Document 00150

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Document 00150 Green Line LRT Extension (“Southwest LRT”) Civil Construction 00150 ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS Notice is given that on January 9, 2018 at 2:00 P.M. the Metropolitan Council will receive and publicly open separate sealed bids for Green Line LRT Extension (“Southwest LRT”) Civil Construction, Project Number 61001, Contract Number 15P307A, at their office at 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN, 55101-1805. Sealed bids should be delivered to the receptionist. This is a re-bid of solicitation 15P307. Subcontractors who worked on the following contracts: Advanced Design Consultant Services for the METRO Green Line Extension (Southwest LRT) Project, Preliminary Engineering Consultant Services for the Southwest Light Rail Transit Project – Eden Prairie and Minnetonka, or Preliminary Engineering Consultant Services for the Southwest Light Rail Transit Project – Hopkins, St. Louis Park and Minneapolis, cannot work as a subcontractor on this construction contract. Section 12.06 of the contracts states: “Restriction on Subcontractor Work. All subcontracts shall state that the subcontractor agrees that it will not enter into agreements of any type with construction contracting firms, or their subcontractors, for any construction project resulting from the preparation or issuance of construction documents from the Work of this Contract.” The following is a list, provided by the Primes of the above contracts, of subcontractors on those contracts: • Aero-Metric, Inc. • LV Engineering, LLC • American Engineering Testing, Inc. • MFRA, Inc (AET) • Miller Dunwiddie Architecture, Inc. • Braun Intertec Corporation • MN Best, Inc. • CDM Consultants LLC • M-P Consultants, Inc. • Connetics Transportation Group, • Professional Engineering Services (PES) Inc. • Progressive Consulting Engineers, Inc. • Cross-Spectrum Acoustics Inc. • Rani Engineering, Inc. • Duan Corporation • Sambatek, Inc. • Gannett Fleming Transit & Rail • Snow Kreilich Architects, Inc. Systems • Sowinski Sullivan Arch • EPC Consultants, Inc. • SRF Consulting Group, Inc. • Hansen Thorp Pellinen Olson • SYSTRA Consulting, Inc. (HTPO) • TBE Group, Inc. dba Cardno TBE • HZ United • Transportation Technology Center, Inc. • Isthmus Engineering, Inc. • Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson and Associates, • Julie Snow Architects, Inc. Inc. (TKDA) • Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. • T.Y. Lin International • LHB, Inc. • Utility Mapping Service • LTK Engineering Services • WSB & Associates, Inc. • WSP (formerly Parsons Brinckerhoff) If a Bidder includes a subcontractor from this list in its Bid, the Bidder will be found to be nonresponsive, will be rejected from the bidding process, and will be given no further consideration. The Green Line Light Rail Transit Extension (Southwest Light Rail Transit Line) is approximately 14.5 miles of new double track proposed as an extension of the METRO Green Line (Central Corridor LRT). The Work is located in the following 5 cities: Minneapolis, St Louis Park, Hopkins, Minnetonka, and Eden Prairie, extending from Target Field Station in Minneapolis to SouthWest Transit Station in Eden Prairie. 15P307A Advertisement for Bids 61001 00150-1 Green Line LRT Extension (“Southwest LRT”) Civil Construction The Work of this Project includes new bridges, pedestrian cut and cover LRT tunnels, cut and cover tunnels, modifications to existing bridges, retaining walls, light rail track, park-and-ride surface lots and a parking ramp, light rail stations, the demolition of existing buildings, trail improvements, freight rail relocation, underground public utilities, underground communications, drainage, sidewalk and roadway pavements, street lighting, signal and traction power ducts, above and below-grade traffic signal facilities, and catenary pole foundations. For the purposes of this contract, the COUNCIL has established a 16% goal for DBE participation. Disadvantaged businesses can be found on the Minnesota Unified Certification Program (MnUCP) Directory. This directory can be found at the following website: https://mnucp.metc.state.mn.us/. Click Here to view plan documents for no charge and to download them for a nonrefundable cost of $10.00. Input QuestCDN eBidDoc™ 5404525 on the website’s Project Search page. Contact QuestCDN.com at 952-233-1632 or [email protected] for assistance in downloading and working with the digital documents. Bidders are strongly encouraged to verify subcontractor’s State and Federal debarment and suspension status at: http://www.mmd.admin.state.mn.us/debarredreport.asp. Per 2 CFR 200.319, contractors that develop or draft specifications, requirements, statements of work, and invitations for bids or requests for proposals must be excluded from competing for such procurements. A Pre-Bid Meeting will be held in the Fellowship Hall of St. Andrew Lutheran Church, 13600 Technology Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 on Monday, November 13, 2017 @ 2:00 p.m. Bidders are strongly encouraged to attend. To save registration time, voluntary pre-registration is available at the Southwest LRT construction page at: https://metrocouncil.org/swlrt/construction/procurement. The COUNCIL has created a virtual flyover of the Project alignment. The flyover can be viewed on the Construction Contract Procurement page of the Southwest LRT home page at: https://metrocouncil.org/swlrt/construction/procurement. Direct inquiries to the COUNCIL’s Project Manager, Nat Gorham, at 612-373-3889 or [email protected]. The geographical area for this notice and contract is Hennepin County. Dated this 30th day of October, 2017 15P307A Advertisement for Bids 61001 00150-2 .
Recommended publications
  • Metro Transit Schedule Green Line
    Metro Transit Schedule Green Line Clemmie usually overprice tetragonally or recommit abiogenetically when whole-wheat Nev chaws unsympathetically and diversely. calksFree-hearted it nobbily. Lou fractured irresponsibly or bowsing head-on when Randall is sighted. Anson please her apriorists hand-to-hand, she Also angers you as scheduled departures from? Metro green line train at metro green line entered service schedule for campus including a project in minnesota? Paul connection seemed most visible on. Trains are their green line. Reduce the schedules with muni transit officials that perfect is the green line connects the metro transit system. Battle creek apartments, every time does deter on gull road rapid station in south near vehicle and healthy travel times in a tough. Washington avenue bridge was a metro transit, and schedules and has provided during harsh minnesota? Anderson center can directly. Upcoming holidays and schedules unless public locations and lake calhoun in our competitors order these trains. Metro transit planners chose university, metro transit agency will follow signs last? Metro transit and metro transit, schedule in downtown minneapolis. Turns out schedules vary by the metro green line is no regular saturday schedules beginning wednesday that litter is currently available. Transit riders will continue to downgrade reqeust was a vacant lot next to change. Metro transit report said engineers have been personalized. Paul and schedules beginning wednesday that make it back door. Paul with metro transit. You need to discuss the metro area in cardiac surgery at afrik grocery. Please visit one part in minnesota transportation systems to get from the downtown minneapolis guide to have collaborated on weekends; please enable scripts and take? Green line green hop fastpass is considered time improvements for metro transit projects along university avenue.
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Rail Community Engagement
    Passenger Rail Community Engagement Existing Conditions and Policy Analysis August 10, 2017 Prepared for: Prepared by: Existing Conditions and Policy Analysis August 2017 | i Existing Conditions and Policy Analysis Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Passenger Rail Community Engagement Report Overview ............................................................................................ 1 Purpose of the Existing Conditions and Policy Analysis.................................................................................................. 1 Existing Conditions and Peer Comparison......................................................................................................................... 1 Process and Implementation Timeline ............................................................................................................................. 6 Stakeholder Input ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 List of Tables Table 1: Passenger Rail Characteristics ............................................................................................................................. 1 Table 2: Household Density .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Operations Plans Report
    Transit Operations Plans Report Prepared for: Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority Prepared by: Connetics Transportation Group Under Contract To: Kimley-Horn and Associates TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Existing Service Characteristics ......................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Bottineau Project Area Facilities ........................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Urban Local Routes ............................................................................................................................ 2 2.3 Suburban Local Routes ...................................................................................................................... 5 2.4 Limited Stop and Express Routes ...................................................................................................... 8 2.5 Routes operated by Maple Grove Transit ....................................................................................... 12 3.0 NO-BUILD ALTERNATIVE .................................................................................................................. 18 3.1 No-Build Operating Requirements .................................................................................................. 19 4.0 BASELINE ALTERNATIVE .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • METRO Blue Line Extension Newsletter May 2015
    BROOKLYN PARK | CRYSTAL | ROBBINSDALE | GOLDEN VALLEY | MINNEAPOLIS Tracking the Blue Line Extension Issue 2 | May 2015 www.BlueLineExt.org A new, narrower plan proposed for West Broadway’s reconstruction with LRT Changes made in the last year to the design of the West Broadway Avenue reconstruction project including LRT in Brooklyn Park narrow the overall width significantly, lessening the impact on adjacent properties. The Metropolitan Council and Hen- nepin County are working together to reconstruct the road itself and install a center-running light rail line that would be an extension of the METRO Blue Line in Minneapolis. “The plan has changed dramatically,” Brooklyn Park Mayor Jeff Lunde told residents at a City Council meeting on April 28, referring to the engineer- ing work that’s been done to minimize impacts. In 2014, Hennepin County presented a redesign of West Broadway in Brooklyn Park that would have required taking many residences along the road. The city asked engineers to modify the de- sign to minimize impacts to residences and businesses. Earlier this year, Metropolitan Council and Hennepin County engineers began working together on a design for West Broadway that includes both a rede- signed roadway and the proposed Blue Top: A METRO Blue Line light rail train passes through a residential area near the Line Extension LRT Project. The Blue Veterans Administration Medical Center in south Minneapolis. Line Extension would run from Target Above: An artist’s rendering shows what light rail service would look like at the Field Station in downtown Minneapolis proposed 85th Avenue station along West Broadway Avenue.
    [Show full text]
  • November 15, 2017 the Honorable Paul
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp November 15, 2017 The Honorable Paul Torkelson, Chair The Honorable Scott Newman, Chair House Transportation Finance Committee Senate Transportation Finance & Policy Committee 381 State Office Building 3105 Minnesota Senate Building Saint Paul, MN 55155 Saint Paul, MN 55155 The Honorable Linda Runbeck, Chair The Honorable Scott Dibble House Transportation & Regional Governance Policy Ranking Minority Member Committee Senate Transportation Finance & Policy Committee 417 State Office Building 2213 Minnesota Senate Building Saint Paul, MN 55155 Saint Paul, MN 55155 The Honorable Frank Hornstein, DFL Lead The Honorable Connie Bernardy, DFL Lead House Transportation Policy & Finance Committee House Transportation & Regional Governance Policy 243 State Office Building Committee Saint Paul, MN 55155 253 State Office Building Saint Paul, MN 55155 RE: 2017 Guideway Status report Dear Legislators: The Minnesota Department of Transportation, in collaboration with the Metropolitan Council, is pleased to provide the 2017 Guideway Status report as required under 2016 Minnesota Statutes 174.93, subdivision 2. This report updates information for eight guideway corridors currently in operation, construction or design, and thirteen more that are in planning or analysis phase, or that were at the time of the last report in 2015. The capacity analysis looks at regional guideway funding needs and resources related to capital, operations and capital maintenance for the next ten years. If you have specific questions about this report or want additional information, please contact MnDOT’s Brian Isaacson at [email protected] or at 651 234-7783; or, you can contact Met Council’s Cole Hiniker at [email protected] or at 651 602-1748.
    [Show full text]
  • Transitway Branding Transportation Committee January 23, 2012 Northstar Line Continued
    Transitway Branding Transportation Committee January 23, 2012 Northstar Line continued 94 94 35W 35E 694 94 694 Northstar Line 694 94 35W 35E Minneapolis 694 394 Green Line St. Paul 94 494 extension Blue Line Green Line 494 494 Orange Line Orange 35W 35E 77 METRO system Red Line June 2014 Downtown Minneapolis Inset Blue Line (LRT) 94 Green Line (LRT) 35W Orange Line (BRT) 55 Red Line (BRT) Transit Stations Northstar Line (commuter rail) 94 Regional Multimodal Hub 35W Miles 0 1 2 4 6 Metropolitan Council Regional Transit Services Branding Service Type Name Logo LRT & Hwy BRT METRO Local, Limited, Express Bus Metro Transit Commuter Rail Metro Transit Northstar Regional ADA Metro Mobility Regional Dial-a-Ride Transit Link Regional Vanpool Metro Vanpool Metro Street side back Curb side front NOTE: KIOSK 1 - ALL STAINLESS STEEL SHEET IS 316L W/ #6 BRUSH FINISH. ILLUMINATED D/F CABINET W/ - ALL STAINLESS STEEL TO BE ADHERED WITH 3M4950 VHB TAPE. ILLUMINATED S/F HEADER - ALL DISSIMILAR METALS TO BE TREATED WITH ECK (ELECTROLYSIS CORROSION KONTROL) TO PROHIBIT DISSIMILAR METALS FROM ELECTROLYSIS AND GALVANIC CORROSION.A HEADER - FABRICATED ALUMINUM W/ STAINLESS STEEL EXTERIOR SHEETING 3 2 - SIDE A TO HAVE CLEAR LEXAN FACE WITH 2ND SURFACE VINYL GRAPHICS - ONLY “INFORMATION” COPY IS TO ILLUMINATE WHITE - SIDE B TO BE BLANK FACE B CABINET - FABRICATED ALUMINUM W/ STAINLESS STEEL EXTERIOR SHEETING - TWO GILL STYLE LOUVERED VENTS ON EACH END 3 - SIDE A TO HAVE DIGITAL PRINT INSERT SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY OTHERS - SIDE B TO HAVE VINYL GRAPHICS APPLIED TO DIFFUSER C CABINET DOOR - FABRICATED STAINLESS STEEL SQ.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Guide for Minneapolis Visitors
    August 2015 TRANSIT GUIDE FOR MINNEAPOLIS VISITORS 11 61 6 4 2nd St NE 1st Ave 61 4th St SE 6 Main 4 25 17 6 10 Hennepin University Ave River Place 6 6 2nd St SE 4 6 1st St Bryant 4 Main 5 Central Ave 22 5th Ave St. Anthony Main Olson Memorial Hwy 19 6th Ave 12 5th St 6 3 2nd St 14 Target Field Station N 11 1st St Washingto West River Pkwy Mississippi River Main Northstar Line Platform N e N 59 TargetT tF Fieldild 1st Ave 25 LEGEND Target Field AvAve Ramp C 17 Platform 2 Platform 1 7th St 3rd Ave n 7 10 5th Ave N 3rd St 4th St e N 14 0 2.5 5 5 3 2nd Ave 19 Walking time (minutes) 22 St. Anthony Falls 4th Ave Bryant 14 12 7 6 METRO Green Line Target Field 3 Farmers 3 2nd St approximately every 10 minutes 4 1st St throughout the day; every 10-15 Market Blue Line 11 minutes evenings; every 30-60 Ramp B/5th Street Green Line Royalston Warehouse District/ Transit Center Washingto minutes overnight. Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis 3rd St Stone Arch Bridge Central The Depot Marquette METRO Blue Line Border 14 n N Library Minneapolis Mill Ruins approximately every 10 minutes 94 Park Milwaukee during weekday rush hours; 94 1st Ave 4th St 2nd Ave S Residence every 10 minutes midday; Target Cowles Road Depot We Inn st Center Center Riv every 15 minutes evenings. Twins Way 5 5th St er 3rd Ave S 18 P 19 59 kw Loews y METRO Station Glenwood 22 Nicollet Mall 11 94 Hotel Hennepin 25 Mill City 4th Ave Gateway Mayo Clinic 6th St 3 18 7 Museum Northstar Commuter Rail Ramp A/7th Street First Transit Center 94 7 Transit Center Avenue Square 17 22 Colfax 14 Hotels
    [Show full text]
  • Northstar Commuter Rail Extension Feasibility Assessment: Summary
    Office of Freight and Commercial Vehicle Operations 395 John Ireland Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55155 7/31/2020 Northstar Commuter Rail Extension Feasibility Assessment An assessment of the feasibility to extend Northstar commuter rail service to St. Cloud was conducted by MnDOT and Metro Transit at the direction of the Minnesota State legislature during its 2019 session. This included evaluation of capital and service costs. Ridership forecasting was not included. Background Northstar Commuter Rail began operation in 2009 between downtown Minneapolis and Big Lake, serving seven stations (Target Field, Fridley, Coon Rapids, Anoka, Elk River, Big Lake) with six morning and six afternoon rush hour trains on weekdays; three trains each direction on Saturdays, Sundays and Holiday; special trains for each Minnesota Twins Game at Target Field and other special events. In October 2019, ridership averaged 2,550 on weekdays, 260 on Saturdays, and 166 on Sundays. Twins Game day ridership increased 800-1,000 over the average. Total project cost was $308.5 million. In 2010, Metro Transit and the Northstar Corridor Development Authority (NCDA) evaluated the potential for extending commuter rail to St. Cloud. At that time the findings in capital, operating cost, infrastructure constraints and limited ridership led to a recommendation of deferring further development of rail service extension. The following criteria were identified as needed to trigger re-evaluation: • Ridership: >4,500 average daily Phase I and Northstar Link boardings: As the economy recovers, if average daily Phase I ridership grows closer to initial projections and Northstar Link continues to grow, project reevaluation may be justified.
    [Show full text]
  • List of LCA Awards by City
    Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Grants by City, 1996-Present City Grant Name Fund Funding Year Awarded Amount Relinquished Amount Anoka Anoka Station Area Master Planning LCDA 2011 $22,500 $0 Anoka Greenhaven Housing LCDA 2010 $75,000 $0 Anoka IMI Cornelius (fka Eniva) TBRA 2007 $339,000 $101,162 Anoka Anoka North Central Business District LCDA 2005 $1,000,000 $0 Anoka Heart of Anoka LCDA 2001 $70,000 $0 Anoka North Central Business District TBRA 2001 $116,870 $0 Anoka Total $1,623,370 $101,162 TOD Pre-Development & Repositioning at 147th Street and Garrett Avenue and Glazier Apple Valley Avenue LCDA 2016 $35,000 $0 Apple Valley Village Pointe Plaza LCDA 2014 $1,148,639 $0 Cedar Village West (fka Commons I and Apple Valley Commons II Site Acquisition Assistance) LCDA 2011 $866,000 $866,000 Apple Valley Gathering (fka The Enclave Trails) LCDA 2011 $174,800 $174,800 Cobblestone Lakes Senior Housing & Park Apple Valley Improvement LCDA 2011 $896,000 $0 Market Analysis for the Hanson Concrete Apple Valley Site LCDA 2010 $50,000 $0 Apple Valley Master TOD Development Plan LCDA 2010 $60,000 $0 Apple Valley Cobblestone Senior Housing LCDA 2008 $556,834 $0 Apple Valley Central Village - Legacy Park North LCDA 2005 $425,000 $0 Harmony Commons (fka The Village at Apple Valley Founders Circle) LCDA 2004 $2,356,244 $2,356,244 Apple Valley Lebanon Valley Place LHIA 2003 $150,000 $0 Central Village Small Area Plan - II (fka Apple Valley Galaxie Avenue) LCDA 2002 $30,000 $0 Central Village Small Area Plan - I (fka Apple Valley Galaxie Avenue) LCDA
    [Show full text]
  • METRO GREEN LINE Light Rail Time Schedule & Line Route
    METRO GREEN LINE light rail time schedule & line map METRO GREEN LINE To Mpls-Target Field View In Website Mode The METRO GREEN LINE light rail line (To Mpls-Target Field) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) To Mpls-Target Field: 4:33 AM - 11:17 PM (2) To St. Paul-Union Depot: 5:06 AM - 11:19 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest METRO GREEN LINE light rail station near you and ƒnd out when is the next METRO GREEN LINE light rail arriving. Direction: To Mpls-Target Field METRO GREEN LINE light rail Time Schedule 24 stops To Mpls-Target Field Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 4:48 AM - 11:17 PM Monday 4:33 AM - 11:17 PM Union Depot Station 208 4th Street East, St. Paul Tuesday 4:33 AM - 11:17 PM Central Station Wednesday 4:33 AM - 11:17 PM 58 5th Street East, St. Paul Thursday 4:33 AM - 11:17 PM 10th Street Friday 4:33 AM - 11:17 PM 519 Cedar Street, St. Paul Saturday 4:48 AM - 11:17 PM Robert Street 613 Robert Street North, St. Paul Capitol/Rice St 475 Rice Street, St. Paul METRO GREEN LINE light rail Info Direction: To Mpls-Target Field Western Avenue Stops: 24 377 University Avenue West, St. Paul Trip Duration: 46 min Line Summary: Union Depot Station, Central Station, Dale Street 10th Street, Robert Street, Capitol/Rice St, Western 489 Dale Street North, St. Paul Avenue, Dale Street, N Victoria St, Lexington Parkway, Hamline Avenue, Snelling Avenue, Fairview N Victoria St Avenue, Raymond Avenue, Westgate, Prospect Park, University Avenue, St.
    [Show full text]
  • SWLRT Civil Construction Update
    2021 Construction and Going Forward As announced on Thursday, over the course of the 2020 construction season, the project staff and our contractor, Lunda-McCrossan Joint Venture encountered unforeseen obstacles in the Minneapolis portion of the alignment which will take longer to overcome. These obstacles include the construction of the corridor protection wall along the BNSF fright rail line and a secant wall to complete LRT tunnel construction in a portion of the Kenilworth corridor due to poor soil conditions. These are no small changes and require thoughtful and deliberate engineering, design plans and construction methods. While these types of setbacks are not uncommon on projects of this scale, we are also disappointed by this development. We strongly believe the long-term benefits of this project to the region and state outweigh the short-term challenges we face. While this means we most likely won’t be meeting our opening day projection of 2023, we know that 2021 will be a robust construction year. To see an overview of 2021 construction activities in Minneapolis, view the recording of the January 14 Minneapolis Town Hall. We will be sharing 2021 overviews of construction activities in the corridor cities of Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, Hopkins, and St. Louis Park in the coming weeks. Weekly Construction Photo: SouthWest Station in Eden Prairie 1 | Page Looking east towards SouthWest Station construction crews install piles that will support the bus loop/roadway. Due to poor soils conditions, project elements including track, stations, roadway and utilities are supported by piles. Eden Prairie Eden Prairie Construction: Map 1 of 2 2 | Page SouthWest Station to Eden Prairie Town Center Station Construction Overview: At the SouthWest Station we are constructing a new park-and-ride ramp adjacent to the existing ramp and a combined bus and LRT station.
    [Show full text]
  • View and Approval by Minnesota’S Tal Design (Leed) Program
    ARGET FIELD Station, located in downtown Minneapolis, is a state- deNt of-the-art, multimodal mass transit station in- iviC i ity i corporating complementary mixed-used devel- C s B opment and year-round public space. It is no ew Located in downtown Minneapolis, or disadvantage that it is also connected to Target N Target Field Station is more than simply a light-rail hub. N Field, the home of the Minnesota Twins. With A more than 500 trains passing through each day, In addition to facilitating the flow of large crowds to the home of the Target Field Station is the new “Grand Cen- tral Station” for Minneapolis, providing links Minnesota Twins, the station offers an amphitheater, public gathering spaces, to residential areas, workplaces, shopping and economic development opportunities. Designed with the environment in mind, destinations, major sporting events, and concerts while enabling travelers to visit other it also features innovative measures for collecting and reusing stormwater attractions in the Twin Cities area. runoff and snowmelt. ..... By Justin Gese, p.e., m.asce However, the facility is more than just a mass Ttransit station and mover of people. This mul- tiuse station is a community destination that provides a year-round public meeting space complete with expansive green lawns, lush veg- etation, and a 1,000-seat amphitheater. It offers new development opportunities for businesses and places for people to shop. Stormwater cap- tured on-site and water obtained through an in- novative snowmelt system are conveyed to an adjacent energy facility and reused. Moreover, the station features sustainable landscaping, and the various other context-sensitive design and construction techniques employed give it a light environmental footprint.
    [Show full text]