Rarely Exhibited Etruscan Pottery
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Umbria from the Iron Age to the Augustan Era
UMBRIA FROM THE IRON AGE TO THE AUGUSTAN ERA PhD Guy Jolyon Bradley University College London BieC ILONOIK.] ProQuest Number: 10055445 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10055445 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Abstract This thesis compares Umbria before and after the Roman conquest in order to assess the impact of the imposition of Roman control over this area of central Italy. There are four sections specifically on Umbria and two more general chapters of introduction and conclusion. The introductory chapter examines the most important issues for the history of the Italian regions in this period and the extent to which they are relevant to Umbria, given the type of evidence that survives. The chapter focuses on the concept of state formation, and the information about it provided by evidence for urbanisation, coinage, and the creation of treaties. The second chapter looks at the archaeological and other available evidence for the history of Umbria before the Roman conquest, and maps the beginnings of the formation of the state through the growth in social complexity, urbanisation and the emergence of cult places. -
Murlo 09 Biblio
BIBLIOGRAFIA Abbreviazioni SeM = “Studi e Materiali” StS = “Studi Senesi” AA = “American Accademy” WA = “World Archaeology” AARG = “Aerial Archaeology Research Group” AAS = Archivio Arcivescovile di Siena AC = “Archeologia e Calcolatori” Fonti inedite AJA = “American Journal of Archaeology” Archivio del Distretto Minerario di Grosseto, n. 367, 368, 370, pp. 1936, AJAH = “American Journal of Ancient History” 1935, 1941. AM = “Archeologia Medievale” ASA, 1961 = Archivio Soprintendenza Archeologica, pos. 9 / Siena / 21. AR = “American Academy in Rome” ARA = “Annual Review of Anthropology” Archaeol. Prospect. = “Archaeological Prospection” Manoscritti ArchCl = “Archeologia Classica” ArchLaz = “Archeologia Laziale” BICHI = BICHI G., Notizie storiche delle città, Fortezze, Castelli e Terre della ARID = “Analecta Romana Instituti Danici” Città di Siena, ASS, Ms. D.73-79. GHERARDINI = GHERARDINI B., Visita fatta nell’anno 1676 alle Città, Torre ARRETINORUM = OXÉ A., Corpus Vasorum Arretinorum, A catalogue of the signatures, shapes and cronology of italian sigillata, in “Antiquitas”, 3-4, e Castella dello Stato della Città di Siena dall’ill.mo Sig.re Bartolomeo Ghe- Bonn, 1968. rardini Auditore Generale in Siena per l’A.S. di Cosimo de Medici, Gran- ASS = Archivio di Stato di Siena duca VI di Toscana, copia del secolo XVIII, ASS, Ms. D.82-86. AttiMGrecia = “Atti e memorie della Società Magna Grecia” MACCHI = MACCHI G., Memorie, ASS, Ms. D.107-112. BA = “Beiträge zur Assijrologie” MANOSCRITTO SLOGANE = MANOSCRITTO SLOGANE, 3524 cc. 59r-67, BA = “Bollettino d'Arte” London, British Museum . BAR = “British Archaeological Reports” MERLOTTI, 1872 = MERLOTTI G., Tavole cronologiche di tutti i Rettori an- BCI = Biblioteca Comunale di Siena tichi e moderni delle parrocchie della Diocesi ed elenco dei Vescovi e Arci- BdA = “Bollettino d'Arte” vescovi di Siena, Firenze, Arezzo, Fiesole, Sovana, Pienza e Montalcino, BSSP = “Bullettino Senese di Storia Patria” Roselle e Grosseto, Massa, Volterra e Colle, AAS, Ms. -
Herakles Iconography on Tyrrhenian Amphorae
HERAKLES ICONOGRAPHY ON TYRRHENIAN AMPHORAE _____________________________________________ A Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School University of Missouri-Columbia _____________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts ______________________________________________ by MEGAN LYNNE THOMSEN Dr. Susan Langdon, Thesis Supervisor DECEMBER 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my thesis advisor, Dr. Susan Langdon, and the other members of my committee, Dr. Marcus Rautman and Dr. David Schenker, for their help during this process. Also, thanks must be given to my family and friends who were a constant support and listening ear this past year. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………………ii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS……………………………………………………………..v Chapter 1. TYRRHENIAN AMPHORAE—A BRIEF STUDY…..……………………....1 Early Studies Characteristics of Decoration on Tyrrhenian Amphorae Attribution Studies: Identifying Painters and Workshops Market Considerations Recent Scholarship The Present Study 2. HERAKLES ON TYRRHENIAN AMPHORAE………………………….…30 Herakles in Vase-Painting Herakles and the Amazons Herakles, Nessos and Deianeira Other Myths of Herakles Etruscan Imitators and Contemporary Vase-Painting 3. HERAKLES AND THE FUNERARY CONTEXT………………………..…48 Herakles in Etruria Etruscan Concepts of Death and the Underworld Etruscan Funerary Banquets and Games 4. CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………..67 iii APPENDIX: Herakles Myths on Tyrrhenian Amphorae……………………………...…72 BIBLIOGRAPHY………………………………………………………………………..77 ILLUSTRATIONS………………………………………………………………………82 iv LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. Tyrrhenian Amphora by Guglielmi Painter. Bloomington, IUAM 73.6. Herakles fights Nessos (Side A), Four youths on horseback (Side B). Photos taken by Megan Thomsen 82 2. Tyrrhenian Amphora (Beazley #310039) by Fallow Deer Painter. Munich, Antikensammlungen 1428. Photo CVA, MUNICH, MUSEUM ANTIKER KLEINKUNST 7, PL. 322.3 83 3. Tyrrhenian Amphora (Beazley #310045) by Timiades Painter (name vase). -
Crossroads 360 Virtual Tour Script Edited
Crossroads of Civilization Virtual Tour Script Note: Highlighted text signifies content that is only accessible on the 360 Tour. Welcome to Crossroads of Civilization. We divided this exhibit not by time or culture, but rather by traits that are shared by all civilizations. Watch this video to learn more about the making of Crossroads and its themes. Entrance Crossroads of Civilization: Ancient Worlds of the Near East and Mediterranean Crossroads of Civilization looks at the world's earliest major societies. Beginning more than 5,000 years ago in Egypt and the Near East, the exhibit traces their developments, offshoots, and spread over nearly four millennia. Interactive timelines and a large-scale digital map highlight the ebb and flow of ancient cultures, from Egypt and the earliest Mesopotamian kingdoms of the Akkadians, Babylonians, and Assyrians, to the vast Persian, Hellenistic, and finally Roman empires, the latter eventually encompassing the entire Mediterranean region. Against this backdrop of momentous historical change, items from the Museum's collections are showcased within broad themes. Popular elements from classic exhibits of former years, such as our Greek hoplite warrior and Egyptian temple model, stand alongside newly created life-size figures, including a recreation of King Tut in his chariot. The latest research on our two Egyptian mummies features forensic reconstructions of the individuals in life. This truly was a "crossroads" of cultural interaction, where Asian, African, and European peoples came together in a massive blending of ideas and technologies. Special thanks to the following for their expertise: ● Dr. Jonathan Elias - Historical and maps research, CT interpretation ● Dr. -
AP Art History Etruscan Study Guide
AP Art History Etruscan Study Guide "The architect should be equipped with knowledge of many branches of study and varied kinds of learning, for it is by his judgement that all work done by the other arts is put to test. This knowledge is the child of practice and theory." -Vitruvius, 1st century ce, The 10 Books on Architecture, Preface, section 3 TIMELINE Textbook Ch. 6 (pp. 156-213) Villanovan Orientalizing Archaic Classical Hellenistic 900 BCE 700- 600 BCE 600-480 BCE 480-323 BCE 323-89 BCE Founding of Rome, First Etruscan king Expulsion of Peace between Roman conquest of 753 BCE of Rome (Tarquinius Etruscan kings from Rome and Cerveteri, 273 BCE Priscus), 616-578 Rome, 509 BCE Tarquinia, 351 BCE BCE End of Social War and completion of the Romanization of Italy, 89 BCE Vocabulary Differences between Greek and Etruscan Temples 1. Necropolis Greek Etruscan 2. Stucco •stone, marble •wood, mudbrick 3. Terra-cotta •stylobate •podium with staircase leading •fluting, no base on Doric, to entrance 4. Triclinium surrounded structure •widely spread, in the front to 5. Tufa •stone-gable roof distinguish front and back and •one cella, house deity created porch 6. Tumulus •pedimental sculptures, •roof statues on raking cornice, 7. Tuscan order caryatids, metopes narrative •house statues of Gods for •3 cellas for Tunia, Uni, Menrva worship, sculptural mass – •shelters the gods, about the perfect harmony, unified structure Image Set Key Ideas *Temple of Minerva, Veii, Italy Etruscan art is characterized by a pantheon of gods celebrated in large civic 510-500 BCE and religious buildings. -
The Chronological Implications of Relief Ware Bucchero at Poggio Civitate
Etruscan Studies Journal of the Etruscan Foundation Volume 11 Article 3 2008 The hrC onological Implications of Relief Ware Bucchero at Poggio Civitate Anthony Tuck University of Massachusetts Amherst Erik O. Nielsen Franklin College Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/etruscan_studies Recommended Citation Tuck, Anthony and Nielsen, Erik O. (2008) "The hrC onological Implications of Relief Ware Bucchero at Poggio Civitate," Etruscan Studies: Vol. 11 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/etruscan_studies/vol11/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Etruscan Studies by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Chronological Implications of Relief Ware Bucchero at Poggio Civitate by Anthony Tuck and Erik Nielsen iano del Tesoro at Poggio Civitate Preserves evidence of the only 7th century BCE architectural comPlex known to date in Central Italy. 1 Thus far, three buildings of Pthis comPlex have been identified. These consist of OC1/Residence, an aPParent - ly aristocratic household, the furnishings of which attest to the wealth of its inhabitants, OC2/WorkshoP, a large and ornately decorated multifunctional workshoP, and OC3/TriPartite, a building whose triPartite interior division conforms to what we might exPect of a religious structure of the Etruscan seventh century. All stood together on the Plateau by the last quarter of the seventh century BCE. 2 StratigraPhic evidence suggests that the three buildings were destroyed in a sin - gle conflagration. 3 Although the sPecific causes of the fire can not be determined, evi - dence from OC2/WorkshoP suggests a sudden catastroPhe. -
A Near Eastern Ethnic Element Among the Etruscan Elite? Jodi Magness University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Etruscan Studies Journal of the Etruscan Foundation Volume 8 Article 4 2001 A Near Eastern Ethnic Element Among the Etruscan Elite? Jodi Magness University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/etruscan_studies Recommended Citation Magness, Jodi (2001) "A Near Eastern Ethnic Element Among the Etruscan Elite?," Etruscan Studies: Vol. 8 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/etruscan_studies/vol8/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Etruscan Studies by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Near EasTern EThnic ElemenT Among The ETruscan EliTe? by Jodi Magness INTRODUCTION:THEPROBLEMOFETRUSCANORIGINS 1 “Virtually all archaeologists now agree that the evidence is overwhelmingly in favour of the “indigenous” theory of Etruscan origins: the development of Etruscan culture has to be understood within an evolutionary sequence of social elaboration in Etruria.” 2 “The archaeological evidence now available shows no sign of any invasion, migra- Tion, or colonisaTion in The eighTh cenTury... The formaTion of ETruscan civilisaTion occurred in ITaly by a gradual process, The final sTages of which can be documenTed in The archaeo- logical record from The ninTh To The sevenTh cenTuries BC... For This reason The problem of ETruscan origins is nowadays (righTly) relegaTed To a fooTnoTe in scholarly accounTs.” 3 he origins of the Etruscans have been the subject of debate since classical antiqui- Tty. There have traditionally been three schools of thought (or “models” or “the- ories”) regarding Etruscan origins, based on a combination of textual, archaeo- logical, and linguistic evidence.4 According to the first school of thought, the Etruscans (or Tyrrhenians = Tyrsenoi, Tyrrhenoi) originated in the eastern Mediterranean. -
Per La Storia Degli Etruschi
PER LA STORIA DEGLI ETRUSCHI I. - CLUSINI VETERES e CLUSINI NOVI Plinio (N. H., Ili, 5, 52) elencando, in ordine approssimati- vamente alfabetico, le località e le repartizioni dell’Etruria dei tempi suoi, e venendo a parlare, dopo la zona marittima, di quella interna (« mtus »), ha : « Cortonenses, Capenates, Clusini novi, Clusini veteres, Fiorentini ». Questa distinzione dei Clusini in veteres e novi, può, presa a sè, rimanere di dubbio significato, per- chè l’analogia ci insegna che, teoricamente, essa potrebbe spiegarsi sia colla sovrapposizione o giustapposizione in uno stesso centro o in centri attigui di due o più elementi di popolazione (come si suole credere per gli A.rretini veteres, Fidentiores e lulienses, di cui parla Plinio stesso) ; sia con la coesistenza di due centri abitati, la popo- lazione di uno dei quali, in un qualche tempo, sia stata in parte trapiantata nel secondo, senza che il primo scomparisse (come per Aufidena, per Fabrateria, e, rimanendo in Etruria, per Faleri, Volsini e Surrina); sia infine con la coesistenza di due centri, lon- tani fra di loro, e casualmente omonimi, che con quegli epiteti si volevano differenziare, o perchè sorti realmente in età diversa, o perchè conosciuti dai Romani in età successive (cfr. Carthago e Chartago nova; Bovianum vetus e Undecumanorum etc., e Neapolis di fronte a Cuma). Che una delle sedi dei Clusini corrisponda all’attuale Chiusi di Val di Chiana non è dubbio, sia per la tradizione storica romana che, almeno dai tempi della III Sannitica in poi, vi allude con precisi riferimenti topografici, sia per le epigrafi latine in essa rin- venute, che parlano di ordo Clusinorum, populus Clusìnus, respu- blica. -
Etruscan Winged “Demons”
First in Flight: Etruscan Winged “Demons” Marvin Morris University of California, Berkeley Classical Civilizations Class of 2016 Abstract: Etruscan winged Underworld figures (commonly referred to as winged “demons”) represent one of the most fascinating and least understood aspects of funerary iconography in ancient Etruria. Their function, along with their origin, has long been the subject of scholarly debates. However, over the last two decades, scholars have begun to take a closer look at these chthonic figures. Recent scholarship has begun to provide answers to many of the most fundamental questions concerning their role, even if disagreements remain over their murky origins. Expanding on interpretations that have cast new light on how these winged (and non winged) Underworld figures functioned, questions concerning Etruscan religious beliefs and funerary ideology can now be reconsidered. Introduction: Iconography and Ideology Etruscan winged Underworld figures (commonly referred to as winged “demons”) represent one of the most fascinating and least understood aspects of funerary iconography in ancient Etruria. Their function, along with their origin, has long been the subject of scholarly debates. However, over the last two decades, scholars1 have begun to take a closer look at these chthonic figures. Recent scholarship has begun to provide answers to many of the most fundamental questions concerning their role, even if disagreements remain over their murky origins2. Expanding on interpretations that have cast new light on how these winged (and non winged) Underworld figures functioned, questions concerning Etruscan religious beliefs and funerary ideology can now be reconsidered. One such question concerns the sudden increase in the appearance of winged “demons” that begins to occur around the end of the fifth century BCE. -
A Bucchero Pesante Column Krater in Iowa
A BUCCHERO PESANTE COLUMN KRATER IN IOWA (Con le tavv. II-VII f. t.) In 1970 the University of Iowa Museum of Art acquired a large column krater said to have come from Vulci (1). It was presented as part of an exhi- bition of ancient Italian pottery from Midwestern collections in 1971 (2). This article describes the krater and then relates it to other vases of similar type attempting to establish a secure date and provenance. The investigation of parallel examples enables us to determine more specifically the nature of « bucchero pesante » production in the Vulci area and its relationship to Etru- scan pottery manufacture at other sites. Plate II illustrates the vase in its present state (3). Minor breaks along (1) I wish to thank Mr. Ulfert Wilke, Director of the Museum of Art, for per- mission to publish the vase. Special thanks are due Prof. Kyle Μ. Phillips, Jr. of Bryn Mawr College, for reading the manuscript and offering helpful suggestions. Photographs of the Iowa krater are by B. Yarborough; drawings in the text are by the author. Sections of this article appeared in a paper entitled, A Sixth Century Bucchero Pesante Column Krater in Iowa presented by the author at the 73rd Conference of the Archaeolo- gical Institute of America at Cincinnati, 1971. An abstract appears in AJA LXXVI, 1972, p. 208. The manuscript was completed in November, 1972. Funds for photographs were supplied by a stipend from the Graduate College of the University of Iowa. In addition to the St. Etr. standard abbreviations, the following appear in the footnotes: Bartoloni - G. -
Cultural Transmission and Semantic Change of Ceramic Forms in Grave Goods of Hellenistic Etruria
Cultural Transmission and Semantic Change of Ceramic Forms in Grave Goods of Hellenistic Etruria Raffaella Da Vela Abstract: This contribution addresses semantic change in ceramics as connected to identity con- struction. With three case studies from Hellenistic Etruria, beaked situlae, lagynoi and amphorae, I aim to answer the following research question: How can a change of vessel functions in funerary contexts express the changing cultural identities of the deceased and their family? The choice of fu- nerary contexts allows an approximation of the change of meaning through the analysis of the dis- tance between daily life and ritual function of the objects. Each case study presents a different rela- tionship between changing meaning and identity construction: the beaked situlae, related to the so- cial identity of new social layers; the amphorae, related to local cultural identities during the process of Romanisation; and the lagynoi, related to the construction of multicultural identities in new- founded agricultural settlements. The distinct patterns of the three forms suggest the possibility of analysing stratified and complex societies by the study of changing meaning. This article approaches the semantic change terranean represent a breaking point in the of some grave goods in funerary contexts of social structure of many Etruscan communi- Hellenistic Etruria as a consequence of a ties. This break effected a change which global process of cultural transmission involved many aspects of the material cul- which affected Etruscan and Italic cultures1 ture. Three case studies are selected and during the Hellenistic period. The process of isolated to analyse specific research ques- adopting the Latin language and roman insti- tions which are stated at the beginning of tutions in Etruria, especially in the inland each paragraph and relate to the construction and northern part of the region, engaged a of local identities and their transformation complexity of layers. -
Catalogue 8 Autumn 2020
catalogue 8 14-16 Davies Street london W1K 3DR telephone +44 (0)20 7493 0806 e-mail [email protected] WWW.KalloSgalleRy.com 1 | A EUROPEAN BRONZE DIRK BLADE miDDle BRonze age, ciRca 1500–1100 Bc length: 13.9 cm e short sword is thought to be of english origin. e still sharp blade is ogival in form and of rib and groove section. in its complete state the blade would have been completed by a grip, and secured to it by bronze rivets. is example still preserves one of the original rivets at the butt. is is a rare form, with wide channels and the midrib extending virtually to the tip. PRoVenance Reputedly english With H.a. cahn (1915–2002) Basel, 1970s–90s With gallery cahn, prior to 2010 Private collection, Switzerland liteRatuRe Dirks are short swords, designed to be wielded easily with one hand as a stabbing weapon. For a related but slightly earlier in date dagger or dirk with the hilt still preserved, see British museum: acc. no. 1882,0518.6, which was found in the River ames. For further discussion of the type, cf. J. evans, e Ancient Bronze Implements, Weapons and Ornaments of Great Britain and Ireland, london, 1881; S. gerloff and c.B. Burgess, e Dirks and Rapiers of Great Britain and Ireland, abteilung iV: Band 7, munich, Beck, 1981. 4 5 2 | TWO GREEK BRONZE PENDANT BIRD)HEAD PYXIDES PRoVenance christie’s, london, 14 may 2002, lot 153 american private collection geometRic PeRioD, ciRca 10tH–8tH centuRy Bc Heights: 9.5 cm; 8 cm liteRatuRe From northern greece, these geometric lidded pendant pyxides are called a ‘sickle’ type, one with a broad tapering globular body set on a narrow foot that flares at the base; the other and were most likely used to hold perfumed oils or precious objects.