field) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) To Mpls-Target Field: 4:33 AM - 11:17 PM (2) To St. Paul-Union Depot: 5:06 AM - 11:19 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest METRO GREEN LINE light rail station near you and ƒnd out when is the next METRO GREEN LINE light rail arriving. Direction: To Mpls-Target Field METRO GREEN LINE light rail Time Schedule 24 stops To Mpls-Target Field Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 4:48 AM - 11:17 PM Monday 4:33 AM - 11:17 PM Union Depot Station 208 4th Street East, St. Paul Tuesday 4:33 AM - 11:17 PM Central Station Wednesday 4:33 AM - 11:17 PM 58 5th Street East, St. Paul Thursday 4:33 AM - 11:17 PM 10th Street Friday 4:33 AM - 11:17 PM 519 Cedar Street, St. Paul Saturday 4:48 AM - 11:17 PM Robert Street 613 Robert Street North, St. Paul Capitol/Rice St 475 Rice Street, St. Paul METRO GREEN LINE light rail Info Direction: To Mpls-Target Field Western Avenue Stops: 24 377 University Avenue West, St. Paul Trip Duration: 46 min Line Summary: Union Depot Station, Central Station, Dale Street 10th Street, Robert Street, Capitol/Rice St, Western 489 Dale Street North, St. Paul Avenue, Dale Street, N Victoria St, Lexington Parkway, Hamline Avenue, Snelling Avenue, Fairview N Victoria St Avenue, Raymond Avenue, Westgate, Prospect Park, University Avenue, St.
    [Show full text]
  • SWLRT Civil Construction Update
    2021 Construction and Going Forward As announced on Thursday, over the course of the 2020 construction season, the project staff and our contractor, Lunda-McCrossan Joint Venture encountered unforeseen obstacles in the Minneapolis portion of the alignment which will take longer to overcome. These obstacles include the construction of the corridor protection wall along the BNSF fright rail line and a secant wall to complete LRT tunnel construction in a portion of the Kenilworth corridor due to poor soil conditions. These are no small changes and require thoughtful and deliberate engineering, design plans and construction methods. While these types of setbacks are not uncommon on projects of this scale, we are also disappointed by this development. We strongly believe the long-term benefits of this project to the region and state outweigh the short-term challenges we face. While this means we most likely won’t be meeting our opening day projection of 2023, we know that 2021 will be a robust construction year. To see an overview of 2021 construction activities in Minneapolis, view the recording of the January 14 Minneapolis Town Hall. We will be sharing 2021 overviews of construction activities in the corridor cities of Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, Hopkins, and St. Louis Park in the coming weeks. Weekly Construction Photo: SouthWest Station in Eden Prairie 1 | Page Looking east towards SouthWest Station construction crews install piles that will support the bus loop/roadway. Due to poor soils conditions, project elements including track, stations, roadway and utilities are supported by piles. Eden Prairie Eden Prairie Construction: Map 1 of 2 2 | Page SouthWest Station to Eden Prairie Town Center Station Construction Overview: At the SouthWest Station we are constructing a new park-and-ride ramp adjacent to the existing ramp and a combined bus and LRT station.
    [Show full text]
  • View and Approval by Minnesota’S Tal Design (Leed) Program
    ARGET FIELD Station, located in downtown Minneapolis, is a state- deNt of-the-art, multimodal mass transit station in- iviC i ity i corporating complementary mixed-used devel- C s B opment and year-round public space. It is no ew Located in downtown Minneapolis, or disadvantage that it is also connected to Target N Target Field Station is more than simply a light-rail hub. N Field, the home of the Minnesota Twins. With A more than 500 trains passing through each day, In addition to facilitating the flow of large crowds to the home of the Target Field Station is the new “Grand Cen- tral Station” for Minneapolis, providing links Minnesota Twins, the station offers an amphitheater, public gathering spaces, to residential areas, workplaces, shopping and economic development opportunities. Designed with the environment in mind, destinations, major sporting events, and concerts while enabling travelers to visit other it also features innovative measures for collecting and reusing stormwater attractions in the Twin Cities area. runoff and snowmelt. ..... By Justin Gese, p.e., m.asce However, the facility is more than just a mass Ttransit station and mover of people. This mul- tiuse station is a community destination that provides a year-round public meeting space complete with expansive green lawns, lush veg- etation, and a 1,000-seat amphitheater. It offers new development opportunities for businesses and places for people to shop. Stormwater cap- tured on-site and water obtained through an in- novative snowmelt system are conveyed to an adjacent energy facility and reused. Moreover, the station features sustainable landscaping, and the various other context-sensitive design and construction techniques employed give it a light environmental footprint.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Transit Police Department Safety & Security Update
    Metro Transit Police Department Safety & Security Update House Transportation Finance & Policy Committee September 25, 2018 Mission Protecting our community through innovation and problem solving Vision A department that is reflective of and responsive to the community we serve 2 Broad geographic service area – East and West commands – Dispatch center (TCC) – Minneapolis, Saint Paul footbeats – Substations • Downtown Minneapolis • Downtown Saint Paul • Mall of America – Patrol squads – Bike rapid response team – Special events 3 Metro Transit Police Staffing 185 Sworn police officers 115/115 Full-time 60/100 Part-time 18/20 CSO 17/17 Admin support Demographic Women 38 Latino 11 Asian-American 21 African-American 32 Native American 2 4 Metro Transit ridership compared to reports of crime incidents 2015 – July 31, 2018 More than 296.6 million rides given Reported Total Incidents vs. classification 500,000 Rides Part I 2,542 3 Part II 21,392 25.4 Total 23,934 28.4 5 2018 Enforcement by the numbers • Proactive times on board buses: 17,111 • Proactive times on board light rail and commuter rail vehicles: 28,287 • Fare checks: – Light rail and commuter vehicles: 1.2 million – A Line and Red Line BRT vehicles: 61,000 • Special events 109 • Responses by patrol squads: 36,071 calls 6 Five E’s of public safety and security • Evidence – Predictive policing • Engagement – Community and professional partnership • Education- Public information and crime prevention • Engineering- Crime prevention through environmental design • Enforcement – Uniform
    [Show full text]